Connect with us

Washington

We can’t let Washington undermine NJ’s economic engine: intellectual property | Opinion

Published

on

We can’t let Washington undermine NJ’s economic engine: intellectual property | Opinion



3-minute read

play

  • New Jersey’s economy relies heavily on intellectual property rights, particularly in sectors like pharmaceuticals and technology.
  • The federal government’s Special 301 Report, which addresses global IP threats, has been weakened in recent years.
  • This weakening has emboldened foreign countries to infringe on U.S. IP, potentially harming New Jersey’s economy.
  • Stronger IP protections are needed to encourage investment and innovation in key New Jersey industries.

New Jersey is building the technologies that will define the 21st century. 

We’re a national leader in clean energy, with annual energy savings that surpass those of all but three other states. We’re developing breakthrough cures and treatments as the home of 13 of the nation’s 20 largest drug companies. And our new AI Hub, a collaboration between the New Jersey government and Princeton University, will soon put the Garden State at the forefront of U.S. artificial intelligence research.

Yet federal policymakers have cast a cloud over New Jersey’s bright future. For years, they’ve allowed foreign countries to erode the very foundation of our state’s economy: intellectual property, or IP, rights.

With a new administration and Congress in place, New Jersey’s representatives must take a stand in support of IP, before complacency in Washington tears down the dynamic economy we’ve worked so hard to build.

This is why NJ needs robust IP protections

IP rights are the cornerstone of technological progress. They give inventive companies the legal certainty that their ideas and breakthroughs won’t be stolen, which in turn allows them to bring investors on board. Without these protections, investors would be reluctant to commit the massive sums necessary to embark on risky, trailblazing projects.

Advertisement

New Jersey exemplifies the economic benefits that robust IP protections bring. Manufacturing, a field that relies heavily on patent rights, contributes over 10% of our state’s GDP. Other major sectors, like the life sciences, computer technology, and transportation, are similarly IP-intensive. In total, IP-dependent industries employ one in three New Jersey workers.

That’s why it’s so alarming that, in recent years, the federal government has been derelict in protecting Garden State companies’ IP from violations abroad.

Traditionally, federal policymakers have defended IP through something called the Special 301 Report. Issued annually by the U.S. Trade Representative, this report highlights global IP threats like piracy and patent theft, broadcasting to the rest of the world that America won’t tolerate violations of its citizens’ IP. The report also flags the economic impact of sectors that rely on IP. 

But for the past four years, the Biden administration weakened the Special 301 Report, softening its stance on numerous common IP violations, omitting some entirely, and cutting out the economic impact of IP-intensive industries.

Advertisement

So more than ever, foreign countries have been emboldened to steal the fruits of New Jerseyans’ hard work and ingenuity.

Look no further than the COVID-19 pandemic. Strong patent protections empowered New Jersey firms like Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson to lead the way in vaccine development, saving millions of lives. 

Yet soon afterward, despite no evidence that patents were limiting global vaccine distribution, USTR authorized countries around the world to ignore the patents on those vaccines.

In the years since, the Special 301 Report has erased all mention of the threat posed by such unilateral IP seizures, known as “compulsory licensing.” With America’s tacit approval, Colombia and the European Union are moving forward with more expansive compulsory licensing policies that threaten our state’s world-leading biopharma sector.

Advertisement

New Jersey companies cannot lose their ability to invest in innovation

If we don’t act soon to stop these efforts, New Jersey companies will lose much of their ability to invest in new treatments, stunting the medical progress that drives job growth here and saves lives around the globe. Bringing a new drug to market can cost upwards of $2 billion and take over a decade of research, with no guarantee of success. Undermining patent protections makes it harder for companies to justify these high-risk investments, especially in complex areas like oncology or rare diseases.

Those aren’t the only assaults on IP that USTR has permitted. Take drug price controls in Canada that undervalue innovative medicines. Or consider the restrictions on patenting imposed by countries like Argentina and India. 

By limiting U.S. companies’ ability to protect their inventions and earn revenue abroad, these policies hamstring domestic research and development, leading to less investment and fewer jobs in New Jersey’s high-tech industries.

Past Special 301 Reports took strong stands to prevent foreign countries from undermining our economy with policies like these. 

But for the last four years, USTR was silent, even as foreign IP infringement continued to mount.

Advertisement

New Jersey’s representatives in Congress must ensure this year’s report unequivocally condemns attacks on U.S. IP rights. Holding our trading partners accountable for violations will help safeguard our investments in medicine, renewable energy, and AI — ensuring the benefits stay with our workers and residents rather than flowing to foreign competitors.

New Jersey is leading America into the future. It’s time for Washington to do its part by backing our efforts with a strong Special 301 Report.

Sandip Shah, a visiting professor at Rutgers University, is founder and president of Market Access Solutions, which develops strategies to optimize patient access to life-changing therapies.



Source link

Advertisement

Washington

Harold Washington fought for voting rights. Here we go again

Published

on

Harold Washington fought for voting rights. Here we go again


My grandmother met Harold Washington once. I was young when she told me the story, so I don’t remember every detail. What I remember is what she kept: a mug he gave her, which she held onto until the day she died.

I grew up on South Shore Drive, sold the Sun-Times for a quarter at a paper stand at 75th and Stony Island, right in front of the KFC, and graduated from Hyde Park Academy. I did not know then that I would spend my career studying the civil rights terrain Washington had walked. But I understood, even as a child, what it meant that he was there.

I am thinking about him now.

Harold Washington served barely two terms in Congress before becoming Chicago’s first Black mayor in 1983. In that brief time on Capitol Hill, he did something that does not get remembered often enough. From the House Judiciary Committee in 1982, he helped lead the extension of key sections of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, including protections requiring jurisdictions with documented histories of racial discrimination to obtain federal approval before changing their voting rules.

Advertisement

The Congressional Black Caucus chose Washington to manage that bill on the House floor, where he spent seven weeks in hearings fighting to keep the enforcement mechanisms that protected Black voters from states that would prefer to be rid of them.

He won that fight.

Now, more than four decades later, we are fighting it again.

I am recalling Mayor Washington because of the efforts by President Donald Trump and many Republicans to pass the SAVE America Act, a proposed federal election law that would make it much tougher for many citizens to vote and is currently stalled in the U.S. Senate.

States curtail voting rights

Republican governors in Florida, Mississippi, Utah and South Dakota have already signed bills requiring documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration or citizenship checks, with similar legislation passed in Tennessee. Five states, Arizona, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming, will have show-your-papers requirements in place for the 2026 midterms.

Advertisement

In New Hampshire, the law has already produced its intended effect: In 2025 town elections, married women who did not have their marriage license on hand could not register, with at least one woman required to come back three times.

The infrastructure of exclusion does not require a federal law to take effect. It requires the threat of one, and the states that were waiting have already moved.

Washington would have recognized this immediately. The Voting Rights Act extension he managed in 1982 was not a symbolic gesture. It was a structural intervention, closing the door on states that wanted to escape accountability for their documented histories of discrimination.

The SAVE Act opens that door again, not with a return to literacy tests or poll taxes as such, but with a documentary requirement that functions identically: neutral on its face, devastating in its application and concentrated in its harm on the communities Washington spent his life trying to bring into the democratic process.

Washington’s 1983 mayoral campaign brought together Black voters on the South and West sides, Latino voters long excluded from the machine’s benefits and progressive white voters who believed Chicago could be something other than what it had always been.

Advertisement

His campaign was powered by a voter registration drive that added nearly 100,000 new voters to the rolls before the primary. He understood, instinctively and strategically, that expanding access to the ballot was not a prelude to political power. It was political power.

The SAVE Act would dismantle the registration infrastructure Black and Brown turnout campaigns depend on. Only 6% of voters register in person at an elections office. Washington’s coalition was built on the other 94%.

What Washington’s record demands of us

Washington deserves a reckoning, not a commemoration. He knew that formal equality was not enough, that the machinery of democratic participation had to be actively maintained against those who would narrow the circle.

His mug sat on my grandmother’s shelf for decades. She was not a politician. She was a Black woman on the South Side of Chicago who met a man running for mayor and felt, maybe for the first time, that he was talking to her. He gave her a mug. She kept it her whole life.

That is what is at stake. Not abstractions. People. The kind of people who keep a mug for decades because a politician made them feel like they mattered.

Advertisement

Harold Washington fought this battle once, from the Judiciary Committee floor, in seven weeks of hearings most people have forgotten. We are fighting it again, this time against a bill that would quietly push millions back out of the process, with six states already implementing versions of it before Congress even acts. The least we can do is remember who showed us how.

Donathan L. Brown, Ph.D., is an associate professor at Northeastern University, a former U.S. Fulbright professor, and the author of five books on civil rights and voting rights. A native of the South Side, he graduated from Hyde Park Academy.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Upriver Fire Near Spokane Triggers Evacuations For 12,000 Residents Amid Critical Fire Conditions

Published

on

Upriver Fire Near Spokane Triggers Evacuations For 12,000 Residents Amid Critical Fire Conditions


Washington state is currently experiencing an early-season flare-up of wildfire activity, particularly in the southeastern and central parts of the state, as well as the Upriver Fire, a fast-moving incident East of Spokane.

A combination of an ongoing statewide drought emergency and critical fire weather—including a strong, dry cold front with high wind gusts—has caused several fires to grow rapidly over the last few days.

The most significant other current active blazes include:

Omak Lake Road Fire: Things are moving fast up there right now. As of this afternoon (Wednesday, June 17), the Omak Lake Road Fire has officially merged with the nearby Kartar Fire, creating a massive blaze that has already burned roughly 6,500 acres on Colville Reservation land.
Tule Fire (Yakima Region): Ignited on June 14 south of Toppenish, this is currently the largest wildfire in the state, having ballooned to approximately 20,665 acres with 0% containment. It is burning primarily in dry grass and brush and has been producing a massive smoke plume that is impacting air quality throughout the Columbia River Gorge.
Juniper Dunes Fire (Franklin County): This fire has burned over 10,577 acres and is 10% contained. It has pushed into the challenging, roadless terrain of the Juniper Dunes Wilderness area, making ground access difficult for crews.
A Red Flag Warning remains in effect across much of Eastern Washington due to sustained high winds and low relative humidity, meaning any ongoing fires face an extreme risk of rapid spread, and new starts can ignite easily.

Is smoke from around the state forecasted to arrive in NCW?

Right now, North Central Washington is in the clear. The active wildfire smoke is staying well away from the Wenatchee Valley and surrounding areas, and local air quality remains firmly in the “Good” category.
The main reason for this breaks down to wind direction and fire locations:
Westerly Winds are Our Friend: Strong winds blowing from the west across the Cascades are actively dispersing air over NCW and pushing regional smoke eastward.

Advertisement

Where the Smoke is Heading Instead:

South: Earlier this week, massive plumes from the Tule Fire down in Yakima drifted west/southwest into the Columbia River Gorge and Portland-Vancouver metro.
East: With the current wind shift, smoke from the large fires in the Columbia Basin (like Tule and Juniper Dunes) is now being carried east toward the Tri-Cities, Walla Walla, and the Palouse.
North/Northeast: Up north, the Kartar and Omak Lake fires east of Omak are causing localized downwind smoke impacts, but the smoke is drifting east toward Nespelem and the Coulee Dam rather than dropping south into Chelan or Douglas counties.
Because these breezy, dry conditions are expected to persist through the rest of the week, weather and air quality officials note that intermittent smoke impacts will mostly be a concern for communities situated directly downwind (east) of the active blazes.

Wildfire smoke (on file via Canva)
Wildfire smoke (on file via Canva)

Where can I look online to see where wildfire smoke is coming from?

A few years ago, I discovered a Canadian website that not only shows you where wildfire smoke is coming from, but also how the smoke forecast will affect you in the coming days. It comes from the BC Wildfire Service.
Click on this helpful wildfire smoke map and bookmark it.
A couple of things to know about this BC Wildfire Service website.
1) When you first find the smoke map, select the Smoke Forecast button.

The map will come to life, showing where current wind conditions are directing wildfire smoke and where it is forecast to travel in the coming days.
2) Since it’s a service of the BC Wildfire Service, it doesn’t provide any information on fires here in the US, but it does show where smoke is forecast to come from any wildfires north and south of the border.

Where can I find updated information about wildfires in Washington?

The Watch Duty app for any device.
The Washington DNR fire dashboard is active throughout the fire season and shows up-to-date information on wildfires affecting Washington state.
View a full-screen version of the DNR fire dashboard with this link.

Oregon Coast Getaway Photos

Oregon Coast Getaway Photos

Advertisement

Gallery Credit: KEVIN MILLER

LOOK: These Photos Show Why ’70s Cars Were Something Special (and Obviously Better)

Big, bold, and built different — these ’70s cars looked and felt like nothing on the road today. Take a ride back and see them in their prime. [And we did our best to identify the models and dates, so if we got it wrong, gearheads, don’t come after us!]

Gallery Credit: Stephen Lenz

 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Eastern Washington wildfire forces evacuations and destroys homes

Published

on

Eastern Washington wildfire forces evacuations and destroys homes


SPOKANE, Wash. — High winds drove a wildfire into a Spokane neighborhood, forcing the evacuation of about 1,200 people and potentially damaging or destroying up to 15 structures, according to fire officials.

The Upriver Fire started at 12:17 p.m. Tuesday near Upriver Drive in northeast Spokane, said Fire District 9 spokesman Robert Gray.

“It moved rapidly up the hill and once it reach the top the wind shifted and it went right into the Northwoods neighborhood,” Gray said. Fire crews from Washington state and Idaho attacked the fire from the ground and air, but it quickly grew to 225 acres (.35 square miles) in an area called Beacon Hill.

The blaze was 10 percent contained by Wednesday morning, according to a report by the National Interagency Fire Center. The wind had died down overnight, but the fire was still burning on the ground, so there was potential to expand on Wednesday, said Isabelle Hoygaard, a spokesperson with the Washington state Department of Natural Resources.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending