Culture
In ‘My Name Is Iris,’ a Mother Learns the Limits of Protectiveness

MY NAME IS IRIS, by Brando Skyhorse
In Brando Skyhorse’s second novel, a conservative Mexican American woman in an unnamed border state rebuilds her life after divorce, in an America that has become an increasingly dangerous white supremacist society.
Iris Prince believes that following the rules will save her from racism — that if she makes herself as benign and palatable as possible, she will thrive despite her brown skin and Mexican heritage. Her life is measured and calculated, and she offers the world a muted disposition and a deep desire to be unnoticed.
Her mother, Dolores, an undocumented immigrant, raised her to blend in, to be like “them” to transcend her circumstances and change her generational karma. This form of protection eventually becomes a poison. “The mask protected me and, without recognizing it, became who I was,” Iris explains matter-of-factly.
As the book title suggests, her name is critical to her narrative arc. A schoolteacher unable to pronounce her legal name, Inés, began to call her Iris instead. She and her parents accepted the renaming and Inés dissolved into the ether. Many children of immigrants will find this erasure all too familiar, as white authority figures who do not want to be inconvenienced won’t make room for people unlike themselves.
Iris’s underlying anxiety is heightened by a horrific hate crime she narrowly escaped in her childhood. But as a mother, she turns out to be not that different from her own, raising her 9-year-old daughter, Mel, to value safety and conformity. “I couldn’t unsee the chaos,” she reflects. “Had youth made those sights easier to ignore, or had I lost something essential — something alive — in me that now equated silence with security, and noise with danger?”
Motherhood can be difficult for a brown woman in the United States, even one who is comfortably middle-class, and Skyhorse turns to the conventions of the supernatural to slowly bring this alive. When Iris moves into a predominantly white suburban housing development with Mel, she begins to see a mysterious wall in her front yard grow taller every night. Frantic, she seeks help to remove it, yet no one but her daughter confirms it’s there.
The wall becomes a sort of societal gaslighting, a symbol of what we people of color know, but is not acknowledged. And it’s not merely a literary device pointing to a dystopian future; the book is being published at a time when Texas has installed razor wire and a barrier of buoys at entry points along the U.S.-Mexican border.
As the novel unfolds, we watch the development of a full-blown surveillance state. A plan to require the wearing of state-issued “bands,” as a form of identification and link to resources, is touted for its convenience and regard for the environment. But only citizens can obtain these coveted bands, and even then, the children of immigrants, like Iris, are excluded.
It’s a grim story, though humor offers some relief. Iris can be sardonic and ruthless in her observations, especially about her simple and ineffectual ex-husband. “Alex would pontificate on topics such as immigration or drug addiction,” she thinks, “only insofar as he could relate those themes to television episodes.”
She admits to enjoying social media pile-ons over a glass of white wine, and is titillated when she sees someone get arrested on the street. She’s aroused by the vitriol — until it finds her.
Skyhorse (“The Madonnas of Echo Park”) took an artistic leap writing from a woman’s point of view in this novel. A risky choice, but writing is about reaching. Iris is nuanced and compelling, though I do wish he had woven in more everyday details about being a woman that could have added texture to the character.
Still, it was satisfying to read about a demographic so often invisible, to see a community brought into focus through a woman with an inner life that is layered, confusing and at times unflattering. Narratives like this are rare, and I was grateful for it.
Erika L. Sánchez is the author of “Lessons on Expulsion,” “I Am Not Your Perfect Mexican Daughter” and “Crying in the Bathroom: A Memoir.”
MY NAME IS IRIS | By Brando Skyhorse | 257 pp. | Avid Reader Press | $28

Culture
Match These Books to Their Movie Versions

Welcome to Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about books that have gone on to find new life as movies, television shows, theatrical productions, video games and more. With the summer-movie season here, this week’s challenge is focused on novels that went on to become big-screeen adventures. Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. And scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the books and their filmed versions.
Culture
Book Review: “The Möbius Book, by Catherine Lacey

THE MÖBIUS BOOK, by Catherine Lacey
The first thing to know about “The Möbius Book,” by Catherine Lacey, is that it is actually two books. One is a novella with a hint of murder mystery. Start from the opposite side, flipping upside down — how will this work on a Kindle? — and you’ll find the other: a memoir of breakup and friendship during the pandemic, interspersed with musings on religion.
Where will bookstores put this loopy blue thing? Amazon, with unusual resourcefulness, has nested it for now under Self-Help/Relationships/Love & Loss (though I’d wager the author’s core audience avoids Amazon).
One has come to expect such formal experiments from Lacey, especially after her bravura “Biography of X”: not a biography of anyone real, but a footnoted, name-dropping, time-melting fourth novel that made many best lists in 2023.
There are plenty of names pelted into “The Möbius Book,” too — author friends like Heidi Julavits and Sarah Manguso, and many others — but one notably missing in the memoir part is that of Lacey’s ex, which gentle Googling reveals is yet another writer, Jesse Ball. Here he is referred to as The Reason: the literary-circle equivalent, maybe, of The Weeknd.
He is the “reason” why she has become a visitor to, rather than a resident of, the house they bought together, after receiving an email he sent from another room, composed on his phone, telling her he’d met another woman. (At least not a Post-it?) He is also, or so she believed, a pillar of masculine rationality. With tattoos.
The Reason has control and anger issues. He noticed when Lacey, or her memoiristic avatar, put on weight and advised her how to take it off. After they split she found it hard to eat for a time.
The Reason, unreasonably, refused to use a laptop, so she had done most of his paperwork, participating “in the long lineage of women licking stamps for their geniuses.” He once called her “a crazy, sexist autocrat” when she wanted to leave a light on in a stairwell for a female guest. Sometimes he would surprise her — “playfully,” he insisted; unpleasantly, she felt — with a smack on the rear. When not threatening or cold, he seems a little absurd in this telling, playing funeral hymns on a shakuhachi.
There was a time when such narratives were lightning bolts cast down on the world of letters, causing considerable shock waves. (I’m thinking of Catherine Texier’s 1998 “Breakup,” about the dissolution of her marriage to Joel Rose, and even Rachel Cusk’s 2012 divorce memoir “Aftermath.”) But Lacey isn’t scorching earth — she’s sifting it, flinging fistfuls of dirt and thought at us.
With characteristic keenness she notes how “The Reason’s name had burrowed into everything, like glitter in shag carpet.” How mundane language pops out with new meaning in the fog of post-relationship grief (“Even the copy on a jar of peanut butter tried to offer advice — Separation is natural”). She reflects on her religious childhood and her once-authoritarian, now-infirm father. She consults — and sometimes curses — Simone Weil, Seneca and William Gass. She hooks up with a new fellow she dubs, naturally, The Bad Idea.
Lacey runs the same list of acknowledgments and credits at the end of both novella and memoir. There are similar themes, but also an element of “Hey, you got your chocolate in my peanut butter!” in their juxtaposition. The fiction is shorter, noirish and elliptical. Was yoking it to the fiction an organic, creative act — whatever that is, we’re maybe meant to consider — or a clever packaging solution for two not-quite stand-alones?
A woman named Marie welcomes a friend, Edie, into her grim apartment on Christmas, noticing — is this a nightmare? — a pool of blood spreading outside a neighbor’s door. They both write it off as “just paint” so they can sip mezcal, eat crustless sandwiches and talk about failed relationships, some mediated or complicated through another, friend, Kafkaesquely called K.
They are both reputed in their circle to be in some kind of “crisis.” (Marie’s Crisis happens to be an excellent piano bar in the West Village of Manhattan, but, as Lacey writes, “no one cares about anyone else’s coincidences.”) Their interlocked stories drip with aphorism (“it is a fact that when one living thing rests its chin on another living thing, everything is fine”), defy summary and might all be a fever dream anyway.
“The Möbius Book” invites the reader to consider the overlaps between its two parts, an exercise both frustrating — all that turning back, forth and upside down — and exhilarating, because Lacey is imaginative and whimsical when considering reality, and sees truth in make-believe. The curving strip is like Lewis Carroll’s looking glass. Both halves share a broken teacup. Twins! A violent man. Bursts of sarcastic laughter. A dying dog (God?) with important spiritual wisdom to share.
Depending on how you twist, this book — defying the linear story, homage to the messy middle — is either delightfully neo-Dada or utterly maddening.
Or, as Lacey puts it: “Symbolism is both hollow and solid, a crutch, yes, but what’s so wrong with needing help to get around?”
THE MÖBIUS BOOK | By Catherine Lacey | Farrar, Straus & Giroux | 240 pp. | $27
Culture
Slow and Steady, Kay Ryan’s “Turtle” Poem Will Win Your Heart

You can hear a reading of this poem, and play our game, at the bottom of the page.
Poetry teems with charismatic beasts, from Shelley’s skylark to “Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers.” A comprehensive anthology of zoological verse would be fat with doggerel and birdsong, limericks and nursery rhymes, nightingales, foxes and toads.
But let’s slow down and take it one creature — and one poem — at a time. Consider the turtle, as captured by Kay Ryan.
Turtles may not have the charm or charisma of other beasts — they don’t dominate the human imagination like eagles or lions, or domesticate it like dogs or cats — but they have a notable presence in literature and myth. They are symbols of wisdom and longevity; their shells are sturdy enough to hold up the world. The cosmos, in one famous account, consists of “turtles all the way down.”
In Aesop’s fable, the turtle (traditionally called a tortoise, which is a type of turtle) is a winner, a perpetual underdog who defeats the arrogant hare. The tortoise’s slowness turns out to be a virtue.
In Ryan’s poem, the turtle’s physical attributes — her cumbersome shell and short legs, above all — seem only to be liabilities. That armor may have evolved as protection against predators, but it’s a lot of baggage for a poor, halting herbivore to lug around. Her patience isn’t going to win her any races: It’s her best response to a tough break; a way of making light of a heavy situation.
But at the same time, the poem’s mood and manner, its sense and sound, defy the constraints of turtleness. To read it a second time — or aloud — is to note how nimbly and swiftly it moves.
Want to learn this poem by heart? We’ll help.
Hearing a poem can make it more memorable. Listen to A.O. Scott read this one:
Who would be a turtle who could help it?
A barely mobile hard roll, a four–oared helmet,
she can ill afford the chances she must take
in rowing toward the grasses that she eats.
Her track is graceless, like dragging
a packing case places, and almost any slope
defeats her modest hopes. Even being practical,
she’s often stuck up to the axle on her way
to something edible. With everything optimal,
she skirts the ditch which would convert
her shell into a serving dish. She lives
below luck–level, never imagining some lottery
will change her load of pottery to wings.
Her only levity is patience,
the sport of truly chastened things.
Get to know the poem better by filling in the missing words below. Start on easy mode, and
when you’re ready, try hard mode.
Question 1/7
We’ll take it one step at a time.
Who would be a turtle who could help it?
A barely mobile hard roll, a four–oared helmet,
Tap a word above to fill in the highlighted blank.
Question 1/7
Strap in.
Who would be a turtle who could help it?
A barely mobile hard roll, a four–oared helmet,
Tap a word above to fill in the highlighted blank.
-
Arizona4 days ago
Suspect in Arizona Rangers' death killed by Missouri troopers
-
Education1 week ago
Opinion | Artificial intelligence, Trump and the Future: 13 Gen Z-ers Discuss
-
Technology1 week ago
Google is shutting down Android Instant Apps over ‘low’ usage
-
Culture1 week ago
Slow and Steady, Kay Ryan’s “Turtle” Poem Will Win Your Heart
-
News1 week ago
At Least 4 Dead and 4 Missing in West Virginia Flash Flooding
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Titan: The OceanGate Disaster Movie Review: A sobering deep dive into ambition, negligence, and tragedy
-
News1 week ago
‘No Kings’ demonstrators to gather across Greater Cincinnati in opposition to Trump
-
News1 week ago
How Many Law Enforcement Agencies Are Involved in LA Immigration Protests?