News
Video: Welcome to the Neighborhood. It’s Sinking.
“OK, don’t step into the actual fissure. We don’t actually know how deep it goes.” In 2024, Eilen Stewart bought a house on a landslide. “Honestly, we’re priced out of a lot of the L.A. area. So when we saw this house in this amazing neighborhood — it’s safe. It’s beautiful. It’s got amazing school districts. I mean, it just seemed like this house is half the price that it should be. Of course, that’s when we figured out that there’s a reason that the house is this price.” Land here was moving as much as a foot per week around that time. But this house seemed OK, so Eilen and her husband went for it, paying $1.3 million, a deal for coastal Palos Verdes, Calif. “We knew there was a landslide, but we made a calculated risk. And we’ll see if it pays off or not.” Parts of Palos Verdes have been inching towards the sea for decades, but heavy rainfall in recent years accelerated the landslide, cracking foundations and destroying homes. “This is probably one of the largest active landslides with homes on it in the entire United States, if not the world. It’s almost like a giant raft that’s moving on this real slippery layer at depth.” “The movement has always been here. It’s just been at an acceptable level. But once anything has started moving, it’s very, very difficult to stop.” “For longtime residents like Tim Kelly, who bought his home here in 1994, leaving would mean a massive financial hit. Landslides generally aren’t covered by insurance. “So prior to the landslide, my house was — based on Zillow and Redfin and all those — was at approximately $2.1 million. It’s been reassessed on the L.A. County tax rolls at $129,000. All right, guys. 7:01, we’re late. We’re late.” With little choice but to stay put and a deep love for their neighborhood, Tim and a crew of dedicated neighbors are trying to slow down the landslide by drying it out. Every morning, they fire up generators for wells that pump water out of the ground. “Putting in de-watering wells is one of the primary approaches to slow the slide down. And we’ve seen a dramatic reduction in movement as a result of taking those measures. In some areas, we’ve reduced the movement by almost 90 percent at its peak.” Last winter was also less rainy than the two before, another factor. Gas and electricity were cut off to many in 2024, and residents have had to go off grid. Some families have left altogether for safety reasons. Nearly two years later, 172 homes are still disconnected from grid power, including Eilen’s. Her land has also moved a lot since she moved in. “When we first moved in, you could see maybe this much of the ocean. It was kind of a little tiny sliver. But all of those homes that are in front of us sunk down a good 10 feet. And part of the silver lining is that we have a much better view now.” Eilen estimates she spent about $200,000 on landslide-related fixes, including picking up the house, placing it on steel beams and moving it away from the slide. But all of this might just be delaying the inevitable. “You’re fighting nature, and what we see is that nature is changing with climate change and maybe more rainfall occurring in the future. We do have means and methods to tackle that. It’s just very expensive.” As of June this year, Palos Verdes will have spent about $65 million on landslide mitigation since 2022. Its entire annual city budget is about $40 million. “We’re aggressively trying to get money from the state and federal government to be able to solve the problem and implement the solutions that we have. But we need more to keep going.” At least 11 homes have sold in the landslide zone since 2024. Last summer, the city banned future new construction here. But anybody is still free to move in. “It’s buyer beware, right, because you’re coming into an area that the land is going to be moving forever. But if they want to then it’s their choice.” “If the house slid down the hill tomorrow, what would you do?” “I would put up a tent in that backyard and still live here.”
News
Senate Republicans grow increasingly frustrated with Trump blindsiding them
WASHINGTON — As President Donald Trump scrambles to wrap up his war with Iran, he’s escalating another one much closer to home, against members of his own party in Congress.
From the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit in France, Trump ordered the Senate on Wednesday to cancel an afternoon hearing for Jay Clayton, his nominee to be director of national intelligence, and threatened not to sign a reauthorization of a critical surveillance law unless the Senate passed a sweeping election bill that has already failed — repeatedly.
The hearing delay not only blindsided and frustrated Senate Republicans, but it also completely derailed Majority Leader John Thune’s carefully laid plans to fast-track the nomination in a bid to unlock Democratic votes for the now-expired spying program.
Asked why Trump would pull the rug out from under them, Thune, R-S.D., said, “Good question.”
The Clayton incident isn’t the first time in recent weeks Trump has made Thune’s life more difficult.
Asked whether Trump and Senate Republicans are on different pages, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, replied, “It may not be so much a different page, but he’s turning it ahead without telling us about it.”
The already fragile relationship is nearing a breaking point as Trump uses his clout to knock out senators in primaries, issue unachievable demands and repeatedly force the caucus into politically fraught positions. A number of Republican senators have expressed confusion, since his actions make it harder for them to push the White House’s own agenda forward.
“It’s undermining our ability to produce the very results he wants,” said retiring Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C. He called the Clayton postponement “a colossal mistake.”
GOP leaders pleaded with Trump to nominate a permanent national intelligence director after his acting pick, Bill Pulte, created a bipartisan firestorm on Capitol Hill over his lack of national security experience. Pulte is a close Trump ally and housing official who has pushed for mortgage fraud investigations into the president’s perceived enemies.
Once it became clear GOP leaders were looking to move Clayton’s nomination quickly — meaning Pulte would never step foot in the full-time role — Trump decided to throw a wrench into the process.
On Wednesday, after Trump instructed the Senate to stall his own nominee, some of his Republican allies said they’ve never seen anything like it before.
“No. I’ve only been in the Senate for 11 years, so no, I haven’t,” said Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., who is running for re-election with Trump’s endorsement.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement: “The White House and President Trump have enjoyed working closely with Leader Thune and Senate Republicans to deliver on many important promises to the American people, including the largest tax cut for working Americans in history, and the Secure America Act that fully funds the President’s border security agenda. We look forward to continuing these close relationships and fulfilling President Trump’s priorities that Americans elected him to enact.”
Some rank-and-file Trump allies are trying to steer clear of the clashes.
“You could probably talk to other people around here. I don’t get caught up in, like, the palace intrigue,” Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., said when he was asked about Trump’s pushing to stall Clayton. “They tend to generally work themselves out.”
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton, R-Ark., repeatedly declined to answer questions from reporters Wednesday but, in announcing he would postpone the Clayton hearing, called the delay “regrettable.”
Cotton’s Democratic counterpart on the committee, Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., said that “this is not a problem between Democrats and Republicans in the Senate,” placing the blame squarely on Trump.
“He threw a live hand grenade into this whole process,” Warner said.
It was just the latest instance in recent weeks of Trump’s timing disrupting his own agenda on Capitol Hill. His requests for $1 billion in ballroom security money delayed the ICE and Border Patrol funding bill. His administration’s announcement of a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund to compensate allies stalled it even further. And his choice of Pulte came days before the FISA Section 702 program expired, ending any hopes of a deal by last Friday’s deadline.
Adding to Republican frustration was Trump’s move to oust Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, with his endorsement of state Attorney General Ken Paxton in the primary. Not only is Cornyn well-liked among his colleagues, but GOP strategists also fear Paxton’s nomination will make it tougher to hold the seat this fall, boosting Democrats’ chances of winning control of the Senate.
“It’s not about sympathy; it’s about basically being able to function,” Cornyn said when he was asked whether he’s sympathetic to Thune’s situation. “I think part of the problem is not President Trump, it’s us making unrealistic promises, and then when they’re not attained, then criticizing one another.”
For Trump’s allies, the small slights are adding up. On Monday, when senators arrived at the Capitol for afternoon votes, they were flying blind in the face of questions about the emerging Iran deal. They weren’t given details, even as many of them have been asking to see the text of the memorandum of understanding. The White House sent them talking points later that evening, after they spent hours walking around the Capitol and addressing reporters.
Asked Wednesday early afternoon about the memorandum of understanding with Iran, Schmitt replied, “The MOU that no one’s seen?”
Even Thune appears to have been left in the dark.
“We haven’t seen anything yet, so there’s nothing really at this point to react to,” he told reporters of the memorandum of understanding Tuesday morning, though Trump had announced the 60-day ceasefire Sunday.
A senior U.S. official provided NBC News with a copy of the memorandum of understanding Wednesday, saying the U.S. originally held back on releasing the text at the request of Iran.
Much of the tension stems from Trump’s inability to secure his top legislative priority of passing the SAVE America Act, a sweeping election law to impose voting limits in every state. Democrats vehemently oppose it, ensuring it can’t get the 60 votes needed to pass the Senate. And most GOP senators are resolute in their opposition to abolishing the filibuster — another persistent Trump demand — seeing it as a long-term protector of conservative priorities.
Trump has also tried — and failed — to get Republicans to fire the parliamentarian, essentially the Senate’s referee, who has determined that the bill is ineligible for a simple-majority vote under Senate rules. And in a clear rebuke to Trump, his allies’ attempts to add it to the ICE and Border Patrol funding bill this month couldn’t even get 50 votes, losing four Republicans and failing 48-50.
“The only way you could get there is to undo or get rid of the legislative filibuster, and there aren’t even close to the votes here in the United States Senate in order to achieve that,” Thune told reporters this month of the SAVE America Act. “It’s not something that we’re going to be able to get done absent having an election, electing some more Republicans.”
Asked Wednesday about the Trump-Thune tensions, Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., said that Thune speaks for the Republican conference and that nobody is vying to replace him. She said Thune is right to candidly tell Trump the votes aren’t there to pass the election bill.
“He should be as frank as he’s being,” Lummis said. “My favorite saying: Tell the truth; it’s easier to remember.”
News
How Republicans Are Breaking Up Majority-Black Districts
After the Supreme Court weakened the Voting Rights Act in late April, Republican lawmakers across the South scrambled to redraw their states’ congressional maps.
The court’s decision allowed Republicans, who hold supermajorities in legislatures across the South, to go after more Democratic-held House districts, extending a lengthy tit-for-tat redistricting battle with Democrats that had seemed at an end. While Republicans said they were focused only on partisan advantage, not race, the changes effectively targeted areas where Black voters form the majority.
The effort angered many Black Democrats, who accused conservatives of intentionally undermining their voting power in a region with a painful history of discrimination. Voting remains racially polarized in the South, so Black voters have historically backed Democrats.
Here’s a look at how Louisiana, Alabama and Tennessee broke up majority-Black districts. At least one other Southern state, Georgia, aims to follow suit before the 2028 election.
Louisiana
Louisiana’s former congressional map was at the center of the case before the Supreme Court, which declared the map an illegal racial gerrymander. The new map targeted the Sixth Congressional District, a fairly new majority-Black seat that included the capital, Baton Rouge.
About a third of voters in Louisiana are Black.
Black outlines indicate majority-Black districts.
Distribution of Black voters in …
How Black voters were redistributed in Louisiana
During the debate over redistricting, the president of the State Senate, Cameron Henry, a Republican, told reporters, “If you’re taking the variables in place, such as incumbency, such as party, into some of the factors, you don’t have a lot of options.”
Where more Black or white people live
Where Trump orHarris got more votes
Most of the changes center on Black — and mostly Democratic — voters who live around Baton Rouge. The district lines, however, largely preserve the New Orleans-area majority-Black seat held by Representative Troy Carter, a Black Democrat.
Alabama
After the Supreme Court ruling, Alabama asked the courts to allow the state to use a map that the legislature approved in 2023 but that was later rejected by a federal court. The Birmingham-based federal court had ordered Alabama to draw a map with a second majority-Black district or something “close to it.”
More than one in four Alabama residents are Black.
Black outlines indicate majority-Black districts.
Distribution of Black voters in …
How Alabama dissolved one of its two Black voting strongholds
An independent special master drew a new district that stretched from the capital, Montgomery, through the region known as the Black Belt for its rich, loamy soil, to Mobile, a coastal city.
Outside the South, “there’s not that history of racial animus and racial discrimination towards blocking or minimizing your vote,” said Representative Shomari Figures, a Black Democrat who won the new majority-Black seat in 2024 only to see it redrawn to favor Republicans in 2026.
Where more Black or white people live
Where Trump orHarris got more votes
Republicans said the 2023 map would ensure representation for the Gulf Coast region of the state because it did not split Mobile from the rest of Mobile County. This month, the Supreme Court said Alabama could use it.
That leaves the state with one majority-Black district, which includes the city of Selma. That seat is held by Representative Terri Sewell, a Black Democrat.
Tennessee
After the Supreme Court ruling, Tennessee was the first state to draft and approve a new congressional map that went after its one majority-Black seat, the Ninth Congressional District.
That district included the city of Memphis, where more than half of the state’s Black population lives. The new map split the Memphis area into three districts.
Black outlines indicate majority-Black districts.
Distribution of Black voters in …
How Tennessee broke up its only majority-Black district
The Ninth was one of the few majority-Black districts represented by a white lawmaker, Representative Steve Cohen. Mr. Cohen, a Democrat who had retained significant support among Black voters since his first election in 2006, said he would not seek re-election.
Where more Black or white people live
Where Trump orHarris got more votes
There is no longer a single majority-Black district in Tennessee.
News
President Trump calls to delay nomination of intel pick Jay Clayton
Clayton will appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday for a confirmation hearing to be Director of National Intelligence. Above, Clayton testifies before the Senate Banking Committee during his confirmation hearing to be chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2017.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
President Trump says he is delaying the nomination of Jay Clayton to be the next director of national intelligence and disrupting approval of a surveillance tool at the center of the U.S. intelligence apparatus in order to pressure the Senate to advance another nominee and approve a long-stalled voting bill.
Trump’s attempt to derail the confirmation came as a surprise social media post in the middle of the night less than 12 hours before Clayton is scheduled to appear before a Senate committee. Trump issued his demands in a post just before 4 a.m. eastern on Truth Social. Trump is currently at the G7 Summit in France.
In the post, Trump said the plan to quickly approve Clayton was part of a deal with Democrats to derail his previous, temporary pick, Bill Pulte, who has no intelligence experience and has been criticized as a political attack dog for the president. He went on to say he is demanding that reauthorization of the surveillance tool known as FISA Section 702 must be tied to an unrelated package of voting restrictions that has previously failed to advance in the Senate.
“Regarding the approval of our Great Patriot, Jay Clayton, we are cancelling the Senate Hearing RE: DNI today, and will not be going forward until Jamie McDonald is approved to be U.S. Attorney. In the meantime, Bill Pulte will remain as the Acting Director of National Intelligence. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump concluded.
It is a dramatic reversal for a nomination that had the potential to speed through the Senate, possibly with bipartisan support.
Who is Jay Clayton?
Clayton currently serves as a federal prosecutor, in charge of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. In that role, he’s overseen a number of high-profile cases including the indictment and arrest of former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. He was previously confirmed by the Senate to serve as the head of the Securities and Exchange commission during President Trump’s first term.
The director of national intelligence leads the intelligence community across 18 agencies and organizations and advises the president on national security issues, including through drafting and delivering the President’s Daily Brief.
Senate lawmakers hoped for a speedy confirmation for Clayton, aiming to have him sworn in by June 19, the date that President Trump has said that his controversial pick for acting director, Bill Pulte, will step into the role on a temporary basis.
Controversy over Bill Pulte, Trump’s interim pick
Pulte’s appointment earlier this month was met with dismay on Capitol Hill. He currently serves as director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and would enter the job with no national intelligence experience.
He has used his current sub-cabinet level role to assail the president’s perceived foes. He was a cheerleader for Trump’s pressure campaign that sought to push then-Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell to resign. Pulte has also used his social media following to broadcast accusations that several of the president’s perceived enemies had committed mortgage fraud, including Fed official Lisa Cook, New York’s Democratic Attorney General Letitia James and Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. Each has denied wrongdoing.
Given his record, Democrats and even some Republicans worry he will weaponize the key national security role. The uproar over Pulte contributed to the expiration on Friday of a nearly two decade-old spy law that underpins a great deal of U.S. intelligence gathering.
The president has suggested that Pulte will serve in the role for some amount of time. Trump told the Wall Street Journal he hopes to see Pulte declassify documents related to the 2020 election and downsize the agency.

Pressure to move quickly
Senators appeared highly motivated to move Clayton quickly through the process before Trump’s sudden intervention. They had hoped to prevent or minimize Pulte’s time in the job. Clayton’s confirmation hearing date was set within hours of his nomination to the post.
If confirmed, Clayton would succeed outgoing director Tulsi Gabbard, who announced her resignation last month citing her husband’s cancer diagnosis.
During her brief tenure, Gabbard had been a controversial director. A former Democrat, she was nominated to the role despite her lack of experience in U.S. intelligence and remarks supporting autocratic leaders in Syria and Russia. She was ultimately confirmed in a near-party line vote.
While serving as director of national intelligence, charged with presenting an objective view of the U.S. intelligence community’s assessments to policymakers including the president, Gabbard attended an FBI raid on a Georgia election office that has been at the heart of Trump’s baseless election fraud conspiracy theories.
-
Technology2 minutes agoTim Cook says RAM expenses are ‘unsustainable’ and Apple is going to raise prices
-
World9 minutes agoFinland’s parliament votes to lift decades-old ban on nuclear weapons in historic NATO defense shift
-
Politics12 minutes agoTrump switches support in Oklahoma congressional race as formerly endorsed pastor candidate suspends campaign
-
Health17 minutes agoCure for certain cancers is ‘realistic’ goal in next decade, pharma lead says
-
Sports24 minutes agoTNA Wrestling hit with wave of departures
-
Technology27 minutes agoThief uses Waymo as a getaway car
-
Business32 minutes ago
Rivian lays off hundreds of workers days after new vehicle deliveries begin
-
Entertainment39 minutes agoWalter Parazaider, saxophonist and Chicago co-founder, dead at 81