Connect with us

Culture

Trotter: Everyone loses if PGA Tour fails to make changes at WM Phoenix Open

Published

on

Trotter: Everyone loses if PGA Tour fails to make changes at WM Phoenix Open

The 2024 WM Phoenix Open should be remembered for Nick Taylor’s magnificent performance, which began with a course record-tying 60 in the first round and ended with three consecutive birdies on Sunday, the last of which gave him a two-hole, sudden-death playoff victory over Charley Hoffman at TPC Scottsdale.

But years from now, when reflecting on what took place, we are more likely to remember the drunkenness, boorishness and unruliness of fans than we are the brilliance of Taylor and the other golfers — and that’s an issue local tournament organizers and the PGA Tour need to wrap its arms around before things get completely out of control.

I get it; the WM Phoenix Open has always been known for its excessiveness, particularly on No. 16 where fans — some in costumes, many drinking — seemingly take more pleasure in booing tee shots that miss the par-3 green than they do in cheering the ones that stick. But this year went beyond that in a significant way.

There was the idiot who jumped shirtless into a bunker, the man who sat on a chair in a drunken stupor and urinated on himself while others walked by as if it were normal behavior, the woman who fell over the railing on No. 16, the blacked-out patrons who were carried out on people’s shoulders, and the fans who fought along the gallery ropes.

On Saturday, tournament officials closed the entrance gates and halted beer sales presumably because the crowds were growing too large and the situation too unruly. While a cause for concern, what should have the attention of PGA Tour officials is the reaction of players who were so put off by the incivility that they confronted spectators in the middle of their round.

Zach Johnson, one of the Tour’s more mild-mannered participants and someone who is known for being unfailingly polite, lost patience and confronted a fan who was heckling him about the Ryder Cup loss and his decisions as team captain.

“Don’t sir me. Somebody said it,” Johnson said, clearly frustrated and angry. “I’m just sick of it. Just shut up.”

Billy Horschel admonished someone in the gallery for talking loudly while his playing partner, Nicolo Galletti, was in his backswing. “Buddy,” Horschel said for everyone to hear, “when he’s over a shot, shut the hell up.”

South Korean-born golfer Byeong Hun An said the following Saturday on X, formerly known as Twitter: “S—show. Totally out of control on every hole. … Yes, I know what I signed up for. Played here multiple times over the years and it was fun until today.”

Advertisement

If the Tour (and/or the Thunderbirds, the local organization that runs the event) fails to take note, how long before the players begin to feel the hassle isn’t worth it and skip out on the event? And if that happens, everyone loses — the Tour, which is in a battle with LIV Golf for audience retention; the players, who will miss out on one of the higher-paying non-signature events; and the well-behaved fans who want to see some of the world’s best golfers and not some local Johnny throwing back pints like he’s Homer Simpson.

For years, the atmosphere was considered good fun. It was different from any other Tour event as fans were able to raise the energy by raising the roof. Players also had fun with it, like two years ago when Harry Higgs pulled up his shirt after parring No. 16 and group mate Joel Dahmen removed his shirt and twirled it above his head, all while fans tossed beers onto the green. The tour may not liked it, but Netflix sure did when it made it a major part of Dahmen’s episode of “Full Swing.”

Everyone seemed to enjoy the uniqueness of the tournament in general and the hole in particular. It allowed a break from the stuffiness normally associated with what’s known as the gentleman’s game. The Tour even leaned into the frat-party atmosphere, accepting it as a one-off on the schedule and not pushing back on the unofficial moniker of the People’s Open.

But the Waste Management now resembles the Wasted Management. Organizers have failed to recognize that people generally are predisposed to push the boundaries of behavior. And each time some boorishness is tolerated or accepted, it becomes the floor for the next act of debauchery until we finally get what we got last weekend.

Advertisement

Some will attribute the excessiveness to weather delays that allowed for more drinking. Although possible, could it also be simpler than that? Could it be that people viewed it as an opportunity to act like fools because there was no fear of major consequence?

Before this year, I was interested in attending the Phoenix Open and taking in the controlled rowdiness of No. 16, though never understanding why anyone would spend more than $13 (2020 price) on a beer only to throw it on the green. But maybe that’s better than people consuming them, because too many people like to use alcohol as an excuse for inappropriate behavior, which can result in worst-case scenarios.

I’ve had a chance to attend two games as a fan in the last couple of years, one at Lambeau Field, and the other in Golden 1 Center in Sacramento. Neither was enjoyable because of inebriated fans who act as if they are free to say and do whatever they want.

The Phoenix Open may be known as the People’s Open, but the people should never be the story. The golf should. That was not the case this year, sadly.

“I think the Thunderbirds probably need to do something about it,” Johnson told reporters afterward. “I’m assuming they’re ashamed because, at some point, somebody’s either gonna really, really get hurt or worse.”

Advertisement

(Photo: Ben Jared / PGA Tour via Getty)

Culture

Can You Match the Places These Authors Lived With Settings in Their Books?

Published

on

Can You Match the Places These Authors Lived With Settings in Their Books?

A strong sense of place can deeply influence a story, and in some cases, the setting can even feel like a character itself. This week’s literary geography quiz highlights places where authors were born (or lived) that later became locations in their books. To play, just make your selection in the multiple-choice list and the correct answer will be revealed. At the end of the quiz, you’ll find links to the works if you’d like to do further reading.

Continue Reading

Culture

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

Published

on

Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.

AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries, by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.


For those of us in the national memory-keeping business, anniversaries hold near-totemic power. Satisfyingly round units of time, ideally bearing fancy, Latin-derived names, serve as the overburdened pegs on which to hang think pieces and museum exhibits, revisionist documentaries and maudlin public ceremonies. The arbitrary nature of such occasions is precisely what gives them their charge, inviting us to set aside complacency and submit to a comprehensive check-in.

In his new book, “America, U.S.A.,” Eddie S. Glaude Jr. presents an intriguing variation on the genre, seeing the country’s 250th birthday as an anniversary of anniversaries: 50 years since the malaise-ridden, schlock-heavy Bicentennial. A century since the subdued Prohibition-era Sesquicentennial. A century and a half since telegraphed reports of George Armstrong Custer’s defeat by the Lakota and Cheyenne at Little Bighorn rudely interrupted the Gilded Age Republic’s 100th birthday party.

If an anniversary offers a snapshot of a moment, the core of Glaude’s book is an old-timey photo album, a collection of notable episodes from earlier national reckonings, long-ago glances in the mirror. An estimable scholar of Black history, politics and religion at Princeton — best known for “Begin Again,” his 2020 meditation on James Baldwin’s relevance for our times — Glaude focuses, as his subtitle puts it, on “how race shadows the nation’s anniversaries.”

Such celebrations, he contends, have never really been the moments for honest self-reflection they are often advertised to be. Instead, the nation usually shatters the mirror, refusing to accept what it prefers not to see. “American anniversaries are often moments to turn a blind eye to the evils of the past and the present,” Glaude writes, “to suppress the fact of America’s divided soul.”

Advertisement

It’s a clever concept, and, needless to say, perfectly timed. Last year, Glaude notes, the Trump administration executed a hostile takeover of the government’s studiously bipartisan 250th anniversary planning. It is now preparing a program that is certain to conceal more than it reveals about the country ostensibly being celebrated.

Glaude, in no mood for celebration, argues that such omissions and evasions also defined commemorations in the past. In 1875, Frederick Douglass predicted “one grand Centennial hosannah of peace and good will to all the white race of this country.” He was right: The nation reached 100 years old at a crucial moment in the post-Civil War fight over racial equality, with white Northerners ready to give up on Southern Reconstruction. The occasion would help the once-warring sections to reunite around a shared commitment to white supremacy. On May 10, 1876, at the opening of the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, the police tried to bar Douglass from the grandstand, until a white politician vouched for him.

The 150th anniversary came soon after a resurgent Ku Klux Klan successfully pushed for a restrictive immigration law aimed at keeping America a “Nordic” nation. At the lavishly funded, lightly attended celebrations in Philadelphia, Black veterans of World War I were excluded from marching in the opening parade. A writer with The Associated Negro Press wondered “what was in the breast of those black men who fought to make America safe for Democracy and on Monday stood on the sidelines, forgotten, as the Nordic strode by in all his vain pride.”

By 1976, when the nation marked its Bicentennial, the violence of the ’60s had destroyed any semblance of consensus. Vietnam and Watergate had eroded trust in the government. The commission initially tasked with organizing the anniversary was disbanded amid reports of corruption. Corporations filled the vacuum, Glaude explains, with “star-spangled whoopee cushions; patriotic toilet seats; Liberty hamburgers; red, white and blue beer cans.” The author, around 8 years old at the time, dimly remembers donning a pair of tricolor trousers.

A half-century later, Glaude is refreshingly honest about the depths of his despair. “I do not love America, and never have, especially now,” he writes in one of the more startling opening sentences I’ve read in some time. He dismisses this year’s Semiquincentennial as reaching back “to a storybook America that requires either the banishment of Black people from view or the reduction of our role in the country’s history, so as to affirm America’s ongoing quest to be a more perfect union.”

Advertisement

Undoubtedly true. But Trump doesn’t own the country, at least not yet, nor the 250th anniversary of one of the most radically liberatory and confusingly contradictory events in world history — an inspiration, as Glaude shows, even to critical observers of the American experiment, like Douglass. Far from the revanchist MAGA-palooza in Washington, I suspect this summer’s unasked-for invitation to national soul-searching may surprise us yet.

Despite his despair, Glaude concludes that “the past still offers resources for us to freedom-dream.” So, too, does this book.


AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries | By Eddie S. Glaude Jr. | Crown | 270 pp. | $31

Continue Reading

Culture

Summer’s Best Beach Reads

Published

on

Summer’s Best Beach Reads

Moore is a dependable ingredient in any summer reading soufflé. Her airy novels accomplish what they came to do: entertain and transport, without the pyrotechnics of, say, books that eschew quotation marks. In “Down With the Shipmans,” three sisters, laden with baggage, converge on their late mother’s beach cottage, only to learn that their father and his much younger wife are planning to sell the place.

The stakes are high, the drama is juicy and the views are sublime. Moore even provides two beach dogs — Leo (an unruly pit bull mix) and Cinnamon (“golden retriever, red bandanna, long pink tongue”) — to keep things lively. (Comes out June 2)

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending