Connect with us

Massachusetts

Massachusetts confronts toxic ‘forever chemicals’

Published

on

Massachusetts confronts toxic ‘forever chemicals’


Massachusetts is not “in the vanguard” when it comes to addressing toxic “forever chemicals,” according to the Senate sponsor of a bill meant to help municipalities and water systems clean up related contamination.

It’s the second time House Speaker Pro Tempore Kate Hogan and Senate Assistant Majority Whip Julian Cyr have filed legislation that would phase out the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a class of chemicals that do not break down fully in the environment and are linked to harmful health issues like thyroid disease, liver damage, some cancers and immune system suppression.

The bills gained favorable reports last session from the Joint Committee on Public Health and Health Care Financing, but died in House Ways and Means Committee last session.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data show that more than 99% of people in the U.S. have detectable levels of PFAS in their blood, according to Laurel Schaider, a senior scientist at Newton-based Silent Spring Institute who spoke at a State House briefing on Thursday.

Advertisement

PFAS are often used in nonstick, stain-resistant, waterproof and grease-resistant products. Well owners and users, farmers and firefighters from across Massachusetts have testified before the Legislature in recent years and gathered at the State House Thursday to discuss the illnesses and other issues that have resulted from water and soil contaminated with PFAS and firefighting gear designed with PFAS in it.

“I think there’s two hurdles here. One is that we’re talking about complex policy related to environmental science, and the more that we learn about PFAS, the more we understand its ubiquity,” Cyr told the News Service. “As you build a statutory and then a regulatory scheme around it, this isn’t easy policymaking.”

A group of common items with and without per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in them, displayed at the State House briefing.

The Legislature in 2024 passed a few measures, according to Hogan, including those phasing out PFAS in firefighter protective gear and increasing funds to MassDEP to provide support for PFAS testing.

Other lawmakers have filed varying forms of legislation this session aiming to address different PFAS-related issues. A delegation of Massachusetts lawmakers visited Maine in August in an attempt to better understand how the state tackled contamination caused by PFAS specifically related to sewage sludge on farms.

Advertisement

“Massachusetts, we like to be in the vanguard of public health, of environmental health and safety. We are no longer in the vanguard. I think there are 13 or 14 other states that have passed some form of legislation related to PFAS. So we’re losing ground a bit,” Cyr said.

Alaska, New Jersey and New Hampshire also recently passed laws specifically addressing PFAS used in firefighting equipment. States including California, Colorado, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont have passed varying laws phasing out the use of PFAS.



Source link

Advertisement

Massachusetts

National Grid asking for a rate increase in Massachusetts: How much would my bill go up

Published

on

National Grid asking for a rate increase in Massachusetts: How much would my bill go up


Massachusetts residents’ gas bills could increase by nearly 10% if a petition from the National Grid is approved.

On Jan. 16, the National Grid filed a petition to increase its gas distribution rates so that it can generate $342 million in additional revenues. 

The request comes as affordability is a major issue in the state, with energy prices being one of the main drivers: in November, 21% of Massachusetts voters said that utilities were the single biggest strain on their household budget in a Suffolk University/Boston Globe poll. At the State of the Commonwealth in January, Gov. Maura Healey announced that the state would temporarily lower electricity and gas bills in February and March.

But if the National Grid’s request is approved by the state Department of Public Utilities, customers will see monthly bill increases in December.

Advertisement

How much could my utility bill go up?

According to the National Grid and the Department of Public Utilities, a typical residential heating customer of the Boston Gas Company – which services greater Boston and central Massachusetts – will see their monthly bill increase by $23.66, or 8.4%, during the winter season. 

A typical customer of the Colonial Gas Company – which services some communities on the Cape and in Merrimack Valley – will see their monthly bill increase $24.76, or 9.4%.

Slightly different rate increases will apply to low-income heating and non-heating customers and typical non-heating customers, as well as commercial and industrial customers.

Why does the National Grid want to raise prices?

The DPU said that utilities can file petitions to “recover reasonable and prudent costs that have been incurred to provide safe and reliable service to its customers and have the opportunity to earn a fair and reasonable rate of return on prudently invested capital.”

Advertisement

The National Grid is hoping to use the increase in revenue to pay costs including for new gas pipes, to recover charges from billing errors last year and to address gas safety regulations and compliance.

When would my utility bill go up?

According to DPU, if the petition is approved, customers can expect rate increases effective Dec. 1, 2026.

Do I have a say?

If you want to comment on the petition, you can submit emailed written comments to dpu.efiling@mass.gov, DPU2650.GridRateCase@mass.gov and rhumm@keeganwerlin.com by 5 p.m. on April 30, 2026.

There will also be seven public hearings:

  • March 18 in Lowell
  • March 23 in North Quincy
  • March 26 in South Yarmouth
  • March 31 in Haverhill
  • April 6 in Lynn
  • April 9 in Acton
  • April 15 in Boston



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Mass. weather: Warm-up coming over the next week

Published

on

Mass. weather: Warm-up coming over the next week


Spring may not have come yet, but Massachusetts is set to experience a warm-up over the next week that could melt some of the lingering snow.

From Friday through Monday, mostly sunny skies and highs in the mid 30s to low 40s are predicted across the state, according to the National Weather Service. Temperatures are expected to warm even further from Tuesday through Thursday next week, with daily highs reaching the upper 30s to mid 40s.

Massachusetts is expected to experience a warm-up over the next week, according to the National Weather Service.National Weather Service

Overnight low temperatures are predicted to drop into the low 20s on the Cape and Islands and into the teens across the rest of the state Thursday night, according to the weather service. Lows in the mid teens to mid 20s are expected throughout Massachusetts Friday and Saturday night.

A few passing flurries or brief snow showers are possible late Friday night into early Saturday, but they will be “moisture-starved,” meaning that they should not have much impact or leave more than a dusting, according to the weather service.

Advertisement

Forecasters have been monitoring a winter storm that looked like it might reach Massachusetts Sunday night, but weather models now indicate its track will be too far offshore to impact Southern New England, the weather service said.

Overnight low temperatures are also predicted to be warmer next week, according to the weather service. After Sunday night, when temperatures are expected to drop into the 20s, overnight lows are predicted to dip only as low as the upper 20s and low 30s through Wednesday night.



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Battenfeld: Massachusetts Dems join Pelosi school of get-rich-quick schemes

Published

on

Battenfeld: Massachusetts Dems join Pelosi school of get-rich-quick schemes


A growing number of Democratic lawmakers – including several in Massachusetts – are following the Nancy Pelosi school of get-rich-quick schemes, a sure-fire way of seeing your family wealth skyrocket while serving in Congress.

Ayanna Pressley, Elizabeth Warren, Katherine Clark, Ilhan Omar have all become richer – some astonishingly so – after stepping in the cash-lined halls of the Capitol, whether it’s from their husband’s businesses, their stock portfolios or their book deals.

Far left “Squad” member Pressley’s rise from nearly zero to up to $8 million in net worth, fattened by her and her husband’s four rental properties in Mattapan, Boston, Fort Lauderdale and Martha’s Vineyard, is drawing increasing scrutiny, as she bristles at questions about her newly-acquired wealth. Pressley and hubby Conan Harris sold the half-million-dollar Florida pad for a $67,000 profit in 2024.

“I wish you people would stop reporting fake news,” a heated Pressley, surrounded by a team of security in black SUVs, said in Washington when confronted by a reporter recently. “You don’t know anything about me and my life. I was raised in a single-parent home. Every single thing my family and I have we have earned. And you are reporting fake news. Do your homework.”

Advertisement

Pressley, who makes $174,000 a year and like Warren has railed against tax breaks for the wealthy, also told Fox News “there’s nothing to see here” about her financial rise.

“Sir, I submit a financial disclosure, just like everybody else,” she said.

Squad member Omar and her husband, Tim Mynett, who owns several businesses, had almost nothing when she was first elected, but her net worth reportedly exploded in just a few years to $25 million.

The Republican-led House Oversight Committee is now investigating Omar’s mysterious rise to wealth, which comes amid a federal social services fraud probe in her home district in Minnesota.

“We’re going to get answers, whether it’s through the Ethics Committee or the Oversight Committee, one of the two, “ Oversight chair James Comer (R-Ky.) told the New York Post. “There are a lot of questions as to how her husband accumulated so much wealth over the past two years. It’s not possible. It’s not. I’m a money guy, it’s not possible.”

Advertisement

Warren’s net worth has risen to a reported $10 million from book deals and her Senate salary. Known for her rants against billionaires and standing up for the little guy, she holds mutual funds worth an estimated $1.76 million. The Cambridge Democrat and her husband, Bruce Mann, reported earning more than $912,000 in 2024, according to their tax forms.

Clark and her husband, Rodney Dowell, are worth more than $14 million, making a cool $458,000 in the stock market last year before stopping trading, according to reports.

She was estimated to be worth $6.8 million in 2018, before her rise to Democratic House Whip, which is second in command to the House Minority Leader.

The STOCK Act, signed into law by Barack Obama in April 2012, prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them because of their positions for personal gain, such as stock trades.

Former House Speaker Pelosi, 85, and her husband Paul have an estimated net worth of more than $278 million, making her one of the richest members of Congress. Her investment moves in the stock market while serving in Congress have added millions to her net worth.

Advertisement

While it appears that most of the lawmakers have not broken laws, their spectacular rise in wealth and refusal to answer questions about it raises questions about accountability and hypocrisy.

They should be forced to stand before the press and explain exactly how they made such money while serving in the public sector. And have they had any influence over their husband’s financial successes?

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (AP Photo/Karl B DeBlaker, File)
Rep. Katherine Clark, D-Mass. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, File)
Rep. Katherine Clark, D-Mass. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, File)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending