Business
Plastic Spoons, Umbrellas, Violins: A Guide to What Americans Buy From China
Tariffs are up. Tariffs are down. Shipping is frozen. Shipping is back on.
In the past several weeks, Chinese imports to the U.S. have been on a seesaw, leaving Americans uncertain how tariffs will affect their lives.
It’s impossible to say what tariffs will do to the price or availability of any particular item, although even the Trump administration’s current level of 30 percent tariffs — on top of previous levies — will certainly make many things more expensive.
But thanks to detailed trade data, we know what Americans buy from China, and how much of it, and thus what might be most sensitive to future swings in trade status.
Here are several ways of understanding what’s on those container ships, based on 2024 data from the U.S. International Trade Commission.
First, the products where the greatest share of our imports are Chinese imports:
Goods Americans import almost exclusively from China
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaImports
from China
in millions
1
Baby carriages
97%
$380
2
Artificial plants
96%
$991
3
Umbrellas
96%
$491
4
Filing cabinets
96%
$88
5
Vacuum flasks
96%
$1,634
6
Fireworks
95%
$465
7
Children’s picture books
93%
$505
8
Portable lighting
91%
$901
9
Combs
91%
$367
10
Travel kits
90%
$42
This list is the simplest way to think about which Chinese goods the U.S. relies on most. But percentages aren’t everything. Americans buy so much from China that even goods with smaller imported shares from there could still be significantly affected by tariffs.
Chinese goods that Americans spend the most on
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaImports
from China
in millions
1
Telephones
42%
$50,085
2
Computers
26%
$35,473
3
Electric batteries
58%
$17,022
4
Other toys
76%
$13,463
5
Motor vehicles; parts and accessories
11%
$9,059
6
Video and card games
78%
$7,083
7
Video displays
33%
$6,770
8
Electric heaters
55%
$6,607
9
Seats
26%
$6,582
10
Packaged medications
6%
$6,146
This list skews slightly toward more expensive goods that the average American purchases infrequently, particularly electronics. But the International Trade Commission also tracks how many of each good the U.S. imports.
Chinese goods with huge U.S. import quantities
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaItems imported
from China
in millions
1
Plastic housewares
79%
67,895
2
Other plastic products
45%
19,158
3
Plastic lids
22%
13,688
4
Electrical capacitors
11%
12,125
5
Semiconductor devices
3%
11,368
6
Electrical resistors
11%
9,276
7
Other toys
76%
6,390
8
Other cloth articles
64%
5,466
9
Shaped paper
38%
3,895
10
Low-voltage protection equipment
15%
3,626
In that list, you can see Americans’ well-documented reliance on China for plastic products.
Many of America’s major imports from China are consumer goods: things you buy for yourself, like clothes, housewares or entertainment. Drill down into those categories and specific products stand out.
For example, American wardrobes are somewhat dependent on China: about a fifth of U.S. clothing imports. But a majority of neckties and gloves and pantyhose are imported from China.
Clothing
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaImports
from China
in millions
1
Hosiery
58%
$149
2
Neckties
57%
$52
3
Gloves
53%
$724
4
Handkerchiefs
53%
$13
5
Women’s and girls’ bathrobes
50%
$217
The U.S. is more reliant on China for things made with polyester and nylon (like pantyhose) than for those made with cotton.
Athletes, especially racket-sport players, are also dependent on China:
Sporting goods
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaImports
from China
in millions
1
Badminton or similar rackets
94%
$64
2
Equipment for table tennis
81%
$34
3
Lawn-tennis rackets
70%
$41
4
Gym and athletic equipment
69%
$1,652
5
Other sports and pool equipment
64%
$1,345
There are also consumer-goods categories whose “Made in China” status may not be as well known. For example, the U.S. gets a lot of its imported string instruments — such as violins and cellos — from China.
Musical instruments
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaImports
from China
in millions
1
String musical instruments played with a bow
83%
$31
2
Brass-wind instruments
44%
$49
3
Percussion musical instruments
36%
$42
4
Wind musical instruments except brass
27%
$48
5
Grand and upright pianos
4%
$4.8
The Japanese company Yamaha manufactures some of its instruments in China, including trumpets and drums.
The U.S. also relies on China for many of its vitamins …
Vitamin derivatives
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaImports
from China
in millions
1
Vitamin B6
90%
$32
2
Vitamin B1
88%
$43
3
Vitamin B12
85%
$59
4
Vitamin C
73%
$139
5
Vitamin B3 and B5
72%
$35
… and eels. (China has a robust eel farming industry.)
Fish
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaImports
from China
in millions
1
Preserved eel
95%
$38
2
Frozen cod-like fish
91%
$8.5
3
Frozen tilapia fillets
75%
$308
4
Dried, salted and brined cod-like fish fillets
69%
$37
5
Frozen flatfish fillets
65%
$58
Then there are the goods that the U.S. imports primarily to put inside other things, like car parts.
Car parts
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaImports
from China
in millions
1
Vehicle windshields and window parts
32%
$358
2
Motor vehicle wheels and accessories
31%
$1,338
3
Vehicle parts: brakes, servo-brake and parts
25%
$1,697
4
Bumpers and parts for motor vehicles
5%
$79
5
Seat belts for motor vehicles
4%
$11
The U.S. relies heavily on Chinese imports to build electric vehicles in particular: Some 70 percent of its imported lithium-ion batteries are from China.
Even batteries made in the U.S. often rely on raw materials from China, particularly graphite. (China tightened its export controls on graphite at the end of last year, so this year’s numbers could end up looking very different.)
Critical minerals used in E.V. batteries
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaImports
from China
in millions
1
Graphite and artificial graphite
62%
$376
2
Manganese ores, oxides and articles
37%
$86
3
Cobalt ores, oxides, hydroxides and articles
2%
$9.8
4
Nickel ores, oxides, hydroxides, sulphates and raw nickel
2%
$30
5
Lithium oxide, hydroxide and carbonate
1%
$2.6
Mr. Trump’s newest tariffs are not the only levies imposed on Chinese goods, and there’s a complicated interplay of which tariffs apply to which products. Some goods that a lot of Americans buy received exemptions from the latest tariffs (though perhaps not future ones), including one item the U.S. imports almost exclusively from China: children’s books.
Select exempted goods
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaImports
from China
in millions
1
Children’s picture, drawing or coloring books
93%
$505
2
Smartphones
73%
$40,675
3
Portable computers
66%
$32,169
That’s a window into what Americans buy from China. But for some imports, the U.S. doesn’t rely on China. It’s a list that includes large vehicles, precious metals and tomatoes, all of which America imports largely from other countries.
Goods that the U.S. imports the least from China
ITEM
Total imports
in millions
1
Delivery trucks
$47,524
2
Other precious metal products
$21,231
3
Planes, helicopters, and/or spacecraft
$18,309
4
Diamonds
$15,938
5
Raw aluminum
$10,113
6
Refined copper
$8,627
7
Platinum
$6,973
8
Wine
$6,697
9
Other fruits
$5,923
10
Silver
$5,088
It’s also worth noting what America exports to China. Though the U.S. sends fewer goods to China than it receives, these could still be affected in a trade war. (China has been instituting its own exemptions, which are broader than those of the U.S.)
Goods that the U.S. exports the most to China
ITEM
Exports
to China
in millions
1
Soybeans
$12,761
2
Civilian aircraft
$11,522
3
Integrated circuits
$8,716
4
Vaccines, blood, antisera, toxins and cultures
$6,680
5
Petroleum gas
$6,187
6
Crude petroleum
$6,160
7
Cars
$4,931
8
Machines used to manufacture semiconductor devices, electronic integrated circuits or flat panel displays
$4,170
9
Medical instruments
$3,460
10
Scrap copper
$2,795
To let you take a closer look at what America does and doesn’t import from China, we’ve included a searchable list below of all goods for which the U.S. imported at least $20 million (from any country) in 2024, excluding America’s major exports.
ITEM
Pct. from
ChinaImports
from China
in millions
1
Baby carriages
97%
$380
2
Artificial plants
96%
$991
3
Umbrellas
96%
$491
4
Filing cabinets
96%
$88
5
Vacuum flasks
96%
$1,634
6
Fireworks
95%
$465
7
Children’s picture books
93%
$505
8
Portable lighting
91%
$901
9
Combs
91%
$367
10
Travel kits
90%
$42
11
Chalkboards
90%
$124
12
Party decorations
89%
$4,699
13
Umbrella and walking stick accessories
85%
$71
14
Other footwear
84%
$972
15
Blankets
82%
$1,398
16
Other cutlery
82%
$140
17
Iron housewares
81%
$3,155
18
Bells and other metal ornaments
81%
$911
19
Ceramic tableware
80%
$835
20
Other domestic electric housewares
80%
$2,696
21
Other musical instruments
80%
$22
22
Other clocks
80%
$110
23
Scissors
79%
$123
24
Plastic housewares
79%
$6,079
25
Video and card games
78%
$7,083
26
Other toys
76%
$13,463
27
Cooking hand tools
74%
$106
28
Wood frames
74%
$149
29
Sound recording equipment
72%
$812
30
Aluminum housewares
72%
$1,143
31
Postcards
72%
$273
32
Glycosides
71%
$215
33
Manganese
71%
$85
34
Electric filament
70%
$1,882
35
Scent sprays
70%
$173
36
Cutlery sets
69%
$309
37
Image projectors
68%
$38
38
Graphite
68%
$96
39
Wood ornaments
68%
$394
40
Phosphoric esters and salts
67%
$82
41
Glass bricks
66%
$99
42
Wheelchairs
66%
$273
43
Pearl products
65%
$605
44
Walking sticks
65%
$28
45
Imitation jewelry
65%
$602
46
Brooms
64%
$1,241
47
Other cloth articles
64%
$3,589
48
Fake hair
64%
$879
49
Ornamental ceramics
63%
$328
50
Wood kitchenware
63%
$267
51
Other knit clothing accessories
63%
$186
52
Awnings, tents, and sails
62%
$546
53
Iron sewing needles
62%
$23
54
Iron stovetops
62%
$2,278
55
Pastes and waxes
62%
$200
56
Safes
62%
$212
57
Calendars
61%
$73
58
Interior decorative glassware
60%
$806
59
Artificial graphite
60%
$280
60
Knives
59%
$463
61
Fishing and hunting equipment
59%
$512
62
Watch straps
58%
$121
63
Electric batteries
58%
$17,022
64
Molybdenum
58%
$109
65
Other headwear
57%
$328
66
Neck ties
57%
$52
67
Sports equipment
56%
$4,283
68
Knit gloves
56%
$602
69
Knit socks and hosiery
55%
$1,320
70
Electric heaters
55%
$6,607
71
Hats
55%
$62
72
Mattresses
54%
$2,200
73
Processed mica
54%
$26
74
Other non-knit clothing accessories
54%
$111
75
Porcelain tableware
54%
$179
76
Rubber footwear
54%
$3,440
77
Bedspreads
54%
$422
78
Handkerchiefs
53%
$13
79
Woven fabrics
52%
$120
80
Bladed weapons and accessories
52%
$12
81
Other articles of twine and rope
51%
$76
82
Hair trimmers
51%
$343
83
Gimp yarn
51%
$41
84
Inedible fats and oils
50%
$1,177
85
Cameras
49%
$229
86
Artistry paints
48%
$63
87
Eyewear frames
47%
$595
88
Bathroom ceramics
46%
$725
89
Mannequins
46%
$32
90
Window dressings
46%
$564
91
Magnesium carbonate
46%
$97
92
Other carpets
45%
$132
93
Plastic wash basins
45%
$273
94
Smoking pipes
45%
$12
95
Electromagnets
45%
$487
96
Other zinc products
44%
$125
97
Pulley systems
44%
$653
98
Waterproof footwear
44%
$65
99
Non-knit gloves
43%
$122
100
Carbides
42%
$147
101
Telephones
42%
$50,085
102
Tool sets
42%
$38
103
Bicycles, delivery tricycles, other cycles
42%
$417
104
Medical furniture
42%
$537
105
Locust beans, seaweed, sugar beet, cane
41%
$100
106
Microphones and headphones
41%
$5,365
107
Iron anchors
41%
$18
108
Monopods, bipods, tripods and similar articles
41%
$24
109
Eyewear
40%
$1,023
110
Scarves
40%
$124
111
Other hand tools
39%
$570
112
Electric musical instruments
39%
$232
113
Rubber stamps
39%
$14
114
Iron toiletry
38%
$238
115
Scales
38%
$329
116
Iron oxides and hydroxides
38%
$82
117
Felt or coated fabric garments
38%
$825
118
Metal office supplies
38%
$57
119
Other knit garments
37%
$550
120
Motor-working tools
37%
$2,742
121
Light fixtures
36%
$3,344
122
Garments of impregnated fabric
36%
$67
123
Hand tools
36%
$169
124
Percussion
36%
$42
125
Pens
35%
$393
126
Textile footwear
35%
$2,760
127
Saddlery
35%
$198
128
Spring, air, and gas guns
35%
$73
129
Carboxyimide compounds
35%
$102
130
Other wood articles
35%
$597
131
Electrical insulators
34%
$135
132
Knit women’s undergarments
34%
$1,100
133
House linens
34%
$1,989
134
Toilet paper
34%
$678
135
Wind instruments
34%
$97
136
Metal mountings
34%
$2,945
137
Plastic floor coverings
34%
$1,419
138
Knit active wear
33%
$226
139
Garden tools
33%
$136
140
Titanium oxides
33%
$20
141
Video displays
33%
$6,770
142
Bi-wheel vehicle parts
33%
$519
143
Video recording equipment
33%
$179
144
Glass beads
32%
$45
145
Therapeutic appliances
32%
$2,033
146
Safety glass
31%
$416
147
Pencils and crayons
31%
$99
148
Iron chains
31%
$216
149
Knitted hats
31%
$654
150
Non-knit women’s coats
29%
$562
151
Printed circuit boards
29%
$747
152
Iron cloth
29%
$168
153
Vacuum cleaners
29%
$896
154
Other cast iron products
29%
$160
155
Sound recordings
29%
$448
156
Ketones and quinones
28%
$278
157
Paper notebooks
28%
$269
158
Ornamental trimmings
28%
$11
159
Rubber inner tubes
28%
$21
160
Non-knit men’s coats
28%
$547
161
Wrenches
27%
$227
162
Other women’s undergarments
27%
$640
163
Vending machines
27%
$70
164
Embroidery
27%
$29
165
Labels
26%
$11
166
Other metals
26%
$182
167
Seats
26%
$6,582
168
Oxygen heterocyclic compounds
26%
$432
169
Knit men’s undergarments
26%
$427
170
Chromium oxides and hydroxides
26%
$6.8
171
Computers
26%
$35,473
172
Copper housewares
26%
$25
173
Nucleic acids
25%
$880
174
Basketwork
24%
$140
175
Boat propellers
24%
$149
176
Vegetable and mineral carvings
24%
$96
177
Knit women’s coats
24%
$199
178
Twine, cordage or rope; knotted netting, fishing nets and other nets, of textile materials
24%
$13
179
Time switches
24%
$15
180
Nitrogen heterocyclic compounds
24%
$1,167
181
Oxygen amino compounds
24%
$425
182
Motorcycles and cycles
23%
$907
183
Calculators
23%
$260
184
Non-knit active wear
23%
$536
185
Padlocks
23%
$662
186
Wool grease
23%
$5.8
187
Wallpaper
23%
$27
188
Trunks and cases
23%
$2,613
189
Iron nails
23%
$220
190
Aluminum ore
22%
$35
191
Air pumps
22%
$3,494
192
Coated textile fabric
22%
$23
193
Knit babies’ garments
22%
$374
194
Carboxyamide compounds
22%
$249
195
Household washing machines
22%
$502
196
Non-knit women’s undergarments
22%
$106
197
Other furniture
22%
$5,718
198
Woodworking machines
21%
$297
199
Worked slate
21%
$9.8
200
Vegetable saps
21%
$348
201
Non-knit women’s suits
21%
$2,160
202
Woven fabric of synthetic staple fibers
21%
$8.1
203
Commodities not elsewhere specified
21%
$5,136
204
Rubber apparel
21%
$558
205
Balances
21%
$25
206
Leather footwear
21%
$2,404
207
Glass bottles
21%
$343
208
Knit women’s suits
21%
$1,106
209
Plastic building materials
21%
$578
210
Barium sulphate
20%
$40
211
Knit sweaters
20%
$2,570
212
Refrigerators
19%
$2,585
213
Air conditioners
19%
$2,876
214
Wooden tool handles
19%
$9.2
215
Sanitary towels (pads)
19%
$341
216
Vegetable alkaloids
19%
$86
217
Navigation equipment
18%
$799
218
Carboxylic acids
18%
$267
219
Decals
18%
$20
220
Stone working machines
18%
$67
221
Non-knit women’s shirts
18%
$326
222
Non-knit babies’ garments
18%
$58
223
Aluminum foil
18%
$243
224
Watch cases and parts
18%
$4.6
225
Knit men’s coats
17%
$142
226
Copper pipe fittings
17%
$178
227
Gum coated textile fabric
17%
$14
228
Broadcasting equipment
17%
$1,924
229
Refractory bricks
17%
$47
230
Warp knit fabrics
16%
$55
231
Inhalable tobacco/nicotine products
16%
$93
232
Stranded iron wire
16%
$155
233
Metal molds
16%
$359
234
Hydrazine or hydroxylamine derivatives
16%
$23
235
Pearls
15%
$12
236
Spices
15%
$62
237
Onions
15%
$126
238
Building stone
14%
$395
239
Vegetable waxes and beeswax
14%
$9.4
240
Hand saws
14%
$126
241
Packing bags
14%
$98
242
Agglomerated cork
14%
$17
243
Audio alarms
14%
$519
244
Hot-rolled stainless steel bars
14%
$20
245
Book-binding machines
14%
$29
246
Silk fabrics
14%
$5.3
247
Metal stoppers
13%
$138
248
Letter stock
13%
$28
249
Conveyor belt textiles
13%
$15
250
Rolling machines
13%
$46
251
Electrical ignitions
13%
$590
252
Retail artificial filament yarn
13%
$5.3
253
Rubber belting
13%
$105
254
Other leather articles
13%
$19
255
Sewing machines
13%
$53
256
Other vegetable oils
13%
$31
257
Textile wall coverings
13%
$4.7
258
Tufted carpets
13%
$138
259
Casting machines
13%
$60
260
Fish fillets
13%
$951
261
Mirrors and lenses
13%
$195
262
Diazo, azo or azoxy compounds
13%
$6.2
263
Electric motors
12%
$1,603
264
Furskin apparel
12%
$12
265
Industrial printers
12%
$1,787
266
Iron wire
12%
$75
267
Electrical transformers
12%
$3,539
268
Milling stones
12%
$68
269
Other office machines
12%
$116
270
Granulated slag
12%
$26
271
Other heating machinery
12%
$1,066
272
Other clocks and watches
12%
$6.5
273
Sulfonamides
12%
$134
274
Dried/salted/smoked/brined fish
12%
$49
275
Leather apparel
12%
$164
276
Non-knit men’s undergarments
12%
$26
277
Polycarboxylic acids
12%
$181
278
Electrical parts
11%
$35
279
Antimony
11%
$11
280
Engine parts
11%
$1,228
281
Insulated wire
11%
$3,448
282
Rubber pipes
11%
$253
283
Aluminum structures
11%
$307
284
Electrical resistors
11%
$109
285
Non-knit men’s suits
11%
$884
286
Other electrical machinery
11%
$1,798
287
Electrical capacitors
11%
$200
288
Motor vehicles; parts and accessories
11%
$9,059
289
Worked ivory and bone
11%
$4.3
290
Hard rubber
11%
$3.3
291
Other processed fruits and nuts
11%
$449
292
Microscopes
11%
$60
293
Radio receivers
11%
$404
294
Unprocessed artificial staple fibers
11%
$26
295
Electric motor parts
11%
$368
296
Knit men’s suits
10%
$234
297
Other processed vegetables
10%
$202
298
Insulating glass
10%
$37
299
Other meat
10%
$6.6
300
Retail artificial staple fibers yarn
10%
$15
301
Tea
10%
$55
302
Razor blades
10%
$67
303
Iron structures
10%
$854
304
Non-knit men’s shirts
10%
$261
305
Non-mechanical removal machinery
10%
$90
306
Other slag and ash
10%
$3.6
307
Pepper
9%
$104
308
Wood fiberboard
9%
$120
309
Machinery having individual functions
9%
$1,265
310
Papermaking machines
9%
$67
311
Metalworking machines
9%
$30
312
Retail cotton yarn
9%
$4.5
313
Dried fruits
9%
$32
314
Office machine parts
9%
$4,499
315
Knit t-shirts
9%
$572
316
Knitting machines
9%
$11
317
Light pure woven cotton
9%
$32
318
Steel wire
9%
$20
319
Fork-lifts
8%
$691
320
Knit women’s shirts
8%
$167
321
Hand-woven rugs
8%
$130
322
Stone processing machines
8%
$178
323
Gelatin
8%
$24
324
Pumice
8%
$4.6
325
Drilling machines
8%
$30
326
Light mixed woven cotton
8%
$4.1
327
Electrical lighting and signaling equipment
8%
$532
328
Pharmaceutical rubber products
8%
$6.3
329
Cement articles
8%
$198
330
Jute woven fabric
8%
$3.0
331
Other live plants, cuttings and slips;
mushroom spawn8%
$70
332
Iron pipes
7%
$224
333
Other agricultural machinery
7%
$95
334
Washing and bottling machines
7%
$431
335
Sugar preserved foods
7%
$2.5
336
Knit men’s shirts
7%
$153
337
Leather machinery
7%
$2.3
338
Feldspar
7%
$18
339
Rubberworking machinery
7%
$228
340
Metal-rolling mills
7%
$95
341
Lifting machinery
7%
$545
342
Electrical control boards
7%
$1,252
343
Blown glass
6%
$4.8
344
Mollusks
6%
$78
345
Flax woven fabric
6%
$7.9
346
Magnesium
6%
$22
347
Used rubber tires
6%
$29
348
Central heating boilers
6%
$29
349
Pasta
6%
$109
350
Textile processing machines
6%
$117
351
Traffic signals
6%
$28
352
Glass with edge workings
6%
$14
353
Other vegetable products
6%
$10
354
Packaged medications
6%
$6,146
355
Plant foliage
6%
$15
356
Quilted textiles
6%
$1.5
357
Tobacco processing machines
6%
$5.4
358
Wood carpentry
6%
$188
359
Frozen vegetables
6%
$80
360
Candles
6%
$62
361
Perfume plants
6%
$29
362
Processed fish
6%
$116
363
Scrap nickel
6%
$22
364
Yeast
6%
$31
365
Tool plates
5%
$57
366
Copper plating
5%
$54
367
Other paper machinery
5%
$75
368
Polyamide fabric
5%
$16
369
Other non-metal removal machinery
5%
$14
370
Large construction vehicles
5%
$529
371
Fruit juice
5%
$189
372
Other edible animal products
5%
$1.1
373
Plywood
5%
$138
374
Processed crustaceans
5%
$148
375
Unprocessed synthetic staple fibers
5%
$36
376
Confectionery sugar
5%
$149
377
Other animals
5%
$15
378
Radioactive chemicals
5%
$324
379
Metal-clad products
5%
$2.7
380
Nitrites and nitrates
5%
$6.4
381
Antiques
4%
$36
382
Coffee and tea extracts
4%
$56
383
Pianos
4%
$4.5
384
Reclaimed rubber
4%
$4.5
385
Metal finishing machines
4%
$22
386
Tapioca
4%
$2.3
387
Forging machines
4%
$70
388
Insect resins
4%
$5.4
389
Rubber tires
4%
$760
390
Photographic plates
4%
$28
391
Textile scraps
4%
$4.5
392
Other oily seeds
4%
$16
393
Processed mushrooms
4%
$4.9
394
Cranes
4%
$66
395
Tungsten ore
3%
$1.6
396
Animal extracts
3%
$0.78
397
Base metal watches
3%
$160
398
Paper pulp filter blocks
3%
$0.65
399
Felt machinery
3%
$3.4
400
Revolution counters
3%
$49
401
Curbstones
3%
$2.7
402
Other small iron pipes
3%
$111
403
Salt
3%
$15
404
Jewelry
3%
$411
405
Blank audio media
3%
$504
406
Pickled foods
3%
$17
407
Cobalt oxides and hydroxides
3%
$0.90
408
Other pure vegetable oils
3%
$27
409
Semiconductor devices
3%
$557
410
Aircraft parts for spacecraft, UAVs, and ground equipment
2%
$384
411
Iron blocks
2%
$26
412
Starches
2%
$11
413
Carded wool or animal hair fabric
2%
$0.58
414
Collector’s items
2%
$7.3
415
Utility meters
2%
$41
416
Densified wood
2%
$0.65
417
Linoleum
2%
$0.69
418
Copper pipes
2%
$23
419
Photographic paper
2%
$0.46
420
Metal lathes
2%
$19
421
Vegetable parchment
2%
$7.5
422
Coated flat-rolled iron
2%
$102
423
Spice seeds
2%
$2.2
424
Cars
2%
$3,588
425
Gas turbines
2%
$497
426
Gravel and crushed stone
2%
$4.1
427
Knotted carpets
2%
$5.7
428
Non-retail artificial staple fibers yarn
2%
$0.32
429
Synthetic reconstructed jewelry stones
2%
$17
430
Cigarette paper
1%
$3.9
431
Chlorates and perchlorates
1%
$2.4
432
Ground nut oil
1%
$0.94
433
Shaped wood
1%
$19
434
Cloves
1%
$0.35
435
Retail wool or animal hair yarn
1%
$0.65
436
Dolomite
1%
$0.52
437
Ferroalloys
1%
$28
438
Hydrochloric acid
1%
$0.77
439
Combed wool or animal hair fabric
1%
$0.59
440
Leather further prepared after tanning or crusting of animals (other than ovine)
1%
$0.30
441
Wood charcoal
1%
$1.1
442
Aquatic invertebrates, other than crustaceans and mollusks
0.9%
$0.50
443
Non-retail combed wool yarn
0.9%
$0.42
444
Other large iron pipes
0.9%
$6.8
445
Baked goods
0.8%
$88
446
Coin
0.8%
$22
447
Leather of other animals
0.8%
$2.7
448
Nutmeg, mace and cardamons
0.8%
$0.37
449
Other firearms
0.8%
$5.4
450
Perfumes
0.8%
$45
451
Preserved vegetables
0.8%
$0.38
452
Watch movements
0.8%
$0.24
453
Tissue
0.7%
$4.1
454
Aluminum wire
0.6%
$5.7
455
Cinnamon
0.6%
$0.96
456
Raw iron bars
0.6%
$5.0
457
Vaccines, blood, antisera, toxins and cultures
0.6%
$618
458
Hard liquor
0.5%
$59
459
Jams
0.5%
$3.2
460
Sawn wood
0.5%
$38
461
Stranded aluminum wire
0.5%
$2.0
462
Vehicle bodies for the motor vehicles
0.5%
$3.8
463
Biodiesel and mixtures thereof
0.4%
$6.9
464
Coconut and other vegetable fibers
0.4%
$0.19
465
Live fish
0.4%
$0.34
466
Natural cork articles
0.4%
$0.66
467
Chocolate
0.3%
$15
468
Frozen fruits and nuts
0.3%
$3.8
469
Hat forms
0.3%
$0.14
470
Metalworking transfer machines
0.3%
$3.9
471
Particle board
0.3%
$7.3
472
Pitch coke
0.3%
$0.27
473
Tractors
0.3%
$48
474
Zinc oxide and peroxide
0.3%
$0.94
475
Citrus
0.2%
$3.2
476
Coffee
0.2%
$22
477
Crustaceans
0.2%
$13
478
Cut flowers
0.2%
$3.8
479
Gypsum
0.2%
$0.40
480
Halogens
0.2%
$0.67
481
Linseed
0.2%
$0.25
482
Motor vehicle chassis fitted with engine
0.2%
$0.39
483
Other fermented beverages
0.2%
$0.70
484
Other vegetables
0.2%
$11
485
Precious stones
0.2%
$4.7
486
Processed cereals
0.2%
$0.95
487
Raw lead
0.2%
$1.5
488
Seed oils
0.2%
$0.49
489
Semi-finished iron
0.2%
$5.6
490
Stainless steel ingots
0.2%
$1.1
491
Uncoated paper
0.2%
$3.7
492
Wheat flours
0.2%
$0.61
493
Wheat gluten
0.2%
$0.67
494
Aircraft launch gear
0.1%
$0.48
495
Bananas
0.1%
$1.7
496
Beer
0.1%
$3.9
497
Cereal flours
0.1%
$0.42
498
Chromium ore
0.1%
499
Cocoa powder
0.1%
$0.23
500
Nitrogenous fertilizers
0.1%
$2.3
501
Other vegetable residues
0.1%
$1.1
502
Precious metal watches
0.1%
$2.2
503
Raw sugar
0.1%
$2.5
504
Raw zinc
0.1%
$2.0
505
Sulphur
0.1%
$0.48
506
Tropical fruits
0.1%
$4.2
507
Unglazed ceramics
0.1%
$1.2
508
Water
0.1%
$0.67
509
Ammonia
510
Asphalt mixtures
511
Borax
512
Bovine
513
Bovine, sheep, and goat fat
514
Bulbs and roots
515
Butter
516
Calcium phosphates
517
Casein
518
Cement
$0.52
519
Cocoa beans
520
Cocoa butter
521
Cocoa paste
522
Coconut oil
$0.52
523
Coconuts, brazil nuts, and cashews
524
Cucumbers
525
Delivery trucks
$12
526
Diamonds
$0.93
527
Electricity
528
Grapes
$0.20
529
Handguns
530
Honey
531
Horses
532
Hot-rolled iron bars
$0.25
533
Iron reductions
534
Legumes
$0.13
535
Manganese ore
536
Melons
537
Molasses
538
Newsprint
539
Non-fillet fresh fish
$0.92
540
Oats
541
Olive oil
542
Other animal fats
543
Other fruits
$2.9
544
Other precious metal products
$2.9
545
Palm oil
546
Peat
547
Phosphatic fertilizers
548
Pig iron
549
Pigs
550
Planes, helicopters, and/or spacecraft
$0.14
551
Platinum
$0.32
552
Potassic fertilizers
$0.28
553
Pure olive oil
554
Rapeseed oil
$0.56
555
Raw aluminum
$2.7
556
Raw nickel
$0.48
557
Raw tin
$0.11
558
Refined copper
$2.3
559
Rolled tobacco
$0.49
560
Rubber
$0.40
561
Rye
562
Self-propelled rail transport
563
Semi chemical woodpulp
564
Sheep and goat meat
565
Silver
$0.48
566
Steel bars
567
Steel ingots
$0.16
568
Sulfite chemical woodpulp
569
Sulfuric acid
570
Titanium ore
571
Tomatoes
572
Uranium and thorium ore
573
Vanilla
574
Vermouth
575
Wine
$0.12
576
Zinc powder
About the data
We analyzed U.S. International Trade Commission data on goods imported for consumption in 2024. We used product descriptions from the Observatory of Economic Complexity to label the goods, and edited these descriptions lightly.
For the lists of major imports and exports, and the full searchable list, we grouped goods using the first four digits of their code in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, which lists categories of products. For more specific lists of goods within these categories, we looked at the first six digits of the product code.
We excluded goods that are widely produced in the U.S., using export data to remove goods where the U.S. exports at least 50 percent of what it imports by value. (We did not do this for the critical minerals or imports by quantity data.)
Business
California unemployment rises in September as forecast predicts slow jobs growth
California lost jobs for the fourth consecutive month in September — and it’s expected to add only 62,000 new jobs next year as high taxes drag on business formation, according to a report released Thursday.
The annual Chapman University economic forecast released Thursday found that the state’s job growth totaled just 2% from the second quarter of 2022 to the second quarter of this year, ranking it 48th among all states.
That matches California’s low ranking on the Tax Foundation’s 2024 State Business Tax Climate Index, which measures the rate of taxes and how they are assessed, according to the Gary Anderson Center for Economic Research report by the Orange, Calif., school.
The state also experienced a net population outflow of more than 1 million residents from 2021 to 2023, with the top five destinations being states with zero or very low state income taxes: Texas, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho and Florida, the report noted.
What’s more, the average adjusted gross income for those leaving California was $134,000 in 2022, while for those entering it was $113,000, according to the most recent IRS data on net income flows cited by the report.
“High relative state taxes not only drive out jobs, but they also drive out people,” said the report, which expects just a 0.3% increase in California jobs next year leading to the 62,000 net gain.
More unsettling, the report said, was a “sharp decline” in the number of companies and other advanced industry concerns established in California relative to other states, in such sectors as technology, software, aerospace and medical products.
California accounted for 17.5% of all such establishments in the fourth quarter of 2018, but that dropped to 14.9% in the first quarter of this year. Much of the competition came from low-tax states, the report said.
California saw the number of advanced industry establishments grow from 89,300 to 108,600 from 2018 through this year, but low-tax states saw a 52.2% growth rate from 164,000 to 249,600 establishments, it said.
Also on Thursday, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics released its monthly states jobs report, which had been delayed by the government shutdown. It, too, showed California had a weak labor market with the state losing 4,500 jobs for the month, edging up its unemployment rate from 5.5% to 5.6%, the highest in the nation aside from Washington, D.C.
The state has lost jobs since June as tech companies in the Bay Area and elsewhere shed employees and spend billions of dollars on developing artificial intelligence capabilities.
There have also been high-profile layoffs in Hollywood amid a drop-off in filming, runaway production to other states and countries, and industry consolidation, such as the bidding war being conducted over Warner Bros. Discovery. The latter is expected to bring even deeper cuts in Southern California’s cornerstone film and TV industry.
Michael Bernick, a former director of California’s Employment Development Department, said such industry trends are only partially to blame for the state’s poor job performance.
“The greater part of the explanation lies in the costs and liabilities of hiring in California — costs and especially liabilities that are higher than other states,” he said in an emailed statement.
Nationally, the Chapman report cited the Trump administration’s tariffs as a drag on the economy, noting they are greater than the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 thought to have exacerbated the Great Depression.
That act only increased tariffs on average by 13.5% to 20% and mainly on agricultural and manufactured products, while the Trump tariffs “cover most goods and affect all of our trading partners.”
As a consequence, the report projects that annual job growth next year will reach only 0.2%, which will curb GDP growth.
The report predicts the national economy will grow by 2% next year, slightly higher than this year’s 1.8% expected rate. Among the positive factors influencing the economy are AI investment and interest rates, while slowing growth — aside from tariffs and the jobs picture — is low demand for new housing.
The report cites lower rates of family formation, lower immigration rates and a declining birth rate contributing to the lower housing demand.
Business
Trump signs order to limit state AI regulations, with California in the crosshairs
The battle between California and the White House escalated as President Trump signed an executive order to block state laws regulating artificial intelligence.
The president’s power move to try to take over control of the regulation of the technology behind ChatGPT through an executive order Thursday was applauded by his allies in Silicon Valley, who have been warning that many layers of heavy-handed rules and regulations were holding them back and could put the U.S. behind in the battle to benefit most from AI.
The order directs the attorney general to create a task force to challenge some state AI laws. States with “onerous AI laws” could lose federal funding from a broadband deployment program and other grants, the order said.
The Trump administration said the order will help U.S. companies win the AI race against countries such as China by removing “cumbersome regulation.” It also pushes for a “minimally burdensome” national standard rather than a patchwork of laws across 50 states that the administration said makes compliance challenging, especially for startups.
“You have to have a central source of approval when they need approval. So things have to come to one source. They can’t go to California, New York and various other places,” Trump told reporters at the Oval Office on Thursday.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom pushed back against the order, stating it “advances corruption, not innovation.”
“They’re running a con. And every day, they push the limits to see how far they can take it,” Newsom said in a statement. “California is working on behalf of Americans by building the strongest innovation economy in the nation while implementing commonsense safeguards and leading the way forward.”
The dueling remarks between Newsom and Trump underscore how the tech industry’s influence over regulation has increased tensions between the federal government and state lawmakers trying to place more guardrails around AI.
While AI chatbots can help people quickly find answers to questions and generate text, code, and images, the increasing role the technology plays in people’s daily lives has also sparked greater anxiety about job displacement, equity, and mental health harms.
The order heavily impacts California, home to some of the world’s largest tech companies such as OpenAI, Google, Nvidia and Meta. It also jeopardizes the $1.8 billion in federal funding California has received to expand high-speed internet throughout the state.
Some analysts said Trump’s order is a win for tech giants that have vowed to invest trillions of dollars to build data centers and in research and development.
“We believe that more organizations are expected to head down the AI roadmap through strategic deployments over time, but this executive order takes away more questions around future AI buildouts and removes a major overhang moving forward,” said Wedbush analyst Dan Ives in a statement.
Facing lobbying from tech companies, Newsom has vetoed some AI legislation while signing others into law this year.
One new law requires platforms to display labels for minors that warn about social media’s mental health harms. Another aims to make AI developers more transparent about safety risks and offers more whistleblower protections.
He also signed a bill that requires chatbot operators to have procedures to prevent the production of suicide or self-harm content, though child safety groups removed support for that legislation because they said the tech industry successfully pushed for changes that weakened protections.
States and consumer advocacy groups are expected to legally challenge Trump’s order.
“Trump is not our king, and he cannot simply wave a pen to unilaterally invalidate state law,” state Sen. Steve Padilla (D-Chula Vista), who introduced the chatbot safety legislation that Newsom signed into law, said in a statement.
In addition to California, three other states — Colorado, Texas and Utah — have passed laws that set some rules for AI across the private sector, according to the International Assn. of Privacy Professionals. Those laws include limiting the collection of certain personal information and requiring more transparency from companies.
The more ambitious AI regulation proposals from states require private companies to provide transparency and assess the possible risks of discrimination from their AI programs. Many have regulated parts of AI: barring the use of deepfakes in elections and to create nonconsensual porn, for example, or putting rules in place around the government’s own use of AI.
The order drew both praise and criticism from the tech industry.
Collin McCune, the head of government affairs at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, said on social media site X that the executive order is an “incredibly important first step.”
“But the vacuum for federal AI legislation remains,” he wrote. “Congress needs to come together to create a clear set of rules that protect the millions of Americans using AI and the Little Tech builders driving it forward.”
Omidyar Network Chief Executive Mike Kubzansky said in a statement that he is aware of the risks posed by poorly drafted rules, but the solution isn’t to preempt state and local laws.
“Americans are rightly concerned about AI’s impact on kids, jobs, and the costs imposed on consumers and communities by the rapid development of data centers,” he said. “Ignoring these issues through a blanket moratorium is an abdication of what elected officials owe their constituents — which is why we strongly oppose the Administration’s recent executive action.”
Investors seemed unimpressed by the possible boost the sector could get from the White House.
The stock market fell sharply on Friday, led by AI shares.
Bloomberg and the Associated Press contributed to this report.
Business
California, other states sue Trump administration over $100,000 fee for H-1B visas
California and a coalition of other states are suing the Trump administration over a policy charging employers $100,000 for each new H-1B visa they request for foreign employees to work in the U.S. — calling it a threat not only to major industry but also to public education and healthcare services.
“As the world’s fourth largest economy, California knows that when skilled talent from around the world joins our workforce, it drives our state forward,” said California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, who announced the litigation Friday.
President Trump imposed the fee through a Sept. 19 proclamation, in which he said the H-1B visa program — designed to provide U.S. employers with skilled workers in science, technology, engineering, math and other advanced fields — has been “deliberately exploited to replace, rather than supplement, American workers with lower-paid, lower-skilled labor.”
Trump said the program also created a “national security threat by discouraging Americans from pursuing careers in science and technology, risking American leadership in these fields.”
Bonta said such claims are baseless, and that the imposition of such fees is unlawful because it runs counter to the intent of Congress in creating the program and exceeds the president’s authority. He said Congress has included significant safeguards to prevent abuses, and that the new fee structure undermines the program’s purpose.
“President Trump’s illegal $100,000 H-1B visa fee creates unnecessary — and illegal — financial burdens on California public employers and other providers of vital services, exacerbating labor shortages in key sectors,” Bonta said in a statement. “The Trump Administration thinks it can raise costs on a whim, but the law says otherwise.”
Taylor Rogers, a White House spokeswoman, said Friday that the fee was “a necessary, initial, incremental step towards necessary reforms” that were lawful and in line with the president’s promise to “put American workers first.”
Attorneys for the administration previously defended the fee in response to a separate lawsuit brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Assn. of American Universities, arguing earlier this month that the president has “extraordinarily broad discretion to suspend the entry of aliens whenever he finds their admission ‘detrimental to the interests of the United States,’” or to adopt “reasonable rules, regulations, and orders” related to their entry.
“The Supreme Court has repeatedly confirmed that this authority is ‘sweeping,’ subject only to the requirement that the President identify a class of aliens and articulate a facially legitimate reason for their exclusion,” the administration’s attorneys wrote.
They alleged that the H-1B program has been “ruthlessly and shamelessly exploited by bad actors,” and wrote that the plaintiffs were asking the court “to disregard the President’s inherent authority to restrict the entry of aliens into the country and override his judgment,” which they said it cannot legally do.
Trump’s announcement of the new fee alarmed many existing visa holders and badly rattled industries that are heavily reliant on such visas, including tech companies trying to compete for the world’s best talent in the global race to ramp up their AI capabilities. Thousands of companies in California have applied for H-1B visas this year, and tens of thousands have been granted to them.
Trump’s adoption of the fees is seen as part of his much broader effort to restrict immigration into the U.S. in nearly all its forms. However, he is far from alone in criticizing the H-1B program as a problematic pipeline.
Critics of the program have for years documented examples of employers using it to replace American workers with cheaper foreign workers, as Trump has suggested, and questioned whether the country truly has a shortage of certain types of workers — including tech workers.
There have also been allegations of employers, who control the visas, abusing workers and using the threat of deportation to deter complaints — among the reasons some on the political left have also been critical of the program.
“Not only is this program disastrous for American workers, it can be very harmful to guest workers as well, who are often locked into lower-paying jobs and can have their visas taken away from them by their corporate bosses if they complain about dangerous, unfair or illegal working conditions,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote in a Fox News opinion column in January.
In the Chamber of Commerce case, attorneys for the administration wrote that companies in the U.S. “have at times laid off thousands of American workers while simultaneously hiring thousands of H-1B workers,” sometimes even forcing the American workers “to train their H-1B replacements” before they leave.
They have done so, the attorneys wrote, even as unemployment among recent U.S. college graduates in STEM fields has increased.
“Employing H-1B workers in entry-level positions at discounted rates undercuts American worker wages and opportunities, and is antithetical to the purpose of the H-1B program, which is ‘to fill jobs for which highly skilled and educated American workers are unavailable,’” the administration’s attorneys wrote.
By contrast, the states’ lawsuit stresses the shortfalls in the American workforce in key industries, and defends the program by citing its existing limits. The legal action notes that employers must certify to the government that their hiring of visa workers will not negatively affect American wages or working conditions. Congress also has set a cap on the number of visa holders that any individual employer may hire.
Bonta’s office said educators account for the third-largest occupation group in the program, with nearly 30,000 educators with H-1B visas helping thousands of institutions fill a national teacher shortage that saw nearly three-quarters of U.S. school districts report difficulty filling positions in the 2024-2025 school year.
Schools, universities and colleges — largely public or nonprofit — cannot afford to pay $100,000 per visa, Bonta’s office said.
In addition, some 17,000 healthcare workers with H-1B visas — half of them physicians and surgeons — are helping to backfill a massive shortfall in trained medical staff in the U.S., including by working as doctors and nurses in low-income and rural neighborhoods, Bonta’s office said.
“In California, access to specialists and primary care providers in rural areas is already extremely limited and is projected to worsen as physicians retire and these communities struggle to attract new doctors,” it said. “As a result of the fee, these institutions will be forced to operate with inadequate staffing or divert funding away from other important programs to cover expenses.”
Bonta’s office said that prior to the imposition of the new fee, employers could expect to pay between $960 and $7,595 in “regulatory and statutory fees” per H-1B visa, based on the actual cost to the government of processing the request and document, as intended by Congress.
The Trump administration, Bonta’s office said, issued the new fee without going through legally required processes for collecting outside input first, and “without considering the full range of impacts — especially on the provision of the critical services by government and nonprofit entities.”
The arguments echo findings by a judge in a separate case years ago, after Trump tried to restrict many such visas in his first term. A judge in that case — brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Assn. of Manufacturers and others — found that Congress, not the president, had the authority to change the terms of the visas, and that the Trump administration had not evaluated the potential impacts of such a change before implementing it, as required by law.
The case became moot after President Biden decided not to renew the restrictions in 2021, a move which tech companies considered a win.
Joining in the lawsuit — California’s 49th against the Trump administration in the last year alone — are Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.
-
Alaska1 week agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Texas1 week agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
Washington6 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa1 week agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Miami, FL1 week agoUrban Meyer, Brady Quinn get in heated exchange during Alabama, Notre Dame, Miami CFP discussion
-
Iowa2 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World1 week ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans