Connect with us

Business

Do you use Zelle? Here’s how to spot increasingly common scams

Published

on

Do you use Zelle? Here’s how to spot increasingly common scams

Bank cards and digital cost apps corresponding to PayPal provide some distinct benefits over money, together with the flexibility to get better cash paid to scammers.

However Zelle, a digital cost community owned by seven main banks, isn’t so protecting of its customers.

Should you use Zelle to pay somebody who proves to be a con artist, you will have solely a slim likelihood of recovering the cash out of your financial institution. The identical is true in case you ship cash to the improper individual. Should you hit ship, the cash might be gone — simply as in case you’d misplaced a $20 invoice on the road.

On its web page for reporting scams, Zelle says: “Whereas we’re unable to help with getting your a reimbursement, it is very important us that customers have the flexibility to report this expertise. We’ll report the data you present to the recipient’s financial institution or credit score union to assist forestall anybody else from having the identical expertise.”

Advertisement

Some critics argue that Zelle and its banking companions are misinterpreting the federal Digital Fund Switch Act of 1978 and the regulation implementing it, which protect shoppers from a lot of the legal responsibility for “unauthorized” transfers. Below the legislation, an unauthorized switch is when another person initiates a switch out of your account with out your approval.

In keeping with Zelle and its companions, in case you knowingly ship money to somebody who’s taking your cash below false pretenses, that’s an approved switch below the legislation. However below a class-action lawsuit filed in Orange County, the plaintiff — a university scholar who says she was conned out of $2,150 — argues that when somebody induces you to ship them cash as a part of a rip-off, that individual is initiating a switch with out your authorization.

The Client Monetary Safety Bureau might attempt to settle this dispute, but it surely hasn’t performed so — but. “Experiences and client complaints of funds scams have risen sharply, and monetary fraud could be devastating for victims,” a CFPB spokesman mentioned in response to an inquiry from The Occasions. “The CFPB is working to forestall additional hurt, together with by making certain that monetary establishments reside as much as their investigation and error-resolution obligations.”

Kevin Roundy, senior technical director of the web safety firm NortonLifeLock in Culver Metropolis, mentioned different cost programs see extra scammers than Zelle: “There are 30 occasions as many PayPal scams as Zelle scams,” he mentioned.

“However I believe it’s [Zelle is] rising in reputation with scammers as a result of it has some important benefits from their perspective.”

Advertisement

The principle one, he mentioned, is that the cash switch is sort of instantaneous. “It doesn’t provide the alternative to hold up the telephone, give it some thought for a couple of minutes, and go ‘Oh, no.’”

What’s Zelle?

Zelle is a peer-to-peer cost system operated by Early Warning Providers, an Arizona tech firm owned by Financial institution of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, PNC Financial institution, U.S. Financial institution, Capital One and Truist. Final month it marked its fifth anniversary by asserting that it had dealt with greater than 5 billion transactions involving $1.5 trillion.

Customers enroll in Zelle by one in every of greater than 1,700 collaborating banks or by the Zelle app, then use it to ship cash immediately from their checking account to a different Zelle consumer’s checking account. The switch takes a couple of minutes or much less to finish, and usually, there are not any charges paid by both the sender or the recipient. (Zelle leaves the charges as much as its banking companions, and most of them don’t cost any, mentioned Meghan Fintland, the corporate’s senior director of exterior communications.)

The method is totally different from utilizing checks, bank cards and digital cost programs corresponding to PayPal in a minimum of two essential methods.

First, as a result of the switch goes swiftly from checking account to checking account, there isn’t a entity holding onto the cash whereas the transaction is verified or earlier than it’s collected.

Advertisement

And second, as a result of no charges are charged, Zelle isn’t increase a reserve to cowl the fraud losses incurred by shoppers on the platform. Bank card firms, in contrast, cost charges on each transaction.

Nonetheless, Zelle wouldn’t have hassle determining the place any disputed funds went. Individuals can’t accumulate cash by Zelle with out enrolling their U.S. financial institution or credit score union account into the system.

What sorts of scams are on Zelle?

Early Warning Providers touted its security document in an announcement this week, saying, “Tens of tens of millions of shoppers use Zelle with out incident, with greater than 99.9% of funds accomplished with none report of fraud or rip-off. Zelle utilization has grown considerably since its launch, from 247 million transactions in 2017 to 1.8 billion in 2021, whereas the proportion of fraud and scams has steadily decreased.”

A brand new report from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), alternatively, estimates that the variety of rip-off and fraud complaints on Zelle has elevated quickly lately. Observe that each issues might be true — as Zelle utilization will increase, the quantity of complaints about scams might rise whereas the proportion drops. Rip-off and fraud claims from Zelle customers are on tempo to extend 183% at 4 banks her workplace surveyed, from greater than $90 million in 2020 to greater than $255 million in 2022.

“More and more, clients are being defrauded by refined deceptions involving a nasty actor’s use of a good establishment’s identify or branding to induce a fraudulent cost — often known as ‘spoofing’ — or a nasty actor’s use of a client’s personal contact info to disguise a cost to the dangerous actor’s account as a cost to the patron’s account — often known as ‘me-to-me,’” Warren’s report says.

Advertisement

Sadly, these types of scams are rising more and more acquainted to anybody with a smartphone and a checking account, no matter whether or not they use Zelle, Venmo, PayPal or different cost system. In a spoofing rip-off, you’ll get an electronic mail, a textual content or a name that seems to come back from an individual or enterprise you already know, urging you to pay them by Zelle — in some circumstances, satirically, to guard your self from a purported fraud. Within the me-to-me rip-off, somebody pretending to be out of your financial institution tries to persuade you to ship cash to your self by Zelle, whereas within the course of hijacking your Zelle account along with your assist.

And even individuals who reported unauthorized Zelle transfers had hassle getting assist from their banks, Warren’s report says. Knowledge from Financial institution of America, U.S. Financial institution, PNC Financial institution and Truist point out that these clients recovered lower than half the cash they misplaced in 2021 and the primary half of 2022.

Adylia Roman of Westwood is among the Zelle customers who tried in useless to get better cash from transfers that she insists weren’t approved.

She shares a Financial institution of America financial savings account together with her son, who obtained an electronic mail from the financial institution in April notifying him of an issue with the account. When her son referred to as, Roman mentioned, the financial institution advised him about three back-to-back transfers from the account on April 18 that totaled $2,700. He knew nothing in regards to the transfers or the recipient, a lady named “Marie,” and positively by no means approved them, Roman mentioned. Financial institution of America mentioned it will examine.

A client who studies an unauthorized digital funds switch inside two days is answerable for not more than $50 of the loss, below federal guidelines. A client who waits longer to report the fraud might be answerable for as much as $500.

Advertisement

A few week later, Roman mentioned, Financial institution of America despatched a letter saying the transfers had concerned a certified system and had been validated by a certified telephone quantity — factors that Roman and her son dispute. It mentioned the case was closed, providing no likelihood to enchantment and no assist in recovering the cash from the scammer.

When she contacted Zelle, Roman mentioned, she was advised there was nothing the corporate might do. Her son, in the meantime, feels intimidated and blamed by Financial institution of America for an issue he didn’t trigger.

Betty Riess, a spokesperson for Financial institution of America, mentioned clients whose requests for reimbursement are rejected “can at all times request a further overview.” And in circumstances when clients are scammed, she mentioned, “We do attain out to the recipient financial institution to see if we will get better the cash.”

Find out how to use Zelle safely

Zelle instructs customers within the course of of creating a cost to you’ll want to ship cash solely to individuals they know and belief. It’s good recommendation, and it addresses a part of the risk posed by scammers.

“If a proposal sounds too good to be true, it most likely is,” Zelle says on its web site. “For instance, is a stranger promoting on-line live performance tickets at a steep low cost and insisting you pay with Zelle? Assume twice.” Higher but, simply say no.

Advertisement

There are different choices higher suited to buying objects and providers as a result of they’ve mechanisms for recovering your cash whenever you’re scammed. Venmo, for instance, affords one thing it calls buy safety for transactions involving items or providers. PayPal affords its personal model.

Zelle additionally tells customers to verify the recipient’s cell phone quantity or electronic mail deal with earlier than sending cash. Keep in mind, in case you make a mistake, Zelle and its banking companions will say that’s your downside, not theirs.

That leaves the specter of spoofing, wherein scammers attempt to conceal behind the names and types you “know and belief.” They achieve this by utilizing pretend electronic mail addresses and telephone numbers, or by timing a telephone name to make it seem like a response out of your financial institution to a suspicious textual content you simply obtained (that they simply despatched).

How do you guard towards these types of assaults? Consultants provide the next ideas:

If it’s an electronic mail, look fastidiously on the sender’s deal with. Spoofers typically create domains which are barely totally different from the one they’re impersonating — for instance, customerservice@wellsfrgo.com — or that use a generic area — say, wellsfargo_customer_service@hotmail.com. If the sender’s area doesn’t match the corporate’s, it’s not from the corporate.

Advertisement

Professional tip from the safety agency Kaspersky Labs: Take a look at your complete electronic mail header, in case your electronic mail software program permits you to achieve this. Official emails out of your U.S.-based financial institution mustn’t originate abroad.

If it’s a textual content warning you about Zelle fraud, don’t reply to the textual content. Name your financial institution’s fraud hotline as a substitute. Brian Krebs, a journalist who makes a speciality of on-line safety points, described how this Zelle rip-off works: The scammer sends you a textual content purportedly out of your financial institution, asking in case you’d simply tried to make a (fictitious) cost by Zelle. Should you reply, that lets the scammer know you will have a Zelle account — so the scammer then calls you, pretending to be somebody out of your financial institution’s anti-fraud unit. Then you might be requested to disclose one thing that can assist the scammer take your cash. Should you do, you’ve been had.

Scammers may also let you know that to cease the suspicious cost from being made, you should ship the quantity in query by Zelle to a protected account on the financial institution, Roundy mentioned. However that’s not a protected account — it’s the scammer’s, and you may be filling it.

Equally, Roundy mentioned, don’t use a Zelle deal with despatched in a textual content to pay a invoice. Should you get a message that purports to be from a authorities company or service supplier, and it invitations you to pay your invoice through a Zelle deal with offered within the textual content, it’s virtually actually a rip-off. “Ninety-nine p.c of the time, the professional establishments aren’t sending you a request for cost by Zelle,” he mentioned.

Extra typically, don’t reveal something to an unknown caller, texter or emailer professing to be out of your financial institution, irrespective of how persuasive their credentials are or how pressing the supposed downside with Zelle is. As a substitute, name the financial institution your self, on the quantity listed on the again of your ATM card, to see if there’s a downside along with your account. And by no means, ever, ever reveal a two-factor-authentication code you obtain out of your financial institution, even to a caller who seems to be out of your financial institution.

Advertisement

Watch how a me-to-me rip-off works, as explained by Patrick McKenzie, a software program engineer on the funds firm Stripe: You get a name from a scammer who claims to be out of your financial institution, saying that somebody has made an unauthorized switch. To cease the fraud, you might be advised, you should Zelle cash to your individual telephone quantity. The scammer says the financial institution will ship you a code through textual content to verify, which the scammer will ask you to learn aloud. Unbeknownst to you, nonetheless, the textual content out of your financial institution is definitely a two-factor-authentication code that can permit the scammer to assign a unique telephone quantity — the scammer’s — to your Zelle account. So whenever you ship cash out of your financial institution through Zelle to your self, you’re really sending it to the scammer.

Roundy mentioned Zelle “positively has nice use circumstances,” significantly whenever you’re sending cash to individuals you already know or can validate. However you should be extraordinarily cautious whenever you ship cash to an individual or enterprise “the place you’re not 100% certain of the provenance of an account.”

Extra security ideas

Taking a safety-first method to the web typically will assist shield you towards scams on Zelle and different cost platforms. This begins with utilizing two-factor authentication wherever it’s supplied to guard your accounts. And it’s safer to make use of an authenticator app in your telephone as a substitute of textual content messages because the second issue.

Should you aren’t doing it already, filter out spam calls. Fraudsters do their work at scale, spamming scores of potential victims in search of some gullible ones. The extra occasions you reply a robocall (or reply to a spam electronic mail), the extra you’ll invite the eye of different scammers.

Many smartphones working Apple or Android working programs have built-in filters for unknown callers. There are additionally quite a few apps supplied by cell phone networks and third-party builders; the Federal Communications Fee affords a partial checklist on its web site.

Advertisement

Or you would do what my spouse does, and ship each name from somebody not in her contact checklist straight to voicemail. Reliable callers will depart a message.

Don’t click on on attachments in unsolicited emails. That’s one of many most important methods on-line criminals distribute malware.

When you’re at it, don’t click on on hyperlinks in emails from unknown senders. And even in case you suppose you already know the sender, be sure to know the place the hyperlink would take you earlier than you click on on it. On a pc, you’ll be able to right-click on the hyperlink along with your mouse to repeat it, then paste it right into a textual content app to test the online deal with. Or you’ll be able to hover over the hyperlink along with your mouse, which ought to trigger the URL to be displayed in a pop-up window. On a smartphone, urgent and holding a hyperlink ought to show the URL. If the deal with begins with “http:” as a substitute of “https:”, that’s a giant crimson flag.

By no means, ever click on on a hyperlink in a textual content to reset your password. That’s “extremely probably” to be a rip-off, Kaspersky Labs warns. The corporate additionally says that monetary establishments gained’t ask for private info through textual content, in order that’s one other tipoff whenever you’re coping with a scammer.

What to do in case you are defrauded

As famous above, Zelle will subject your complaints about scammers on its web site, however you gained’t get your a reimbursement that means. Nonetheless, in case you’ve been conned into sending somebody cash below false pretenses, you’re the sufferer of against the law. So it is best to report it to legislation enforcement, together with the FBI’s Web Crime Grievance Heart.

Advertisement

If cash has been siphoned out of your checking account by a really unauthorized switch, Zelle’s coverage calls in your financial institution to cowl 100% your loss, Fintland mentioned. You need to report the switch(s) to your financial institution or, in case you signed up by the Zelle app, report it to Zelle at (844) 428-8542.

In keeping with Fintland, although, banks will first examine to find out whether or not the declare is legitimate.

That’s the place some fraud victims say they’re working into roadblocks.

Quite a few media shops have advised of Zelle customers who have been defrauded however unable to get better their funds from their financial institution. And Warren’s workplace flatly states in its report, “Banks will not be repaying clients who contest ‘unauthorized’ Zelle funds — doubtlessly violating federal legislation and CFPB guidelines.”

Frank Hirsch, a lawyer of counsel with Kaufman & Canoles, famous that there are a number of class-action fits pending from Zelle customers victimized by scammers. The plaintiffs argue that there ought to be no distinction between a fraudster who hacks into your Zelle account to siphon off cash and a fraudster who cons you into sending the cash. “In each circumstances,” Hirsch mentioned, “you’re defrauded.”

Advertisement

However the Digital Fund Switch Act was handed lengthy earlier than the industrial web existed. Hirsch predicted that the query of whether or not banks must reimburse Zelle customers for fraudulently induced transfers is “prone to persist within the courts for some time till someone says the Digital Fund Switch Act doesn’t apply or does apply.” He added, “There’s many sort of circumstances the place we’re making an attempt to outline the place the road is drawn. It’s troublesome — significantly whenever you’re speaking about new applied sciences” that entered {the marketplace} after the legislation was handed.

“However truthfully, that’s partially why we have now a CFPB, and why we have now an FTC [Federal Trade Commission], and why we have now these regulators who’re purported to attempt to suss out and clarify to the actors whether or not they must adjust to sure guidelines.”

About The Occasions Utility Journalism Staff

This text is from The Occasions’ Utility Journalism Staff. Our mission is to be important to the lives of Southern Californians by publishing info that solves issues, solutions questions and helps with determination making. We serve audiences in and round Los Angeles — together with present Occasions subscribers and numerous communities that haven’t traditionally had their wants met by our protection.

How can we be helpful to you and your group? E-mail utility (at) latimes.com or one in every of our journalists: Matt Ballinger, Jon Healey, Ada Tseng, Jessica Roy and Karen Garcia.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Business

Paramount's board approves bid by David Ellison's Skydance Media in sweeping Hollywood deal

Published

on

Paramount's board approves bid by David Ellison's Skydance Media in sweeping Hollywood deal

Tech scion David Ellison’s months-long quest to win control of Paramount Global moved closer to the finish line Sunday, in a deal that marks a new chapter for the long-struggling media company and parent of one of Hollywood’s oldest movie studios.

Paramount Global board members on Sunday approved the bid by Ellison’s Skydance Media and its backers to buy the Redstone family’s Massachusetts holding firm, National Amusements Inc., said two sources close to the deal who were not authorized to comment.

A spokesperson for Paramount declined to comment.

The Redstones’ voting stock in Paramount would be transferred to Skydance, giving Ellison, son of billionaire Oracle Corp. co-founder Larry Ellison — a key backer of the deal — control of a media operation that includes Paramount Pictures, broadcast network CBS and cable channels MTV, Comedy Central and Nickelodeon.

The proposed $8.4 billion multipronged transaction also includes merging Ellison’s production company into the storied media company, giving it more heft to compete in today’s media environment.

Advertisement

The agreement, which mints Ellison as a Hollywood mogul, came together during the last two weeks as Ellison and his financing partners renewed their efforts to win over the Redstone family and Paramount’s independent board members.

Shari Redstone has long preferred Ellison’s bid over other those of potential suitors, believing the 41-year-old entrepreneur possesses the ambition, experience and financial heft to lift Paramount from its doldrums.

But, in early June, Redstone got cold feet and abruptly walked away from the Ellison deal — a move that stunned industry observers and Paramount insiders because it was Redstone who had orchestrated the auction.

Within about a week, Ellison renewed his outreach to Redstone. Ellison ultimately persuaded her to let go of the entertainment company her family has controlled for nearly four decades. The sweetened deal also paid the Redstone family about $50 million more than what had been proposed in early June. On Sunday Paramount’s full board, including special committee of independent directors, had signed off on the deal, the sources said.

Under terms of the deal, Skydance and its financial partners RedBird Capital Partners and private equity firm KKR have agreed to provide a $1.5-billion cash infusion to help Paramount pay down debt. The deal sets aside $4.5 billion to buy shares of Paramount’s Class B shareholders who are eager to exit.

Advertisement

The Redstone family would receive $1.75-billion for National Amusements, a company that holds the family’s Paramount shares and a regional movie theater chain founded during the Great Depression, after the firm’s considerable debts are paid off.

The proposed handoff signals the end of the Redstone family’s nearly 40-year reign as one of America’s most famous and fractious media dynasties. The late Sumner Redstone’s National Amusements was once valued at nearly $10 billion, but pandemic-related theater closures, last year’s Hollywood labor strikes and a heavy debt burden sent its fortunes spiraling.

In the last five years, the New York-based company has lost two-thirds of its value. Its shares are now worth $8.2 billion based on Friday’s closing price of $11.81 a share.

The struggles in many ways prompted Shari Redstone to part with her beloved family heirloom. Additionally, National Amusements was struggling to cover its debts, and the high interest rates worsened the outlook for the Redstone family.

Paramount boasts some of the most historic brands in entertainment, including the 112-year-old Paramount Pictures movie studio, known for landmark films such as “The Godfather” and “Chinatown.” The company owns television stations including KCAL-TV (Channel 9) and KCBS-TV (Channel 2). Its once-vibrant cable channels such as Nickelodeon, TV Land, BET, MTV and Comedy Central have been losing viewers.

Advertisement

The handover requires the approval of federal regulators, a process that could take months.

In May, Paramount’s independent board committee said it would entertain a competing $26-billion offer from Sony Pictures Entertainment and Apollo Global Management. The bid would have retired all shareholders and paid off Paramount’s debt, but Sony executives grew increasingly wary of taking over a company that relies on traditional TV channels.

Earlier this year, Warner Bros. Discovery expressed interest in a merger or buying CBS. However, that company has struggled with nearly $40 billion in debt from previous deals and is in similar straits as Paramount. Media mogul Byron Allen has also shown interest.

Skydance Media founder and Chief Executive David Ellison prevailed in his bid for Paramount.

(Evan Agostini/Invision/Associated Press)

Advertisement

Many in Hollywood — film producers, writers and agents — have been rooting for the Skydance takeover, believing it represents the best chance to preserve Paramount as an independent company. Apollo and Sony were expected to break up the enterprise, with Sony absorbing the movie studio into its Culver City operation.

The second phase of the transaction will be for Paramount to absorb Ellison’s Santa Monica-based Skydance Media, which has sports, animation and gaming as well as television and film production.

Ellison is expected to run Paramount as its chief executive. Former NBCUniversal CEO Jeff Shell, who’s now a RedBird executive, could help manage the operation. It’s unclear whether the Skydance team will keep on the three division heads who are now running Paramount: Paramount Pictures CEO Brian Robbins, CBS head George Cheeks and Showtime/MTV Entertainment Studios chief Chris McCarthy.

Skydance has an existing relationship with Paramount. It co-produced each film in the “Mission: Impossible” franchise since 2011’s “Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol,” starring Tom Cruise. It also backed the 2022 Cruise mega-hit “Top Gun: Maverick.”

Advertisement

Ellison first approached Redstone about making a deal last summer, and talks became known in December.

Redstone long viewed Ellison as a preferred buyer because the deal paid a premium to her family for their exit. She also was impressed by the media mogul , believing he could become a next-generation leader who could take the company her father built to a higher level, according to people knowledgeable of her thinking.

Larry Ellison is said to be contributing funding to the deal.

David Ellison was attracted to the deal because of his past collaborations with Paramount Pictures and the allure of combining their intellectual properties as well as the cachet of owning a historic studio, analysts said. Paramount’s rich history contains popular franchises including “Transformers,” “Star Trek,” “South Park” and “Paw Patrol.”

“Paramount is one of the major historic Hollywood studios with a massive base of [intellectual property], and so it seems to us that it’s more about using the capital that Ellison has and what he’s built at Skydance and leveraging that into owning a major Hollywood studio,” Brent Penter, senior research associate at Raymond James, said prior to the deal. “Not to mention the networks and everything else that Paramount has.”

Advertisement

The agreement prepares to close the books on the Redstone family’s 37-year tenure at the company formerly known as Viacom, beginning with Sumner Redstone’s hostile takeover in 1987.

Seven years later, Redstone clinched control of Paramount, after merging Viacom with eventually doomed video rental chain Blockbuster to secure enough cash for the $10-billion deal. Redstone long viewed Paramount as the crown jewel, a belief that took root a half-century ago when he wheeled-and-dealed over theatrical exhibition terms for Paramount’s prestigious films to screen at his regional theater chain.

Under Redstone’s control, Paramount won Academy Awards in the ’90s for “Forrest Gump” and “Saving Private Ryan.”

He pioneered the idea of treating films as an investment portfolio and hedging bets on some productions by taking on financial partners — a strategy now widely used throughout the industry.

Sumner Redstone and Shari Redstone in 2012.

The late Sumner Redstone and his daughter Shari Redstone have owned a controlling interest in Viacom, which was rebranded as Paramount, through their family holding company, National Amusements Inc., since 1987.

(Katy Winn/Invision/Associated Press)

Advertisement

In 2000, Redstone expanded his media empire again by acquiring CBS, a move that made Viacom one of the most muscular media companies of the time, rivaling Walt Disney Co. and Time Warner Inc. Just six years later, Redstone broke it up into separate, sibling companies, convinced that Viacom was more precious to advertisers because of its younger audience. Redstone also wanted to reap dividends from two companies.

After years of mismanagement at Viacom, which coincided with the elder Redstone’s declining health, and boardroom turmoil, his daughter stepped in to oust Viacom top management and members of the board. Three years later, following an executive misconduct scandal at CBS, Shari Redstone achieved her goal by reuniting CBS and Viacom in a nearly $12-billion deal.

The combined company, then called ViacomCBS and valued at more than $25 billion, was supposed to be a TV juggernaut, commanding a major percentage of TV advertising revenue through the dominance of CBS and more than two dozen cable channels.

But changes in the TV landscape took a toll.

Advertisement

As consumer cord-cutting became more widespread and TV advertising revenue declined, ViacomCBS’ biggest asset became a serious liability.

The company was late to enter the streaming wars and then spent heavily on its Paramount+ streaming service to try to catch up with Netflix and even Disney. (In early 2022, the company was renamed Paramount Global in a nod to its moviemaking past and to tie in with its streaming platform of the same name.)

The company’s eroding linear TV business and the decline of TV ad revenue, as well as its struggles trying to make streaming profitable, will be major challenges for Ellison as he takes over Paramount. Though traditional TV is declining, it still brings in cash for Paramount.

And streaming is a whole different economic proposition from television, one that offers slimmer profits. Meanwhile, the company also faces larger industry questions about when — if ever — box office revenue will return to pre-pandemic levels.

“This is a company that is floating on hope,” said Stephen Galloway, dean of Chapman University’s Dodge College of Film and Media Arts. “And hope isn’t a great business strategy.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Missing the paperwork on your IRAs? All is not lost

Published

on

Missing the paperwork on your IRAs? All is not lost

Dear Liz: I have four daughters, now in their late 30s and early 40s. When they were very young, I started investing for them. As they began to earn their own money, I started Roth IRAs for them as well.

A decade ago, due to an unexpected divorce, a 30-day escrow and a move, I lost the paperwork for their accounts. After the investment company was acquired by another in 2015, I forwarded the new company’s contact information to my daughters. One transferred her account to another investment company, while her sisters left theirs in place.

Recently I found the old investment paperwork. The company has changed hands again, but the new company says it has no information about my three other daughters’ accounts. Can anything be done?

Answer: Since the latest company can’t find the accounts, your daughters should contact the escheat office of the state where you lived before your move.

Advertisement

Perhaps you didn’t update your address with the original company when you moved and the account statements or other mail were returned as undeliverable. If the company and its successor couldn’t find you — and some companies don’t look very hard — the accounts would be considered unclaimed and would have to be turned over to the state.

Links to state escheat offices can be found online at unclaimed.org, the website for the National Assn.
of Unclaimed Property Administrators.

The good news is that there’s no time limit for claiming previously unclaimed property.

The bad news is that some states will liquidate stocks and other investments after escheatment. If that’s the case, then the three daughters who didn’t move their accounts will have missed out on nearly a decade of investment returns.

Dear Liz: Is it common for a brokerage agreement to say the firm can close my account for any reason and without any notice? The agreement goes on to say that the brokerage can liquidate the investments in my account if it’s closed and that the brokerage is not responsible for any investment losses that result.

Advertisement

Answer: The short answer is yes — brokerage accounts can be closed at any time by the firm or by the client.

Such agreements often specify certain actions that can trigger a closure, such as failing to maintain a minimum required balance. But the agreements also typically have language that allows the brokerage to close your account at any time and for any reason.

Brokerages don’t commonly close customer accounts. If yours does, however, move quickly to transfer your investments to another firm.

Failure to act could result in your investments being liquidated, and you would owe capital gains taxes on any appreciation in their value.

Dear Liz: You have written that non-spouse beneficiaries are now required to drain their inherited IRAs within 10 years. Is this requirement retroactive?

Advertisement

I inherited an IRA from my mother in 2015. I have been taking out the minimum required each year. If I must drain the account within 10 years, will the increase in yearly income affect my Social Security benefits?

Answer: The 10-year requirement applies only to accounts inherited from people who died after Dec. 31, 2019.

IRA distributions don’t affect Social Security benefits, but could affect Medicare premiums if the withdrawal is large enough. Taxable income above certain limits triggers a Medicare surcharge known as an income-related monthly adjustment amount, or IRMAA.

Dear Liz: My husband passed away 10 months ago. I applied for widow benefits.

The Social Security Administration sent me a letter that said they cannot pay because my Social Security benefit would equal two-thirds of the amount of my pension. Please help me with this.

Advertisement

Answer: This is known as the government pension offset, and it applies to people who receive a pension from a job that didn’t pay into Social Security. Any survivor or spousal benefits you might receive are reduced by two-thirds of the pension amount. In your case, your entire benefit was offset.

People are understandably upset to learn they don’t qualify for survivor or spousal benefits through Social Security. But since your pension is large enough to offset any benefit, you’re financially better off with the pension than without it.

For more information, see the government pension offset pamphlet, available online at SSA.gov/pubs or by calling the Social Security Administration toll-free at (800) 772-1213.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

California’s workplace violence prevention law is now in effect. Here's how it changes things

Published

on

California’s workplace violence prevention law is now in effect. Here's how it changes things

Beginning this month, California businesses will be required to have plans in place to prevent violence in the workplace.

Senate Bill 553, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom last fall, requires that employers develop plans to protect workplaces from foreseeable threats of violence, which can range from bullying and harassment to active shooter and hostage situations. Under the law, employers were to have these comprehensive plans in place by July 1.

Here’s what you should know about the new law:

Who pushed for the workplace violence prevention law, and why?

State Sen. Dave Cortese (D-San Jose), who wrote the legislation, said he began looking into regulating workplace violence after a major shooting in 2021 at a light-rail yard roiled his district. In the incident, an employee killed nine colleagues at the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority before taking his own life.

Surveying the scene soon after the shooting, Cortese said he felt there could have been a clear plan for how workers might respond in such a situation. “It would have saved lives,” he said.

Advertisement

Cortese said the requirements outlined by the law took cues from a regulation the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health had been in the process of developing. Their safety standard, however, given their lengthy rule-making process and bureaucratic delays, probably would have taken several more years to get final approval.

More than half of such shootings in 2021 occurred in places of commerce, including grocery stores and manufacturing sites, according to the FBI.

SB 553 was backed by several unions, among them the United Food and Commercial Workers Western States Council. The union sought a law that would help address what it described as a rash of violent attacks at grocery stores and pharmacies, as workers were being pressured by their employers to crack down on shoplifting.

Grocery and other retail workers who interact with the public have long worried about violence in the workplace. Notably, they faced harassment and at times assault from customers who refused to comply with mask mandates in the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fast-food workers also have complained of violent and dangerous customers.

Did anyone oppose the legislation? If so, why?

Industry groups such as the National Retail Assn. had vehemently opposed SB 553, arguing the paperwork would be overly burdensome for businesses.

Advertisement

They also took issue with a provision the bill had in its early stages that prohibited businesses from requiring nonsecurity employees to confront shoplifters and active shooters. That language was later removed. Eventually, the trade groups dropped their opposition.

What exactly is required under the law?

Legal experts said many companies had already started loosely addressing workplace violence concerns as mass shootings and other violent incidents dominated headlines over the years. The law helps to clarify employers’ obligations in this arena, experts said.

The law defines four types of workplace violence employers should try to prevent: violent action by a third-party person with no real reason to be at the worksite — essentially, a stranger showing up and harming an employee; violence by parties that are entitled to be there, such as customers, clients, patients or other authorized visitors; violence committed against employees by another employee; and violence by a third party who has a romantic or other personal relationship with an employee.

Under the law, most California businesses with at least 10 employees are required to have a policy document identifying potential violence and plans to deal with it — either as a standalone document, or as part of an existing injury and illness prevention policy.

They must also make workers aware of the violence prevention plan through annual training, and maintain a log of incidents of violence over a minimum of five years.

Advertisement

What else should I know about the law?

The law makes it easier for employees — or the unions that represent them — to get temporary restraining orders if they are threatened by a coworker or someone else in the workplace.

“That’s a big thing — most employees don’t get to choose who they work with or what happens at work,” said Ian A. Wright, a labor and employment attorney at Alston & Bird. “It gives employees an additional form of protection that they can go and seek themselves.”

Noncompliance could be met with civil penalties, and businesses that haven’t yet implemented the law are already several days past the deadline.

“My advice would be to get it done as soon as possible,” Wright said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending