Connect with us

Culture

Book Review: ‘Air-Borne,’ by Carl Zimmer

Published

on

Book Review: ‘Air-Borne,’ by Carl Zimmer

AIR-BORNE: The Hidden History of the Life We Breathe, by Carl Zimmer


At the start of 2020, a small team of scientists tried and failed to convince public health organizations that Covid-19 was spread through the air we breathe. Why they failed, and how they ultimately won, is the subject of Carl Zimmer’s new book, “Air-Borne.”

Until 2020, explains Zimmer (a New York Times science columnist), scientists thought that respiratory diseases like Covid spread through droplets, and that these droplets had a limited range. Coughed up, they fell quickly to the ground — like “soggy raisins,” to use the vivid if disgusting terminology of a 1990s health official speaking about tuberculosis.

Thus the recommendation offered by the World Health Organization: “Maintain at least one meter (three feet) distance between yourself and other people, particularly those who are coughing, sneezing and have a fever.”

“Air-Borne” shows us how the scientific community came to understand that Covid-19 transmission was less akin to shots from a gun, and more like smog in a valley. To explain, Zimmer takes us through the history of aerobiology, and in his detailed and gripping account, he ascribes the reluctance of both the Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization to a bias born of an ancient battle between two factions known as “miasmatists” and “contagionists.”

Advertisement

According to miasmatists, bad air destroyed health. In the Middle Ages, swamps meant fever. And when Benjamin Rush looked for the cause of 1793’s deadly yellow fever outbreak in Philadelphia, he smelled bags of spoiled coffee: “Their sickness commenced with the day on which the coffee began to emit its putrid smell.”

In the 1800s, when contagionists began to see germs as culprits, their theories gained ground — partly because tools had been invented to see their postulated micro-organisms. Starting in the 1870s, Robert Koch identified the bacterium that caused anthrax, then tuberculosis and cholera.

At the same time, still more microscopic organisms were shown to be airborne. The United States enlisted Amelia Earhart to track them by plane, while on the ground William Firth Wells and Mildred Weeks Wells, a brilliant if cranky couple, not known for winning over colleagues to their unorthodox way of thinking, mapped out the ways contagions spread through public spaces like schools. Their work indicated that tuberculosis was airborne. Ditto measles, still among the most contagious diseases on record.

The Wellses hoped their research could protect the troops, warning that respiratory diseases killed more men than the Germans did in World War I. Their colleagues ignored them. The Army, however, became interested in weaponizing airborne contagion, and the Wellses had shown how droplet nuclei could spread diseases over long distances.

“The bearing of these findings on bacterial warfare is far-reaching,” wrote Theodor Rosebury (in a report written with Elvin Kaba), a dentist recruited to run the Army’s secret Airborne Infection Project. Rosebury later renounced his work, which violated the Geneva Protocol’s biological weapons ban, but his writings, per Zimmer, encouraged the Soviets to build up their biological arsenal, further encouraging the United States to build up theirs.

Advertisement

It was a Catch-22 that endangered the world and colored the way America managed public health threats. Bill Clinton, stoked in part by a fictional plot in “The Cobra Event,” took bioterrorism as a reason to further connect public health and national defense.

Under the George W. Bush administration, Zimmer writes, billions of dollars went to fight abstract threats at the expense of actual ones — like H.I.V., tuberculosis, malaria, measles and cholera — that annually kill millions.

Through the 1990s, viruses were described in terms of war — the “single biggest threat to man’s continued dominance on the planet,” in the words of the Nobel laureate Joshua Lederberg. Slowly, researchers like Linsey Marr returned to the Wellses’ work, which was rooted in community.

An environmental engineer, Marr had shifted her focus from smog to the spread of influenza in 2009, a change inspired by her son, who regularly brought home sicknesses from day care. Marr was surprised at how little we knew about how viruses were transmitted, and she worked out the math. “Every year,” Zimmer writes, “she would turn to the chalkboard in her lecture hall and derive equations to show her students that particles much bigger than five microns can readily stay in the air for a long time.” Winds, for instance, carry grains of sand.

The resistance to work like Marr’s was fierce: As Covid spread, The New England Journal of Medicine rejected her work, while Anthony Fauci discounted a warning by Lydia Bourouiba, an engineer at M.I.T. who studied turbulence and whose research showed how breath followed the physics of aerosols, or clouds.

Advertisement

The debate could seem like miasmatists versus contagionists all over again. But researchers like Marr and Bourouiba were reframing public health generally, balancing the warlike defeat of a pathogen with a focus on building safe environments. “The Covid‑19 pandemic made the ocean of gases surrounding us visible,” Zimmer writes. “Air-Borne” shows us the ways seeing where we live means listening deeply — and being prepared to see what’s perhaps never been seen.

AIR-BORNE: The Hidden History of the Life We Breathe | By Carl Zimmer | Dutton | 466 pp. | $32

Culture

Try This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies

Published

on

Try This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies

Welcome to Great Adaptations, the Book Review’s regular multiple-choice quiz about printed works that have gone on to find new life as movies, television shows, theatrical productions and more. This week’s challenge highlights thrillers first published as novels (or graphic novels) that were adapted into popular films. Just tap or click your answers to the five questions below. And scroll down after you finish the last question for links to the books and their screen versions.

Continue Reading

Culture

Test Your Knowledge of the Authors and Events That Helped Shape the United States

Published

on

Test Your Knowledge of the Authors and Events That Helped Shape the United States

Welcome to Lit Trivia, the Book Review’s regular quiz about books, authors and literary culture. In honor of Gen. George Washington’s birthday on Feb. 22, this week’s super-size challenge is focused on the literature and history related to the American Revolution. In the 10 multiple-choice questions below, tap or click on the answer you think is correct. After the last question, you’ll find links to exhibits, books and other materials related to this intense chapter in the country’s story, including an award-winning biography of the general and first U.S. president.

Continue Reading

Culture

Video: How Much Do You Know About Romance Books?

Published

on

Video: How Much Do You Know About Romance Books?

Let’s play romance roulette. No genre has dominated the books world in the last few years. Like romance, it accounts for the biggest percentage of book sales, their avid fan bases. Everyone has been talking about romance as a Book Review editor and as a fan of the genre myself, I put together a to z glossary of 101 terms that you should know if you want to understand the world of romance are cinnamon roll. You may think a cinnamon roll is a delicious breakfast treat, but in a romance novel, this refers to a typically male character who is so sweet and tender and precious that you just want to protect him and his beautiful heart from the world. Ooh, a rake. This is basically the Playboy of historical romance. He defies societal rules. He drinks, he gambles. He’s out on the town all night and is a very prolific lover with a bit of a reputation as a ladies’ man. FEI these are super strong, super sexy, super powerful, immortal, fairy like creatures. One of my favorite discoveries in terms that I learned was stern brunch daddy. A lot of daddy’s usually a male love interest who seems very intimidating and alpha, but then turns out to be a total softie who just wants to make his love interest brunch. I think there’s a misconception that because these books can follow these typical patterns, that they can be predictable and boring. But I think what makes a really great romance novel is the way that these writers use the tropes in interesting ways, or subvert them. If you can think of it, there’s probably a romance novel about it. Oops, there’s only one bed. This is one of my personal favorite tropes is a twist on forced proximity. Characters find themselves in very close quarters, where inevitably sparks start to fly. Why choose is the porkulus dose of the romance world. Sometimes the best way to resolve a love triangle is by turning it into a circle, where everyone is invited to play. Oops, we lost one spice level. There’s a really wide spectrum. You can range from really low heat or no spice, what might also be called kisses. Only then you start to get into what we call closed door or fade to Black. These books go right up to the moment of intimacy, and then you get into what we call open door, which is more explicit. And sometimes these can get very high heat or spicy and even start verging into kink. There’s one thing that almost every romance novel has in common. It’s that no matter what the characters get up to in the end, it ends with a happily ever after. I say almost every romance novel. Sometimes you’re just happy for now.

Continue Reading

Trending