Culture
At Brickyard 400, restart rule leaves Ryan Blaney wondering what could've been
SPEEDWAY, Ind. — Losing the Brickyard 400 is tough to digest regardless. When you feel like circumstances beyond your control took away a victory in what is a NASCAR crown-jewel race, it’s even more difficult.
It’s understandable then that Ryan Blaney was mad following a third-place finish in Sunday’s race at Indianapolis Motor Speedway. The defending Cup Series champion’s problem, though, was that he was uncertain where his anger should be directed.
He suffered a tough beat on a track at which every driver wants to kiss the bricks in celebration. To win here is a significant accomplishment. And Blaney had come oh so close.
“I’m ticked off, but I don’t know who to be ticked off at. Like there’s no one to be ticked off at,” Blaney said. “It’s just racing luck.
“I’m just pissed off. Just sucks, man.”
The sequence that initiated Blaney’s frustration began when Kyle Busch spun and crashed underneath Denny Hamlin as they entered Turn 3, sending the race into overtime while also further pushing limits on fuel mileage that many were already up against.
Among those in danger of running out was leader Brad Keselowski, who opted for an improbable Hail Mary, hoping he could make it to the finish, so he opted not to pit for fuel during the caution period. Sure enough, just as Keselowski was coming to the start-finish line with the race about to resume, his fuel tank ran dry, prompting him to dart into the pits just as the field came off Turn 4.
This moved Blaney into the lead, with Kyle Larson sliding into second. But Blaney had already chosen the less favorable outside lane while Larson now was positioned on the inside. NASCAR prohibits drivers from getting a do-over on lane selection, thereby giving Larson the advantage because, had he been able to re-choose, Blaney would’ve picked the inside lane.
Instead, even though Blaney was the race leader, he felt like he was effectively a sitting duck.
“I can easily say, if the leader runs out coming to the restart, wave off the green, re-choose because you’re promoting the third-place guy now to where I get screwed,” Blaney said. “I’m the one getting screwed. So the third-place guy is benefitting, the guy behind me is benefitting.
“If it was any other place, it’s not going to be as bad because the second lane, you can kind of at all the other places, you can maintain. Here, it’s just a death sentence. You’re not maintaining the lead from the top on the front row.”
As Blaney anticipated, Larson capitalized and got the lead as they sped into Turn 1. It was a lead he wouldn’t relinquish. Larson later noted he specifically chose to restart directly behind Keselowski with the hope that he’d move up to the front should Keselowski run out of fuel.
“We had a lot of communication on our radio about (how) Brad was going to be really close on fuel, he may run out of fuel under these cautions,” Larson said. “I was going to choose behind him no matter what lane he took just in hopes that he would run out before we got to the restart zone.
“Yeah, he just ducked off onto pit road. I was like, ‘Wow, I can’t believe this is going exactly how we had kind of hoped and had thought about.’”
Brad Keselowski, Ryan Blaney and Kyle Larson were 1-2-3 when Keselowski ran out of fuel and pitted. Larson then slid to the inside and ended up the winner. (Sean Gardner / Getty Images)
Some wondered post-race whether NASCAR should allow a re-choose in those situations. It’s not a question with a straightforward solution.
A notable hurdle on a 2.5-mile track like Indianapolis is the amount of time it might take to permit the field to reselect which lanes. The circumstances that arose Sunday are also not common enough to necessitate NASCAR reevaluating the rule.
“I understand it being highlighted because of it being this race, the situation, because it was front row,” said Cliff Daniels, Larson’s crew chief. “There’s been so many times in Cup races where we’ve seen that from fifth, 10th, 20th. (Today is no different.) Everybody knows that’s the rule.
“Every other racing series, you fill the row, you take the green flag and move on. I just don’t see it as that big of a concern.”
On Sunday, though, Blaney was impacted to some degree. That is indisputable. Even Larson acknowledged after the race that he benefited from Keselowski’s misfortune.
“With the way the strategy was working out, Brad running out of fuel, me inheriting the front row, a lot had to fall into place,” Larson said. “Thankfully it did.”
The victory was Larson’s first at Indianapolis, setting off a euphoric celebration that saw himself, Daniels, team owner Rick Hendrick and team executive Jeff Gordon go into the frontstretch grandstands to celebrate with fans. Larson now has won three of NASCAR’s crown-jewel races.
Meanwhile, down pit road, things were decidedly less festive. After getting out of his car, Blaney needed a moment to decompress, opting to go sit on the pit wall to gather himself.
“We should’ve won the race,” he said. “… Just disappointed. That just stinks. That’s just dumb luck. We did everything right to win and he got a break, pretty good.”
(Top photo of Kyle Larson and Ryan Blaney during Sunday’s Brickyard 400: Justin Casterline / Getty Images)
Culture
I Think This Poem Is Kind of Into You
A famous poet once observed that it is difficult to get the news from poems. The weather is a different story. April showers, summer sunshine and — maybe especially — the chill of winter provide an endless supply of moods and metaphors. Poets like to practice a double meteorology, looking out at the water and up at the sky for evidence of interior conditions of feeling.
The inner and outer forecasts don’t always match up. This short poem by Louise Glück starts out cold and stays that way for most of its 11 lines.
And then it bursts into flame.
“Early December in Croton-on-Hudson” comes from Glück’s debut collection, “Firstborn,” which was published in 1968. She wrote the poems in it between the ages of 18 and 23, but they bear many of the hallmarks of her mature style, including an approach to personal matters — sex, love, illness, family life — that is at once uncompromising and elusive. She doesn’t flinch. She also doesn’t explain.
Here, for example, Glück assembles fragments of experience that imply — but also obscure — a larger narrative. It’s almost as if a short story, or even a novel, had been smashed like a glass Christmas ornament, leaving the reader to infer the sphere from the shards.
We know there was a couple with a flat tire, and that a year later at least one of them still has feelings for the other. It’s hard not to wonder if they’re still together, or where they were going with those Christmas presents.
To some extent, those questions can be addressed with the help of biographical clues. The version of “Early December in Croton-on-Hudson” that appeared in The Atlantic in 1967 was dedicated to Charles Hertz, a Columbia University graduate student who was Glück’s first husband. They divorced a few years later. Glück, who died in 2023, was never shy about putting her life into her work.
But the poem we are reading now is not just the record of a passion that has long since cooled. More than 50 years after “Firstborn,” on the occasion of receiving the Nobel Prize for literature, Glück celebrated the “intimate, seductive, often furtive or clandestine” relations between poets and their readers. Recalling her childhood discovery of William Blake and Emily Dickinson, she declared her lifelong ardor for “poems to which the listener or reader makes an essential contribution, as recipient of a confidence or an outcry, sometimes as co-conspirator.”
That’s the kind of poem she wrote.
“Confidence” can have two meanings, both of which apply to “Early December in Croton-on-Hudson.” Reading it, you are privy to a secret, something meant for your ears only. You are also in the presence of an assertive, self-possessed voice.
Where there is power, there’s also risk. To give voice to desire — to whisper or cry “I want you” — is to issue a challenge and admit vulnerability. It’s a declaration of conquest and a promise of surrender.
What happens next? That’s up to you.
Culture
Can You Identify Where the Winter Scenes in These Novels Took Place?
Cold weather can serve as a plot point or emphasize the mood of a scene, and this week’s literary geography quiz highlights the locations of recent novels that work winter conditions right into the story. Even if you aren’t familiar with the book, the questions offer an additional hint about the setting. To play, just make your selection in the multiple-choice list and the correct answer will be revealed. At the end of the quiz, you’ll find links to the books if you’d like to do further reading.
Culture
From NYT’s 10 Best Books of 2025: A.O. Scott on Kiran Desai’s New Novel
When a writer is praised for having a sense of place, it usually means one specific place — a postage stamp of familiar ground rendered in loving, knowing detail. But Kiran Desai, in her latest novel, “The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny,” has a sense of places.
This 670-page book, about the star-crossed lovers of the title and several dozen of their friends, relatives, exes and servants (there’s a chart in the front to help you keep track), does anything but stay put. If “The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny” were an old-fashioned steamer trunk, it would be papered with shipping labels: from Allahabad (now known as Prayagraj), Goa and Delhi; from Queens, Kansas and Vermont; from Mexico City and, perhaps most delightfully, from Venice.
There, in Marco Polo’s hometown, the titular travelers alight for two chapters, enduring one of several crises in their passionate, complicated, on-again, off-again relationship. One of Venice’s nicknames is La Serenissima — “the most serene” — but in Desai’s hands it’s the opposite: a gloriously hectic backdrop for Sonia and Sunny’s romantic confusion.
Their first impressions fill a nearly page-long paragraph. Here’s how it begins.
Sonia is a (struggling) fiction writer. Sunny is a (struggling) journalist. It’s notable that, of the two of them, it is she who is better able to perceive the immediate reality of things, while he tends to read facts through screens of theory and ideology, finding sociological meaning in everyday occurrences. He isn’t exactly wrong, and Desai is hardly oblivious to the larger narratives that shape the fates of Sunny, Sonia and their families — including the economic and political changes affecting young Indians of their generation.
But “The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny” is about more than that. It’s a defense of the very idea of more, and thus a rebuke to the austerity that defines so much recent literary fiction. Many of Desai’s peers favor careful, restricted third-person narration, or else a measured, low-affect “I.” The bookstores are full of skinny novels about the emotional and psychological thinness of contemporary life. This book is an antidote: thick, sloppy, fleshy, all over the place.
It also takes exception to the postmodern dogma that we only know reality through representations of it, through pre-existing concepts of the kind to which intellectuals like Sunny are attached. The point of fiction is to assert that the world is true, and to remind us that it is vast, strange and astonishing.
See the full list of the 10 Best Books of 2025 here.
-
Alaska1 week agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Texas1 week agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
Washington6 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa1 week agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Miami, FL1 week agoUrban Meyer, Brady Quinn get in heated exchange during Alabama, Notre Dame, Miami CFP discussion
-
Iowa2 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World1 week ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans