Connect with us

Lifestyle

When you wish upon the stars: My 3 big hopes for Oscar night

Published

on

When you wish upon the stars: My 3 big hopes for Oscar night

Kevin Winter/Getty Images


It’s almost here: what I hope will be one of the most audience-friendly, well-rounded Oscar ceremonies in a long time. There are big, big movies nominated, and there are little, intimate movies nominated. There are a ton of first-time nominees. There are films people ran out to see. Other than the ongoing reluctance to engage with horror, this is a pretty decent representation of the year in film — not only as critics experienced it, but as regular audiences experienced it.

When you’re so satisfied with the nominees, it can be challenging to even figure out what to hope for as you watch, but that doesn’t mean I won’t do it. In fact, I have three pretty specific wishes for Sunday night’s ceremony.

I wish for Lily Gladstone to win best actress.

I bow to no one in my admiration of Emma Stone, nominated for Poor Things, who has generally been considered the other frontrunner in this race. Stone’s range is impressive and her work in this particular film is blissfully weird. But Gladstone, despite having been in the business for many years, just exploded this year after people saw her in Killers of the Flower Moon. That performance, like Stone’s, is curious and complicated, even if it’s much (much) quieter. Her character, Mollie, has to be smart but subject to manipulation, and has to retain her cleverness and independence even as her husband schemes under her nose. It’s a tremendously tough balance, and Gladstone handles it expertly.

Advertisement

And honestly, even apart from her history-making nomination as the first Native American woman nominated as best actress, the Oscars need new faces. They need to recognize and celebrate people who weren’t big stars a year ago. Given a choice between two excellent performances, one from an established person and one from perhaps the breakthrough performer of the year, I will choose the latter every time.

I wish to see good performances and not too many Kimmel bits.

I have come to appreciate Jimmy Kimmel as an Oscars host. I think he solidly walks the line between enough respect and enough irreverence, and he knows how to keep the thing moving when he’s on stage. I will always admire the fact that he got us through La La Land-no-wait-Moonlight-gate.

However. Kimmel has also sometimes subjected the Oscars audience to what feel like self-indulgent extensions of his late-night show, and because the Oscars are not his late-night show and everybody in the room has business they want to get to, those segments usually feel awkward and much too long. I hope to see him host primarily via … you know, regular hosting. Not bits.

And while we’re talking about elements other than the handing out of awards, I always hope for strong performances of the original songs. It’s a strong field this year, with no real duds. I am excited to see Ryan Gosling take on “I’m Just Ken” live, but honestly, I bet they’ll all be fun. Even the one I think is the least musically interesting, Diane Warren’s “The Fire Inside” from Flamin’ Hot, is probably going to be a shot in the arm for a long ceremony as performed by Becky G.

I wish for speeches that take their cues from the recent Emmys.

At the Emmy Awards in January, winners were given the opportunity to have pre-submitted thank-yous show up at the bottom of the screen. That removed some of the pressure to remember or read a list of names, which allowed the speeches to be more heartfelt. As far as I know, the Oscars do not have this option on tap for winners. But I do hope that, having seen how well this worked for the Emmys, winners will feel freed up to speak from the heart. It may help that the ceremony is starting an hour earlier this year, meaning it’s scheduled to run four hours instead of three. One would certainly hope that at least some of that time will be devoted to keeping those who are being honored from being rushed off the stage to make room for montages.

Advertisement

This piece also appeared in NPR’s Pop Culture Happy Hour newsletter. Sign up for the newsletter so you don’t miss the next one, plus get weekly recommendations about what’s making us happy.

Listen to Pop Culture Happy Hour on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Lifestyle

The 11 most challenged books of 2025, according to the American Library Association

Published

on

The 11 most challenged books of 2025, according to the American Library Association

The American Library Association’s list of the most frequently challenged books of 2025 includes Sold by Patricia McCormick, The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky and Maia Kobabe’s Gender Queer: A Memoir.

American Library Association


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

American Library Association

The American Library Association has released its annual list of the most commonly challenged books at libraries across the United States.

According to the ALA, the 11 most frequently targeted books include several tied titles. They are:

1. Sold by Patricia McCormick
2. The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky
3. Gender Queer: A Memoir by Maia Kobabe
4. Empire of Storms by Sarah J. Maas
5. (tie) Last Night at the Telegraph Club by Malinda Lo
5. (tie) Tricks by Ellen Hopkins
7. A Court of Thorns and Roses by Sarah J. Maas
8. (tie) A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess
8. (tie) Identical by Ellen Hopkins
8. (tie) Looking for Alaska by John Green
8. (tie) Storm and Fury by Jennifer L. Armentrout

Advertisement

Many of these individual titles also appear on a 2024-25 report issued last October by PEN America, a separate group dedicated to free expression, which looked at book challenges and bans specifically within public schools.

The ALA says that it documented 4,235 unique titles being challenged in 2025 – the second-highest year on record for library challenges. (The highest ever was in 2023, with 4,240 challenges documented – only five more than in this most recent year.)

According to the ALA, 40% of the materials challenged in 2025 were representations of LGBTQ+ people and those of people of color.

In all, the ALA documented 713 attempts across the United States in 2025 to censor library materials and services; 487 of those challenges targeted books.

According to the ALA, 92% of all book challenges to libraries came from “pressure groups,” government officials and local decision makers. While 20.8% came from pressure groups such as Moms for Liberty (as the ALA cited in an email to NPR), 70.9% of challenges originated with government officials and other “decision makers,” such as local board officials or administrators.

Advertisement

In a more detailed breakdown, the ALA notes that 31% of challenges came from elected government officials and and 40% from board members or administrators. In its full report, the ALA states that only 2.7% of such challenges originated with parents, and 1.4% with individual library users.

Fifty-one percent of challenges were attempted at public libraries, and 37% involved school libraries. The remaining challenges of 2025 targeted school curriculums and higher education.

The ALA defines a book “ban” as the removal of materials, including books, from a library. A “challenge,” in this organization’s definition, is an attempt to have a library resource removed, or access to it restricted.

The ALA is a non-partisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to American libraries and librarians.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

BoF and Marriott Luxury Group Host the Luxury Leaders Salon

Published

on

BoF and Marriott Luxury Group Host the Luxury Leaders Salon
On the eve of Milan Design Week, 15 of the industry’s most influential founders, executives and creative directors gathered at Lake Como’s newly opened Edition hotel for an intimate, off-the-record conversation about where luxury goes next.
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

We beef with the Pope and admire the Stanley Cup : Wait Wait… Don’t Tell Me!

Published

on

We beef with the Pope and admire the Stanley Cup : Wait Wait… Don’t Tell Me!

Promo image with Phil Pritchard, Alzo Slade, and Peter Sagal

Bruce Bennett, Arnold Turner, NPR/Getty Images, NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Bruce Bennett, Arnold Turner, NPR/Getty Images, NPR

This week, Phil Pritchard, NHL’s Keeper of the Stanley Cup, joins us to about taking the cup jet-skiing and panelists Alonzo Bodden, Adam Burke, and Dulcé Sloan beef with the Pope and get misdiagnosed. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending