Connect with us

Education

Texas School District Removes Bible and Anne Frank Adaptation in Back-to-School Sweep

Published

on

Texas School District Removes Bible and Anne Frank Adaptation in Back-to-School Sweep

Sooner or later earlier than college students returned to school rooms in North Texas, a college district ordered principals and librarians to take away books together with the Bible and a graphic novel adaptation of Anne Frank’s “The Diary of a Younger Lady” from libraries and school rooms.

The Keller Impartial Faculty District reviewed the 41 challenged books in the course of the earlier faculty yr, however a coverage permitted by the college district’s board of trustees final week requires workers to drag the books from cabinets in order that they are often reviewed once more.

The last-minute e-book sweep is one in every of a number of adjustments in faculties throughout the nation that can prohibit college students’ entry to books within the new faculty yr. Dad and mom, faculty board officers and lawmakers have lately challenged books at a tempo not seen in years, with among the most scrutinized books coping with sexual and racial identification.

The Keller faculty district serves greater than 35,000 college students in a portion of Fort Price and in different North Texas cities. The district’s first day of faculty was on Wednesday. On Tuesday, a college administrator despatched an electronic mail, which was shared with The New York Occasions, to principals and librarians to inform them to take away sure books that had been challenged by the tip of the day. The listing included Toni Morrison’s “The Bluest Eye.”

A number of the books, together with “The Bluest Eye” and the Anne Frank diary adaptation, had been permitted by a committee and permitted to stay in libraries after they have been challenged over the past faculty yr, in response to an internet file on the district’s web site. Different books, together with Maia Kobabe’s “Gender Queer,” have been faraway from the district’s assortment or have been allowed solely in highschool libraries or in particular elements of campus after the preliminary assessment.

Advertisement

These books will probably be reviewed once more. The district’s seven-member board of trustees adopted a brand new coverage on Aug. 8 that requires the district to rethink each e-book that was challenged within the earlier yr. The district mentioned in a press release that the rules — which will probably be used to find out whether or not books are allowed on the cabinets — could be thought of by the board at its subsequent assembly, scheduled for Aug. 22. For college kids, these books are in limbo for now.

“As soon as in place, our librarians will be capable of use these pointers to assessment the books that had been challenged,” the assertion mentioned. “As quickly as a e-book is permitted by the brand new pointers, it will likely be returned to the shelf.”

The district mentioned that the trustees weren’t accessible for interviews on Wednesday morning.

Charles Randklev, the president of the board of trustees, mentioned in a Fb put up that the assessment was wanted “to guard children from sexually express content material.” He wrote that the earlier assessment course of “uncovered kids to pornographic materials.”

“The problem course of for these supplies will undergo a committee composed of group and workers members, which will probably be open to the general public and video and audio recorded,” Dr. Randklev wrote.

Advertisement

Laney Hawes, a guardian of 4 kids within the district, mentioned she was one in every of about seven or eight folks on the assessment committee for the Anne Frank graphic novel. The committee members learn the e-book, met to speak about its worth for about 40 minutes and unanimously determined it ought to stay on faculty cabinets, she mentioned.

“We left that room pondering we saved it, we saved this e-book,” Ms. Hawes mentioned. “Just for this many months later to return again and be informed, ‘No, we don’t like your final result, so we at the moment are going to re-review each e-book in response to our strict listing of necessities.’”

Efforts to take away books from libraries, bookstores and faculties have all the time been current, however educators, librarians, dad and mom and politicians have mentioned that e-book bans have gotten extra frequent. The techniques have additionally modified, with conservative teams particularly backing these efforts in political races.

In North Texas, Patriot Cell Motion, a brand new Christian political motion committee, endorsed 11 faculty board candidates who all gained their elections. Three of these candidates started serving on the Keller faculty district board in Might 2022.

Jonathan Friedman, director of free expression and education schemes at PEN America, the free-speech group, mentioned in a press release that the Keller faculty board’s resolution was an “appalling affront to college students’ First Modification rights.”

Advertisement

“It’s just about unimaginable to run a college or a library that purges books in response to any grievance from any nook,” Mr. Friedman mentioned.

Within the coming weeks, college students throughout the nation will return to highschool and face educators grappling with new restrictions born out of the renewed push to ban books.

In Florida, some faculties are debating how sure books adjust to a brand new regulation, referred to as “Don’t Say Homosexual” by opponents, which constrains classroom instruction and dialogue about sexual orientation and gender identification.

In a college district in Virginia, dad and mom will obtain a notification when their kids test a e-book out from the college library and will probably be requested to signal a consent type after receiving a syllabus that lists the assigned studying.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Education

Video: Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

Published

on

Video: Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

new video loaded: Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

transcript

transcript

Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators tried to block access to Pomona College’s graduation ceremony on Sunday.

[chanting in call and response] Not another nickel, not another dime. No more money for Israel’s crime. Resistance is justified when people are occupied.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in U.S.

Continue Reading

Education

Video: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

Published

on

Video: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

new video loaded: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

transcript

transcript

Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

Police officers arrested 33 pro-Palestinian protesters and cleared a tent encampment on the campus of George Washingon University.

“The Metropolitan Police Department. If you are currently on George Washington University property, you are in violation of D.C. Code 22-3302, unlawful entry on property.” “Back up, dude, back up. You’re going to get locked up tonight — back up.” “Free, free Palestine.” “What the [expletive] are you doing?” [expletives] “I can’t stop — [expletives].”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Israel-Hamas War

Continue Reading

Education

How Counterprotesters at U.C.L.A. Provoked Violence, Unchecked for Hours

Published

on

How Counterprotesters at U.C.L.A. Provoked Violence, Unchecked for Hours

A satellite image of the UCLA campus.

On Tuesday night, violence erupted at an encampment that pro-Palestinian protesters had set up on April 25.

The image is annotated to show the extent of the pro-Palestinian encampment, which takes up the width of the plaza between Powell Library and Royce Hall.

Advertisement

The clashes began after counterprotesters tried to dismantle the encampment’s barricade. Pro-Palestinian protesters rushed to rebuild it, and violence ensued.

Arrows denote pro-Israeli counterprotesters moving towards the barricade at the edge of the encampment. Arrows show pro-Palestinian counterprotesters moving up against the same barricade.

Police arrived hours later, but they did not intervene immediately.

Advertisement

An arrow denotes police arriving from the same direction as the counterprotesters and moving towards the barricade.

A New York Times examination of more than 100 videos from clashes at the University of California, Los Angeles, found that violence ebbed and flowed for nearly five hours, mostly with little or no police intervention. The violence had been instigated by dozens of people who are seen in videos counterprotesting the encampment.

Advertisement

The videos showed counterprotesters attacking students in the pro-Palestinian encampment for several hours, including beating them with sticks, using chemical sprays and launching fireworks as weapons. As of Friday, no arrests had been made in connection with the attack.

To build a timeline of the events that night, The Times analyzed two livestreams, along with social media videos captured by journalists and witnesses.

The melee began when a group of counterprotesters started tearing away metal barriers that had been in place to cordon off pro-Palestinian protesters. Hours earlier, U.C.L.A. officials had declared the encampment illegal.

Security personnel hired by the university are seen in yellow vests standing to the side throughout the incident. A university spokesperson declined to comment on the security staff’s response.

Mel Buer/The Real News Network

Advertisement

It is not clear how the counterprotest was organized or what allegiances people committing the violence had. The videos show many of the counterprotesters were wearing pro-Israel slogans on their clothing. Some counterprotesters blared music, including Israel’s national anthem, a Hebrew children’s song and “Harbu Darbu,” an Israeli song about the Israel Defense Forces’ campaign in Gaza.

As counterprotesters tossed away metal barricades, one of them was seen trying to strike a person near the encampment, and another threw a piece of wood into it — some of the first signs of violence.

Attacks on the encampment continued for nearly three hours before police arrived.

Counterprotesters shot fireworks toward the encampment at least six times, according to videos analyzed by The Times. One of them went off inside, causing protesters to scream. Another exploded at the edge of the encampment. One was thrown in the direction of a group of protesters who were carrying an injured person out of the encampment.

Advertisement

Mel Buer/The Real News Network

Some counterprotesters sprayed chemicals both into the encampment and directly at people’s faces.

Sean Beckner-Carmitchel via Reuters

Advertisement

At times, counterprotesters swarmed individuals — sometimes a group descended on a single person. They could be seen punching, kicking and attacking people with makeshift weapons, including sticks, traffic cones and wooden boards.

StringersHub via Associated Press, Sergio Olmos/Calmatters

In one video, protesters sheltering inside the encampment can be heard yelling, “Do not engage! Hold the line!”

In some instances, protesters in the encampment are seen fighting back, using chemical spray on counterprotesters trying to tear down barricades or swiping at them with sticks.

Advertisement

Except for a brief attempt to capture a loudspeaker used by counterprotesters, and water bottles being tossed out of the encampment, none of the videos analyzed by The Times show any clear instance of encampment protesters initiating confrontations with counterprotesters beyond defending the barricades.

Shortly before 1 a.m. — more than two hours after the violence erupted — a spokesperson with the mayor’s office posted a statement that said U.C.L.A officials had called the Los Angeles Police Department for help and they were responding “immediately.”

Officers from a separate law enforcement agency — the California Highway Patrol — began assembling nearby, at about 1:45 a.m. Riot police with the L.A.P.D. joined them a few minutes later. Counterprotesters applauded their arrival, chanting “U.S.A., U.S.A., U.S.A.!”

Just four minutes after the officers arrived, counterprotesters attacked a man standing dozens of feet from the officers.

Twenty minutes after police arrive, a video shows a counterprotester spraying a chemical toward the encampment during a scuffle over a metal barricade. Another counterprotester can be seen punching someone in the head near the encampment after swinging a plank at barricades.

Advertisement

Fifteen minutes later, while those in the encampment chanted “Free, free Palestine,” counterprotesters organized a rush toward the barricades. During the rush, a counterprotester pulls away a metal barricade from a woman, yelling “You stand no chance, old lady.”

Throughout the intermittent violence, officers were captured on video standing about 300 feet away from the area for roughly an hour, without stepping in.

It was not until 2:42 a.m. that officers began to move toward the encampment, after which counterprotesters dispersed and the night’s violence between the two camps mostly subsided.

The L.A.P.D. and the California Highway Patrol did not answer questions from The Times about their responses on Tuesday night, deferring to U.C.L.A.

While declining to answer specific questions, a university spokesperson provided a statement to The Times from Mary Osako, U.C.L.A.’s vice chancellor of strategic communications: “We are carefully examining our security processes from that night and are grateful to U.C. President Michael Drake for also calling for an investigation. We are grateful that the fire department and medical personnel were on the scene that night.”

Advertisement

L.A.P.D. officers were seen putting on protective gear and walking toward the barricade around 2:50 a.m. They stood in between the encampment and the counterprotest group, and the counterprotesters began dispersing.

While police continued to stand outside the encampment, a video filmed at 3:32 a.m. shows a man who was walking away from the scene being attacked by a counterprotester, then dragged and pummeled by others. An editor at the U.C.L.A. student newspaper, the Daily Bruin, told The Times the man was a journalist at the paper, and that they were walking with other student journalists who had been covering the violence. The editor said she had also been punched and sprayed in the eyes with a chemical.

On Wednesday, U.C.L.A.’s chancellor, Gene Block, issued a statement calling the actions by “instigators” who attacked the encampment unacceptable. A spokesperson for California Gov. Gavin Newsom criticized campus law enforcement’s delayed response and said it demands answers.

Los Angeles Jewish and Muslim organizations also condemned the attacks. Hussam Ayloush, the director of the Greater Los Angeles Area office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, called on the California attorney general to investigate the lack of police response. The Jewish Federation Los Angeles blamed U.C.L.A. officials for creating an unsafe environment over months and said the officials had “been systemically slow to respond when law enforcement is desperately needed.”

Fifteen people were reportedly injured in the attack, according to a letter sent by the president of the University of California system to the board of regents.

Advertisement

The night after the attack began, law enforcement warned pro-Palestinian demonstrators to leave the encampment or be arrested. By early Thursday morning, police had dismantled the encampment and arrested more than 200 people from the encampment.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending