Connect with us

News

‘Not for the faint of heart’: Private equity’s last retail barbarian

Published

on

‘Not for the faint of heart’: Private equity’s last retail barbarian

Ailing retailers like Walgreens Boots Alliance have scared off even the most daring Wall Street financiers. But that fear has repeatedly proven an opportunity for Sycamore Partners’ Stefan Kaluzny.

The intensely secretive co-founder of the private equity firm has been able to make big bets that Americans are not done with malls and in-person shopping, with few rivals daring to circle.

This week Sycamore, which has sucked up waning brands such as Staples, Talbots and Ann Taylor despite managing only about $10bn, announced its biggest deal yet: a $23.7bn transaction to take Walgreens private.

The buyout firm now has to revive a business ravaged by declining prescription drug reimbursements and ecommerce, with 12,500 outlets spanning the US, Europe and Latin America, under brands including Walgreens, Boots, Duane Reade and Benavides. Many peers see the stores as unsalvageable.

“It’s not for the faint of heart,” one lawyer who has worked with Sycamore said of leveraged buyouts in the retail sector. “Oftentimes these deals have less competition because [they’re] going where other people won’t touch with a 10-foot pole.”

Advertisement
Sycamore co-founder Stefan Kaluzny has refined his technique over 14 years of buyouts © Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images/AAFA American Image Awards

Kaluzny’s well-worn playbook starts with the intricate dossiers Sycamore maintains on hundreds of US retail chains, one Wall Street veteran recalled.

The next step is achieving a modest purchase price. Sycamore has developed a reputation for bargaining hard right up until signing. In some cases — the $6.9bn deal for office supplies chain Staples, for example — Sycamore has even pulled off price chips after reaching a handshake on the terms, according to securities filings and deal insiders.

After landing a deal, Sycamore makes aggressive plans to get its equity investment back quickly by breaking up a target or selling off real estate to generate immediate cash proceeds.

With Staples, Kaluzny rapidly separated the consumer chain that had been battered by Amazon from the business-to-business segment, and sold the company’s headquarters to itself so that it could then collect lease payments. The result: a $1bn dividend within a few years.

“Sycamore is willing . . . to get their hands dirty,” one person involved in the Walgreens buyout said.

Advertisement

The firm’s success had less to do with “brilliant operational moves” than the fact they were “not sentimental” and were willing to shut down or liquidate business lines quickly, the person said. “They’re willing to play hardball.”

Sycamore and Kaluzny declined to comment.

Such high-stakes gambits are typical of an investor seen by peers as a brutally tough negotiator with a stomach for some of the most complex turnarounds on Wall Street.

Kaluzny honed his craft at buyout group Golden Gate Capital, before setting up Sycamore in 2011. It was a rich time to buy brick-and-mortar retailers: shopping centres were still full of foot traffic and the 2008 financial crisis had knocked many of their businesses off track, creating cheap opportunities for pugnacious investors such as Apollo Global Management and KKR.

Yet since then, the approach has sometimes struggled.

Advertisement

Investing in retail companies with hulking real estate footprints and thousands of employees can be treacherous, and when retailers fail, they do not collapse quietly.

Previous Sycamore deals involved the owner of shoe Stuart Weitzman and Kurt Geiger © Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg
The buyout firm’s latest acquisition is for a different type of troubled retailer, Walgreens Boots Alliance © Bridget Bennett/Bloomberg

“Private equity firms have lost so much money in retail,” said one banker that has worked with Sycamore. “Retail and leverage don’t usually work well. If you get the timing wrong, if you get the fashion wrong, you get your head handed to you.”

One of Sycamore’s thornier situations was its 2014 investment in retail conglomerate Jones Group, where the buyout firm sold two of the company’s most valuable brands — Stuart Weitzman and Kurt Geiger — to another entity it controlled.

It renamed the rump of the business Nine West, which filed for bankruptcy in 2018, and sparked a legal brawl.

Creditors accused the private equity group of stripping Nine West of valuable assets, leaving it unable to pay off its debt and ultimately insolvent. Sycamore settled the dispute in court by paying junior bondholders; in exchange, the group received releases from future liabilities related to the buyout.

Three years after Nine West’s bankruptcy filing, another Sycamore portfolio company, private department store chain Belk, filed for bankruptcy under the weight of more than $1bn in debt after six years under the firm’s ownership. Sycamore ultimately ceded control of the company to lenders in a restructuring last year.

Advertisement

Sycamore’s first fund had returned 24 per cent as of the third quarter of last year, while its third fund from 2018 had brought in 18 per cent, according to a person familiar with the returns and public filings. However, its second one from 2014 has only returned 5 per cent.

The private equity group launched a fourth fundraise during the second half of last year which has yet to close, according to a person familiar with the matter.

While private equity titans like Blackstone and KKR have generally walked away from retail buyouts, Sycamore — and Kaluzny — has stuck around.

Kaluzny has run the firm on his own since 2022, when his co-founder Peter Morrow departed. “Stefan’s smart about it,” said the lawyer. “They really scrutinise the assets and figure out ways they can capture value, in a way other people couldn’t.”

With Walgreens Boots, the 90 per cent drop in the company’s market capitalisation in the past decade spells opportunity.

Advertisement

US pharmacy chains have suffered from a punishing combination of flagging sales and steeper costs, and Walgreens has been no exception.

The buyout group will attempt to turn the business around by using the same game plan it has applied to other targets in its 14 years of buying brands, according to people familiar with the group’s business strategy.

Sycamore ultimately plans to split the pharmacy chain into at least three businesses, the Financial Times previously reported. The company’s US pharmacy retailer Walgreens, its British retail arm Boots, and the speciality pharma unit Shields Health Solutions are among the units that could ultimately become independent companies.

Pulling that off means putting in place precise financing arrangements for the deal to reflect the differing prospects of the businesses, one of the reasons the buyout took months to negotiate.

Lenders to the US retail business, for example, required Sycamore to secure the debt with inventory, including prescription drugs, according to a person involved in the deal.

Advertisement

Such a structure gives lenders — which include private credit firm Ares — a claim on the assets if the unit defaults on its debt or ultimately files for bankruptcy.

Cleaving a company into parts can help buyout firms unlock conglomerate discounts and secure a higher overall payout, and Sycamore is well practised in the art. But there is still considerable work to be done whipping parts of Walgreens’ core business into shape for potential future buyers.

“Presumably Sycamore’s going to be focused on cost-cutting and cost-reduction to improve cash flow,” said James Goldstein, the head of US retail at CreditSights.

“I’m sure they’ll push hard, but do they have better ideas of how to fix the pharmacy business than the existing management team or anyone else? I don’t know.”

Additional reporting by Sujeet Indap, Antoine Gara and Eric Platt in New York

Advertisement

News

Trump administration sends letter wiping out addiction, mental health grants

Published

on

Trump administration sends letter wiping out addiction, mental health grants

A demonstrator holds a sign during International Overdose Awareness Day on Aug. 28, 2024 in New York City.

Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images

The Trump administration sent shockwaves through the U.S. mental health and drug addiction system late Tuesday, sending hundreds of termination letters, effective immediately, for federal grants supporting health services.

Three sources said they believe total cuts to nonprofit groups, many providing street-level care to people experiencing addiction, homelessness and mental illness, could reach roughly $2 billion. NPR wasn’t able to independently confirm the scale of the grant cancellation. The U.S. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMSHA) didn’t respond to a request for clarification.

“We are definitely looking at severe loss of front-line capacity,” said Andrew Kessler, head of Slingshot Solutions, a consultancy firm that works with mental health and addiction groups nationwide. “[Programs] may have to shut their doors tomorrow.”

Advertisement

Kessler said he has reviewed numerous grant termination letters from “Salt Lake City to El Paso to Detroit, all over the country.”

Ryan Hampton, the founder of Mobilize Recovery, a national advocacy nonprofit for people in and seeking recovery, told NPR his group lost roughly $500,000 “overnight.”

“Waking up to nearly $2 billion in grant cancellations means front-line providers are forced to cease overdose prevention, naloxone distribution, and peer recovery services immediately, leaving our communities defenseless against a raging crisis,” Hampton said. “This cruelty will be measured in lives lost, as recovery centers shutter and the safety net we built is slashed overnight. We are witnessing the dismantling of our recovery infrastructure in real-time, and the administration will have blood on its hands for every preventable death that follows.”

Copies of the letter sent to two different organizations and reviewed by NPR signal that SAMHSA officials no longer believe the defunded programs align with the Trump administration’s priorities.

The letter points to efforts to reshape the national health system in part by restructuring SAMHSA’s grant program, which “includes terminating some of its … awards.”

Advertisement

According to the letter, grants are terminated as of Jan.13, adding that “costs resulting from financial obligations incurred after termination are not allowable.”

The National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors sent a letter to members saying it believes “over 2,000 grants [nationwide] with a total of more than $2 billion” are affected. The group said it’s still working to understand the “full scope” of the cuts.

This move comes on top of deep Medicaid cuts, passed last year by the Republican-controlled Congress, which affect numerous mental health and addiction care providers.

Kessler told NPR he’s hearing alarm from care providers nationwide that the safety net for people experiencing an addiction or mental health crisis could unravel.

“In the short term, there’s going to be severe damage. We’re going to have to scramble,” he said.

Advertisement

Regina LaBelle, a Georgetown University professor who served as acting head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy during the Biden administration, said the SAMHSA grants pay for lifesaving services.

“From first responders to drug courts, continued federal funding quite literally save lives,” LaBelle said. “The overdose epidemic has been declared a public health emergency and overdose deaths are decreasing. This is no time to pull critical funding.”

Requests for comment from SAMHSA and the Department of Health and Human Services were not immediately returned.

This is a developing story.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: Clashes With Federal Agents in Minneapolis Escalate

Published

on

Video: Clashes With Federal Agents in Minneapolis Escalate

new video loaded: Clashes With Federal Agents in Minneapolis Escalate

transcript

transcript

Clashes With Federal Agents in Minneapolis Escalate

Fear and frustration among residents in Minneapolis have mounted as ICE and Border Patrol agents have deployed aggressive tactics and conducted arrests after the killing of Renee Good by an immigration officer last week.

“Open it. Last warning.” “Do you have an ID on you, ma’am?” “I don’t need an ID to walk around in — In my city. This is my city.” “OK. Do you have some ID then, please?” “I don’t need it.” “If not, we’re going to put you in the vehicle and we’re going to ID you.” “I am a U.S. citizen.” “All right. Can we see an ID, please?” “I am a U.S. citizen.”

Advertisement
Fear and frustration among residents in Minneapolis have mounted as ICE and Border Patrol agents have deployed aggressive tactics and conducted arrests after the killing of Renee Good by an immigration officer last week.

By Jamie Leventhal and Jiawei Wang

January 13, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Lindsey Halligan argues she should still be U.S. attorney, accuses judge of abuse of power

Published

on

Lindsey Halligan argues she should still be U.S. attorney, accuses judge of abuse of power

Top Justice Department officials defended Lindsey Halligan’s attempts to remain in her position as a U.S. attorney in court filings Tuesday, responding to a federal judge who demanded to know why she was continuing to do so after another judge had found that her appointment was invalid.

The filing, signed by Halligan, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, accused a Trump-appointed judge of “gross abuse of power,” and attempting to “coerce the Executive Branch into conformity.”

Last week, U.S. District Judge David Novak, who sits on the federal bench in Richmond, ordered Halligan to provide the basis for her repeated use of the title of U.S. attorney and explain why it “does not constitute a false or misleading statement.” 

Novak gave Halligan seven days to respond to his order and brief on why he “should not strike Ms. Halligan’s identification as United States attorney” after she listed herself on an indictment returned in the Eastern District of Virginia in December as a “United States attorney and special attorney.”

U.S. District Judge Cameron Currie had ruled in November that Halligan’s appointment as interim U.S. attorney was invalid and violated the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, and she dismissed the cases Halligan had brought against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. 

Advertisement

The statute invoked by the Trump administration to appoint Halligan allows an interim U.S. attorney to serve for 120 days. After that, the interim U.S. attorney may be extended by the U.S. district court judges for the region. 

Currie found that the 120-day clock began when Halligan’s predecessor, Erik Siebert was initially appointed in January 2025. Currie concluded that when that timeframe expired, Bondi’s authority to appoint an interim U.S. attorney expired along with it. 

The judge ruled that Halligan had been serving unlawfully since Sept. 22 and concluded that “all actions flowing from Ms. Halligan’s defective appointment” had to be set aside. That included the Comey and James indictments.

In their response, Bondi, Blanche and Halligan called Novak’s move an “inquisition,” “insult,” and a “cudgel” against the executive branch. The Justice Department argued that Currie’s ruling in November applied only to the Comey and James cases and did not bar Halligan from calling herself U.S. attorney in other cases that she oversees. 

“Adding insult to error, [Novak’s order] posits that the United States’ continued assertion of its legal position that Ms. Halligan properly serves as the United States Attorney amounts to a factual misrepresentation that could trigger attorney discipline. The Court’s thinly veiled threat to use attorney discipline to cudgel the Executive Branch into conforming its legal position in all criminal prosecutions to the views of a single district judge is a gross abuse of power and an affront to the separation of powers,” the Justice Department wrote.

Advertisement

In his earlier order, Novak said that Currie’s decision “remains binding precedent in this district and is not subject to being ignored.”

The Justice Department called Currie’s ruling “erroneous”: and said that Halligan is entitled to maintain her position “notwithstanding a single district judge’s contrary view.”

On Monday, the second-highest ranking federal prosecutor in the Eastern District of Virginia, Robert McBride, was fired after he refused to help lead the Justice Department’s prosecution of Comey, a source familiar with the matter told CBS News. McBride is a former longtime federal prosecutor in Kentucky’s Eastern District and had only been on the job as first assistant U.S. attorney for a few months after joining the office in the fall. 

Halligan is a former insurance lawyer who was a member of President Trump’s legal team, and joined Mr. Trump’s White House staff after he won a second term in 2024. In September, Halligan was selected to serve as interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia after her predecessor abruptly left the post amid concerns he would be forced out for failing to prosecute James.

Just days after she was appointed, Halligan sought and secured a two-count indictment against Comey alleging he lied to Congress during testimony in September 2020. James, the New York attorney general, was indicted on bank fraud charges in early October. Both pleaded not guilty and pursued several arguments to have their respective indictments dismissed, including the validity of Halligan’s appointment, and claims of vindictive prosecution.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending