Connect with us

Illinois

Rising e-bike crashes prompt Illinois to launch new safety initiative

Published

on

Rising e-bike crashes prompt Illinois to launch new safety initiative


Illinois’ Secretary of State announced a new traffic safety program on Wednesday. It focuses on fast e-bikes, scooters and other electric devices that can go more than 50 miles per hour. He said the law hasn’t kept up with these devices and kids are getting hurt.

Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias announced the “Ride Safe, Ride Smart, Ride Ready” initiative in Chicago alongside lawmakers, police leaders, bike advocates, doctors and students.

Advertisement

What we know:

He pointed to federal data showing that injuries and deaths from these electric devices have gone up 300% across the country in just three years, from 2019 to 2022. Illinois has also had several serious deaths. A teenager in Mount Prospect was killed when his e-bike hit a pickup truck. An Illinois State University official died after being hit by an e-bike rider in Bloomington-Normal.

The new program wants to make the rules clearer for fast electric devices. It will add more traffic safety education in Illinois schools. It will also give communities and police better guidance on how to keep riders and walkers safe without banning e-bikes completely.

Advertisement

Officials said they want to move fast in the 2026 legislative session. That’s because faster and heavier devices keep showing up on streets, sidewalks and bike paths, and there aren’t many statewide rules right now.

Where the state wants to change

State leaders say Illinois law right now treats some slower devices more strictly than much faster ones. This creates confusion for families and the police.

Advertisement

Low-speed e-bikes that max out at 28 miles per hour already have three categories in Illinois law. These categories include age restrictions. But officials say some faster electric bikes, scooters and “emotos” that can go over 50 miles per hour basically have no state rules at all. There are no age limits.

“There are actually no regulations or age restrictions for any type of electric unicycles or skateboards,” Giannoulias said at the event. He called the current mix of state and local rules “the upside down.”

Advertisement

The Secretary of State’s office plans to work with lawmakers to:

  • Update the Illinois Vehicle Code to clearly define different types of electric devices and set basic statewide rules for high-speed models.
  • Consider age limits, licensing or permits, and possible insurance requirements for certain devices.
  • Make it clear where different devices can legally be used. This includes city streets, bike lanes, sidewalks and trails.

The effort will be led in Springfield by State Sen. Ram Villivalam, who leads the Senate Transportation Committee, and State Rep. Barbara Hernandez of Aurora. Hernandez said her office has been flooded with complaints about teens on fast e-scooters and e-motorbikes in suburban neighborhoods.

Villivalam called these electric devices “the future” for many riders who need cheaper and cleaner transportation. But he warned that some devices now move as fast as motorcycles without the same rules.

Advertisement

“This program is about updating our approach to electric devices with clear and consistent statewide rules,” he said. That way, new technology on the street doesn’t hurt public safety.

Rising injuries, especially for kids

Doctors say they are already seeing the impact in emergency rooms.

Advertisement

Dr. Christine Sislak is the head of pediatric emergency medicine at Lurie Children’s Hospital. She told the crowd that kids have always fallen off bikes and scooters, but the injuries look different now.

She said children thrown from high-speed e-bikes and scooters are showing up with broken facial bones, knocked-out adult teeth, and serious arm and shoulder breaks. Some need surgery instead of a simple cast. She also described cases of skull fractures and serious brain injuries.

Advertisement

“These things are life-changing,” Sislak said. “They try it once. That’s it. Life has changed.”

In many cases, she said, the devices are birthday gifts. Kids take their first ride the same day. Sometimes they have a friend sitting on the back. They crash before they fully understand how fast the bike or scooter can go.

Sislak said she believes many parents simply do not realize the risk or the speed of the devices they are buying.

Advertisement

State officials say that’s part of why the new program focuses so much on clear rules and education, not just tickets.

New lessons for Illinois students

A major piece of the plan is aimed at changing how young people learn about traffic safety.

Advertisement

Jennifer Brown is president of the Illinois High School and College Drivers Education Association. She said her group is working with the Secretary of State’s office to create new lessons for high school driver education classes.

The updated curriculum is expected to cover:

Advertisement
  • How different types of electric devices are classified and what they can do.
  • Existing state laws that apply to e-bikes, scooters and other electric devices.
  • How drivers and riders should safely share the road with each other.

“The first part of this partnership focuses on electric devices within high school driver education,” Brown said. “Through this education, drivers and riders learn how to safely share the road. Safety works best when everyone understands their role.”

The plan also calls for expanding a state program that teaches K-8 students about walking and bicycle safety. This way, younger students learn basic walking and biking skills long before they drive a car or use an electric device.

A separate “traffic safety leadership” part will push high school students to take on more active roles teaching their peers. Brown brought three teenagers from Gillespie High School to the announcement. These students have already worked on teen traffic safety projects and helped shape the new plan.

Advertisement

“This is what it looks like when students aren’t just taught safety. They actually lead it,” Brown said.

Community-based enforcement and police concerns

Police leaders at the event said they want clearer rules and better tools to prevent crashes. But they also said the focus should be on education and getting people to follow the rules on their own.

Advertisement

Joe Leonas is president of the Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police and police chief in Lincolnshire. He said the new guidelines are meant to help officers work more directly with parents and riders, not just write more tickets.

“Keeping people safe starts with education and prevention, not just enforcement,” Leonas said.

Advertisement

He joked that his goal as a police chief is to see “boring behavior” on the street. His two-hour drive to the event, he said, was “nice” precisely because nothing surprising happened and he arrived safely.

Giannoulias picked up that line and said the state could easily adopt “Be safe, be boring” as an unofficial motto for kids on fast e-bikes and scooters.

The program includes a community enforcement plan. It will pair police with local partners to set practical guidelines. The idea is to find problem spots and patterns. For example, teens racing emotos through trail systems or adults riding motorcycle-style devices on narrow lakefront paths. Then they can step in early.

Advertisement

Giannoulias mentioned hearing from residents about electric unicycles zipping along city walkways at around 40 miles per hour. He also heard about motorcycles using Chicago’s lakefront trail like it was a road.

Not a ban on e-bikes

Throughout the announcement, state leaders and advocates stressed that they are not trying to outlaw e-bikes or other electric devices.

Advertisement

Dave Simmons is the executive director of Ride Illinois, a statewide bike group. He said his organization supports keeping existing laws that protect the use of low-speed, legal e-bikes. He wants to keep those devices allowed on bike paths and lanes.

“Someone riding an e-bike is not cheating,” Simmons said. “They’re simply using a less common mode to go places.”

Advertisement

He said that responsible use of legal e-bikes can help people who don’t own cars, who can’t drive, or who have trouble getting around. And they don’t add pollution or traffic.

But Simmons said Illinois needs to draw a clear legal line between those low-speed e-bikes and larger, faster devices that look similar but act more like motorcycles.

Officials said the program is meant to bring clarity and consistency. It’s not meant to stop the growth of electric devices.

Advertisement

“Today is not about getting rid of electric devices,” Giannoulias said. “It’s about understanding that things have changed, and it’s important for us to provide some guidelines.”

What happens next

The “Ride Safe, Ride Smart, Ride Ready” program is still in its early stages. The specific details of the bill haven’t been released yet.

Advertisement

Giannoulias said his office is looking at how other states have tried to regulate electric devices. He mentioned New Jersey as one example of an aggressive approach that created confusion and problems. He said Illinois hopes to avoid that while also going beyond states that have done very little.

The Secretary of State’s office expects to work with lawmakers from both parties, police, doctors and advocacy groups over the coming months to write legislation for the 2026 session.

Advertisement

Officials didn’t give a firm timeline for when new rules or class changes might take effect. But they said work on education materials is already happening.

In the meantime, the state has launched a public information website, ilsos.gov/OneRoad. It has explanations of current laws for electric devices and safety tips for riders, drivers, teachers and parents.

The Source: This story contains reporting from Fox Chicago’s Terrence Lee.

Advertisement

TransportationNewsIllinoisChicago



Source link

Illinois

Who is running for Illinois governor in 2026? What to know as primary Early Voting sites open

Published

on

Who is running for Illinois governor in 2026? What to know as primary Early Voting sites open


With Election Day for the 2026 Primary quickly approaching, many voters are considering who to mark their support for when they cast their ballot.

There are several big races on the ballot, including the gubernatorial race that has the potential to make history.

Though rumors are swirling that sitting Governor J.B. Pritzker has his eyes on a potential run for president in 2028, he’s still in the running for re-election. If he retains his seat, he’ll be the first Democratic governor to secure a third term in office in Illinois history.

While Pritzker is the only Democrat aiming for governor on the ballot, there is a slew of Republican candidates vying for a face-off with the incumbent in November.

Advertisement

Voters with their mind made up on which candidate they support can head to their local early voting site to cast their ballot before Election Day.

Though downtown sites and some across the suburbs have been open since early February, early voting sites will open in all 50 of Chicago’s and in several suburb on Monday, March 2.

For those still deciding how to mark their ballot, here’s a look at the gubernatorial candidates.

Democrats:

Governor J.B. Pritzker and Christian Mitchell

Current Governor of Illinois J.B. Pritzker is taking aim at a third term, promising to continue building on the work of his first two terms. According to his campaign website, some of his intentions for a third term include “[tackling] the affordability crisis,” continuing to protect access to reproductive health care in Illinois, and investing in education.

Advertisement

Chrisitan Mitchell is running alongside Pritzker for lieutenant governor. After representing the 26th District in the Illinois House of Representatives from 2013 to 2019, Mitchell served as deputy governor to Pritzker from 2019 to 2023. Mitchell led efforts to ban assault weapons, make Illinois a leader in clean energy and create jobs through infrastructure projects as deputy governor, according to his campaign bio.

Republicans:

Ted Dabrowski and Dr. Carrie Mendoza

Ted Dabrowski is a Wilmette resident and former president of Wirepoints, a media outlet focused on conservative economic policies and financial data. From 2011 to 2017, Dabrowski worked as a spokesperson and Vice President of Policy at the Illinois Policy Institute, a right-leaning think tank.

Dabrowski, who has never previously held political office, aims to cut and cap property tax rates, veto any and all tax increases, and repeal both Illinois’ sanctuary laws and zero-emissions energy policy, according to his campaign website.

“We must return power to the people, remove barriers to prosperity, embrace educational freedom, push political power down to its lowest level and restore the rule of law,” his campaign website says.

Advertisement

Dr. Carrie Mendoza, a Chicago-native with more than 25 years of experience as a physician, is running to be Dabrowski’s lieutenant governor, according to her campaign biography. Like Dabrowski, Mendoza has never held political office. Her campaign biography says she is “driven by innovation and a passion for justice.”

James Mendrick and Dr. Robert Renteria

The first Republican candidate to enter the race, DuPage County Sheriff James Mendrick is campaigning on a push for public safety initiatives.

Sheriff since 2018, Mendrick has partnered with DuPage County Health Department to provide Medicated Assisted Treatment to inmates fighting opioid addiction and advocated for the use of a drug deactivation pouch system to protect people and the state’s waterways from dangerous medications, according to his campaign website.

“He is committed to ending soft-on-crime policies, defending parental rights, and delivering quality education to every child in the state,” his campaign website says.

Advertisement

Dr. Roberta Renteria veteran of the U.S. Army and is a prolific author and activist, according to his campaign biography.

“Dr. Renteria uses his personal story, business acumen and leadership skills to address bullying, gangs, violence, drugs, suicides and school dropout,” his campaign biography says. His books and curriculums are taught in 25 countries around the world, and he has given many Ted Talks.

Darren Bailey and Aaron Del Mar

Former state senator Darren Bailey, who unsuccessfully ran for governor of Illinois in 2022, is giving another go at assuming the political seat. A third-generation downstate farmer, Bailey’s campaign is focused on reducing government spending, cutting taxes, and cracking down on crime, according to his campaign website.

In addition to his farm work, Bailey founded a private Christian school with his wife Cindy.

Advertisement

He fought against spending, raising taxes and sanctuary state policies while in the Illinois House and later in the State Senate.

Aaron Del Mar is an entrepreneur who became the youngest-ever Councilman for the Village of Palatine at 29 years old in 2016. He oversees public safety and infrastructure and guides community organizations in the position, according to his campaign biography.

Rick Heidner and Christina Neitzke-Troike

Though businessman Rick Heidner has never held office, he has led several notable companies, including Gold Rush Gaming, Ricky Rocket’s Fuel Centers, Prairie State Energy, and Heidner Properties, according to his campaign website.

A lifelong Illinoisian, Heidner is “running to make Illinois safe again, affordable again, and full of opportunity again,” his website says.

Advertisement

Christina Neitzke-Troike is looking to step up into the lieutenant governor seat from her current role as Mayor of Homer Glen after nearly two decades in several elected positions.

Neitzke-Troike hopes to bring her “unparalleled understanding of how state mandates affect local budgets, property taxes, and public services” to Springfield, according to her campaign biography.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Illinois

As Trump launches Iran attack, here’s what Missouri and Illinois legislators are saying

Published

on

As Trump launches Iran attack, here’s what Missouri and Illinois legislators are saying


Members of the Missouri and Illinois congressional delegations are split over President Donald Trump’s decision to attack Iran.

And some Democrats are criticizing Trump for launching the attack without conferring with Congress — and before lawmakers could vote on a war powers resolution that would have restricted the president from using force against Iran.

American and Israeli troops launched airstrikes around Iran on Saturday. In a statement posted on Truth Social, Trump cited Iran’s refusal to abandon its nuclear weapon and ballistic missile programs as rationale for the attack. The Republican chief executive added that “the lives of courageous American heroes may be lost and we may have casualties that often happens in war, but we’re doing this not for now.”

“We’re doing this for the future, and it is a noble mission,” Trump added.

Advertisement

Early reaction to Trump’s decision among Missouri and Illinois political figures broke down along party lines.

Jason Rosenbaum

/

St. Louis Public Radio.

Congressman Mark Alford, R-Missouri, speaks on Feb. 21 at Missouri Republican Party Lincoln Days in Springfield. Alford released a statement supporting Trump’s decision to attack Iran.

Congresswoman Ann Wagner, R-Missouri, said in a statement that “for nearly fifty years, the Islamic Republic of Iran has proven itself to be utterly committed to violence, chaos, and instability.” Wagner, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, added that “the United States, along with the support from many of our allies around the world, will no longer allow this regime to wreak havoc at will.”

Advertisement

“As the President stated, Operation Epic Fury is a clear and necessary action to raze the Iranian ballistic missile industry to the ground, annihilate the Ayatollah’s navy, and ensure Iranian terrorism and nuclear threats can no longer destabilize the globe,” Wagner said. “The multiple statements of support from across the Western world illustrate the importance of this action.”

Wagner is alluding to how the leaders from a number of countries, including Canada, Australia and Ukraine, backed Trump’s decision to attack Iran.

U.S. Rep. Mark Alford, R-Missouri, said in a statement on X that he backed Trump’s “swift and bold action to finally hold the regime accountable.”

“The Iranian regime is the world’s leading state sponsor of terror, a destabilizing force across the region, and a threat to U.S. allies, interests, and bases in the Middle East,” Alford said. “Tehran is directly responsible for the deaths of countless Americans over the years.”

“As I’ve said for weeks, through either the easy way or the hard way, the Ayatollah needs to go,” Alford added.

Advertisement

Missouri Congressman Sam Graves said in a statement that Trump “took decisive action to protect our service members, our homeland, and our national security before that threat could grow.” And Congressman Mike Bost, R-Illinois, applauded President Trump acting decisively to protect America’s national security interests.

“God bless our military men and women in harm’s way; may the uncertain days ahead lead to a lasting peace for years to come,” Bost said.

U.S. Rep. Mary Miller, R-Illinois, said Trump has “taken decisive action to defend America’s interests and confront those who threaten our security.”

“As our elite Armed Forces carry out Operation Epic Fury in Iran, we lift up our brave service members and the allies standing beside them in prayer for their safety and success in the mission,” Miller said in a statement on X.

Senator Dick Durbin, D-Illinois, speaks to reporters outside the Democratic luncheon on Tuesday, April 16, 2024, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. House Republicans sent articles of impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to the Senate.

Eric Lee

Advertisement

/

St. Louis Public Radio

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois, speaks to reporters outside a Democratic luncheon in April 2024 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.

Durbin, Pritzker decry decision

Democrats representing Illinois and Missouri roundly condemned Trump’s decision to attack Iran, including Illinois Sens. Dick Durbin and Tammy Duckworth.

Duckworth said in her statement that “too many Americans believed him when he promised that he would get our nation out of foreign wars and bring prices down for families.” The Democratic lawmaker added Americans “can clearly see with their own eyes that he was lying”

“Instead, Donald Trump chose to put American lives and national security at risk while threatening to draw us into yet another expensive, taxpayer-funded forever war without Constitutionally-required authorization, a defined end-state or a real plan to prevent the instability that could come next,” Duckworth said. “He is making that choice while his chaotic policies here at home continue driving costs for middle-class Americans to record highs.”

Advertisement

While noting “there is bipartisan support for stopping the development of nuclear weapons in Iran, there is no consensus for another interminable war in the Middle East.”

Durbin, who is not seeking reelection this year, pointed out he was one of 23 senators to vote against authorizing military force in Iraq in 2002. Trump attacked Iran without receiving any authorization from Congress — and before lawmakers could vote on a war powers resolution aimed at restricting military force without permission from the country’s legislative branch.

“A war in Iran with the goal of regime change could be another long-term military commitment with deadly consequences for thousands of American troops,” Durbin said. “The rash and unpredictable conduct of President Trump is a well-established worry in many ways but an impulsive commander in chief is a deadly combination.”

U.S. Rep. Wesley Bell, D-St. Louis County, speaks during a town hall meeting at The Post Building on Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2025, in downtown St. Louis.

Brian Munoz

/

Advertisement

St. Louis Public Radio

U.S. Rep. Wesley Bell, D-St. Louis County, speaks during a town hall meeting at The Post Building on Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2025, in downtown St. Louis.

Democratic Reps. Wesley Bell and Nikki Budzinski both released statements criticizing Trump’s decision to strike Iran. Budzinski, an Illinois Democrat, said “the Constitution is clear: only Congress has the power to send our nation to war.”

“This is a grave responsibility — one we take with the utmost seriousness. But the same cannot be said for President Trump,” said Budzinski, who added she would support a War Powers resolution. “Once again, he has disregarded the principle of coequal branches of government. And now, the consequences could be profound and dangerous.”

Bell said in his statement that “no one should mistake opposition to this war for sympathy toward that government.” But the Missouri Democrat added “launching a regime change campaign without a clear strategy, a defined end goal, or honest preparation for the costs is dangerous and shortsighted”.

“Military force is the most serious power our country can exercise,” Bell said. “It requires clarity of purpose, clearly defined objectives, and a credible plan for what comes next. War is not something you enter lightly, and it is not something you get to redo if it goes wrong. The American people and their Representatives deserve to know that every diplomatic option was fully exhausted before we put our troops in harm’s way.”

Advertisement

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, a potential presidential candidate in 2028, also blasted Trump’s decision for having “no justification, no authorization from Congress, and no clear objective.”

“But none of that matters to Donald Trump — and apparently neither do the safety and lives of American service members,” Pritzker said in a statement on BlueSky. “Donald Trump is once again sidestepping the Constitution and once again failing to explain why he’s taking us into another war. Americans asked for affordable housing and health care, not another potentially endless conflict. God protect our troops.”

Schmitt and Hawley mum for now

As of Saturday morning, Missouri Sens. Eric Schmitt and Josh Hawley had not released statements about Trump’s decision to attack Iran.

Both Missouri Republican senators were critical of Democratic President Joe Biden’s push to provide Ukraine with weapons to repel Russia’s invasion.

Advertisement

But they’ve been largely supportive of Trump’s foreign policy moves, even as some elements of the president’s political coalition have been fiercely critical of his interventionist decisions in Venezuela and Iran.

When asked about potential military action last week in Springfield, Hawley called Iran “a huge threat to the region, to our ally Israel — but also to our interests.”

“Iran absolutely cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon and needs to be put in their box and kept in their box,” Hawley said. “And we need our allies in the region, particularly Israel, to be strong, to keep them deterred, and contained long term.”

This story has been updated with additional comment.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Takeaways: Michigan basketball ends Illinois streak, wins Big Ten

Published

on

Takeaways: Michigan basketball ends Illinois streak, wins Big Ten


Michigan basketball entered Friday having lost nine straight games to Illinois. With the sole regular-season matchup coming in Champaign against the KenPom No. 4 Illini, it was going to be a tall task for the Wolverines to end that streak.

The game matched up the nation’s No. 2 defense against the No. 1 offense, and in front of a raucous Orange Krush, the maize and blue took a little while to get into an offensive rhythm. Because the No. 5 offense is no slouch, especially against the No. 31 defense. What’s more, Morez Johnson Jr. returned to Champaign after spending his first year with Illinois.

However, the Illini certainly showed how much Michigan appears to be their rival, and really played a physical brand of basketball. After Illinois got a five-point lead, the Wolverines bounced back and got a six-point lead. Illinois had a slight advantage in the first half on the boards, but the Wolverines had a field goal advantage. Both teams were relatively even on turnovers.

Advertisement

Ultimately, Michigan ended up taking a seven-point lead into the locker room at halftime, but backup point guard LJ Cason appeared to have hurt his knee on the final score of the half.

The second half started with a Michigan layup and an Illinois 3. The next round of scoring went exactly the same way. But then Yaxel Lendeborg hit a 3 to stop the asymmetry. They traded baskets, but then after a few Illinois turnovers, the Wolverines pushed the lead to 10.

Cason returned to the game after the under-16 media timeout, providing (temporary) good news for the maize and blue (he would leave the game again shortly). But the Wolverines missed a few shots, and Illinois took advantage, getting a shot from the field by Mirkovic before Wagler hit a 3 to cut the lead to five, prompting a Michigan timeout with 13:09 remaining.

Illinois cut Michigan’s lead back down to six, but Yaxel Lendeborg stretched it back to nine with a layup-and-one. Then Aday Mara started taking over.

Mara was unguardable, scoring floaters, dunks, and putbacks. His quick 7 points put the Wolverines up to a game-high of 14 with 9:13 remaining. The Illini answered to end the nearly three-minute field goal drought, ending Michigan’s 7-0 scoring run. But the Wolverine defense held, and Trey McKenney finally hit his first (of three) 3-point attempts to push the lead to 15, and he hit again on the next trip, pushing the lead to 18 with 7:34 left in the game. It was a 13-2 scoring run for the maize and blue.

Advertisement

After an Illinois timeout, they missed again, and Will Tschetter got in on the contagious, 3-pointer action, pushing the lead to 21. Cadeau finally broke the makes from deep, and Wagler hit to cut the lead back to 18 with 5:41 remaining.

Illinois couldn’t mount a comeback, and Michigan won, 84-70. Here are our five takeaways.

Homecoming for Morez Johnson Jr.

An Illinois native who spent his first year with the Illini, the Orange Krush did as much as it could to make it uncomfortable for the outgoing transfer. However, it wasn’t the case, as Johnson was often the best player on the floor.

He was the only Michigan basketball player in double digits at halftime, with 13 points, five rebounds, and a steal, and he was something of an energizer bunny out on the floor for the Wolverines. There were no qualms for Johnson returning to his old stomping ground, as he played one of his best games in a maize and blue uniform.

Johnson was quiet in the second half, but the damage was done, and it makes his former teammate’s pregame comments more prescient:

Advertisement

What could have been.

Johnson finished with a double-double, scoring 19 points and netting 11 rebounds.

Michigan’s offense outplays Illinois’ offense

As noted, the Illini entered the game with the No. 1 overall offense, while the Wolverines were No. 5. Yet, when the rubber hit the road, it was the maize and blue who had the superior offensive attack, managing to shoot 52.5% overall and 60% in the second half. Illinois managed 41.3% and 43.3% respectively.

The Michigan defense forced Illinois to go through a series of uncomfortable stretches in the second half, with multiple three-minute droughts from the floor. And Illinois, which is accustomed to getting to the foul line, couldn’t seem to draw many fouls until relatively late in the game. Even when the Illini forced three Wolverine turnovers late, they couldn’t seem to take advantage.

Ultimately, Michigan was dominant on both ends of the floor.

Advertisement

Bench, fastbreak, and points in the paint

The Wolverines dominated all three categories, finishing the game with 20 bench points, 10 fastbreak points, and 42 points in the paint. We already discussed Johnson and his homecoming, but we cannot leave out Aday Mara, who was just such a mismatch for Michigan vs. the Illini. As noted, Mara really flexed late in the game, taking it over. He was the catalyst for most of these stats.

Meanwhile, Illinois only had 7 bench points, 1 fastbreak point, and was just behind Michigan with 32 points in the paint.

The streak was emphatically broken

As we said in the open, the Illini had beaten the Wolverines nine straight times. Even the Fab Five couldn’t beat Illinois in Champaign, as the maize and blue have historically struggled at State Farm Arena. Though it took some time for the Wolverines to flex, flex they did, and this was as emphatic of a win as Michigan had all season.

The final score may have been just a 14-point gulf, but honestly, the game wasn’t really that close (and it hadn’t been for most of the final 10 minutes). This was a huge win for the Wolverines, one that’s been years in the making. If not decades.

With the win over Illinois, Michigan has won the outright Big Ten regular-season title.

Advertisement

No. 1 overall seed back in the realm of possibility

It may come down to the Big Ten Tournament now that Michigan has lost the head-to-head with Duke. And the Blue Devils’ 54-point win over Notre Dame pushed them into the No. 1 NET ranking, stealing it away from the maize and blue. But with a win over the No. 4 NET-ranked Illini, the Wolverines have the second-best win in college basketball (behind Duke, of course). They also have wins over No. 5 Gonzaga, No. 7 Purdue, No. 11 MSU, No. 12 Nebraska, and will face No. 26 Iowa on the road next week.

There’s a strong case for the maize and blue to have the No. 1 overall seed given the levels of domination over most all of the aforementioned teams.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending