Indiana
Indiana Pacers Keep James Johnson As Contract Becomes Guaranteed
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS – DECEMBER 27: James Johnson #16 of the Indiana Pacers runs downcourt against … [+]
INDIANAPOLIS — The Indiana Pacers were facing a contract deadline on Tuesday with forward James Johnson. The veteran four man, who is in his 16th NBA season, entered the day on a partially guaranteed contract.
Johnson’s minimum deal this season had $750k guaranteed, though he has already surpassed that amount in late December in terms of accrued earnings. On January 10th, every contract in the NBA becomes guaranteed, so the full amount of Johnson’s deal would hit the books if he is still on Indiana’s roster on that date.
Technically, though, the contract guarantee date for Johnson came on Tuesday the 7th. That’s because a player has to clear the waiver process, which takes two days, by the 10th to have the non-guaranteed part of their salary removed from a team’s salary books. So if a player like Johnson — that had a contract which wasn’t fully guaranteed this season — wasn’t waived on/before Tuesday, then their contract would be fully guaranteed.
The Pacers kept Johnson through that date, meaning his $3.3 million salary is now guaranteed for the season, though Indiana is only responsible for just under $2.1 million of that. The rest is reimbursed by the NBA, so Indiana’s cap hit for Johnson for the remainder of the season is that $2.1 million number.
“He’s not going anywhere,” Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle told Dustin Dopirak of the Indianapolis Star this week when asked about Johnson. “We need him.”
Why did the Pacers keep James Johnson?
For the Pacers, the decision to keep Johnson or not was all about the balance of financial savings and leadership. The blue and gold are right up against the luxury tax — barely sitting under the tax threshold right now. Waiving Johnson on Tuesday would have saved the team $1.1 million and given them more distance below the tax line.
What Indiana had to determine is if there was a better use of that savings than having Johnson on the roster. He’s played in six games for the blue and gold this season, but his value comes almost entirely off the court, which has been made clear by the number of times the Pacers have re-signed Johnson.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK – JANUARY 06: Day’Ron Sharpe #20 of the Brooklyn Nets and James Johnson #16 of … [+]
He is one of the oldest players in the NBA and a key veteran for a growing Pacers team. His voice is well received, and he is one of the first players off the bench to offer encouragement or tips during in-game timeouts. His work behind the scenes is extremely important to the team, which is why he’s been around for three seasons.
As a result, Johnson was retained at the expense of some optionality. “He doesn’t let things slide,” Pacers guard T.J. McConnell said of Johnson a few years ago. “Usually, there are guys that let things go. But I feel like he feels like he owes it to us that we’re not going to create any bad habits here.”
Some flexibility could have been nice for the Pacers with the trade deadline approaching, but having more options only carries value if there are good options available. While a few more very specific trades could have opened up, they weren’t worth losing a valuable veteran.
Johnson, 37, has signed seven contracts with Indiana since September of 2022. He’s averaging 1.3 points per game this season, and guys love having him around. “He’s super valuable for the team. He’s kind of just like a glue guy,” Pacers rookie Johnny Furphy said of Johnson.
The Pacers opted for continuity in the offseason and kept Johnson. He’ll keep helping in his own way as Indiana looks to keep climbing the Eastern Conference standings.
“Those are my guys,” Johnson said of the Pacers after re-signing during the 2023-24 season. “I don’t think I would have went back [to the NBA] for any other call other than the Pacers.”
Indiana
What Should Indiana Pacers Do With Open Roster Spot?
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA – JANUARY 10: Quenton Jackson #29 of the Indiana Pacers drives to the basket against the Miami Heat at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on January 10, 2026 in Indianapolis, Indiana. (Photo by Justin Casterline/Getty Images)
Getty Images
BROOKLYN – With the trade deadline having passed, the Indiana Pacers don’t have a full roster. The team has three two-way contract players, but only 14 guys on standard contracts, just under the maximum of 15.
As of this writing, the Pacers total team spending this season is about $730k less than the NBA’s luxury tax threshold for the 2025-26 season. That means the team has enough wiggle room under that spending line to add a 15th player without becoming a taxpaying team. Given the team’s poor record, the luxury tax line should be an upper spending limit for the franchise this league year, but Indiana can now fill its roster without crossing that barrier.
More specifically, the team can fill their open roster spot at any point between now and the end of the season with a deal that starts under $730k, either via a minimum-salary deal or by dipping into their Mid-Level Salary Exception. And they should add someone – having a full roster and using every available resource is smart business.
“We’ve got to be mindful of the tax as we go through things, but there’s a timing and sequence that gives us the possibility to do something there,” Pacers general manager Chad Buchanan said of the Pacers open spot on the roster.
What considerations do the Pacers have for their open roster spot?
But there are other considerations for the Pacers, particularly on the calendar, when it comes to making transactions. And those considerations will all come to a head in the next week as the team figures out the back of its roster.
March 1 is the first date of significance. That is the last day for what is colloquially known as the buyout market. Often, between the trade deadline and March 1, teams and players determine that their contractual obligation to each other doesn’t make much sense for the rest of the season.
In order to make splitting up a win-win move, the team and player will agree to a buyout, meaning the team will waive a player in exchange for getting some guaranteed salary removed from their contract. Almost always, the player makes up the amount given up in the buyout by signing with another team. So the player doesn’t lose money and their old team can proceed with a roster spot, of which they can use for something they deem more appropriate.
March 1 is viewed as the end of the buyout market because it is the last day a player can be waived, then later sign with another team and still be eligible for the playoffs. If a player is released after that date, they lose postseason eligibility.
For the Pacers, it may be worth seeing if a player that they want becomes available between now and March 1. Jeremy Sochan, for example, was waived by the San Antonio Spurs before signing with the New York Knicks earlier this month. While Indiana may not have wanted Sochan, he is a young and skilled player. More talent of note may hit free agency in the coming week.
The second date the Pacers will be cognizant of is March 4. That’s the final day that NBA teams can sign players to two-way contracts this season, which adds an additional wrinkle to the Pacers plans.
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA – OCTOBER 13: Jalen Slawson #18 of the Indiana Pacers drives to the basket against the San Antonio Spurs during the preseason game at Bankers Life Fieldhouse on October 13, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana. (Photo by Justin Casterline/Getty Images)
Getty Images
While the Pacers don’t currently have an open two-way contract slot, they could if they opted to promote one of their current players on a two-way deal to a standard contract. And one candidate stands out for that type of transaction for multiple reasons: Quenton Jackson.
Contractual factors play a part in Jackson being by far the most likely Pacers two-way player to have his deal converted to a standard contract. Jackson is currently on a one-year deal, meaning he will be a free agent in the offseason. That is not true of Indiana’s other two-way contract players – both Ethan Thompson and Taelon Peter are signed to two-year, two-way contracts.
Jackson has reached four years of service in the NBA, meaning he isn’t eligible for a two-way deal next season. If the Pacers want to keep him beyond the current campaign, they’d need to sign him to a standard contract anyway.
And that brings the team to the main reason they may want to convert Jackson to a standard contract and retain him beyond this season: he’s a talented player. Ever since stepping into a bigger role in late 2024, the athletic guard has proven that he can contribute and give the blue and gold rotation-level minutes in a pinch. He is averaging 9.1 points and 2.1 assists per game this season – both numbers are career-best marks.
He has played in 60 games for the Pacers across the last three seasons, all of which have come on different two-way deals. In 27 outings for the Pacers G League affiliate team, Jackson has averaged 22.1 points and 5.7 assists per game.
Converting Jackson to a standard deal, and perhaps a multi-year one, would fill the Pacers final open roster spot and free up a two-way contract slot. It could also allow the team to keep Jackson as a depth piece beyond this season. Jackson is skilled and athletic, and he fits Indiana’s style well.
“[Jackson is] definitely a real possibility. Quenton’s been awesome. He was fantastic last night, and he’s a big part of our culture in our locker room,” Buchanan said of Jackson perhaps getting the team’s final roster spot.
If that is the route the Pacers decide to take, they would then be able to sign a player to a two-way contract. That sequence of transactions is how they landed Jackson in the first place back in 2024. There are endless candidates for a two-way deal, but if the Pacers look to add a wing after losing Johnny Furphy to injury, Jalen Slawson may be a good fit. He is in the Pacers program via their G League affiliate and played for Indiana during the 2025 preseason.
Because the Pacers can’t sign a two-way contract player after March 4, if they decide to convert Jackson they would almost certainly do so before that date so they can backfill his two-way spot. Between that and the buyout market, the Pacers could fill out their roster within the next week or so. A young player or a familiar face makes too much sense.
Indiana
Hemp based THC products ban bill fails to advance in Indiana House
INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. (WSBT) — An Indiana bill aimed at banning hemp based THC products from being sold to people 21-years-old and younger in the state failed to advance in the House on Tuesday.
Senate Bill 250 would ban the sale, and prohibit their sale or advertisement within 1,000 feet of schools and playgrounds.
State Senator Aaron Freeman released a statement, saying in part:
BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT
The bill also closed the “Farm bill loophole” derived from the 2018 Farm Bill, which created legal gray area that companies have claimed allows them to sell high potency intoxicating THC products. I am disappointed the bill was not called down, as it is a common-sense approach to keeping harmful products out of our kids’ hands.
Indiana
The growing backlash to Indiana’s baby box empire
Indiana senators debate bill to ban abortion pills in the state
Indiana Senate advances bill allowing citizens to sue over abortion inducing drugs in a major shift for anti abortion efforts.
This article was originally published by Mirror Indy and is republished through our partnership with Free Press Indiana.
Monica Kelsey brought a baby box to the Indiana Statehouse.
Last fall, she joined lawmakers celebrating the 25th anniversary of the state’s Safe Haven Law, which allows parents to legally surrender their newborns to hospitals, police and firefighters.
Kelsey, a former paramedic, created the boxes, purported to give a desperate mother more anonymity: She can place her baby inside and walk away forever.
When the door opens, alarms trigger first responders, who collect the baby. Kelsey got the idea while promoting abstinence on a 2013 trip to South Africa. The work is personal: Kelsey said her mother was raped as a teenager and left her at an Ohio hospital after giving birth.
“I was one of those kids,” Kelsey, 52, said. “The unwanted kid everybody talks about.”
Now, a facility in her hometown of Woodburn in northeast Indiana produces almost all of the nation’s baby boxes. Her nonprofit, Safe Haven Baby Boxes, is a growing empire with 1.2 million followers on TikTok, a merch line and more than $4.4 million in revenue reported in 2024.
“These boxes are more than plastic and technology,” Kelsey told the crowd gathered Nov. 18 at the Indiana Statehouse. “They are mercy made tangible.”
Republican Gov. Mike Braun and other top state leaders listened from the front row. Before the event began, they bowed their heads as a preacher spoke: “We pray that every voice that would rise up against life in this state would be brought low.”
After Indiana passed a near-total abortion ban in 2022, Republican lawmakers have championed baby boxes as a solution for crisis pregnancies and infant abandonment. Churches, anti-abortion groups and $1 million allocated by the Indiana legislature have covered the costs to install some of the state’s boxes in the walls of fire departments and hospitals — even as officials at the Indiana Department of Health raised safety concerns.
After a baby is surrendered in the boxes, first responders complete a medical evaluation. Then, the infant goes into the custody of the Department of Child Services or a licensed child-placing agency.
Safe Haven Laws are stricter than regular adoptions: Birth parents have about 15 days to petition a court to get their child back — otherwise, their legal rights are terminated. Most of the babies placed in boxes grow up without knowing who surrendered them — or why.
Indiana now has about 150 baby boxes — more than a fourth of the boxes installed across the country. Nine are in Indianapolis. They’re expensive, but rarely used.
The price for one box is roughly $22,000 in installation costs, maintenance and annual fees. In the last decade, Kelsey’s nonprofit said at least 30 babies have been surrendered in Indiana via the boxes. That amounts to about three cases a year.
“When this baby is born, they’re going to go in a dumpster or one of our boxes,” Kelsey told Mirror Indy. “I think we can all agree a baby does not deserve to be in a dumpster.”
Critics ask for FDA approval
Messages like this have proven successful for Kelsey’s nonprofit.
Tax records show how donations powered her spending in 2024: $116,000 on travel, including trips for box blessing ceremonies across the country; more than $200,000 to cover her and her husband’s salaries; and a $382,000 advertising budget. (In an email, Kelsey said her salary is on-par with other nonprofit CEOs and the marketing is “life-saving awareness.”)
But she’s also increasingly playing defense. As the money flows in, backlash is growing.
It crystallized in 2024, when nearly 100 academics, child welfare advocates and legislators sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. They asked the agency to regulate baby boxes.
The Food and Drug Administration does not consider the boxes to be medical devices — a label that regulates everything from electronic toothbrushes to bandages.
That’s concerning to Lori Bruce, a bioethicist from Yale University who signed the letter. The boxes, she said, have heating and cooling elements and alarms that could fail.
“It is unsettling that the federal government declined to regulate devices that have so many implications for the safety and wellbeing of infants,” Bruce said. “A bassinet is a medical device. A baby box is a bassinet with alarms, electricity and HVAC.”
In an email, Kelsey said her product has internal safety protocols, testing requirements and mandatory daily checks from first responders. “They are not medical devices,” she wrote. “They are safety devices designed to facilitate legal custody transfer.”
Still, the controversy continues, with more than 400 boxes installed across the country.
In Maryland, medical groups pushed back on legislation approving the boxes, citing safety concerns. In Nebraska, a lawmaker successfully opposed baby boxes, which were ultimately written out of legislation. The devices, Sen. Carol Blood said, could “unknowingly provide concealment for crimes such as rape, incest or human trafficking.”
She also pointed out financial gain for nonprofits such as Kelsey’s: “We’re opening the doors for these grifters to come to Nebraska.”
And in Indiana, the fight over boxes was just as contentious a decade ago. But ultimately, state health officials lost.
Kelsey’s attorney at the time was James Bopp Jr., a prominent conservative lawyer who has led efforts to restrict abortion.
“Freedom is the norm, not government regulation,” Bopp Jr. said in 2016. “We do not think there is any state or federal law that regulates baby boxes, so there are no federal bureaucrats to deal with.”
‘No endorsement’ from Indiana Department of Health
In 2015, legislators asked a commission of state leaders to develop recommendations for safety protocols and standards for baby boxes.
Dr. Jerome Adams, a member and the commissioner of the Indiana Department of Health at the time, didn’t approve of the boxes. Neither did the commission’s Task Force on Infant Mortality and Child Health, a group made up of doctors and child welfare officials.
“There is simply no evidence to suggest the use of a baby box is a safe and prudent way to surrender a child,” Adams said in a joint 2016 statement with the Indiana Department of Child Services.
Instead, both agencies encouraged parents to surrender babies in-person. That’s a stance echoed by traditional Safe Haven groups, who say direct handoffs help mothers get immediate medical care and mental health support.
Emails obtained by Mirror Indy show Kelsey fighting back.
The state health department’s “accusations and mischaracterizations” about the safety of baby boxes, Kelsey wrote in a June 2016 email to agency leadership, are “unwarranted, ignorant (in the purest meaning of the word) and just plain wrong.”
Another section, directed at Adams: “YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN COMING TOGETHER AND WORKING WITH SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES FOR THE BETTERMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THIS STATE.”
Ultimately, Kelsey installed the boxes — without the support of the Indiana Department of Health and Department of Child Services. And in 2017, legislators supported her mission by expanding the state’s Safe Haven Law to include baby boxes.
When Adams opposed the devices in 2016, Kelsey said, baby boxes were still new: “That does not mean they were inherently unsafe. Since then Indiana law has changed and boxes have operated without injury or death.”
Adams, reached by Mirror Indy via email, said he still has safety concerns all these years later. Those include possible delays in medical care for the surrendered baby and no “standardized oversight” of the boxes.
“As for why Indiana now has so many baby boxes, that didn’t then and doesn’t now reflect a state health department endorsement,” said Adams, who later became the U.S. Surgeon General under President Trump in 2017. “Laws changed and local entities were allowed to install them. The health department didn’t have the authority to stop that, even if not leading or recommending it as an evidence-based approach.”
See Dr. Jerome Adams’ full 2026 statement to Mirror Indy
The Indiana Department of Health, which has new leadership under Dr. Lindsay Weaver, did not answer questions about previous safety concerns. “We can’t speculate about past conversations regarding safe haven boxes,” a spokesperson wrote in a December 2025 email.
Adams, for his part, championed solutions outside of the boxes: improving awareness of the Safe Haven Law, expanding health care access and support for moms in crisis.
“Those approaches are backed by data,” he wrote, and “address why people feel like they have no options in the first place.”
‘Just an escape hatch’
In Indianapolis, one hospital has a baby box.
Franciscan Health installed the device in 2024. Melanie Boosey, the hospital’s manager of labor and delivery, started raising donations in the wake of Indiana’s near-total abortion ban. Even if the box isn’t used often, she said, it’s there as a last resort.
“I know the argument that it shouldn’t be a policy to just build baby boxes everywhere,” Boosey said. “But when working within the construct of my state law and a Catholic institution, I felt like this was something we could do.”
Other doctors said the boxes distract from the very issues that create crisis pregnancies: poverty, child care access and limited prenatal care.
“Putting an infant in a box and pretending it’s a win is a bit problematic,” said Dr. Elizabeth Ferries-Rowe, an OB-GYN at Eskenazi Health. “It’s just an escape hatch from the problems the state created.”
Alternate programs exist in Indianapolis. The BIRTH Fund gives up to $20K to pregnant women living in the city’s worst zip codes for infant mortality — no strings attached. Research shows financial pressure is a key reason people give up their children.
“We’re working toward long-term solutions that would make a baby box obsolete,” said Benjamin Tapper, the city’s chief diversity and equity officer who helped set up the fund in Indianapolis.
In an email, Kelsey said she supports policies that help with economic stability, housing and health care access — and that her nonprofit’s hotline connects parents to these resources.
“However, these programs do not address acute crisis moments, which are the circumstances in which unsafe abandonment occurs,” she wrote. “A baby box is not a substitute for economic policy — it is an emergency intervention.”
That sentiment rings true for the Barkman family, who adopted a baby in 2020 after he was placed in the box at Decatur Township Fire Station 74. The northside couple, who struggled with infertility, had long prayed for a child.
“Surrendering your child is one of the most selfless acts and biggest showing of love,” Kimberly Barkman told Mirror Indy. “We’re so grateful to Samuel’s mom for doing that.”
Sometimes, the little boy visits fire stations with his parents. “I was in there?” his mom remembers him asking once, pointing at the box.
In the moment, she nodded. Barkman knows she’ll be fielding questions for years to come. But she’s glad he’s alive and asking.
“We don’t want infants abandoned,” Barkman said. “We don’t want Brookside Park to happen again.”
Babyland
On Sept. 1, 2025, remains were found in the Indianapolis eastside park. Some Safe Haven advocates claimed it was the state’s first fatal infant abandonment in more than a decade.
Kelsey talked about the mother on TikTok. “If she would have just utilized the Safe Haven law, none of this would be happening,” Kelsey said. “A perfectly healthy little girl, just discarded like trash.”
Mirror Indy asked the Marion County Coroner if the death occurred in-utero or after birth, but did not receive an answer. The coroner’s office said the cause and manner of death are undetermined.
When Safe Haven fails, someone else enters the fold: Linda Znachko, the founder of He Knows Your Name, a local ministry honoring the lives of abandoned and unclaimed babies.
She was by Kelsey’s side at the Indiana Statehouse for the November Safe Haven anniversary event. The two met in 2015 at a funeral for an abandoned baby. “That’s a problem,” Kelsey had said, pointing at the little casket going into the ground. “I have the solution.”
A decade later, Znachko is still pleading for parents to use the boxes.
“Baby Haven was found 15 minutes away from two baby boxes,” she told the crowd, repeating the name she gave the remains found at Brookside Park. “Let this be the day Indiana says no more.”
Half a month later, Znachko’s Mercedes-Benz weaved through Washington Park East Cemetery, stopping at a section still covered in snow. A blue sign read, “Babyland.”
Here, the debates over politics and policies go silent.
Znachko got out of her car and placed flowers on more than 50 graves. A small number were for infants abandoned in public throughout the years; others were left unclaimed at funeral homes or hospitals.
She personally buried many of them and often chooses their names in death. Most come from the Bible.
“These moms are tragically desperate, gripped by fear and unfortunately alone,” Znachko said. A woman with family and support, she continued, would not abandon a child: “That is not the heart of a mother.”
Sometimes, she tires of the questions and narratives about these tragedies.
“It’s really important to shift our focus from the homeless mom story or the addicted mom story or the dumpster story,” Znachko said. “These babies are laid to rest, and I believe they’re hanging out in heaven together.”
The newest plaque said “Baby Haven.” Roses from the October funeral were brown and dying. But one carnation, red against the snow, was still fresh.
Mirror Indy, a nonprofit newsroom, is funded through grants and donations from individuals, foundations and organizations.
Mirror Indy reporter Mary Claire Molloy covers health. Reach her at 317-721-7648 or email maryclaire.molloy@mirrorindy.org. Follow her on X @mcmolloy7.
-
World22 hours agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts1 day agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana7 days ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Oklahoma1 week agoWildfires rage in Oklahoma as thousands urged to evacuate a small city
-
Louisiana4 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology5 days agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Technology5 days agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
Denver, CO1 day ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted