Connect with us

Sports

Men’s college basketball way-too-early Top 25: Purdue’s No. 1; Florida isn’t going anywhere

Published

on

Men’s college basketball way-too-early Top 25: Purdue’s No. 1; Florida isn’t going anywhere

The budget needed to field a competitive college basketball roster seems to be the only thing in the world trending up right now, and the beautiful consequence is that most of the best players with eligibility remaining are returning to school. It is in that uncertain world, in the wake of Florida’s national championship win at Houston’s expense, that we bring you this too-early look at next season’s best teams.

You may notice that there are players listed in the projected ’25-26 rosters below who are also showing up in NBA mock drafts, most of which are projected second-round picks. In the past, most of those players would be gone. Now? Many will return because they would be sacrificing dollars to go to the NBA. Yes, that is where we are right now: High-major teams are paying better than most second-round contracts and definitely better than a two-way deal.

Of course, the ongoing movement in the portal (which closes to new entries on April 22, though players already in by that date can wait longer to decide on their next school) adds another degree of difficulty to this exercise. You’ll also notice some spots that I’m just assuming will be filled by a quality portal addition, based on need and the history of that program. With all that in mind, it’s not easy to find 25 rankable teams right now, but let’s get weird and go for it. Here’s your super-duper-early Top 25.

1. Purdue

Projected starters: Braden Smith, C.J. Cox, Fletcher Loyer, Trey Kaufman-Renn, Oscar Cluff (transfer)
Notable returners: Daniel Jacobsen, Gicarri Harris, Raleigh Burgess
Other newcomers: Antoine West

Talent plus roster continuity is a winning formula, and no team has a better combination of that at this moment than Purdue. The Boilermakers’ perimeter depth took a hit with the recent departures of Myles Colvin (to Wake Forest) and Camden Heide (Texas), but this will be the only team returning a first-team AP All-American in Braden Smith, not to mention an honorable mention in forward Trey Kaufman-Renn. When Houston prepped for Purdue in the Sweet 16, the Cougars’ coaches took to calling Smith, Kaufman-Renn and Fletcher Loyer “Stockton, Malone and Hornacek.”

Advertisement

Coach Matt Painter added a veteran big who is an elite rebounder in South Dakota State transfer Oscar Cluff, who was a starter on the Washington State team that won an NCAA Tournament game in 2024. Daniel Jacobsen could emerge as the next star Purdue big and could provide the rim protection this season’s group really missed without Zach Edey. It’s also possible Purdue could add one perimeter player or more, which would strengthen the Boilers’ preseason No. 1 case.

2. Florida

Projected starters: Portal Player TBD, Denzel Aberdeen, Thomas Haugh, Alex Condon, Rueben Chinyelu
Notable returners: Micah Handlogten, Sam Alexis, Urban Klavzar
Other newcomers: Alex Lloyd, CJ Ingram (freshman)

Returning the entire frontcourt is a great place to start for the national champions. They already had the deepest frontcourt in college basketball and will retain that title and add “best frontcourt in college basketball” to the superlatives. (And even if Alex Condon gets drafted, this is still a really good group.) The assumption is the Gators will get a star guard out of the portal. The sales pitch is pretty easy: Come be our next Walter Clayton Jr. Denzel Aberdeen was one of the best bench guards in the country and should take a leap. It wouldn’t be a surprise if Thomas Haugh and Condon turned into 2026 first-rounders.

3. Houston

Projected starters: Milos Uzan, Emanuel Sharp, Terrance Arceneaux, Chris Cenac Jr. (freshman), Joseph Tugler
Notable returners: Mercy Miller, Ramon Walker
Other newcomers: Isiah Harwell, Kingston Flemings, Bryce Jackson, Kalifa Sakho (transfer)

Milos Uzan likely will be on the fence about staying or going, and if he leaves, expect Houston to grab a veteran point guard to allow freshman Kingston Flemings the proper time to marinate in the program. This roster will be more reliant on freshmen than any of Kelvin Sampson’s others, but it still has one of the better returning veteran cores. Expect JoJo Tugler to expand his game and be one of the most valuable bigs in the country. Emanuel Sharp could make that familiar Houston leap in which a guard goes from a very good player to an All-American.

Advertisement

4. Louisville

Projected starters: Mikel Brown Jr. (freshman), Ryan Conwell (transfer), Isaac McKneely (transfer), Kasean Pryor, Aly Khalifa
Notable returners: James Scott, Khani Rooths
Other newcomers: Adrian Wooley (transfer), Sananda Fru

Many teams at the top of these rankings are here mostly because of roster continuity. Here’s the team that has won the transfer portal so far. Head coach Pat Kelsey has earned some trust after building an entire roster from scratch in his first year and coming away with a winner. There is some familiarity back, too, with both Kasean Pryor and Aly Khalifa, who transferred in a year ago only to miss most — or all, in Khalifa’s case — of the season.

Khalifa was one of the best passing bigs in the country at BYU, and a slimmed-down version will take the floor for Louisville. The backcourt is stacked and talented: Ryan Conwell was one of the best guards in the Big East at Xavier; Adrian Wooley is getting NBA buzz; Isaac McKneely is one of best shooters in the country; Mikel Brown Jr. is a five-star freshman. If Pryor can play at the level he was starting to flash before his injury and Kelsey can microwave the chemistry, this could hit big.

5. Michigan

Projected starters: Elliot Cadeau (transfer), Nimari Burnett, Roddy Gayle, Yaxel Lendeborg (transfer), Morez Johnson (transfer)
Notable returners: LJ Cason
Other newcomers: Trey McKenney, Winters Grady

Dusty May is off to a terrific start in the transfer portal, especially up front with Yaxel Lendeborg and Morez Johnson. Those two give him a semi-comparable frontline to what he just had in Danny Wolf and Vlad Goldin. Lendeborg has the perimeter skills to play the Wolf role, and Johnson is more of an old-school big like Goldin, although he scores via the hustle categories rather than a strictly back-to-the-basket game.

Advertisement

Elliot Cadeau offers some promise in a new system because his vision and passing can be elite, though some may be worried by Cadeau’s shooting track record (28.1 percent from 3 in two years at North Carolina). Adding more shooting out of the portal could help, but the return of Nimari Burnett at least gives the Wolverines a proven deep threat. Roddy Gayle’s quest for consistency could control Michigan’s ceiling. And the one big question mark for the next two months will be whether Lendeborg shows; his stock could get to the point where he stays in the NBA Draft.

6. BYU

Projected starters: Portal Player TBD, Portal Player TBD, Richie Saunders, AJ Dybantsa (freshman), Keba Keita
Notable returners: Dawson Baker, Mihailo Boskovic
Other newcomers: Dominique Diomande (transfer), Xavion Staton

It’s possible point guard Egor Demin returns for a sophomore season. If that happens, I’ll probably be moving the Cougars up a couple of spots. Demin is a projected first-rounder but one who probably would benefit from another year of seasoning. One thing is clear: BYU donors have made a sizable investment in hoops. Combine that with how fun it looked to play in Kevin Young’s system during the former NBA assistant’s first year as a college head coach, and you’d expect the Cougars to attract some talented guards to fill those backcourt spots.

Obviously the headliner here is AJ Dybantsa, who is seen as a surefire 2026 lottery pick. Dybantsa gives Young some lineup flexibility because he’s a 6-9 super-athlete with perimeter skills, and he’s entering a program with a proven star already on the roster in Richie Saunders. The notable returners listed above are both good enough to start — Dawson Baker at the two and Mihailo Boskovic at the four. If the Cougars can just add one more proven guard, one of those could take the other starting spot and still give you a contender on paper.

7. Michigan State

Projected starters: Jeremy Fears, Jase Richardson, Coen Carr, Jaxon Kohler, Carson Cooper
Notable returners: Jesse McCulloch
Other newcomers: Cam Ward, Jordan Scott

Advertisement

The current projected starting lineup played only 13 minutes together in 2024-25, per CBB Analytics. It might be unrealistic to play Coen Carr on the wing and not at the 4, but this would be a terrific defensive lineup. (And, for the record, that group was plus-12 in those 13 minutes on the floor.) The Spartans clearly need to add some shooting, but they clearly needed shooting this past year and they still won the Big Ten.

The big question mark here is Jase Richardson. He would typically be someone I’d project as leaving, but the gut feeling from a few who know that program way better than myself is that he’ll be back. Returning five key contributors from a Big Ten champion is a nice starting spot. If Tom Izzo can add some quality depth on the perimeter through the portal, he could have himself another conference champ.

8. Auburn

Projected starters: Tahaad Pettiford, Portal TBD, Chad Baker-Mazara, Keyshawn Hall (transfer), Portal TBD
Notable returners: Jahki Howard
Other newcomers: Sebastian Williams-Adams, Kaden Magwood, Simon Walker, Abdul Bashir

Both Tahaad Pettiford and Keyshawn Hall are preseason All-American candidates in my eyes. Hall is built to get buckets and should thrive in the spots Auburn will put him in playing out of the flex. He just averaged 18.8 points, 7.1 rebounds and 2.4 assists with decent efficiency numbers at UCF, and now he’ll be surrounded by better players, which should help him in the efficiency category.

Pettiford likely would have been a real threat to leave a few years ago, but in college basketball’s 2025 model, it makes a lot of sense for him to return. If he has the kind of season I think he might have, he could be a lottery pick in 2026. That leaves head coach Bruce Pearl in a really good starting position, and based on Pearl’s ability to find portal additions who fit his system, this roster could be one that ends up back on the top line next year, especially if Pettiford or Hall pull a Johni Broome and elevate to national player of the year consideration.

Advertisement

9. UConn

Projected starters: Silas Demary Jr. (transfer), Braylon Mullins (freshman), Solo Ball, Jaylin Stewart, Tarris Reed
Notable returners: Jayden Ross
Other newcomers: Darius Adams, Eric Reibe, Jacob Furphy

This is another roster I could be underselling, especially considering the flashes Solo Ball and Tarris Reed produced this year. Another season in the system for each could produce better consistency. Silas Demary Jr. gives UConn the Tristen Newton replacement it lacked this year, a big guard who can run the offense and also generate his own. It’s possible that Alex Karaban returns as well, and if he doesn’t, UConn may use the money set aside for his possible return to land his replacement.

10. Duke

Projected starters: Cayden Boozer (freshman), Caleb Foster, Isaiah Evans, Cameron Boozer (freshman), Patrick Ngongba
Notable returners: Darren Harris, Maliq Brown
Other newcomers: Shelton Henderson, Nikolas Khamenia

Duke could have some roster retention work to do here. Isaiah Evans is in demand as a hired gun, and Shelton Henderson was recruited by former Duke assistant Jai Lucas and may decide he wants to go play for Lucas at Miami. What will always be true is that Duke, the betting favorite to claim 2026 title when the sun came up on Tuesday, should have one of the most talented rosters in college hoops.

Cameron Boozer is not Cooper Flagg, but he is a ready-made star for this level with a low-post game that’s still very relevant in college hoops. It’ll take some style adjustments, but the Blue Devils will likely play through Boozer and sophomore-to-be Patrick Ngongba. Head coach Jon Scheyer will again have great positional size but may not have quite as much length and shot blocking on the defensive interior. Adding a few more veteran guards, even if they’re bench guys, would be beneficial.

Advertisement

11. Arizona

Projected starters: Jaden Bradley, Portal Player TBD, Anthony Dell’Orso, Koa Peat (freshman), Motiejus Krivas
Notable returners: Tobe Awaka
Other newcomers: Dwayne Aristode, Bryce James

Even with the loss of Henri Veesaar (now at North Carolina), the Wildcats have one of the best and deepest frontcourts in the country with three startable players in Koa Peat, Motiejus Krivas and Tobe Awaka.

Peat is versatile enough to slide to the three and allow coach Tommy Lloyd to go with a giant frontline, but he’s probably better for the offense as a playmaking four. Motiejus Krivas was probably about to have a breakout campaign before a foot injury ended his season in December. Lloyd’s priority now is finding a Caleb Love replacement. The quality of that eventual add could determine whether the Wildcats stay this high, but banking on Lloyd fielding a top-10ish outfit is almost a given at this point.

12. Texas Tech

Projected starters: Christian Anderson, Kevin Overton, Portal TBD, JT Toppin, Federiko Federiko
Notable returners: Eemeli Yalaho
Other newcomers: None

Head coach Grant McCasland has a lot of work to do in the portal, but if JT Toppin does return, he at least has an All-American to build around. Christian Anderson will take over at point guard and should turn into one of the top guards in the country. It’s not easy to crack the rotation as a freshman guard in college hoops, and it’s even harder to make 70 3s at a 38 percent clip as a freshman; Anderson did both with the coolness of a veteran.

Advertisement

Kevin Overton had some moments in the NCAA Tournament when you could see how he’ll become a consistent double-digit scorer once his confidence arrives. McCasland needs to grab a few shooters, but the main portal priority is finding another chess piece like Darrion Williams. His decision to transfer hurt. Make a few smart portal grabs, which Texas Tech has done as well as anyone, and McCasland will have himself another team that could go deep in the tournament.

13. Alabama

Projected starters: Aden Holloway, Latrell Wrightsell, Derrion Reid, Jarin Stevenson, Aiden Sherrell
Notable returners: Houston Mallette
Other newcomers: Jalil Bethea (transfer), London Jemison, Davion Hannah, Amari Allen, Taylor Bol Bowen (transfer), Noah Williamson (transfer)

This feels a little low for the Crimson Tide because there’s a good core returning and head coach Nate Oats is on one heck of a run, but it feels like Oats is missing a star now that Mark Sears is finally graduating. If Labaron Philon returns, maybe he’s that guy. Aden Holloway could also become that dude.

But those aren’t the only two intriguing players here who could be in for breakouts, especially in the sophomore class with Aiden Sherrell and Derrion Reid. Miami transfer Jalil Bethea could also thrive in a new spot. Depth is not an issue, and the battle for spots in the preseason could be healthy. The speed with which this group develops chemistry and finds that star could determine where the Crimson Tide fall on the spectrum between contender and pretender.

14. Iowa State

Projected starters: Tamin Lipsey, Nate Heise, Milan Momcilovic, Joshua Jefferson, Blake Buchanan (transfer)
Notable returners: None
Other newcomers: Eric Mulder (transfer), Mason Williams (transfer), Jamarion Batemon, Killyan Toure, Xzavion Mitchell, Dominykas Pieta

Advertisement

This could be a little low for the Cyclones considering the proven commodities coming back. My one concern is whether they’ll find a dynamic scoring guard to replace Curtis Jones and Keshon Gilbert. Once Gilbert’s role faded late in the season, the Cyclones were no longer the elite outfit they had been in 2023-24 and early this season.

They could still add that player in the portal, moving Nate Heise back to more of a sixth man role. That would likely elevate this team to top-10 status. But maybe it’s just time for a slight tactical shift, leaning into the star power of Joshua Jefferson and Milan Momcilovic. There’s still a lot to like here, and the Blake Buchanan addition makes sense because he comes from a program (Virginia) that T.J. Otzelberger has long admired.

15. Kansas

Projected starters: Darryn Peterson (freshman), Elmarko Jackson, Jayden Dawson (transfer), Tre White (transfer), Flory Bidunga
Notable returners: Bryson Tiller, Jamari McDowell
Other newcomers: Samis Calderon

It feels like Kansas is being more intentional in the transfer portal, going for players who can be complementary pieces instead of solely chasing name recognition. Maybe that comes from the luxury of confidence that Darryn Peterson can be a star. Bill Self appears to be doing for Peterson what Jon Scheyer did for Cooper Flagg, built a roster around his stud freshman. Convincing Flory Bidunga to return could be the biggest win of the early offseason. For KU fans, watching Bidunga elsewhere may have felt similar to the experience of watching Zuby Ejiofor thrive at St. John’s.

Peterson and Bidunga have the potential to be an elite pick-and-roll tandem. And Kansas could go back to playing more like Self played the year he started KJ Adams at center and surrounded him with guards and big wings, mostly ignoring post-ups. That 2022-23 team was the last No. 1 seed Self produced. He still needs more perimeter depth, and one more starter-level guy at the three/four probably wouldn’t hurt, but it’s starting to come together.

Advertisement

16. North Carolina

Projected starters: Seth Trimble, Drake Powell, Jonathan Powell (transfer), Caleb Wilson (freshman), Henri Veesaar (transfer)
Notable returners: Ven-Allen Lubin
Other newcomers: Derek Dixon, Isaiah Denis

This will be a prove-it year for Hubert Davis, who saw the weakness of his previous team — the frontcourt — and has turned it into a strength. Caleb Wilson is a lottery-level talent with elite defensive capabilities, and Veesaar is another player who projects as a pro. So UNC goes from no pros up front to two likely ones. Now the worry is in the backcourt: The cupboard is not bare with Seth Trimble and Drake Powell returning, but it’d be smart to go get at least one proven perimeter player from the portal, preferably at point guard.

17. St. John’s

Projected starters: Portal Player TBD, Joson Sanon (transfer), Simeon Wilcher, Bryce Hopkins (transfer), Zuby Ejiofor
Notable returners: Vince Iwuchukwu, Ruben Prey, Lefteris Liotopoulos
Other newcomers: None

If Rick Pitino lands a stud guard, I’ll probably be inclined to move St. John’s into the top 10 because it’s Pitino. Sanon will likely benefit from his coaching and skill development and could become the next portal wonder — and he’s a guard who can make a 3, a weapon the Red Storm did not always have in 2024-25.

If Bryce Hopkins can stay healthy, that’s one of the better frontcourts in the country. Losing Big East player of the year RJ Luis was strange, but it is an opportunity to try to modernize by filling the perimeter spots with guys who can live beyond the 3-point line and in the midrange. Find guys who can do that and guard like this past bunch, and Pitino will be battling UConn for the Big East title.

Advertisement

18. Kentucky

Projected starters: Jaland Lowe (transfer) Jasper Johnson (freshman), Otega Oweh, Kam Williams (transfer), Brandon Garrison
Notable returners: Collin Chandler, Trent Noah, Travis Perry
Other newcomers: Malachi Moreno, Acaden Lewis, Mouhamed Dioubate (transfer)

Mark Pope loves to play through his fours and fives on the perimeter, using those guys to initiate the zoom actions and finding cutters. Brandon Garrison has at least played in the system for a year, but there was a drop-off when he came on the floor and Amari Williams took a seat. It’ll be interesting to see whether Pope makes any stylistic changes to his offense based on the personnel.

Jaland Lowe is much more of a ball-dominant guard than Lamont Butler was, and maybe we’ll see a higher frequency of ball screens with Lowe at point guard. While Pope has plenty of depth already, it wouldn’t be surprising to see him try to add a few veterans. This is a much younger roster than his first one. The Cats likely will not be as good early as they were last year, but there will probably be more in-season growth, because last year’s group came pretty ready-made, despite an offseason of changes.

19. Creighton

Projected starters: Nik Graves (transfer), Josh Dix (transfer), Jasen Green, Jackson McAndrew, Owen Freeman (transfer)
Notable returners: Fedor Zugic, Isaac Traudt
Other newcomers: Hudson Greer

At the Players Era Festival in November this past year, I was convinced Creighton wasn’t an NCAA Tournament team. The lesson? Never underestimate coach Greg McDermott and his ability to get a team to improve. I love the addition of Josh Dix, one of my favorite perimeter scorers in the portal. He and fellow Iowa transfer Owen Freeman should thrive in McDermott’s offense. Hudson Greer fits McDermott’s system as well.

Advertisement

The key will be whether Nik Graves, who averaged 17.5 points and 4.3 assists at Charlotte, can handle the move up in levels. McDermott has had a good run of point guards, and the Bluejays need that one to hit. Also, trying to play defense without big man Ryan Kalkbrenner no longer around to fix everything around the rim will be an adjustment. This team should be able to score, but there are definitely defensive concerns. (See Iowa’s 167th-ranked defense.)

20. UCLA

Projected starters: Donovan Dent (transfer), Skyy Clark, Eric Dailey, Tyler Bilodeau, Xavier Booker (transfer)
Notable returners: Trent Perry
Other newcomers: Steven Jamerson (transfer), Jamar Brown (transfer)

Donovan Dent is one of the top transfer portal prizes thus far and should solidify things at point guard, a position that has been a little shaky since the graduation of Tyger Campbell. I don’t love the Xavier Booker fit. He doesn’t seem like a Mick Cronin player, but maybe a change of scenery will get him to play to the hype he once had. If he’s a miss, the Bruins can downsize to the Eric Dailey-Tyler Bilodeau frontcourt. Those two and Dent make for one of the better trios in college hoops.

21. Illinois

Projected starters: Kylan Boswell, Portal Player TBD, Will Riley, Tomislav Ivisic, Zvonimir Ivisic
Notable returners: Jake Davis
Other newcomers: Brandon Lee, Keaton Wagler

The Ivisic brothers together could be fun to watch on offense. Defensively? I’ve got some questions as to how that’ll work, and maybe Brad Underwood will play them together only rarely. But both are awesome offensive talents, and Underwood could get creative with the system he builds around them.

Advertisement

Will Riley could end up leaving for the NBA, but if not, he should become a focal point. A starting-caliber guard and some power forward help is expected via the portal, and there’s already enough talent here to believe this will be a team worth ranking once the roster is set.

22. Missouri

Projected starters: Anthony Robinson, Sebastian Mack, Trent Pierce, Mark Mitchell, Jevon Porter (transfer)
Notable returners: Trent Burns, TO Barrett, Peyton Marshall
Other newcomers: Luke Northweather (transfer), Aaron Rowe, Nicholas Randall

This might be a tad low for the Tigers, maybe a product of recency bias from their one-and-done tourney exit. It’s entirely possible Anthony Robinson turns into an absolute star as a junior, and I really like Sebastian Mack in the Tony Perkins role. The wild card is, what kind of productivity do the Tigers get out of the center position. Jevon Porter, who becomes the third Porter brother to play for the Tigers, was an efficient scorer on a middle-of-the-pack WCC team, but he can shoot the 3.

Trent Burns, who is 7-foot-5 and redshirted this past year, can also shoot the 3 and Mizzou staff is excited about his potential, but he looks like a strong wind could take him down. Then there’s Peyton Marshall, a 7-footer on the other end of the weight spectrum who couldn’t crack the rotation as a freshman. The Tigers could play small with Mark Mitchell at the five, but the best SEC teams have been big up front, and Mizzou could have one of the tallest teams in the country if those centers are playable.

23. Arkansas

Projected starters: Darius Acuff Jr. (freshman), DJ Wagner, Billy Richmond, Karter Knox, Trevon Brazile
Notable returners: None
Other newcomers: Meleek Thomas, Isaiah Sealy

Advertisement

John Calipari is always going to have talent, and he’ll add two more five-stars in Darius Acuff Jr. and Meleek Thomas. For the Razorbacks to play to this ranking, guys like Billy Richmond and Karter Knox must improve, but they both seemed to be trending upwards as the season ended. The needs for this team in the portal are shooting and frontcourt depth. Thomas is a gunner who could provide some of the shooting, but it’d be good to add at least one proven perimeter scorer, and then Calipari needs a big who can defend and rebound.

24. Ohio State

Projected starters: Bruce Thornton, John Mobley, Devin Royal, Sean Stewart, Christoph Tilly (transfer)
Notable returners: None
Other newcomers: Gabe Cupps (transfer), A’mare Bynum, Dorian Jones

This team might look out of place considering the Buckeyes return a core that just went 17-15, but they did finish this year No. 37 at KenPom and had stretches where they looked like a Top 25 team. Love the Bruce Thornton and John Mobley backcourt. Adding Christoph Tilly from Santa Clara solidifies the center position after a year of riding the Aaron Bradshaw roller coaster. It will be important for Jake Diebler to prove he’s the coach to lead this program after a slightly disappointing first full year, but retaining a strong core from a top-40 team will get you ranked in this exercise.

25. Tennessee

Projected starters: Ja’Kobi Gillespie, Portal Player TBD, Portal Player TBD, Jaylen Carey (transfer), Felix Okpara
Notable returners: Cade Phillips, JP Estrella
Other newcomers: Amari Evans, DeWayne Brown, Troy Henderson

The Vols are set up front with two guys off the bench in Cade Phillips and JP Estrella who could end up winning starting spots. Estrella, who missed most of 2024-25, has a chance to give the Vols some inside scoring they haven’t had in a while. Ja’Kobi Gillespie (from Maryland) was a very important transfer signing. Now all of the attention turns to the two and  three spots. Considering Rick Barnes has had Dalton Knecht and Chaz Lanier back-to-back, I’d imagine there’s a really good wing out there who will be persuaded to come be the next one.

Advertisement

(Illustration: Dan Goldfarb / The Athletic; Photos: Ed Zurga, Rey Del Rio, Jamie Squire / Getty Images)

Sports

Florida AG launches civil rights investigation into MLB’s warning to Christian pitchers over Pride Night caps

Published

on

Florida AG launches civil rights investigation into MLB’s warning to Christian pitchers over Pride Night caps

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The attorneys general from Missouri and Florida have reacted strongly to the controversy stirred when Major League Baseball warned three San Francisco Giants players about inscribing a Bible verse on their Pride Night caps, and that reaction includes MLB being served with a subpoena that signals the launch of an official investigation.

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier launched his investigation on Friday by serving MLB with a subpoena to investigate whether it is violating the civil rights of players based on their religious beliefs.

The general purpose and scope of Florida’s investigation “extend(s) to possible civil rights and deceptive and unfair trade practices violations in matters of employment concerning the business practices, policies, and procedures of Major League Baseball,” per the subpoena obtained by Fox News Digital.

In a letter from Uthmeier to MLB Commissioner Robert Manfred, the AG warns that “a pattern or practice of selectively enforcing its rules to benefit favored secular beliefs over disfavored religious beliefs would not only potentially violate Florida civil rights law, but it would also violate the League’s own policies.

Advertisement

MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL FACES BACKLASH FOR ITS STANCE ON CHRISTIANS WRITING BIBLE VERSES ON PRIDE CAPS

“And a practice of claiming not to discriminate based on religion while discriminating based on religion could further amount to an unfair or deceptive trade practice in violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.”

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier speaks at a news conference in Orlando on July 15, 2025, where he said U.S. Masters Swimming should not allow transgender athletes to compete against women swimmers or face legal action. Advocates Cassidy Carlisle and Lainey Armistead also attended. (Rich Pope/Orlando Sentinel/Tribune News Service)

Uthmeier is particularly troubled by the fact MLB said its warning had nothing to do with the players’ religious beliefs but rather was strictly because of a violation of the league’s uniform code.

It should be noted MLB said in a follow-up statement to its initial warning to the players that it was merely enforcing its uniform codes and the warning had nothing to do with Giants pitchers Landen Roupp, JT Brubaker and Ryan Walker writing a Bible verse on the team’s Pride Night Cap most of the other players wore.

Advertisement

MLB ACCUSED OF ‘DOUBLE STANDARD’ AFTER CALLING OUT PLAYERS’ BIBLE MESSAGES DESPITE BACKING BLM IN 2020

Uthmeier noted that doesn’t ring true and presented in his letter a handful of examples where MLB has been absolutely fine with players adding to their uniform.

“In 2019, for example, a Cincinnati Reds player wrote on his cap in tribute to a nearby mass shooting,” Uthmeier wrote to Manfred. “And in 2020, MLB evidently added new, sweeping exceptions to its uniform rules by allowing players to ‘support social justice and diversity and inclusion.’ These policy changes included permitting players to add Black Lives Matter patches to their sleeves.

“MLB therefore appears to applaud — even change its rules for — the ideological beliefs it prefers, but targets players who express religious views the League doesn’t like.”

Commissioner of Major League Baseball Robert D. Manfred Jr. speaks at the 2024 MLB Draft presented by Nike at Cowtown Coliseum in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 14, 2024. (Daniel Shirey/MLB Photos via Getty Images)

Advertisement

The Florida subpoena, issued under the Florida Civil Rights Act, demands action from MLB on July 23, 2026, at 9 a.m.. At that time, MLB must deliver to the AG’s office documents including:

  • All documents concerning how MLB characterized or classified the June 2026 cap writing, including, for example, whether MLB treated it as religious expression, political messaging, protest, or a violation unrelated to its content.
  • All documents concerning what prompted MLB’s review of and warning regarding the June 2026 cap writing, including any complaint, media inquiry, internal escalation, or third-party communication received before the warning issued, and the timing of each relative to the warning.
  • All documents concerning the actual June 2026 warnings issued by the MLB to any club.
  • All documents, including drafts and internal deliberations, concerning MLB’s decision to issue and publicly announce the June 2026 warnings, and any analysis of whether doing so adhered to the Code or with MLB’s treatment of comparable non-religious expression.

San Francisco Giants pitcher Landen Roupp wrote “Genesis 9:12-16” on his Pride-Night themed hat. (Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images)

Uthmeier is thus joining Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway, who recently wrote a letter to Manfred asking the commissioner to confirm that no player who has chosen to refrain from “wearing Pride Month paraphernalia or included Bible verses on Pride Month hats” will not be disciplined in any way.

Hanaway’s letter states that if Manfred fails to answer by June 25 or does not confirm that no discipline will be levied, she too will open an investigation of MLB.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The two attorneys general have authority over their individual states. But it affects four MLB teams.

Advertisement

Florida is home to two MLB teams — the Tampa Bay Rays and Miami Marlins — while Missouri is home to the St. Louis Cardinals and Kansas City Royals.

FOLLOW ARMANDO SALGUERO ON X: @ARMANDOSALGUERO

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Commentary: Why MLB’s Pride Night cap condemnation isn’t the anti-Christian crackdown conservatives claim

Published

on

Commentary: Why MLB’s Pride Night cap condemnation isn’t the anti-Christian crackdown conservatives claim

Amid the first days of grief after Alex Vesia and his wife lost their newborn daughter last fall, Vesia noticed something as he watched the World Series on television. He paused the broadcast, then checked the video, then texted another player to make sure.

51.

Dodgers teammates wore his number on their caps. So did players from the Toronto Blue Jays.

“It was awesome,” Vesia said. “It was a very heartwarming moment.”

Moving.

Advertisement

Touching.

And, under baseball’s rules, illegal.

Who knew, really, until this week? Three pitchers from the San Francisco Giants wrote the name of a Bible verse on their Pride Night caps and, amid an uproar, Major League Baseball said it had warned the players that “writing of any kind, with any message” on any playing apparel is not permitted. The issue, the league said in a statement, was not what they wrote on their caps but simply that they wrote on them at all.

Said MLB in the statement: “We have given the same warning numerous times in the past to players for messages such as ‘Dad’, ‘Happy Mother’s Day, I Love Mom’ and names of family members.”

To its credit, the league did not enforce the rule when Vesia’s number started appearing on caps in the World Series. But, if you’re going to draw a line on enforcement, where should you draw it?

Advertisement

In San Francisco, the actions of the Giants’ pitchers were widely condemned.

“They were in for a rude awakening with the response, and it wasn’t just from the gay community,” Giants broadcaster and former pitcher Mike Krukow told KNBR, the team’s flagship radio station. “It was from the Northern California community that supports the gay community.”

In response to media inquiries, and as first reported by Outsports, MLB confirmed it had warned the three players. I asked the league whether warnings had been issued in two other instances in which players had written on their caps, including Clayton Kershaw last year writing the same Bible verse on his Pride Night cap that the Giants’ pitchers wrote this year. MLB declined to comment.

“I got chastised by the league when I put Charlie [Kirk]’s name on my hat last year, because a man was murdered in cold blood,” Dodgers pitcher Blake Treinen told me, “and now these gentlemen who are relievers in San Francisco are getting chastised by the league for putting a Bible verse on their hat. It’s crazy to me.”

Treinen said league officials had told him the rule is strictly enforced.

Advertisement

“I straight up asked Clayton last year, ‘Did they call you when you put that on your hat?’” Treinen said. “He said, ‘No.’”

The Pride caps feature team logos decorated in the colors of the rainbow, a symbol long associated with the gay community. In the Bible verse cited by the pitchers (Genesis 9:12-16), the rainbow represents “the everlasting covenant between God and all living creatures.”

That the league would warn players against writing a Bible verse on their caps ignited a wave of conservative outrage, from Vice President JD Vance to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.

Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley fired off a letter to MLB commissioner Rob Manfred, alleging apparent discrimination “against baseball players who profess their Christian faith” and threatening the league’s antitrust exemption. Assistant U.S. Atty. Gen. Harmeet Dhillon said on national television that players might be able to file a claim for employment discrimination.

That is complete nonsense. This is what you want: When employees raise an issue to their employer, the employer listens and addresses their concerns.

Advertisement

In 2023, the year after five Tampa Bay Rays players declined to wear rainbow logos for Pride Night, Manfred said the league would no longer compel players to do so.

“We have told teams, in terms of actual uniforms, hats, bases that we don’t think putting logos on them is a good idea just because of the desire to protect players: not putting them in a position of doing something that may make them uncomfortable because of their personal views,” Manfred said then.

Teammates congratulate Freddie Freeman after his walk-off home run gave the Dodgers a 1-0 win on June 5, when the Dodgers held their annual Pride Night. Blake Treinen, the winning pitcher that night, elected to wear his regular Dodgers cap instead of the Pride version.

(Katelyn Mulcahy / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Manfred said the Pride Night celebrations could go on, however a team wished to stage them — or not, in the case of the Texas Rangers, the only one of the 30 MLB teams that declines to hold a Pride Night. And the league still sells Pride gear on its website for all teams, including the Rangers.

In the cases of the Giants and Dodgers, MLB grandfathered each team’s long-running use of a rainbow logo on the cap, with this accommodation to players: If you don’t feel comfortable wearing the Pride cap, just wear your regular cap.

That is what Treinen and outfielder Alex Call did when the Dodgers celebrated Pride Night. That is also what a fourth Giants pitcher did.

“My job is to abide by the rules,” Treinen said. “Ultimately, the only rule we have is to wear our team-issued uniform. So that’s what I chose to do.”

To Treinen, the decision over whether to wear a Pride cap is not about passing judgment on anyone else but about what he sees as the push “to force something on people that you know that is controversial to their faith — and, in fact, straight up against their faith.”

Advertisement

He expressed his support for the Giants pitchers.

“Kudos to those men over there who are standing strong in their faith,” he said. “It’s a sad thing to corner someone and try to make them feel bad about their convictions.”

I respect Treinen for explaining his viewpoint. To me, wearing a Pride cap for one night does not diminish your faith at all. It might sharpen your convictions. More important, it signals a welcome to everyone in the community that buys the tickets and broadcast subscriptions that help pay your salary.

“I think a few people made it about themselves and not about the community,” San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie told the Bay Area Reporter.

We always proclaim the life lessons of sports. One of them: Sometimes you have to put the team’s interests ahead of your own.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?

Published

on

2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

After its massive 1-0 win over South Korea on Thursday night, Mexico has won Group A and officially clinched a spot in the knockout round. 

El Tri will play its Round of 32 game in Mexico City, and will face the third-place finisher in either Group C/E/F/H/I.

This is the fourth time that Mexico has topped the group stage of a World Cup, with the other three coming in 1986, 1994 and 2002. 

With the win, Mexico remains unbeaten in World Cup group games at home, going a combined 6-2-0 (W-D-L), with two wins and a draw in 1970 and 1986, and now two wins in 2026. 

Advertisement

Before the tournament began, Mexico was listed at +6500 to win the World Cup. Now, after winning its first two games of the tournament, Mexico has surged up the oddsboard to +5000. 

Can Mexico build off its first two matches and make a deep run in this tournament? Let’s check out the updated odds for El Tri as of June 19.

This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports.

Team Mexico — Stage of Elimination

Last 32: +125 (bet $10 to win $22.50 total)
Last 16: +135 (bet $10 to win $23.50 total)
Quarterfinals: +600 (bet $10 to win $70 total)
Semifinals: +1600 (bet $10 to win $170 total)
Runner-up: +3000 (bet $10 to win $310 total)
Outright winner: +5000 (bet $10 to win $510 total)

Advertisement

Mexico is currently +5000 to win the 2026 FIFA World Cup after winning Group A (Getty Images).

Mexico’s Past World Cup Results:

1930: Group stage
1934: Did not qualify
1938: Withdrew
1950: Group stage
1954: Group stage
1958: Group stage
1962: Group stage
1966: Group stage
1970: Quarterfinals
1974: Did not qualify
1978: Group stage
1982: Did not qualify
1986: Quarterfinals
1990: Banned
1994: Round of 16
1998: Round of 16
2002: Round of 16
2006: Round of 16
2010: Round of 16
2014: Round of 16
2018: Round of 16
2022: Group stage
2026: TBD

What to know: Mexico has made a habit of being in the running, but never really being in the running. Make sense? Consider this: El Tri made it out of the group stage in seven consecutive World Cups (1994-2018), but never made it past the Round of 16 in any of those years. In 2022, Mexico failed to make it out of the group stage, and it will look to get back to its winning ways in 2026 after a great start to the tournament. With its win Thursday night, Mexico has now advanced to the knockout stage in eight of the last nine World Cups. It is important to note, however, that Mexico has never made it past the quarterfinals at a FIFA men’s World Cup.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending