Connect with us

New York

Luxury Condo Owners Accuse Builders of Hiding Dangerous Defects

Published

on

Luxury Condo Owners Accuse Builders of Hiding Dangerous Defects

The condo board at a troubled 1,400-foot luxury tower on New York City’s Billionaires’ Row is accusing developers of “deliberate and far-reaching fraud” by failing to disclose early cracks in the facade that it says could lead to dangerous structural issues.

Condo board members say that CIM Group and other developers of 432 Park Avenue failed to alert potential buyers and city inspectors about the severity of cracks in the signature white concrete facade that also “acts as a critical component of the building’s structural support,” according to a new lawsuit. The building opened in 2015.

The suit, filed late last month in State Supreme Court in Manhattan, also names as defendants an engineering firm and an architectural firm tied to the building’s construction. The board seeks damages exceeding $165 million, including “the diminution in value of the building and its units.”

The lawsuit details nearly 1,900 defects that have emerged in the facade of the building, one of several slender apartment buildings known as “supertalls” that dot the Manhattan skyline. Photos in the filing show vein-like cracks and chunks of concrete missing from the facade.

The suit accuses the defendants of knowing about the cracks early on but, worried about their bottom line, failing to adequately address them and instead covering up their effects.

Advertisement

“This matter extends beyond negligence into an alleged calculated scheme, driven by greed, that eroded trust,” Terrence Oved, a lawyer for the condo board, said in a statement.

A spokeswoman for CIM Group said the firm “vehemently” denied the claims and planned to move to dismiss the complaint. A lawyer for SLCE Architects, one of the defendants, also denied the allegations and noted plans to move to dismiss the complaint. The other defendants did not return requests for comment.

The Park Avenue building marked a turning point in luxury condo development in the city when it opened, luring wealthy part-time residents and investors who hid their identities behind shell companies. The tower drew the likes of Jennifer Lopez and Alex Rodriguez, who owned a $15.3 million, 4,000-square-foot apartment for a year, and a Saudi retail and real-estate tycoon who bought a penthouse. The building had a projected value of over $3 billion.

The suit follows other legal action the condo board filed against developers in 2021 after The New York Times revealed simmering dissension among residents who complained of floods that did multimillion-dollar damage, trash chutes that sounded like garbage bombs, stuck elevators and swaying related to the building’s slender profile. That suit seeks $160 million in damages and is pending in state court.

It’s been a tough stretch for New York’s tall, luxury towers.

Advertisement

Construction on 1 Seaport in the South Street Seaport neighborhood in Manhattan has been stopped in the wake of lawsuits after the tower was found to be leaning. And in Brooklyn, only a handful of units have been sold in the Brooklyn Tower, the borough’s first supertall, which has been plagued with financial drama.

The most recent suit filed over 432 Park Avenue took shape as lawyers for the board pored through seven million pages of documents and about 100 days of depositions tied to the 2021 lawsuit.

In the new suit, lawyers for the board presented a detailed explanation of defects in the tower that emerged from the start.

Plans for the building called for a naturally white concrete facade, which posed a unique challenge for a slender tower of that height. The concrete had to be strong enough to withstand all the floors pressing down on one another and stiff enough to hold up against winds that would push against the building during storms.

Andreas Tselebidis, the designer of the concrete mix, said it was “the greatest challenge ever requested by a ready mix producer,” according to the suit.

Advertisement

Mr. Tselebidis did not respond to a request for comment.

Cracks emerged across vertical columns in every mock-up test over a six-month period, the suit said.

The firm of Rafael Viñoly, the star architect who led the design, had repeatedly voiced concerns about the cracking, according to the suit.

“It is difficult to know the impact of cracking in a fully loaded building,” the firm wrote in a field report on Dec. 17, 2012, which was cited in the lawsuit. “It is imperative that the concrete consultant review these conditions and advise.”

The next day, Silvian Marcus of WSP, the building’s structural engineer that is one of the defendants in the suit, also expressed concerns, writing to developers to “hold the pour” until they had a “valid” white concrete mix.

Advertisement

Mr. Viñoly died in 2023. Mr. Marcus did not return requests for comment.

The developers forged ahead, the suit said, ordering the concrete to be poured the next month.

Cracks emerged even at the start of the pouring process, according to the suit. It said the concrete supplier was “still experimenting with design mixes” three months after the start of the facade’s construction and without understanding the cause of the cracks or how to prevent them.

The result was a luxury tower, briefly the tallest residential building in the world, with “thousands upon thousands of cracks” beginning to form, the suit said.

Ideas were batted around for how to stop the cracking with various coatings and patching. Four separate consultants were hired. But the suit accuses developers of ignoring some of the repair ideas “due to potential schedule, cost and aesthetic impacts.”

Advertisement

In April 2016, one of the consultants issued a report detailing 1,893 defects, more than half of which it categorized as “life safety items.” Thousands of other cracks had been patched over during construction, the suit said. Some of the flaws were aesthetic, and others were “large voids, spalls of unknown origin, unfilled cracks, opened cracks and other serious deficiencies,” the suit said.

Developers wound up with repairs that neither stopped the flooding nor prevented further cracking, according to the suit.

The suit contends that members of the development team falsely misrepresented the “nature, extent and type of cracking” to the city’s Department of Buildings, the suit said.

Architects and engineers in New York are responsible for notifying the Buildings Department of any “immediately hazardous conditions” at properties where they are working. The department had not been notified of any such conditions at 432 Park Avenue, a spokesman said.

The suit also said the disclosures used in information for potential buyers and filed with the state attorney general’s office was revised in 2013.

Advertisement

Wording that had said the density of the concrete “will prevent water penetration” was changed to say the concrete and properly sealed windows “have been designed to prevent water penetration.”

New York

Video: Knicks Fans Celebrate With Ticker-Tape Parade

Published

on

Video: Knicks Fans Celebrate With Ticker-Tape Parade

“It’s been 53 years. I’ve been waiting that long.” “It’s been a very long time, a long time coming. And I’m so excited that my Knicks finally brought a championship home.” “Let’s go Knicks.” “I had to wake up at six o’clock.” “Knicks in five.” “Let’s go, Knicks.” “Let’s go, Knicks!” “We just moved to D.C. a few years ago, but we’re so happy to be back in New York, celebrating. Once we won we were like — we’re absolutely coming home. So, we had to bring Chester with us. I mean, he’s the biggest puppy Knicks fan there is. Chester, can you say Knicks in 5? Knicks in five.” “I got hurt a couple weeks ago, but this is the first time they’ve been to the finals since I was a year old. And so to be able to be here, this is a once-in-a-lifetime thing.” “My man’s out here with a boot and a Josh Hart jersey. My man’s got heart.” “It feels so overwhelming but overwhelming in a good way, where, like, I want to be — I want to, like, shoot some balls. I want to, like, just vibe with everyone because everyone’s here for one purpose, and that’s celebrating the Knicks.” “This has been like a uniting situation for New Yorkers, and I just can’t wait to feel the love from everybody.” “I think it’s a great equalizer, right? It brings everyone together. It doesn’t matter if you make $900,000 a year, if you make $50,000 a year. You’re united because of the Knicks.” “So often when this city comes together, it is because we are forced to by a moment of tragedy or adversity. What a gift it is to be brought together by pure, unfiltered joy.” “Most importantly, thank you to the fans. I’m not going to lie though, y’all all are some pretty hard critics, but we appreciate it. At least I do, appreciate it a lot.”

Continue Reading

New York

Video: Racing to the World Cup From New York

Published

on

Video: Racing to the World Cup From New York
Bus, train, bike or Uber: Which will get you to MetLife Stadium first? Four New York Times reporters raced from Midtown Manhattan to the first World Cup game there.

By Stefanos Chen, Maria Cramer, Christopher Maag, Wm. Ferguson, Sutton Raphael and Laura Salaberry

June 16, 2026

Continue Reading

New York

How a Book Editor and Jazz Musician Lives on $55,000 in West Harlem

Published

on

How a Book Editor and Jazz Musician Lives on ,000 in West Harlem

How can people possibly afford to live in one of the most expensive cities on the planet? It’s a question New Yorkers hear a lot, often delivered with a mix of awe, pity and confusion.

We surveyed hundreds of New Yorkers about how they spend, splurge and save. We found that many people — rich, poor or somewhere in between — live life as a series of small calculations that add up to one big question: What makes living in New York worth it?

Advertisement

Perhaps Ruby Pucillo’s number one bragging right is that she’s a tenth-generation New Yorker, one whose ancestors have lived thriftily in the boroughs since they first immigrated to New York City more than 300 years ago.

Ms. Pucillo, 25, has tried to carve out a life for herself that would mirror her family’s ideals of spending little and living a lot. But because the city her relatives arrived in generations ago now ranks among the most expensive in the world, that can present a challenge.

Advertisement

Ms. Pucillo’s 9 to 5 is working as an assistant editor at Abrams, an art book publishing house. After a recent promotion, her salary was bumped up to about $48,500 before taxes. Her work day begins on the subway, where she gets a head start on reading proposals and manuscripts as she travels to her office in the Financial District from uptown.

On many a weeknight, and sometimes on Saturdays, Ms. Pucillo performs as an improv jazz musician. She studied music and loves to play, but the amount she makes fluctuates — sometimes netting her upward of $1,000 in a month, other times $25, often something in the middle.

On Sundays, Ms. Pucillo travels back to where she grew-up, Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y., to teach French and give voice lessons for $350 a month.

Advertisement

All told, she makes about $55,000 a year, with wiggle room for her jazz gigs.

Rent is High, but Community is Free

Advertisement

Ms. Pucillo lives in a rent-stabilized prewar apartment with two roommates in West Harlem. Rent runs her about $1,460 a month, including utilities and internet.

“I spend more than half my income on my rent,” Ms. Pucillo said. “But I really like my apartment, and I live on the most beautiful block in Manhattan. Community is completely free.”

Advertisement

After rent is paid, Ms. Pucillo diligently tracks the leftovers of her paychecks on a spreadsheet on her computer; she can account for almost every cent. Each month, she spends $300 or less on groceries and $140 of her gross monthly income goes toward public transit, using a pretax subsidy her job offers.

Then Ms. Pucillo has a “cushion” tier of expenses, for unforeseen circumstances like a co-pay at the doctor’s office, a late-night taxi ride or a case of beer for a friend who might have done her a favor, like helping her move. “I know I’m not going to pay for these things every month,” she said, “but it’s nice to have a monthly increment that either goes into my savings or comes back out of my savings later.”

Ms. Pucillo’s monthly splurge is on entertainment — dining out, live music and shows, admission fees. “I budget $500 a month for that,” she said, which she conceded felt like a lot. “But it can disappear quickly in this city.”

Advertisement

And twice a year, she treats herself to a curly cut done by a friend on Long Island, for the budget total of $73 — not including, of course, a tip and the cost of a Long Island Rail Road ticket.

Ms. Pucillo doesn’t pay for many streaming services, but every few weeks she pays $3 to watch a movie on YouTube. She also pays $12.99 a month for Apple News and $10.99 for Apple Music. The remaining money goes into her savings.

Advertisement

An Eye for Deals

Many in Ms. Pucillo’s orbit “are in a difficult financial spot, too,” she said. “Many of them are creative and have a similar idea of what it means to achieve financial stability and what it means to make your dollar stretch.”

Advertisement

Ms. Pucillo’s ideal equation involves doubling or tripling up on activities to get the most bang for her buck, especially when it involves something free or a promotion that makes it very cheap.

When the fitness app ClassPass offered a discounted rate of $5 per month, she signed up so she could attend cheap workout and dance classes with friends. When she found a $1-a-month deal for a cooking app, she took it so she could share meals with friends without restaurant prices.

“I’m very opportunistic,” she said. “When things come up, I take them, but otherwise I figure out how to do just about everything for free.”

Advertisement

Recently, Ms. Pucillo had the shopping bug, but lacked the funds to act on it, so she and a group of friends arranged a clothing swap. Everyone emerged with new pieces for their wardrobe, she said, without spending a dime.

Ms. Pucillo credits her upbringing for making resourcefulness feel second nature.

Advertisement

“I come from a base line that says, ‘Don’t buy anything,’” she said. Her parents moved the family to Westchester when she was young and started renting in Hastings-on-Hudson because, she said, “they wanted to put us through really good public schools. They said, ‘If you can’t be rich, live where rich people live.’”

Ms. Pucillo is grateful for that. “I had to find ways to make money,” she said, which propelled her toward “what probably will be a different and better financial situation than my parents had, and than their parents had.” Her parents have since moved from Westchester to the Bronx.

She noted that because of an array of part-time jobs she worked during her undergraduate years, a hefty scholarship and a family tradition of supporting one’s children through college, she graduated debt-free, unlike many people she knows.

Advertisement

Saving Up for a Piece of the City

Even with a tendency toward frugality, she said, it’s still hard to navigate New York City as a 20-something, where the incomes of friends vary, and there are so many things that entice, especially when your friends want to drop money and you don’t.

Advertisement

“This is a very expensive place to socialize,” Ms. Pucillo said. But she’d never consider moving.

“The people in New York — I understand them, and they understand me,” she said. “There’s a directness that you really don’t find anywhere else.”

Ms. Pucillo’s dream is to own an apartment in the city — “a pretty lofty goal in this place,” she said. Despite the nine generations of New Yorkers that came before her, Ms. Pucillo’s family doesn’t own any property.

Advertisement

This is why Ms. Pucillo is dedicated to building up her savings however she can, and she is preparing to open her first line of credit after years of holding out.

Ms. Pucillo’s father, a guitar teacher and a Staten Island native, has always been fond of asking this question: If you had the choice between staying in New York for the rest of your life and never being allowed to leave, or being able to go anywhere else in the world, but never returning to New York — which would you choose?

Advertisement

She doesn’t have to deliberate for a second. “Absolutely, I would stay in New York for the rest of my life, and I would never leave.”

We are talking to New Yorkers about how they spend, splurge and save.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending