Connect with us

Utah

How did Utah fare in the transfer portal?

Published

on

How did Utah fare in the transfer portal?


On the heels of a 5-7 season and an offseason offensive renovation with the hire of new offensive coordinator Jason Beck, the University of Utah had an extremely busy December in the transfer portal.

The fall transfer portal window officially closed on late Saturday night for Utah players, bringing a 20-day college football free agency blitz to an end, at least until the spring.

The tally, as of Monday morning? Twenty-four players entered the transfer portal from Utah, with the Utes picking up 15 players. That’s right on target, as coach Kyle Whittingham said in November that the Utes were expecting to add around 10-15 players through the portal, though the Utes might not be done yet.

Though the transfer portal has closed for most teams — teams playing in the postseason get a five-day extension for their players to enter following the conclusion of their seasons — programs can still pick up those in the portal at any time (the deadline is only for players to enter their names), so Utah can still add players to their team as the calendar turns to January.

Advertisement

That said, the majority of transfer portal action has concluded, so here’s an overview of how the Utes fared.

Quarterback

This was by far the biggest need in the transfer portal for Utah after two seasons of dismal play at the position. Shortly after the school hired New Mexico’s Beck as the schools offensive coordinator, his quarterback announced that he was coming along for the ride.

New Mexico quarterback Devon Dampier, a sophomore, was the perfect fit for Beck’s quarterback-run-heavy offensive scheme, helping the Lobos generate 484.2 yards per game and become the fourth-most-productive offense in the country last season.

Dampier was one of the most productive quarterbacks in the nation, accounting for 3,934 yards of offense in 2024 (2,768 passing and 1,166 rushing). While there are some accuracy issues he’ll need to clean up as he makes the move to the Big 12 — he threw 12 touchdowns and 12 interceptions and competed just 57.9% of his passes — there’s one thing that’s almost guaranteed: Utah’s offense is going to be a lot more exciting to watch than the last two years.

Dampier has a lot of upside and raises the ceiling of Utah’s offense. As long as he can be more accurate in 2025, the Utes will be in a much better position under center.

Advertisement

Behind Dampier, the presumed 2025 starter, the Utes have Oklahoma freshman transfer Brendan Zurbrugg, a 6-foot-2, 207-pound freshman that redshirted last season, and Isaac Wilson, who removed his name from the portal and returned to Utah.

Running back

If quarterback was priority No. 1, running back was definitely priority No. 2 for the Utes in the transfer portal. Every scholarship running back — Micah Bernard, Jaylon Glover, Mike Mitchell, Anthony Woods, Dijon Stanley and John Randle Jr. — either ran out of eligibility or entered the transfer portal.

A complete revamp of the room was necessary, and that started with the addition of Washington State’s Mark Atuaia, who was brought in by Beck to be Utah’s new running backs coach.

Washington State running back Wayshawn Parker (21) carries the ball during the first half of an NCAA college football game against Utah State, Saturday, Nov. 9, 2024, in Pullman, Wash. | Young Kwak

Washington State freshman Wayshawn Parker, who rushed for 735 yards and four touchdowns on 137 carries in his true freshman season in Pullman, was perhaps Utah’s biggest transfer portal pickup. The 6-foot, 199-pound running back was ranked by 247Sports as the No. 2 running back, and 40th overall player, in this year’s transfer portal.

Behind Parker is New Mexico junior NaQuari Rogers (74 carries for 382 yards and five touchdowns) and UNLV freshman Devin Green (29 carries for 123 yards and one touchdown). Utah had a commitment from New Mexico State’s Mike Washington (725 yards and eight scores on 157 carries), but he flipped to Arkansas.

Advertisement

Overall, Utah met its needs here, though keeping Mitchell, who played injured most of the year and was a candidate for a better 2025 season, would have been nice.

Wide receiver

Utah initially landed a coveted wide receiver transfer in Tulsa’s Joseph Williams, who was named the American Athletic Conference Freshman of the Year. Williams, who had 30 receptions for 588 yards and five touchdowns, had offers from numerous Power Four teams, including Michigan, USC and Colorado.

Williams never signed with Utah after committing, however, and a visit to Colorado sealed the deal for the Buffaloes. Williams’ flip was a blow to Utah’s transfer portal receiving class, as the Utes lost their premier pickup.

Utah still brought in three receivers — Mississippi State’s Creed Whittemore, who chose to redshirt after four games (four receptions for 65 yards, 41 rushing yards); New Mexico’s Ryan Davis (54 receptions for 747 yards and three touchdowns) and Utah State’s Otto Tia (44 receptions for 434 yards and seven touchdowns).

Whittemore could see time in the slot for Utah, while Davis brings chemistry and time with Dampier. Tia is perhaps the most intriguing player, bringing size (6-foot-4, 220 pounds) and experience as a senior to the room.

Advertisement

Having Joseph Williams would have really completed the room, but Utah picked up some promising pieces.

It remains to be seen if one of these transfers breaks out as a WR1 for the Utes, or if it will be one of the returning players like Zacharyus Williams (who came on strong during the last four games and finished with 10 catches for 101 yards) and Dadrien Zipperer (eight catches for 122 yards).

Cornerback

One of the more surprising portal entries this cycle was from Ute cornerback Cameron Calhoun, who couldn’t turn down an offer from Alabama and transferred to Tuscaloosa.

With Calhoun’s transfer, plus the transfers of CJ Blocker and Randle Jr., who spent time at cornerback this season, and the graduation of Zemaiah Vaughn, Utah went after three players in the portal to fill the room back up.

Utah is an easy sell to a cornerback transfer and as a result, the Utes snagged Blake Cotton, a UC Davis junior who was ranked the No. 20 cornerback in the transfer portal by 247Sports, and Jeremiah Caldwell, a Garden City Community College product who is ranked the No. 5 junior college cornerback by 247Sports.

Advertisement
UC Davis defensive back Blake Cotton (12) breaks up a pass intended for California wide receiver Tommy Christakos (89) during game in Berkeley, Calif., Saturday, Sept. 3, 2022. | Godofredo A. Vásquez

The Utes also added Texas A&M junior Donovan Saunders, who played 33 snaps over two games with the Aggies.

Elijah Davis returns and could be slotted in a starting spot, Smith Snowden returns at nickel and Kenan Johnson was trending toward a return to Utah, Whittingham said in November. That’s a solid starting group, though the loss of Calhoun, who seemed to be poised to be a starter next year, definitely hurts.

Overall, despite the loss of Calhoun, the Utes did a great job regrouping and bolstering the cornerback position.

Defensive tackle

Utah knew it was already going to have to replace one starter at the defensive tackle position after Junior Tafuna graduated, but the Utes didn’t expect to have to replace another.

Keanu Tanuvasa threw his name into the transfer portal in a very surprising portal entry that came weeks after he seemingly reaffirmed his commitment to the Utes on social media. On Monday morning, he reportedly transferred to rival BYU, dealing a blow to Utah’s defense.

Throw in the transfer of Simote Pepa and the graduation of Tevita Fotu, and the defensive tackles room is going to look a lot different in 2025.

Advertisement

Aliki Vimahi and Dallas Vakalahi both started in 2024 when Tafuna and Tanuvasa were injured, and should compete for the starting roles, but a transfer portal addition to the room is needed.

BYU head coach Kalani Sitake talks with Utah Utes defensive tackle Keanu Tanuvasa (57) after the game at Rice-Eccles Stadium in Salt Lake City on Sunday, Nov. 10, 2024. On Monday, reports surfaced that Tanuvasa is transferring to BYU. | Jeffrey D. Allred, Deseret News



Source link

Utah

Utah QB Devon Dampier confirms he will play in Las Vegas Bowl vs. Nebraska

Published

on

Utah QB Devon Dampier confirms he will play in Las Vegas Bowl vs. Nebraska


The weeks following the college football regular season provide players plenty of time to weigh their NFL draft options against their desire to compete in a bowl game.

In Utah’s case, offensive tackles Spencer Fano and Caleb Lomu, as well as defensive end Logan Fano, decided it was in their best interests to forego the Utes’ Las Vegas Bowl matchup against Nebraska and declare for the 2026 NFL Draft instead.

Utah quarterback Devon Dampier, meanwhile, was looking forward to one last ride with his 2025 teammates before calling it a season.

Advertisement

“I chose to finish out this season with my team,” Dampier said during a media availability session Thursday. “I’m gonna play in the game. But some people, it’s a lot higher stakes; got a couple first rounders and things like that.”

Advertisement

‘We know those guys love us. They let it be known every day since they’ve been here, so we still support those guys and they support us.”

Utah head coach Kyle Whittingham presumed Thursday that the Fano brothers and Lomu would be the only bowl game opt-outs on Utah’s side, along with a few walk-ons. Some Utes who announced their transfer portal intentions continued to practice with the team as well.

Dampier confirmed his availability for the Las Vegas Bowl after a historic regular season under center, becoming the first Utes signal-caller to throw for over 2,000 yards and rush for over 600 yards in a single season since Alex Smith accomplished the feat in 2004. Dampier had 2,180 passing yards, a career-high 22 passing touchdowns and only five interceptions after throwing 12 picks last season. He also had 687 rushing yards and seven touchdowns going into Utah’s postseason game.

While his intentions for Dec. 31 were made clear, Dampier’s status for next season remained somewhat cloudy. He did hint at making an announcement alongside fellow quarterback Byrd Ficklin, though it was postponed after Ficklin’s return to the Utes was leaked Dec. 11.

Advertisement

“Y’all going to see,” Dampier said when asked if he was coming back for the 2026 campaign. “It’s great. I’m very happy to be here.”

Advertisement

“[Ficklin and I] were trying to do something special, but his [return] got a little leaked out before we could get to it. But it’s coming.”

Dampier said during a radio show appearance earlier in December that he was “big on staying” and had “no intentions to leave” the Utes. He also said over the airwaves that he anticipates being named a captain for the 2026 squad, and that he does play a role in recruiting.

Dampier discussed Kyle Whittingham’s impending departure from the program and the future outlook with Morgan Scalley set to take over during his media availability session.

On Kyle Whittingham’s decision to step down as head coach

Advertisement

“That’s a legend. I got a lot of respect for him. I think he’s transformed this program. He’s made it perfect for [Morgan] Scalley to step in. I’m still excited to still be at Ute.”

On Morgan Scalley taking over as head coach

“I’m very confident in Scalley. When I came here on my visit, that was someone I talked to. He let me know the rundown for when his time comes. He had his full belief in me and in my talent, so I’m perfectly fine where I’m at.”

Advertisement

On sending Whittingham off with a win

“It means a lot to me. I could try to speak for everybody on the team, but for me, especially, that’s a coach that believed in me to come in here after being at New Mexico, and just had a full trust in me, in the offense, to do what we do. And that’s just huge respect from him, and just what he’s done for this program. This is one only programs in college football where you know what Utes do, you know how they play and you know the mentality. So for him to leave that up, I got to finish well for him.”

Advertisement

On whether the program is in better hands than it would be if an outsider was hired

“Most definitely. I think just what’s already set here, what’s known here; Scalley has been under Whitt. I think Whitt’s done a great job of allowing him to demonstrate what a good head coach looks like and I know Scalley is gonna step into it and do what he does.”

MORE UTAH NEWS & ANALYSIS

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Where did the Red Wings go wrong in loss to Utah? 5 thoughts

Published

on

Where did the Red Wings go wrong in loss to Utah? 5 thoughts


DETROIT — Just as the Detroit Red Wings looked like they were getting into a groove, they hit a stumbling block Wednesday in a 4-1 loss to the Utah Mammoth.

It’s only one game for a team that still sits atop the Atlantic Division, and none of the Red Wings players or coaches were going to panic in the aftermath. But a night after head coach Todd McLellan cautioned, “You can’t give it back,” after a strong run of recent play, a three-goal loss on home ice wasn’t the follow-up anyone was looking for.

Here’s what went wrong and some other thoughts from Wednesday night.

1. There was no doubt what McLellan thought the biggest issue was against the Mammoth.

Advertisement

“For me, the difference was obvious,” he said. “It was play around our net.”

And that was a theme on all four goals Detroit allowed. On the first, Simon Edvinsson drifted just off of Clayton Keller in the slot, giving him enough room to put home a big rebound off Cam Talbot. On the second, Ben Chiarot didn’t tie up Jack McBain on the back post. The third was a bit different, as no one really lost their man, but when Moritz Seider went to clear a trickling puck headed for a goal line, he ended up bouncing it off Talbot’s pad and right to Dylan Guenther for an easy goal. And on the fourth, Nate Danielson was a step or two off his check in the slot for a one-timer.

“It’s like sitting at your desk at school,” McLellan said. “You’re sitting there, but big deal. Are you doing any work? We’re in position. Do the work. Do the job. Get it done.”

McLellan also noted that Edvinsson and Danielson threw their heads back after the first and fourth goals, indicating they knew immediately what had gone wrong.

2. Though those goals against were ultimately the difference in the final score, Detroit also created far too little danger of its own against the Mammoth, especially at five-on-five.

Advertisement

Detroit’s top players, in particular, had uncharacteristic nights, with their first line (Larkin, Lucas Raymond and Emmitt Finnie) and the top defense pair (Seider and Edvinsson) all ending the night at minus-2, and with five-on-five expected goals shares below 25 percent, according to Natural Stat Trick.

Finnie got the Red Wings’ lone goal on a third-period power-play blast that briefly gave Detroit life, but there just weren’t enough serious chances in the second or third periods to really threaten Utah.

Although Detroit’s power play eventually scored in the third, a pair of second-period opportunities on the man advantage went by uneventfully when the score was still 1-0. The Red Wings didn’t record a shot on goal in the first of those two chances, and the top unit managed just one shot on goal in the second as well.

“We had looks, we had zone time, we just didn’t get it done,” Larkin said. “Didn’t get pucks through. Credit to them, they had a tight diamond, and I’m sure Todd will tell you both on their penalty kill and five-on-five, they probably won the net play tonight, and that was probably the story of the game.”

Certainly, the lack of any five-on-five offense is a more damning proposition than a 1-for-4 night on the power play. But situationally, in a one-goal game, those were big missed chances to swing momentum. Utah scored just 22 seconds after killing off the second penalty to make it 2-0, and that ultimately proved to be the game-winning goal.

Advertisement

Still, with just one even-strength goal in the last two games, the Red Wings are going to need more there, and that includes their top players, who have really carried them offensively to this point.

3. Wednesday’s loss dropped the Red Wings to 1-5 in the second half of back-to-backs this season.

It’s a small sample, but that stands out, even with the inherent challenge of playing on consecutive nights. It didn’t seem to slow Utah too much Wednesday, for example.

Larkin acknowledged the Red Wings will have to be better in those situations, particularly with more on the horizon. Detroit will play three more sets of back-to-backs in the next two weeks, with a home-and-home against the Washington Capitals this weekend, tilts against the Carolina Hurricanes and Toronto Maple Leafs the following weekend, and then the Winnipeg Jets and Pittsburgh Penguins at New Year’s.

I asked McLellan if there was anything he could put his finger on with the back-to-backs, and he pointed out that Detroit hadn’t scored first in any of those losses. That is true, and it’s probably a symptom and a cause.

Advertisement

Not scoring early has been a theme all season, though. Detroit has just 19 first-period goals in 35 games, which ranks 30th in the league, while giving up 28. The goals against number isn’t so bad — it’s still roughly league average — but it still translates to coming out of the first in a hole too often.

Cam Talbot hasn’t quite hit the same highs as earlier this season in recent games. (Rick Osentoski / Imagn Images)

4. Just as John Gibson seems to have found a bit of a rhythm for the Red Wings, Cam Talbot — who was Detroit’s rock in net early this season — has slipped into a bit of a funk. Not many of Wednesday’s goals were on him, but the rebound he gave up on the first goal (stemming from a low-percentage shot from along the boards) and then the trickling puck that led the third are atypical of where he was to start the season.

McLellan said he thinks the Red Wings have played better in front of Gibson of late, a reversal from early in the season, but that he’d “have a conversation (with Talbot) real quick, just let him know that we believe in him, because we do.”

5. After Tuesday night’s game, I noted Detroit had a tougher portion of the schedule coming up, with the back-to-back games against Washington and hosting a good Dallas Stars team to lead into Christmas.

Advertisement

Co-worker Dom Luszczyszyn pointed out to me that it’s actually more dramatic in the big picture. His model projects the Red Wings with the league’s toughest remaining schedule coming into Wednesday, and Detroit’s remaining opponents also have the second-highest collective win percentage.

That’s just one more reason that banking every point possible matters right now, especially from Eastern Conference foes they’ll be competing with for a playoff spot.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Utah organization urges harm reduction after executive order on fentanyl

Published

on

Utah organization urges harm reduction after executive order on fentanyl


Enter your email and we’ll send a secure one-click link to sign in.

ABC4 Utah is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.

Advertisement

ABC4 Utah is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.

Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending