Politics
How New York’s Mayor, Eric Adams, Wooed Donald Trump
Donald J. Trump’s electoral victory alarmed most New York Democrats — but not Eric Adams. For Mr. Adams, the mayor of New York City who had been criminally indicted and faced political isolation, it was a golden opportunity.
In the weeks before the presidential inauguration, Mr. Adams cozied up to Mr. Trump, his political allies and his family.
The mayor called the president-elect on multiple occasions, congratulating him on his election victory and discussing city affairs. He met at a luxury Manhattan hotel with Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s ally and former top aide. And he contacted the president’s second son, Eric Trump, who runs the Trump family business.
The previously unreported extent of the charm campaign was recounted in interviews with more than a dozen people knowledgeable about the effort, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the nature of the communications.
The effort culminated in Mr. Adams receiving an in-person meeting with Mr. Trump in Florida just days before the inauguration.
While Mr. Adams did not explicitly raise his corruption case at the Florida meeting, the people said, Mr. Trump appeared sympathetic to the mayor’s legal plight. The president-elect, on the verge of attaining the power to make the mayor’s case disappear, lamented that the Justice Department under President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was “weaponized.”
Mr. Adams has said that he was there on city business, and that his outreach to Mr. Trump was normal political bridge-building, irrelevant to his criminal case. A City Hall spokeswoman noted he was not the only Democrat who has sought to find some common ground with Mr. Trump.
“Mayor Adams wants to work with the new president, and not war with him, to better the lives of New Yorkers,” Liz Garcia, the city hall spokeswoman, said in a statement. “There is no difference between how the mayor has approached his relationship with President Trump and how he approached his relationship with former President Biden. Any claim that he has anything but a professional relationship with President Trump is based in falsehood.”
Yet their in-person meeting sealed a connection between the two men and was a prelude to the mayor’s lawyers formally asking the Trump administration to abandon the case.
Less than a month after their meeting, Mr. Trump’s Justice Department ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to seek a dismissal of the indictment, arguing that it hindered Mr. Adams’s cooperation with the administration’s immigration crackdown. The department also claimed the corruption case would interfere in this year’s mayoral election. It left open the possibility of reviving the charges after November.
That striking move to drop the case — which prompted several Justice Department resignations last month and a political crisis in New York — reflected a changed reality for the American justice system as the president has begun to demolish the wall between prosecution and politics.
The mayor’s case offers a blueprint for fighting criminal charges in this new, transactional era: flatter Mr. Trump, forge a personal connection and, when possible, support his agenda.
Both sides stood to gain: Mr. Adams might well have secured his freedom, while Mr. Trump gained a friend in City Hall, someone to support elements of his immigration crackdown — and, potentially, his family business.
That business, the Trump Organization, played a role in the mayor’s in-person meeting with Mr. Trump.
For one thing, the meeting was held at a Trump Organization property, a golf club in West Palm Beach, Fla. And it came about after Frank Carone, the mayor’s trusted outside adviser and former chief of staff, contacted Eric Trump, two people with knowledge of the matter said. The two men became acquainted when Mr. Carone was in City Hall in New York and the Trump Organization was operating a golf course on city land.
The Florida meeting also came as the Trump Organization was bidding on a New York City contract to operate a Central Park skating rink, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
There is no indication that the mayor’s office has advocated for the Trump Organization. But the situation is awkward nonetheless as the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation must evaluate a business owned by a family to which Mr. Adams is seemingly indebted.
Mr. Adams, his spokeswoman said, has not discussed the bid with the parks agency, which she said will follow its standard procedure.
She also disputed that Mr. Adams, who has offered mild pushback on some of the most polarizing Trump administration actions, was indebted to the president. The mayor, who has maintained his innocence, has said he never discussed his case with Mr. Trump, and has repeatedly denied that he promised anything in exchange for dropping it.
Mr. Trump, who has played down the significance of the charges, has nonetheless denied having had anything to do with his Justice Department’s abandonment of the case.
For the president, any political gain from the case disappearing might be fleeting. The appearance of a backroom deal playing out in public has damaged the mayor’s re-election prospects, potentially limiting his usefulness to the president.
Moreover, the federal judge overseeing the case might not approve the Justice Department’s plan to revisit the charges after the mayoral race.
Paul D. Clement, a prominent lawyer who the judge tasked with offering an independent recommendation on the case, warned that the arrangement could give the impression that the Trump administration was threatening the mayor with the specter of a revived case.
It could create the appearance, Mr. Clement wrote, “that the actions of a public official are being driven by concerns about staying in the good graces of the federal executive, rather than the best interests of his constituents.”
The judge has already delayed Mr. Adams’s trial, once set for April. Mr. Clement recommended that the judge dismiss the case entirely.
Building a Connection
In late October, a month after he was indicted, the mayor held a briefing for reporters ahead of Mr. Trump’s election rally at Madison Square Garden. He was asked whether he agreed with other Democrats who had called the former president a fascist.
Mr. Adams, who a few years earlier had characterized Mr. Trump as a “complete embarrassment to our nation,” leaned forward, his hands clasped in front of him. “My answer is no,” he said, adding, “I think we could all dial down the temperature.”
Mr. Trump soon won the election, and returned to New York, and the Garden, for a victory lap. This time, the event was an Ultimate Fighting Championship bout, where Mr. Adams approached the president-elect at his ringside seat, striking up a brief, friendly conversation.
Those episodes were early signs of compatibility between the two men. In subsequent months, they bonded over their views on immigration. Unlike other big city Democratic mayors, Mr. Adams has pledged to work with the president to target immigrants who have committed crimes, though local sanctuary laws have thus far prevented him from cooperating fully.
They also shared a sense of grievance against the justice system.
Last year, Mr. Trump became the first former and future president to be convicted of a crime and Mr. Adams became the first New York City mayor in modern history to be indicted.
Mr. Trump was convicted of falsifying business records related to a sex scandal. Federal prosecutors in Manhattan accused Mr. Adams of soliciting illegal foreign campaign donations and accepting thousands of dollars’ worth of travel benefits in exchange for helping Turkish officials open a new consulate building.
After Mr. Trump’s electoral victory, Mr. Adams began calling him, according to people with knowledge of the conversations. In an initial call, he congratulated Mr. Trump on his election victory and on subsequent calls discussed city business, though the people declined to elaborate on the business that was discussed. Mr. Adams did not raise his case on the calls, the people said.
In December, as their connection strengthened, Mr. Trump told reporters he would consider pardoning Mr. Adams, contending that the mayor had been treated “pretty unfairly” by federal prosecutors.
Asked about the president-elect’s comments at the time, Mr. Adams deferred to his legal team, saying, “I have an attorney that is going to look at every avenue to ensure I get justice.”
Soon after, Mr. Adams’s defense team learned of a troubling development. According to court filings, a “credible source” on Dec. 22 told Mr. Adams’s lawyer Alex Spiro that a grand jury was hearing testimony related to a potential new charge.
Around this time, Mr. Adams appears to have stepped up his outreach to Mr. Trump’s circle of supporters. That included turning to Mr. Bannon — a hard-right provocateur who was hardly a natural touch point for a Democratic mayor. But Mr. Bannon, too, had once faced charges brought by the Manhattan federal prosecutors’ office, and he had been represented by Mr. Spiro.
Weeks before the inauguration, after Mr. Spiro helped to connect them, the mayor met with Mr. Bannon at the Pierre Hotel on Fifth Avenue, according to people with knowledge of the encounter. Mr. Adams did not mention his case, one of the people said, but they discussed a potential mayoral primary against former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo.
“The mayor did not do anything differently than mayors do during administration changes,” Mr. Spiro said in an emailed statement.
Mr. Adams had other meetings with people in Mr. Trump’s orbit.
A person with knowledge of the matter said that Mr. Carone, the mayor’s political problem-solver, contacted Bruce Blakeman, a Republican and the Nassau County executive. Mr. Adams and Mr. Blakeman then dined together on Long Island in mid-January, after which the mayor said the two men had discussed “the issue of violent gangs in our region.”
In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Blakeman declined to discuss the specifics of the conversation, saying only that the men “from time to time discuss matters of regional interest.”
As the inauguration approached, the president-elect was not the only Trump family member to receive a call from the mayor. Mr. Adams also contacted Eric Trump, people with knowledge of the previously unreported call said.
It is unclear what they discussed beyond pleasantries, though the people said that Mr. Adams’s case did not come up.
The friendly call reflected a contrast with the Trump Organization’s relationship with the previous mayor, Bill de Blasio. He had sought to oust the company from its Ferry Point golf course — operated on city land in the Bronx — in the aftermath of Trump supporters’ storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
But in 2022, with Mr. Adams as mayor and Mr. Carone as his chief of staff, the city made two decisions about Ferry Point that were favorable for the Trumps.
It did not appeal a court ruling that allowed the Trump Organization to keep Ferry Point, and it approved the Trumps to host a Saudi Arabia-backed women’s golf tournament there.
Eric Trump later called Mr. Carone to express his appreciation, according to people with knowledge of the previously unreported call. Though Mr. Carone left the Adams administration by early 2023, he and Eric Trump periodically stayed in touch.
Less than a week before the presidential inauguration, Mr. Carone called Eric Trump to arrange the meeting between the mayor and the president-elect.
The younger Trump explained that he was not a formal member of his father’s political operation, but nonetheless offered to connect Mr. Carone with a scheduler for the president-elect.
By the end of that week, Mr. Adams was on his way to Florida.
A Crucial Lunch
The Trump International Golf Club West Palm Beach, the first golf course Mr. Trump acquired, is a sprawling property nestled between an airport and the ocean.
Mr. Adams and Mr. Carone arrived in time for lunch, on a cool day after Mr. Trump had finished a round of golf. Steve Witkoff, a billionaire real estate developer now serving as special envoy to the Middle East, was there, as was Eric Trump. The mayor did not bring any other city officials.
The group huddled in a roped-off corner of the dining room. They discussed the recently signed cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hamas — Mr. Witkoff had played a role in the negotiations — and areas where the Trump and Adams administrations might work together.
“To be clear, we did not discuss my legal case,” Mr. Adams said in a statement afterward. He said he had discussed the city’s priorities, adding, “I strongly believe there is much our city and the federal government can partner on to make New York City safer, stronger and more affordable.”
Three days later, Mr. Adams said he had received a last-minute invitation to the presidential inauguration from Mr. Witkoff, which he accepted “on behalf of New York City.”
Mr. Adams’s lawyers seized the momentum.
Soon after the inauguration, they sent a letter to the top White House lawyer to request that Mr. Trump pardon the mayor. And while the White House did not respond, the acting deputy attorney general, Emil Bove III, one of Mr. Trump’s former criminal defense lawyers, soon reached out to discuss potentially dropping the case.
‘He Was Always Supportive’
Mr. Adams was not the only one who wanted something.
The Trump administration sought the mayor’s support for an immigration crackdown.
And the Trump Organization wants the city’s blessing to regain control of the Wollman ice rink in Central Park, a chance to restore his name to a hometown landmark.
Wollman is a city-owned property that Mr. Trump helped refurbish in 1986 and wove into his public image as a master builder. The Trump Organization operated the rink for years, but the de Blasio administration moved to expel the company after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The Trump contract expired, and a new operator took over later that year.
The current contract expires in 2027, so the city parks agency last year solicited bids on a new 20-year deal to operate the rink. The Trump Organization and the existing operator of the rink — a consortium that includes the real estate giant Related Companies — submitted bids that the city is now evaluating, people with knowledge of the matter said.
In a statement, the parks agency said it was “currently reviewing all proposals consistent with its procedures and the terms of the solicitation.”
Even if the Trump Organization loses out on the rink, it owns several properties in the city and must interact with city agencies. As such, Trump Organization executives have privately discussed wanting to maintain friendly ties with Mr. Adams, whose term as mayor will continue through the end of the year even if he loses the Democratic primary in June.
In a radio interview last month, Eric Trump expressed his appreciation for Mr. Adams, comparing him positively with Mr. de Blasio.
“He never tried to throw our company out in New York,” Mr. Trump said of Mr. Adams. “He was always supportive of everything that we did.”
Eric Trump also argued that prosecutors had railroaded Mr. Adams after he criticized the Biden administration’s immigration policies. (In fact, the investigation into Mr. Adams began more than a year before his dispute with Mr. Biden.)
Five days after the radio interview, Mr. Bove ordered the Manhattan federal prosecutors to seek a dismissal of their case against Mr. Adams. The directive led to the resignations of at least eight prosecutors in New York and Washington, including the acting U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Danielle Sassoon.
Politics
Rubio targets Nicaraguan official over alleged torture tied to ‘brutal’ Ortega regime
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Saturday that the Trump administration is sanctioning a senior Nicaraguan official over alleged human rights violations.
Rubio said the U.S. is designating Vice Minister of the Interior Luis Roberto Cañas Novoa for his role in “gross violations of human rights” under the government of President Daniel Ortega and Vice President Rosario Murillo, marking what he said was the latest effort to hold the regime accountable.
“The Trump administration continues to hold the Murillo-Ortega dictatorship accountable for brutal human rights violations against Nicaraguans,” Rubio said in a post on X. “I’m designating Nicaraguan Vice Minister of the Interior Luis Roberto Cañas Novoa for his role in human rights violations.”
RUBIO TESTIFIES IN TRIAL OF EX-FLORIDA CONGRESSMAN ALLEGEDLY HIRED BY MADURO GOVERNMENT TO LOBBY FOR VENEZUELA
Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaks at the State Department, April 14, 2026. The U.S. announced sanctions on a Nicaraguan official tied to alleged human rights abuses under the Ortega-Murillo government. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
The designation was made under Section 7031(c), which allows the State Department to bar foreign officials and their immediate family members from entering the United States due to involvement in significant corruption or human rights abuses.
The State Department has said the Ortega-Murillo government has engaged in arbitrary arrests, torture and extrajudicial killings following mass protests that began in April 2018.
“Nearly eight years ago, the Rosario Murillo and Daniel Ortega dictatorship unleashed a brutal wave of repression against Nicaraguans who courageously stood against the regime’s increased tyranny, corruption, and abuse,” the statement reads.
The State Department said that the sanction marked the anniversary of the 2018 protests, after which more than 325 protesters were murdered in the aftermath.
A panel of U.N.-backed human rights experts previously accused Nicaragua’s government of systematic abuses “tantamount to crimes against humanity,” following an investigation into the country’s crackdown on political dissent, according to The Associated Press.
The experts said the repression intensified after mass protests in 2018 and has since expanded across large parts of society, targeting perceived opponents of the government.
TRUMP ADMIN ANNOUNCES EXPANSION OF VISA RESTRICTION POLICY IN WESTERN HEMISPHERE
Nicaragua President Daniel Ortega delivers a speech during a ceremony to mark the 199th Independence Day anniversary, in Managua, Nicaragua Sept. 15, 2020. (Nicaragua’s Presidency/Cesar Perez/Handout via Reuters)
Nicaragua’s government has rejected those findings.
The designation follows a series of recent U.S. actions targeting the Ortega-Murillo government. In February, the State Department sanctioned five senior Nicaraguan officials tied to repression, citing arbitrary detention, torture, killings and the targeting of clergy, media and civil society.
Earlier this week, the department also announced sanctions on individuals and companies linked to Nicaragua’s gold sector, including two of Ortega and Murillo’s sons, accusing the regime of using the industry to generate foreign currency, launder assets and consolidate power within the ruling family.
The State Department said the move is part of ongoing efforts to hold the Nicaraguan government accountable for its actions.
Fox News Digital reached out to the Nicaraguan government and its embassy in Washington for comment but did not immediately receive a response.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
A man waves a Nicaraguan flag during a demonstration to commemorate Nicaragua’s national Day of Peace, which is celebrated in the country on April 19, and to protest against the government of Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega in San Jose, Costa Rica on April 16, 2023. (Jose Cordero/AFP)
The Trump administration has taken an increasingly aggressive posture in the Western Hemisphere in recent months, including a Jan. 3, 2026, operation that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores.
The U.S. has also carried out a series of strikes targeting suspected drug-trafficking vessels in the region, part of a broader crackdown tied to regional security and narcotics enforcement efforts.
Politics
Outlines of a deal emerge with major concessions to Iran
WASHINGTON — Upbeat claims from President Trump over an imminent peace deal to end the war with Iran were met with deep skepticism Friday across the Middle East, where Iranian and Israeli officials questioned the prospects for a lasting agreement that would satisfy all parties.
The outlines of an agreement began to emerge that would provide Iran with a major strategic victory — and a potential financial windfall — allowing the Islamic Republic to leverage its control over the Strait of Hormuz to exact significant concessions from the United States and its ally Israel as Trump presses for a swift end to the conflict.
In a series of social media posts and interviews with reporters, Trump announced that the strait was “fully open,” vowing Tehran would never again attempt to control it. But Iranian officials and state media said that conditions remained on passage through the waterway, including the imposition of tolls and coordination with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Iranian diplomats posted threats that its closure could resume at any time of their choosing, and warned that restrictions would return unless the United States agreed to lift a blockade of its ports. Trump had said Friday that the blockade would remain in place.
“The conditional and limited reopening of a portion of the Strait of Hormuz is solely an Iranian initiative, one that creates responsibility and serves to test the firm commitments of the opposing side,” said a top aide to Iran’s president, dismissing Trump’s statements on the contours of a deal as “baseless.”
“If they renege on their promises,” he added, “they will face dire consequences.”
In an overture to Iran, Trump said Israel would be “prohibited” from conducting additional military strikes in Lebanon, where the Israeli government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seeks to prevent Hezbollah, an Iranian proxy militia, from rearming, a potential threat to communities in the Israeli north.
But in a speech delivered in Hebrew, Netanyahu would say only that Israel had agreed to a temporary ceasefire, while members of his Cabinet warned that Israel Defense Forces operations in southern Lebanon were not yet finished. A top ally of the prime minister at a right-wing Israeli news outlet warned that Trump was “surrendering” to Iran in the talks.
It was a day of public messaging from a president eager to end a war that has proved historically unpopular with the American public, and has driven a rise in gas prices that could weigh on his party entering this year’s midterm elections.
Yet, Republican allies of the president have begun warning him that an agreement skewed heavily in Tehran’s favor could carry political costs of its own.
Trump was forced to deny an Axios report Friday that his negotiating team had offered to release $20 billion in frozen Iranian assets in exchange for Tehran agreeing to hand over its fissile material, buried under rubble from a U.S. bombing raid last year.
That sum would amount to more than 10 times what President Obama released to Iran under a 2015 nuclear deal, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, that was the subject of fierce Republican criticism in the decade since.
“I have every confidence that President Trump will not allow Iran to be enriched by tens of billions of dollars for holding the world hostage and creating mayhem in the region,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a strong supporter of the war. “No JCPOAs on President Trump’s watch.”
Still, Trump said in a round of interviews that a deal could be reached in a matter of days, ending less than two weeks of negotiations.
He claimed that Tehran had agreed to permanently end its enrichment of uranium — a development that, if true, would mark a dramatic reversal for the Islamic Republic from decades developing its nuclear program, and from just 10 days ago, when Iranian diplomats rejected a U.S. proposal of a 20-year pause on domestic enrichment in favor of a five-year moratorium.
He said Iran had agreed never to build nuclear weapons — a pledge Tehran has made repeatedly, including under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, in a religious decree from then-Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and in the 2015 agreement — while continuing nuclear activities viewed by the international community as exceeding civilian needs.
And he repeatedly stated that Iran had agreed to the removal of its enriched uranium from the country, either to the United States or to a third party. Iranian state media stated Friday afternoon that a proposal to remove the country’s highly enriched uranium had been “rejected.”
Iran’s agreement to allow safe passage for commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz is linked to a ceasefire in Lebanon that the Israeli Cabinet approved for only a 10-day period. Regardless of whether it holds or is extended, Israeli officials said their military would not retreat from its current positions in southern Lebanon — opening up Israeli forces to potential attack by Hezbollah militants unbound by a truce brokered by the Lebanese government.
The Lebanese people, Hezbollah officials said, have “the right to resist” Israeli occupation of their land. Whether the fighting resumes, the group added, “will be determined based on how developments unfold.”
An Iranian official threw cold water on the prospects of reaching a comprehensive peace deal in the coming days, telling Reuters that a temporary extension of the current ceasefire, set to expire Tuesday, would “create space for more talks on lifting sanctions on Iran and securing compensation for war damages.”
“In exchange, Iran will provide assurances to the international community about the peaceful nature of its nuclear program,” the official said, adding that “any other narrative about the ongoing talks is a misrepresentation of the situation.”
Trump told reporters Friday that the talks will continue through the weekend.
While Trump claimed there aren’t “too many significant differences” remaining, he said the United States would continue the blockade until negotiations are finalized and formalized.
“When the agreement is signed, the blockade ends,” the president told reporters in Phoenix.
Times staff writer Ana Ceballos contributed to this report.
Politics
Read the Supreme Court’s Shadow Papers
CHAMBERS OF
JUSTICE ELENA KAGAN
Supreme Court of the United States Washington, D. C. 20343
February 7, 2016
Memorandum to the Conference
Re: 15A773 West Virginia, et al. v. EPA, et al.
15A776 Basin Elec. Power Cooperative, et al. v. EPA, et al. 15A787 Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. EPA, et al.
15A778 Murray Energy Corp., et al. v. EPA, et al.
-
15A793 North Dakota v. EPA, et al.
I agree with Steve that we should direct the States to seek an extension from the EPA before asking this Court to intervene. We could also include, at the end of such an order, language along the lines of the following, to encourage the D. C. Circuit to act expeditiously in its resolution of this matter: “In light of that court’s agreement to consider this case on an expedited schedule, we are confident that it will [or even: we urge it to] render a decision with appropriate dispatch.” See Doe v. Gonzales, 546 U. S. 1301, 1308 (2005) (GINSBURG, J., in chambers); Kemp v. Smith, 463 U. S. 1344, 1345 (1983) (Powell, J., in chambers); Holtzman v. Schlesinger, 414 U. S. 1304, 1305, n. 2 (1973) (Marshall, J., in chambers).
The unique nature of the relief sought in these applications gives me real pause. The applicants ask us to enjoin a regulation pending initial review in the court of appeals. As we often say, “we are a court of review, not of first view.” See Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U. S. 709, 718 n. 7 (2005); cf. Doe, 546 U. S., at 1308 (“Re- spect for the assessment of the Court of Appeals is especially warranted when that court is proceeding to adjudication on the merits with due expedition.”). As far as I can tell, it would be unprecedented for us to second-guess the D. C. Circuit’s deci sion that a stay is not warranted, without the benefit of full briefing or a prior judi- cial decision.
On the merits, this is a difficult case involving a complex statutory and regu- latory regime. Although the parties’ abbreviated discussion of the issues at stake here makes it difficult for me to determine with any confidence which side is likely to ultimately prevail, it seems to me that at this stage the government has the bet- ter of the arguments. The Chief’s memo focuses on the applicants’ argument that the “best system of emission reduction” refers “solely [to] installation of control technologies (e.g., scrubbers).” 2/5 Memo, at 2. The ordinary meaning of “system” is in fact quite broad, appearing to encompass what EPA has done here. Of course, we would want to consider this term in the larger context of the Clean Air Act’s regula-
-
Detroit, MI10 minutes agoFormer Piston shows Detroit what they’re missing as he dominates next to LeBron
-
San Francisco, CA22 minutes agoEastbound I-80 closure in San Francisco snarls traffic, slows business
-
Dallas, TX28 minutes agoPetar Musa’s Brace Not Enough as FC Dallas Draws LA Galaxy 2-2
-
Miami, FL34 minutes agoMLS: Messi double helps Inter Miami slay Rapids in front of huge crowd
-
Boston, MA40 minutes agoFrom across Boston they flock to play for Latin Academy boys’ tennis, a co-op of 29 schools – The Boston Globe
-
Denver, CO46 minutes agoDale Kistler Obituary | The Denver Post
-
Seattle, WA52 minutes agoWEST SEATTLE WEATHER: Warm day, but far below record
-
San Diego, CA58 minutes agoSolans, Luna, Guilavogui help RSL beat slumping San Diego, extend unbeaten streak to 6 games :: WRALSportsFan.com