Idaho
Idaho Secretary of State removing 36 likely noncitizens as registered voters, says some voted • Idaho Capital Sun
Editor’s note: This is the second story of a two-part series focused on noncitizen voting in Idaho elections. The previous story, focused on a proposed constitutional amendment to ban noncitizen voting, published last week.
The Idaho Secretary of State Office is in the process of removing 36 “very likely” noncitizens from Idaho’s registered voter rolls.
Some of those noncitizens voted in past elections in Idaho, Secretary of State Phil McGrane told the Idaho Capital Sun, but he didn’t specify how many.
No noncitizens voted in Idaho’s statewide primary election this May, he said, and state election officials are working to ensure that no noncitizens vote in the upcoming November general election.
“There are a number of them that do have some form of voting history — whether it’s in local elections or some other election,” McGrane told the Sun. “And at this point, we’re handling each of those on a case-by-case basis” with law enforcement and county clerks.
Amid years of false claims about droves of noncitizens voting in federal elections, Idaho’s top election official sought to make clear that noncitizen voting in Idaho — an Idaho and federal crime — is rare, and that election officials are working to bolster election security systems to prevent noncitizen votes, under an executive order signed this summer.
“Out of the million plus registered voters we started with, we’re down to 10 thousandths of a percent in terms of this number. … This is very rare, it’s very limited,” McGrane told the Sun about noncitizen votes in Idaho.
The Idaho Secretary of State’s Office is now working through due process work to ensure that those people flagged were actually noncitizens, he said, like allowing people to prove citizenship.
The Idaho Secretary of State’s Office has talked with law enforcement offices, including the federal U.S. Attorney’s Office, about “any enforcement mechanisms that need to be put in place,” McGrane said.
How many noncitizens have voted in Idaho elections?
McGrane wouldn’t offer a direct number on how many of the 36 likely noncitizens, who are registered voters, had voted in past elections. He generally said some had — but not in this May’s statewide primary election, featuring state legislative, congressional and local races.
Since January 10, 2020, in Ada County, 78 registered voters were removed for not being a U.S. citizen, according to a report Ada County Clerk Trent Tripple shared with the Sun, which included data as recent as Oct. 4, 2024.
One case, in 2020, was the only instance of noncitizen voting in Ada County that Tripple knew of and the county’s records show, he told the Sun. That case involved a Canadian citizen — who Tripple declined to identify — and was referred to prosecutors. He said he didn’t know the case’s outcome.
“I would hope that citizens in Idaho know that — in my estimation — the will of the voter has been reflected in every single election that I know of, based off those that are legally eligible to vote,” Tripple told the Sun. “And so I push back on the notion that there’s people that are not allowed to vote that are affecting the outcomes of our elections.”
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
How else do Idaho election officials clean the voter rolls?
Beyond just preventing noncitizens from voting, Tripple stressed that local Idaho election officials are always “extremely active” in cleaning the voter rolls for a range of reasons, including when people die or move.
Ada County. (Courtesy of Ada County)
The report Tripple shared, spanning almost five years, said more than 29,000 voters in general in Ada County were removed for maintenance, along with over 9,800 for being deceased, nearly 3,800 for being registered more than once, another 604 for having felonies, among other reasons.
“I think it’s a misnomer for people to think that there’s a goal out there for a perfect election, and that we’re going to achieve it at some point in the future,” Tripple told the Sun. “This is an imperfect process for us. We have rules in place if we find them, and we’re actively pursuing anybody that should not be allowed to vote on a regular basis and removing them from voter rolls.”
Every two years, Idaho election officials purge the registered voter rolls. Idaho law requires county clerks to cancel registrations for voters who didn’t vote in the past four years.
In 2023, over 74,000 Idaho registered voters were removed “due to inactivity, change of address, or who were otherwise determined to be ineligible to vote,” according to a previous Idaho Secretary of State’s Office news release.
“We have already been doing this, and our numbers,” McGrane told the Sun, referring to noncitizen votes, “the fact that we’re at such a teeny, tiny fraction of a percent of instances, shows that Idaho has been doing it well — well in advance of this being part of the national discourse.”
GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump repeats false claims about droves of noncitizens voting
Former U.S. President Donald Trump, running again as the Republican presidential nominee, has repeatedly said noncitizens are being registered to vote, and falsely claimed that noncitizens swayed the 2016 election — which he won — and the 2020 election — which he lost, the Washington Post reported earlier this year.
This election cycle, Trump is continuing to make similar debunked claims.
But in a fact check of the September presidential debate, National Public Radio reported there is “no credible evidence” that noncitizens vote in federal elections, “or that there is an effort underway to illegally register undocumented immigrants to vote this election.”
In the Washington Post’s March 2024 review of the conservative Heritage Foundation’s database of election-fraud prosecution cases, 85 cases — from 2002 to 2023 — involved allegations of noncitizen voting.
“Every legitimate study ever done on the question shows that voting by noncitizens in state and federal elections is vanishingly rare,” the Brennan Center for Justice reported in April.
While a few local U.S. governments have allowed noncitizens to vote in local elections (none of which are in Idaho), no states let noncitizens vote in statewide elections, the Sun previously reported.
U.S. citizenship is required to vote in federal and Idaho elections.
How Idaho bolstered noncitizen vote prevention processes, under recent executive order
In July, McGrane and Idaho Gov. Brad Little signed an executive order that shores up processes to prevent noncitizen voting. Idaho elections already have strong mechanisms in place to ensure noncitizens don’t vote, the Sun reported.
2024 Idaho election preview: Only citizens can vote. Why amend Idaho’s Constitution?
The order — distinct from a proposed constitutional amendment that would ban noncitizen voting in Idaho elections, where citizenship is already required — was aimed at bolstering voter confidence, McGrane previously told the Sun.
Already, The Secretary of State’s office works with the Idaho Department of Transportation to check voter records. But the executive order called for additional security by partnering with Idaho State Police and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to check immigration records, among the order’s other provisions.
One of the big changes for the Idaho Secretary of State’s Office stemming from the executive order is securing an agreement to verify citizenship data with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s database, McGrane told the Sun.
In July, the Secretary of State’s Office pulled the entire list of Idaho’s over 1 million registered voters, and had the Idaho Department of Transportation do a full comparison.
The initial review flagged 700 potential noncitizens on voter rolls, McGrane told the Sun. But the number of probable noncitizens fell significantly once officials validated the citizenship of over 600 people flagged for potential noncitizenship, down to 36 “very likely” noncitizens who were Idaho registered voters, he said.
“Maybe they were a noncitizen at one point. But … by the time they were registering to vote, they were actually citizens. It just hadn’t been updated on their driver’s license records,” McGrane told the Sun.
And Tripple urged caution overinterpreting the higher potential noncitizen vote estimate. That list, from the Idaho Department of Transportation, flags people as potential noncitizens for many reasons like, for instance, registering for a driver’s license years ago — before the federal STAR Card Act asked for birth certificates.
The “overwhelming majority” proved to be “false positives” once further investigated, he said.
“Spending that time to go through that is — it’s time consuming. But we do it because we know that people want to have trust in the elections process,” Tripple said.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
Idaho
Bond revoked for indicted Idaho mother
PAYETTE — A Payette mom’s bond was revoked Tuesday after she was charged with suffocating her twin children earlier this month and is believed to pose a danger to the life of her newborn child.
The case, which has drawn national headlines, concerns Andrea Renee Shaw, a 23-year-old Payette mother who in May 2025 said her 18-month-old fraternal twins died the same day, after receiving routine childhood vaccinations. In January, Shaw joined as a plaintiff in a federal lawsuit filed by Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine organization founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., with several other plaintiffs claiming vaccine injury or death.
Kennedy, who now serves as secretary of Health and Human Services, is no longer part of the group after taking on the cabinet position, as was reported by the Associated Press.
In Idaho, the twins’ deaths prompted a 14-month investigation by the Payette County Sheriff’s Department. On June 29, the investigation yielded a grand jury indictment of Shaw on two counts of first-degree murder by suffocation. If convicted, Shaw can be punished by up to life in prison or the death penalty, and the court would have the ability to order the penalties be served consecutively, or back to back.
Tuesday’s arraignment at the Payette County Courthouse was primarily attended by Shaw’s relatives and members of the media. Payette County Judge Kiley Stuchlik, who serves Idaho’s Third Judicial District, presided.
A key consideration for Stuchlik on Tuesday was a request from Joseph Filicetti, the legal counsel for Shaw, to have her bond reduced from $2 million to $100,000. Filicetti said this would allow for Shaw to care for a newborn girl, who, according to court documents, was born by caesarean section on June 25, four days prior to Shaw’s grand jury indictment.
State prosecutors objected to the motion for bond reduction, noting at hand was a potential death penalty case and asserting, unlike her husband, Shaw’s story repeatedly changed during questioning. Prosecuting Attorney Mike Duke said releasing Shaw would ultimately put the newborn’s safety at risk.
“That child is the most at risk. We do not think she should be allowed to be anywhere near any children, let alone her own children,” Duke said.
Stuchlik decided to revoke bond entirely, stating Shaw posed a “risk of safety” to the newborn child that was not known to Stuchlik or prosecutors when the $2 million bond was initially set.
Also for consideration Tuesday was a request to have grand jury transcripts of witness testimony provided to prosecutors and defense counsel to prepare their respective cases.
Idaho
Idaho is home to the nation's first DarkSky Reserve. Now it's home to the nations first DarkSky Certified Resort
Idaho
Idaho Falls City Council delays vote on proposed alcohol ordinance – Local News 8
IDAHO FALLS, Idaho (KIFI) – A controversy is brewing as the City of Idaho Falls reviews its alcohol ordinance.
The goal is to consolidate four existing ordinances for beer, wine and liquor into a single law and ensure compliance with state code.
However, at its meeting last Thursday, the Idaho Falls City Council unanimously voted to remove the proposed ordinance from its agenda, in order to receive and consider additional public comment.
The proposed ordinance would:
1. Require commercial establishments selling, dispensing or permitting consumption of alcohol – including beer, wine or liquor – to have an alcohol license, alcohol catering permit or a charitable event permit.
2. Business events with 20 or less employees consuming alcohol at the business would be allowed.
3. Require alcohol servers to complete training every three years.
4. Individuals who violate the law could be charged with a misdemeanor.
Idaho Falls City Council President Jim Francis said the changes were the culmination of months of collaboration between law enforcement, business owners and city attorneys.
“We wanted to provide a safe environment – the primary point here – for public gatherings,” Francis said. “We recognize that certain antiquated elements of the current code are overly restrictive and needed to be addressed. We wanted to make the code more accessible to the public. We needed to address over-pouring issues. We wanted to reduce penalties where possible for violations, particularly the first offenses, and yet make the code clear enough to be enforceable consistently by law enforcement.”
But City Council Member John Radford said the changes represent an overreach by city government.
“I believe it’s a bad policy. What problem are we solving in the name of trying to solve a non-problem?” Radford said. “We’re becoming big brother around alcohol in your private property. I’m concerned that landlords will be at risk of being charged with a misdemeanor if they knowingly, which I made sure that was in there, because that is what we’ve been talking about, allowed people to drink in our business. We will be outside the norm of Idaho cities. This is a big step, and I don’t think the public has weighed in on this.”
At a City Council Work Session on June 1, Idaho Falls Chief of Police Bryce Johnson cited an increase in alcohol-related crime – particularly downtown – as a reason for the changes.
“DUI is there, but this would include sexual assaults, assaults, batteries, disturbances, urination, public vandalism, shooting – all sorts of crimes,” Johnson said.
But business owners are concerned about the potential impact on commercial enterprises.
“The ordinance doesn’t address the real problem – which is people drinking … at one event and then showing up in a bar or restaurant already hammered and causing problems anyway,” ” said Terri Ireland, representing the Idaho Falls Downtown Merchants Association. “The industry is really well-regulated by state and local laws already.”
The City of Idaho Falls began the process of updating its alcohol ordinance in January 2026, seeking input from community stakeholders.
Multiple community members spoke out about the ordinance.
For more in-depth information, you can read the full 39-page proposed alcohol ordinance here.
-
Texas5 minutes agoTexas AG secures 23andMe bankruptcy settlement after 2023 data breach
-
Utah11 minutes agoMuslim man in Utah was targeted in stabbing because of his religion, police say
-
Vermont17 minutes agoHazy, hot, and humid: Wildfire plumes give southern Vermont skies an odd glow
-
Virginia23 minutes agoFive charged after Virginia Beach Police conduct human trafficking operation
-
Wisconsin35 minutes agoFlood relief grant applications now open for nonprofits, churches in Northeast Wisconsin
-
West Virginia41 minutes agoNew law allows employers to provide benefits for independent contractors in West Virginia
-
Wyoming47 minutes agoElection Q&A: Jessica Crowder for Wyoming House District 43
-
Crypto53 minutes agoBlackrock Becomes World’s First $15 Trillion Asset Manager, Unleashes Tokenization Blitz

