Culture
McIlroy says he used New York trip to reset after U.S. Open
NORTH BERWICK, Scotland — In the days following his heartbreaking finish at the U.S. Open, Rory McIlroy put his headphones on and wandered the streets of Manhattan and the High Line in an attempt to blend in and come to terms with what happened at Pinehurst.
McIlroy, 35, had just missed two short par putts on the final three holes to give away the 69-hole lead to eventual champion Bryson DeChambeau. The Northern Irishman quickly drove off without speaking to the media and withdrew from the next week’s tournament, making his Wednesday news conference before the Scottish Open his first time talking about the difficult finish.
“It was a great day until it wasn’t,” McIlroy said.
For much of that Sunday, McIlroy said he felt like the version of himself he had been looking to return to at major championships. He made tough putts. He took control of the tournament, entering the 15th hole with a two-shot lead over DeChambeau. Then, he bogeyed the difficult 15th hole and left himself a four-foot putt on 16.
“I can vividly remember starting to feel a little uncomfortable waiting for my second putt on 16,” McIlroy said.
GO DEEPER
Rory McIlroy and the U.S. Open he will never escape — even though he tried
He also acknowledged the nature of Pinehurst’s routing meant he was always aware of where DeChambeau’s ball was one group behind him. “It sort of got me out of my own little world a little bit,” he said. Then, he had to wait longer for the par putt as playing partner Patrick Cantlay played his shot. “And he can take his time,” McIlroy joked with a smile. He missed the putt to bogey.
McIlroy’s last major came almost 10 years ago (Gregory Shamus/Getty Images)
“You stand there, it’s hard not to either start thinking about the future or notice before Bryson’s ball is in the fairway or that sort of stuff,” he said. “But again, that’s on me to make sure that I’m in the right headspace. I hit a decent putt on 16, the green grabbed it… I probably started it straight, maybe a touch left of center, and the green grabbed it and it caught the left edge. (It) wasn’t a terrible putt but I definitely felt a little bit of uneasiness before I hit it.”
On 18, McIlroy had a tricky, quick-breaking three-foot par putt that — in hindsight — would have sent the U.S. Open to a playoff. Again, McIlroy accepted he let DeChambeau’s play affect his decision-making. As he knew DeChambau’s ball was far left of the fairway, there remained a chance the American could bogey and McIlroy could two-putt to still make a playoff. McIlroy said he had to worry about not leaving too difficult of a second putt.
“I knew I had to hit it really soft,” he added. “If the one back didn’t matter, I would have hit it firmer.”
McIlroy missed the putt, and DeChambeau got up and down from a difficult bunker shot to par and take the tournament. The next day, McIlroy withdrew from the Travelers Championship in Connecticut, but because he had plans to stop in Manhattan beforehand he kept that trip and used it as a way to refuel.
GO DEEPER
2024 Genesis Scottish Open odds, DFS picks: Morikawa, Min Woo Lee, Im among our picks
He walked around the city and called people he trusts. Other than that, he was alone with his thoughts and found things he wanted to work on going forward. Within a few days, he shifted his thoughts to the future.
“When I look back on that day, just like I look back on some of my toughest moments in my career, I’ll learn a lot from it and hopefully put that to good use,” McIlroy said. “It’s something that’s been a bit of a theme throughout my career. I’ve been able to take those tough moments and turn them into great things not very long after that.”
Lastly, McIlroy was asked if he regrets not speaking to the media after the round. He did not. “No offense,” McIlroy said with a smile, “you guys were the last of my worries at that point.”
(Top photo: Andrew Redington/Getty Images)
Culture
Can You Match the Places These Authors Lived With Settings in Their Books?
A strong sense of place can deeply influence a story, and in some cases, the setting can even feel like a character itself. This week’s literary geography quiz highlights places where authors were born (or lived) that later became locations in their books. To play, just make your selection in the multiple-choice list and the correct answer will be revealed. At the end of the quiz, you’ll find links to the works if you’d like to do further reading.
Culture
Book Review: ‘America, U.S.A.,’ by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.
AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries, by Eddie S. Glaude Jr.
For those of us in the national memory-keeping business, anniversaries hold near-totemic power. Satisfyingly round units of time, ideally bearing fancy, Latin-derived names, serve as the overburdened pegs on which to hang think pieces and museum exhibits, revisionist documentaries and maudlin public ceremonies. The arbitrary nature of such occasions is precisely what gives them their charge, inviting us to set aside complacency and submit to a comprehensive check-in.
In his new book, “America, U.S.A.,” Eddie S. Glaude Jr. presents an intriguing variation on the genre, seeing the country’s 250th birthday as an anniversary of anniversaries: 50 years since the malaise-ridden, schlock-heavy Bicentennial. A century since the subdued Prohibition-era Sesquicentennial. A century and a half since telegraphed reports of George Armstrong Custer’s defeat by the Lakota and Cheyenne at Little Bighorn rudely interrupted the Gilded Age Republic’s 100th birthday party.
If an anniversary offers a snapshot of a moment, the core of Glaude’s book is an old-timey photo album, a collection of notable episodes from earlier national reckonings, long-ago glances in the mirror. An estimable scholar of Black history, politics and religion at Princeton — best known for “Begin Again,” his 2020 meditation on James Baldwin’s relevance for our times — Glaude focuses, as his subtitle puts it, on “how race shadows the nation’s anniversaries.”
Such celebrations, he contends, have never really been the moments for honest self-reflection they are often advertised to be. Instead, the nation usually shatters the mirror, refusing to accept what it prefers not to see. “American anniversaries are often moments to turn a blind eye to the evils of the past and the present,” Glaude writes, “to suppress the fact of America’s divided soul.”
It’s a clever concept, and, needless to say, perfectly timed. Last year, Glaude notes, the Trump administration executed a hostile takeover of the government’s studiously bipartisan 250th anniversary planning. It is now preparing a program that is certain to conceal more than it reveals about the country ostensibly being celebrated.
Glaude, in no mood for celebration, argues that such omissions and evasions also defined commemorations in the past. In 1875, Frederick Douglass predicted “one grand Centennial hosannah of peace and good will to all the white race of this country.” He was right: The nation reached 100 years old at a crucial moment in the post-Civil War fight over racial equality, with white Northerners ready to give up on Southern Reconstruction. The occasion would help the once-warring sections to reunite around a shared commitment to white supremacy. On May 10, 1876, at the opening of the Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia, the police tried to bar Douglass from the grandstand, until a white politician vouched for him.
The 150th anniversary came soon after a resurgent Ku Klux Klan successfully pushed for a restrictive immigration law aimed at keeping America a “Nordic” nation. At the lavishly funded, lightly attended celebrations in Philadelphia, Black veterans of World War I were excluded from marching in the opening parade. A writer with The Associated Negro Press wondered “what was in the breast of those black men who fought to make America safe for Democracy and on Monday stood on the sidelines, forgotten, as the Nordic strode by in all his vain pride.”
By 1976, when the nation marked its Bicentennial, the violence of the ’60s had destroyed any semblance of consensus. Vietnam and Watergate had eroded trust in the government. The commission initially tasked with organizing the anniversary was disbanded amid reports of corruption. Corporations filled the vacuum, Glaude explains, with “star-spangled whoopee cushions; patriotic toilet seats; Liberty hamburgers; red, white and blue beer cans.” The author, around 8 years old at the time, dimly remembers donning a pair of tricolor trousers.
A half-century later, Glaude is refreshingly honest about the depths of his despair. “I do not love America, and never have, especially now,” he writes in one of the more startling opening sentences I’ve read in some time. He dismisses this year’s Semiquincentennial as reaching back “to a storybook America that requires either the banishment of Black people from view or the reduction of our role in the country’s history, so as to affirm America’s ongoing quest to be a more perfect union.”
Undoubtedly true. But Trump doesn’t own the country, at least not yet, nor the 250th anniversary of one of the most radically liberatory and confusingly contradictory events in world history — an inspiration, as Glaude shows, even to critical observers of the American experiment, like Douglass. Far from the revanchist MAGA-palooza in Washington, I suspect this summer’s unasked-for invitation to national soul-searching may surprise us yet.
Despite his despair, Glaude concludes that “the past still offers resources for us to freedom-dream.” So, too, does this book.
AMERICA, U.S.A.: How Race Shadows the Nation’s Anniversaries | By Eddie S. Glaude Jr. | Crown | 270 pp. | $31
Culture
Summer’s Best Beach Reads
Take me to visit a dysfunctional family with oceanfront real estate
by Meg Mitchell Moore
Moore is a dependable ingredient in any summer reading soufflé. Her airy novels accomplish what they came to do: entertain and transport, without the pyrotechnics of, say, books that eschew quotation marks. In “Down With the Shipmans,” three sisters, laden with baggage, converge on their late mother’s beach cottage, only to learn that their father and his much younger wife are planning to sell the place.
The stakes are high, the drama is juicy and the views are sublime. Moore even provides two beach dogs — Leo (an unruly pit bull mix) and Cinnamon (“golden retriever, red bandanna, long pink tongue”) — to keep things lively. (Comes out June 2)
-
Iowa44 seconds agoFormer Iowa State star Milan Momcilovic withdraws from 2026 NBA Draft
-
Kansas7 minutes ago
On the road again: Arkansas baseball heads to Kansas after brief stop in Fayetteville | Whole Hog Sports
-
Kentucky13 minutes agoMilan Momcilovic withdraws from NBA Draft, will return to college
-
Louisiana19 minutes agoSilver Alert: Assistance needed locating missing Monroe woman
-
Maine25 minutes agoRachel Carson Center for People and Nature opens in Kennebunk
-
Maryland31 minutes ago
Maryland Fishing Report
-
Michigan37 minutes agoMuskegons next big thing How Recarder Kitchen became Michigans cornerstone in 2027
-
Massachusetts43 minutes ago‘I just don’t feel it here in New England right now’: Immigrants say World Cup excitement is lacking – The Boston Globe