Illinois
Two months after Illinois launched food program, farmers still waiting to get paid
A long-delayed state program to get fresh food from local farms to vulnerable communities in Illinois was finally launched in March. But two months later, participants are still struggling to get money from the state to pay farmers and cover program expenses.
“We started with intentions of having money earlier than this and (the farmers) trusted us,” said Brenda Stewart, who runs Run-A-Way Buckers, a community organization distributing produce in eastern Illinois’ Pembroke Township. “I’m thankful they didn’t hold it against us.”
The $30 million federally funded effort aims to rebuild the state’s local food system by connecting underrepresented farmers with communities in need. Even though farms make up 75% of Illinois’ land area, only 5% of the food grown in Illinois is purchased in-state.
When Gov. J.B. Pritzker first announced the nonprofits selected to distribute food in early March, many — including Run-A-Way Buckers — jumped at the opportunity to get started. The announcement was overdue so Black, first-generation and veteran farmers had already ramped up production in anticipation, food was spoiling and families were waiting.
Diane McDonald organizes a network of fellow small-scale Black farmers that has been giving over 100 pounds of produce to Run-A-Way Buckers per week for the last two months. They haven’t been paid for any of it yet, but she isn’t giving up on the program.
“It’s been a crunch. It’s been a lot of out-of-pocket money,” said McDonald. “But, we’re determined to continue until (the state) get(s) it together. It’s a worthy cause, and I appreciate the fact that small farmers are being acknowledged because we’re very important to the agricultural system.”
While farmers have been on the hook, the Illinois Equitable Access Towards Sustainable Systems (IL-EATS) program has been “the talk of the town” among recipients, Stewart said.
The Swiss chard and goat cheese have been big hits at the local senior center, where Run-A-Way Buckers has been sending two dozen bags of locally-grown food each week. The seniors have enjoyed exchanging recipes for these healthy goods that are now available to them.
“It’s bringing out togetherness and a sense of adventure in them, and I love that,” said Velsie Kim Bridges, who runs the center’s nutrition program.
Good intentions, flawed execution
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is funding similar programs that connect underrepresented farmers and underserved communities in every state except Wyoming.
Most have had their programs up and running for a while. Wisconsin, for example, announced a funding agreement with the federal government in August 2022 and delivered $1.4 million worth of food by the end of last year.
Illinois reached a funding agreement only two months later, but it didn’t finalize contracts with food distributors until this spring.
Illinois farmers anxious after ramping up production for food program that was delayed
Wisconsin and other states chose to work with established food banks. “Illinois opted for a more inclusive model,” according to a statement from the Illinois Department of Human Services, which is managing the program with the state’s Department of Agriculture.
The state put out an open call for farmers and food distributors to apply for a portion of the grant money to ensure smaller organizations with strong ties to local communities could participate.
McDonald appreciated the opportunity to feed her neighbors who have been generally unable to access or afford her fresh produce. Much of what she grows is shipped to farmers markets an hour and a half away in Chicago.
“We did give food to the pantry on a volunteer basis, but this was on a larger scale. We could reach more people in the community,” said McDonald, who also runs a program that teaches local youth how to farm.
The human services department acknowledged that Illinois’ more grassroots approach, which helped farmers like McDonald get involved, made it more difficult to launch its program.
“Taking a different approach than other states … to advance equity and ensure new providers have the same opportunities was the right choice for Illinois,” the human services department said in a statement. “Doing what is right is not always the easiest route in the short term, but we will continue to learn and adjust as we strive to ensure this new program is successful.”
Some funds flowing

In early May, the human services department announced it finally had the federal funds to reimburse food costs.
This came as a relief to Marty Travis, whose nonprofit Down at the Farms, 100 miles south of Chicago in Fairbury, was selected to coordinate food distribution. He took nearly $120,000 out of Down at the Farms — tapping into grant money and forgoing necessary infrastructure upgrades — to pay farmers.
“We’ve exhausted all of that money that we felt like we could set aside without putting ourselves in total jeopardy,” Travis said.
Meanwhile, Stewart’s Run-A-Way Buckers waited for funds to flow before paying farmers. Consequently, McDonald has struggled to pay the farmhands helping her harvest, package and transport the over 100 pounds of produce she’s giving Run-A-Way Buckers each week.
“They’ve been hanging in there with me,” McDonald said. “The out-of-pocket money is all I have to give them to keep them coming and helping.”
The human services department told nonprofits they could expect to receive two months of advance payment and monthly reimbursements, but their contract stipulates they must be able to front at least 60 days worth of program expenses.
Just as the program reached that two-month mark, Travis and Stewart received their first checks for food costs. But, the wait isn’t over. Illinois has yet to secure federal funds for labor and transportation costs, which account for 30% to 45% of participating nonprofits’ program expenses. One employee at Run-A-Way Buckers is still owed about $16,000 for the time he has spent managing distribution.
More representation

In April, the farmers and nonprofits waiting for reimbursement discovered the state quietly slashed the prices the program would pay for food.
Chicken breast that was originally valued at $15.75 per pound was suddenly $8.25 per pound.
The program had originally garnered lots of excitement for essentially paying retail prices for wholesale products.
“I was gonna say it’s irresponsible, but it’s just not fair,” said Travis, a seventh-generation farmer.
The prices are subject to be updated twice per year, and the April changes reflected price fluctuations and the addition of new food items not included on the original list, according to a statement from the human services department.
“That’s like everybody else coming out here, making all these promises about how they’re going to help this community, and then they never follow through. We’ve had a lot of that happen, so it’s not building up good trust among us,” said McDonald, recalling her experience with the government as a rural Black farmer.
With new farm bill in the works, Illinois farmers go to Washington to urge investments in environmental justice
After listening to feedback from farmers and food distributors, the state agreed to revert to the originally advertised prices.
In light of this, farmers are demanding more transparency and representation in the program, which is scheduled to run through September 2025.

“We’re out here daily, dealing with the elements to make the produce the best that we can give, so I think that we should have some kind of say in the policymaking,” McDonald said.
The program has had growing pains but, across the state, there remains a steadfast commitment to strengthening local food systems and hope that this initiative will do just that.
“It will sort itself out. But we’ve lost trust, we’ve lost time and we’ve lost the ability to keep all of our farmers engaged in this. We can’t break the back of all the farmers,” Travis said. “We just need to follow through. We need to close the loop.”
Illinois
SCOTUS blocks deployment of National Guards to Illinois
-
Investigation reveals timeline in Melodee Buzzard’s death
01:14
-
At least two killed in Pa. nursing home explosion
01:26
-
Now Playing
SCOTUS blocks deployment of National Guards to Illinois
01:16
-
UP NEXT
DOJ releases Epstein files that mention Trump
01:36
-
Skater Tony Hawk makes ‘Nutcracker’ ballet debut
00:18
-
Russell Brand charged with rape and sexual assault
00:32
-
Mother of missing girl found dead taken into custody
00:10
-
Melodee Buzzard’s body has been found
00:32
-
Jim Beam to halt whiskey production for one year
00:21
-
Third batch of Epstein files mentions Trump
00:28
-
Chipotle to offer GLP-1 menu options for customers
00:26
-
How to protect yourself from the flu as cases surge
00:37
-
Maduro seen dancing with humanoid AI-robot
00:20
-
Jackie Chan carries the Olympic Torch through Pompeii
00:19
-
Rescuers search Mexican Navy plane after crash in Texas
00:31
-
Greta Thunberg arrested for supporting hunger strikers
00:36
-
Eruption at Yellowstone geyser caught on camera
00:18
-
Ohio kids lead police on a high speed stolen car chase
01:21
-
U.S. launches new deadly strike on alleged narco-boat
00:18
-
Trap captures wrong bear in California
00:17
-
Investigation reveals timeline in Melodee Buzzard’s death
01:14
-
At least two killed in Pa. nursing home explosion
01:26
-
Now Playing
SCOTUS blocks deployment of National Guards to Illinois
01:16
-
UP NEXT
DOJ releases Epstein files that mention Trump
01:36
-
Skater Tony Hawk makes ‘Nutcracker’ ballet debut
00:18
-
Russell Brand charged with rape and sexual assault
00:32
Illinois
Supreme Court rejects Trump’s bid to deploy National Guard in Illinois
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday rebuffed the Trump administration over its plan to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois over the strenuous objections of local officials.
The court in an unsigned order turned away an emergency request made by the administration, which said the troops are needed to protect federal agents involved in immigration enforcement in the Chicago area.
Although the decision is a preliminary one involving only Chicago, it will likely bolster similar challenges made to National Guard deployments in other cities, with the opinion setting significant new limits on the president’s ability to do so.
The decision marked a rare defeat for President Donald Trump at the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, after the administration secured a series of high-profile wins this year.
In doing so, the court at least provisionally rejected the Trump administration’s view that the situation on the ground is so chaotic that it justifies invoking a federal law that allows the president to call National Guard troops into federal service in extreme situations.
Those circumstances can include when “there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion” or “the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”
The court ruled against the administration on a threshold question, finding that the law’s reference to the “regular forces” only allows for the National Guard to be called up if regular military forces are unable to restore order.
The court order said that Trump could only call up the military where they could “legally execute the laws” and that power is limited under another law called the Posse Comitatus Act.
“At this preliminary stage, the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois,” the court said.
As a result, the Trump administration has failed to show that the National Guard law “permits the President to federalize the Guard in the exercise of inherent authority to protect federal personnel and property in Illinois,” the court added.
The decision saw the court’s six conservative justices split, with three in the majority and three in dissent. The court’s three liberals were in the majority.
The dissenters were Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.
“I have serious doubts about the correctness of the court’s views. And I strongly disagree with the manner in which the court has disposed of this application,” Alito wrote in a dissenting opinion.
“There is no basis for rejecting the President’s determination that he was unable to execute the federal immigration laws using the civilian law enforcement resources at his command,” he added.
Trump’s unusual move to deploy the National Guard, characteristic of his aggressive and unprecedented use of executive power, was based on his administration’s stated assessment that the Chicago area was descending into lawless chaos.
That view of protests against surging immigration enforcement actions in Chicago is rejected by local officials as well as judges who have ruled against the administration.
The deployment was challenged in court by the Democratic-led state of Illinois and the city of Chicago, with their lawyers saying Trump had an ulterior motive for the deployment: to punish his political opponents.
They argued in court papers that Trump’s invocation of the federal law was not justified and that his actions also violated the Constitution’s 10th Amendment, which places limits on federal power, as well as the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally bars the military from conducting law enforcement duties.
U.S. District Judge April Perry said she “found no credible evidence that there is a danger of rebellion” and issued a temporary restraining order in favor of the state.
The Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals largely reached the same conclusion, saying “the facts do not justify the president’s actions.”
The court did narrow Perry’s order, saying that Trump could federalize the troops, but could not deploy them.
The Supreme Court has frequently ruled in Trump’s favor in recent months as the administration has rushed to the justices when policies are blocked by lower courts.
Trump’s efforts to impose federal control over cities led by Democrats who vociferously oppose his presidency are not just limited to Chicago. He has also sought to deploy the National Guard in the District of Columbia, Los Angeles and Portland, Oregon.
Most recently, hundreds of National Guard troops deployed in Illinois and Oregon were set to return to their home states.
The deployment in the District of Columbia, which is a federal enclave with less local control, has been challenged in court, but there has been no ruling yet.
A federal appeals court allowed the Los Angeles deployment, and a different panel of judges on Oct. 20 ruled similarly in relation to Portland.
Illinois
Gates Explains How Injuries are Holding Mizzou Back After Loss to Illinois
ST. LOUIS — Dennis Gates’ eyebrows raised when he heard the word choice of “struggles” in a question regarding a recent drop off in perimeter offense for Missouri that was evident in a loss to Illinois.
“You said ‘struggles’?” Gates asked.
“You know, I can’t wait to get healthy as a team,” Gates said to answer the question.
With three of its players injured, Missouri suffered a 91-48 loss to No. 20 Illinois on Monday. It’s the lowest-scoring performance in any game in the Gates era. It’s the lowest-scoring output for Missouri in the series since a matchup in the 1943-44 season.
There’s no way to sugarcoat how poor of a performance it was for the Tigers. The cracks in the foundation that have been popping since the season opener at Howard are continuing to break through even more.
But Gates believes returning those thee players will begin to patch up those cracks and get Missouri closer to its full potential.
“It’s like pieces of puzzles,” Gates said. “Our entire team has been put together a certain way. … So we have guys playing playing well, but playing out of position due to our injuries, and ultimately, I’m excited about getting healthy. You cannot ask our players to do more than what they’ve done. I take it on my shoulders, as the leader, as the head coach, it’s on me. This game is on me.”
The most impactful of the absences has been guard Jayden Stone, who has now missed each of the last seven games with a hand injury. He provided a scoring spark off the bench, including from the perimeter, when he was healthy. His initial timeline for return set him to return to the court for SEC play at the latest.
Meanwhile, forward Trent Pierce has missed the entirety of his junior season so far with an undisclosed injury. No specific timeline has been given for his return.
Additionally, Missouri faced another surprising hit against the Fighting Illini with forward Jevon Porter missing the game with a leg injury.
Between Stone and Porter, Missouri is missing a combined average of 19.2 points and 8.5 rebounds per game. Plus the length of Pierce, who started in 19 games last season.
Gates believes Missouri is hurting not only from the absence of those three players alone, but also from the domino effect it is having on the lineups. Specifically with the offensive spacing that Stone brings that creates opportunities for other players on the offense.
“When you lose a guy (Pierce) that has not played this season and he’s a starter in the SEC, that’s a (missing) advantage with length, shooting ability,” Gates said. “Jayden Stone, the same way, look at his percentage. You have to have both Stone and (Jacob) Crews in the game to open up things.”
The injuries have forced other players into roles not originally expected, stretching the roster thin.
“But in the meantime, in the process of getting healthy, we got to have guys fill in the blanks and be utility guys and do something that we may not have planned for you to do,” Gates said. “Some may take the opportunity as a way to get on the court, some may not.”
Gates specifically highlighted wanting the guys who were being asked to do more to do a better job of defending the 3-point line, where Illinois shot 45% from. He also highlighted wanting center Luke Northweather to be more agressive offensively in Porter’s absence.
Monday night’s absence for Porter meant more opportunities for true freshman forward Nicholas Randall, who appeared in 13 minutes. He grabbed two rebounds in that time.
But Porter and Pierce’s absence was still painfully obvious on the glass. Missouri was out-rebounded 43-24 and gave up 29 second-chance points while only scoring five of their own, a key disparity in the loss. The dominance on the glass for Illinois was crucial to the Fighting Illini going on a 14-5 run to end the first half. Gates attributed the second-chance points to Illinois being able to execute consistently on the opportunities and Missouri getting out of rotation too often.
“The second-chance points that we gave up, they executed on every single one of them, and that’s what hurt us,” Gates said. “That’s what ignited their run. And I just thought our guys at that point, hit a wall.”
Gates isn’t letting the injuries, nor Monday’s blowout loss affect his perception of what the team is capable of. With optimism that at least Stone and Porter could return at the start of SEC play, he’s hoping his team will look closer to the original picture he had in mind.
“I think our team is a good team, man,” Gates said. “We can win games as we have, without certain guys, and we’ll continue to piece it together.”
That piecing together will need to come quick. In non-conference play, Missouri did not earn any sort of notch for a possible bid in the NCAA Tournament. Though the Tigers finish the slate 10-3, Missouri went 1-3 against high-major opponents in that. The loss to Illinois was one that draws even more questions on what the Tigers are truly capable of this season.
Read more Missouri Tigers news:
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Maine1 week agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland1 week agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
New Mexico1 week agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
South Dakota1 week agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMIT professor Nuno F.G. Loureiro, a 47-year-old physicist and fusion scientist, shot and killed in his home in Brookline, Mass. | Fortune