Connect with us

Austin, TX

2025 NCAA baseball bracket: Men's College World Series scores, schedule

Published

on

2025 NCAA baseball bracket: Men's College World Series scores, schedule


The 2025 NCAA Division I baseball tournament is here. It began with a 64-team field competing in regionals, then moved to 16 teams at super regionals before an eight-team field in the Men’s College World Series in Omaha, Nebraska, from June 13 to June 22/23. 

The MCWS will feature two double-elimination brackets with the two winners meeting in a best-of-three championship series. The 64-team tournament bracket was announced on Monday, May 26.

⚾️ MORE BASEBALL ⚾️

Below, you can find all the information about the 2025 NCAA DI men’s tournament — regional, super regional and Men’s College World Series. 

Advertisement

2025 NCAA DI baseball tournament bracket

Here is the bracket for the Men’s College World Series

➡️ Interactive bracket | Regional brackets

2025 NCAA DI baseball tournament schedule  

All times ET.

  • MCWS games: Starts Friday, June 13  (all times ET)
    • Saturday, June 14
    • Sunday, June 15

    • Monday, June 16

    • Tuesday, June 17

    • Wednesday, June 18
  • MCWS finals: Saturday – Sunday/Monday, June 21-22/23

  • Selection show: Monday, May 26 at Noon ET
  • Regionals: Friday-Monday, May 30-June 2
    • Nashville Regional, Nashville, Tennessee
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Hattiesburg Regional, Hattiesburg, Mississippi
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Tallahassee Regional, Tallahassee, Florida
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Corvallis Regional, Corvallis, Oregon
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Chapel Hill Regional, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Eugene Regional, Eugene Oregon
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Conway Regional, Conway, South Carolina
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Auburn Regional, Auburn, Alabama
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Austin Regional, Austin, Texas
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Los Angeles Regional, Los Angeles, California
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Oxford Regional, Oxford, Mississippi
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Athens Regional, Athens, Georgia
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Baton Rouge Regional, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Clemson Regional, Clemson, South Carolina
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
    • Knoxville Regional, Knoxville, Tennessee
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
      • Monday, June 2
    • Fayetteville Regional, Fayetteville, Arkansas
      • Friday, May 30
      • Saturday, May 31
      • Sunday, June 1
  • Super Regionals: Friday-Monday, June 6-9
    • Auburn Super Regional, Auburn, Alabama
      • Friday, June 6
      • Saturday, June 7
    • Baton Rouge Super Regional, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
    • Chapel Hill Super Regional, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
      • Friday, June 6
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
    • Corvallis Super Regional, Corvallis, Oregon
      • Friday, June 6
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
    • Durham Super Regional. Durham, North Carolina
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
      • Monday, June 9
    • Fayetteville Super Regional, Fayetteville, Arkansas
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
    • Los Angeles Super Regional, Los Angeles, California
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8
    • Louisville Super Regional, Louisville, Kentucky
      • Friday, June 6
      • Saturday, June 7
      • Sunday, June 8

How to get tickets for the Men’s College World Series

The Men’s College World Series will be played at Charles Schwab Field Omaha in Omaha, NE. You can find all the ticket info for the 2025 MCWS here.

Baseball Championship: Future dates

Year REGIONALS SUPER REGIONALS MCWS
2026 May 29 – June 1 June 5 – 8 June 12 – 21/22
2027 June 4 – 7 June 11 – 14 June 18 – 27/28
2028 June 2 – 5 June 9 – 12 June 16 – 25/26
2029 June 1 – 4 June 8 – 11 June 15 – 24/25
2030 May 31 – June 3 June 7 – 10 June 14 – 23/24

MCWS HISTORY: Winningest coaches | Most titles | Most appearances 

Here is more on how the tournament works:

Advertisement

What is the difference between the Division I baseball tournament and the College World Series?

The NCAA DI baseball tournament is a 64-team tournament that starts in late May. After two rounds of play (which each consist of multiple games), there are just eight teams left. These eight teams then head to Omaha, NE. for the College World Series. The CWS is the culmination of the DI tournament, where the teams compete in two brackets, with the winners of each meeting in the CWS finals, a best-of-three series to decide the NCAA champion.

When did the College World Series start?

The first-ever NCAA DI baseball tournament was in 1947, and would barely be recognized as the same tournament nowadays. The 1947 tournament featured just eight teams, which were divided into two four-team, single-elimination brackets. The two winners — California and Yale — then met in a best-of-three final in Kalamazoo, MI. California would go undefeated through the inaugural CWS and beat Yale to capture the first title.

How are teams selected for the NCAA Division I baseball tournament?

Since 1954, the NCAA DI baseball tournament field has been split into two qualifying groups: the automatic berths, and the at-large selections. Since 2025, 29 conference champions receive automatic berths, and 35 teams receive at-large bids, decided by the NCAA DI Baseball Committee.

Additional information: More on how the Men’s College World Series works

Men’s College World Series championship history

Below is a complete list of all the College World Series finals in the 76-year history of the event. Tennessee won the 2024 Men’s College World Series in three games over SEC conference foe Texas A&M.

Advertisement

The Volunteers became the first No. 1 overall seed to win the Men’s College World Series since Miami (Fla.) in 1999.

YEAR CHAMPION (RECORD) COACH WINNING SCORE RUNNER-UP SITE
2024 Tennessee (60-13) Tony Vitello 6-5 Texas A&M Omaha, Neb.
2023 LSU (54-17) Jay Johnson 18-4 Florida Omaha, Neb.
2022 Ole Miss (42-23) Mike Bianco 4-2 Oklahoma Omaha, Neb.
2021 Mississippi State (50-18) Chris Lemonis 9-0 Vanderbilt Omaha, Neb.
2020 Canceled due to Covid-19
2019 Vanderbilt (59-12) Tim Corbin 8-2 Michigan Omaha, Neb.
2018 Oregon State (55-12-1) Pat Casey 5-0 Arkansas Omaha, Neb.
2017 Florida (52-19) Kevin O’Sullivan 6-1 LSU Omaha, Neb.
2016 Coastal Carolina (55-18) Gary Gilmore 4-3 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
2015 Virginia (44-24) Brian O’Connor 4-2 Vanderbilt Omaha, Neb.
2014 Vanderbilt (51-21) Tim Corbin 3-2 Virginia Omaha, Neb.
2013 * UCLA (49-17) John Savage 8-0 Mississippi State Omaha, Neb.
2012 * Arizona (48-17) Andy Lopez 4-1 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2011 * South Carolina (55-14) Ray Tanner 5-2 Florida Omaha, Neb.
2010 South Carolina (54-16) Ray Tanner 2-1 (11 inn.) UCLA Omaha, Neb.
2009 LSU (56-17) Paul Mainieri 11-4 Texas Omaha, Neb.
2008 Fresno State (47-31) Mike Batesole 6-1 Georgia Omaha, Neb.
2007 * Oregon State (49-18) Pat Casey 9-3 North Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2006 Oregon State (50-16) Pat Casey 3-2 North Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2005 * Texas (56-16) Augie Garrido 6-2 Florida Omaha, Neb.
2004 Cal St. Fullerton (47-22) George Horton 3-2 Texas Omaha, Neb.
2003 Rice (58-12) Wayne Graham 14-2 Stanford Omaha, Neb.
2002 * Texas (57-15) Augie Garrido 12-6 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
2001 * Miami (Fla.) (53-12) Jim Morris 12-1 Stanford Omaha, Neb.
2000 * LSU (52-17) Skip Bertman 6-5 Stanford Omaha, Neb.
1999 * Miami (Fla.) (50-13) Jim Morris 6-5 Florida State Omaha, Neb.
1998 Southern California (49-17) Mike Gillespie 21-14 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1997 * LSU (57-13) Skip Bertman 13-6 Alabama Omaha, Neb.
1996 * LSU (52-15) Skip Bertman 9-8 Miami (Fla.) Omaha, Neb.
1995 * Cal St. Fullerton (57-9) Augie Garrido 11-5 Southern California Omaha, Neb.
1994 * Oklahoma (50-17) Larry Cochell 13-5 Georgia Tech Omaha, Neb.
1993 LSU (53-17-1) Skip Bertman 8-0 Wichita State Omaha, Neb.
1992 * Pepperdine (48-11-1) Andy Lopez 3-2 Cal St. Fullerton Omaha, Neb.
1991 * LSU (55-18) Skip Bertman 6-3 Wichita State Omaha, Neb.
1990 Georgia (52-19) Steve Webber 2-1 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1989 Wichita State (68-16) Gene Stephenson 5-3 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1988 Stanford (46-23) Mark Marquess 9-4 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1987 Stanford (53-17) Mark Marquess 9-5 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1986 Arizona (49-19) Jerry Kindall 10-2 Florida State Omaha, Neb.
1985 Miami (Fla.) (64-16) Ron Fraser 10-6 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1984 Cal St. Fullerton (66-20) Augie Garrido 3-1 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1983 * Texas (66-14) Cliff Gustafson 4-3 Alabama Omaha, Neb.
1982 * Miami (Fla.) (55-17-1) Ron Fraser 9-3 Wichita State Omaha, Neb.
1981 Arizona State (55-13) Jim Brock 7-4 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1980 Arizona (45-21-1) Jerry Kindall 5-3 Hawaii Omaha, Neb.
1979 Cal St. Fullerton (60-14-1) Augie Garrido 2-1 Arkansas Omaha, Neb.
1978 * Southern California (54-9) Rod Dedeaux 10-3 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1977 Arizona State (57-12) Jim Brock 2-1 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
1976 Arizona (56-17) Jerry Kindall 7-1 Eastern Michigan Omaha, Neb.
1975 Texas (59-6) Cliff Gustafson 5-1 South Carolina Omaha, Neb.
1974 Southern California (50-20) Rod Dedeaux 7-3 Miami (Fla.) Omaha, Neb.
1973 * Southern California (51-11) Rod Dedeaux 4-3 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1972 Southern California (47-13-1) Rod Dedeaux 1-0 Arizona State Omaha, Neb.
1971 Southern California (46-11) Rod Dedeaux 5-2 Southern Illinois Omaha, Neb.
1970 Southern California (45-13) Rod Dedeaux 2-1 (15 inn.) Florida State Omaha, Neb.
1969 Arizona State (56-11) Bobby Winkles 10-1 Tulsa Omaha, Neb.
1968 * Southern California (43-12-1) Rod Dedeaux 4-3 Southern Illinois Omaha, Neb.
1967 Arizona State (53-12) Bobby Winkles 11-0 Houston Omaha, Neb.
1966 Ohio State (27-6-1) Marty Karow 8-2 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1965 Arizona State (54-8) Bobby Winkles 2-0 Ohio State Omaha, Neb.
1964 Minnesota (31-12) Dick Siebert 5-1 Missouri Omaha, Neb.
1963 Southern California (35-10) Rod Dedeaux 5-2 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
1962 Michigan (34-15) Don Lund 5-4 (15 inn.) Santa Clara Omaha, Neb.
1961 * Southern California (36-7) Rod Dedeaux 1-0 Oklahoma State Omaha, Neb.
1960 Minnesota (34-7-1) Dick Siebert 2-1 (10 inn.) Southern California Omaha, Neb.
1959 Oklahoma State (27-5) Toby Greene 5-0 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
1958 Southern California (29-3) Rod Dedeaux 8-7 (12 inn.) Missouri Omaha, Neb.
1957 * California (35-10) George Wolfman 1-0 Penn State Omaha, Neb.
1956 Minnesota (37-9) Dick Siebert 12-1 Arizona Omaha, Neb.
1955 Wake Forest (29-7) Taylor Sanford 7-6 Western Michigan Omaha, Neb.
1954 Missouri (22-4) John “Hi” Simmons 4-1 Rollins Omaha, Neb.
1953 Michigan (21-9) Ray Fisher 7-5 Texas Omaha, Neb.
1952 Holy Cross (21-3) Jack Barry 8-4 Missouri Omaha, Neb.
1951 * Oklahoma (19-9) Jack Baer 3-2 Tennessee Omaha, Neb.
1950 Texas (27-6) Bibb Falk 3-0 Washington State Omaha, Neb.
1949 * Texas (23-7) Bibb Falk 10-3 Wake Forest Wichita, Kan.
1948 Southern California (26-4) Sam Barry 9-2 Yale Kalamazoo, Mich.
1947 * California (31-10) Clint Evans 8-7 Yale Kalamazoo, Mich.

 *Indicates undefeated teams in College World Series play.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Austin, TX

New Texas law tightens rules for autonomous vehicle companies, including Waymo

Published

on

New Texas law tightens rules for autonomous vehicle companies, including Waymo


Self-driving cars have become a common sight on Austin streets, but a new Texas law is adding tougher requirements for the companies behind the wheelless vehicles.

Senate Bill 2807 imposes stricter rules on autonomous vehicle companies operating in the state, including state authorization, emergency response plans for law enforcement, and a public portal where residents can verify operators and file safety complaints.

The changes come as Austin continues to track incidents involving autonomous vehicles. The city’s autonomous vehicle dashboard shows 75 incidents in 2026, including a collision, eight near misses, and seven incidents of ignoring police direction.

Attorney Drew Gibbs, a partner at Slingshot Law, said one crash involved a Waymo vehicle.

Advertisement

“There was a T-bone collision. A pretty serious T-bone collision where a Waymo just crashed into the side of my client’s vehicle,” Gibbs said.

ALSO| Waymo files voluntary software recall over flooded-lane risks on high-speed roads

KEYE

Advertisement

One of the incidents of ignoring police direction happened during the mass shooting on West Sixth Street back in March, when three people died, and 15 others were injured.

Austin Police Association President Michael Bullock said autonomous vehicles can struggle in unusual situations.

“It didn’t impede on anything in the moment, but it’s not necessarily uncommon where these vehicles don’t quite know how to deal with these one-off scenarios,” Bullock said.

The new law requires autonomous vehicle companies to be authorized by the state, to provide an emergency response plan for law enforcement, and to participate in a public-facing portal that allows the public to verify operators and submit safety complaints.

Kara Kockelman, a professor of transportation and engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, welcomed the added oversight.

Advertisement

“I’m glad that the state is taking this a bit more seriously now,” she said. “It’s important not to just let others slip in without kind of meeting those basic minimums.”

Bullock said the emergency planning requirement may not make a major difference in fast-moving situations. Asked how impactful it is to have a fully laid out emergency response plan, Bullock said, “These plans are great, but it takes time to work through all of those versus the immediacy of having someone behind the wheel.”

The four autonomous vehicle companies operating in Austin — Waymo, Zoox, AV-Ride, and Tesla — are all state-authorized.

The Texas DMV said an autonomous vehicle company can lose its authorization to operate in Texas if the agency deems the vehicles are operating in a way that endangers public safety.

Waymo was contacted for comment, but had not responded.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State

Published

on

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State


Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said Tuesday she will leave the post next month.

What we know:

Advertisement

In a statement, Nelson said her resignation will be effective July 17 but did not provide a reason for the departure.

“It has been an honor to serve the people of Texas in this role,” Nelson said. “My time as Secretary came at an important moment for Texas, and I am proud of what we have been able to accomplish as an agency in under four years.”

Nelson has served in the role since 2023.

Advertisement

Among other things, the Secretary of State oversees elections and business filings in the state and serves as the chief diplomat of Texas.

View of Texas State Senator Jane Nelson, during the 80th Texas Legislature, on the floor of the Senate at the Texas State Capitol, Austin, Texas, January 22, 2007. (John Anderson/The Austin Chronicle / Getty Images)

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott described Nelson as extraordinary.

“I am deeply grateful for her long and loyal service and outstanding leadership. She has represented our state with grace and honor across the globe, and Texas is better because of it,” Abbott said. “Cecilia and I wish her all the best in the next chapter of her distinguished career.”

Advertisement

Dig deeper:

According to the Secretary of State’s office, Nelson has presided over seven statewide elections during her tenure with a cumulative 27 million ballots cast and broke a record with more than 3 million active business filers.

Advertisement

Nelson also served three decades in the Texas Senate, where she remains the longest-serving Republican in state history.

The Source: Information in this story came from the Texas Secretary of State’s office.

TexasElectionPoliticsTexas Politics2026 ElectionsAustinGreg Abbott
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Austin OKs $2.35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election

Published

on

Austin OKs .35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election


Austin Mayor Kirk Watson wants the city council to hold off on a bond measure this year to set up a better proposal in 2028.

Michael Dorman

Austin, Texas, is revving up to sell $2.35 billion of debt for a convention center and a wastewater treatment plant, while a legal battle continues over bonds to help finance a light rail system. 

Processing Content

Advertisement

The bond boom comes as the city council voted on Thursday to pursue the development of a $390 million baseline general obligation bond package for the November ballot despite a call by Mayor Kirk Watson to wait until 2028.

“I believe we can and we should bring forward significant investments in the future,” he said. “In fact, if we restore compliance with our financial policies and we maintain the discipline we actually will have greater future capacity to do more for this community in 2028.”

A bond election would follow the rejection of a maintenance and operations property tax hike by 63% of city voters in November. In the wake of the defeat, Austin officials took steps to better manage its finances, including pursuing a citywide performance and efficiency audit of city operations.

The city, which last held a successful GO bond election in 2022 for $350 million of debt for affordable housing, had $1.03 billion of unissued voter-approved GO bond authorization as of the Sept. 30 end of fiscal 2025. Last year, Austin sold $796 million of GO bonds and certificates of obligation in a deal rated triple-A with stable outlooks by S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings.

On Thursday, the city council signed off on a $34.5 million wrongful prosecution and conviction settlement with four individuals to be financed through the sale of non-voter-approved GO bonds. 

Advertisement

The council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds on May 21 for a $1.6 billion project to replace the city’s now-demolished convention center with a facility that will increase rentable event space to 620,000 square feet from 365,000 square feet.

Construction site for Austin convention center project
Construction site for Austin’s convention center project, shown in March. The city council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds for a bigger convention center.

Rich Saskal

The bonds are backed with revenue from certain city hotel occupancy taxes and incremental state tax revenue generated within a project finance zone the city established in 2024. Amounts and timings for issuing the debt are being determined, according to the city, which filed a petition with a Travis County District Court for an expedited validation of the bonds. 

An ordinance approved in October to issue up to an initial $650 million of bonds for the project was rescinded by the council.

The city also plans to refund hotel occupancy tax-backed debt issued for the prior convention center in order to pledge a 4.5% hotel tax for the upcoming bonds. 

Advertisement

“The refunding bonds are a separate, but related item to the expansion bonds and will only be secured by 2% venue HOT,” city documents said. “The 2% venue HOT will not be pledged to the expansion bonds and will cease to be collected upon final maturity or early payoff of (the refunding bonds).” 

A petition drive that would have delayed the project fell 494 signatures short of a requirement for 20,000 valid signatures of registered voters, Austin City Clerk Erika Brady determined in November.

Petition backers are appealing a district court’s refusal to force validation in state appellate court after the Texas Supreme Court dismissed their petition for a writ of mandamus, according to attorneys.

The petition drive by Austin United PAC and others sought a ballot measure to stop the demolition and reconstruction of the convention center for seven years — or until the project was approved by voters — and prioritize city funding for local live music, arts, cultural, and outdoor tourism. 

The Austin City Council also approved as much as $1 billion of water and wastewater system revenue bonds last month for the Walnut Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and enhancement project. The bonds will be used to obtain a direct low-interest loan from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act program. 

Advertisement

Other financing sources for the $1.5 billion project are $59 million from the Texas Water Development Board Clean Water State Revolving Fund program and funding from Austin Water.

A groundbreaking for the project, which is aimed at improving treatment processes and protecting the Colorado River, was held in April.

The plant, which serves more than 50% of Austin and operates at a treatment capacity of 75 million gallons per day, will have its capacity increased to 100 MGD, helping meet future demand and requirements set by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for Austin’s projected growth of 1.5 million by 2040, according to a city statement.

A legal logjam over a light rail system eased May 22 when the Texas Supreme Court finally ruled on a procedural issue related to an initial $150 million of bonds for the project. The high court ordered a Travis County Court judge to decide whether the bonds’ issuer, the Austin Transit Partnership, a nonprofit corporation created by the city and Capital Metro Transportation Authority, has standing to seek court validation for the debt.

City taxpayers who filed a lawsuit in 2023, along with the Texas Attorney General’s Office have been challenging the legality of the bonds, which would be paid off with a portion of Austin’s operation and maintenance property taxes voters approved in November 2020 for what was then billed as a 27-mile, 31-station light-rail project estimated to cost $7.1 billion.

Advertisement

Escalating costs led ATP to downsize Project Connect to an initial less than 10-mile, 15-station system with a similar price tag. The completion of a federal environmental review in January allowed the project to continue a process to seek billions of dollars in federal grants and loans.

ATP said Project Connect is moving forward with construction scheduled to begin next year.  

“We are confident in our case and look forward to our day in court,” ATP said in a statement. “The pending litigation has not slowed our progress advancing Austin light rail, which has hit major milestones in the federal funding process, design, and pre-construction work this year.” 

Bill Aleshire, an attorney who filed the taxpayers’ lawsuit, cautioned that several issues remain before the court, including the legality of the downsized project and the ability to pay off bonds with property tax revenue that is supposed to be used for operations. 

“Their federal funding is uncertain, their ability to issue bonds is uncertain, and they just stubbornly will not listen to us and say it’s time to pause Project Connect and rethink it, that maybe rail isn’t the best way to go at this time and maybe we can’t afford it at this time,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending