Connect with us

Austin, TX

2025 NCAA baseball bracket: Men's College World Series scores, schedule

Published

on

2025 NCAA baseball bracket: Men's College World Series scores, schedule


The 2025 NCAA Division I baseball tournament is here. It began with a 64-team field competing in regionals, then moved to 16 teams at super regionals before an eight-team field in the Men’s College World Series in Omaha, Nebraska, from June 13 to June 22/23. 

The MCWS will feature two double-elimination brackets with the two winners meeting in a best-of-three championship series. The 64-team tournament bracket was announced on Monday, May 26.

⚾️ MORE BASEBALL ⚾️

Below, you can find all the information about the 2025 NCAA DI men’s tournament — regional, super regional and Men’s College World Series. 

Advertisement

2025 NCAA DI baseball tournament bracket

Here is the bracket for the Men’s College World Series

➡️ Interactive bracket | Regional brackets

2025 NCAA DI baseball tournament schedule  

All times ET.

  • MCWS games: Starts Friday, June 13  (all times ET)
    • Saturday, June 14
    • Sunday, June 15

    • Monday, June 16

    • Tuesday, June 17

    • Wednesday, June 18
  • MCWS finals: Saturday – Sunday/Monday, June 21-22/23

  • Selection show: Monday, May 26 at Noon ET
  • Regionals: Friday-Monday, May 30-June 2
    • Nashville Regional, Nashville, Tennessee
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Hattiesburg Regional, Hattiesburg, Mississippi
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Tallahassee Regional, Tallahassee, Florida
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Corvallis Regional, Corvallis, Oregon
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Chapel Hill Regional, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Eugene Regional, Eugene Oregon
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Conway Regional, Conway, South Carolina
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Auburn Regional, Auburn, Alabama
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Austin Regional, Austin, Texas
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Los Angeles Regional, Los Angeles, California
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Oxford Regional, Oxford, Mississippi
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Athens Regional, Athens, Georgia
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Baton Rouge Regional, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Clemson Regional, Clemson, South Carolina
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Knoxville Regional, Knoxville, Tennessee
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Fayetteville Regional, Fayetteville, Arkansas
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
  • Super Regionals: Friday-Monday, June 6-9
    • Auburn Super Regional, Auburn, Alabama
      • Friday, June 6
      • Saturday, June 7
    • Baton Rouge Super Regional, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
    • Chapel Hill Super Regional, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
      • Friday, June 6
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
    • Corvallis Super Regional, Corvallis, Oregon
      • Friday, June 6
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
    • Durham Super Regional. Durham, North Carolina
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
      • Monday, June 9
    • Fayetteville Super Regional, Fayetteville, Arkansas
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
    • Los Angeles Super Regional, Los Angeles, California
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
    • Louisville Super Regional, Louisville, Kentucky
      • Friday, June 6
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8

How to get tickets for the Men’s College World Series

The Men’s College World Series will be played at Charles Schwab Field Omaha in Omaha, NE. You can find all the ticket info for the 2025 MCWS here.

Baseball Championship: Future dates

Year REGIONALS SUPER REGIONALS MCWS
2026 May 29 – June 1 June 5 – 8 June 12 – 21/22
2027 June 4 – 7 June 11 – 14 June 18 – 27/28
2028 June 2 – 5 June 9 – 12 June 16 – 25/26
2029 June 1 – 4 June 8 – 11 June 15 – 24/25
2030 May 31 – June 3 June 7 – 10 June 14 – 23/24

MCWS HISTORY: Winningest coaches | Most titles | Most appearances 

Here is more on how the tournament works:

Advertisement

What is the difference between the Division I baseball tournament and the College World Series?

The NCAA DI baseball tournament is a 64-team tournament that starts in late May. After two rounds of play (which each consist of multiple games), there are just eight teams left. These eight teams then head to Omaha, NE. for the College World Series. The CWS is the culmination of the DI tournament, where the teams compete in two brackets, with the winners of each meeting in the CWS finals, a best-of-three series to decide the NCAA champion.

When did the College World Series start?

The first-ever NCAA DI baseball tournament was in 1947, and would barely be recognized as the same tournament nowadays. The 1947 tournament featured just eight teams, which were divided into two four-team, single-elimination brackets. The two winners — California and Yale — then met in a best-of-three final in Kalamazoo, MI. California would go undefeated through the inaugural CWS and beat Yale to capture the first title.

How are teams selected for the NCAA Division I baseball tournament?

Since 1954, the NCAA DI baseball tournament field has been split into two qualifying groups: the automatic berths, and the at-large selections. Since 2025, 29 conference champions receive automatic berths, and 35 teams receive at-large bids, decided by the NCAA DI Baseball Committee.

Additional information: More on how the Men’s College World Series works

Men’s College World Series championship history

Below is a complete list of all the College World Series finals in the 76-year history of the event. Tennessee won the 2024 Men’s College World Series in three games over SEC conference foe Texas A&M.

Advertisement

The Volunteers became the first No. 1 overall seed to win the Men’s College World Series since Miami (Fla.) in 1999.

YEAR CHAMPION (RECORD) COACH WINNING SCORE RUNNER-UP SITE
2024 Tennessee (60-13) Tony Vitello 6-5 Texas A&M Omaha, Neb.
2023 LSU (54-17) Jay Johnson 18-4 Florida Omaha, Neb.
2022 Ole Miss (42-23) Mike Bianco 4-2 Oklahoma Omaha, Neb.
2021 Mississippi State (50-18) Chris Lemonis 9-0 Vanderbilt Omaha, Neb.
2020 Canceled due to Covid-19
2019 Vanderbilt (59-12) Tim Corbin 8-2 Michigan Omaha, Neb.
2018 Oregon State (55-12-1) Pat Casey 5-0 Arkansas Omaha, Neb.
2017 Florida (52-19) Kevin O’Sullivan 6-1 LSU Omaha, Neb.
2016 Coastal Carolina (55-18) Gary Gilmore 4-3 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
2015 Virginia (44-24) Brian O’Connor 4-2 Vanderbilt Omaha, Neb.
2014 Vanderbilt (51-21) Tim Corbin 3-2 Virginia Omaha, Neb.
2013 * UCLA (49-17) John Savage 8-0 Mississippi State Omaha, Neb.
2012 * Arizona (48-17) Andy Lopez 4-1 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2011 * South Carolina (55-14) Ray Tanner 5-2 Florida Omaha, Neb.
2010 South Carolina (54-16) Ray Tanner 2-1 (11 inn.) UCLA Omaha, Neb.
2009 LSU (56-17) Paul Mainieri 11-4 Texas Omaha, Neb.
2008 Fresno State (47-31) Mike Batesole 6-1 Georgia Omaha, Neb.
2007 * Oregon State (49-18) Pat Casey 9-3 North Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2006 Oregon State (50-16) Pat Casey 3-2 North Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2005 * Texas (56-16) Augie Garrido 6-2 Florida Omaha, Neb.
2004 Cal St. Fullerton (47-22) George Horton 3-2 Texas Omaha, Neb.
2003 Rice (58-12) Wayne Graham 14-2 Stanford Omaha, Neb.
2002 * Texas (57-15) Augie Garrido 12-6 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2001 * Miami (Fla.) (53-12) Jim Morris 12-1 Stanford Omaha, Neb.
2000 * LSU (52-17) Skip Bertman 6-5 Stanford Omaha, Neb.
1999 * Miami (Fla.) (50-13) Jim Morris 6-5 Florida State Omaha, Neb.
1998 Southern California (49-17) Mike Gillespie 21-14 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1997 * LSU (57-13) Skip Bertman 13-6 Alabama Omaha, Neb.
1996 * LSU (52-15) Skip Bertman 9-8 Miami (Fla.) Omaha, Neb.
1995 * Cal St. Fullerton (57-9) Augie Garrido 11-5 Southern California Omaha, Neb.
1994 * Oklahoma (50-17) Larry Cochell 13-5 Georgia Tech Omaha, Neb.
1993 LSU (53-17-1) Skip Bertman 8-0 Wichita State Omaha, Neb.
1992 * Pepperdine (48-11-1) Andy Lopez 3-2 Cal St. Fullerton Omaha, Neb.
1991 * LSU (55-18) Skip Bertman 6-3 Wichita State Omaha, Neb.
1990 Georgia (52-19) Steve Webber 2-1 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1989 Wichita State (68-16) Gene Stephenson 5-3 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1988 Stanford (46-23) Mark Marquess 9-4 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1987 Stanford (53-17) Mark Marquess 9-5 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1986 Arizona (49-19) Jerry Kindall 10-2 Florida State Omaha, Neb.
1985 Miami (Fla.) (64-16) Ron Fraser 10-6 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1984 Cal St. Fullerton (66-20) Augie Garrido 3-1 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1983 * Texas (66-14) Cliff Gustafson 4-3 Alabama Omaha, Neb.
1982 * Miami (Fla.) (55-17-1) Ron Fraser 9-3 Wichita State Omaha, Neb.
1981 Arizona State (55-13) Jim Brock 7-4 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1980 Arizona (45-21-1) Jerry Kindall 5-3 Hawaii Omaha, Neb.
1979 Cal St. Fullerton (60-14-1) Augie Garrido 2-1 Arkansas Omaha, Neb.
1978 * Southern California (54-9) Rod Dedeaux 10-3 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1977 Arizona State (57-12) Jim Brock 2-1 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
1976 Arizona (56-17) Jerry Kindall 7-1 Eastern Michigan Omaha, Neb.
1975 Texas (59-6) Cliff Gustafson 5-1 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
1974 Southern California (50-20) Rod Dedeaux 7-3 Miami (Fla.) Omaha, Neb.
1973 * Southern California (51-11) Rod Dedeaux 4-3 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1972 Southern California (47-13-1) Rod Dedeaux 1-0 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1971 Southern California (46-11) Rod Dedeaux 5-2 Southern Illinois Omaha, Neb.
1970 Southern California (45-13) Rod Dedeaux 2-1 (15 inn.) Florida State Omaha, Neb.
1969 Arizona State (56-11) Bobby Winkles 10-1 Tulsa Omaha, Neb.
1968 * Southern California (43-12-1) Rod Dedeaux 4-3 Southern Illinois Omaha, Neb.
1967 Arizona State (53-12) Bobby Winkles 11-0 Houston Omaha, Neb.
1966 Ohio State (27-6-1) Marty Karow 8-2 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1965 Arizona State (54-8) Bobby Winkles 2-0 Ohio State Omaha, Neb.
1964 Minnesota (31-12) Dick Siebert 5-1 Missouri Omaha, Neb.
1963 Southern California (35-10) Rod Dedeaux 5-2 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
1962 Michigan (34-15) Don Lund 5-4 (15 inn.) Santa Clara Omaha, Neb.
1961 * Southern California (36-7) Rod Dedeaux 1-0 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1960 Minnesota (34-7-1) Dick Siebert 2-1 (10 inn.) Southern California Omaha, Neb.
1959 Oklahoma State (27-5) Toby Greene 5-0 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
1958 Southern California (29-3) Rod Dedeaux 8-7 (12 inn.) Missouri Omaha, Neb.
1957 * California (35-10) George Wolfman 1-0 Penn State Omaha, Neb.
1956 Minnesota (37-9) Dick Siebert 12-1 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
1955 Wake Forest (29-7) Taylor Sanford 7-6 Western Michigan Omaha, Neb.
1954 Missouri (22-4) John “Hi” Simmons 4-1 Rollins Omaha, Neb.
1953 Michigan (21-9) Ray Fisher 7-5 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1952 Holy Cross (21-3) Jack Barry 8-4 Missouri Omaha, Neb.
1951 * Oklahoma (19-9) Jack Baer 3-2 Tennessee Omaha, Neb.
1950 Texas (27-6) Bibb Falk 3-0 Washington State Omaha, Neb.
1949 * Texas (23-7) Bibb Falk 10-3 Wake Forest Wichita, Kan.
1948 Southern California (26-4) Sam Barry 9-2 Yale Kalamazoo, Mich.
1947 * California (31-10) Clint Evans 8-7 Yale Kalamazoo, Mich.

 *Indicates undefeated teams in College World Series play.



Source link

Austin, TX

Democrats go statewide in Texas House races

Published

on

Democrats go statewide in Texas House races


AUSTIN — For the first time in modern Texas politics, Democrats will field candidates in every one of the state’s 150 House districts.

It’s a milestone party leaders hope will boost turnout, money and organization up and down the ballot, even as Gov. Greg Abbott enters the cycle with a well-tested ground game of his own.

Democratic leaders say the move is less about flipping deeply red districts and more about expanding the electorate and forcing Republicans to defend territory they have long taken for granted.

Houston Rep. Christina Morales, the new chief of the Texas House Democratic Campaign Committee, said a full slate of candidates creates infrastructure that can benefit statewide races, regardless of the odds in individual districts.

Advertisement

Breaking News

Get the latest breaking news from North Texas and beyond.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Campaigns that once existed only on paper now bring door-knocking, phone banking and voter registration efforts, she said.

Morales also is coordinating with national Democrats, trying to harness energy from Texas’ high-profile Senate race, marked by a bitter GOP feud.

Advertisement

In that primary, incumbent Sen. John Cornyn faces Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt of Houston.

The Democratic Senate contest, featuring state Rep. James Talarico of Austin and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Dallas, has drawn wide voter interest and donor support.

But attention and money only go so far.

Abbott enters the cycle with a major advantage: a mature, statewide voter-mobilization network built over decades of Republican control.

“Abbott has made it his own,” said longtime GOP strategist Thomas Graham, citing sustained relationship-building at the precinct level and focus on local concerns. “Democrats are still rebuilding a statewide party. The ground game heavily favors the governor.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Environmental experts say Texas data centers come with uncertainty

Published

on

Environmental experts say Texas data centers come with uncertainty


The main switchyard at a Midlothian power plant. The federal government is sending Texas more than $60 million to strengthen the state’s power grid. Credit: Shelby Tauber for The Texas Tribune

Texas is home to approximately 400 data centers — some currently operational, others still under construction and a number that are still in the planning stages. Experts say the boom comes with a lot of uncertainty.

Texas data center power demand

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

“Data centers are a relatively large power demand in a small area, something like, you know, 100 or 200 megawatts of power. That’s more than a small city or a small town would be consuming itself,” said Carey King, a research scientist with the Energy Institute at the University of Texas at Austin.

Over the past year, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas has received more than 200 gigawatts worth of large load interconnection requests, approximately 73% of which are from data centers. That has led to questions about whether the state’s grid is up to the task of supplying power to the facilities.

Advertisement

“Many of us who suffered through winter storm Uri still have PTSD over, you know, fears that the grid won’t be able to meet demand,” said Luke Metzger, the executive director of Environment Texas, a local nonprofit working to safeguard the state’s natural environment.

Question of infrastructure

That’s not the only question. King points out that there is also a question of whether all the proposed data centers will actually be built. He says if they don’t end up materializing, it could spell trouble for anyone making investment decisions based on the projections. And if infrastructure is built to accommodate the needs of projects that never come to fruition, those costs could be passed off to consumers in the form of higher rates.

Advertisement

Experts say these speculative data center projects have led to uncertainty around how much power will actually be needed to meet the demands of the state’s data centers.

Senate Bill 6, which was signed into law last June, outlined new requirements for data center projects, including stipulating that data centers put up more capital up front for things like transmission studies and interconnection fees. The bill is, in part, intended to reduce some of that uncertainty around speculative power loads.

Advertisement

Potential environmental impact

But concerns still remain around the potential environmental impact of the state’s data centers.

“There are an estimated 130 new gas-powered power plants that have been proposed for Texas, in part to meet this demand for data centers, and if they’re all built, that’s going to have as much climate pollution as 27 million cars,” said Metzger.

Advertisement

Above all, Metzger says the biggest uncertainty is water, as there is no central entity in the state that collects and compiles information on those needs.

On average, a single data center consumes millions of gallons of water annually, according to researchers with the University of Michigan. Metzger says that’s of particular concern here in Texas, where water supply is already being pushed to its limits.

“Texas is a very drought-prone state, and already, you know, you know, according to the Water Development Board, you know, we don’t have enough supply to meet demand,” said Metzger. “There is no way to make more water. And so, I think ultimately, you know that that could be the greatest concern for the state.”

Advertisement

Over the past year, residents across Central Texas have spoken out about data centers in places like Round Rock and Taylor, citing additional concerns including falling property values, noise, and health impacts.

What’s next:

Advertisement

Moving forward, experts recommend that local leaders undergo long-range planning to determine whether they’re able to allocate limited resources to data centers in the long run prior to approving these projects.

The Source: Information in this article comes from FOX 7 interviews with experts. 

TexasTechnologyEnvironment
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Silver Alert issued for missing 73-year-old man in Austin

Published

on

Silver Alert issued for missing 73-year-old man in Austin


The Texas Department of Public Safety has issued a Silver Alert for an elderly man who has been missing since Friday afternoon in Austin.

The Austin Police Department is looking for Charles Evans, a 73-year-old man diagnosed with a cognitive impairment. Evans was last seen at 5:37 p.m. on Jan. 9 in Austin.

Silver Alert issued for missing 73-year-old man in Austin

ALSO| Students recount emotional toll of Leander High School possible bomb threat lockdown

Advertisement

Police describe him as a 6’3″ tall white male, weighing 225 pounds, has gray hair, hazel eyes, and who uses a walker.

Law enforcement officials believe his disappearance poses a credible threat to his health and safety.

Anyone with information regarding his whereabouts is urged to contact the Austin Police Department at 512-974-5000.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending