Connect with us

Crypto

Financial Times: “Cryptocurrency Matters As Much to Telegram’s Bottom Line As Messaging”

Published

on

Financial Times: “Cryptocurrency Matters As Much to Telegram’s Bottom Line As Messaging”

The Financial Times (FT) recently published a report detailing the financial state of Telegram, the messaging app founded by Russian-born billionaire Pavel Durov, and cryptocurrency’s significant role in its revenue stream.

According to the FT report by Robert Smith and Hannah Murphy, which was published on August 30, Telegram’s 2023 financials, which the publication obtained, reveal that the company generated $342.5 million in revenue while incurring a substantial operating loss of $108 million. This financial report, signed by Durov and audited by PwC’s Dubai branch, highlights the increasing importance of cryptocurrency to Telegram’s business model.

A noteworthy aspect of Telegram’s revenue is its reliance on digital assets, particularly Toncoins, which were originally developed by Telegram but are now maintained by an independent open-source community. The FT report emphasizes that over 40 per cent of Telegram’s revenue comes from two specific business lines: the “integrated wallet” and the “sale of collectables,” both of which involve transactions in Toncoins. These figures underscore the extent to which cryptocurrency transactions have become intertwined with Telegram’s financial performance.

The FT also sheds light on the complexities involved in accounting for these digital assets. Telegram’s financial statements reveal that the company recorded a modest gain of $500,000 through its profit and loss (PnL) statement but a much larger gain of $86 million through other comprehensive income, all related to the revaluation of digital assets. According to the FT, these gains are the result of revaluations of Telegram’s cryptocurrency holdings, reflecting the volatile nature of the digital asset market.


Advertisement

Moreover, the FT notes that Telegram’s balance sheet is heavily weighted with digital assets, which are valued at nearly $400 million, far surpassing the company’s cash and cash equivalents. This heavy reliance on cryptocurrency presents both opportunities and risks for Telegram, particularly in light of the recent arrest of Durov in France for allegedly failing to control criminal content on the platform. The FT suggests that this arrest has had an immediate impact on the value of Toncoins, as reflected in the sharp decline in their price following the news.

In addition to cryptocurrency-related revenue, the FT report reveals that Durov himself played a significant role in Telegram’s financial activities. Last year, Durov purchased $64 million worth of Telegram’s convertible bonds and also bought $300,000 worth of Telegram Premium subscriptions, using Toncoins as payment. The FT indicates that these transactions highlight the close ties between Durov’s personal finances and the company’s operations.

The FT report also touches on the legal and regulatory challenges facing Telegram, particularly in relation to its commitment to user privacy. Telegram’s core value of protecting user privacy has made it popular among users, but it has also attracted scrutiny from authorities in various countries. The FT highlights a warning in Telegram’s financial statements that the company’s operations could be affected by changes in legal and regulatory frameworks, a concern that seems particularly relevant in light of Durov’s recent arrest.

Advertisement

Finally, the FT raises questions about Telegram’s valuation, which Durov earlier this year claimed to be “$30bn-plus.” The report suggests that this valuation might be optimistic, given the company’s reliance on cryptocurrency and the substantial operating expenses it incurs relative to its revenue. The FT concludes that while Telegram has successfully leveraged cryptocurrency to bolster its revenue, the company faces significant challenges in navigating the complex and rapidly evolving regulatory landscape.

Featured Image via Pixabay

Crypto

Strategist Warns Crypto Oversupply Could Force $10K Bitcoin Reset

Published

on

Strategist Warns Crypto Oversupply Could Force K Bitcoin Reset
Bitcoin’s explosive rally may have gone too far, with oversupply, rising volatility risk, and shifting macro forces setting the stage for a major reset that could redefine crypto’s next cycle, according to a Bloomberg Intelligence outlook.
Continue Reading

Crypto

How I accidentally turned an i24NEWS host into a meme coin – i24NEWS

Published

on

How I accidentally turned an i24NEWS host into a meme coin – i24NEWS

Cryptocurrency markets are dangerously unregulated and susceptible to fraud. 

That was the point of my report for Innov’Nation from January 6, 2026. Anyone can create a cryptocurrency token, invest heavily at the point of conception, promote it, then pull the rug- selling for a huge profit, whilst destroying the currency’s value and screwing over the investors you brought along for the ride.

The reason I did this was to bring attention to what’s known as “memecoins”. These are tokens, tied to existing cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, but given the facade of viral emblems. 

The most famous are the Elon Musk-approved Dogecoin, and cartoon-turned-right-wing dog whistle Pepe the Frog. I talked specifically about how people are manufacturing offensive memes about figures like George Floyd & Charlie Kirk and using it to promote their respective memecoins. But one little throwaway line that I said has come back to haunt me.


“Creating a cryptocurrency can take 5 minutes[…] you just need a snazzy name, like Lynncoin, a picture, a supply limit and bingo, you have created a new crypto token.”

Advertisement

Alongside this was an AI-generated image of Innov’Nation host Lynn Plagmeijer mocked up on a coin-like sphere. Lynn was sitting next to me when I generated this, and it was laughed off as nothing more than a tongue-in-cheek visual aid to show the absurdity of memecoins. And we went about our day without giving it a second thought.

Two days later, I woke up to a barrage of messages on X, formerly Twitter. Lynncoin had seemingly been wished into existence. Almost as if an angel knew that my massive ego loves being proven correctly, someone created a virtual commodity out of thin air that has the potential to defraud millions.

And this was what I was fearful of; accidentally creating a vehicle that has allowed anonymous individuals to carry out mass fraud with no retribution. Why would someone make this coin? Who is stupid enough to invest in it? And, most importantly, is it a scam?

I tracked the person who created the token on X – a French-Thai man who goes by the online pseudonym Trax. He did acknowledge that ‘most memecoins are scams’, but was adamant that his was not. He said that he created it simply because I went on television and said that the lack of regulation of memecoins means that they are likely scams. He thought it would be funny if he made a meta token, mocking my report. And, credit where it’s due, that is very funny.

To prove that it wasn’t a scam and that ‘memecoins can be used as a force for good’, Trax created a link to purchase Lynncoin on a platform called Bags, which gives creators a percentage of the transaction fees of the coin. He offered to set it up in my name – a kind, albeit unethical offer. I politely declined and said that he should give the money to charity, specifically The Auschwitz Museum (this raised $400 for Auschwitz, who have been contacted to collect their “donation”). 

Advertisement

But Trax did say that he bought at a low price, and the creation of Lynncoin was so he could piggyback on a trend and make money from it. I do not know how many Lynncoins he bought, how much profit he has made, or if he is using this as a pump and dump scheme. It could be a little bit of fun, or it could be mass fraud. And the fact I don’t know highlights the problematic lack of transparency with memecoins, and the crypto market as a whole. 

But regardless, I didn’t think Lynncoin would take off. It’s a stupid concept, and only stupid people would invest in it, right? Right?!

After a slow start, it was picked up by major X accounts who specialize in the trade of memecoins. On January 11th, the price of Lynncoin spiked to 0.0003132 USD – which may not sound like a lot, but it was an approximate 8,500% increase in a 24-hour period. So if you invested $1,000 in Lynncoin (which inexplicably, many people did), you could in theory sell for $85,000. For reference, the largest single day increase in the Dow Jones Industrial Average was 15.34% in 1933. Even Bitcoin’s record daily jump was 47% in April 2013. Yet, here you have a coin that some anonymous French-Thai guy created, bearing the face of Lynn Plagmeijer, making the most absurd jump I have ever seen.

But pride comes before the fall, and the fall was drastic. By 18:00, dozens of traders were shedding thousands of dollars selling Lynncoins, and all the gains had been wiped out. And it is impossible to find out who were the ones buying, who were the ones selling, other than an anonymous jumble of letters comprising a screen name on the tracking website Dexscreener.

In total, more than half a million dollars has been traded with Lynncoin, some making a profit, others losing a fortune. At the time of writing, the value is now a fraction of what it was, down 80-90% from its peak. In theory, it could get back to previous levels, but if it does, history shows it will not sustain. It will be a flash in the pan, whilst people pump their money into it for a few hours, create value, and sell it at a huge profit margin.

Advertisement

Pump-and-dump schemes are highly illegal, and can lead to fines and prison sentences. But the lack of transparency makes it hard to prosecute. Is Trax committing fraud? I want to believe not, he seems like a nice guy. But I cannot say for certain. And that is the crux of why I made my original report, and the major issue in this burgeoning, and highly lucrative financial industry.

Viewer makes meme coin after i24NEWS segment on crypto fraud | Innov’Nation

Pump and dumps, or rug pulls, are not new. Global icons from Javier Milei to Hailey “Hawk Tuah” Welch have been accused of scamming their supporters through crypto. Even during the brief existence of Lynncoin, former New York Mayor Eric Adams created a token, the profits of which he said would be to ‘fight antisemitism’. 

Yet just 30 minutes after he launched it, millions of dollars of liquidity was withdrawn, destroying the value of the coin before it had a chance to ‘fight antisemitism’.

Do I think you should invest in Lynncoin? That’s like asking if you should go into a casino and put all your money on the roulette table. Yes, you can win big. 

But more likely than not, you will lose even more. And, most importantly, it is a gamble, so if you do choose to invest, only put in as much as you are willing to lose. I’m sure it’s hard enough telling your loved ones that you gambled away all your money, but it would be even more embarrassing telling them you lost it on Lynncoins.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Gold and Silver Explode to Record Highs as Fed Independence Fears Ignite Safe-Haven Panic

Published

on

Gold and Silver Explode to Record Highs as Fed Independence Fears Ignite Safe-Haven Panic
Gold and silver surged to record territory as fears over U.S. monetary credibility, inflation risk, and geopolitical instability ignited aggressive safe-haven demand, pushing precious metals to the forefront of a widening global market recoil.
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending