Connect with us

Austin, TX

What to Know About the Shooting in Austin

Published

on

What to Know About the Shooting in Austin


Federal investigators are looking into whether a shooting in Austin, Texas, on Sunday—that involved a gunman opening fire at a downtown beer garden, killing two and wounding 14—constitutes a potential act of terrorism.

Alex Doran, the acting special agent in charge of the FBI’s San Antonio Field Office, said in a press conference that while it’s still too early to determine a motive, authorities found “indicators” on the alleged gunman and in his vehicle that “indicate potential nexus to terrorism.”

The suspected gunman, who was reportedly wearing clothes that bore “Property of Allah” and an Iranian flag design, was shot dead in a standoff with law enforcement. 

The shooting happened just a day after the U.S. and Israel launched a major military campaign against Iran. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Donald Trump was briefed on the shooting.

Advertisement

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican who expressed support for the latest Iran strike, said in a statement: “To anyone who thinks about using the current conflict in the Middle East to threaten Texans or our critical infrastructure, understand this clearly: Texas will respond with decisive and overwhelming force to protect our state.” A day before the incident, Abbott directed the Texas Military Department to activate service members to “work alongside state and federal partners to safeguard our communities and critical infrastructure,” and he directed the state’s Department of Public Safety and the Texas National Guard, to “intensify patrols and surveillance.” 

Here’s what to know.

What happened?

Shortly before 2 a.m. Sunday, the suspect circled past Buford’s Backyard Beer Garden on Sixth Street several times in a “large SUV,” before stopping and opening fire with a pistol out of the vehicle window at people on the patio and gathered outside the bar, Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis said in a press briefing on Sunday.

The suspect parked the vehicle, stepped out with an assault rifle, and started firing at people on the street, according to Davis. Officers responding to the incident shot and killed the gunman.

The shooting took place along Sixth Street, a popular nightlife and entertainment district located a few miles from the University of Texas at Austin. Three people, including the suspect, were killed, and 14 were injured in the attack. All of those injured were transported to local hospitals, with three in critical condition, Austin EMS Chief Robert Luckritz said at the Sunday briefing. The names of the victims were released as of Sunday night.

Advertisement

Jim Davis, president of UT Austin, confirmed in a statement that members of the university community were among those affected by the shooting, although they have not been publicly identified. “Our prayers are with the victims and all those impacted, including members of our Longhorn family, and my heart goes out to their families, friends, classmates, professors, and loved ones,” Davis said. “As Longhorns, we feel this pain together.”

What do we know about the suspect?

The Austin Police Department identified the suspect as Ndiaga Diagne, a 53-year-old man. Diagne, who was born in Senegal, officials told the Associated Press, first came to the U.S. in 2000 on a B-2 tourist visa, according to a Department of Homeland Security statement to the AP. He married a U.S. citizen in 2006 and became a lawful permanent resident, before becoming a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2013.

A law enforcement official briefed on the case told CNN that Diagne was wearing a shirt with an Iranian flag design and a hoodie emblazoned with “Property of Allah.” The AP also reported the words and symbols on his clothes, also citing a law enforcement official. 

The Austin American-Statesman reported that investigators searched a house in Pflugerville, north of Austin, linked to Diagne’s possible relative. Local television station KXAN reported that Diagne had been issued a driver’s license with an address in Pflugerville in 2017.

Neighbors speaking to the New York Times said Diagne had maintained a low profile. “They kept very much to themselves,” Chris Finch, who lived next to the searched home, said. “They didn’t really say hi or anything.”

Advertisement

Another neighbor and the president of the neighborhood’s homeowners association, Eddie Garcia, said he was never aware of any previous issues. “We’re all neighbors and respect each other but we are also private and keep to ourselves,” he told the Statesman.

How are authorities reacting?

Mayor Kirk Watson called the shooting “an extremely difficult, traumatic moment” for the city. 

Senator Ted Cruz (R, Texas) said the shooting was a “senseless act of violence” and that he and his team are coordinating with local, state, and federal authorities over the incident.

Other Texas politicians have been united in condemning the shooting and extending condolences to victims and their loved ones, but they have been divided along partisan lines as to what’s to blame for the attack.

In a statement posted on X, eight Democrats in the Texas state legislature, including U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico, said, “Gun violence continues to steal the lives of far too many Texans. Our hearts are with the victims of today’s shooting and their families. We will never stop fighting for them.”

Advertisement

Rep. Greg Casar (D, Texas) posted, “We must end America’s gun violence epidemic. Americans should be able to have fun at a bar without it turning into an unspeakable nightmare like this one— and I will redouble my efforts in Congress to prevent the next tragedy like this.”

“Gun violence is preventable. This devastating loss of life was preventable,” Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D, Texas) posted on X. “Until Republicans find the courage to say no to the NRA, our country will be plagued with more tragedies.”

Republicans, on the other hand, have blamed the attack on Islamic extremism and mass migration. Rep. Chip Roy (R, Texas) said, in response to Doggett, that “Muslim immigrant violence – naturalized or not – is preventable. Until Democrats (& Republicans) find the courage to say no to the mass migration of Islamists, our country will be plagued with more tragedies…”

In another post, Roy said the shooting in Austin was “carried out by a suspected Islamist who came on a tourist VISA, and OVERSTAYED for years,” adding that the “tragedy was preventable” and that “failed policies have real consequences.”

“Allowing unvetted immigrants who are hostile to America, who are loyal to our adversaries like Iran, must end,” Abbott, the Republican governor, said in response to a call by Talarico for stricter gun regulations. “The way to end it is to end the current open immigration policies.” (Talarico responded, “Dangerous people should not be allowed into the country. Dangerous people should not be allowed to get guns.”)

Advertisement

The Texas chapter of the Muslim rights advocacy group Council on American-Islamic Relations condemned the shooting in a statement, but it also rejected using the incident to attack the larger Muslim community. 

“While a single person carried out this heinous attack last night, hundreds of thousands of Texas Muslims finished their night prayers and headed to their homes while calling on God for global peace and justice,” the statement said. “We encourage elected officials, law enforcement, faith leaders, and community members to come together to support the families of the victims and reaffirm our shared commitment to public safety.”



Source link

Austin, TX

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State

Published

on

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State


Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said Tuesday she will leave the post next month.

What we know:

Advertisement

In a statement, Nelson said her resignation will be effective July 17 but did not provide a reason for the departure.

“It has been an honor to serve the people of Texas in this role,” Nelson said. “My time as Secretary came at an important moment for Texas, and I am proud of what we have been able to accomplish as an agency in under four years.”

Nelson has served in the role since 2023.

Advertisement

Among other things, the Secretary of State oversees elections and business filings in the state and serves as the chief diplomat of Texas.

View of Texas State Senator Jane Nelson, during the 80th Texas Legislature, on the floor of the Senate at the Texas State Capitol, Austin, Texas, January 22, 2007. (John Anderson/The Austin Chronicle / Getty Images)

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott described Nelson as extraordinary.

“I am deeply grateful for her long and loyal service and outstanding leadership. She has represented our state with grace and honor across the globe, and Texas is better because of it,” Abbott said. “Cecilia and I wish her all the best in the next chapter of her distinguished career.”

Advertisement

Dig deeper:

According to the Secretary of State’s office, Nelson has presided over seven statewide elections during her tenure with a cumulative 27 million ballots cast and broke a record with more than 3 million active business filers.

Advertisement

Nelson also served three decades in the Texas Senate, where she remains the longest-serving Republican in state history.

The Source: Information in this story came from the Texas Secretary of State’s office.

TexasElectionPoliticsTexas Politics2026 ElectionsAustinGreg Abbott
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Austin OKs $2.35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election

Published

on

Austin OKs .35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election


Austin Mayor Kirk Watson wants the city council to hold off on a bond measure this year to set up a better proposal in 2028.

Michael Dorman

Austin, Texas, is revving up to sell $2.35 billion of debt for a convention center and a wastewater treatment plant, while a legal battle continues over bonds to help finance a light rail system. 

Processing Content

Advertisement

The bond boom comes as the city council voted on Thursday to pursue the development of a $390 million baseline general obligation bond package for the November ballot despite a call by Mayor Kirk Watson to wait until 2028.

“I believe we can and we should bring forward significant investments in the future,” he said. “In fact, if we restore compliance with our financial policies and we maintain the discipline we actually will have greater future capacity to do more for this community in 2028.”

A bond election would follow the rejection of a maintenance and operations property tax hike by 63% of city voters in November. In the wake of the defeat, Austin officials took steps to better manage its finances, including pursuing a citywide performance and efficiency audit of city operations.

The city, which last held a successful GO bond election in 2022 for $350 million of debt for affordable housing, had $1.03 billion of unissued voter-approved GO bond authorization as of the Sept. 30 end of fiscal 2025. Last year, Austin sold $796 million of GO bonds and certificates of obligation in a deal rated triple-A with stable outlooks by S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings.

On Thursday, the city council signed off on a $34.5 million wrongful prosecution and conviction settlement with four individuals to be financed through the sale of non-voter-approved GO bonds. 

Advertisement

The council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds on May 21 for a $1.6 billion project to replace the city’s now-demolished convention center with a facility that will increase rentable event space to 620,000 square feet from 365,000 square feet.

Construction site for Austin convention center project
Construction site for Austin’s convention center project, shown in March. The city council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds for a bigger convention center.

Rich Saskal

The bonds are backed with revenue from certain city hotel occupancy taxes and incremental state tax revenue generated within a project finance zone the city established in 2024. Amounts and timings for issuing the debt are being determined, according to the city, which filed a petition with a Travis County District Court for an expedited validation of the bonds. 

An ordinance approved in October to issue up to an initial $650 million of bonds for the project was rescinded by the council.

The city also plans to refund hotel occupancy tax-backed debt issued for the prior convention center in order to pledge a 4.5% hotel tax for the upcoming bonds. 

Advertisement

“The refunding bonds are a separate, but related item to the expansion bonds and will only be secured by 2% venue HOT,” city documents said. “The 2% venue HOT will not be pledged to the expansion bonds and will cease to be collected upon final maturity or early payoff of (the refunding bonds).” 

A petition drive that would have delayed the project fell 494 signatures short of a requirement for 20,000 valid signatures of registered voters, Austin City Clerk Erika Brady determined in November.

Petition backers are appealing a district court’s refusal to force validation in state appellate court after the Texas Supreme Court dismissed their petition for a writ of mandamus, according to attorneys.

The petition drive by Austin United PAC and others sought a ballot measure to stop the demolition and reconstruction of the convention center for seven years — or until the project was approved by voters — and prioritize city funding for local live music, arts, cultural, and outdoor tourism. 

The Austin City Council also approved as much as $1 billion of water and wastewater system revenue bonds last month for the Walnut Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and enhancement project. The bonds will be used to obtain a direct low-interest loan from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act program. 

Advertisement

Other financing sources for the $1.5 billion project are $59 million from the Texas Water Development Board Clean Water State Revolving Fund program and funding from Austin Water.

A groundbreaking for the project, which is aimed at improving treatment processes and protecting the Colorado River, was held in April.

The plant, which serves more than 50% of Austin and operates at a treatment capacity of 75 million gallons per day, will have its capacity increased to 100 MGD, helping meet future demand and requirements set by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for Austin’s projected growth of 1.5 million by 2040, according to a city statement.

A legal logjam over a light rail system eased May 22 when the Texas Supreme Court finally ruled on a procedural issue related to an initial $150 million of bonds for the project. The high court ordered a Travis County Court judge to decide whether the bonds’ issuer, the Austin Transit Partnership, a nonprofit corporation created by the city and Capital Metro Transportation Authority, has standing to seek court validation for the debt.

City taxpayers who filed a lawsuit in 2023, along with the Texas Attorney General’s Office have been challenging the legality of the bonds, which would be paid off with a portion of Austin’s operation and maintenance property taxes voters approved in November 2020 for what was then billed as a 27-mile, 31-station light-rail project estimated to cost $7.1 billion.

Advertisement

Escalating costs led ATP to downsize Project Connect to an initial less than 10-mile, 15-station system with a similar price tag. The completion of a federal environmental review in January allowed the project to continue a process to seek billions of dollars in federal grants and loans.

ATP said Project Connect is moving forward with construction scheduled to begin next year.  

“We are confident in our case and look forward to our day in court,” ATP said in a statement. “The pending litigation has not slowed our progress advancing Austin light rail, which has hit major milestones in the federal funding process, design, and pre-construction work this year.” 

Bill Aleshire, an attorney who filed the taxpayers’ lawsuit, cautioned that several issues remain before the court, including the legality of the downsized project and the ability to pay off bonds with property tax revenue that is supposed to be used for operations. 

“Their federal funding is uncertain, their ability to issue bonds is uncertain, and they just stubbornly will not listen to us and say it’s time to pause Project Connect and rethink it, that maybe rail isn’t the best way to go at this time and maybe we can’t afford it at this time,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas commission on law enforcement head testifies in Austin, creates controversy

Published

on

Texas commission on law enforcement head testifies in Austin, creates controversy


AUSTIN, Texas (KTRK) — Does the state of Texas have too many law enforcement agencies? That was a topic of discussion at a Texas House Committee meeting on May 28, which focused on police standards and policy.

It was comments from TCOLE Deputy Chief TJ Vineyard that drew the attention of unions and lobbying groups representing law enforcement across Texas.

“We’re starting to look now at encouraging the consolidation of agencies,” Vineyard said during the nearly eight-hour-long hearing.

The response was almost immediate from groups representing various aspects of law enforcement.

Advertisement

One social media post on Facebook from the Texas Law Enforcement Association proclaimed concern about the future of smaller departments across the state, despite an exchange later in the hearing between the committee chair, State Representative Cole Hefner, and TCOLE’s Executive Director, Chief Gregory Stevens.

“We’re not taking police off the street?” Hefner asked. “We’re making sure that we have qualified people that are equipped and trained.”

“One hundred percent,” Stevens said.

According to TCOLE’s own numbers, there are more than 2,700 accredited agencies and some 83,000 peace officers.

The chair asked whether 2,700 was a good or bad thing, given that Texas has more agencies than the next four largest states combined.

Advertisement

“There is a lot of duplicative coverage,” Stevens said, “overlapping coverage. When it comes to resources, it can be inefficient.”

Also speaking on the panel was Jennifer Szimanski with the Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT), which also posted on social media about the hearing. While the group wouldn’t comment directly about consolidation, Szimanski told ABC13 that “consolidation is not the legislative intent for TCOLE” and that “we should be forward-looking and raising standards”.

But in a conversation with ABC13, Stevens said targeting smaller departments is not their intent. TCOLE wants every department, regardless of size, to comply with the higher standards implemented in 2023.

“Some of the things that are out there surfing out across social media and on other platforms is that TCOLE wants to shut down small agencies and let sheriff’s offices take over, and that’s absolutely not true. It couldn’t be further from what we’re doing,” Stevens said. “It doesn’t matter about the size of the agencies, and I want to be really clear on that point. TECOL is not out to shut down or to make life hard on a small municipal agency, a school district, police department, or what have you.”

But the larger conversation is not limited to the state of Texas.

Advertisement

Harris County is home to more than 60 agencies. In the last major study on overlap in 2018, Rice University’s Kinder Institute found that consolidation could help address inefficiencies. Kyle Shelton, now at the University of Minnesota, co-authored the report eight years ago.

“It’s really just an opportunity to look at how regional governments, which are often overlapping, best coordinate and collaborate on the services that they’re providing,” Shelton told ABC13.

Whether it’s Harris County or the state of Texas, the cost of funding and maintaining law enforcement agencies is getting more expensive. While consolidation may not be the answer, it is part of a conversation in which Kyle Shelton says governments should be engaging.

“It’s not a quick band-aid to pull off and say, ‘Hey, look, we fixed the budget crisis, or, you know, addressed some efficiencies here in a nice, neat three-month process,” Shelton said. “You know, it likely takes years and a lot of trust building, both with residents and the agencies.”

Texas does have more law enforcement agencies than the next four largest states combined, according to TCOLE.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 KTRK-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending