Iranians were able to access more than 1,500 Binance accounts last year, and $1.7 billion was transferred from two of them to terrorist proxies, The New York Times reported Monday.
Crypto
Cryptocurrency after the European Union’s MiCA regulation | Opinion
Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.
The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) marks a significant milestone in the European Union’s journey toward regulating the rapidly evolving crypto market. Its timeline and provisions hold immense importance for both crypto businesses and investors. As we approach crucial dates, starting with the application of stablecoin provisions from June 30, 2024, and the complete application of MiCA on December 30, 2024, the crypto landscape is undergoing a transformative phase.
Over the next two years
MiCA’s staggered timelines and transitional periods, extending up to June 30, 2026, imply a period of fragmented implementation across the EU and European Economic Area (EEA). Jurisdictions such as Ireland (12 VASPs), Spain (96 VASPs), and Germany (12 VASPs) will grant a 12-month transitional period. In contrast, other jurisdictions will offer more extended periods, such as France (107 VASPs) with 18 months, while Lithuania (588 VASPs) will likely only grant five months. This transitional phase will prompt market consolidation as not all existing service providers will secure MiCA licenses. Many will look to capitalize on this interim period before winding down operations.
The race among EU/EEA jurisdictions to become the primary hub for crypto activities intensifies, with jurisdictions like France, Malta, and Ireland competing to take the top spot. However, regulator readiness and compliance for crypto-asset businesses pose significant challenges. Regulators are facing an adjustment period to upskill their staff to process MiCA applications, particularly in jurisdictions with high applicant volumes. The complexity of various business models, encompassing numerous products unfamiliar to regulators, exacerbates this challenge. The general lack of expertise to authorize and supervise this sector requires substantial training efforts.
Challenges for crypto businesses
MiCA, coupled with the vast array of related Level-2 measures (many of which still need to be finalized) and other applicable EU instruments such as the anti-money laundering laws, the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), and the Electronic Money Directive (EMD), create a complex regulatory framework. Understanding what provisions apply to each entity type and what documentation needs to be implemented will be challenging for some.
The delisting of crypto-assets, particularly stablecoins, from EU exchanges due to their issuers’ failure to obtain their licenses on time will pose considerable hurdles and limit the availability of certain assets for consumers.
Adapting to MiCA will strain many entities and require substantial investments in technological infrastructure. The Travel Rule, a requirement in which information must be shared between VASPs with each crypto transaction, also comes into effect at the same time as MiCA. The Travel Rule mandates that CASPs transfer a substantial amount of information about the originator. This includes their address, personal identification number, and customer identification number. In rare cases, it may even require the disclosure of the originator’s date and place of birth. This adds another layer of complexity, further highlighting the need for harmonization within the EU and solutions to comply with the Travel Rule that are interoperable and enable secure data sharing while preserving user privacy.
Key crypto market outcomes
Despite the challenges, MiCA instils confidence in EU entities due to heightened regulatory oversight, the promotion of investor protection and attracting mainstream institutional participation. Enhanced consumer protection measures mitigate risks such as fraud and hacking, fostering trust among retail clients.
MiCA’s reporting requirements will result in regulators across the EU possessing more data, empowering them to monitor market activities effectively. The ability to freely passport activities across the EU will facilitate cross-border operations and reduce regulatory fragmentation while expanding market reach.
MiCA’s prescriptive nature and all-encompassing regime set a precedent for global regulatory frameworks. Other jurisdictions are already observing and may replicate some of MiCA’s provisions and its approach, contributing to regulatory harmonization on a worldwide scale. However, concerns remain as to whether it will stifle growth and innovation and whether businesses will look to relocate to more permissive and less restrictive jurisdictions.
Steps after MiCA
MiCA’s gaps in regulating emerging areas like true defi (the provision of financial services or issuance of financial assets without identifiable intermediaries and with no single point of failure), lending, and NFTs necessitate ongoing policy discussions and further regulatory measures. Reports on these aspects will inform future regulatory developments, potentially leading to a second iteration of MiCA in at least the next four to five years or supplementary measures.
MiCA signals a new era of regulation in the crypto market, aiming to balance innovation with investor protection and market integrity. While challenges persist, MiCA lays the groundwork for a more transparent, secure, and inclusive crypto framework in the EU and beyond. As the crypto landscape continues to evolve, regulatory regimes must adapt to emerging trends and technologies, ensuring sustainable growth and fostering investor confidence.
Crypto
Debate Brews Over Crypto Kiosks As Lawmakers Consider Potential Ban
Lawmakers Consider Crypto ATM Ban as Scam Losses Rise — Including in Central Minnesota
Minnesota lawmakers are considering banning cryptocurrency kiosks as scam losses continue to rise across the state—including in Central Minnesota.
There are currently about 350 crypto kiosks operating statewide, located in places like gas stations, convenience stores, and grocery stores. These machines allow users to deposit cash and convert it into cryptocurrency, which can then be sent electronically.
Law enforcement officials say scammers are increasingly directing victims to use these kiosks because once the money is sent, it is extremely difficult—if not impossible—to recover.
Police say scams often begin with a phone call, text, or online message. In many cases, scammers pose as government officials, tech support workers, or even romantic partners. Victims are eventually told to withdraw cash and deposit it into a crypto kiosk to “protect” their money or resolve a supposed emergency.
Central Minnesota has seen similar cases. Because St. Cloud serves as a regional hub for shopping and services, crypto kiosks are available locally, giving scammers access points to target area residents.
Some say kiosks also serve legitimate users
Despite the concerns, crypto kiosks do offer legitimate benefits. They allow people to purchase cryptocurrency quickly using cash, without needing a traditional bank account, credit card, or online exchange. Supporters say this can make cryptocurrency more accessible, especially for people who prefer cash transactions or have limited access to banking services.
Crypto kiosks can also be used to send money quickly, including international transfers, without relying on traditional wire services. Some users view them as a convenient way to invest in cryptocurrency or move money electronically without going through a bank.
Companies that operate the machines say the vast majority of transactions are legitimate and that kiosks include warnings about scams. They argue the focus should be on stopping scammers, not banning the machines entirely.
Lawmakers weighing next steps
Supporters of the proposed ban say removing the kiosks could help prevent fraud and protect vulnerable residents, particularly older adults. Law enforcement officials told lawmakers that crypto kiosk scams have resulted in significant financial losses statewide.
Minnesota passed regulations in 2024 requiring some safeguards, including limits on deposits for new users and refund requirements in certain fraud cases. But officials say scammers have continued to adapt.
The bill remains under consideration at the Capitol.
In the meantime, authorities urge Central Minnesota residents to be cautious. Officials emphasize that legitimate government agencies, law enforcement, and businesses will never ask someone to deposit cash into a cryptocurrency kiosk.
As cryptocurrency becomes more common, lawmakers are now weighing whether the risks to consumers outweigh the convenience and accessibility these machines provide.
10 (More) Hilariously Bad Google Reviews of Central MN Landmarks
Crypto
Cryptocurrency Investment Fraud: Bizman loses Rs 2.6 cr to crypto, investment fraud | Hyderabad News – The Times of India
Hyderabad: A 69-year-old businessman from Somajiguda lost 2.65 crore allegedly in a cryptocurrency and stock investment fraud. Based on his complaint, Hyderabad Cyber Crime police have registered a case.The complainant was first contacted by a fraudster posing as Ramya Krishnan on Aug 30, 2025 through Facebook. She persuaded the victim to invest in a cryptocurrency and stock trading platform, Polyus Finance PFP Gold, hosted at the domain pfpgoldfx.vip, promising high returns to finance his proposed resort and apparel ventures.Fraudsters provided the victim a contact number for daily communication and sent screenshots showing notional profits credited in his wallet in USDT cryptocurrency. To build trust, the fraudster even allowed the victim a token withdrawal of 4,300 on Sept 12, 2025.Encouraged, the victim transferred over 2.65 crore in 10 transactions between Sept 10 and Dec 39, 2025 to various current accounts provided by the accused.When he attempted to withdraw his ‘earnings’, the accused demanded an additional 15% conversion commission. After he refused, the website became inaccessible and calls to the fraudsters went unanswered.Realising that he was duped, the victim filed an online report on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (NCRP) before approaching the Cyber Crime police on Feb 25.Based on his complaint, a case was registered under Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act and Sections 111(2)(b) (Organised crime), 318(4) (Cheating), 319(2) (Cheating by personation), 336(3) (Forgery for purpose of cheating), 338 (Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.) and 340(2) (Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on Wednesday. Police were analysing financial transactions to identify and arrest the accused.
Crypto
Terror groups receive $1.7b. from Iran through Binance | The Jerusalem Post
That was a potential violation of global sanctions, the report said, citing company records and documents collected by internal investigators.
The cryptocurrency exchange site reportedly fired or suspended at least four employees cited in the internal investigation. The company blamed “violations of company protocol” relating to its clients’ data, the Times reported.
The report came days after The Jerusalem Post spoke with experts from blockchain intelligence platform NOMINIS.io about how the Iranian regime was evading Western sanctions through cryptocurrencies.
The regime maintains a steady income using cryptocurrency through oil sales to Russia and China, NOMINIS CEO Snir Levi said at the time.
Regarding the latest scandal, he told the Post this week: “The latest allegations about Binance come months after the lawsuit by the victims’ families of October 7 – the ongoing Balva [versus] Binance case.
The majority of the allegations can be easily confirmed by on-chain data. There are thousands of cases where money has been sent and received to and from wallets that have clear connections to Iran.”
Binance founder Changpeng Zhao is being sued by the families of American victims and hostages of the October 7 massacre. He has been accused of knowingly enabling Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to transfer more than $1b. through its platform, including more than $50 million after the October 7 massacre.
Zhao pleaded guilty to anti-money-laundering violations in connection with Binance in 2023. US President Donald Trump pardoned him last October.
“They say what he did was not even a crime,” Trump told reporters last October. “It wasn’t a crime. That he was persecuted by the Biden administration, and so I gave him a pardon at the request of a lot of very good people.”
Binance representative Rachel Conlan said the accounts linked to the $1.7b. in Iranian transactions have been removed and the relevant authorities were informed.
“Any suggestion that Binance knowingly allowed sanctionable activity to continue unchecked is incorrect and defamatory,” she said, despite Zhao’s earlier admission of anti-money-laundering violations.
More than half a dozen compliance officials have left Binance, including a sanctions manager and the leader of the enterprise compliance team, over the past few months, the Times reported.
“No investigator was dismissed for raising compliance concerns or for reporting potential sanctions issues,” Conlan said in a statement to The Guardian.
Democrat senator opens inquiry into cryptocurrency company
While Conlan insisted there was no wrongdoing, US Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) opened an inquiry into Binance on Tuesday, seeking records of the company’s dealings in Hong Kong , where funds have previously been transferred in a network against sanctions.
“Binance appears to have ignored warnings and recommendations to prevent Iranian money-laundering schemes on its cryptocurrency exchange,” Blumenthal wrote in a letter to Binance co-chief executive Richard Teng.
“According to documents obtained by the Times and the Journal, Binance was even warned that Hexa Whale was financing terrorist organizations such as the Yemeni Houthis, and internal investigators found cryptocurrency transfers to wallets associated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and payments to crew members of Russia’s sanctions-evading shadow fleet of oil tankers,” he wrote.
“Instead of actually preventing illicit use, Binance has sought to evade accountability and influence the White House through lobbying and a financial partnership with World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the cryptocurrency firm owned by the sons of President Trump and his special envoy Steve Witkoff… This influence campaign has worked: In May 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it was dismissing a lawsuit against Binance for lying to regulators and mishandling funds, followed in October by the stunning Presidential pardon of founder Changpeng Zhao.”
“The scale of the newly revealed illicit transfers – uncaught until nearly $2 billion flowed to sanctioned entities – and the unexplained firing of internal investigators call into question Binance’s compliance with American sanctions and banking laws, and its 2023 agreement to resolve the previous federal investigation,” Blumenthal wrote.
-
World2 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts2 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Oklahoma1 week agoWildfires rage in Oklahoma as thousands urged to evacuate a small city
-
Louisiana5 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Denver, CO2 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Technology6 days agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Technology6 days agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making