Connect with us

California

California votes to keep forced prison labor

Published

on

California votes to keep forced prison labor


On November 5, Californians rejected a ballot measure banning forced prison labor, voting instead to keep the practice legal in state prisons.

Proposition 6, which moved to eliminate the “constitutional provision allowing involuntary servitude for incarcerated persons,” is projected to fail, the Associated Press reported. With 72 percent of the vote counted, 54 percent of California voters said no to the ballot measure.

The Golden State’s constitution has what some describe as a “slavery loophole.” While slavery is illegal in the state, California’s 199,000 prisoners can be required to work jobs that earn them less than $1 an hour. Prisoners who decline these jobs can face severe consequences, such as delays in their parole eligibility, Politico reported.

One of the critical jobs that prisoners can be required to work is fighting wildfires. While salaried firefighters in California receive $74,000 on average plus benefits, prisoners receive $2 a day and an extra $1 an hour when fighting active fires.

Advertisement
Inmate firefighters from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation at the Station Fire Incident Command Post in the Lake View Terrace area of Los Angeles on September 3, 2009. On Tuesday, Californians voted against…


Jae C. Hong/Associated Press

The Anti-Recidivism Coalition, a grassroots organization working to end mass incarceration in California, led the push to remove the “slavery loophole” from the state’s constitution.

Esteban Nunez, ARC’s chief strategy consultant and lobbyist, spoke with Newsweek about the result, saying voters might not have understood the magnitude of the proposition because of its language.

“One of the most significant challenges was the ballot title and summary itself, which used the term ‘involuntary servitude’ without referencing ‘slavery,’” Nunez said.

“Despite our advocacy for including ‘slavery’ in the ballot language to capture the full moral weight of the issue, the official language used only ‘involuntary servitude.’ This choice likely diluted the urgency of the measure for voters who may not fully understand the historical context and human rights implications of forced labor in prisons,” he continued.

Nunez added that ARC was working to convince people that “even within a carceral system, forced labor is inhumane, counterproductive, and fundamentally wrong.”

Advertisement

He said: “The focus here needs to be on the benefits of rehabilitation over forced labor. Studies and real-life examples show that when incarcerated individuals have the opportunity to pursue education, therapy, and voluntary work, they are far more likely to re-enter society as law-abiding, contributing citizens.

“Forced labor, however, disrupts these opportunities, perpetuating cycles of harm, poverty, and recidivism.”

Prisoners cutting down trees along the Highway 29 while fighting a wildfire near Calistoga, California, on October 12, 2017. As a ballot measure to end forced prison labor did not pass, Californian prisoners could still…


Jae C. Hong/Associated Press

Nevadans also had the chance to vote on an antislavery ballot measure on Tuesday, and unlike their neighbors to the West, voters in the Silver State chose to abolish slavery in their prison system.

Nevada’s Question 4, which moved to repeal the state’s provision allowing slavery and involuntary servitude as punishment for a crime, passed with 61 percent of the vote, the Associated Press reported.

Alabama and Tennessee also recently removed provisions for forced prison labor from their state constitutions.

Advertisement

Proposition 6 was not the only prison-related measure on California’s ballot. Californians also voted on Proposition 36, which moved to “increase penalties for repeated theft offenses and certain drug crimes, including some involving fentanyl,” and “create a drug court treatment program for people with multiple drug possession convictions.”

As Newsweek previously reported, the “tough on crime” measure received support from Californians who wanted a stronger response from their government on street drug use and what they saw as a growing homelessness problem, as Proposition 36 would enable law enforcement to act more decisively against repeat offenders and drug-related offenses.

Anne Marie Schubert, a co-chair of the coalition supporting the measure, said, “This is a resounding message that Californians are ready to have safer communities.”

Do you have a story we should be covering? Do you have any questions about this article? Contact  LiveNews@newsweek.com.

Advertisement



Source link

California

California lawmaker introduces bill to protect wildlife from euthanasia, create coexistence program

Published

on

California lawmaker introduces bill to protect wildlife from euthanasia, create coexistence program


A Southern California state senator has proposed a new law that would prevent euthanasia in the state’s wildlife just a month after a mother bear was put down for swiping at a woman in Monrovia, feet away from where her two cubs were located. 

The legislation, SB 1135, which was introduced by Sen. Catherine Blakespear (D-Encinitas), calls for the establishment of a state program that promotes the coexistence with wildlife and codifies a wolf-livestock coexistence and compensation program. The move comes two years after funding for a similar wildlife coexistence program expired. 

“We can and must responsibly support people and wild animals to exist in a California where we are all under growing pressures and cumulative threats like extreme heat, frequent drought and intense wildfires that animals respond to by moving in search of resources to survive,” Sen. Blakespear said in a statement. “That means investing in science-based, situation-specific, proactive strategies to minimize negative interactions and prevent escalation to conflicts that pose risks for people and animals. SB 1135 proposes a program to better protect people, wildlife and communities.”

Blondie, the mother bear that was euthanized in March after it swiped at a woman in Monrovia.

Advertisement

Neighbor Photo


The proposed coexistence program, which would be allocated nearly $50 million through the state’s 2026-27 budget, would build on the previous version, which deployed trained regional human-wildlife conflict staff around the state. The absence was noted by CDFW leaders during a state Assembly meeting in January, according to Blakespear. 

“Over the last five years, wildlife incident reports logged by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) increased by 31 percent and calls, emails and field contacts rose by 58 percent,” Blakespear’s proposal says. 

She noted the recent headline across the state, including “Blondie,” the Monrovia mother bear who was captured and put down by wildlife officials in March after it swiped at a woman near the home it was living under with its two cubs

Advertisement

The home in question belongs to Richard Franco. He, along with many other Monrovia residents, has documented his encounters with bears over the years, even setting up a system of trail cameras to track the bears’ movements. 

“Getting to know her, you could see what a devoted mother she was,” Franco said. “She was always building a nest.”

Read more: Orphaned bear cubs taken to San Diego for care after mom is euthanized for attacking people

screenshot-2026-03-15-214018.png

One of the two bear cubs captured by California Department of Fish and Wildlife officials in Monrovia on Sunday, March 15, 2026.

CBS LA

Advertisement


Franco and many of his neighbors were angered upon learning that CDFW officials had euthanized Blondie after her capture, which they credited to the fact that she had swiped at the woman days earlier and another person in 2025.

“Forcing them out, and then euthanizing the mom was just traumatic for us,” said one Monrovia couple. “It was just tragic, and there was no need for it; it was completely unnecessary.”

Situations like this are what caught Blakespear’s attention, leading to her proposal last week. 

“It is really my desire to make sure that wild places stay wild, and not be having to resort to lethal measures like killing bears or killing wolves,” Blakespear said, while speaking with CBS LA. “We need to have a program that is up and going so we can be educating people.”

The program calls for focus on public education, maintaining a statewide incident reporting system and deploying devices like barriers, noise and light machines and other technology that would deter predators from places where they shouldn’t be. 

Advertisement

SB 1135 passed on a 5-1 vote and will now be considered by the Senate Appropriations Committee. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

480 ducks find homes after an emergency rescue operation in Riverside County

Published

on

480 ducks find homes after an emergency rescue operation in Riverside County


Only a week after animal services officials in Riverside County discovered 480 ducks living in crowded, outdoor cages, all of the ducks have been adopted, the result of a what authorities are describing as a massive “teamwork and coordination” effort.

The Riverside County Department of Animal Services found the ducks Tuesday after investigating overcrowding conditions at a property in unincorporated Riverside County, according to the agency. The birds were taken to the San Jacinto Valley Animal Campus, where officials urgently called on the public and rescue organizations to help place them beginning Wednesday.

According to a social media update from the San Jacinto Valley Animal Campus, all 480 ducks have been rescued or adopted, marking one of the largest single intake-and-placement efforts for the department in over a decade.

“This large-scale operation required extensive teamwork and coordination across our department,” Riverside County officials said in the social media update.

Advertisement

Animal service officials were not available to explain who had adopted the animals and whether they were adopted as pets or food. But Daniel Markichevich told KABC that he and his fiancée Savannah Burgardt visited the San Jacinto shelter on Wednesday and planned on adopting 20 ducks for their San Jacinto property.

“We have a 3.5-acre farm, so they will just go right into the area and enjoy, and we’ll get out there and look at them, eat their eggs and have a whole full life for them,” said Markichevich, who recently completed construction on a pond in their backyard.

An animal sanctuary in Vacaville, dubbed the Funky Chicken Rescue, took in eight of the ducks, according to a social media post.

Officials said the original owner of the ducks had intended to create a sanctuary for the animals but animal control officers ultimately determined that conditions required intervention, citing improper husbandry and concerns about the number of birds being housed.

Before taking in the ducks, the animal services agency coordinated with the California Department of Food and Agriculture to test a sample of the ducks for zoonotic diseases, according to the county. All results came back negative but early assessments indicated the birds had not received adequate care, according to authorities.

Advertisement

“Overcrowding can contribute to stress and decreased immune function,” Itzel Vizcarra, chief veterinarian for the county animal services agency, said in a statement. “Inadequate nutrition, particularly vitamin A deficiency, can impair the lining of the digestive tract, predisposing birds to inflammation and secondary illness.”

The swift placement effort was supported in part by community donations, including more than 70 bags of waterfowl feed provided by a local business, according to the San Jacinto Valley Animal Campus.

While the ducks now have new homes, officials said the investigation into overcrowding conditions at the original property is ongoing.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California couple charged with murder in death of toddler skip court

Published

on

California couple charged with murder in death of toddler skip court


A Bay Area couple charged in the murder of a 2-year-old girl who reportedly overdosed on fentanyl earlier this year failed to appear in court last week to face the charges.

The tragic incident occurred just after 5 a.m. on Feb. 12, according to the San Francisco County District Attorney’s Office.

Officers with the San Francisco Police Department responded to an apartment in the 3800 block of 18th Street, near Mission Dolores Park, after receiving a 911 call reporting that a child was not breathing.

“Medics arrived at the location and pronounced the two-year-old child deceased,” the DA’s office said in a news release. “Medics observed signs of rigor mortis and lividity, indicating the child had been dead for several hours.”

Advertisement
A woman and her boyfriend in San Francisco have been charged with second-degree murder in the fatal overdose death of a 2-year-old girl on Feb. 12, 2026. (Google Maps)

Responding officers noted that Michelle Price, 38, the girl’s mother, was slurring her speech and had “an emotionless demeanor,” according to court documents. Investigators also observed drug paraphernalia in the apartment, including three pipes, lighters and torches, a used Narcan container, white powder ultimately identified as fentanyl, bottles of spoiled milk and stained sheets on the bed.

Price was arrested for child endangerment.

Her boyfriend, Steve Ramirez, 43, allegedly attempted to flee the apartment on a bicycle, leading police on a chase during which an officer was injured. At the time of his arrest, Ramirez was reportedly in possession of a pipe inside a bag on his bike. Two additional pipes with burnt residue were also found nearby, investigators said.

Blood samples taken from Price and Ramirez at the time of their arrests showed high levels of methamphetamine and fentanyl in their systems, according to the DA’s office.

An autopsy performed by the San Francisco Medical Examiner’s Office revealed no obvious signs of physical injury to the toddler. However, toxicology testing showed lethal levels of fentanyl, as well as naloxone, commonly known as Narcan, in the child’s bloodstream.

Advertisement

“The cause of death was determined to be acute fentanyl poisoning,” the release stated.

Price was initially charged with felony child endangerment, possession of fentanyl and possession of drug paraphernalia. Ramirez faced the same charges, along with an additional count of resisting, obstructing and delaying a peace officer.

Over the objections of prosecutors, both Price and Ramirez were allowed to remain out of custody ahead of their arraignments.

The overdose-reversal drug Narcan was reportedly found to have been used on a 2-year-old girl in San Francisco who died from a fentanyl overdose prior to police arriving at the apartment.(AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)

On April 15, San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins announced an amended complaint charging the couple with second-degree murder, marking the first time such charges have been brought in a fatal fentanyl overdose case in the county.

“There wasn’t really anywhere safe for this child to be inside of this home,” Jenkins said during a press conference announcing the charges. “This is a moment in time where people have to realize that we take these situations very seriously and where, I believe, parents who knowingly possess fentanyl, who understand its lethality and the danger it poses, allow their children to be exposed to it, this is something that can come with respect to accountability if a child dies.”

At the April 16 arraignment, where both defendants failed to appear, Price’s attorney told the court she may have experienced transportation issues. An attorney representing Ramirez said he did not know his client’s whereabouts, according to KTLA’s Bay Area sister station KRON.

Advertisement

While both attorneys said the couple was mourning the loss of the child and struggling with addiction, Ramirez’s lawyer accused the district attorney’s office of turning the case into a media circus, claiming the publicity caused his client to panic.

The judge subsequently issued bench warrants for both Price and Ramirez. It remains unclear whether either has since been taken into custody.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending