Connect with us

Denver, CO

Resignations and rainbow removals: What DU’s move to end DEI looks like on campus

Published

on

Resignations and rainbow removals: What DU’s move to end DEI looks like on campus


The Pride Lounge at the University of Denver was a colorful conference room adorned with rainbows, LGBTQ-affirming posters and bookshelves crammed with queer literature.

Students of all backgrounds and beliefs could gather there to chat, study and build community, but the space was particularly affirming and welcoming for the campus’s LGBTQ students — a place they could be their authentic selves.

Eric Duran, former director of the Gender and Sexuality Student Success wing of the private university’s Cultural Center, said he broke down when DU leadership issued a directive last month to scrub the university of resources for LGBTQ people.

Duran and his co-director at the since-renamed Cultural Center resigned this month. Duran said he couldn’t bring himself to dismantle the Pride Lounge, so a colleague removed all LGBTQ-related items from the room — one of the most plainly visible examples of DU’s move this fall to end diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives on campus, drawing anger from some faculty, employees and students.

Advertisement

“It felt like I was being told to put students back in the closet or to not be visible at the university anymore,” Duran said. “I really did break down. It was a very hard day.”

The resignations occurred weeks after Chancellor Jeremy Haefner announced DU was doing away with many of the services and programs that support students of color and other marginalized scholars out of fear the school would lose federal funding from the Trump administration, which has labeled diversity initiatives as unlawfully discriminatory.

Since returning to office in January, President Donald Trump and his administration have railed against DEI efforts and pulled federal funding from institutions with programs supporting people of color, LGBTQ students and low-income residents who often face extra barriers to college.

Haefner declined an interview for this story, but provided an emailed statement saying DU remained “steadfastly committed” to inclusiveness. He noted that this year’s class of first-year students had the highest percentage of students of color in DU history at 34%.

“I understand change can be hard, especially when individuals feel as though the representation of particular identities may be at stake, and even more so when someone does not agree with why the change is occurring and has invested so much time in advocating for something so critical,” Haefner wrote. “But I continue to be inspired by our staff and faculty who lean into this effort and are focused on making sure that we continue to provide support and resources for all faculty, staff, and students at DU.”

Advertisement

People who work and learn at the Denver liberal arts college describe “a culture of fear” created by a “university bending to an authoritarian government,” Duran wrote in an email to colleagues upon his resignation.

Haefner told The Denver Post last month that DU was not “kowtowing” to the federal administration and that inclusivity would remain an institutional core value. But as programs and spaces benefitting the university’s most vulnerable students are moved, renamed or dissolved, DU’s marginalized community members say they wonder whether their diversity — once touted by the university as a positive — will be drowned out entirely.

Anxious students

Dheepa Sundaram, DU associate professor of Hindu studies and digital culture, called the current higher education landscape a “crisis situation.” She said she understands there is no easy solution and that the risk of seeing funding cut off is real.

Academic institutions across the country have lost hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds this year as the Trump administration pulls grants deemed DEI-related.

“But I also think we should fight,” Sundaram said. “We have a risk-averse administration that is also not great at communicating, and that’s made this situation difficult. There’s a lot of confusion around why we won’t fight back. The administration is telling us, ‘Don’t worry. We’re erasing you, but we’re still here.’ That feels really tone deaf.”

Advertisement

Haefner noted in his statement that since 2023, all universities have been impacted by the Supreme Court ruling on the consideration of race in admissions, including through the “changes in interpretation of the law” that Trump’s Justice Department issued equating DEI with discrimination.

“We remain steadfastly committed to our values, including our commitment to inclusiveness and our collective work to make sure all students can feel welcomed and supported,” Haefner wrote. “We also are committed to comply with the law, and we are confident that we can achieve both goals.”

Sundaram recently met with her students of color to hear their thoughts on the changes at their school this year.

The image on the left shows the website of the University of Denver’s former Cultural Center, which has been rebranded as Community Connections, shown on the right. (Screen captures via web.archive.org and du.edu)

Not only was the Pride Lounge dismantled, but a lounge for students of color was dissolved, too, Sundaram said. The Cultural Center — formerly a space inside the Community Commons building — was relocated to a smaller space on a different floor and renamed Community Connections.

DEI training for faculty and staff was also eliminated.

Advertisement

Students who give campus tours to incoming freshmen told Sundaram they’ve been instructed to remove references to resources for students of color and LGBTQ students, she said. Her students told her they feel like they have to censor themselves on campus. On a positive note for Sundaram, the professor said the curriculum appears to be untouched.

“I don’t think students know where to go for support,” Sundaram said. “Students feel like they have lost all the different things that made the campus feel special and connected. I don’t think the administration recognizes they are destroying that community aspect they keep emphasizing because students just don’t feel like they have their back. I don’t think I’ve ever seen the students so anxious.”

Haefner said the university created a new Division of Community Support and Engagement in the wake of the DEI rollbacks to further “new means of engagement to lead in building connections for an inclusive environment for the entirety of the DU community.”

Ember Zabe, a 33-year-old student working on a master’s of social work degree, was a queer mentor in a program through the Cultural Center in which they supported undergraduate LGBTQ students. The program was disbanded this fall.

DU also eliminated scholarships, internships, mentorships or leadership programs for specific racial groups or that target underserved geographic areas.

Advertisement

“My heart is very heavy knowing there are young people entering DU in search of connection and opportunity that no longer exists for them,” Zabe said. “It’s not acceptable that the university boasts about their diverse student body, tokenizing students who have marginalized identities while simultaneously stripping the student body of nearly all supports and resources that support LGBTQ, first-generation and BIPOC (Black, Indigenous and people of color) students.”

Evelyn Stovin, 23, used to be a student employee at the Cultural Center and served as the former president of DU’s Queer Student Alliance.

The Cultural Center once housed the Pride Closet, which offered free, gender-affirming products like chest binders or clothing that students experimenting with their gender identity could wear. The Pride Closet was moved and renamed the Care Closet. Its purpose will be broadened, Stovin said.

“I’m frustrated that we are supposed to be a liberal university in Colorado of all places and we are run by the most despicable people imaginable who don’t have the balls to try and stand up for their students,” Stovin said.

‘DEI is not dead’

The final straw for Duran came when senior administrators said his job title and job description must change to remove any association with diverse groups, he said.

Advertisement

“That was really when I was like, ‘This isn’t my job anymore to serve LGBTQ students the way I did,’” Duran said.

When Duran resigned Oct. 9, he sent a long email to his colleagues, which has since been widely distributed and referenced in public faculty meetings, Sundaram said. The email, Duran said, was a reflection of what it felt like to be marginalized by the institution.



Source link

Advertisement

Denver, CO

University of Denver to close Ricks Center for Gifted Children next year

Published

on

University of Denver to close Ricks Center for Gifted Children next year


The University of Denver will close the Ricks Center for Gifted Children next year as enrollment has fallen in recent years, the college announced this week.

The Ricks Center, which serves gifted children as young as 3 years old, will operate for the 2026-27 academic year before closing, according to a letter DU sent parents on Wednesday.

“The University of Denver has made the difficult decision to close the Ricks Center for Gifted Children at the conclusion of the 2026–2027 academic year,” spokesman Jon Stone said in a statement. “This decision reflects long-term operational and financial considerations and is not a reflection of the school’s quality, leadership, or community.”

The center, which is located on DU’s campus, was started in 1984 as the University Center for Gifted Young Children. The program offers classes to students in preschool through eighth grade, according to the website.

Advertisement

The program, along with other public K-12 schools in the state, has experienced declining enrollment in recent years. The center enrolled 142 students for the 2025-26 academic year, which is down from 200 pupils four years ago.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Denver, CO

David Fountaine Black Obituary | The Denver Post

Published

on

David Fountaine Black Obituary |  The Denver Post



David Fountaine Black


OBITUARY

Dave and Martha and their three boys moved to Denver in 1974 when Dave started work at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal. He and a business partner later purchased Mid-America Plating Company. Dave operated Mid-America for 36 years and finally retired in 2018.

He was a great golfer and natural athlete. Dave was an avid runner, and for many years, he woke up before the sun to get his miles in before work. He and Martha loved playing bridge with friends, gardening – growing fruit and flowers – and spending time outside relaxing and walking on the High Line Canal Trail and in Bible Park. Dave and Martha enjoyed getting back to Arizona during the winter at their Tucson home. They loved spending time with their family.

Advertisement

Dave passed away on February 20, 2026. He is loved by family and friends and will be missed. Dave was a hard-working, kind, optimistic, and thoughtful person who leaves the world a better place. He is survived by his wife, Martha, and his three sons, Dave (Robin), Tom (Debbie), Eric (Kendra), as well as six grandchildren and three great grandchildren, Casey (Nicole), Jake (Ashleigh and great granddaughter Faye), Hailey (Robby and great granddaughter Jensen), Keenan (Nicole and great granddaughter Olivia), Griffin, and Addie (Erik).



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

10 takeaways from the Celtics looking a step behind in Denver

Published

on

10 takeaways from the Celtics looking a step behind in Denver


Sometimes in life, you feel like you’re a step behind. Nothing big, but yet, it creates a difference between where you should be and where you are, and this small difference has consequences. Well, that’s how it felt looking at the Celtics’ off-ball defense last night.

This first bucket from the Nuggets is a great example of the Nuggets being a step ahead. The screen from Cam Johnson causes a bit of chaos as Derrick White and Jaylen Brown don’t switch, leaving a lot of space for Jamal Murray to cut to the rim. A few possessions later, it’s Brown again who is half a second late when Johnson starts moving, and that’s enough for the Nuggets to punish the Celtics.

Denver is a very smart, very well coached team. It isn’t a surprise they involved Jordan Walsh’s matchup in the screen because the young wing has a tendency to overpressure off-ball. Therefore, with all the screens and movement the Nuggets are creating, it is hard for him to keep up.

This game was a great example of what makes a team like Denver so good. They can find a breach in a great defense by targeting players’ tendencies. Like the Celtics, they scout, they learn, and they adapt their approach to the opponent, and it worked out pretty well, even in garbage time.

Advertisement

#2 – The offense broke under pressure

On offense, the Celtics lost the ball on more than 15% of their possessions. When this happens, the Celtics have a 50% win rate. Taking care of the ball is one of the foundations of that team, and they couldn’t deliver last night. Led by Bruce Brown and Spencer Jones, the Nuggets put a lot of pressure on the Celtics’ ball-handlers.

They also didn’t hesitate to bring a second defender to force a quicker decision and generated some mistakes from Boston. With that appetite for steals and the domination on the offensive glass, the Denver Nuggets were able to generate 10 more field-goal attempts than the Celtics. And when the Celtics lose the possession battle, it becomes a lot harder to compete against the best teams in the league.

It was a different sight than usual on defense for the Denver Nuggets. We are used to seeing Jokic hedging on the pick-and-roll to force a pass and put pressure on the ball-handler, but this wasn’t the case last night. The guards put a lot of pressure while the Serbian was commanding from the back.

It was an interesting way to take away the paint from the Celtics while showing bodies beyond the three-point line. While Jokic was in the paint behind the pick-and-roll, the Nuggets’ closest defender next to the screen would come to disrupt the action.

Advertisement

Thanks to that, Jokic had less effort to expend on defense and could compensate on offense. In some possessions, Jokic would come up to surprise the ball-handler and create some chaos, like here:

But overall, the 3-time MVP remained in a drop position, and this explains why the Celtics had so much trouble getting to the paint last night.

#4 – Denver daring Ron Harper Junior to shoot

The young wing is discovering the NBA and what it is like to be scouted by the best teams in the world. After a standout performance against the Suns, he was back on the bench to start the game. Yet, like every other player on the roster, the Nuggets scouted him and had a plan in mind for when he would come onto the court.

As the defensive plan was to protect the paint at all costs, they decided to leave him alone beyond the line to make sure the Celtics touched the paint as little as possible.

Advertisement

The Celtics tried to get him involved in the screening action, hoping he would draw some attention from the defense, but the Nuggets couldn’t care less about his shooting threat.

In the end, that approach worked out pretty well for Denver as Harper shot one for seven from deep in 10 minutes. This also took away part of his offensive impact, and the Celtics had to adapt their rotation.

Because the Nuggets were willing to leave non-shooters open, the Celtics tried their double-big lineup again. If the opponent isn’t going to respect your shooters, you might as well play big. And the idea makes sense.

Because the Celtics played with two bigs and the non-shooter of the two is Neemias Queta, Vucevic was matched up with a smaller player. Therefore, it was easier for him to get a mismatch in the post. However, it was also easier for Jokic to come help from behind because of Queta’s presence in the paint.

To make this work on offense, I think the Celtics need to work on high-low offense with more movement from the off-ball players around the two centers. Defensively, it brought more rebounding stability and rim protection. The Celtics could target non-shooting threats like Christian Braun so the paint remained stacked.

Advertisement

If the Celtics can build some offensive synergy between Queta and Vucevic, things could be really fun and bring a great balance against big teams like Denver.

Because Denver was so aggressive when it came to protecting the paint, the Celtics decided to start their actions from the half-court line to stretch the Denver defense.

Here, a zoom action for Derrick White starts from half court, with Sam Hauser screening at the logo and Queta handing off at the three-point line. Because of that space and the distance of the screen, Jones has more difficulty containing White. This created a little bit of chaos in the defense and worked pretty well.

Yet, starting from deep isn’t enough, and using screens correctly remains one of the most important parts of off-ball actions. Here, look how easy it is for the Denver Nuggets defenders to stay connected to their matchup despite the various screens.

The idea was great, the execution not so much. Yet, it gives some perspective on how the Celtics offense can adapt when the spacing is missing.

Advertisement

#7 – More volume for White?

Looking at the stats from cleaningtheglass.com, I’m left with a couple of questions.

First, why didn’t White have more opportunities with the shot? He was really efficient with 1.25 points per shot attempt, created chaos with his speed and passing, and yet his usage was pretty average.

In the meantime, Jaylen Brown’s usage was once again close to 40% despite really low efficiency. When the defense shrinks the space like last night, I would like to see more possessions for White to unlock Jaylen Brown off-ball.

Against such a smart defense, isolation and drives in a crowded paint won’t work as much as usual, and the Celtics need to readjust how JB plays against elite teams to make sure to maximize him next to a great connector like Derrick White. The former Colorado guard scored 18 points in the second quarter but couldn’t get anything going after that.

#8 – More minutes for Hauser?

Advertisement

A second question I would have asked is why Sam Hauser didn’t get more minutes. As we saw earlier, the Nuggets were willing to leave a shooter open to protect the paint – even if that shooter was Sam Hauser.

So, when Sam was the guy next to the ball on the pick-and-roll, it created great things for the Celtics because the help defender couldn’t fully commit. And if he did, the Celtics could swing the ball to the wing.

Even if he didn’t make all the shots, the added value in spacing was so crucial that it was vital for the Celtics to keep him on the court to have the best chance on offense.

#9 – Be patient with Vucevic

It took seven games for someone to raise the question – let’s be patient. And also let’s take a step back and remember that Vucevic isn’t the Celtics’ savior. He never has been an efficient scorer, never been a great interior defender. But he is a smart player with great passing for a 7-footer.

Advertisement

If you are expecting Nikola Vucevic to reach Kristaps Porzingis’ numbers in rim protection and scoring efficiency, well, be prepared to wait for a while because it never was the case. However, Vucevic can bring a push in the possession battle while providing spacing and great secondary passing once he gets more comfortable in the Celtics offense.

Let’s be nice, let’s be patient, this roster isn’t changing anytime soon.

#10 – Out of gas, out of air

Three games in four days, the last one 5280 feet above sea level, and the Celtics were out of gas and out of air.

This month, they played six games on the road, a lot of time away from home. March should be far more comfortable with nine games at TD Garden.

Advertisement

Might be the perfect timing for Jayson Tatum to come back (and for me to book a ticket from France to cover some games from the ground).”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending