Massachusetts
Mass. is a national leader in keeping food waste out of landfills, study finds
Scientists and government officials increasingly recognize food waste as a major contributor to climate change. Across the globe, producing and disposing of uneaten food accounts for about half of the greenhouse gas emissions from the entire food system.
Massachusetts was among the first states to pass regulations curbing food waste, and according to new research published in the journal Science, it’s the only state where the rules are working.
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) Commissioner Bonnie Heiple said the state is proud to be recognized as a national leader.
“This has been a long time coming,” she said.
In the United States, About 35% of food produced is never eaten. Much of it winds up in landfills where it gives off methane, a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change, as it decomposes. Methane emissions from Massachusetts landfills have the same climate impacts as about 116,000 cars on the road for a year.
To stem the flow of lettuce (and other food) to landfills, nine states and a handful of cities and towns have enacted food waste bans — laws and regulations that prohibit sending organic waste to landfills or incinerators.
Massachusetts was among the first five states to enact a food waste ban — the others were California, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Vermont. Massachusetts’ first food waste ban, enacted a decade ago, required any business producing more than a ton of food waste per week to keep it out of landfills or incinerators. Instead, businesses were told to divert edible surplus food to charities or food recovery services, and send food waste to compost facilities or anaerobic digesters that turn it into energy. Massachusetts enacted a stricter ban in 2022, lowering the threshold to a half-ton of food waste per week.
In the new study, researchers looked at data from five states from 2006-2018, the years with the best data available. They found that food waste bans had no effect in California, Connecticut, Vermont and Rhode Island during that time; only Massachusetts saw a significant decline — about 7% — in food waste sent to landfills and incinerators.
Massachusetts has continued to increase food waste diversion since then. Before the first ban took effect in 2014, the state was diverting about 100,000 tons of food waste from landfills and incinerators, according to state data. That number now stands at about 380,000 tons per year, a nearly fourfold increase.
“That downward decline in food waste has caused us to reduce our emissions — really slash our methane emissions from food waste — by more than 25%,” said Heiple.
By 2030, the state’s goal is to divert 780,000 tons of food waste per year.
The study’s authors suggested three possible reasons for Massachusetts’ success: simple regulations, affordable options for managing food waste, and stronger enforcement and monitoring than other states.
“These bans can work, and when they are successful, they can substantially reduce landfill waste,” said Fiorentina Zoi Anglou, a PhD candidate at the University of Texas, Austin and the lead author on the study. “These laws are important, and they hold a lot of potential. But in order for them to be truly effective, they need more than just good intentions, they need careful implementation.”
Despite the high marks from researchers, environmental groups are pushing Massachusetts officials to do more.
A 2024 report from MASSPIRG and other environmental advocacy groups found the state fell 20% short of its food waste diversion goal in 2020. The authors noted the state will need to double its rate of organic waste diversion to meet its ambitious 2030 goal. The report suggested better public education, tax incentives for food donation and renewed investments in composting.
“We appreciate the efforts of the DEP,” said MASSPIRG Executive Director Janet Domenitz, but she added, it’s not enough. “We’re still burying and burning over a million tons of food waste a year here, and that makes methane — the worst kind of contributor to climate change.”
John Fischer, deputy division director for solid waste at MassDEP, said the state’s 2030 goal is “aggressive.” To reach it, he said, regulators will need to start focusing on food waste from homes.
“We’re at a pivot point,” he said. While continuing to divert commercial food waste, his department is beginning to shift attention to residents. “That will be proportionally more of our focus going forward.”
Massachusetts
Massachusetts native earns Patriots collaboration through social media design campaign
FOXBOROUGH, Mass. (WJAR) — Building a brand, sharing her funky graphic designs and garnering the attention of major brands and professional sports teams, Kate Weinberg has proven the power of social media, amassing more than 500,000 followers across TikTok and Instagram.
Her latest campaign, designing fresh merchandise for the NFL, has now resulted in a massive collaboration with the Patriots.
“The whole team has been amazing,” Weinberg told NBC 10 News. “They’ve trusted in my creative vision the whole way through.”
The collaboration is the result of months of planning, designing, and editing.
“It was hard to pull together so quickly,” she continued. “From coming up with the design and getting the production to happen and making sure they were approved by the league, there’s so much I’ve been learning.”
Weinberg says as a Massachusetts native and generational Pats fan, inspiration came naturally — the designs feature lobsters, sailboats, and everything uniquely New England.
“I try to make every design unique and tell a story with it … the story of the team,” Weinberg said.
They were placed on display just in time for the Patriots’ 2026 playoff debut.
“They went on display, Friday, right before the big game. Sunday was the big sales day, I think they sold out at 2 p.m.,” Weinberg said.
She said come this Sunday, she’ll be proudly repping her merch, while rooting for the Pats as they take on the Texans at 3 p.m.
Massachusetts
Could we quit complaining and be Massachusetts boosters … just this once?
Can I hear just a few positive things in 2026? Amanda Gutierres of the new women’s soccer team, Boston Legacy FC, at Gillette Stadium. Boston Legacy
For one year — just one year! — What if we all tried to be Mass. boosters, rather than Mass. criticizers, Mass. fault-finders or plain old Massholes?
What if we made that a New Year’s Resolution that we actually stick with until December?
If you’re a resident of Massachusetts, you can undoubtedly add to this list of problems that our state has: high taxes, pricey housing, unreliable public transit, bad traffic, cold weather, elected officials emitting hot air and residents voting with their feet by moving.
But if there was ever a year to look at the Dunkin’ cup as half full, I’d argue that 2026 is it.
A partial list of good stuff we could be bragging about would include:
• An NFL team that won its first playoff game with a quarterback who could be the season’s MVP, and an NBA team that surprisingly has a solid chance of making it to the playoffs.
• Boston is continuing to get better at enjoying winter, with Frostival and Winteractive. A Ferris wheel on the Greenway? A “street snowboarding” contest on City Hall Plaza? I’ll be there!
• The inaugural season of Boston Legacy FC, our new National Women’s Soccer League team, opens in March.
• Seven FIFA World Cup games will be held in Foxborough in June.
• Marking the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence on the Fourth of July and other Revolutionary happenings throughout the year.
• Later in July, a fleet of tall ships from around the world arrives in Boston Harbor for Sail Boston.
• Worcester and Auburn are getting ready to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the birth of modern rocketry, with Robert Goddard’s early tests in 1926. In other nerdy news, the MIT Museum has plans to mark the 50th birthday of the biotech industry in Cambridge. Just two of many major industries born in Massachusetts.
Most residents of other states would view two or three of those things as opportunities to boast or back-pat.
They’d invite friends and relatives from all over to come for a visit, and see it as an opportunity to show off their state’s positives — or at least to appreciate the work it took to bring these things together in a single year.
Maybe we should, too.
Traffic will be bad at times. Hotel and Airbnb prices will skyrocket.
And you could live up to the stereotype by bemoaning that. Or you could see 2026 as a pretty great year to live in Massachusetts.
Massachusetts
Massachusetts woman denied a license to carry firearms wins her appeal
A local woman who was denied a license to carry firearms because of her husband’s “violent and aggressive behavior” has won her appeal in state court.
Barbara Guinane applied to the Manchester-by-the-Sea police chief for an LTC more than three years ago.
The police chief ended up ruling that Guinane was unsuitable and denied the LTC application due to her husband. The chief noted her husband’s violent disputes with neighbors, resulting in police responses to the couple’s home, criminal charges, restraining orders against him, and his LTC being suspended.
Ultimately, the chief argued that issuing an LTC to Guinane would allow her husband to have access to weapons.
After Guinane lost her appeal multiple times in court, she brought her case to Massachusetts Appeals Court.
“We agree with Guinane that her husband’s conduct did not, in these circumstances, furnish adequate statutory grounds for the chief to find her unsuitable,” the Appeals Court ruled. “Therefore, without reaching any Second Amendment issue, we reverse.”
The Appeals Court ordered the police chief to grant Guinane’s LTC application.
She had applied for her LTC in October of 2022. Earlier that year, a neighbor had called 911 to report that Guinane’s husband “came to (the neighbor’s) property yelling about trash cans and was carrying a baseball bat and then smashed a light pole in a fit of rage.”
When police responded, they found the Guinanes sitting on their front porch, where the husband told them, “I know I smashed a light.” He explained that he believed someone had broken into his shed, and he had lost his temper.
The husband was criminally charged with vandalizing property, and the neighbors obtained a harassment prevention order against him. The chief also suspended the husband’s LTC.
Then, the husband and a second neighbor had a verbal altercation, leading to the husband being charged with threatening to commit a crime, and with assault with intent to intimidate based on the victim’s race, religion, color and/or disability. The second neighbor also obtained a restraining order against him.
When Guinane applied for her own LTC, the chief found her unsuitable because of his concern that her husband would have access to the weapons. The chief acknowledged that Guinane herself had no criminal record.
The chief agreed that if Guinane were not married to her husband, “she would be a suitable person.” The chief nevertheless ruled that “it may be a threat to public safety” to issue an LTC to Guinane.
On the other side, Guinane testified that she had taken a gun safety course and had learned “how to use guns safely and to keep them at home also safely.” She had obtained a biometric gun safe and a biometric trigger lock, operable only with her fingerprints, so that “nobody else can use it.”
She further testified that she was a licensed manicurist who operated a nail salon out of their house. Customers sometimes paid her in cash.
In this most recent appeal, the Appeals Court ruled that the chief had no reasonable ground for denying Guinane’s application.
“Although the chief was understandably concerned about public safety, there was no reliable information about behavior by the applicant suggesting that, if issued a license, she would create a risk to public safety or a risk of danger to herself or others,” the court wrote.
“There is no evidence that she engaged in violent or aggressive behavior, or that she assisted or contributed to her husband’s past violent and aggressive behavior, or that she engaged in behavior suggesting that she might be negligent in securing her firearms as required by law,” the court added. “Nor was there reliable evidence that she intended to or might be forced to make firearms available to her husband or any other prohibited or unsuitable person.”
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology1 week agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Montana3 days agoService door of Crans-Montana bar where 40 died in fire was locked from inside, owner says
-
Delaware5 days agoMERR responds to dead humpback whale washed up near Bethany Beach
-
Dallas, TX5 days agoAnti-ICE protest outside Dallas City Hall follows deadly shooting in Minneapolis
-
Dallas, TX1 week agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Iowa1 week agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Virginia3 days agoVirginia Tech gains commitment from ACC transfer QB