Politics
How New York’s Mayor, Eric Adams, Wooed Donald Trump
Donald J. Trump’s electoral victory alarmed most New York Democrats — but not Eric Adams. For Mr. Adams, the mayor of New York City who had been criminally indicted and faced political isolation, it was a golden opportunity.
In the weeks before the presidential inauguration, Mr. Adams cozied up to Mr. Trump, his political allies and his family.
The mayor called the president-elect on multiple occasions, congratulating him on his election victory and discussing city affairs. He met at a luxury Manhattan hotel with Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s ally and former top aide. And he contacted the president’s second son, Eric Trump, who runs the Trump family business.
The previously unreported extent of the charm campaign was recounted in interviews with more than a dozen people knowledgeable about the effort, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the nature of the communications.
The effort culminated in Mr. Adams receiving an in-person meeting with Mr. Trump in Florida just days before the inauguration.
While Mr. Adams did not explicitly raise his corruption case at the Florida meeting, the people said, Mr. Trump appeared sympathetic to the mayor’s legal plight. The president-elect, on the verge of attaining the power to make the mayor’s case disappear, lamented that the Justice Department under President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was “weaponized.”
Mr. Adams has said that he was there on city business, and that his outreach to Mr. Trump was normal political bridge-building, irrelevant to his criminal case. A City Hall spokeswoman noted he was not the only Democrat who has sought to find some common ground with Mr. Trump.
“Mayor Adams wants to work with the new president, and not war with him, to better the lives of New Yorkers,” Liz Garcia, the city hall spokeswoman, said in a statement. “There is no difference between how the mayor has approached his relationship with President Trump and how he approached his relationship with former President Biden. Any claim that he has anything but a professional relationship with President Trump is based in falsehood.”
Yet their in-person meeting sealed a connection between the two men and was a prelude to the mayor’s lawyers formally asking the Trump administration to abandon the case.
Less than a month after their meeting, Mr. Trump’s Justice Department ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to seek a dismissal of the indictment, arguing that it hindered Mr. Adams’s cooperation with the administration’s immigration crackdown. The department also claimed the corruption case would interfere in this year’s mayoral election. It left open the possibility of reviving the charges after November.
That striking move to drop the case — which prompted several Justice Department resignations last month and a political crisis in New York — reflected a changed reality for the American justice system as the president has begun to demolish the wall between prosecution and politics.
The mayor’s case offers a blueprint for fighting criminal charges in this new, transactional era: flatter Mr. Trump, forge a personal connection and, when possible, support his agenda.
Both sides stood to gain: Mr. Adams might well have secured his freedom, while Mr. Trump gained a friend in City Hall, someone to support elements of his immigration crackdown — and, potentially, his family business.
That business, the Trump Organization, played a role in the mayor’s in-person meeting with Mr. Trump.
For one thing, the meeting was held at a Trump Organization property, a golf club in West Palm Beach, Fla. And it came about after Frank Carone, the mayor’s trusted outside adviser and former chief of staff, contacted Eric Trump, two people with knowledge of the matter said. The two men became acquainted when Mr. Carone was in City Hall in New York and the Trump Organization was operating a golf course on city land.
The Florida meeting also came as the Trump Organization was bidding on a New York City contract to operate a Central Park skating rink, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
There is no indication that the mayor’s office has advocated for the Trump Organization. But the situation is awkward nonetheless as the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation must evaluate a business owned by a family to which Mr. Adams is seemingly indebted.
Mr. Adams, his spokeswoman said, has not discussed the bid with the parks agency, which she said will follow its standard procedure.
She also disputed that Mr. Adams, who has offered mild pushback on some of the most polarizing Trump administration actions, was indebted to the president. The mayor, who has maintained his innocence, has said he never discussed his case with Mr. Trump, and has repeatedly denied that he promised anything in exchange for dropping it.
Mr. Trump, who has played down the significance of the charges, has nonetheless denied having had anything to do with his Justice Department’s abandonment of the case.
For the president, any political gain from the case disappearing might be fleeting. The appearance of a backroom deal playing out in public has damaged the mayor’s re-election prospects, potentially limiting his usefulness to the president.
Moreover, the federal judge overseeing the case might not approve the Justice Department’s plan to revisit the charges after the mayoral race.
Paul D. Clement, a prominent lawyer who the judge tasked with offering an independent recommendation on the case, warned that the arrangement could give the impression that the Trump administration was threatening the mayor with the specter of a revived case.
It could create the appearance, Mr. Clement wrote, “that the actions of a public official are being driven by concerns about staying in the good graces of the federal executive, rather than the best interests of his constituents.”
The judge has already delayed Mr. Adams’s trial, once set for April. Mr. Clement recommended that the judge dismiss the case entirely.
Building a Connection
In late October, a month after he was indicted, the mayor held a briefing for reporters ahead of Mr. Trump’s election rally at Madison Square Garden. He was asked whether he agreed with other Democrats who had called the former president a fascist.
Mr. Adams, who a few years earlier had characterized Mr. Trump as a “complete embarrassment to our nation,” leaned forward, his hands clasped in front of him. “My answer is no,” he said, adding, “I think we could all dial down the temperature.”
Mr. Trump soon won the election, and returned to New York, and the Garden, for a victory lap. This time, the event was an Ultimate Fighting Championship bout, where Mr. Adams approached the president-elect at his ringside seat, striking up a brief, friendly conversation.
Those episodes were early signs of compatibility between the two men. In subsequent months, they bonded over their views on immigration. Unlike other big city Democratic mayors, Mr. Adams has pledged to work with the president to target immigrants who have committed crimes, though local sanctuary laws have thus far prevented him from cooperating fully.
They also shared a sense of grievance against the justice system.
Last year, Mr. Trump became the first former and future president to be convicted of a crime and Mr. Adams became the first New York City mayor in modern history to be indicted.
Mr. Trump was convicted of falsifying business records related to a sex scandal. Federal prosecutors in Manhattan accused Mr. Adams of soliciting illegal foreign campaign donations and accepting thousands of dollars’ worth of travel benefits in exchange for helping Turkish officials open a new consulate building.
After Mr. Trump’s electoral victory, Mr. Adams began calling him, according to people with knowledge of the conversations. In an initial call, he congratulated Mr. Trump on his election victory and on subsequent calls discussed city business, though the people declined to elaborate on the business that was discussed. Mr. Adams did not raise his case on the calls, the people said.
In December, as their connection strengthened, Mr. Trump told reporters he would consider pardoning Mr. Adams, contending that the mayor had been treated “pretty unfairly” by federal prosecutors.
Asked about the president-elect’s comments at the time, Mr. Adams deferred to his legal team, saying, “I have an attorney that is going to look at every avenue to ensure I get justice.”
Soon after, Mr. Adams’s defense team learned of a troubling development. According to court filings, a “credible source” on Dec. 22 told Mr. Adams’s lawyer Alex Spiro that a grand jury was hearing testimony related to a potential new charge.
Around this time, Mr. Adams appears to have stepped up his outreach to Mr. Trump’s circle of supporters. That included turning to Mr. Bannon — a hard-right provocateur who was hardly a natural touch point for a Democratic mayor. But Mr. Bannon, too, had once faced charges brought by the Manhattan federal prosecutors’ office, and he had been represented by Mr. Spiro.
Weeks before the inauguration, after Mr. Spiro helped to connect them, the mayor met with Mr. Bannon at the Pierre Hotel on Fifth Avenue, according to people with knowledge of the encounter. Mr. Adams did not mention his case, one of the people said, but they discussed a potential mayoral primary against former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo.
“The mayor did not do anything differently than mayors do during administration changes,” Mr. Spiro said in an emailed statement.
Mr. Adams had other meetings with people in Mr. Trump’s orbit.
A person with knowledge of the matter said that Mr. Carone, the mayor’s political problem-solver, contacted Bruce Blakeman, a Republican and the Nassau County executive. Mr. Adams and Mr. Blakeman then dined together on Long Island in mid-January, after which the mayor said the two men had discussed “the issue of violent gangs in our region.”
In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Blakeman declined to discuss the specifics of the conversation, saying only that the men “from time to time discuss matters of regional interest.”
As the inauguration approached, the president-elect was not the only Trump family member to receive a call from the mayor. Mr. Adams also contacted Eric Trump, people with knowledge of the previously unreported call said.
It is unclear what they discussed beyond pleasantries, though the people said that Mr. Adams’s case did not come up.
The friendly call reflected a contrast with the Trump Organization’s relationship with the previous mayor, Bill de Blasio. He had sought to oust the company from its Ferry Point golf course — operated on city land in the Bronx — in the aftermath of Trump supporters’ storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
But in 2022, with Mr. Adams as mayor and Mr. Carone as his chief of staff, the city made two decisions about Ferry Point that were favorable for the Trumps.
It did not appeal a court ruling that allowed the Trump Organization to keep Ferry Point, and it approved the Trumps to host a Saudi Arabia-backed women’s golf tournament there.
Eric Trump later called Mr. Carone to express his appreciation, according to people with knowledge of the previously unreported call. Though Mr. Carone left the Adams administration by early 2023, he and Eric Trump periodically stayed in touch.
Less than a week before the presidential inauguration, Mr. Carone called Eric Trump to arrange the meeting between the mayor and the president-elect.
The younger Trump explained that he was not a formal member of his father’s political operation, but nonetheless offered to connect Mr. Carone with a scheduler for the president-elect.
By the end of that week, Mr. Adams was on his way to Florida.
A Crucial Lunch
The Trump International Golf Club West Palm Beach, the first golf course Mr. Trump acquired, is a sprawling property nestled between an airport and the ocean.
Mr. Adams and Mr. Carone arrived in time for lunch, on a cool day after Mr. Trump had finished a round of golf. Steve Witkoff, a billionaire real estate developer now serving as special envoy to the Middle East, was there, as was Eric Trump. The mayor did not bring any other city officials.
The group huddled in a roped-off corner of the dining room. They discussed the recently signed cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hamas — Mr. Witkoff had played a role in the negotiations — and areas where the Trump and Adams administrations might work together.
“To be clear, we did not discuss my legal case,” Mr. Adams said in a statement afterward. He said he had discussed the city’s priorities, adding, “I strongly believe there is much our city and the federal government can partner on to make New York City safer, stronger and more affordable.”
Three days later, Mr. Adams said he had received a last-minute invitation to the presidential inauguration from Mr. Witkoff, which he accepted “on behalf of New York City.”
Mr. Adams’s lawyers seized the momentum.
Soon after the inauguration, they sent a letter to the top White House lawyer to request that Mr. Trump pardon the mayor. And while the White House did not respond, the acting deputy attorney general, Emil Bove III, one of Mr. Trump’s former criminal defense lawyers, soon reached out to discuss potentially dropping the case.
‘He Was Always Supportive’
Mr. Adams was not the only one who wanted something.
The Trump administration sought the mayor’s support for an immigration crackdown.
And the Trump Organization wants the city’s blessing to regain control of the Wollman ice rink in Central Park, a chance to restore his name to a hometown landmark.
Wollman is a city-owned property that Mr. Trump helped refurbish in 1986 and wove into his public image as a master builder. The Trump Organization operated the rink for years, but the de Blasio administration moved to expel the company after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The Trump contract expired, and a new operator took over later that year.
The current contract expires in 2027, so the city parks agency last year solicited bids on a new 20-year deal to operate the rink. The Trump Organization and the existing operator of the rink — a consortium that includes the real estate giant Related Companies — submitted bids that the city is now evaluating, people with knowledge of the matter said.
In a statement, the parks agency said it was “currently reviewing all proposals consistent with its procedures and the terms of the solicitation.”
Even if the Trump Organization loses out on the rink, it owns several properties in the city and must interact with city agencies. As such, Trump Organization executives have privately discussed wanting to maintain friendly ties with Mr. Adams, whose term as mayor will continue through the end of the year even if he loses the Democratic primary in June.
In a radio interview last month, Eric Trump expressed his appreciation for Mr. Adams, comparing him positively with Mr. de Blasio.
“He never tried to throw our company out in New York,” Mr. Trump said of Mr. Adams. “He was always supportive of everything that we did.”
Eric Trump also argued that prosecutors had railroaded Mr. Adams after he criticized the Biden administration’s immigration policies. (In fact, the investigation into Mr. Adams began more than a year before his dispute with Mr. Biden.)
Five days after the radio interview, Mr. Bove ordered the Manhattan federal prosecutors to seek a dismissal of their case against Mr. Adams. The directive led to the resignations of at least eight prosecutors in New York and Washington, including the acting U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Danielle Sassoon.
Politics
Omar’s disclosures erased millions, leaving her with potential negative net worth. She won’t explain why.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., refused to address her revised financial disclosures that could imply she has a negative net worth after the progressive lawmaker dramatically reducing the reported value of assets tied to her husband’s business ventures.
“Can you tell us if your husband still has the consulting business and the wine business?” Fox News Digital asked Omar.
The congresswoman stayed silent as she was repeatedly questioned, after previously telling Fox News Digital that the original filing — showing Omar’s reported assets reducing by as much as $29.9 million — was inaccurate and “incomplete” information.
ILHAN OMAR’S OFFICE SAYS SHE’S ‘NOT A MILLIONAIRE’ AFTER $30M FILING REVISED DOWN TO UNDER $100K: REPORT
US Representative Ilhan Omar, Democrat of Minnesota, speaks during a press conference with family members of Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh as members of Congress call for US investigations into Israel’s actions and reintroduce the Justice for Shireen Act, outside the US Capitol in Washington, DC, May 18, 2023. The Al Jazeera journalist, who was a dual US citizen, was killed on May 11, 2022. The Israeli army later admitted one of its soldiers likely shot the reporter. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)
The controversy surrounding Omar’s finances began when a 2024 financial report estimated that Omar and her husband possessed between $6 million and $30 million in assets, all while the Minnesota fraud scandal within the Somali community was beginning to come to fruition.
A more recent 2025 financial disclosure report shows Omar’s revised value of shared assets between her and husband to sit at a maximum of $125,000 — a multi-million-dollar drop from the year prior. The lower estimate of their assets, $20,000, compared to the low and high debt estimates, $30,000 and $100,000, would imply the Minnesota Democrat could have a negative net worth.
Both her and her husband have separate debts, each ranging somewhere between $15,000 and $50,000 — from her own student loans and her husband’s credit card debt, according to the disclosures.
WATCH: OMAR SILENT WHEN CONFRONTED ON ALLEGED TIES TO MASSIVE MINNESOTA FRAUD SCANDAL
RICHFIELD, MN – AUGUST 08: Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (C) campaigns with her husband Tim Mynett (R) at the Richfield Farmers Market on August 8, 2020 in Richfield, Minnesota. Omar is hoping to retain her seat as the representative for Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District in next week’s primary election. (Photo by Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)
The biggest change in the documents involved Omar’s husband, Tim Mynett. His reported ownership interests in both his winery and venture capital advisory firm, which were previously valued in the millions of dollars, are listed with no value now.
In Omar’s 2024 financial disclosure records, Mynett’s share in his winery was valued between $1 million and $5 million, and his share at the venture capital advisory firm was valued between $5 million and $25 million. Now, his equity interests are both listed at $0.
Omar’s office previously told Fox News Digital that Mynett has partners in both businesses and said the earlier disclosure mistakenly reflected the businesses’ total equity rather than his ownership interest. The office also said the original filing listed assets without accounting for liabilities.
VANCE REFERS TIM WALZ, MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL TO DOJ FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OVER STATE’S ALLEGED FRAUD
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., has publicly voiced his interest in the Ethics Committee opening an investigation into Omar’s personal finances after the 2025 financial reports came out showing the possibility of a $29 million drop in her net worth.
Vice President JD Vance also has previously said the U.S. Department of Justice will be opening a probe into her alleged fraud as part of the administration’s anti-fraud taskforce that he spearheads, though no formal investigations have been shared with the public at this time.
Omar has been reluctant to answer Fox News Digital’s questions about her financial fallout and potential probes to be opened against her.
The Minnesota lawmaker similarly dodged answering any of Fox News Digital’s questions just last month about the revised disclosures.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“There’s also the possibility that it might rain on this sunny day,” Omar replied without responding directly to the content of the question.
Fox News Digital’s Robert Schmad contributed to this report.
Politics
Column: Trump decries ‘communism’ while his government takes ownership of companies
As a student years ago, I dove deep into the history of the Red-hunting McCarthy era and became familiar with the actor who emerged second only to Wisconsin Sen. Joe McCarthy as the villain of that insidious time: his shameless, conniving young lawyer, Roy Cohn. Never would I have imagined that a future president would count Cohn as a mentor and role model.
Then came Donald Trump.
Now, in Cohn-inflected McCarthyesque style, President Trump is channeling his tutor yet again, baselessly labeling his political enemies — all Democrats — as communists as he looks ahead to the fall’s midterm elections. Once more Trump shows that his catchphrase “Make America great again” means regressing, this time to Trump’s formative 1950s and the McCarthy era that sadly helped define it.
In recent speeches, including on the Fourth of July, Trump’s utterances of “communist” or “communism” reached double digits each time. (As that implies, the president didn’t set aside his divisive rhetoric even for the nation’s 250th birthday.)
“Our warriors did not fight communism on battlefields across the world only to have that menace rear its ugly head right back here in America,” Trump said late on the Fourth on the National Mall.
Trump couples his commie-baiting with a dash of his trademark xenophobia. “There is now a resurgence of the communist menace in our land, including by newcomers to our country who embrace ideas totally opposed to our way of life and our great success,” he said at Mount Rushmore a day earlier. (He’s got it backward, of course: Immigrants come here for the American way of life and promise of success.)
Here’s the irony: Trump’s actions in his second term make him look more like the commie. He’s projecting again.
Now that Trump is exploiting a few victories lately by left-wing democratic socialists in Democratic primaries to paint the entire party as communists, it’s time to review the record — his record.
A hallmark of communism is government ownership of companies and control of the economy, at the expense of private property and free markets. In just over a year, Trump has used billions of taxpayers’ dollars to buy shares for the government in a growing list of private companies — U.S. Steel, Intel, Westinghouse and more — citing national security. The companies don’t always welcome their new stakeholder; at a minimum, they rightly fear it for the demands the government could make about prices and production.
“It’s what Putin did,” the estranged Republicans at the Lincoln Project posted online Monday. “Trump is the closest we’ve ever come to communism.”
“What began as a populist revolt against so-called elites has become a program of state ownership, price fixing and top-down industrial control,” free-market economist Veronique de Rugy wrote in The Times last October of Trump’s actions. “The power to ‘partner’ with business is the power to control it.”
Comrade Trump’s first big government grab, and a model for those to come, was in June last year, when he wrested a permanent “golden share” in U.S. Steel in return for approving its sale to Japan’s Nippon Steel. The company’s charter was revised to give the U.S. president extraordinary veto power over nearly a dozen corporate activities, including closing or relocating plants, supply-chain decisions, even pricing.
“We have a golden share, which I control,” Trump told reporters at the time, in words I never thought I’d hear from a president of the party once associated with free markets.
Just last week, Trump boasted to CNBC how he’d extracted a 10% stake in beleaguered chip giant Intel last August, after first demanding that its chief executive resign. “Intel came in. They had a problem. I said, ‘I can solve your problem, but I want 10% of the company.’ … Somebody said that’s not very American. I said, ‘No, I think it is very American, actually.’ And I’ve done that with other deals.”
And so he has.
The Pentagon is now the largest stockholder in struggling MP Materials, a large rare-earth mine in California, and guarantees a 10-year price floor for its output that stunned competitors. The administration has since taken shares in other rare-earth companies. The Commerce Department took an option for an 8% stake in Westinghouse, to spur construction of nuclear reactors, and has the right to 20% if the government decides the company should go public. The government takes a 15% cut of Nvidia’s and Advanced Micro Devices’ AI chip sales to China.
As much as anything he does, Trump’s direct intervention in private enterprise invites the question “What if Biden/Harris/Obama did that?” The answer, of course: Trump and Republicans would cry “Communist!”
Trump’s actions are the sort Americans generally have only seen during economic emergencies or major wars, and then rarely. I covered the frenzied and ultimately successful response to the near-collapse of the global financial system and the U.S. auto, insurance and housing industries. Behind the scenes in the Obama White House (and George W. Bush’s at the outset) was constant, angst-filled debate about any actions smacking of government takeovers and a determination that interventions be temporary, unlike Trump’s schemes. (For all the still-lingering unpopularity of the banking bailout, the Treasury — the taxpayers — got all the money back and then some, and exited the business.)
Trump’s economic big-footing isn’t the only way in which he resembles the commies Americans know best, and whom he so admires: Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Kim Jung Un. There are also the images of himself everywhere, monuments planned, drearily long and self-adulating speeches and interference in the nation’s cultural, educational and legal spheres and — worst of all — in elections.
At Rushmore, Trump closed with a demand that Congress pass his so-called SAVE America Act to restrict voting. “We do that and we’re not going to lose an election for 100 years,” he said, speaking of course about Republicans.
One-party rule through central government election finagling? Now that’s a communist.
Bluesky: @jackiecalmes
Threads: @jkcalmes
X: @jackiekcalmes
Politics
Who is Valli Geiger? Meet the Maine Dem that Platner urged to run for Senate
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Maine state Rep. Valli Geiger, a Rockland Democrat, former nurse and former mayor, is drawing sudden national attention after saying now-former Democratic Senate nominee Graham Platner encouraged her to consider taking his place on the ballot in the Maine Senate race.
While Geiger has not been named the replacement nominee, her name entered the Maine Senate scramble after she told local outlet WMTW that Platner called her Monday night, praised her as a “fighter” and asked whether he could put her name forward. Platner’s campaign told the outlet he had not made an endorsement decision but confirmed he encouraged Geiger to consider running if he stepped aside.
After Geiger said Platner called her about potentially putting her name forward, Geiger posted Tuesday she would not “throw Graham under the bus,” while also saying she would not “slander or accuse” Jenny Racicot, the woman who accused Platner of rape, “of anything more than telling the truth as she experienced it.”
By Wednesday, local outlets were reporting that Geiger said Platner had encouraged her to consider running if he withdrew. Platner, who suspended his campaign Wednesday night, has denied the claim.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT IF PLATNER DROPS OUT? HERE’S WHO COULD REPLACE HIM ON THE BALLOT AND HOW IT COULD WORK
Graham Platner Maine State Rep. Valli Geiger (Maine State Legislature/Getty Images)
“For the movement to continue, it can’t be me. For that reason, we are suspending campaign operations,” Platner said in a video posted to social media.
Geiger is a third-term Democratic state representative from Rockland, according to her legislative biography, representing a coastal House district in Maine that includes Rockland, Criehaven Township, Matinicus Isle Plantation, the Muscle Ridge Islands, North Haven and part of Owls Head. Her biography says she serves on the Labor Committee and the Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee.
Before entering the state legislature, Geiger served six years on the Rockland City Council, including one year as mayor and four years on the Rockland Comprehensive Planning Commission, three of them as chair.
Her biography says she holds a master’s degree in sustainable design and built her own passive-solar, net-zero-energy house. It also describes her as a former nurse at Pen Bay Medical Center who later worked as a health policy analyst and health administrator, including as director of the Healthreach Hospice program and clinical director for Federally Qualified Health Centers around Maine.
The Maine State Capitol May 18, 2026, in Augusta, Maine. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
PLATNER CAMPAIGN PUTTING ‘THUMB ON SCALE’ TO INFLUENCE POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT, MAINE DEM ALLEGES
Geiger’s connection to Platner predates the latest replacement speculation. Local reporting has described her as a close Platner supporter, and WMTW reported she previously stood with him and credited him with helping secure funding for rape kit tracking in Maine.
In her Facebook post responding to Racicot’s allegation, Geiger wrote that Racicot’s story “seems credible” but added that “none of us knows the truth nor will we ever.” She also described Platner as “a man becoming a better man” and said she had hoped he would lead the political movement his campaign had built and will not “throw Graham under the bus.”
In the post, Geiger also praised Platner’s “passion for economic populism” and said she had granted him “an enormous amount of grace” for his behavior during what she described as his “dark years” after multiple deployments.
Dr. Nirav D. Shah, director of the Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention, speaks during a news conference about COVID-19 at Maine Emergency Management Agency in Augusta. (Derek Davis/Portland Press Herald via Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The Maine state representative is not the only Democrat whose name has surfaced as Maine Democrats prepare for the possibility that Platner exits the race against Republican Sen. Susan Collins.
Several Democrats have expressed interest or are considering bids, including former gubernatorial candidate Troy Jackson, Secretary of State Shenna Bellows and former Maine CDC Director Nirav Shah.
Under Maine law, the Maine Democratic Party can replace him on the general election ballot by selecting a new nominee through its party process, with the replacement required to be chosen by July 27.
Fox News Digital’s Andrew Mark Miller and Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.
-
New Hampshire29 seconds agoTrans athletes drop lawsuit to gain access to girls’ sports in New Hampshire after SCOTUS ruling
-
New Jersey6 minutes agoFamily describes frantic moments delivering baby on the NJ Turnpike
-
New Mexico13 minutes ago
Hidden gem in Cloudcroft, New Mexico has best BBQ in US
-
North Carolina16 minutes agoNorth Carolina Airport Looks to Expand Commercial Service | AirlineGeeks.com
-
North Dakota21 minutes agoSan Francisco plots risky socialist bank modeled after controversial experiment
-
Ohio28 minutes ago
Feeling itchy? Ohio leads nation with 6 cities on Orkin’s 2026 bed bug list
-
Oklahoma31 minutes agoOklahoma’s Brent Venables named to 2026 Dodd Trophy Preseason watch list
-
Oregon36 minutes agoRyan Reynolds-backed Aviation Gin shutters Oregon distillery