Connect with us

Culture

Trotter: Everyone loses if PGA Tour fails to make changes at WM Phoenix Open

Published

on

Trotter: Everyone loses if PGA Tour fails to make changes at WM Phoenix Open

The 2024 WM Phoenix Open should be remembered for Nick Taylor’s magnificent performance, which began with a course record-tying 60 in the first round and ended with three consecutive birdies on Sunday, the last of which gave him a two-hole, sudden-death playoff victory over Charley Hoffman at TPC Scottsdale.

But years from now, when reflecting on what took place, we are more likely to remember the drunkenness, boorishness and unruliness of fans than we are the brilliance of Taylor and the other golfers — and that’s an issue local tournament organizers and the PGA Tour need to wrap its arms around before things get completely out of control.

I get it; the WM Phoenix Open has always been known for its excessiveness, particularly on No. 16 where fans — some in costumes, many drinking — seemingly take more pleasure in booing tee shots that miss the par-3 green than they do in cheering the ones that stick. But this year went beyond that in a significant way.

There was the idiot who jumped shirtless into a bunker, the man who sat on a chair in a drunken stupor and urinated on himself while others walked by as if it were normal behavior, the woman who fell over the railing on No. 16, the blacked-out patrons who were carried out on people’s shoulders, and the fans who fought along the gallery ropes.

On Saturday, tournament officials closed the entrance gates and halted beer sales presumably because the crowds were growing too large and the situation too unruly. While a cause for concern, what should have the attention of PGA Tour officials is the reaction of players who were so put off by the incivility that they confronted spectators in the middle of their round.

Zach Johnson, one of the Tour’s more mild-mannered participants and someone who is known for being unfailingly polite, lost patience and confronted a fan who was heckling him about the Ryder Cup loss and his decisions as team captain.

“Don’t sir me. Somebody said it,” Johnson said, clearly frustrated and angry. “I’m just sick of it. Just shut up.”

Billy Horschel admonished someone in the gallery for talking loudly while his playing partner, Nicolo Galletti, was in his backswing. “Buddy,” Horschel said for everyone to hear, “when he’s over a shot, shut the hell up.”

South Korean-born golfer Byeong Hun An said the following Saturday on X, formerly known as Twitter: “S—show. Totally out of control on every hole. … Yes, I know what I signed up for. Played here multiple times over the years and it was fun until today.”

Advertisement

If the Tour (and/or the Thunderbirds, the local organization that runs the event) fails to take note, how long before the players begin to feel the hassle isn’t worth it and skip out on the event? And if that happens, everyone loses — the Tour, which is in a battle with LIV Golf for audience retention; the players, who will miss out on one of the higher-paying non-signature events; and the well-behaved fans who want to see some of the world’s best golfers and not some local Johnny throwing back pints like he’s Homer Simpson.

For years, the atmosphere was considered good fun. It was different from any other Tour event as fans were able to raise the energy by raising the roof. Players also had fun with it, like two years ago when Harry Higgs pulled up his shirt after parring No. 16 and group mate Joel Dahmen removed his shirt and twirled it above his head, all while fans tossed beers onto the green. The tour may not liked it, but Netflix sure did when it made it a major part of Dahmen’s episode of “Full Swing.”

Everyone seemed to enjoy the uniqueness of the tournament in general and the hole in particular. It allowed a break from the stuffiness normally associated with what’s known as the gentleman’s game. The Tour even leaned into the frat-party atmosphere, accepting it as a one-off on the schedule and not pushing back on the unofficial moniker of the People’s Open.

But the Waste Management now resembles the Wasted Management. Organizers have failed to recognize that people generally are predisposed to push the boundaries of behavior. And each time some boorishness is tolerated or accepted, it becomes the floor for the next act of debauchery until we finally get what we got last weekend.

Advertisement

Some will attribute the excessiveness to weather delays that allowed for more drinking. Although possible, could it also be simpler than that? Could it be that people viewed it as an opportunity to act like fools because there was no fear of major consequence?

Before this year, I was interested in attending the Phoenix Open and taking in the controlled rowdiness of No. 16, though never understanding why anyone would spend more than $13 (2020 price) on a beer only to throw it on the green. But maybe that’s better than people consuming them, because too many people like to use alcohol as an excuse for inappropriate behavior, which can result in worst-case scenarios.

I’ve had a chance to attend two games as a fan in the last couple of years, one at Lambeau Field, and the other in Golden 1 Center in Sacramento. Neither was enjoyable because of inebriated fans who act as if they are free to say and do whatever they want.

The Phoenix Open may be known as the People’s Open, but the people should never be the story. The golf should. That was not the case this year, sadly.

“I think the Thunderbirds probably need to do something about it,” Johnson told reporters afterward. “I’m assuming they’re ashamed because, at some point, somebody’s either gonna really, really get hurt or worse.”

Advertisement

(Photo: Ben Jared / PGA Tour via Getty)

Culture

Try This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies

Published

on

Try This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies

Welcome to Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about printed works that have gone on to find new life as movies, television shows, theatrical productions and more. This week’s challenge highlights thrillers first published as novels (or graphic novels) that were adapted into popular films. Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. And scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the books and their screen versions.

Continue Reading

Culture

Test Your Knowledge of the Authors and Events That Helped Shape the United States

Published

on

Test Your Knowledge of the Authors and Events That Helped Shape the United States

Welcome to Lit Trivia, the Book Review’s regular quiz about books, authors and literary culture. In honor of Gen. George Washington’s birthday on Feb. 22, this week’s super-size challenge is focused on the literature and history related to the American Revolution. In the 10 multiple-choice questions below, tap or click on the answer you think is correct. After the last question, you’ll find links to exhibits, books and other materials related to this intense chapter in the country’s story, including an award-winning biography of the general and first U.S. president.

Continue Reading

Culture

Video: How Much Do You Know About Romance Books?

Published

on

Video: How Much Do You Know About Romance Books?

Let’s play romance roulette. No genre has dominated the books world in the last few years. Like romance, it accounts for the biggest percentage of book sales, their avid fan bases. Everyone has been talking about romance as a Book Review editor and as a fan of the genre myself, I put together a to z glossary of 101 terms that you should know if you want to understand the world of romance are cinnamon roll. You may think a cinnamon roll is a delicious breakfast treat, but in a romance novel, this refers to a typically male character who is so sweet and tender and precious that you just want to protect him and his beautiful heart from the world. Ooh, a rake. This is basically the Playboy of historical romance. He defies societal rules. He drinks, he gambles. He’s out on the town all night and is a very prolific lover with a bit of a reputation as a ladies’ man. FEI these are super strong, super sexy, super powerful, immortal, fairy like creatures. One of my favorite discoveries in terms that I learned was stern brunch daddy. A lot of daddy’s usually a male love interest who seems very intimidating and alpha, but then turns out to be a total softie who just wants to make his love interest brunch. I think there’s a misconception that because these books can follow these typical patterns, that they can be predictable and boring. But I think what makes a really great romance novel is the way that these writers use the tropes in interesting ways, or subvert them. If you can think of it, there’s probably a romance novel about it. Oops, there’s only one bed. This is one of my personal favorite tropes is a twist on forced proximity. Characters find themselves in very close quarters, where inevitably sparks start to fly. Why choose is the porkulus dose of the romance world. Sometimes the best way to resolve a love triangle is by turning it into a circle, where everyone is invited to play. Oops, we lost one spice level. There’s a really wide spectrum. You can range from really low heat or no spice, what might also be called kisses. Only then you start to get into what we call closed door or fade to Black. These books go right up to the moment of intimacy, and then you get into what we call open door, which is more explicit. And sometimes these can get very high heat or spicy and even start verging into kink. There’s one thing that almost every romance novel has in common. It’s that no matter what the characters get up to in the end, it ends with a happily ever after. I say almost every romance novel. Sometimes you’re just happy for now.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending