Connect with us

Illinois

Paul Vallas: Illinois commission’s new recommendations on university funding don’t address racial inequities

Published

on

Paul Vallas: Illinois commission’s new recommendations on university funding don’t address racial inequities


The Illinois Commission on Equitable Public University Funding’s recommendation to allocate additional funding to universities based on race is not only misguided but also ignores the primary cause of inequities in higher education: the lack of school choice at the K-12 level. 

This is not surprising, given that the commission was established under Public Act 102-0570 in 2021, with the premise that Illinois higher education is systemically racist and that more funding is the solution.

The commission’s primary goal was always to secure more funding, and it acknowledges that it is building upon the passage of the evidence-based formula in 2017, which changed how K-12 education in Illinois is funded. This formula pushed billions in new funds to local schools based on the notion that schools are underfunded, and that if they were adequately funded, academic success would follow.

The commission’s funding model, like the EBF model, includes a provision that base funding never drops at any university. This provision reduces the pressure to consolidate campuses. The bureaucrats sell this increased funding by wrapping it in equity arguments, asserting that universities cannot address equity issues because they are underfunded.

Advertisement

The State Higher Education Executive Officers Association in a 2022 report ranked Illinois No. 1 for state support for higher education. The report said the state allocated nearly $23,000 in funding per student to its universities for 2022. This is an increase of almost 55% from the 2012 level of $14,975. At No. 2 was Alaska at $18,436. The Illinois commission is asking taxpayers to provide another $1.4 billion in new funding to meet the goals stated in the report.

Page 25 of the commission’s report shows the numbers for one of the equity adjustments in the new funding formula, which incentivizes universities to admit minorities for greater funding. This formula values a Black student at $6,000, a Latino student at $4,000 and a rural student at $2,000.

The evidence presented for systemic racism is based on enrollment numbers and graduation rates by demographic. However, there is no attempt to examine the K-12 preparatory experience of students who graduated or failed to graduate. The commission is silent on the poor performance of public school children statewide.

School choice is welcomed at the higher education level for federal and state student financial aid — more than 54% of students enrolled in private colleges and universities have federal student loan debt. However, school choice is denied at the K-12 level. The Chicago Teachers Union advocates for getting rid of Chicago Public Schools’ charter and magnet schools as well.

National data speaks to the superior performance of minority students who attend charter or private schools. Stanford University’s Center for Research on Education Outcomes tracked public charter outcomes of millions of students, finding that charter schools produce superior student gains; these schools outperform peers in math and reading despite enrolling a more challenging student population.

Advertisement

Private schools have enjoyed extraordinary success. Catholic school students saw the nation’s highest scores on all four National Assessment of Educational Progress exams. When disaggregated by race, Catholic schools have shown significant gains since 2019, leading the nation for Latino achievement on each of the four tests and Black student achievement on three of the tests.

Chicago Archdiocese Catholic schools showed similar results, with students defying the national trend of pandemic-related stagnation and decline in academics. Illinois Policy Institute analysis of Illinois State Board of Education data shows that low-income students in Illinois who received scholarships from the Invest in Kids scholarship program were proficient in reading and math at a higher rate in nearly every grade compared to low-income, public school students in Illinois.

The success of school choice is a story of unique, individualized learning experiences, not one of family wealth or selection bias. The commission’s accusation of systemic racism in the higher education system while ignoring the role of the systematic efforts to deny quality K-12 school choices to poor families, overwhelmingly Black and Latino, is scholarly malpractice.

It’s clear that too few students, disproportionately Black and Latino, are getting the preparation they need to complete a university degree. It’s not the colleges’ fault; it’s the responsibility of our public elementary and secondary schools. The denial of quality education choices at the K-12 level undermines college preparedness.

Throwing more money at the most heavily subsidized university systems in the country and the best-funded K-12 public schools of almost any state in the nation, absent the commitment to improve the situation, will do little to improve equity.

Advertisement

Paul Vallas is an adviser for the Illinois Policy Institute. He has run for Chicago mayor twice and was previously budget director for the city and CEO of Chicago Public Schools.

Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@chicagotribune.com.



Source link

Illinois

Record-high Illinois university workers opt-out of pensions

Published

on

Record-high Illinois university workers opt-out of pensions



A record share of Illinois university employees opt-out of pensions for a 401(k)-style plan, lawmakers should give other state employees the same flexibility.

More retired state university employees are opting for a 401(k)-style plan rather than a traditional pension than ever before. They want more choice and flexibility in their retirement benefits. Lawmakers should expand the option to all state workers.

SURS published its annual actuarial evaluation for 2025. With only 47.1% of what they need to pay retirees, they are the second-highest funded state pension in Illinois, beaten only by the Teachers Retirement System with a funded ratio of 47.8%. That shouldn’t be a source of pride, however.

Experts say 60% funded is dangerous and 40% funded or lower is past the point of no return, so 47% is far too low. Illinois’ pension crisis is the worst in the nation.

Advertisement

But the system stands apart because it offers a way out for employees who don’t want to be stuck in the outdated, one-size-fits-all pension model or a pension system that might become insolvent.

SURS gained 1,314 new employees last year, 725 to the traditional and portable pension plans while 589 opted into the Retirement Savings Plan. Nearly half, 45%, of all new members joining are opting out of a traditional pension.

The numbers show 18.2% of all active employees opted into the Retirement Savings Plan, the highest ever since it started in 1998.

It’s a defined contribution plan, similar to a 401(k), rather than the typical defined benefit pension available in most state retirement systems. That’s up from 17.7% of active employees in 2024.

Actuaries expect this pattern to continue, projecting a growing share of active employees opting into the plan until it reaches around 30% of all active employees who are on a defined contribution plan.

Advertisement

Academic hires such as professors are expected to opt-in to the Retirement Savings Plan at a rate of 45%. Non-academic employees such as administrators are expected to opt-in at a rate closer to 25%.

In both cases, employees seem to enjoy getting more choice over how to invest their retirement benefits, but the difference highlights why this option is so important. Currently state university employees are the only ones with this defined contribution option.

Traditional pensions for new workers at Illinois universities have a vesting period of 10 years. That means if someone leaves their job or the state before they’ve completed 10 years, they won’t be eligible for anything but a refund of their contributions. Not the state match or any interest they could’ve accrued while working.

Early-career academics face higher job uncertainty and are more likely to change institutions than later-career or tenured faculty. Under higher expected mobility, defined contributions are more attractive because you don’t have to worry about losing out on retirement benefits because the vesting period is much lower at 5 years.

Advertisement

Mobility isn’t only important in academia. The ability to change careers is important for a variety of jobs today. Wage and salary workers in the public sector today have a median tenure of 6.2 years. That number is likely skewed because 3-in-4 government workers are aged 35 and older.

Younger workers tend to stay in jobs for shorter periods. Across the public and private sectors, the median tenure of workers 55 to 64 is 9.6 years and 2.7 years for workers 25 to 34. Both figures are far below the 10-year vesting requirement for most Illinois pensions.

There’s no reason to limit flexibility and control to only employees under the State University Retirement System. Senate Bill 3389 offers a step in the right direction by allowing downstate teachers to opt-in to a similar Retirement Savings Plan. But that is only the start.

Illinois should expand this option to all five of its state pension systems so that employees can choose to have more control over their retirement finances. Similar plans have been enacted in Rhode Island and Tennessee, which has one of the best-funded pension systems in the country. A defined contribution plan offers more freedom and security for retirees.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

New rule nearly doubles eligibility for Illinois ABLE savings accounts

Published

on

New rule nearly doubles eligibility for Illinois ABLE savings accounts


Illinois is making it possible for thousands more people with disabilities to set aside money for their needs without losing critical federal benefits.

A new rule, announced this week by State Treasurer Michael Frerichs, raises the eligibility age so that anyone whose disability began before age 47 can now open an ABLE (Achieving a Better Life Experience) savings account.

Advertisement

The change nearly doubles the number of Illinois residents who can use the program, which lets people with disabilities save and invest money tax-free for qualified expenses. 

Frerichs called the expansion a “game changer,” estimating that 250,000 additional Illinoisans and about 6 million people nationwide now qualify. 

“We’re happy to report that ABLE accounts are now available to anyone who acquired their disability before age 46, and I think this is a game changer for a lot of people,” Frerichs said.

Advertisement

Until this expansion, ABLE accounts were only available to people who acquired a disability before age 26. That restriction left out veterans, accident survivors, and people diagnosed with disabling conditions later in life. The new rule took effect this year after Congress responded to calls from Illinois advocates and families to expand access.

How ABLE accounts work:

Advertisement

An ABLE account functions much like a 529 college savings account. Account holders, friends, and family can contribute cash, which is then invested. The money grows tax-free as long as it is used for disability-related expenses such as housing, transportation, assistive technology, or education. Illinois also offers a state income tax deduction for contributions.

Before ABLE accounts, people with disabilities who received Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Medicaid faced strict asset limits. Having more than $2,000 in savings could mean losing those benefits. 

“This created a lot of anxiety for families who were preparing,” Frerichs said. “There’s a lot of fear for people who wanted to go out and work. What would happen if my paycheck put me over that threshold? Well, ABLE is the answer.”

Advertisement

The program allows up to $100,000 in savings without affecting federal benefits. Earnings and withdrawals remain tax-free if used for qualified expenses.

Real-life impact:

Advertisement

Frerichs shared stories from families who had to make difficult choices before ABLE accounts existed. 

“I talked to parents who had to tell their children’s employer don’t give my kid a raise,” he said. “I’ve talked to parents who talked with their financial advisors, saying, don’t name your child in your will. We created a system that put parents in horrible positions, but now we have a solution that allows them to do more long-term planning and to truly set their kids up for a better life experience.”

Stephanie Cantor, director of the Illinois ABLE program, said the expansion lets her and thousands like her save for expenses that come with disability. 

Advertisement

“Living with a disability just costs more, and it makes me think of all the ways an ABLE account could have been useful to me over the years to be able to save money and pay for these expenses,” Cantor said.

What’s next:

Advertisement

Illinois has about 8,500 ABLE account holders who have saved $121 million so far. The state treasurer’s office encourages anyone who thinks they may qualify to learn more and apply at illinoisable.com.

The Source: The information in this article was reported by FOX Chicago’s Terrence Lee. 

IllinoisNewsMoney
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Illinois

Big Ten tournament preview: An Illinois-Michigan rematch Saturday at the UC would be huge

Published

on

Big Ten tournament preview: An Illinois-Michigan rematch Saturday at the UC would be huge


The 29th Big Ten men’s basketball tournament starts Tuesday and ends Sunday at the United Center, where the champion will snip down the nets while the NCAA Tournament bracket reveal furiously gets underway.

In keeping with tradition, the NCAA selection committee will claim to have factored the Big Ten final into its seeding even though it — how to put this? — did not.

Unlike last year, when 15 teams made the Big Ten field, this tourney will include all 18 teams and begin a day sooner, because clearly a five-day event just wasn’t long enough.

A team-by-team glimpse, in order of seeding (odds via FanDuel):

Advertisement

1. MICHIGAN (29-2, 19-1)

Next: TBD, 11 a.m. Friday, BTN.

Title odds: +105.

Snip? If the ginormous frontcourt of Yaxel Lendeborg, Aday Mara and Morez Johnson Jr. brutalizes foes like it did Illinois in Champaign, it’s over-and-out for everybody else.

Or slip? Point guard Elliot Cadeau might wear down with injured L.J. Cason unable to spell him.

Advertisement

2. NEBRASKA (25-5, 15-5)

Next: TBD, 5:30 p.m. Friday, BTN.

Title odds: +1000.

Snip? No team plays harder at the defensive end, and the Huskers move the ball beautifully on offense. Is it shooter Pryce Sandfort’s time to shine?

Or slip? Is coach Fred Hoiberg allowed to win a championship at the UC? Asking for a few million friends.

Advertisement

3. MICHIGAN STATE (25-6, 15-5)

Next: TBD, approximately 8 p.m. Friday, BTN.

Title odds: +650.

Snip? Jeremy Fears is one of the best playmakers around, and we are bound by law to say it’s hard to beat Tom Izzo in March.

Or slip? As tough as this team is, it lacks the kind of star power we’ve often seen in green.

Advertisement

4. ILLINOIS (24-7, 15-5)

Next: TBD, approximately 1:30 p.m. Friday, BTN.

Title odds: +470.

Snip? If freshmen Keaton Wagler and David Mirkovic hold up to postseason competition, the shooters around them will give the Illini a shot to win it for the third time in the 2020s.

Or slip? The Illini likely would have to get past Michigan in the semis, and the first meeting was ugly.

Advertisement

5. WISCONSIN (22-9, 14-6)

Next: Washington-USC winner, approximately 1:30 p.m. Thursday, BTN.

Title odds: +3500.

Snip? The team that popped Purdue for 97 points to ruin the Boilermakers’ Senior Day can beat anybody.

Advertisement

Or slip? The team that ham-fisted its way through recent lopsided losses at Ohio State and Oregon isn’t going anywhere.

6. UCLA (21-10, 13-7)

Next: Minnesota-Rutgers winner, approximately 8 p.m. Thursday, BTN.

Title odds: +3500.

Snip? When point guard Donovan Dent is on his game, this offense — particularly shooter Tyler Bilodeau — is dangerous.

Advertisement

Or slip? The Bruins are a different team, and not in a good way, away from home.

7. PURDUE (23-8, 13-7)

Next: TBD, 5:30 p.m. Thursday, BTN.

Title odds: +550.

Snip? Braden Smith, Trey Kaufman-Renn and Fletcher Loyer have been there so many times before.

Advertisement

Or slip? Who would’ve believed the Boilers would tumble all the way to seventh? Something’s off with Matt Painter’s crew.

8. OHIO STATE (20-11, 12-8)

Next: TBD, 11 a.m. Thursday, BTN.

Title odds: +7500.

Snip? Bruce Thornton, the school’s career scoring leader, isn’t the only Buckeye who can fill it up.

Advertisement

Or slip? Statistically, this team is right down the middle in the conference. That has “also-ran” written all over it.

9. IOWA (20-11, 10-10)

Next: Oregon-Maryland winner, 11 a.m. Wednesday, Peacock.

Title odds: +5000.

Snip? Guard Bennett Stirtz is terrific, and first-year coach Ben McCollum’s postseason record (most of it at Northwest Missouri State) is unreal.

Advertisement

Or slip? Stirtz doesn’t have a whole lot in the way of sidekicks.

10. INDIANA (18-13, 9-11)

Next: Northwestern-Penn State winner, 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, BTN.

Title odds: +10000.

Snip? Guard Lamar Wilkerson led the Big Ten in scoring in league play and had multiple 40-plus-point games.

Advertisement

Or slip? Look, it’s a football school and the whole world knows it.

11. MINNESOTA (15-16, 8-12)

Next: Rutgers, approximately 8 p.m. Wednesday, BTN.

Title odds: +30000.

Snip? The Gophers have beaten three higher seeds, one of them Michigan State.

Advertisement

Or slip? Minnesota still hasn’t won this tournament. Why start now?

12. WASHINGTON (15-16, 7-13)

Next: USC, approximately 1:30 p.m. Wednesday, Peacock.

Title odds: +20000.

Snip? The Huskies went 3-3 down the stretch and had late leads in two of the losses.

Advertisement

Or slip? One NCAA win in the last 14 years kind of says it all.

13. USC (18-13, 7-13)

Next: Washington, approximately 1:30 p.m. Wednesday, Peacock.

Title odds: +30000.

Snip? A 4-1 stretch that began at Wisconsin looked really good.

Advertisement

Or slip? There have been seven straight losses since then, and star Chad Baker-Mazara was just booted from the program.

14. RUTGERS (13-18, 6-14)

Next: Minnesota, approximately 8 p.m. Wednesday, BTN.

Title odds: N/A.

Snip? A lot of steals and not many turnovers from this squad.

Advertisement

Or slip? Every league win came against Penn State, Maryland, Oregon or Northwestern.

Nick Martinelli

Northwestern forward Nick Martinelli (2) celebrates with teammates after scoring the winning basket during overtime of an NCAA college basketball game against Maryland in Evanston, Ill., Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025. (AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh) ORG XMIT: ILNH117

15. NORTHWESTERN (13-18, 5-15)

Next: Penn State, approximately 6:30 p.m. Tuesday, Peacock.

Advertisement

Title odds: +30000.

Snip? The name’s Nick Martinelli. Perhaps you’ve heard of him.

Or slip? And then there are the rest of the Wildcats.

16. OREGON (12-19, 5-15)

Next: Maryland, 4 p.m. Tuesday, Peacock.

Advertisement

Title odds: +30000.

Snip? The Ducks won four of seven down the stretch. They aren’t total pushovers.

Or slip? Injured Jackson Shelstad isn’t entering the building. At least not in shorts.

17. MARYLAND (11-20, 4-16)

Next: Oregon, 4 p.m. Tuesday, Peacock.

Advertisement

Title odds: N/A.

Snip? Freshman guard Andre Mills has been going off and scored 39 at Northwestern.

Or slip? Uh, the Terrapins still lost in Evanston.

18. PENN STATE (12-19, 3-17)

Next: Northwestern, approximately 6:30 p.m. Tuesday, Peacock.

Advertisement

Title odds: N/A.

Snip? Aside from being utterly terrible at defense, rebounding and three-point shooting, the Nittany Lions are merely subpar.

Or slip? Gee, you think?



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending