Connect with us

Wyoming

Trans Woman Faces Assault Charges For Self-Defense, Despite Wyoming’s “Stand Your Ground” Law

Published

on

Trans Woman Faces Assault Charges For Self-Defense, Despite Wyoming’s “Stand Your Ground” Law


Sign up for The Agenda, Them’s news and politics newsletter, delivered Thursdays.

A trans woman in Wyoming is facing two felony charges — aggravated assault and possession of a deadly weapon with unlawful intent — after pulling out a gun on someone who had pushed her to the ground, per journalist Jeff Victor of The Laramie Reporter.

Rihanna Kelver was standing outside the Crowbar & Grill in Laramie, Wyoming, when a man — whom local state news publication Cowboy State Daily identified as Scott Durham —  began to shout homophobic and transphobic slurs at her. Durham later shoved Kelver to the ground with such force that she injured her tailbone, per court testimony and surveillance footage detailed in the affidavit reviewed by The Laramie Reporter, which initially reported the altercation.

In response, Kelver drew a pistol from her bag, put in a round and pointed the weapon at Durham, which caused him to flee. Kelver, per The Laramie Reporter, kept the safety on and never fired.

Advertisement

Despite Wyoming’s “Stand Your Ground” statute, which allows people to use reasonable force in moments of self defense, Kelver faces up to 15 years in prison for both charges, as well as up to $11,000 in fines, per Cowboy State Daily. Kelver faces an additional year and $1,000 fine for a charge of interference with a peace officer.

Per the statute, “A person who uses reasonable defensive force … shall not be criminally prosecuted for that use of reasonable defensive force.”

According to video evidence detailed in court documents reviewed by The Laramie Reporter and Slate, Kelver was “alone, outnumbered, physically assaulted and left on the ground facing multiple aggressors,” as Durham was not alone during the incident.

Despite the overwhelming evidence that Kelver acted in self defense, a judge at a pretrial hearing agreed with the charges against Kelver, forcing her to go to trial.

Some of the facts of the case are disputed, per Cowboy State Daily, including Durham’s claim that Kelver initially approached him and that Durham only shoved her because she was the aggressor, despite Durham admitting this was a “three-on-one” situation, with the numbers stacked against Kelver.

Advertisement

Police who reviewed the footage wrote that Kelver approached Durham and that Durham pushed Kelver, per the affidavit.

Kelver allegedly said that she “did not recall pulling the firearm during the altercation.” Kelver said she had the gun for personal safety, having been stalked just the night before.

Per Cowboy State Daily, the charges against Kelver have changed multiple times. In November, Albany County Attorney Kurt Britzius lowered the charges from two felonies and a misdemeanor to two misdemeanors: reckless endangering and interference.

Kelver wrote a letter to Judge Robert Sanford apologizing for using the gun.

“I do not wish to spend any time attempting to garner sympathy nor victimhood,” Kelver wrote, per a court file reviewed by the Daily. “I wish to offer my sincerest apologies and condolences to your court and to my community.” She added she was “deeply sorry.”

Advertisement

However, following that letter, negotiations fell apart and the felony charges were reinstated in March.

“I fully respect the legal process and intend to address the facts in court, not necessarily anymore in the media,” Kelver told the Daily over the phone. “I did not go looking for confrontation. I genuinely believed my safety was threatened and my actions were taken in response to that threat.”

Once the facts are heard, she added, “it will be clear that this was a defensive response to a frightening situation. I just ask that people not rush to judgment based on incomplete information.”



Source link

Advertisement

Wyoming

Wyoming lawmakers consider energy deregulation for data centers, industrial power

Published

on

Wyoming lawmakers consider energy deregulation for data centers, industrial power


CASPER, Wyo. — The Wyoming Joint Minerals, Business and Economic Development Interim Committee is considering a proposal to exempt some electricity generators from public utility regulations to meet power demands from state industries.

The draft bill would allow electricity producers to operate outside utility rules if they serve one customer with a demand of at least 25 megawatts. It would also apply if they serve up to four customers with a combined demand of at least 100 megawatts. A staff alternative would limit the exemption to new or expanded power demands after July 1, 2027.

Supporters said utility rules slow economic growth and fail to meet the needs of industrial consumers.

“The facts on the ground have not changed,” said Pete Obermueller, president of the Petroleum Association of Wyoming. “We are in a situation where electricity customers in the entire state essentially are facing one of three, and in some cases multiple, problems as it relates to electricity price, capacity and reliability.”

Advertisement

Jody Levin, representing the Wyoming Mining Association and the trona industry, said her sector is vulnerable to power disruptions. She said the industry can’t rely on the alternate draft that only addresses future load growth. A recent 15-minute power disruption damaged a boiler, took a plant offline for three months and cost revenue, she said.

“We are not asking for widespread deregulation, but we are asking for when you find yourself in these very challenging situations, you can’t get power, you’re seeing reliability disruptions, when is it appropriate for you to then have a mechanism to protect your operations,” Levin said.

Mary Throne, representing data center developer Prometheus Hyperscale, the developer behind the proposed 1.5-gigawatt data center project straddling the Natrona-Converse county line, also supported the bill.

“I think generation flexibility is necessary to meet the demands of data center development,” Throne said. She said third-party generation is a tweak to the utility model.

Utilities opposed the legislation. They said bypassing the grid could leave residents to pay the costs.

Advertisement

Thom Carter, representing Rocky Mountain Power, said the current draft fails to protect customers from the financial risks of stranded assets or the costs of maintaining backup power reserves.

“Both versions … do not exempt the risk for if you’re going to leave,” he said, adding that without protections, “my current ratepayer then has to carry the cost and the risk for the backup.” Carter said the company is developing an alternative to offer different tools for varying load sizes.

David Bush of Black Hills Energy said the bill could threaten the company’s power contract tariff in Cheyenne. The tariff uses industrial growth to keep base rates low for other customers, a tool that’s been cited by Cheyenne city leaders as being directly responsible for protecting ratepayers amid the city’s recent data center industry’s growth.

Rural electric cooperatives also opposed the draft bill. They said they’re already developing tariffs and micro-grid concepts to serve customers quickly without legal changes.

Chris Petrie, deputy chairman of the Wyoming Public Service Commission, said his agency is working on rules to create a designation for non-public utility generators. Utilities have a legal obligation to serve their territories, he said.

Advertisement

“The idea here is that we want safe, adequate, and reliable service at just and reasonable rates to be available everywhere in the state,” he said.

The committee opted to carry the bill forward to its next meeting in August without making any immediate amendments.

Rep. Martha Lawley, R-Big Horn/Washakie counties, introduced a motion to advance the bill using only the first option of the draft, but withdrew it after legislative staff said no motion was needed to advance a bill as-is.

The committee also supported a motion by Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Laramie County, to draft a second bill to put the Public Service Commission’s proposed rules into law. The senator said the new draft would “provide some statutory authority which is more powerful than rulemaking” and give the Legislature a vehicle to solve the issue.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Wyoming lawmakers reject upfront bonding for industrial projects, advance state fund alternative

Published

on

Wyoming lawmakers reject upfront bonding for industrial projects, advance state fund alternative


CASPER, Wyo. — State lawmakers rejected a proposal to require industrial companies to post bonds for upfront impact assistance to local governments.

The Joint Minerals, Business and Economic Development Interim Committee let the draft bill die without a motion during its recent meeting. Lawmakers instead advanced an alternative that uses state funds to help communities facing financial strain from industrial projects before construction begins.

The defeated draft bill, 27LSO-0021, would have authorized prepayments to local communities, but it required the permit applicant to submit a bond to cover that amount.

Mills Mayor Leah Juarez told the committee the current system is broken because towns must wait for construction to start before receiving funds. She said Mills is waiting on hundreds of thousands of dollars for the delayed Dinosaur Solar Energy Project and Settler wind developments.

Advertisement

“Mills can’t afford this. We can’t afford to keep shouldering this burden,” Juarez said.

She echoed earlier comments from Natrona County Commissioner Dave North that cities and towns often enter contracts for expensive equipment long before a project breaks ground. He called for upfront funding, specifically pointing to long lead times to purchase fire trucks and ambulances.

He said local governments just want an advance on future tax revenues.

“We are not asking for anything additional from the companies at this point in time,” he said, suggesting a prepayment of up to 50% might be appropriate rather than the 20% cap in the draft bill.

Rep. Jayme Lien asked the committee to mandate a 100% upfront bond.

Advertisement

“Without adequate upfront resources, our citizens suffer things like overcrowded schools, strained emergency response, deteriorating roads, increased pressure on housing, infrastructure,” Lien said. “The upfront payment ensures accountability. If the project does not proceed responsibly, the bond is available to mitigate harm.”

Industry advocates and some lawmakers opposed the bonding suggestion. Holland & Hart LLP attorney Cindy DeLancey, who represents industrial clients, said Wyoming competes with neighboring states to attract large facilities.

“To add additional burdens in the process, additional costs … really undermines that position that we’re trying to signal to the world that we want business in Wyoming,” DeLancey said.

Rep. Christopher Knapp, R-Campbell County, said he was initially interested in the original bill but withdrew his support when the bonding requirement was introduced. He also spoke against the bill draft that provides upfront payments to local governments from state legislative reserve funds, thereby placing the risk on the state. The state would then recoup the funds through withheld payments once the project begins.

Knapp said the state shouldn’t bear the financial burden for speculative improvements or equipment, adding there are alternative funding avenues available to communities, such as the State Loan and Investment Board.

Advertisement

“When it comes to a very specialized piece of equipment, often times industry themselves provide that equipment on site,” he said, citing Campbell County’s coal mines as an example.

Sweetwater County Rep. J.T. Larson said lawmakers shouldn’t fear investing in the state’s communities.

“If a project falls through, why are we afraid? We’re helping those local communities get something they need or replace something that they have needed to replace for many years,” he said.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Wyoming

Wyoming reports first rabies case of season in Sheridan County

Published

on

Wyoming reports first rabies case of season in Sheridan County


Wyoming saw its first rabies case of the season in Sheridan County, the state’s Department of Health reported Wednesday.

The case was reported in May in Sheridan County. A rabid bat was found in the backyard of a home in a downtown residential neighborhood, according to the health department.

Humans and pets can become infected from bites and scratches of an animal with rabies. Rabies is not spread through the touch of an infected animal or its feces or urine.

Bat bites are not always visible. Anyone who has direct contact with a bat or who wakes up with a bat in their room should immediately contact a doctor or public health provider for assessment.

Advertisement

There were six confirmed cases of rabies in Wyoming animals last year.

Tips for preventing rabies:

  • Don’t touch or feed wild or stray animals.
  • Treat animal bites with soap and water and contact a medical professional immediately.
  • People waking to find a bat in their room or a child’s room should contact a medical professional immediately.
  • Vaccinate dogs, cats, ferrets, horses and other selected livestock for rabies and keep vaccinations up to date.

For more information about rabies exposure in Wyoming, please visit:

https://health.wyo.gov/publichealth/infectious-disease-epidemiology-unit/disease/rabies/ [links-2.govdelivery.com]





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending