Connect with us

Entertainment

Cannes: 'Fury Road' prequel ‘Furiosa’ forgets what makes the 'Mad Max' movies great

Published

on

Cannes: 'Fury Road' prequel ‘Furiosa’ forgets what makes the 'Mad Max' movies great

When Australia’s George Miller came here in 2016 to serve as jury president, just months after his “Mad Max: Fury Road” won six Oscars, he swept in like a conquering hero. His movie was undeniable: a reinvigoration of both his career and the action genre. Often, the relationship between Cannes and the blockbuster directors it invites comes off as strained — see French artist Zaho de Sagazan serenading “Barbie” filmmaker and this year’s jury president Greta Gerwig at Tuesday’s opening ceremony — but with Miller, the moment felt right.

Things change. His “Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga” (in theaters May 24), a somewhat dutiful new prequel to “Fury Road,” had its world premiere out of competition Wednesday, unspooling at the capacious Grand Lumière Theatre to a rapt audience that, it must be said, didn’t laugh once. “Who laughs at the end of the world?” you may ask. But that would be to deny Miller the richness of his grungy post-apocalyptic series, one that pairs brutal action sequences with emotional resonance, dark mythmaking, sociopolitical alarm and, yes, the odd Ozploitative chuckle at some catastrophic personal misfortune.

Some of that is in evidence in “Furiosa,” but nowhere near enough. For the first time in Miller’s now-five-film franchise, he seems to be falling shy of the immediacy he’s sustained, often deliriously, for an entire feature. Any prequel would necessitate a certain distance: This is what happened before the story you already know. And if you ever confused Charlize Theron’s hollowed-out stare in “Fury Road” for a lack of backstory (that’s actually the performance you’re noticing), “Furiosa” is here to supply that material for you, not unentertainingly. But with every supersaturated blue sky, russet-colored desert shot and faux-literary chapter heading (“2. Lessons from the Wasteland”), the movie gets further away from feeling like a tale that’s happening, to one that’s already been told, cleaned up and prettified.

Miller still mounts a story more confidently than just about anyone on the planet, and his kickoff, a 10-minute, near-wordless chase, is the definition of getting off on the good foot. A ferociously protective mom (the wonderful Charlee Fraser) trails, on horseback and motorcycle, a gang of kidnappers who have fled with her preteen daughter Furiosa (Alyla Browne, expressive during the film’s first hour). The latter, while unfortunate to be caught, is resourceful in her own way, chewing through fuel lines and blessed with the benefit of an especially prescient name. Flung over the back of a bike, her long hair flowing in the wind, the shot brings to mind to another defiant woman in Miller’s 1982 “The Road Warrior.”

Advertisement

A scene from the movie “Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga.”

(Jasin Boland / Warner Bros. Pictures)

A word about that stone-cold classic: By dint of the technology that was then on hand (i.e., no digital effects and a nutso stunt crew), “The Road Warrior” throws you into bodily panic with every kinetic setup. “Furiosa” rarely feels dangerous. Too much of its blood and fire is the work of computers, and for the first time, that work is obvious. There’s something very un-“Mad Max” about this; the tactility of the earlier films fed into the realness of potentially surviving the fall of civilization, even if that meant coming face to face with a tyrannical Tina Turner.

But the punkish spirit of the young Furiosa — forced to sit in a cage like a sad pet — goes a long way to setting up our connection with the story. Less so her captor, Dementus, played by Chris Hemsworth, who, though he tries hard to build an arm-swinging, cape-wearing, motormouthed swagger, doesn’t have the lines to give his gang leader the kind of vanity we could relish in a villain. Eventually we get those bleach-pale War Boys from “Fury Road” again, along with the monstrously masked Immortan Joe (Lachy Hulme), his thuggish mutant son Rictus (Nathan Jones) and a geographical trade war that’s a bit more complex than it needs to be.

Advertisement

Miller, who with co-screenwriter Nick Lauthoris worked out these script details before they approached “Fury Road,” mainly have their sights set on a centerpiece that comes close to redeeming the entire film: a lavishly armed War Rig truck barreling down an endless highway, hounded by attackers with propellers strapped to their backs. Finally, the grandeur of the older movies is here, as is Anya Taylor-Joy, whose Furiosa has now gone through her Yentl-passing-for-a-boy phase and now seems meant to wear a glamorous black smudge on her forehead and learn everything she needs to know about “road war” from Praetorian Jack (Tom Burke of “The Souvenir,” channeling the Leone-esque minimalism that marked Mel Gibson’s original antihero).

Two people drive a truck in a post-apocalyptic wasteland.

Tom Burke and Anya Taylor-Joy in the movie “Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga.”

(Jasin Boland / Warner Bros. Pictures)

We have a lot to learn about road war as well. What’s a bommy-knocker? (I won’t spoil it, but generally, you pay extra for that option.) There’s a finding-your-calling film built into “Furiosa” — maybe it took the apocalypse for this former fruit-picker to discover what she does well — plus a hint of a front-seat romance that’s never made explicit. But just as the movie is hitting its stride and Simon Duggan’s cinematography settles down, Miller strays back to a less-exciting vengeance narrative.

Much has already been made of Taylor-Joy’s lack of dialogue — hardly a drawback when you take in her burning stares and see how potently she’s making something out of nothing. If the movie has a deficiency (and it does), it’s not one of exposition but euphoria. The “Mad Max” universe was never that cautionary, not if you yourself ever wondered how you’d make it through societal meltdown and what kind of mohawk you’d get. The exhilaration of the polecats sequence in “Fury Road” — that fact that there’s such a thing as polecats — made the series a constant source of glee.

Advertisement

“Furiosa,” to its distinction and detriment, ends up being too self-regarding, too downbeat. It takes the fun out of survival. Miller’s imagination has fed into “The Last of Us,” “Fallout” and a host of other grayscale nightmares for movies and TV. He knows better than anyone that forward momentum is key to a “Mad Max” movie. Leave the prequels to those who don’t have any gas left in the tank.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Ponman Movie Telugu Review And Rating, OTT Movie Review

Published

on

Ponman Movie Telugu Review And Rating, OTT Movie Review
Movie Name : Ponman

Release Date : 14 March, 2025
123telugu.com Rating : 3/5
Starring : Basil Joseph, Sajin Gopu, Lijomol Jose ,Deepak Parambol, Anand Manmadhan, Sandhya Rajendran, Rajesh Sharma, Kiran Peethambaran, Reju Sivadas, Jaya Kurupp, Midhun Venugopal, Thankam Mohan, Shylaja P Ambu
Director : Jothish Shankar
Producer : Vinayaka Ajith
Music Director : Justin Varghese
Cinematographer : Sanu John Varghese
Editor : Nidhin Raj Arol
Related Links : Trailer

Ponman, the latest Malayalam film starring Basil Joseph, has made its way to OTT and is now available in Telugu as well. Here’s our take on this dark comedy-drama.

Story:

PP Ajesh (Basil Joseph) has an unusual profession – he lends gold to families in need during weddings, helping them meet societal expectations. When he lends 25 sovereigns of gold to Steffi (Lijomol Jose), he expects an equivalent amount of money to be paid the day after the wedding. However, she refuses and moves to Kollam, her ruthless husband Mariyano’s (Sajin Gopu) hometown. Determined to reclaim what is rightfully his, Ajesh embarks on a risky journey. What challenges does he face? Why did he choose such a precarious profession? Was Mariyano aware of the deal? How does Steffi respond? The film unravels these answers intriguingly.

Advertisement

Plus Points:

Basil Joseph once again proves his knack for picking unique roles. Venturing into dark comedy with a socially relevant backdrop adds an interesting dimension to the film. His performance is compelling, effortlessly balancing humour and emotion.

Sajin Gopu delivers a powerful act as Mariyano, embodying an unpredictable and ruthless character. After making an impression in Aavesham, he surprises with a completely different persona, keeping the audience engaged.

Lijomol Jose makes a mark despite her limited screen presence, portraying Steffi with conviction. The supporting cast, including Anand Manmadhan and Sandhya Rajendran, adds depth to the narrative. The comedy woven into serious moments is a strong highlight of the film.

Minus Points:

Advertisement

While the first half lays a strong foundation, the second half falters in pacing, making the film feel sluggish. The writing loses its grip, leading to sequences that lack the intended impact.

Basil Joseph delivers a solid act, but given his track record in comedic roles, audiences might find it difficult to accept him in a serious setting. The character could have been better suited to an actor with a more intense screen presence.

Certain characters, especially Anand Manmadhan’s, start off well but eventually fade into the background. A more defined character arc would have enhanced their impact on the story.

The climax, which should have been a high point, instead feels abrupt and underwhelming. The final confrontation lacks intensity, and the resolution could have been more gripping.

Technical Aspects:

Advertisement

Director Jothish Shankar presents a decent effort, but a more refined screenplay and stronger character development could have elevated the film. Justin Varghese’s music is functional but doesn’t leave a lasting impression. Sanu John Varghese’s cinematography effectively captures the film’s setting, while Nidhin Raj Arol’s editing could have been sharper to maintain a tighter narrative. The production values are decent.

Verdict:

On the whole, Ponman presents a decent premise with a mix of dark comedy and social commentary. While Basil Joseph delivers a commendable performance, the film is weighed down by a slow second half, underdeveloped characters, and an abrupt climax. Despite its flaws, it offers a few engaging moments, making it a passable one-time watch for those who enjoy offbeat dramas.

123telugu.com Rating: 3/5

Reviewed by 123telugu Team 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Now streaming, Irish Rep's 'Beckett Briefs,' headlined by F. Murray Abraham, asks the essential questions

Published

on

Now streaming, Irish Rep's 'Beckett Briefs,' headlined by F. Murray Abraham, asks the essential questions

In the program for “Beckett Briefs,” a bill of three short plays by Samuel Beckett at the Irish Repertory Theatre in New York City, three questions are posed: “Why these plays?” “Why now?” And “Why Beckett?”

The concise answers put forth by the production’s director, Ciarán O’Reilly, and Irish Rep Artistic Director Charlotte Moore are not my own, but I agree with them when they write that “there has never been a more consequential time to delve deeper and ask the fundamental questions: The Whys.”

On a recent short trip, while deciding what to see, I felt compelled to make room for Beckett in what was an impossible schedule. Yes, I was curious to see Oscar winner F. Murray Abraham in the play I consider Beckett’s masterpiece, “Krapp’s Last Tape.” And yes, I find I’m unable to pass up an opportunity of seeing “Play,” in which three characters — a man, his wife and his mistress — are potted in funeral urns in the hereafter, each retelling their side of a romantic triangle that hardly seems worth the everlasting discord.

F. Murray Abraham in “Krapp’s Last Tape,” part of Irish Rep’s “Beckett Briefs.”

(Carol Rosegg)

Advertisement

As for “Not I,” the briefest of the three pieces, I have been waiting for another chance to experience the spotlighted mouth of a woman talking a mile a minute in fragments that I have yet to be able to piece together. Sarah Street, who heroically performed the work at a hurtling pace, confirmed for me that coherent narrative sense wasn’t what Beckett was aiming for.

After I arranged tickets, it was announced that the League of Live Stream Theater will be streaming “Beckett Briefs” from March 16 through March 30. I had thought this bill would be an ideal streaming offering and wished I had known in advance, but I’m glad I got to experience the production in person for reasons that have to do with the “Why Beckett?” question.

Beckett is perennially timely because his works concern themselves with those eternal questions that the political emergencies of the day cannot override. Even as we confront impossible times, we remain planted in that greater impossibility — human existence.

Kate Forbes in "Play," part of Irish Rep's "Beckett Briefs."

Kate Forbes in “Play,” part of Irish Rep’s “Beckett Briefs.”

(Carol Rosegg)

Advertisement

But I was craving “Beckett Briefs” for other reasons. I want to be more mindful of where I place my attention. Our minds are being hijacked by Big Tech, and one of the ironies of our age is that, even as our access to information, entertainment and consumer goods has grown exponentially, our capacity to focus and extend ourselves cognitively has become severely impaired.

As an act of personal resistance, I’m tackling James Joyce’s “Ulysses” again. I’ll admit it’s a struggle. I read a chapter, browse through supporting materials online, and then listen to the chapter in an audio recording on YouTube. Tech isn’t all bad. The resources on the internet were not available to me when I read “Ulysses” for the first time as a student. But back then, I didn’t feel the need to read Joyce as a sociological corrective. And I was somewhat more comfortable with the idea of difficulty in art. I wasn’t conditioned to expect everything worthwhile to be predigested and readily exploitable.

Joyce was, of course, Beckett’s mentor, and though he went in the opposite direction of Joyce’s maximalism, he shares the same determination to start from scratch with artistic form. In whatever discipline Beckett happened to be working in, he reinvestigated not just the vocabulary but the grammar of that medium.

His plays demonstrate a fierce effort to get down to brass tacks. What is the least that is required to reveal the most? Audiences have no choice but to exist in the theatrical moment, without recourse to linear logic, sententious language or psychological epiphanies.

Advertisement

“Krapp’s Last Tape” creates a dialogue between an old man and his younger self, through audio diary tapes that reveal what the character was like 30 years earlier — to his everlasting disgust. Krapp eavesdrops, in effect, on his younger literary aspirations and his decision to end the relationship that turned out to be his last chance of love.

The play may be Beckett’s most personal, the one that brings you closest to the man. In less than an hour, it achieves what took Marcel Proust, another key literary influence, thousands of pages in “In Search of Lost Time” to convey — that we die not once but myriad times, being a succession of selves, recognizable yet discrete.

Abraham, adopting a dignified clown demeanor, has an embodied theatricality that is well suited to Beckett’s style. His exuberant acting benefits from the severity of Beckett’s concision. I recently showed my students the film of John Hurt’s performance in “Krapp’s Last Tape,” which I was lucky enough to see in person at the Kirk Douglas Theatre. It remains for me the high-water mark of Beckett acting. But I was grateful to experience the text through a different voice and countenance.

Sarah Street, left, Roger Dominic Casey and Kate Forbes in "Play," part of Irish Rep's "Beckett Briefs."

Sarah Street, left, Roger Dominic Casey and Kate Forbes in “Play,” part of Irish Rep’s “Beckett Briefs.”

(Carol Rosegg)

Advertisement

It tells you something about Beckett that an actor of Abraham’s stature wants to do this play off-Broadway at this time of his career. The cast of “Play” — Kate Forbes, Street (doing double duty after “Not I”) and Roger Dominic Casey — lends the astringent playfulness a fresh tone in a lucid, deliberate, perhaps a tad overcareful production. The audience at Irish Rep on the Sunday matinee I attended may have been Beckett veterans, but it’s vital that a new generation of artists stays in contact with the vision of this pathbreaking playwright.

Which brings me to the other reason I had for seeing “Beckett Briefs” — my complete fatigue with realism. Or should I say my exhaustion with a kind of TV realism that seems to believe the purpose of art is to offer a slice not so much of life but of idiosyncratic behavior. It’s not simply that the canvas has shrunk. Beckett worked on a rigorously compact scale. It’s that realism has been confused with reality, and I worry that actors and writers are losing sight of the experience of living by zooming in on psychological minutiae.

Beckett reminds us of the metaphysical vastness that the stage can contain. Luckily, his style, always so ahead of us, is amenable to the close scrutiny of streaming. Were he alive he would have designed a digital performance that would have made us rethink the possibilities of the form. But it’s heartening that more people will be able to experience through “Beckett Briefs” the aesthetic renewal of his example.

For streaming tickets to “Beckett Briefs,” click here.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Be Happy movie review: Abhishek is ‘extraordinary’, says Amitabh Bachchan; check what others are saying | Mint

Published

on

Be Happy movie review: Abhishek is ‘extraordinary’, says Amitabh Bachchan; check what others are saying | Mint

Amitabh Bachchan calls Be Happy, Abhishek Bachchan’s latest movie, “extraordinary”. The dance-drama, directed by Remo D’Souza, premiered on Amazon Prime Video on March 14.

“…what an honour for you Abhishek .. proud of you .. and today saw BE HAPPY .. such an extraordinary performance .. love you,” Big B wrote on Twitter (now X).

As a father, Amitabh Bachchan loved his son’s performance in the movie. But, what about others? Let’s find out.

“BE HAPPY is truly an amazing film! I watched it today with my Maa, and it was such a heart-touching experience. Incredible performances—more power to Jr. Bachchan!” wrote one social media user.

“it’s a gripping movie, Brilliant performance by Abhishek,” wrote another user.

Advertisement

“Just watched ‘Be Happy’ and I’m still reeling from Abhishek Sir’s incredible performance.. Abhishek Sir! You’re one of the most talented actors of our time. Your acting is always top-notch, but this performance was something special. Keep shining, AB!” came from another user.

“A tender, heartwarming portrayal of a father-daughter bond. His quiet, nuanced, and emotionally guarded role as a single parent really suited him,” reacted one user.

Be Happy movie reviews

“The script gets something right in the father-daughter bond but doesn’t excavate the depth and complexities of single parenting, grief and trauma. In focusing on the drama, D’Souza takes his eye off his core competence—dance,” Udita Jhunjhunwala wrote on Livemint.

“A direct-to-OTT release is a smart choice, freeing it from box office pressures and allowing viewers to discover it on their own time. Despite its flaws, Be Happy leaves you with a smile,” Rishabh Suri wrote on Hindustan Times.

“Abhishek Bachchan literally shines as the struggling single father…But even his honest and sincere effort cannot save this ship that starts sinking in the second half!” wrote Trisha Gaur on Koimoi while calling actress Inayat Verma a “show-stealer”.

Advertisement

“Verma is a sparkler, lighting up the screen. And Bachchan, who did such a solid job being a dad-to-a-daughter in ‘I Want To Talk’, comes off more stolid here,” commented Shubhra Gupta on Indian Express.

Continue Reading

Trending