Michigan
Short-term rental company sues Michigan over $18.7M tax bill
A nationwide short-term rental company is suing the state of Michigan over a tax audit that found the company owes about $18.7 million in unpaid use taxes to the state.
HomeAway, a Texas-based company best known for its vacation rental platform Vrbo, received a September bill for taxes due from the Michigan Department of Treasury for unpaid use taxes and interest in 2020, 2021 and 2022, totaling $18.7 million, according to the lawsuit filed in the Michigan Court of Claims.
HomeAway maintained in its Dec. 18 filing that it is the homeowners themselves who are responsible for collecting use taxes related to the short-term rental of their homes and remitting those taxes to the state.
“All funds representing use tax collected from guests were disbursed to the hosts,” the company said in its filing.
The state Department of Treasury and HomeAway declined to comment on pending litigation.
The tax fight comes amid a separate, but related, years-long fight in communities across the state and in the Legislature over how to best regulate and, in some cases, tax short-term rentals, which began to grow in popularity in Michigan after the 2008 housing crisis.
The Legislature has toyed with the idea of banning any local regulations over short-term rentals, putting some limits on those local regulations or establishing a statewide policy for short-term rental housing. State Rep. Mark Tisdel, R-Rochester Hills, helped introduce bills this fall that would allow communities to hold a vote on whether to tax short-term rentals locally to pay for essential services such as police or fire. The legislation has yet to receive a hearing.
In its suit filed Dec. 18 in the Michigan Court of Claims, HomeAway maintained that it was cognizant of the state’s 6% use tax and made provisions for its collection. But the ultimate remittance of that tax to the state is left to the homeowner.
When onboarding, according to the suit, a host or homeowner is given options regarding how they collect taxes. In Michigan, they could make it a percentage of the rental amount at booking or collect and remit the tax separately.
In either case, HomeAway argued, the host was responsible for paying the use tax. If the host made it a percentage of the rental amount due at booking, the taxes charged in the booking process were sent back to the host for remittance to the state. If the host indicated he or she would collect and remit on their own, the entire process was left to the host, according to the filing.
“The host acknowledged and represented that the host would handle tax collection from guests independent from HomeAway’s online checkout process,” HomeAway wrote in its filing. “…HomeAway never received or retained any tax amounts.”
In January 2023, the Department of Treasury began an audit of the prior three years, and in June 2025, the department issued a bill for taxes due for the audit period. The department found HomeAway wasn’t responsible for paying taxes if the host indicated he or she would collect and remit on their own. But the department maintained the company was responsible for remitting taxes where the host picked the option requiring the tax to be a percentage of the rental amount due at booking, the lawsuit said.
On Sept. 19, 2025, the Department of Treasury issued an $18.7 million bill, with about $15.1 million owed in use taxes and $3.6 million owed in interest. The bill included a total of $676,246 in use tax and interest for 2020, $8.6 million for 2021 and $9.5 million for 2022.
“The department — for the first time during the audit — alleged that for all bookings for which tax was collected on behalf of and at the request of the host, HomeAway unjustly enriched itself by failing to remit the collected taxes to the department,” the filing said.
The state treasury bills, attached to the lawsuit as exhibits, only note that the money due is for use tax and interest following an audit. There is no mention in the bills of which type of rentals HomeAway was responsible for when it came to remittance of the use tax.
HomeAway, in its lawsuit, denied that it was unjustly enriched, arguing the company didn’t keep any of the tax payments, but instead forwarded them to homeowners to remit to the state.
“It was the hosts — not HomeAway — that were responsible for remittance of use tax to the departments,” the filing said.
HomeAway also alleged the department’s audit violated the federal and state Equal Protection Clauses because it treated HomeAway differently from other similarly situated taxpayers.
“There is no precedent to support the department’s allegation, nor has the department applied this theory to similarly situated taxpayers,” the filing said.
eleblanc@detroitnews.com
Michigan
Bills to end concealed carry permit requirement introduced in Michigan House
LANSING, Mich. — A group of Republicans in the Michigan House say Michiganders’ second amendment rights are being infringed, as they introduce legislation to end requirements for concealed carry permits.
Right now, Michiganders must obtain a permit to carry a concealed gun, with a base fee of $100.
As part of the process, applicants must also receive training.
“The first thing they do is put you in a classroom, make sure you know all proper range and safety procedures, run you over what the law states about when and if you’re allowed to use your firearm,” Jonathan Hold, president of the Michigan chapter of Giffords Gun Owners for Safety and a firearms instructor, said. “It gives a really good grounding.”
Applicants must demonstrate four hours of range time as well.
The group of House Republicans feel this is an undue burden, noting many gun owners are already knowledgeable.
They also believe the current five-year felony for carrying without a permit is too steep.
“For the government of the state of Michigan to tell that that we have to be qualified under the guise of their rules in order to protect ourselves is a far cry from what the constitution provides for us,” Rep. Jay DeBoyer, (R- Clay) said.
The package of bills wouldn’t abolish permits, as they are necessary to take guns outside of the state, but it would institute what’s called “constitutional carry.”
That means Michiganders can carry a gun on them without a permit.
Twenty-nine other states already adopted such policies.
“When we exercise other first amendment rights like our right to speak, we do not have to get a permit or permission from the government to speak,” Rep. Jim DeSana (R- Carleton) said. “When we exercise our right to worship, we do not have to go get a permit or permission to go worship.”
Supporters say concealed guns are important for self-defense, and can also help stop crime.
“It’s going to encourage and increase safety for all,” Rep. Joseph Fox (R- Fremont) said. “It’s about protecting everybody because if there are guns in this situation, and people are worried for their lives, they’re gonna stay back away from evil and making bad choices.”
Gun control advocates like Gold, however, say it’s “ridiculous” not to have guardrails.
“We’re talking about the power of life and death at a distance,” Gold said. “To send an untrained user out into the world with a firearm is a mistake.”
He also takes issue with the constitution argument.
“The constitution says as part of a well regulated militia, if you read the second amendment, and we don’t have well regulated militias in this country,” Gold said. “At the very least, what we should have are trained firearms users.”
A similar effort to end concealed carry permits failed to gain traction last year in the Michigan Senate, and with the landscape unchanged, the bills likely have an uphill battle to become law.
Michigan
Werewolf, trout ruled in ’24. What will be next ‘I voted’ sticker
How to register to vote in Michigan: Step-by-step guide
Registering to vote in Michigan is simple and can be done online, by mail, or in person, depending on how close you are to Election Day.
The rewarding feeling of wearing an “I Voted” sticker after turning in your ballot is something everyone can relate to.
Michigan voters can take it one step farther and vote on the design for the Election Day tradition.
The Michigan Department of State announced on March 3 the return of the highly competitive “I Voted” sticker contest in preparation for the state’s general election on Tuesday, Nov. 3.
“Our first-ever ‘I Voted’ sticker design contest in 2024 was a massive success,” Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said in a March 3 release. “This year we look forward to seeing the creative ways Michiganders of all ages celebrate democracy. Submit your entry to help us continue the tradition and get voters excited to cast their ballot this fall.”
Designs are being accepted online via the Secretary of State’s “I Voted” webpage: Michigan.gov/IVotedSticker. On the page, participants may print or download the official entry form.
Design and entry rules, the sticker template, and tips and suggestions are included on the official entry form.
There are three categories — elementary/middle school (grades K-8), high school (grades 9-12) and Michigan residents of all ages. Designs are due at 5 p.m. on Friday, May 1.
Once submissions are closed, the public may vote for finalists online in June. Winners will be announced and celebrated later in the summer. Winning stickers will be dispersed to local election clerks for the November Election.
In 2024, there were more than 480 submissions, and more than 57,700 voters selected the nine winners, according to the release. Before the contest opened up for a public vote, the Michigan Collegiate Student Advisory Task Force members narrowed the submissions down to 25 semifinalists.
Here’s the 2024 winners and rules for the 2026 participants:
What did the winning 2024 ‘I Voted’ sticker designs look like?
Want to enter a design? Here are the ‘I Voted’ sticker contest rules
According to the Secretary of State, here’s what to keep in mind for your sticker:
- Designs must be completed using official entry form.
- Designs must include the phrase “I voted” AND be nonpartisan in nature.
- Artwork must be original, non-AI generated, and not contain copyrighted or trademarked designs.
- Entries can be created using your preferred method (digital, paint, crayon, mixed media, etc.)
- Provide as high quality of resolution as possible when submitting your design.
- There are three categories — elementary/middle school (grades K-8), high school (grades 9-12) and Michigan residents of all ages. You may enter one design in one category.
- Designs are due at 5 p.m. on Friday, May 1.
Contact Sarah Moore @ smoore@lsj.com
Michigan
2 Smoothie King employees fired for refusing to serve customer in Trump hoodie
Two employees who refused to serve a man and his wife because he was wearing a hoodie with President Trump’s name on it were fired after a video of the heated encounter went viral.
Erika Lindemyer and her husband, Jake, were forced out of a Smoothie King franchise location in Ann Arbor, Michigan, following a fiery clash with two young female workers on Sunday.
The employees claimed they didn’t “feel comfortable” serving the couple because of Jake’s pro-Trump hoodie, as captured by Erika in a viral video.
Jake and Erika fired back at the pair and insisted that they were being “discriminated” against based on their “political views.”
“We were just wanting a smoothie and you literally looked at us and I asked you if everything was OK and you said ‘We don’t feel comfortable serving you’ because of my husband’s hoodie. That is discrimination,” Erika spat.
“Okay, well, have a great day,” the first employee said.
“That is illegal,” Erika tried to insist again.
“I said Trump discriminates [against] us,” another employee chimed in.
“Okay, well that has nothing to do with us getting a smoothie!” Erika guffawed.
“OK, well that’s who you support though, that’s who you love,” the first employee chided.
“What’s embarrassing is that we’re American citizens and I wanted to get a smoothie,” Erika huffed.
The second employee noted that they “have a right to refuse service” and directed the couple to the exit.
“You asked a question and [the other employee] gave you an answer. Have a great day. Have a great day. The door’s right there,” the second worker said.
Trump merchandise. Leftism/X
Erika threatened to call the police while storming out, but it’s unclear if she did.
In a separate video shared Monday, one of the workers joked that she might’ve “accidentally started a race war” and called on the public to help remove Erika’s video.
“I am a minor and she recorded me without my permission. The people in the comments are all white and they’re all being hella racist, guys, please help me get this video taken down,” she implored.
Smoothie King confirmed that the girls involved in the viral confrontation “are no longer with the business” as of Monday.
“As a brand, Smoothie King is committed to ensuring our stores are a place free of discrimination of any kind, where every guest and team member is treated with care and respect,” the company wrote on X.
The owner of the Ann Arbor franchise location will also enforce “mandatory retraining for all employees that outlines our guest experience standards.”
In early December, a woman who worked at a Target in California was berated by a customer for wearing a Charlie Kirk “Freedom” T-shirt.
When the employee insisted she was allowed to wear the red shirt, the irate customer accused her of supporting “a racist.”
The medical center where the agitated customer worked was bombarded with upwards of 6,000 “profanity-laced” phone calls after online sleuths doxxed her personal information.
-
World6 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts7 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO6 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oregon5 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Florida3 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Maryland3 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies