Connect with us

Culture

As Juan Soto embarks on $765M future, Ted Williams’ shadow lingers: Where could he end up?

Published

on

As Juan Soto embarks on 5M future, Ted Williams’ shadow lingers: Where could he end up?

DALLAS — So perhaps you’re wondering this week: What would I have to do to get some baseball team to pay ME $700 million?

Hey, excellent question. And I think we’ve figured that out.

On one hand, you could be a unicorn — a once-in-a-lifetime home run hero/Cy Young starter/make-the-impossible-seem-possible kind of guy. Like Shohei Ohtani, for instance. Or …

You could just be Ted Williams.

All right, let’s take a deep breath now. It always seems sacrilegious to call Juan Soto — or anyone else — a modern-day Ted Williams. But this is the story where we let you know that it’s not as crazy as you want to believe it is.

Advertisement

The Mets obviously think so, since they just agreed to deposit $765 million in Soto’s money market account over the next 16 years. But you should know that they’re not the only team that sees this Juan Soto/Ted Williams thing. Far from it.

Consider the response from one big-league coach this week when we asked for his reaction to Soto’s staggering new contract.

“What it says to me,” he replied, laughing, “is that Ted Williams would make a hell of a lot of money if he was playing today.”

True!

Then there’s this story, told by an executive of a team that had interest in trading for Soto in 2022, when the Nationals were dangling him. Just to make sure he had the go-ahead, this exec and another high-ranking member of his front office decided they’d better run it past their owner first. This is how the exec remembers the conversation going:

Advertisement

“He (the owner) said something like: ‘I understand he’s great. But can you put in context how great he is?’

“And I said: ‘I think he’s Ted Williams.’

“And he just gave me a look like: ‘You’re a freaking lunatic.’ But I just said, ‘No, that’s kind of what he is.’”

We couldn’t have said it any better. That’s kind of what he is. He’s not Ted Williams 2.0 because nobody is. That isn’t possible. Williams finished his career with a 1.116 OPS and a .344 career batting average. Nobody is doing that in this era. Nobody.

But is Juan Soto kind of the 21st-century version of Ted Williams? There’s no getting around that.

Advertisement

If the question is more like — What hitter in the history of baseball is the most comparable to Soto through age 25? — there is only one answer. And you guessed it, Ted Williams is that answer.

Let’s show you why. It starts with …

On-base IQ at a young age


Juan Soto has a career .419 on-base percentage over seven seasons. (Luke Hales / Getty Images)

In the history of this sport, only two hitters have ever had a walk rate above 18 percent through their age-25 seasons (with at least 2,500 plate appearances). Guess who?

Ted Williams — 18.9 percent
Juan Soto — 18.8 percent

(Source: Baseball Reference)

Advertisement

Or we could look at the full array of on-base skills. To do that, let’s use a metric from Baseball Reference called OBP+ — which takes on-base percentage and adjusts it to the context of a player’s hitting environment in his era. Here’s that leaderboard through age 25:

Ted Williams — 137
Juan Soto — 131

In other words, the only two young hitters who were on-base machines at a rate that was at least 30 percent better than league average were … Williams and Soto. (Next on that list: Ty Cobb and Shoeless Joe Jackson, tied at 129.)

Or we could just consider the early-career narratives of these two guys — minus the part where Williams went off to war at age 24 and became a war-hero fighter pilot.

Before he turned 26, Williams led his league in walks twice and OBP three times, despite missing two seasons during that span in the service. Since then, only one left-handed hitter has led his league in both of those departments at least twice by age 25. Hmmm, who might that be?

Advertisement

Juan Soto would be a great guess.

There’s more, of course. But what do you think? Are we authorized to go on? Do we at least have the go-ahead to mention Soto and Williams in the same breath? We asked Diamondbacks manager Torey Lovullo for permission to do so this week, since he’s a history lover and once coached in Boston. In retrospect, he might not have been the right choice.

“I mean, Ted Williams?” Lovullo said. “My dad taught me everything about Ted Williams. That’s a tough one for me. He’s probably the greatest hitter of all time.”

So Lovullo wasn’t ready to apply that Ted Williams stamp of approval. But once he got that out of the way, Lovullo began painting the portrait of what he does see in Soto, from the perspective of a manager who has been trying to figure out how to contain him since Soto arrived in the big leagues.

“The first time I saw him, he was 20 years old,” Lovullo said. “I could not believe he was 20 years old. He carried himself like he was 30, like he had been around the league for a long time.”

Advertisement

And Lovullo means that in a way that explains why the free-agent bidding for Soto reached another orbit this winter.

“I think Soto is on a different level than the rest of the league at times,” he said. “I mean, 41 home runs, the OPS, the numbers that he has, are not lucky. It’s because he has an incredible ability to impact the baseball, and he understands what each at-bat is asking for.”

He understands what each at-bat is asking for.

With those words, Lovullo is telling us this is not a hitter who is prepared for each at-bat in the sense that he knows the pitcher has a fastball, sweeper and cutter in his arsenal. This is a hitter who prepares on “a different level.”

Kind of like a modern-day Ted Williams. That, you see, is because they both had the unique ability to see …

Advertisement

The hidden part of the game


Nationals manager Davey Martinez and Juan Soto, after he won the Home Run Derby in 2022. (Kevork Djansezian / Getty Images)

Davey Martinez was the first manager of Juan Soto’s big-league life, for five spectacular seasons in Washington. Now that Soto is back in the NL East, Martinez will get to manage against him in four series a year. He’s not looking forward to that part — but he never gets tired of watching Juan Soto, bat artist.

“Like I’ve always said,” Martinez told us, “this guy, for as young as he is — and he’s still young — he understands the hidden part of the game better than anybody I know. He really does.”

Again, we stop to point out the terminology these managers use to describe a guy who two months ago turned 26 — meaning he’s younger than the likes of Josh Jung or Spencer Horwitz or Josh Lowe. It’s not: He understands the strike zone. It’s: He understands the hidden part of the game.

And by that, Martinez said, he means: “He has a plan every pitch. Not just every at-bat but every pitch. He has a plan of what he wants to do, and you can see it.”

Rockies manager Bud Black can also see it. And he, too, described The Juan Soto At-Bat in ways that are never used to describe anyone else’s at-bats.

Advertisement

“When you use the words, plate discipline, that encompasses a lot of things,” Black said. “But for me, it’s how he conducts the at-bat, where it’s patience, but yet, you sense that he’s ready to hit. It’s sort of an instinctual thing. It’s an intangible that I think pitchers feel, and catchers feel. And the opposing manager. And the opposing pitching coach.

“There’s just something about the at-bat when it’s him up there. It doesn’t matter, it’s the same, whether it’s 7:05 (p.m.), hitting in the first inning, or at 9:30, hitting in the ninth. There’s not a difference in the quality of the at-bat.”

Like Lovullo and Martinez, Black is describing a hitter whose level of focus — on every pitch of every at-bat, of every inning, of every game, of every season — is just different. So what happens when the eye, the brain, the plan, the focus and the extraordinary bat-to-ball skills seem to be always working in sync?

You get Juan Soto … or Ted Williams.

Consider these quotes. They come from the Splendid Splinter. They could easily be his review of Juan Soto.

Advertisement

“Baseball is 50 percent from the neck up.”

“Think. Don’t just swing. Think about the pitcher — what he threw you last time up, his best pitch, who’s up next. Think.”

Sound familiar? If you’ve paid any attention when Soto is working his batter’s-box magic, it’s almost as if he’s a hitting robot, programmed by Ted Williams himself.

Said Martinez: “I tell our pitchers all the time: When you’re facing him, you need to know he’s smart. He knows what he wants to do. So if he takes a fastball, he’s looking for something. Don’t think you’re going to sneak something by him, because he’s smart. So you’ve got to be smart.”

But really, there’s more — because the Soto/Williams comparisons don’t end with this singular combination of patience, prep and focus. There’s also …

Advertisement

The power play

John Schneider also dreamed the Juan Soto dream. He is the manager of the Blue Jays, a team that pursued Soto all the way to the finish line. He had no trouble explaining exactly what they hoped they’d be buying.

“He’s a unique blend of plate discipline and power,” Schneider said. “I mean, you do not like facing it when you’re an opposing team.”

Plate discipline and power. When you combine them, and then apply them to all the young hitters in history, it once again connects the same two names: Ted Williams and Juan Soto.

