Connect with us

Northeast

Battleground state Dem distances himself from defund movement, but political record shows different story

Published

on

Battleground state Dem distances himself from defund movement, but political record shows different story

Longtime Pennsylvania Democrat Sen. Bob Casey has distanced himself from the defund the police movement in the run-up to his self-described “tough” election this year, despite recent endorsements from groups advocating that police departments be defunded and promoting a bill that would have overhauled policing practices at the height of 2020’s protests and riots. 

“Senator Casey has a long and clear record of working alongside law enforcement and delivering hundreds of millions of dollars to fund bulletproof vests, SWAT gear, police cars, and ballistics shields for officers,” Maddy McDaniel, spokesperson for the Casey campaign, told Fox News Digital this month. “Senator Casey doesn’t support defunding the police, and he’s voted to block federal funding from cities and towns that defund their police departments.” 

The campaign’s response comes after the longtime Keystone State senator received endorsements this year from pro-defund advocacy groups Indivisible Philadelphia and the Pennsylvania state chapter of Indivisible.

“Indivisible Philadelphia and the #IndivisiblesOfPA enthusiastically support @Bob_Casey for re-election to the US Senate! #PASen,” Indivisible Philadelphia tweeted last month.

LONGTIME PA DEM SILENT ON SUPPORT FOR FRESHMAN ‘SQUAD’ MEMBER AFTER HIS NAME IS QUIETLY REMOVED FROM SITE

Advertisement

Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., speaks during a campaign rally in Newtown, Pennsylvania, on Nov. 6, 2022. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images)

Indivisible Philadelphia describes itself as a “grassroots organization of volunteers determined to advance a progressive agenda by resisting corruption, authoritarianism, and inequality in our governmental institutions.” The group has also repeatedly advocated for police departments to be defunded, most notably in 2020 when defund the police and Black Lives Matter protests and riots unfolded in cities from coast to coast.

“We won’t stop until they #DefundThePolice,” the group’s website reads in a June 25, 2020, post titled “Make Your Demand!”

“When we said #DefundThePolice we meant fewer officers on the street terrorizing Black and Brown residents. We meant moving away from the racist system of criminalization and penal punishment, and moving toward community-led public safety methods and programs,” the post continued, which came after the death of George Floyd at the hands of police in Minneapolis that year.

DEM SEN BOB CASEY SLAMMED BY GOP FOR SHIFTING IMMIGRATION STANCES: ‘COMPLICIT IN THE CRISIS’

Advertisement

The advocacy group’s leader recently told Fox News Digital that police should be funded for “policing work” while other funds should be directed to support social workers and health officials to handle non-policing issues in communities.

“Our position has always been that police should be funded to do policing work, and that for other kinds of problems in the community, adequate funding should be provided for health care professionals, social workers and mental health professionals as appropriate,” Indivisible Philadelphia group leader Vicki Miller said.

Demonstrators in Rochester, New York, hold signs at a Sept. 6, 2020, protest for Daniel Prude, who died after police put a spit hood over his head during his arrest on March 23, 2020. (Reuters/Brendan McDermid)

Casey’s endorsement follows him outlining on his official Senate page that “we must reform” policing systems in the U.S., co-sponsoring the Justice in Policing Act of 2020, and even drawing the ire of law enforcement officials in the state after Indivisible Philadelphia threw its support behind him. 

“At a time when there were four shootings in four days on our local public transit system, and law enforcement across the commonwealth is understaffed, Casey’s decision to align himself with these defund the police activists is alarming and extremely dangerous,” said Folcroft Deputy Police Chief Chris Eiserman, who is also the Delaware County FOP Lodge 27 president, during a recent press conference with other law enforcement officials.

Advertisement

Smoke rises from a burning police vehicle on May 30, 2020, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Casey joined Democrat New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker and then-California Sen. Kamala Harris in 2020 to promote the Justice in Policing Act of 2020, which was introduced after Floyd’s death. The bill, which did not pass, would have overhauled the qualified immunity doctrine – which protects police from lawsuits alleging that an official violated a plaintiff’s rights – and provided grants to state attorneys general to conduct ​​policing practice investigations and create investigation processes for allegations of police misconduct.

The bill also would have banned choke holds and changed the use of force standard for federal officers; made conspiracy to commit a hate crime a federal crime; mandate officers to receive racial, religious and discriminatory profiling training; and create a federal registry of all federal, state and local law enforcement regarding misconduct complaints or disciplinary records.

COOKIE MONSTER HIDES SEN BOB CASEY’S REPLY ON X AFTER DEM SOUGHT CAMPAIGN DONATION: ‘CAN YOU CHIP IN?’

“We must end police brutality and systematic racism in policing,” Casey said in a press release about the bill in 2020. “It is time for us to create structural change that safeguards every American’s right to safety and equal justice. I am proud to cosponsor the Justice in Policing Act of 2020, which will hold police accountable and improve transparency in policing.”

Advertisement

Police officers in the state railed against the bill at the time, as well as an op-ed Casey penned that argued the legislation would help address “systemic racism in policing.”

“For too long, we have looked to increased training or increased resources as if they alone will solve the systemic issues in our law enforcement. And, too many times, we have witnessed the tragic consequences of our inability to fully implement a comprehensive solution to address the racial injustice and police brutality that permeates our nation’s history,” Casey wrote in the op-ed.

Scott L. Bohn, the executive director of the Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association, fired back in his own op-ed shortly after Casey’s opinion piece “seemingly maligned over 1,000 professional and dedicated law enforcement executives in the commonwealth.”

“The senator’s commentary, while politically expedient, lends itself to potentially shortsighted decisions that may have an adverse or unintended consequence,” Bohn wrote. “The opinion he expressed does not inform nor does it reflect the law enforcement environment in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania’s professional police chiefs are committed to public service and ensuring our communities are safe. Pennsylvanians need to work together and against social injustice and make our Commonwealth equally safe for all its citizens.”

Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call via Getty Images/File)

Advertisement

Fox News Digital obtained a copy of a letter that Casey reportedly sent to police officers who contacted him with concerns over the bill. In the letter, he doubled down on the legislation that would “put in place the most significant police reforms in our Nation’s history by focusing on officer accountability, data transparency and police practices and training.”

“Pennsylvanians and people across our Nation are angry, sad, tired and desperate for change. The murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer has reawakened our national attention not only to the significant concerns over the relationship between law enforcement and those they serve, but to the centuries of injustice and systemic oppression that led to this tragedy,” the response letter reads. 

REPUBLICAN DAVE MCCORMICK LAUNCHES BID FOR VULNERABLE SENATE SEAT IN BATTLEGROUND STATE

In 2021, Casey did vote for an amendment that would have blocked federal funding to jurisdictions that defunded the police, supported the American Rescue Plan – which provided more than $65 million for Pennsylvania policing funds – and backed legislation last year that provided $1 billion in federal funding for law enforcement agencies across the nation.

Casey, who has served as a senator since 2007, has said that he’s bracing for his “toughest” re-election campaign this year in an anticipated race against Republican Dave McCormick.

Advertisement

“It’ll be a close, tough race,” he recently told NBC. “But look, there’s a lot on the line every time. Every time I’ve run for public office in Pennsylvania, I’ve had to earn the vote and the trust of the people. And I got to do that again.”

Dave McCormick (Jeff Swensen/Getty Images/File)

McCormick is an Army combat veteran who served as the Commerce Department’s undersecretary of Commerce for Industry and Security as well as undersecretary of the Treasury Department’s Office of International Affairs in former President George W. Bush’s administration. 

McCormick has received the endorsement of 47 sheriffs in the state, and he took issue with Indivisible Philadelphia’s endorsement of Casey in a comment to Fox News Digital.

DEMOCRAT SEN BOB CASEY CONCEDES THERE’S NO ‘VIDEOTAPE’ THAT’LL DISPROVE BIDEN’S AGE CONCERNS

Advertisement

“Bob Casey headlined an event for Indivisible Philadelphia where he gladly accepted the endorsement of these Defund the Police activists, once again failing to stand up for our men and women in blue. This is a group that said, ‘We won’t stop until they defund the police, called for ‘fewer officers on the street,’ and advocated to ‘end cash bail.’ Pennsylvania deserves better,” McCormick wrote.

Casey has also received endorsements from law enforcement, including from Delaware County Sheriff Jerry L. Sanders Jr.

“Bob Casey has proven he’ll prioritize public safety for Delaware County and has stuck his neck out to give officers the resources and support they need to do the job. His opponent has only proven he’ll prioritize himself,” Sanders said in a comment to Fox News Digital.

The state’s Senate primaries will be held this month. Both Casey and McCormick are running unopposed in their respective primaries.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Northeast

Federal judge disqualifies US attorney, tosses subpoenas targeting NY AG Letitia James

Published

on

Federal judge disqualifies US attorney, tosses subpoenas targeting NY AG Letitia James

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal judge on Thursday disqualified a U.S. attorney in upstate New York and tossed out subpoenas he issued to state Attorney General Letitia James.

In a 24-page ruling, Judge Lorna Schofield, an Obama appointee, ruled that John Sarcone has been unlawfully serving as the acting U.S. attorney for the Northern District of New York. 

“When the Executive branch of government skirts restraints put in place by Congress and then uses that power to subject political adversaries to criminal investigations, it acts without lawful authority,” Schofield wrote. 

FEDERAL JUDGE DISQUALIFIES ACTING NEVADA US ATTORNEY FROM HANDLING CASES

Advertisement

U.S. Attorney John A. Sarcone III delivers a speech after being sworn in on March 17, 2025, at the James T. Foley U.S. Courthouse in Albany, New York. (Will Waldron/Albany Times Union via Getty Images)

“The subpoenas are unenforceable due to a threshold defect: Mr. Sarcone was not lawfully serving as Acting U.S. Attorney when the subpoenas were issued,” the judge wrote.

James challenged Sarcone’s authority after he issued subpoenas seeking information about lawsuits she filed against President Donald Trump. She claimed he had committed fraud in his business dealings, and separately against the National Rifle Association and some of its former leaders, The Associated Press reported.

James has claimed that the subpoenas were part of a campaign over her investigations into Trump allies. 

“This decision is an important win for the rule of law and we will continue to defend our office’s successful litigation from this administration’s political attacks,” a spokesperson for James’ office told Fox News Digital. 

Advertisement

Fox News Digital has reached out to James and the Justice Department on the judge’s subpoena decision. 

MIKE DAVIS: WHY SCOTUS MUST REINSTATE TRUMP US ATTORNEYS ALINA HABA AND LINDSEY HALLIGAN

New York Attorney General Letitia James speaks to the media outside the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Norfolk, Oct. 24, 2025. (Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)

The DOJ contends that Sarcone was properly appointed and that his subpoenas were valid. 

Attorney General Pam Bondi appointed Sarcone an interim U.S. attorney for 120 days. When that term expired, a federal court declined to extend his tenure.

Advertisement

“On the same day that the judges declined to extend Mr. Sarcone’s appointment, the Department took coordinated steps – through personnel moves and shifting titles – to install Mr. Sarcone as Acting U.S. Attorney. Federal law does not permit such a workaround,” the ruling states. 

Federal judges have also disqualified prosecutors in Nevada, the Los Angeles area and Virginia.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Lindsey Halligan’s dismissal as Virginia’s top federal prosecutor resulted in the tossing of indictments against James and former FBI Director James Comey.

On Tuesday, a federal judge ordered Halligan to explain why she continues to call herself the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia despite another judge in November determining that she was unlawfully appointed to the role.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

New York

Video: New York City Nurses Go on Strike

Published

on

Video: New York City Nurses Go on Strike

new video loaded: New York City Nurses Go on Strike

transcript

transcript

New York City Nurses Go on Strike

Nearly 15,000 nurses at major New York City hospitals went on strike on Monday, demanding more robust staffing levels, higher pay and better safety precautions.

Chanting: “If we don’t get it — shut it down! “How can we as nurses be inside taking care of patients when we don’t have health care? We need to have good health care so we stay strong, so we can go in there day after day. Nursing is a 24/7 job. We don’t get a break. We’re there to take care of these patients, and that’s what we’re going to do. But we need the health care to do that.” “All parties must return immediately to the negotiating table and not leave. They must bargain in good faith.” “That’s right.” “And they must arrive at a deal that is satisfactory to all, that allows the nurses who work in this city to live in this city.”

Advertisement
Nearly 15,000 nurses at major New York City hospitals went on strike on Monday, demanding more robust staffing levels, higher pay and better safety precautions.

By Meg Felling

January 12, 2026

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Massachusetts Senate to finally debate Boston Mayor Wu’s contentious tax shift bill

Published

on

Massachusetts Senate to finally debate Boston Mayor Wu’s contentious tax shift bill


Boston Mayor Michelle Wu’s stalled tax shift bill will be taken up by the state Senate Thursday for the first time since it was killed there more than a year ago, but this time as an amendment filed for an alternate Senate-led tax relief proposal.

State Sen. Michael Rush, a Boston Democrat, filed an amendment to state Sen. William Brownsberger’s property tax shock bill that mirrors the language included in a home rule petition the mayor has been pushing for nearly two years that would shift more of the city’s tax burden from the residential to commercial sector.

“Property tax relief is a pressing issue for my constituents — and residents throughout the state,” Rush said Monday in a statement to the Herald. “On behalf of the people of Boston, I have filed the home rule petition passed by the Boston City Council to provide property tax relief for Boston residents.

“As the Senate considers several worthy proposals designed to address affordability in the Commonwealth, I am glad this proposal will be part of the discussion,” Rush said.

Advertisement

Wu’s office told the Herald Saturday that the mayor had requested the amendment.

“Every senator has the opportunity to submit amendments related to these bills by Monday, and we have asked Boston’s senators to offer an amendment with our residential tax relief language that has been vetted thoroughly and never received a vote,” a Wu spokesperson said in a statement. “We are following closely and hope the final bills will include this needed relief for residents.”

Wu has said her legislation is aimed at lowering the 13% tax hike the average single-family homeowner is projected to face this year. Third-quarter tax bills went out to homeowners earlier this month.

The mayor’s bill seeks to shift more of the city’s tax burden onto commercial property owners, beyond the 175% state limit, for a three-year period.

It is set to be debated, along with several other amendments that have been filed by senators for Brownsberger’s property tax shock bill, at Thursday’s session.

Advertisement

“All amendments filed by members of the Senate will be considered by the full body during our session on Thursday,” a spokesperson for Senate President Karen Spilka’s office said Monday in a statement to the Herald.

A vote is expected on the bill and underlying amendments on the same day, according to state Sen. Nick Collins, a South Boston Democrat whose alternative tax relief bill and amendments will also be considered.

Collins, who opposes the tax shift element of the mayor’s home rule petition and helped lead the push to kill it on the Senate floor in late 2024, has put forward a bill and amendments that include other elements of what Wu has proposed.

He’s pushing for tax rebates for low- and middle-income homeowners who already receive the residential tax exemption by using surplus funds, along with senior, veterans and small business tax relief provisions.

“I think that the relief measures are positive in terms of the amendments that I and others have filed that are relief in nature or relief options, but I think anything that involves a tax increase is going to be difficult,” Collins told the Herald Monday when asked about the chances for the mayor’s proposal.

Advertisement

“Especially when the city is sitting on $552 million of what they consider to be free cash, it’s hard to make the case that tax increase is necessary,” Collins added.

In a statement issued by his office, Collins added that the city’s decision to hike residential property taxes by double-digits “with so much in the City of Boston’s surplus fund” was “unnecessary, unfair and clearly inequitable.”

“To cancel out that tax increase, my legislation would authorize the city to issue direct rebates to homeowners,” Collins said.

He pointed to a similar approach that he said was taken at the state level in 2022, when the governor and legislature issued rebates after tax revenues exceeded the cap established under voter-approved state law, Chapter 62F, which limits the growth of state tax collections.

In terms of Rush’s amendment, Collins said he’s also concerned that the senator’s language would make the mayor’s tax shift bill applicable statewide, rather than just in Boston.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending