Connect with us

Culture

Sha'Carri Richardson, chasing an Olympic legacy, has already made one back home

Published

on

Sha'Carri Richardson, chasing an Olympic legacy, has already made one back home

DALLAS — It’s the middle of June and just shy of 11 a.m. on a Wednesday. The track and infield at David W. Carter High School is bustling. The sky is mostly clear and bluer than a teenager’s tongue after a Jolly Rancher. The Texas heat is already sweltering, as if the sun rose from the East and loitered just south of I-20. It was hot enough to laminate skin with sweat. To dehydrate the dandelions on the barren grassy field across the street. To wonder if Willis Carrier deserved a Nobel Prize for his 1902 invention of the modern air conditioner.

But it’s not even remotely too hot for Kennedy Jackson-Miles, a 14-year-old whose fingers are spread on the rubbery surface of the track, her feet pressed against metal blocks. She’s a sprinter heading to high school and a prodigy for the Cedar Hill Blaze summer track club. It’s apparent as she explodes out of the blocks, throttles down after about 10 meters, then returns to do it again. Her T-shirt is soaked. Her forehead glistens. Her braces sparkle, because she’s smiling.

“I’m going to be in the Olympics in 2028,” she said during a break after her umpteenth rep from the blocks. “Because I have the mindset for it and I see it in my future.”

Sounds fantastical, predicting an Olympic debut at 18 years old. And then you see the look in coach Marcus Stokes’ eyes when he says she’ll be in Los Angeles in 2028. And then she spouts her birthday as if she’s bragging about its recency — “March Fourth, two-thousand ten” — and reminding you 14-year-olds aren’t choosing hours of work in this Texas oven, during their summer break, unless they’re built differently. And then you remember who preceded her on this journey.

On this same track, at this same school, in this same heat, Sha’Carri Richardson put in the same work. She is about to make her Olympic debut, qualified for the 100-meter in Paris, with a chance to secure her spot as a national legend and one of the marquee faces of American track and field.

Advertisement

“There’s no doubt about who’s the greatest to ever come out of Dallas,” said Robert DeHorney, a long-time coach in the area who is taking over as head coach of cross country and track at Hillcrest High School in North Dallas.

“And it’s Sha’Carri Richardson. … She was lights-out from the beginning. This baby was fast when she came out the damn womb.”

But Richardson was first, and still is, the face of a region and culture. The pride of Dallas. The might of North Texas. The ambassador for a local community teeming with talent.

For the longest time, it was undercover, hidden behind the monstrosity of Texas football. But Michael Johnson, Oak Cliff’s own, shined a spotlight on the track culture with his heroics in 1996. He had people all over North Texas claiming to be his cousin.

“Still,” Johnson said during an interview at Hayward Field in Eugene, Ore. “I got cousins I don’t even know.”

Advertisement

Sha’Carri Richardson runs at the U.S. Olympic trials in June. She’ll compete in her first Olympics later this week in the women’s 100-meter. (Patrick Smith / Getty Images)

Johnson became a legend with his all-time performance in the 1996 Olympics, winning gold in the 200- and 400-meter races. But according to locals, he wasn’t a prodigy during his Skyline High School days. He was a late bloomer who blossomed at Baylor, where he won five NCAA championships and helped establish the Bears’ reputation as “Quarter Mile U.”

Johnson’s heroics, though, shined a light on a gem of a culture. Nothing tops the Friday Night Lights, but the Dallas sprint scene is one of fervor, immense talent and strong community — especially following Johnson, the first from the area to make it big in the sport.

“Great athletes are made across the country,” Johnson said. “There are special places everywhere. But Dallas is special to me. It’s home.”

Now, 28 years after Johnson put North Texas track and field on the international map, Richardson, also from the Oak Cliff area of Dallas, carries with her the spirit of her region. She’s taken it to new heights, especially for women sprinters.

Having already secured an epic world championship, she embarks on her debut Olympics in Paris with her home, her culture, on her back.

Advertisement

In Richardson is the sheer talent reminiscent of Roy Martin. They called him “Robot” because of his mechanical running style, but he’s one of the greatest high school sprinters ever. Straight out of Roosevelt High. His 200-meter dash of 20.13 seconds in 1985 is still the national high school record.

In Richardson is the competitive spirit of Marlon Cannon and Derrick Cunningham. Famous rivals in the 400 meters whose battles against one another lit up the city. Both local superstars, Cannon from South Oak Cliff and Cunningham from Carter High, would have Sprague Stadium teeming with excitement.

In Richardson is the strength of Henry Neal, the 5-foot-7, 177-pound sprinter from Greenville High, who, as a senior in 1990, ran the 100 meters in 10.15 at the state championships, a national high school record that lasted until 2019.

In Richardson is the showmanship of Michael Johnson. The ability to not only meet moments, but look good while doing so. He went into the Atlanta Games as the prohibitive favorite and illustrated his expectations with a gold earring, a gold Cuban link chain and his now-iconic gold Nike spikes.

In Richardson is the inspiration of the Texas Relays, the seminal event in the state. Held at the University of Texas, the high school portion is where kids put their big dreams on the line. Before packed stadiums, with their neighborhoods behind them, they test themselves against the best in the state. And Dallas always shows up.

Advertisement

“That’s how you make your mark,” said Vance Johnson, host of the Texas Track Dads podcast, and, most importantly, father of Indiana University-bound sprinter Aliyah Johnson.

“I tell everybody the same thing when their kids go down to Texas Relays their freshman year — they will never be the same. You have to qualify for the Texas relays. UT will post the names of who made it. And once they go, they’re gonna see the best in the state. And when they come back, they’re really gonna want to go hard. Because they’ve got to get back to Texas Relays.”

Richardson made her name living up to those occasions. Before she shocked the world with the race of her life in the 2023 world championships, before she became a national star at LSU by winning the national championship in the 100 meters and the coveted Bowerman Award, she was a must-watch in North Texas. Where summer meets are packed and high school meets carry the intensity of decades-long rivalries.

John E. Kincaide Stadium

Students practice at Carter High’s John E. Kincaide Stadium in Dallas, Texas, where Sha’Carri Richardson once plied her trade. (Aric Becker / AFP via Getty Images)

In middle school, she won the 200-meter at the Dallas Independent Schools Invitational by three seconds. She was a freshman at the Leon Hayes Relay when she clocked 12.00 seconds in the 100 meters at John Kincaide Stadium in Dallas in 2015. Second place was 12.80 seconds.

As a sophomore, she won the 4A state title in the 100 for Carter and was runner-up in the 200. She defended her 100 title as a junior and won the state championship in the 200.

Advertisement

Richardson finished her high school career with another state championship in both. Her time of 11.12 seconds in the 100 bested the national record (11.14) set by Marion Jones 26 years earlier, though Richardson’s time was wind-aided. Her 200-meter time in 2018 was second-best in the nation and set a Texas state meet record. Richardson had fans, classmates and meet officials asking for photos and autographs.

Richardson has long been a show to behold.

“One time,” said DeHorney, who coached against Richardson all four years, “I can’t remember if it was a state meet or Texas relays, but she pulled up at least 10 meters from the line. And still ran 11.4. Blew my mind. She was on her heels for the last seven to 10 meters. Still 11.4. Never seen anything like that.”

Her swag didn’t come from nowhere. She absorbed it. From her people. From her neighborhood. From the track soil from which she sprouted.

Her particular section, Oak Cliff, has endured some of the same issues prevalent in the inner city around the nation. Raised by her grandmother, Betty Harp, Richardson’s life has been touched by many of the issues common in poverty.

Advertisement

“It’s a pretty tough area. You’ve got to come correct,” Michael Johnson said. “When I was growing up, it was a pretty good neighborhood. It became a lot more difficult after I left. By the time Sha’Carri came along, it was a rougher area. But it was always tough as far as competition. You had to have personality. You had to have confidence. Otherwise, you’d get eaten alive.”


Character is the fruit of struggle’s labor. The ones who survive, who thrive, do so because they’ve managed to harvest intangibles from the adversity.

And in North Texas track, when the work ethic merges with talent to produce greatness, it gets your name in the mouth of the neighborhood.

“Have you ever heard of Indya Mayberry?” DeHorney said. “She’s going to TCU. You ever heard of Nasya Williams? She’s going to LSU. Royaltee Brown is going to Baylor. Christine Mallard is at USC now. I’m trying to tell you it’s ridiculous down here, the amount of talent.”

That includes DeHorney’s daughter, Kennedy, a sprinter headed to Memphis on a full-ride scholarship.

Advertisement

They all know the name Sha’Carri Richardson. The next generation has developed an affinity for the superstar. Not only is she from their soil and has reached the pinnacle. But they’ve watched her fall from grace in the public eye and bounce back.

That matters in a community of overcomers.

Sha'Carri Richardson

“There’s no doubt about who’s the greatest to ever come out of Dallas,” says Robert DeHorney, a long-time coach in the area. “It’s Sha’Carri Richardson.” (Christian Petersen / Getty Images)

“They really look up to her,” said Vance Johnson, the host of Texas Track Dads, who interviews area runners on his show. “She made an adjustment but she never changed who the person is. She’s a professional, but she’s still Sha’Carri. And out here we like the spice. But she knows how to be professional, too. I think that’s important. It goes a long way. These young athletes, they see her.”

Krystan Bright, 18, is one of those youngsters who sees Richardson. That’s why, though she’s graduated from Cedar Hill High and no longer runs with the Blaze, she’s still on this Carter High track on this hot summer day. Right next to Kennedy Jackson-Miles, Bright working on hurdles in the thick warmth of June.

Bright’s AAU Junior Olympic T-shirt is soaked and tucked beneath her sports bra. Her face glistens with sweat. She pants as she talks after a rep on the first two hurdles. She is preparing to run track in college this fall. In her first-ever meet as a freshman, she ran the 300-meter hurdles in a minute. She was so slow, the team cut her. The magnitude of track in Dallas was instilled. She couldn’t go out like that. So she joined the Cedar Hill Blaze and committed to hurdles.

Advertisement

She just finished her senior season. She made state in the 300, finishing sixth in Texas at 42.67 seconds. She also holds her school records in the 100 and 300 hurdles.

In her is the resilience of Richardson.

“She’s such an inspiration,” Bright said. “To see her story and everything she’s been through, it gives a lot of motivation. She’s always been a superstar. It was a little different for me. I was an underdog. But once you get on that track, it’s the same for everybody. You gotta produce. And it’s all fun. It’s all good. It’s all love. It’s community.”

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Sha’Carri Richardson, with emphatic win at trials, closing in on Olympic glory

(Top illustration: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic; photo: Hannah Peters / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Culture

The Books We’re Excited About in Early 2025

Published

on

The Books We’re Excited About in Early 2025

A new year means new books to look forward to, and 2025 already promises a bounty — from the first volume of Bill Gates’s memoirs to a new novel by the reigning Nobel laureate, Han Kang, to a biography of Rosemary Woodruff Leary, the wife and psychedelic collaborator of the counterculture pioneer Timothy Leary.

On this week’s episode, Gilbert Cruz and Joumana Khatib talk about some of the upcoming books they’re most anticipating over the next several months.

Books discussed:

“Stone Yard Devotional,” by Charlotte Wood

“Silence,” by Pico Iyer

Advertisement

“Onyx Storm,” by Rebecca Yarros

“Gliff,” by Ali Smith

“The Dream Hotel,” by Laila Lalami

“The Colony,” by Annika Norlin

“We Do Not Part,” by Han Kang

Advertisement

“Playworld,” by Adam Ross

“Death of the Author,” by Nnedi Okorafor

“The Acid Queen: The Psychedelic Life and Counterculture Rebellion of Rosemary Woodruff Leary,” by Susannah Cahalan

“Tilt,” by Emma Pattee

“Dream Count,” by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

Advertisement

“Hope: The Autobiography,” by Pope Francis

“Jesus Wept: Seven Popes and the Battle for the Soul of the Catholic Church,” by Philip Shenon

“The Antidote,” by Karen Russell

“Source Code,” by Bill Gates

“Great Big Beautiful Life,” by Emily Henry

Advertisement

“Sunrise on the Reaping,” by Suzanne Collins

We would love to hear your thoughts about this episode, and about the Book Review’s podcast in general. You can send them to books@nytimes.com.

Continue Reading

Culture

Grand Slam prize money is enormous. The economics of tennis tournaments is complicated

Published

on

Grand Slam prize money is enormous. The economics of tennis tournaments is complicated

Four times a year, one of the biggest and most important tennis tournaments in the world sends out an announcement full of dollar signs and zeroes with the words “record prize money” scattered liberally.

The four Grand Slams, the first of which begins Sunday in Melbourne, are the high points of the tennis calendar. Players at the 2025 Australian Open will compete for $59million (£47m) this year — over $6.2m more than last year. In 2024, the four tournaments paid out over $250m between them, while their leaders spent the year aligning themselves with the players who make their events unmissable, whose gravity pulls in the broadcast deals and sponsorships, with their own dollar signs and zeroes.

Led by Australian Open chief Craig Tiley, the Grand Slams led the movement for a so-called premium tour which would pare down the overloaded tennis calendar and guarantee top players always being in the same events, let alone time zones. It would also lock swaths of the globe out of the worldwide spectacle that tennis represents.

The great irony is that despite the largesse and the cozy relationship, the players get a smaller cut of the money at the Grand Slams than they do in most of the rest of the rest of that hectic, endless season — and a fraction of what the best athletes in other sports collect from their events. The Australian Open’s prize pool amounts to about a 15-20 percent cut of the overall revenues of Tennis Australia, the organization that owns and stages the tournament, which accounts for nearly all of its annual revenue. The exact numbers at the French Open, Wimbledon and U.S. Open vary, but that essential split is roughly a constant. The 2023 U.S. Open had a prize pool of $65m against earned revenue from the tournament that came out at just over $514m, putting the cut at about 12 percent. The U.S. Open accounted for just under 90 percent of USTA revenues that year.

The explanations from the Grand Slams, which collectively generate over $1.5bn (£1.2bn) a year, run the gamut. They need to dedicate hundreds of millions of dollars each year to fund junior tennis development and other, less profitable tournaments in their respective nations — an obligation pro sports leagues don’t have. There is a constant need to upgrade their facilities, in the silent race for prestige and primacy of which the constant prize money one-upmanship is just one element.

Advertisement

Aryna Sabalenka with her winner’s check at the 2024 U.S. Open. (Emaz / Corbis via Getty Images)

That dynamic is not lost on players — least of all Novak Djokovic, the top men’s player of the modern era and a co-founder of the five-year-old Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA).

“I’m just going to state a fact,” Djokovic said during a post-match news conference in Brisbane last week.  “The pie split between the governing bodies in major sports, all major American sports, like NFL, NBA, baseball, NHL, is 50 percent. Maybe more, maybe less, but around 50 percent.

“Ours is way lower than that.”


Since 1968, the first year in which the four majors offered prize money as part of the Open Era’s embrace of professional tennis players, the purses have only grown. The 1968 French Open was the first to offer prize money, with Ken Rosewall earning just over $3,000 for beating Rod Laver in the final. The women’s singles champion, Nancy Richey, was still an amateur player, so could not claim her $1,000 prize. By 1973, lobbying from Billie Jean King helped convince the U.S. Open to make prize money equal for men and women through the draws; it took another 28 years for the Australian Open to do so year in, year out. Venus Williams’ intervention helped force the French Open and Wimbledon to follow suit in 2007.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

‘I think we deserve better’: How and why tennis lets women down

Advertisement

Fifty years after Rosewall’s triumph in Paris, the 2018 men’s champion Rafael Nadal took home $2.35million, an increase of over 73,000 percent. The year-on-year increases at each major are more modest, usually between 10 and 12 percent, but that percentage of tournament revenue remains steadfast, if not entirely immovable.

The Grand Slams argue that there are plenty of hungry mouths at their table, many more than just the 128 players that enter each singles draw each year.

Tennis Australia is a not-for-profit and a business model built on significant investment into delivering the event and promoting the sport to drive momentum on revenue and deliver consistently increasing prize money,” Darren Pearce, the organization’s chief spokesperson, said in a statement this week.

Money from the Australian Open also helps fund tournaments in Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart, as well as the United Cup, the combined men’s and women’s event in Perth and Sydney. Pearce said the prize money increases outpace the revenue growth.

The Grand Slams also point to the millions of dollars they spend on player travel, housing, transportation and meals during tournaments, though team sport athletes receive those as well. Eloise Tyson, a spokesperson for the All England Lawn Tennis Club, which stages Wimbledon, noted that overall Grand Slam prize money had risen from $209million in 2022 to $254m last year, a 22 percent increase.

Advertisement

“Alongside increasing our player compensation year-on-year, we continue to make significant investment into the facilities and services available for players and their teams at The Championships,” Tyson wrote in an email.

Officials with France’s tennis federation, the FFT, which owns the French Open, did not respond to a request for comment.

Brendan McIntyre, a spokesman for the United States Tennis Association, which owns the U.S. Open, released a statement this week touting the USTA’s pride in its leadership on player compensation, including offering equal prize money and the largest combined purse in tennis history at the 2024 US Open. A first-round exit earned $100,000, up 72 percent from 2019. Just making the qualifying draw was good for $25,000.

“As the national governing body for tennis in the U.S, we have a broader financial obligation to the sport as a whole,” the organization said.

“The USTA’s mission is to grow tennis at all levels, both in the U.S. and globally, and to make the sport accessible to all individuals in order to inspire healthier people and communities.”

Advertisement

The infrastructure required to stage a Grand Slam tournament is vast — on and off the court. (Glen Davis / Getty Images)

None of the organizations outlined a specific formula for determining the amount of prize money they offered each year, which is roughly the same as a percentage of their parent organizations overall revenues. That may be a coincidence, though the Grand Slams also have the benefit of not facing any threat to their primacy.

The USTA’s statement gestures at how the structure of tennis contributes to this financial irony. In soccer, countries and cities bid to host the Champions League and World Cup finals; the Olympics changes every four years and even the Super Bowl in the NFL moves around the United States, with cities and franchises trying to one-up one another.

The four Grand Slams, though, are the four Grand Slams. There are good reasons for this beyond prestige: the infrastructure, both physical and learned, required to host a two- or three-week event at the scale of a major year in, year out is available to a vanishingly small number of tennis facilities around the world. There is no opportunity for another organization or event to bid to replace one of the Grand Slams by offering a richer purse or other amenities.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

A year ago, tennis was broken. It’s more broken now


This dynamic has been in place for years and has become more important in recent months. The PTPA has hired a group of antitrust lawyers to evaluate the structure of tennis. The lawyers are compiling a report on whether the the sport includes elements that are anti-competitive, preparing for a possible litigation with the potential to remake the sport.

Advertisement

The ATP and WTA Tours, which sanction 250-, 500- and 1000-level events as well as the end-of-season Tour Finals, give players a larger share of revenue. There is some disagreement between players and officials over how much it is and the methods of accounting; some player estimates hover around 25 percent, while tour estimates can be in the range of 40 percent. Both remain short of the team equivalents in the United States.

On the ATP Tour, the nine 1000-level tournaments have a profit-sharing agreement that, in addition to prize money, gives players 50 percent of the profits under an agreed-upon accounting formula that sets aside certain revenues and subtracts certain costs, including investments the tournaments make in their facilities. The WTA does not have such an agreement. It outlines a complex prize money formula in its rule book with pages of exceptions, not based on a guaranteed share of overall tour revenues.

The tours have argued that because media rights payments constitute a lower percentage of revenues than at the Grand Slams, and because the costs of putting on tournaments are so high, a 50-50 revenue share would simply turn some tournaments into loss-making entities and make tennis unsustainable as a sport.

James Quinn, one of the antitrust lawyers hired by the PTPA, said he saw serious problems with the model, describing a structure that prevents competition from rival tournaments.

Some events outside the 52-week program of tournaments — which see players earn ranking points as well as money — have official status (the Laver Cup is sanctioned by the ATP). But the remainder, such as the Six Kings Slam in Riyadh, which debuted this year and offered record prize money of over $6million to the winner, are not sanctioned, for now providing only a peripheral form of competition to ruling bodies’ control of the sport.

Advertisement

Jannik Sinner took home the money at the inaugural Six Kings Slam in Riyadh. (Richard Pelham / Getty Images)

The Grand Slams, ATP and WTA insist this is for the best. They see themselves as caretakers of global sport trying to bring some order where chaos might otherwise reign.

Djokovic doesn’t totally disagree. He understands tennis is different from the NBA. He’s led the Player Council at the ATP, which represents male professionals, and he has seen how the sausage gets made and how complicated it is with so many tournaments of all shapes and sizes in so many countries. At the end of the day, he still thinks players deserve more than a 20-percent cut, especially since the Grand Slams don’t make the kinds of contributions to player pension plans or end-of-the-year bonus pools that the ATP does, nor do they provide the year-round support of the WTA.

“It’s not easy to get everybody in the same room and say, ‘OK, let’s agree on a certain percentage,’” he said of the leaders of tournaments.

“We want more money, (but) they maybe don’t want to give us as much money when we talk about the prize money. There are so many different layers of the prize money that you have to look into. It’s not that simple.”

(Photos: Kelly Delfina / Getty Images, Steven / PA via Getty Images; design: Dan Goldfarb)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Culture

6 New Books We Recommend This Week

Published

on

6 New Books We Recommend This Week

Our recommended books this week tilt heavily toward European culture and history, with a new history of the Vikings, a group biography of the Tudor queens’ ladies-in-waiting, a collection of letters from the Romanian-born French poet Paul Celan and a biography of the great German writer Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. We also recommend a fascinating true-crime memoir (written by the criminal in question) and, in fiction, Rebecca Kauffman’s warmhearted new novel about a complicated family. Happy reading. — Gregory Cowles

One of Europe’s most important postwar poets, Celan remains as intriguing as he is perplexing more than 50 years after his death. The autobiographical underpinnings of his work were beyond the reach of general readers until the 1990s, when the thousands of pages of Celan’s letters began to appear. The scholar Bertrand Badiou compiled the poet’s correspondence with his wife, the French graphic artist Gisèle Lestrange-Celan, and that collection is now available for the first time in English, translated by Jason Kavett.

NYRB Poets | Paperback, $28


Wilson’s biography of the German polymath Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832) approaches its subject through his masterpiece and life’s work, the verse drama “Faust” — widely considered perhaps the single greatest work of German literature, stuffed to its limits with philosophical and earthy meditations on human existence.

Bloomsbury Continuum | $35

Advertisement

Through a series of vignettes, Kauffman’s fifth novel centers on a woman determined to spend Christmas with her extended family, including her future grandchild and ex-husband, and swivels to take in the perspectives of each family member in turn.


People love the blood-soaked sagas that chronicle the deeds of Viking raiders. But Barraclough, a British historian and broadcaster, looks beyond those soap-opera stories to uncover lesser-known details of Old Norse civilization beginning in A.D. 750 or so.

Norton | $29


Fifteen years ago, Ferrell gained a dubious fame after The New York Observer identified her as the “hipster grifter” who had prowled the Brooklyn bar scene scamming unsuspecting men even as she was wanted in Utah on felony fraud charges. Now older, wiser and released from jail, Ferrell emerges in this captivating, sharp and very funny memoir to detail her path from internet notoriety to self-knowledge.

St. Martin’s | $29

Advertisement

In her lively and vivid group biography of the women who served Henry VIII’s queens, Clarke, a British author and historian, finds a compelling side entrance into the Tudor industrial complex, showing that behind all the grandeur the royal court was human-size and small.

Continue Reading

Trending