Walk percentage and home run percentage through age 25

HITTER BB PCT HR PCT     BB+HR PCT

Ted Williams

18.9%

Advertisement

4.9% 

23.8%

Juan Soto 

18.8%

4.9% 

Advertisement

23.7%

(Source: Baseball Reference; minimum 2,500 plate appearances)

So there it is. There is patience. There is power. There is focus. There is damage. And there is one more thing.

The flair

It’s no secret that Ted Williams did everything — on the field, off the field — with an attitude. But Juan Soto has more than just an attitude. He has The Shuffle.

Don’t feel as if you have to take a four-minute break from this piece to watch the full, epic Soto at-bat against Hunter Gaddis in Cleveland this October. But if you do, you’ll see something that makes up the full Juan Soto Experience.

It isn’t merely that he knows what you’re trying to do to him on every pitch. He’s also going to tell you about it after every pitch … and demonstrate it, via some version of the Soto Shuffle. There is honestly nothing like this going on anywhere else in his sport.

Advertisement

“For me, it’s his way of keeping engaged,” Martinez said. “It really is. That’s how he gets back in the box and gets engaged.”

And it brings Martinez back to his favorite Soto story ever. It happened in a 2019 game at Citi Field, when Marcus Stroman, then a Met, struck out Soto in the first inning, then did an imitation of The Shuffle.

“So he comes back (to the dugout), and I said, ‘Did you see what he just did?’” Martinez reminisced. “And he said, ‘Don’t worry. I’ve got him.” Very next at-bat. He hit one a mile — and he kind of looked at Stroman like, ‘Don’t do that again.’”

Was there a Ted Williams Shuffle? Not that we know of. But there was a Ted Williams edge. And it is an unmistakable part of the Soto-Williams connection. Don’t take our word for it. Take the word of Charlie Manuel, former manager of the Phillies and a guy who played against Ted Williams early in his career.

“He’s kind of a flamboyant player,” Manuel said of Soto in 2021. “He’s very interesting. He calls attention to you with his talent. … At the same time, he’s cocky. But to me, it comes in a good way. You know, Ted Williams was very cocky, too.”

Advertisement

But you know what else Ted Williams was? A guy who played in the big leagues until he was 41. So it’s worth asking:

Where does Juan Soto go from here? 


If Juan Soto ages well, he should put up some prodigious numbers. (Cole Burston / Getty Images)

Since he’s now under contract until the year 2040, it’s worth asking: Do hitters with Juan Soto’s skill set tend to age well?

“Oh yeah, I think so,” Schneider said. “You’re only as good as what you swing at, right? And he’s pretty darned good at that.”

The truth is, history shows us he’s right. As far back as 2012, Bill Petti and Jeff Zimmerman of FanGraphs studied this very concept. They found something we should take note of — that almost no skill has tended to age better through the years than plate discipline.

Guess who looms as the ultimate example of that? Right you are. Ted Williams.

Advertisement

Even though he left baseball to head off to war two times, Williams returned — first at age 27, then at age 34 — as nearly exactly the same hitter he was before.

Take a look at his walk and home run rates through the years — since those are the rates that most resemble the profile of the young Juan Soto — and ponder whether they lay out a blueprint for what Soto might become.

AGE  BB PCT  HR PCT BB+HR PCT

Through 25

18.9% 

4.9%

Advertisement

23.8%

26-30 

22.2%  

5.0%

27.2%

Advertisement

31-35    

22.0% 

5.8% 

27.8%

36-41    

Advertisement

19.9%

5.7% 

25.6%

(Source: Baseball Reference)

You’ll notice that Williams played until exactly the same age as when Soto’s Mets contract expires — at 41. If Soto ages with even remotely similar rates … um, wow.

Advertisement

After his age-25 season, Williams added 394 home runs and 1,526 walks. If Soto ages like Williams, he’ll be somewhere in the neighborhood of 600 career homers and 2,300 career walks by the year 2040. And how many players in history have ever reached those two plateaus? Just one.

Barry Bonds.

So is that what’s out there for Soto with the Mets? Sorry. We forgot to pack our crystal balls for the Winter Meetings. But with a hitter this gifted — and this different — can we rule anything out?

“I don’t know what he’s going to do when he’s 40,” said Martinez. “But I know what he’s going to do come Opening Day.”

Hey, don’t we all. Power. Patience. And $765 million worth of Soto Shuffles — and the best Ted Williams imitation on Earth.

Advertisement
go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Inside Juan Soto landing the biggest contract in pro sports history from Steve Cohen’s Mets

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

What does history tell us about how Juan Soto will age?

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

What does Juan Soto’s record contract mean to the Mets’ payroll?

(Top image: Meech Robinson / The Athletic. Photos: Williams swinging: Diamond Images / Getty Images; Williams close-up: Getty Images; Soto close-up: Kyle Rivas / Getty Images; Soto swinging: Mitchell Layton / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Culture

Famous Authors’ Less Famous Books

Published

on

Famous Authors’ Less Famous Books

Literature

‘Romola’ (1863) by George Eliot

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

Who knew that there’s a major George Eliot novel that neither I nor any of my friends had ever heard of?

Advertisement

“Romola” was Eliot’s fourth novel, published between “The Mill on the Floss” (1860) and “Middlemarch” (1870-71). If my friends and I didn’t get this particular memo, and “Romola” is familiar to every Eliot fan but us, please skip the following.

“Romola” isn’t some fluky misfire better left unmentioned in light of Eliot’s greater work. It’s her only historical novel, set in Florence during the Italian Renaissance. It embraces big subjects like power, religion, art and social upheaval, but it’s not dry or overly intellectual. Its central character is a gifted, freethinking young woman named Romola, who enters a marriage so disastrous as to make Anna Karenina’s look relatively good.

Advertisement

It probably matters that many of Eliot’s other books have been adapted into movies or TV series, with actors like Hugh Dancy, Ben Kingsley, Emily Watson and Rufus Sewell. The BBC may be doing even more than we thought to keep classic literature alive. (In 1924, “Romola” was made into a silent movie starring Lillian Gish. It doesn’t seem to have made much difference.)

Anthony Trollope, among others, loved “Romola.” He did, however, warn Eliot against aiming over her readers’ heads, which may help explain its obscurity.

All I can say, really, is that it’s a mystery why some great books stay with us and others don’t.

Advertisement

‘Quiet Dell’ (2013) by Jayne Anne Phillips

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

This was an Oprah Book of the Week, which probably disqualifies it from B-side status, but it’s not nearly as well known as Phillips’s debut story collection, “Black Tickets” (1979), or her most recent novel, “Night Watch” (2023), which won her a long-overdue Pulitzer Prize.

Phillips has no parallel in her use of potent, stylized language to shine a light into the darkest of corners. In “Quiet Dell,” her only true-crime novel, she’s at the height of her powers, which are particularly apparent when she aims her language laser at horrific events that actually occurred. Her gift for transforming skeevy little lives into what I can only call “Blade Runner” mythology is consistently stunning.

Advertisement

Consider this passage from the opening chapter of “Quiet Dell”:

“Up high the bells are ringing for everyone alive. There are silver and gold and glass bells you can see through, and sleigh bells a hundred years old. My grandmother said there was a whisper for each one dead that year, and a feather drifting for each one waiting to be born.”

Advertisement

The book is full of language like that — and of complex, often chillingly perverse characters. It’s a dark, underrecognized beauty.

‘Solaris’ (1961) by Stanislaw Lem

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

You could argue that, in America, at least, the Polish writer Stanislaw Lem didn’t produce any A-side novels. You could just as easily argue that that makes all his novels both A-side and B-side.

Advertisement

It’s science fiction. All right?

I love science and speculative fiction, but I know a lot of literary types who take pride in their utter lack of interest in it. I always urge those people to read “Solaris,” which might change their opinions about a vast number of popular books they dismiss as trivial. As far as I know, no one has yet taken me up on that.

“Solaris” involves the crew of a space station continuing the study of an aquatic planet that has long defied analysis by the astrophysicists of Earth. Part of what sets the book apart from a lot of other science-fiction novels is Lem’s respect for enigma. He doesn’t offer contrived explanations in an attempt to seduce readers into suspending disbelief. The crew members start to experience … manifestations? … drawn from their lives and memories. If the planet has any intentions, however, they remain mysterious. All anyone can tell is that their desires and their fears, some of which are summoned from their subconsciousness, are being received and reflected back to them so vividly that it becomes difficult to tell the real from the projected. “Solaris” has the peculiar distinction of having been made into not one but two bad movies. Read the book instead.

Advertisement

‘Fox 8’ (2013) by George Saunders

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

If one of the most significant living American writers had become hypervisible with his 2017 novel, “Lincoln in the Bardo,” we’d go back and read his earlier work, wouldn’t we? Yes, and we may very well have already done so with the story collections “Tenth of December” (2013) and “Pastoralia” (2000). But what if we hadn’t yet read Saunders’s 2013 novella, “Fox 8,” about an unusually intelligent fox who, by listening to a family from outside their windows at night, has learned to understand, and write, in fox-English?: “One day, walking neer one of your Yuman houses, smelling all the interest with snout, I herd, from inside, the most amazing sound. Turns out, what that sound is, was: the Yuman voice, making werds. They sounded grate! They sounded like prety music! I listened to those music werds until the sun went down.”

Once Saunders became more visible to more of us, we’d want to read a book that ventures into the consciousness of a different species (novels tend to be about human beings), that maps the differences and the overlaps in human and animal consciousness, explores the effects of language on consciousness and is great fun.

Advertisement

We’d all have read it by now — right?

‘Between the Acts’ (1941) by Virginia Woolf

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

You could argue that Woolf didn’t have any B-sides, and yet it’s hard to deny that more people have read “Mrs. Dalloway” (1925) and “To the Lighthouse” (1927) than have read “The Voyage Out” (1915) or “Monday or Tuesday” (1921). Those, along with “Orlando” (1928) and “The Waves” (1931), are Woolf’s most prominent novels.

Advertisement

Four momentous novels is a considerable number for any writer, even a great one. That said, “Between the Acts,” her last novel, really should be considered the fifth of her significant books. The phrase “embarrassment of riches” comes to mind.

Five great novels by the same author is a lot for any reader to take on. Our reading time is finite. We won’t live long enough to read all the important books, no matter how old we get to be. I don’t expect many readers to be as devoted to Woolf as are the cohort of us who consider her to have been some sort of dark saint of literature and will snatch up any relic we can find. Fanatics like me will have read “Between the Acts” as well as “The Voyage Out,” “Monday or Tuesday” and “Flush” (1933), the story of Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s cocker spaniel. Speaking for myself, I don’t blame anyone who hasn’t gotten to those.

Advertisement

I merely want to add “Between the Acts” to the A-side, lest anyone who’s either new to Woolf or a tourist in Woolf-landia fail to rank it along with the other four contenders.

As briefly as possible: It focuses on an annual village pageant that attempts to convey all of English history in a single evening. The pageant itself interweaves subtly, brilliantly, with the lives of the villagers playing the parts.

It’s one of Woolf’s most lusciously lyrical novels. And it’s a crash course, of sorts, in her genius for conjuring worlds in which the molehill matters as much as the mountain, never mind their differences in size.

Advertisement

It’s also the most accessible of her greatest books. It could work for some as an entry point, in more or less the way William Faulkner’s “As I Lay Dying” (1930) can be the starter book before you go on to “The Sound and the Fury” (1929) or “Absalom, Absalom!” (1936).

As noted, there’s too much for us to read. We do the best we can.

Advertisement

More in Literature

See the rest of the issue

Continue Reading

Culture

6 Poems You Should Know by Heart

Published

on

6 Poems You Should Know by Heart

Literature

‘Prayer’ (1985) by Galway Kinnell

Advertisement

Whatever happens. Whatever
what is is is what
I want. Only that. But that.

Galway Kinnell in 1970. Photo by LaVerne Harrell Clark, © 1970 Arizona Board of Regents. Courtesy of the University of Arizona Poetry Center

Advertisement

“I typically say Kinnell’s words at the start of my day, as I’m pedaling a traffic-laden path to my office,” says Major Jackson, 57, the author of six books of poetry, including “Razzle Dazzle” (2023). “The poem encourages a calm acceptance of the day’s events but also wants us to embrace the misapprehension and oblivion of life, to avoid probing too deeply for answers to inscrutable questions. I admire what Kinnell does with only 14 words; the repetition of ‘what,’ ‘that’ and ‘is’ would seem to limit the poem’s sentiment but, paradoxically, the poem opens widely to contain all manner of human experience. The three ‘is’es in the middle line give it a symmetry that makes its message feel part of a natural order, and even more convincing. Thanks to the skillful punctuation, pauses and staccato rhythm, a tonal quality of interior reflection emerges. Much like a haiku, it continues after its last words, lingering like the last note played on a piano that slowly fades.”

“Just as I was entering young adulthood, probably slow to claim romantic feelings, a girlfriend copied out a poem by Pablo Neruda and slipped it into an envelope with red lipstick kisses all over it. In turn, I recited this poem. It took me the remainder of that winter to memorize its lines,” says Jackson. “The poem captures the pitch of longing that defines love at its most intense. The speaker in Shakespeare’s most famous sonnet believes the poem creates the beloved, ‘So long as men can breathe or eyes can see, / So long lives this, and this gives life to thee.’ (Sonnet 18). In Rilke’s expressive declarations of yearning, the beloved remains elusive. Wherever the speaker looks or travels, she marks his world by her absence. I find this deeply moving.”

Advertisement

Lucille Clifton in 1995. Afro American Newspapers/Gado/Getty Images

“Clifton faced many obstacles, including cancer, a kidney transplant and the loss of her husband and two of her children. Through it all, she crafted a long career as a pre-eminent American poet,” says Jackson. “Her poem ‘won’t you celebrate with me’ is a war cry, an invitation to share in her victories against life’s persistent challenges. The poem is meaningful to all who have had to stare down death in a hospital or had to bereave the passing of close relations. But, even for those who have yet to mourn life’s vicissitudes, the poem is instructive in cultivating resilience and a persevering attitude. I keep coming back to the image of the speaker’s hands and the spirit of steadying oneself in the face of unspeakable storms. She asks in a perfectly attuned gorgeously metrical line, ‘what did i see to be except myself?’”

Advertisement

‘Sonnet 94’ (1609) by William Shakespeare

They that have power to hurt and will do none,
That do not do the thing they most do show,
Who, moving others, are themselves as stone,
Unmovèd, cold, and to temptation slow,
They rightly do inherit heaven’s graces
And husband nature’s riches from expense;
They are the lords and owners of their faces,
Others but stewards of their excellence.
The summer’s flower is to the summer sweet,
Though to itself it only live and die;
But if that flower with base infection meet,
The basest weed outbraves his dignity.
For sweetest things turn sourest by their deeds;
Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds.

Advertisement

“It’s one of the moments of Western consciousness,” says Frederick Seidel, 90, the author of more than a dozen collections of poetry, including “So What” (2024). “Shakespeare knows and says what he knows.”

“It trombones magnificent, unbearable sorrow,” says Seidel.

“It’s smartass and bitter and bright,” says Seidel.

Advertisement

These interviews have been edited and condensed.

More in Literature

See the rest of the issue

Continue Reading

Culture

Classic and Contemporary Literature From France, Japan, India, the U.K. and Brazil

Published

on

Classic and Contemporary Literature From France, Japan, India, the U.K. and Brazil

Literature

FRANCE

Advertisement

According to the writer Leïla Slimani, 44, the author of ‘The Country of Others’ (2020).

Classic

‘Essais de Montaigne’ (‘Essays of Montaigne,’ 1580)

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

Advertisement

“France is a country of nuance with a love of conversation and freedom and an aversion to fanaticism. It’s also a country built on reflexive subjectivity. Montaigne reveals all that, writing, ‘I am myself the matter of my book.’”

Contemporary

‘La Carte et le Territoire’ (‘The Map and the Territory,’ 2010) by Michel Houellebecq

Advertisement

“Houellebecq describes France as a museum, where landscape turns into décor and where rural areas are emptying out. He shows the gap between the Parisian elite and the rest of the population, which he paints as aging and disoriented by modernity. It’s a melancholic and yet ironic novel about a disenchanted nation.”

JAPAN

Advertisement

According to the writer Yoko Ogawa, 64, the author of ‘The Memory Police’ (1994).

Classic

‘Man’yoshu’ (late eighth century)

Advertisement

“‘Man’yoshu,’ the oldest extant collection of Japanese poetry, reflects a diversity of voices — from emperors to commoners. They bow their heads to the majesty of nature, weep at the loss of loved ones and find pathos in death. The pages pulse with the vitality of successive generations.”

Contemporary

Advertisement

‘Tenohira no Shosetsu’ (‘Palm-of-the-Hand Stories,’ 1923-72) by Yasunari Kawabata

“The essence of Japanese literature might lie in brevity: waka [a classical 31-syllable poetry form], haiku and short stories. There’s a tradition of cherishing words that seem to well up from the depths of the heart, imbued with warmth. Kawabata, too, exudes more charm in his short stories — especially these very short ‘palm-of-the-hand’ stories — than in his full-length novels. Good and evil, beauty and ugliness, love and hate — everything is contained in these modest worlds.”

INDIA

Advertisement

According to Aatish Taseer, 45, a T contributing writer and the author of ‘Stranger to History: A Son’s Journey Through Islamic Lands’ (2009).

Classic

Advertisement

‘The Kumarasambhava’ (‘The Birth of Kumara,’ circa fifth century) by Kalidasa

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

Advertisement

“This is an epic poem by the greatest of the classical Sanskrit poets and dramatists. The gods are in a pickle. They’re being tormented by a monster, but Shiva, their natural protector, is deep in meditation and cannot be disturbed. Kama, the god of love, armed with his flower bow, is sent down from the heavens to waken Shiva. Never a wise idea! The great god, in his fury, opens his third eye and incinerates Kama. But then, paradoxically, the death of the god of love engenders one of the greatest love stories ever told. In the final canto, Shiva and his wife, the goddess Parvati, have the most electrifying sex for days on end — and, 15 centuries on, in our now censorious time, it still leaves one agog at the sensual wonder that was India.”

Contemporary

Advertisement

‘The Complex’ (2026) by Karan Mahajan

“This state-of-the-nation novel, which was published just last month, captures the squalor and malice of Indian family life. Delhi is both my and Mahajan’s hometown and, in this sprawling homage to India’s capital, we see it on the eve of the economic liberalization of the 1990s, as the old socialist city gives way to a megalopolis of ambition, greed and political cynicism.”

THE UNITED KINGDOM

Advertisement

According to the writer Tessa Hadley, 70, the author of ‘The London Train’ (2011).

Classic

Advertisement

‘Jane Eyre’ (1847) by Charlotte Brontë

“Written almost 200 years ago, it remains an insight into our collective soul — or at least its female part. Somewhere at the heart of us there’s a small girl in a wintry room, curled up in the window seat with a book, watching the lashing rain on the window glass: ‘There was no possibility of taking a walk that day. …’ Jane’s solemnity, her outraged sense of justice, her trials to come, the wild weather outside, her longing for something better, for love in her future: All this speaks, perhaps problematically, to something buried in the foundations of our idea of ourselves.”

Contemporary

Advertisement

‘All That Man Is’ (2016) by David Szalay

Advertisement

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

“Though he isn’t quite completely British (he’s part Canadian, part Hungarian), Szalay is brilliant at catching certain aspects of British men — aspects that haven’t been written about for a while, now updated for a new era. Funny, exquisitely observed and terrifying, this novel reminds us, too, how absolutely our fate and our identity as a nation belong with the rest of Europe.”

BRAZIL

Advertisement

According to the writer and critic Noemi Jaffe, 64, the author of ‘What Are the Blind Men Dreaming?’ (2016).

Classic

Advertisement

‘Memórias Póstumas de Brás Cubas’ (‘The Posthumous Memoirs of Brás Cubas,’ 1881) by Machado de Assis

Karl Leitz for Anthony Cotsifas Studio

Advertisement

“Not only is it experimental in style — very short chapters mixed with long ones; different points of view; narrated by a corpse; metalinguistic — but it also introduces an extremely ironic view of the rising bourgeoisie in Rio de Janeiro at the time, revealing the hypocrisy of slave owners, the falsehood of love affairs and the only true reason for all social relationships: convenience and personal interest. After almost 150 years, it’s still modern, both formally and, unfortunately, also in content.”

Contemporary

Advertisement

‘Onde Pastam os Minotauros’ (‘Where Minotaurs Graze,’ 2023) by Joca Reiners Terron

“The two main characters — Cão and Crente — along with some of their colleagues, plan to escape and set fire to the slaughterhouse where they work under exploitative conditions. The men develop sympathy for the animals they kill, and one of them becomes a sort of philosopher, revealing the sheer nonsense of existence and the injustices of society in the deepest parts of Brazil.”

These interviews have been edited and condensed.

Advertisement

More in Literature

See the rest of the issue

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending