Connecticut
15 Connecticut residents on Forbes list of wealthiest Americans. Here’s who they are
With the volatile stock market still setting records this year, Connecticut’s rich are getting richer.
That is documented in Forbes magazine’s latest annual listing of the 400 wealthiest Americans.
Connecticut has 15 residents on an extended list of billionaires, which has been growing with stock prices and real estate values climbing. For years, the list marked a compilation of those whose wealth had reached $1 billion.
But now with a new cutoff of $2.9 billion to qualify for the top 400, many billionaires and wealthy Americans are no longer on the traditional list. Former president Donald J. Trump did not make the cut as Forbes calculated his net worth, which has been much in dispute, at an estimated $2.6 billion.
In Connecticut, the richest resident is Steve Cohen, the longtime hedge fund manager who is most widely known for buying the New York Mets baseball team in 2020 for $2.4 billion. Cohen’s worth is calculated at $19.8 billion.
He is followed by fellow Greenwich resident Ray Dalio, who clocks in at $15.4 billion, which is down from last year’s estimate at $19.1 billion and allows Cohen to take the top spot in Connecticut.
Dalio and his wife, Barbara, have stepped more into the public eye by trying to help at-risk youth who are in danger of dropping out of high school. A report by a consulting group said that nearly 20% of Connecticut youths between the ages of 14 and 26 in 2022 had either already dropped out of high school, were at risk of not graduating, did not have a job or college plans, or were in prison.
The Dalios appeared on stage with Gov. Ned Lamont in East Hartford High School’s gymnasium in April 2019 to talk about the problem, which is a long-running issue in the state. The Dalios pledged $100 million over five years in a high-profile partnership with the state, but the partnership was eventually dissolved over various controversies including concerns about public disclosure and the state’s freedom of information laws.
Anja Niedringhaus / AP Greenwich resident Ray Dalio is currently rated by Forbes magazine as Connecticut’s second-richest resident. He is the founder of the world’s largest hedge fund, Bridgewater Associates.
Everything is relative in the stratosphere of billionaires. Cohen and Dalio stand head and shoulders beyond the other Connecticut billionaires and their relative net worth.
At $19.8 billion, Cohen has more than six times as much wealth as Greenwich resident Vince McMahon, who has an estimated $3.1 billion from his World Wrestling Entertainment empire.
McMahon has vastly expanded the Stamford-based business that he bought from his father, and WWE matches are now shown in more than 30 languages in nearly 150 countries worldwide in a highly successful business.
As WWE has increased sharply in value since going public more than two decades ago, the parent company disclosed recently that McMahon would be selling $300 million in company stock. McMahon, 78, stepped down from running the company following various controversies and public allegations that he has denied.
Bill Pugliano, Getty Images
WWE chairman Vince McMahon, center, had his head shaved by Donald J. Trump and Bobby Lashley after losing a bet in the Battle of the Billionaires at the 2007 World Wrestling Entertainment’s Wrestlemania at Ford Field in Detroit, Mich.
Connecticut state income tax
The billionaires and near-billionaires are important players in the Connecticut economy because they pay a large share of the state income tax.
The top 2% of tax filers pay 40% of the state income tax, according to statistics by Gov. Ned Lamont’s budget office. The top 2% covers filers earning more than $500,000 per year. At the other end of the income spectrum, the bottom 54% of filers — representing more than half of the total — paid 4% of the income tax.
Besides prominent celebrities like McMahon, many of those on Forbes list have relatively lower profiles by comparison.
Todd Boehly, a Darien resident, has risen to prominence as co-owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team and L.A. Lakers basketball team. His picture was featured on the cover of Forbes, which will clearly boost his profile.
Boehly’s Greenwich-based private holding company, known as Eldridge Industries, has more than 3,000 employees and has invested in numerous ventures, including the song rights of rock superstar Bruce Springsteen.
Karen Pritzker of Branford, who is a member of the wealthy family that made its money from the Hyatt hotel chain, is tied with Boehly at $6 billion each, according to Forbes.
Mark J. Terrill/AP
Darien resident Todd Boehly is worth an estimated $6 billion, according to Forbes. As co-owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball team, he is shown here watching a game on April 30, 2022 against the Detroit Tigers.
Other Connecticut billionaires on the list include relatively low-key financiers and investors who are generally out of the public spotlight.
They include:
– Brad Jacobs, a Greenwich resident who founded XPO Logistics. At $3.7 billion, his wealth dipped slightly from last year’s estimate of $3.8 billion.
– Douglas Ostrover of Greenwich, co-founder and chief executive officer of Blue Owl Capital in Manhattan and Greenwich, at $2.9 billion.
– Michael Rees of New Canaan, a former executive at the Lehman Brothers investment bank and co-president of Blue Owl Capital, at $1.9 billion. Ostrover and Rees merged their separate firms to create Blue Owl Capital.
– Clifford S. Asness of Greenwich, a hedge fund manager and New York City native who holds a Ph.D. in finance, at $2 billion. He runs AQR Capital Management, which is named after Applied Quantitative Research. In 2009, he gained attention for criticizing then-President Barack Obama in an essay titled “Unafraid in Greenwich” after Obama had complained about hedge funds related to the bankruptcy of Chrysler.
“Angering the President is a mistake, and my views will annoy half my clients,” Asness wrote. “I hope my clients will understand that I’m entitled to my voice and to speak it loudly, just as they are in this great country. … The managers have a fiduciary obligation to look after their clients’ money as best they can, not to support the President, nor to oppose him, nor otherwise advance their personal political views. That’s how the system works.”
Alexandra Daith of Old Lyme and Lucy Stitzer of Greenwich, two sisters who have inherited wealth from Cargill, a global food giant that is privately held and still mostly owned by billionaires in the family that founded it in 1865. The company operates in low-key fashion and is less known to the general public than other giants in the food business like General Mills, Kellogg’s, and Archer Daniels Midland. Their worth is estimated at $2 billion each.
Greenwich resident Mario Gabelli, 82, is well known in the finance world for running an investment company since the 1970s. His wealth is estimated at $1.8 billion, and his philanthropic contributions prompted Fordham University to place his name on its business school.
Two Connecticut homeowners are now listed by Forbes in their home countries:
Darien resident O. Andreas Halvorsen, who co-founded a hedge fund in Greenwich known as Viking Global Investors and served on the board of Greenwich Academy, is now listed in his home country of Norway at $7.2 billion.
In the same way, Alex Behring, who co-founded 3G Capital in Greenwich, is now listed in Brazil at $6.3 billion.
Biden in Greenwich
Stephen Mandel, Jr., a longtime hedge fund manager with a Harvard MBA degree, founded Lone Pine Capital in 1997. Public records show that he contributed $1 million in 2020 to the Lincoln Project, which is operated by former Republican strategists who helped blocked Donald J. Trump’s attempt at reelection.
Mandel’s name came into the public eye when President Joe Biden visited Mandel’s Greenwich home for a fundraiser in June 2023.
“As Americans, we all owe a big thanks to the President for what he’s done the last two years,” Mandel said, according to the pool report filed by a Washington-based reporter.
For years, Republicans have predicted that some of the wealthiest residents would flee from Connecticut if taxes were raised too high. During the tenure of then-Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, taxes were increased and the three highest top rates of 6.7%, 6.9% and 6.99% were added to the state income tax. The state now has seven different income tax rates, up from three rates when Malloy took office in 2011.
Lamont, however, has repeatedly stated that he favors no increases on the state income tax beyond the current 6.99% level. Lamont has been able to block any attempts over the past six years, and Democrats do not currently have enough votes in the state House of Representatives to override a potential veto.
Lawmakers have said that some wealthy residents quietly moved out of the state at an increasing pace — taking their wealth with them to states like Florida, where there is no state income tax. Those who have moved to Florida include major Greenwich investors like Edward Lampert, Paul Tudor Jones, Thomas Peterffy, C. Dean Metropoulos, William R. Berkley, and Barry Sternlicht, according to public accounts and statements by fellow Greenwich residents.
For years, Republicans and Democrats have argued over whether the tax flight is a myth and whether wealthy, older residents move primarily for better weather as opposed to lower taxes.
Lamont himself ranks among the highest-earning tax filers in the state. During the 2022 election campaign, Lamont released his tax returns that showed that his adjusted gross income for 2021 was $54 million. That included $52.7 million in capital gains as Wall Street set records in 2021 before falling back in the following year.
The booming stock market in 2021 made a major difference as Lamont’s previous adjusted gross income had been reported as $7.77 million in 2018, $10.14 million in 2019, and $8.02 million in 2020.
Estate tax
While the Forbes list tracks those who are still working or at least collecting stock dividends, Connecticut also has ultra-wealthy families who are paying the state’s estate tax.
Anyone who died in 2023 with an estate of less than $12.9 million owed no tax in Connecticut or at the federal level — as the state exemption that has increased sharply from the past.
In Connecticut, 138 people had more than $10 million in their estate when they died, based on statewide probate records for 2021. The records show that 39 of those estates were above $15 million each and six were above $100 million.
Based on interpretations of probate law, state officials declined to reveal the names of those with some of the largest estates. Those included estates of $124.5 million from a resident of Wilton, $121.5 million from Essex, and $108 million from the Riverside section of Greenwich. Those totals reflect the size of the estates, rather than the amount of taxes paid.
The estate tax is highly volatile because state officials cannot predict the timing of anyone’s death and the exact amount of money that they will have.
As such, the projected tax collection for the current fiscal year has been reduced by $45 million, down from a projection by the legislature of $178 million to the new level of $133 million. Lamont’s budget office said in a letter to the comptroller that the reason is that “the tax continues to underperform each month” as there is slightly more than two months remaining in the fiscal year that ends on June 30.
With the state relying on fewer individuals to pay the bulk of the bills, officials at the state tax department traditionally keep a close eye on the top 100 taxpayers. Former Department of Revenue Services Commissioner Kevin B. Sullivan has said that the top 100 taxpayers, collectively, are tracked quarterly and annually to help forecast the state’s tax fortunes.
State Rep. Stephen Meskers of Greenwich, a moderate Democrat who worked in the finance industry, said that keeping the billionaires is important because they never move to Florida alone when they move the hedge fund there.
“When we drive them to Florida, they take another 50 to 100 associated individuals,” Meskers said in an interview. “The impact isn’t the individual. People tend to want to curry favor with the boss. They could be earning $400,000, $500,000 or $600,000 salaries.”
Meskers added that the state does not need to lose many individuals to have a significant impact.
“If you lose three or four of the major taxpayers, you could be down 200, 300, 400 million bucks directly,” Meskers said of the state income tax. “The question is how do we get more of them and not how much to tax them.”
Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@courant.com
Connecticut
Opinion: YIGBY could be Connecticut’s solution to health and housing crisis
Many Connecticut families are struggling to find housing or living in cramped, run-down apartments that get more expensive each year. Take for example “Sam,” a mother of two in her mid-30s. After fleeing from an abusive relationship, Sam stayed in a shelter for a period of time, but found it difficult to find a safe apartment for her and her children.
In an interview with Dr. Tricia Lewis, Sam said, “When I was first looking for an apartment, it was hard to find one because… the rents are so high [and] because a lot of landlords want cash on the spot. And if you don’t have the cash on the spot, they don’t want to deal with you.”
Sam looked for several months to find a suitable apartment, being turned away multiple times due to her source of payment, a housing voucher. This search caused a great deal of stress and worry for Sam, as it does for many other Connecticut residents who are priced out or discriminated against in their housing search.
We can do better for our people – Connecticut families need more quality, affordable housing options.
Connecticut faces a housing shortage of up to 380,000 units, and the average renter makes only $22.69 per hour, which is significantly less than the $35.42 required for a modest, two-bedroom apartment.
Under the House Bill 5396 known as “YIGBY” (Yes in Gods Backyard), Connecticut now has an opportunity to address this situation. This bill would make it easier for religious organizations like churches and synagogues to build affordable housing on their own land which often goes untouched. Religious organizations are already in a position to support this being that they look for ways to benefit and support the community around them.

This approach is not only practical, but also essential. The supply and demand for housing in Connecticut are significantly out of balance. Zillow data shows that rents and property prices have been rising gradually in recent years, putting pressure on individuals with middle-class and lower-class incomes. Renting families will continue to become more unstable as a result of this tendency if nothing is done. YIGBY provides a cost-effective and efficient means of expanding the housing supply without needing additional land for development.
This bill is particularly important because of the link between housing and health. The affordability crisis is a public health issue, not just a housing problem. Health can deteriorate when a family’s housing costs exceed half of their income. Families in “cost-burdened” situations are more likely to experience chronic stress, which is directly linked to heart disease and hypertension, and they are less likely to seek preventative care.
Children who experience this degree of housing uncertainty are exposed to toxic stress, which has an impact on their long-term academic success and brain development. Stable housing allows individuals to maintain employment, access healthcare, and build supportive social networks. It improves mental health, lowers ER visits, and makes children’s surroundings safer. In this way, investing in housing is also an investment in public health infrastructure.
YIGBY guidelines, according to their opponents, might give religious organizations unique rights to override local zoning laws. It is important to note that zoning regulations have frequently been utilized to keep affordable homes out of high opportunity neighborhoods, perpetuating racial and economic segregation.
The YIGBY strategy lowers needless obstacles that impede prompt solutions; it does not entirely eliminate oversight. “Restrictive zoning is one of the biggest constraints on housing supply in high-cost areas,” according to housing expert Jenny Schuetz. If Connecticut wants to increase housing access and health outcomes, these limitations must be addressed.
Connecticut lawmakers should move quickly by passing YIGBY legislation. By doing this, religious organizations could re-purpose their property, more affordable housing options would be available for Connecticut families, and one of the primary causes of health disparities in the state would be addressed. More importantly, it would show a commitment to innovative, community-based solutions that prioritize human well-being and dignity.
Isabela Lizano is a junior at Sacred Heart University, majoring in Health Sciences with a concentration in Public Health.
Connecticut
Man convicted almost 4 years after body found in the Connecticut River
HOLYOKE, Mass. (WGGB/WSHM) — A 24-year-old man has been convicted of first-degree murder in connection to the deadly shooting of Elis Vizcarrondo back in 2022, according to Hampden District Attorney Anthony D. Gulluni.
On July 3rd, 2022, officers arrived to the scene at the Connecticut River, finding Vizcarrondo’s body after he had been shot in the back of the head and through his right eye.
During the investigation, officials received information from witnesses that led them to 131 Clemente Street in Holyoke, where it was confirmed, the victim was killed. Officials were also able to find out there were multiple others involved.
One of the others, William Bell, was charged, but had already passed away in April 2025, while in custody at the Berkshire County Jail and House of Correction. Officials say Miguel Morales was also later charged, as an accessory after the fact.
During the trial of 24-year-old Elijah Melendez of Holyoke, it came out that Melendez had admitted to multiple people that he worked alongside Bell to kill Vizcarrondo, due to their connection with a separate homicide investigation.
Melendez was found guilty by a jury of first-degree murder, possession of a firearm without a license, and possession of ammunition without a license. His sentencing is scheduled for Friday, May 1st, in Hampden Superior Court.
The investigation was conducted through a coordinated effort between the Massachusetts State Police Detective Unit assigned to the Hampden District Attorney’s Office, along with the Holyoke Police Department and the Chicopee Police Department.
Copyright 2026 Western Mass News (WGGB/WSHM). All rights reserved.
Connecticut
Opinion: When getting care means going into debt
The email is sitting in my inbox like a countdown clock: $5,000 due to secure my surgery date. Another $7,000 required on the day of the procedure. Before even getting there, I had already paid $800 just for a consultation and thousands more from emergency room visits, trying to manage the pain.
As a college student in a single-parent household, these costs are not just overwhelming; they are destabilizing. For my family, this isn’t just a medical decision; it’s a financial crisis that affects bills, groceries, and basic stability.
This isn’t an unusual story; it’s what accessing healthcare looks like for too many people in Connecticut today. When the cost of care becomes this overwhelming, patients are forced to make impossible choices: delay treatment, go into debt, or simply go without.
This is why Connecticut lawmakers must pass SB3: An Act Concerning Health Care Affordability. The bill directly addresses one of the most urgent public health issues in our state: the rising cost of healthcare and the barriers it creates for everyday citizens. SB3 is not just a general attempt to “lower costs.” It proposes specific, actionable solutions.
The bill would establish a Connecticut Affordable Health Care Trust Fund to stabilize costs and protect residents from rising premiums, particularly as federal subsidies become uncertain. It also includes a “Connecticut Option” program designed to expand access to more affordable insurance coverage and, in the short term, replace federal premium subsidies for many residents earning up to 600% of the federal poverty level.
Healthcare affordability is not just an economic issue; it is a public health crisis. According to a report from theKaiser Family Foundation, nearly half of U.S. adults report difficulty affording healthcare, and many delay or skip necessary services as a result. These delays can lead to worsening conditions, more emergency visits, and higher long-term costs for both patients and the healthcare system. In my case, postponing treatment for endometriosis only led to repeated ER visits, each one adding to the financial and physical burden.
Ella Nocera-DeJulioConnecticut is not immune to these trends. Reports show that residents across the state, especially those with low and moderate incomes, struggle with high premiums, deductibles, and out-of-pocket costs. Even those with insurance often face significant financial barriers when seeking care. This reality contradicts the very purpose of a healthcare system: to provide timely, effective treatment without causing financial harm.
Some critics argue that bills like SB3 could increase government spending or place additional strain on healthcare providers. Others question whether it goes far enough, pointing out gaps in coverage, such as limited inclusion of certain populations. These concerns deserve attention, but they do not outweigh the urgency of the problem. In fact, SB3 is designed as both a short-term solution to stabilize costs and a long-term framework to explore broader reforms.
Passing SB3 would help more than just individual patients. When people can afford regular checkups and early treatment, long-term illnesses are easier to manage, fewer people end up in the emergency room, and healthcare costs go down overall. This leads to healthier communities and a better-functioning healthcare system. In simpler terms, making healthcare more affordable isn’t just the right thing to do; it’s also a smart decision.
My experience is just one example, but it reflects a much larger issue affecting communities across Connecticut. No one should have to delay a necessary surgery or accumulate thousands of dollars in debt just to receive basic medical care. Healthcare shouldn’t be something only available to people who can afford it, but a basic right supported by strong and effective policies.
Connecticut has a real chance to fix a system that is clearly not working for many people. Passing SB3 would help lower costs and make it easier for residents to get the care they need without financial stress. It’s time for lawmakers to take action and make healthcare more affordable and accessible for everyone.
Ella Nocera-DeJulio is a sophomore at Sacred Heart University, majoring in Health Sciences, concentrating in Occupational Therapy.
-
Colorado2 minutes ago‘It really tore me up’: Funeral home probation leaves southern Colorado woman questioning care of her father’s remains
-
Connecticut8 minutes agoOpinion: YIGBY could be Connecticut’s solution to health and housing crisis
-
Delaware14 minutes agoFBI offers reward in search for missing Delaware County man
-
Florida20 minutes agoNo. 10 Florida State softball comes up short on the road at Florida
-
Georgia26 minutes agoGeorgia cop placed on leave after body-slamming man in Walmart: ‘I thought he was dead’
-
Hawaii32 minutes agoHawaii County Surf Forecast for April 29, 2026 | Big Island Now
-
Idaho38 minutes ago
Idaho Steelheads | STEELHEADS ELIMINATED IN 6-3 LOSS TO AMERICANS
-
Illinois44 minutes agoWorkers Memorial held in Decatur to remember lives lost on the job