Connect with us

Politics

How New York’s Mayor, Eric Adams, Wooed Donald Trump

Published

on

How New York’s Mayor, Eric Adams, Wooed Donald Trump

Donald J. Trump’s electoral victory alarmed most New York Democrats — but not Eric Adams. For Mr. Adams, the mayor of New York City who had been criminally indicted and faced political isolation, it was a golden opportunity.

In the weeks before the presidential inauguration, Mr. Adams cozied up to Mr. Trump, his political allies and his family.

The mayor called the president-elect on multiple occasions, congratulating him on his election victory and discussing city affairs. He met at a luxury Manhattan hotel with Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s ally and former top aide. And he contacted the president’s second son, Eric Trump, who runs the Trump family business.

The previously unreported extent of the charm campaign was recounted in interviews with more than a dozen people knowledgeable about the effort, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the nature of the communications.

The effort culminated in Mr. Adams receiving an in-person meeting with Mr. Trump in Florida just days before the inauguration.

Advertisement

While Mr. Adams did not explicitly raise his corruption case at the Florida meeting, the people said, Mr. Trump appeared sympathetic to the mayor’s legal plight. The president-elect, on the verge of attaining the power to make the mayor’s case disappear, lamented that the Justice Department under President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was “weaponized.”

Mr. Adams has said that he was there on city business, and that his outreach to Mr. Trump was normal political bridge-building, irrelevant to his criminal case. A City Hall spokeswoman noted he was not the only Democrat who has sought to find some common ground with Mr. Trump.

“Mayor Adams wants to work with the new president, and not war with him, to better the lives of New Yorkers,” Liz Garcia, the city hall spokeswoman, said in a statement. “There is no difference between how the mayor has approached his relationship with President Trump and how he approached his relationship with former President Biden. Any claim that he has anything but a professional relationship with President Trump is based in falsehood.”

Yet their in-person meeting sealed a connection between the two men and was a prelude to the mayor’s lawyers formally asking the Trump administration to abandon the case.

Less than a month after their meeting, Mr. Trump’s Justice Department ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to seek a dismissal of the indictment, arguing that it hindered Mr. Adams’s cooperation with the administration’s immigration crackdown. The department also claimed the corruption case would interfere in this year’s mayoral election. It left open the possibility of reviving the charges after November.

Advertisement

That striking move to drop the case — which prompted several Justice Department resignations last month and a political crisis in New York — reflected a changed reality for the American justice system as the president has begun to demolish the wall between prosecution and politics.

The mayor’s case offers a blueprint for fighting criminal charges in this new, transactional era: flatter Mr. Trump, forge a personal connection and, when possible, support his agenda.

Both sides stood to gain: Mr. Adams might well have secured his freedom, while Mr. Trump gained a friend in City Hall, someone to support elements of his immigration crackdown — and, potentially, his family business.

That business, the Trump Organization, played a role in the mayor’s in-person meeting with Mr. Trump.

For one thing, the meeting was held at a Trump Organization property, a golf club in West Palm Beach, Fla. And it came about after Frank Carone, the mayor’s trusted outside adviser and former chief of staff, contacted Eric Trump, two people with knowledge of the matter said. The two men became acquainted when Mr. Carone was in City Hall in New York and the Trump Organization was operating a golf course on city land.

Advertisement

The Florida meeting also came as the Trump Organization was bidding on a New York City contract to operate a Central Park skating rink, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

There is no indication that the mayor’s office has advocated for the Trump Organization. But the situation is awkward nonetheless as the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation must evaluate a business owned by a family to which Mr. Adams is seemingly indebted.

Mr. Adams, his spokeswoman said, has not discussed the bid with the parks agency, which she said will follow its standard procedure.

She also disputed that Mr. Adams, who has offered mild pushback on some of the most polarizing Trump administration actions, was indebted to the president. The mayor, who has maintained his innocence, has said he never discussed his case with Mr. Trump, and has repeatedly denied that he promised anything in exchange for dropping it.

Mr. Trump, who has played down the significance of the charges, has nonetheless denied having had anything to do with his Justice Department’s abandonment of the case.

Advertisement

For the president, any political gain from the case disappearing might be fleeting. The appearance of a backroom deal playing out in public has damaged the mayor’s re-election prospects, potentially limiting his usefulness to the president.

Moreover, the federal judge overseeing the case might not approve the Justice Department’s plan to revisit the charges after the mayoral race.

Paul D. Clement, a prominent lawyer who the judge tasked with offering an independent recommendation on the case, warned that the arrangement could give the impression that the Trump administration was threatening the mayor with the specter of a revived case.

It could create the appearance, Mr. Clement wrote, “that the actions of a public official are being driven by concerns about staying in the good graces of the federal executive, rather than the best interests of his constituents.”

The judge has already delayed Mr. Adams’s trial, once set for April. Mr. Clement recommended that the judge dismiss the case entirely.

Advertisement

In late October, a month after he was indicted, the mayor held a briefing for reporters ahead of Mr. Trump’s election rally at Madison Square Garden. He was asked whether he agreed with other Democrats who had called the former president a fascist.

Mr. Adams, who a few years earlier had characterized Mr. Trump as a “complete embarrassment to our nation,” leaned forward, his hands clasped in front of him. “My answer is no,” he said, adding, “I think we could all dial down the temperature.”

Mr. Trump soon won the election, and returned to New York, and the Garden, for a victory lap. This time, the event was an Ultimate Fighting Championship bout, where Mr. Adams approached the president-elect at his ringside seat, striking up a brief, friendly conversation.

Those episodes were early signs of compatibility between the two men. In subsequent months, they bonded over their views on immigration. Unlike other big city Democratic mayors, Mr. Adams has pledged to work with the president to target immigrants who have committed crimes, though local sanctuary laws have thus far prevented him from cooperating fully.

They also shared a sense of grievance against the justice system.

Advertisement

Last year, Mr. Trump became the first former and future president to be convicted of a crime and Mr. Adams became the first New York City mayor in modern history to be indicted.

Mr. Trump was convicted of falsifying business records related to a sex scandal. Federal prosecutors in Manhattan accused Mr. Adams of soliciting illegal foreign campaign donations and accepting thousands of dollars’ worth of travel benefits in exchange for helping Turkish officials open a new consulate building.

After Mr. Trump’s electoral victory, Mr. Adams began calling him, according to people with knowledge of the conversations. In an initial call, he congratulated Mr. Trump on his election victory and on subsequent calls discussed city business, though the people declined to elaborate on the business that was discussed. Mr. Adams did not raise his case on the calls, the people said.

In December, as their connection strengthened, Mr. Trump told reporters he would consider pardoning Mr. Adams, contending that the mayor had been treated “pretty unfairly” by federal prosecutors.

Asked about the president-elect’s comments at the time, Mr. Adams deferred to his legal team, saying, “I have an attorney that is going to look at every avenue to ensure I get justice.”

Advertisement

Soon after, Mr. Adams’s defense team learned of a troubling development. According to court filings, a “credible source” on Dec. 22 told Mr. Adams’s lawyer Alex Spiro that a grand jury was hearing testimony related to a potential new charge.

Around this time, Mr. Adams appears to have stepped up his outreach to Mr. Trump’s circle of supporters. That included turning to Mr. Bannon — a hard-right provocateur who was hardly a natural touch point for a Democratic mayor. But Mr. Bannon, too, had once faced charges brought by the Manhattan federal prosecutors’ office, and he had been represented by Mr. Spiro.

Weeks before the inauguration, after Mr. Spiro helped to connect them, the mayor met with Mr. Bannon at the Pierre Hotel on Fifth Avenue, according to people with knowledge of the encounter. Mr. Adams did not mention his case, one of the people said, but they discussed a potential mayoral primary against former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo.

“The mayor did not do anything differently than mayors do during administration changes,” Mr. Spiro said in an emailed statement.

Mr. Adams had other meetings with people in Mr. Trump’s orbit.

Advertisement

A person with knowledge of the matter said that Mr. Carone, the mayor’s political problem-solver, contacted Bruce Blakeman, a Republican and the Nassau County executive. Mr. Adams and Mr. Blakeman then dined together on Long Island in mid-January, after which the mayor said the two men had discussed “the issue of violent gangs in our region.”

In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Blakeman declined to discuss the specifics of the conversation, saying only that the men “from time to time discuss matters of regional interest.”

As the inauguration approached, the president-elect was not the only Trump family member to receive a call from the mayor. Mr. Adams also contacted Eric Trump, people with knowledge of the previously unreported call said.

It is unclear what they discussed beyond pleasantries, though the people said that Mr. Adams’s case did not come up.

The friendly call reflected a contrast with the Trump Organization’s relationship with the previous mayor, Bill de Blasio. He had sought to oust the company from its Ferry Point golf course — operated on city land in the Bronx — in the aftermath of Trump supporters’ storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Advertisement

But in 2022, with Mr. Adams as mayor and Mr. Carone as his chief of staff, the city made two decisions about Ferry Point that were favorable for the Trumps.

It did not appeal a court ruling that allowed the Trump Organization to keep Ferry Point, and it approved the Trumps to host a Saudi Arabia-backed women’s golf tournament there.

Eric Trump later called Mr. Carone to express his appreciation, according to people with knowledge of the previously unreported call. Though Mr. Carone left the Adams administration by early 2023, he and Eric Trump periodically stayed in touch.

Less than a week before the presidential inauguration, Mr. Carone called Eric Trump to arrange the meeting between the mayor and the president-elect.

The younger Trump explained that he was not a formal member of his father’s political operation, but nonetheless offered to connect Mr. Carone with a scheduler for the president-elect.

Advertisement

By the end of that week, Mr. Adams was on his way to Florida.

The Trump International Golf Club West Palm Beach, the first golf course Mr. Trump acquired, is a sprawling property nestled between an airport and the ocean.

Mr. Adams and Mr. Carone arrived in time for lunch, on a cool day after Mr. Trump had finished a round of golf. Steve Witkoff, a billionaire real estate developer now serving as special envoy to the Middle East, was there, as was Eric Trump. The mayor did not bring any other city officials.

The group huddled in a roped-off corner of the dining room. They discussed the recently signed cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hamas — Mr. Witkoff had played a role in the negotiations — and areas where the Trump and Adams administrations might work together.

“To be clear, we did not discuss my legal case,” Mr. Adams said in a statement afterward. He said he had discussed the city’s priorities, adding, “I strongly believe there is much our city and the federal government can partner on to make New York City safer, stronger and more affordable.”

Advertisement

Three days later, Mr. Adams said he had received a last-minute invitation to the presidential inauguration from Mr. Witkoff, which he accepted “on behalf of New York City.”

Mr. Adams’s lawyers seized the momentum.

Soon after the inauguration, they sent a letter to the top White House lawyer to request that Mr. Trump pardon the mayor. And while the White House did not respond, the acting deputy attorney general, Emil Bove III, one of Mr. Trump’s former criminal defense lawyers, soon reached out to discuss potentially dropping the case.

Mr. Adams was not the only one who wanted something.

The Trump administration sought the mayor’s support for an immigration crackdown.

Advertisement

And the Trump Organization wants the city’s blessing to regain control of the Wollman ice rink in Central Park, a chance to restore his name to a hometown landmark.

Wollman is a city-owned property that Mr. Trump helped refurbish in 1986 and wove into his public image as a master builder. The Trump Organization operated the rink for years, but the de Blasio administration moved to expel the company after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The Trump contract expired, and a new operator took over later that year.

The current contract expires in 2027, so the city parks agency last year solicited bids on a new 20-year deal to operate the rink. The Trump Organization and the existing operator of the rink — a consortium that includes the real estate giant Related Companies — submitted bids that the city is now evaluating, people with knowledge of the matter said.

In a statement, the parks agency said it was “currently reviewing all proposals consistent with its procedures and the terms of the solicitation.”

Even if the Trump Organization loses out on the rink, it owns several properties in the city and must interact with city agencies. As such, Trump Organization executives have privately discussed wanting to maintain friendly ties with Mr. Adams, whose term as mayor will continue through the end of the year even if he loses the Democratic primary in June.

Advertisement

In a radio interview last month, Eric Trump expressed his appreciation for Mr. Adams, comparing him positively with Mr. de Blasio.

“He never tried to throw our company out in New York,” Mr. Trump said of Mr. Adams. “He was always supportive of everything that we did.”

Eric Trump also argued that prosecutors had railroaded Mr. Adams after he criticized the Biden administration’s immigration policies. (In fact, the investigation into Mr. Adams began more than a year before his dispute with Mr. Biden.)

Five days after the radio interview, Mr. Bove ordered the Manhattan federal prosecutors to seek a dismissal of their case against Mr. Adams. The directive led to the resignations of at least eight prosecutors in New York and Washington, including the acting U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Danielle Sassoon.

Advertisement

Politics

Playing catchup to Republicans, Democrats launch ‘largest-ever’ partisan national voter registration campaign

Published

on

Playing catchup to Republicans, Democrats launch ‘largest-ever’ partisan national voter registration campaign

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Acknowledging that “we’ve been getting our butts kicked for years now by the Republicans on voter registration,” Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin on Tuesday announced the DNC will spend millions of dollars to get “back in the game.”

Martin said that the newly created “When We Count” initiative, which he described as the party’s “largest ever voter registration effort … will train hundreds of fellows throughout the country to register tens of thousands of new voters in communities across the country.”

The announcement by the DNC, in what Martin called an “all hands on deck moment,” comes in the wake of massive voter registration gains by Republicans in recent years and ahead of November’s midterms, when Democrats aim to win back majorities in the House and Senate and a whopping 36 states hold elections for governor.

“For too long, Democrats have ceded ground to Republicans on registering voters,” Martin pointed out. “Between 2020 and ’24 alone, our party lost a combined 2.1 million registered voters. Meanwhile, Republicans gained 2.4 million voters.”

Advertisement

GOP OVERTAKES DEMOCRATS ON VOTER ROLLS IN KEY SWING STATE AFTER YEARS OF DEM DOMINANCE

Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin addresses party members at the DNC’s summer meeting, on Aug. 25, 2025, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

The latest example is North Carolina, where new State Board of Elections data indicated that Republicans officially surpassed Democrats in voter registration for the first time in the crucial southeastern battleground state’s history.

Martin said a key reason for the Democrats’ deficit is that “Republicans have invested heavily in targeted partisan registration” to mobilize and grow their base of voters.

TRUMP TOUTS NEW INFLATION NUMBERS AS AFFORDABILITY ISSUE FRONT AND CENTER AHEAD OF MIDTERMS

Advertisement

But he lamented that “on the left” voter registration for decades has largely been led by nonpartisan advocacy organizations and civic “which limits their ability to engage in partisan conversations about registering as a Democrat.”

Martin said the new effort “is going to require everyone,” including the national, state and local parties, as well as outside groups and political campaigns, “participating in this critical work.”

Pointing to the sweeping ballot box successes by President Donald Trump and the GOP in the 2024 elections, when Republicans won back the White House and Senate and held onto their House majority, Martin said “we can’t just assume that certain demographics, whether they be young voters, voters of color or otherwise, will automatically support the Democratic Party. We have to earn every registration so that we can earn every vote.”

The DNC’s seven-figure initiative, which Martin said would kick off in the western battleground states of Arizona and Nevada, “puts our national party and local parties back in the game. When we count, we’ll begin to chip away at the Republican advantage as we prepare to organize everywhere and win everywhere in 2026.”

The Democratic National Committee announced on Tuesday it will spend millions to shift its voter registration strategy ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. (Melissa Sue Gerrits/Getty Images)

Advertisement

The DNC, as it ramps up to this year’s midterm elections, also faces a formidable fundraising deficit compared to the rival Republican National Committee (RNC).

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

RNC Communications Director Zach Parkinson, pointing to the DNC’s campaign cash problems, charged in a statement to Fox News Digital that “Ken Martin has driven the DNC into debt, overseen anemic fundraising.”

“We at the RNC think he’s the perfect person to oversee Democrats voter registration efforts,” Parkinson added, in a shot at the DNC chair.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

House Democrats challenge new Homeland Security order limiting lawmaker visits to immigration facilities

Published

on

House Democrats challenge new Homeland Security order limiting lawmaker visits to immigration facilities

Twelve House Democrats who last year sued the Trump administration over a policy limiting congressional oversight of immigrant detention facilities returned to federal court Monday to challenge a second, new policy imposing further limits on such unannounced visits.

In December, those members of Congress won their lawsuit challenging a Department of Homeland Security policy from June that required a week’s notice from lawmakers before an oversight visit. Now they’re accusing Homeland Security of having “secretly reimposed” the requirement last week.

In a Jan. 8 memorandum, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote that “Facility visit requests must be made a minimum of seven (7) calendar days in advance. Any requests to shorten that time must be approved by me.”

The lawmakers who challenged the policies are led by Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) and include five members from California: Reps. Robert Garcia (D-Long Beach), Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana), Jimmy Gomez (D-Los Angeles), Raul Ruiz (D-Indio) and Norma Torres (D-Pomona).

Advertisement

Last summer, as immigration raids spread through Los Angeles and other parts of Southern California, many Democrats including those named in the lawsuit were denied entry to local detention facilities. Before then, unannounced inspections had been a common, long-standing practice under congressional oversight powers.

“The duplicate notice policy is a transparent attempt by DHS to again subvert Congress’s will…and this Court’s stay of DHS’s oversight visit policy,” the plaintiffs wrote in a federal court motion Monday requesting an emergency hearing.

On Saturday, three days after Renee Nicole Good was shot and killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent, three members of Congress from Minnesota attempted to conduct an oversight visit of an ICE facility near Minneapolis. They were denied access.

Afterward, lawyers for Homeland Security notified the lawmakers and the court of the new policy, according to the court filing.

In a joint statement, the plaintiffs wrote that “rather than complying with the law, the Department of Homeland Security is attempting to get around this order by re-imposing the same unlawful policy.”

Advertisement

“This is unacceptable,” they said. “Oversight is a core responsibility of Members of Congress, and a constitutional duty we do not take lightly. It is not something the executive branch can turn on or off at will.”

Congress has stipulated in yearly appropriations packages since 2020 that funds may not be used to prevent a member of Congress “from entering, for the purpose of conducting oversight, any facility operated by or for the Department of Homeland Security used to detain or otherwise house aliens.”

That language formed the basis of the decision last month by U.S. District Court Judge Jia Cobb in Washington, who found that lawmakers cannot be denied entry for visits “unless and until” the government could show that no appropriations money was being used to operate detention facilities.

In her policy memorandum, Noem wrote that funds from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which supplied roughly $170 billion toward immigration and border enforcement, are not subject to the limitations of the yearly appropriations law.

“ICE must ensure that this policy is implemented and enforced exclusively with money appropriated by OBBBA,” Noem said.

Advertisement

Noem said the new policy is justified because unannounced visits pull ICE officers away from their normal duties. “Moreover, there is an increasing trend of replacing legitimate oversight activities with circus-like publicity stunts, all of which creates a chaotic environment with heightened emotions,” she wrote.

The lawmakers, in the court filing, argued it’s clear that the new policy violates the law.

“It is practically impossible that the development, promulgation, communication, and implementation of this policy has been, and will be, accomplished — as required — without using a single dollar of annually appropriated funds,” they wrote.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Video: Minnesota and Illinois Sue Trump Administration Over ICE Deployments

Published

on

Video: Minnesota and Illinois Sue Trump Administration Over ICE Deployments

new video loaded: Minnesota and Illinois Sue Trump Administration Over ICE Deployments

transcript

transcript

Minnesota and Illinois Sue Trump Administration Over ICE Deployments

Minnesota and Illinois filed federal lawsuits against the Trump administration, claiming that the deployment of immigration agents to the Minneapolis and Chicago areas violated states’ rights.

This is, in essence, a federal invasion of the Twin Cities and Minnesota, and it must stop. We ask the courts to end the D.H.S. unlawful behavior in our state. The intimidation, the threats, the violence. We ask the courts to end the tactics on our places of worship, our schools, our courts, our marketplaces, our hospitals and even funeral homes.

Advertisement
Minnesota and Illinois filed federal lawsuits against the Trump administration, claiming that the deployment of immigration agents to the Minneapolis and Chicago areas violated states’ rights.

By Jackeline Luna

January 12, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending