Connect with us

Crypto

A compelling case for regulating cryptocurrency

Published

on

A compelling case for regulating cryptocurrency

Cryptocurrency is accessible anywhere. It feels smart and sophisticated. It is built to be technologically secure. It can be an asset as well as, in some parts of the world, a means of payment. It can be converted into fiat (cash) at a moment’s notice. And, unlike conventional financial instruments, it offers no barriers to adoption. With as little as a hundred rupees, an aspiring youngster in the hinterlands of India can buy a fraction of cryptocurrency and feel like a grand investor.

Mitali Mukherjee’s book Crypto Crimes deals with this alluring asset class that has the potential to exist beyond the reaches of governments and conventional financial institutions or at least dodge easy scrutiny by governments. This is why crypto is so popular among scamsters, kidnappers, extortionists, drug peddlers, hawala operators, terrorism financiers, and ransomware invaders. Mukherjee successfully depicts this web of nefarious activities. She describes the world of crypto as one without guardrails, lethal to many, and potentially dangerous to all. Like a good journalist, she does this by expertly piling fact-filled passages upon each other.

Crypto Crimes: Inside India’s Best-Kept Secret 

By Mitali Mukherjee

HarperCollins India
Pages: ‎336
Price: Rs.499

Two chapters dedicated to the threat posed by ransomware attacks offer us details about how a cross section of Indian organisations—both public and private—were affected. The list includes JNPT, SpiceJet, Oil India Limited, Dr Reddy’s, BSNL, Mobikwik, Paytm Mall, BigBasket, and AIIMS. In this model, the invaders have the option to not only extract ransom but also earn through the sale of sensitive personal information of the customers of these companies. The author highlights the inadequacies of security frameworks in many Indian corporates and also how some companies under attack resort to denials or react irrationally against whistle-blowers or those offering a helping hand. 

Even more revealing is the existence of “Ransomware-as-a-Service” groups that lease technologies to other groups that actually carry out the attack. But what is crypto’s role in ransomware? Well, it brings scalability to this grimly innovative industry by offering convenience and anonymity and, therefore, the promise of an untraceable escape.

Advertisement

Need for regulations

The book helps one understand the dire need for standardised regulations, protocols, and practices for this porous currency, which has as much disregard for national borders as greenhouse gases. However, with world leaders unable to build a consensus to combat greater existential threats such as climate change and AI, the only hope is that the global crypto market offers sufficient financial incentive for such a consensus to be reached.

As things stand, three different entities of the Indian government itself—the RBI, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, and the Ministry of Finance—are unable to agree upon the approach to cryptocurrency. Whereas the RBI has been sounding the warning bugle since 2013, the ministry has been inconsistent in its response. It has pondered over banning cryptocurrency altogether, created committees at various points that made different recommendations, and mulled over the introduction of its own virtual currency (Central Bank Digital Currency) and, after all these years, still has not formulated regulations for the domain. However, in 2022, it did announce heavy taxation of gains made in cryptocurrency, which affected the industry. Without a trace of irony, the Finance Minister denied that this move offered legitimacy to crypto and instead claimed “a sovereign right to tax”.

The book captures a sole, sane voice from within the corridors of power: former Finance Secretary Subhash Chandra Garg, who recommends that policy-making precede legislation, which can then lead to well-framed and implementable regulations.

Highlights
  • Eshwar Sundaresan reviews Crypto Crimes: Inside India’s Best-Kept Secret by Mitali Mukherjee.
  • The book makes a compelling case for regulating cryptocurrency that may be longer-lasting than its detractors believe
  • Two chapters on ransomware attacks offer us details about how a cross section of Indian organisations were affected by these.
  • However the book suffers from poor storytelling and repetitiveness.

Tedious and repetitive

Now for the flaws of the book. The author often overloads the reader with information while resorting to poor storytelling, except in the last few chapters, which are more free-flowing. In some chapters, the same point is repeated in a loop, with a new source offering a similar or slightly differing perspective of the same point. In the process, the drama, emotions, and imagery surrounding poignant human moments are left untapped. Can a serious book not also be evocative?

Had the organisation of information been better, this would have been a much smaller book. It does not help that key points are repeated ad nauseum. These include the specific vulnerabilities of India to crypto crimes, the speed with which the technology penetrated rural and semi-rural landscapes in the country, market fluctuations vis-a-vis the pandemic, and the involvement of Russian and Chinese entities in ransomware attacks and extortions respectively. Sometimes, the same study is cited twice in a span of a few pages, such as the mention of Maharashtra being the target of 42 per cent of ransomware attacks in India. One wonders whether each chapter was written like an isolated article and, therefore, the author felt compelled to set contexts and data points all over again.

For a book that relies extensively on surveys and statistics, it seems astonishing that the author has made no attempt to leverage infographics. These could have made the points more memorable, while offering the beginnings of analysis. Forget a grand diorama of stakeholders, issues, and interactions, the book does not include even a timeline of events or a simple table or graph that would help one absorb comparative data.

Advertisement

Also Read | ‘Only the tip of the iceberg’: Dr Jayant Mahadevan on online gambling in India

Although the book has the viscous storytelling of a scholarly study, it lacks the rigour to make it one. A great deal of the book relies on secondary research; while citing these external sources of information, the author hardly ever offers more than rudimentary analysis of her own. And the primary research itself is unsatisfactory. The author has interviewed technocrats, the odd retail investor, some insiders, and a few crypto entrepreneurs. She walks on eggshells with the latter category, making no attempt to provoke or even challenge their self-serving opinions. For instance, when BuyUCoin co-founder Shivam Thakral laments the lack of financial literacy among Indians, the author does not ask whether this puts a greater onus on the government to protect such a target audience from harm. Perhaps just making an observation in this regard would have sufficed. Similarly, while interviewing Nischal Shetty, the co-founder of WazirX—a company that was slapped with a show-cause notice for allegedly contravening regulations of the Foreign Exchange Management Act to the tune of Rs.2,790.74 crore—who refuses to look within and states that people will always choose freedom (as opposed to regulations), she does not ask if all people, including the honest retail investor, would object to regulations that protect them. Finally, in a book based on hard research, the citations provided are not substantiated either in the back pages of the book or in the publisher’s website URL linked to a QR code that promises “Detailed Notes” on both the front and back sides of the book.

Overall, Mukherjee makes a compelling case for regulating this new asset class that may be longer-lasting than its detractors believe while also highlighting its potential for positive transformation. This makes the book a ready reckoner for those who want to delve into and dwell on the world of crypto. Others are likely to find it tedious and mediocre.

Eshwar Sundaresan is an author, freelance journalist, counsellor, life skills trainer, and bestselling ghostwriter.

More stories from this issue

Advertisement

Crypto

Top 100 Bitcoin Treasuries Now Hold 1.26M BTC

Published

on

Top 100 Bitcoin Treasuries Now Hold 1.26M BTC

Key Takeaways

Bitcoin Treasuries Are Turning Scarcity Into Strategy

Institutional bitcoin accumulation has grown dramatically, with the top 100 holders now controlling 1,258,090 BTC as of June 8, 2026, according to a chart published on X by HODL15Capital. This group includes public companies, private firms, mining operators, and treasury-focused entities, reflecting specialized corporate allocations alongside one dominant buyer.

At the top of the list, Strategy holds exactly 845,256 BTC, far surpassing every other entity. Twentyone Capital follows with 43,514 BTC, and Japan’s Metaplanet holds 40,177 BTC, showing that institutional BTC accumulation is global and spans multiple industries. Marathon Digital contributes 35,303 BTC.

Top 100 bitcoin treasury companies. Source: HODL15Capital

The size of Strategy’s lead reveals how uneven the race has become. One company controls more bitcoin than the rest of the top 100 combined, turning corporate treasury policy into a marketwide talking point. For investors, that concentration makes Strategy one of the clearest equity-market proxies for BTC exposure.

Other major names on the chart include Coinbase, Riot Platforms, Tesla, Spacex, Cleanspark, Block, Galaxy Digital, American Bitcoin Corp., and Hut 8. That lineup makes the trend easy to understand: bitcoin is no longer only a crypto-sector balance sheet bet. It now reaches miners, exchanges, technology firms, private companies, and treasury vehicles.

The BTC Concentration Across Sectors and Borders

The global spread of BTC holders is as notable as the headline total. Metaplanet’s top ranking shows adoption is no longer U.S.-centric, with participants from Japan, Canada, Europe, and Asia signaling worldwide corporate and institutional demand for bitcoin.

The supply angle is what makes the chart matter beyond crypto circles. The top 100 holders control more than 6% of bitcoin’s maximum 21 million supply, giving a singular corporate buyer a highly visible role in market liquidity. For shareholders, that creates both upside potential and sharper exposure to crypto-driven swings.

Advertisement

Overall, the chart illustrates a highly centralized institutional concentration of bitcoin reserves. The focus is no longer just who holds the most, but how BTC has become a balance sheet battleground, with companies using treasury positions to signal conviction, attract investors, and position themselves in a more bitcoin-integrated financial landscape.

Continue Reading

Crypto

About 1 in 5 Americans have used crypto; Republicans’ use has ticked up

Published

on

About 1 in 5 Americans have used crypto; Republicans’ use has ticked up

Even after years of buzz, the use of cryptocurrency has remained fairly stable in the United States. Today, about one-in-five U.S. adults (19%) say they’ve invested in or used a cryptocurrency – about on par with the 16% who said this in 2021.

But for the first time, there is a partisan gap in use. Republicans’ crypto use has ticked up from 16% in 2021 to 22% today, and they are now more likely than Democrats to say they’ve used it, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted in January 2026.

Crypto has become part of the national political conversation in recent years. The Trump administration has set out to make America the “crypto capital of the world,” including steps to allow crypto firms to become banks.

About this research

This Pew Research Center analysis looks at Americans’ personal experiences with cryptocurrency over time.

Why did we do this?

Pew Research Center does research to inform the public, journalists and decision-makers. Studying the public’s views and experiences with cryptocurrency is part of our long-standing research on technology, e-commerce, online privacy and security, and related topics.

Advertisement

Learn more about Pew Research Center.

How did we do this?

For the 2026 data, we surveyed 8,512 U.S. adults from Jan. 20 to 26, 2026. Everyone who took part in this survey is a member of the Center’s American Trends Panel. The survey represents the views of the full U.S. adult population.

Here are the questions used for this analysis, the topline and the survey methodology.

Who uses cryptocurrency?

Some of the biggest demographic differences in cryptocurrency use are by gender, age and income.


Men under 50 stand out for being crypto users; Republicans are more likely to use it than Democrats

Advertisement

% of U.S. adults who say they have ever invested in, traded or used a cryptocurrency such as bitcoin or ether

* Estimates for Asian adults are representative of English speakers only.
Note: White, Black and Asian adults include those who report being only one race and are not Hispanic. Hispanics are of any race. Family income tiers are based on adjusted 2024 earnings.

Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted Jan. 20-26, 2026.

PEW RESEARCH CENTER


Advertisement


Men under 50 stand out for being crypto users; Republicans are more likely to use it than Democrats

% of U.S. adults who say they have ever invested in, traded or used a cryptocurrency such as bitcoin or ether

Demographic %
U.S. adults U.S. Adults 19
Men Gender 27
Women Gender 11
Ages 18-29 Age 26
30-49 Age 28
50+ Age 10
Men 18-29 Male and Age 38
30-49 Male and Age 40
50+ Male and Age 14
Women 18-29 Female and Age 15
30-49 Female and Age 17
50+ Female and Age 6
White Race/Ethnicity 18
Hispanic Race/Ethnicity 19
Black Race/Ethnicity 20
Asian* Race/Ethnicity 25
Upper income Income 27
Middle income Income 20
Lower income Income 16
Rep/Lean Rep Party 22
Dem/Lean Dem Party 17

* Estimates for Asian adults are representative of English speakers only.
Note: White, Black and Asian adults include those who report being only one race and are not Hispanic. Hispanics are of any race. Family income tiers are based on adjusted 2024 earnings.

Source: Survey of U.S. adults conducted Jan. 20-26, 2026.

Advertisement

PEW RESEARCH CENTER


By gender and age

As was true in past surveys, young men stand out for their use of crypto:

  • 38% of men ages 18 to 29 say they have ever invested in, traded or used cryptocurrency, compared with 15% of women in the same age range.
  • 40% of men ages 30 to 49 have done this, compared with 17% of women in this age group.

Crypto use among men and women ages 30 to 49 has gone up since 2021. And men 50 and older are also more likely to have ever used crypto today than in 2021.

By income

About one-in-four adults in upper-income households (27%) have invested in or used crypto, up from 23% in 2024 and 17% in 2021.

Advertisement

By comparison, 20% of middle-income Americans have used crypto, up slightly from 17% in 2021. Use has not changed among lower-income Americans (16% this year vs. 15% in 2021).

By party

Republicans are now more likely than Democrats to have invested in, traded or used crypto (22% vs. 17%). Before this year, Republicans and Republican-leaning independents were as likely as Democrats and Democratic leaners to say they’d done so. But GOP crypto use has grown from 16% in 2021 to 22% now, while Democrats’ use has held steady at 17%.

By race and ethnicity

A quarter of Asian adults say they have ever invested in, traded or used crypto – which is similar to Black and Hispanic adults. White adults remain less likely to be crypto users than Asian adults but are on par with Black and Hispanic adults for the first time. This is partially due to crypto use among White Americans ticking up from 13% in 2021 to 18% today.

For more about Americans and cryptocurrency, read our 2024 analysis, which has information on:

Note: Here are the questions used for this analysis, the topline and the survey methodology.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto

Bitcoin Surges 5% to $64K, Settles Near $62.5K as Trump Says Netanyahu Must Accept Iran Deal

Published

on

Bitcoin Surges 5% to K, Settles Near .5K as Trump Says Netanyahu Must Accept Iran Deal

Key Takeaways

Trump Says the Deal Is ‘Almost Complete’

The rally followed remarks in which Trump framed the agreement as a near-certainty and signaled he would push it through with or without Israel’s full cooperation. Speaking about Netanyahu, the president said the Israeli leader will have “no choice” but to sign because, in his telling, he “calls the shots.”

Image source: X

Trump described the deal as “almost complete” and said he expected an announcement at the start of the new business week, with traders treating the language as a firmer commitment than the ceasefire speculation that has come and gone for months, and risk assets reacted within hours.

Analysts first flagged the price reaction, noting bitcoin’s 5% jump to $64,000 came directly on the back of the comments, indicating that the market read the statement less as a rumor and more as a direct signal that Washington intends to close the matter regardless of how Jerusalem responds.

A Bounce off the 2026 Low

The surge marked a sharp turn from the prior week as Bitcoin touched an intraday low near $59,100 on June 5, its weakest level since February (during what Bitcoin.com News described as the worst week of 2026 for the asset). At the lows, more than half of all BTC sat in unrealized loss, a condition that has historically lined up with major market bottoms.

Advertisement

Short-term chart readings had already pointed to an oversold market primed for a snapback, leaving the rally needing only a catalyst. The geopolitical headline supplied it. Even after the move, bitcoin remained roughly $18,000 below the $82,000 record it set in mid-May, underscoring how much ground the recent decline erased.

The recovery offered relief to leveraged traders after a brutal stretch of forced selling earlier in the month. Hundreds of thousands of positions were wiped out as the price slid, and a swift reversal of that kind often triggers a wave of short liquidations that amplifies the upside.

Geopolitics Back in the Driver’s Seat

Bitcoin’s sensitivity to Middle East headlines has been one of 2026’s defining patterns given that earlier in the year, the digital currency’s topped $77,000 as Trump weighed his options on Iran, while prediction-market wagers on a peace deal swelled into the hundreds of millions of dollars. De-escalation signals have repeatedly lifted risk appetite, and threats of conflict have pulled it back down.

Crypto tends to trade as a high-beta risk asset in these episodes, selling off harder than equities when fear spikes and rallying faster when it eases. That makes bitcoin an unusually sensitive barometer of how traders price the odds of war or peace, even when the headlines have no direct link to digital assets.

The same tensions had been a drag in recent weeks as higher oil prices tied to the standoff have fed inflation concerns and complicated the Federal Reserve’s rate path, with some officials declining to rule out further hikes and expected cuts being pushed back. That backdrop helped drag crypto lower before Sunday’s rebound.

Advertisement

Analysts caution that headline-driven rallies can fade quickly and only a confirmed agreement could sustain the move. Collapse in talks or a fresh exchange of fire risks sending the price back toward its recent floor. The Fed’s stance remains a second swing factor that could cap any extended recovery.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending