Connect with us

Lifestyle

When you wish upon the stars: My 3 big hopes for Oscar night

Published

on

When you wish upon the stars: My 3 big hopes for Oscar night

Kevin Winter/Getty Images


It’s almost here: what I hope will be one of the most audience-friendly, well-rounded Oscar ceremonies in a long time. There are big, big movies nominated, and there are little, intimate movies nominated. There are a ton of first-time nominees. There are films people ran out to see. Other than the ongoing reluctance to engage with horror, this is a pretty decent representation of the year in film — not only as critics experienced it, but as regular audiences experienced it.

When you’re so satisfied with the nominees, it can be challenging to even figure out what to hope for as you watch, but that doesn’t mean I won’t do it. In fact, I have three pretty specific wishes for Sunday night’s ceremony.

I wish for Lily Gladstone to win best actress.

I bow to no one in my admiration of Emma Stone, nominated for Poor Things, who has generally been considered the other frontrunner in this race. Stone’s range is impressive and her work in this particular film is blissfully weird. But Gladstone, despite having been in the business for many years, just exploded this year after people saw her in Killers of the Flower Moon. That performance, like Stone’s, is curious and complicated, even if it’s much (much) quieter. Her character, Mollie, has to be smart but subject to manipulation, and has to retain her cleverness and independence even as her husband schemes under her nose. It’s a tremendously tough balance, and Gladstone handles it expertly.

Advertisement

And honestly, even apart from her history-making nomination as the first Native American woman nominated as best actress, the Oscars need new faces. They need to recognize and celebrate people who weren’t big stars a year ago. Given a choice between two excellent performances, one from an established person and one from perhaps the breakthrough performer of the year, I will choose the latter every time.

I wish to see good performances and not too many Kimmel bits.

I have come to appreciate Jimmy Kimmel as an Oscars host. I think he solidly walks the line between enough respect and enough irreverence, and he knows how to keep the thing moving when he’s on stage. I will always admire the fact that he got us through La La Land-no-wait-Moonlight-gate.

However. Kimmel has also sometimes subjected the Oscars audience to what feel like self-indulgent extensions of his late-night show, and because the Oscars are not his late-night show and everybody in the room has business they want to get to, those segments usually feel awkward and much too long. I hope to see him host primarily via … you know, regular hosting. Not bits.

And while we’re talking about elements other than the handing out of awards, I always hope for strong performances of the original songs. It’s a strong field this year, with no real duds. I am excited to see Ryan Gosling take on “I’m Just Ken” live, but honestly, I bet they’ll all be fun. Even the one I think is the least musically interesting, Diane Warren’s “The Fire Inside” from Flamin’ Hot, is probably going to be a shot in the arm for a long ceremony as performed by Becky G.

I wish for speeches that take their cues from the recent Emmys.

At the Emmy Awards in January, winners were given the opportunity to have pre-submitted thank-yous show up at the bottom of the screen. That removed some of the pressure to remember or read a list of names, which allowed the speeches to be more heartfelt. As far as I know, the Oscars do not have this option on tap for winners. But I do hope that, having seen how well this worked for the Emmys, winners will feel freed up to speak from the heart. It may help that the ceremony is starting an hour earlier this year, meaning it’s scheduled to run four hours instead of three. One would certainly hope that at least some of that time will be devoted to keeping those who are being honored from being rushed off the stage to make room for montages.

Advertisement

This piece also appeared in NPR’s Pop Culture Happy Hour newsletter. Sign up for the newsletter so you don’t miss the next one, plus get weekly recommendations about what’s making us happy.

Listen to Pop Culture Happy Hour on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Lifestyle

‘Alice and Steve’ might be a mess — but it’s also too fun to stop watching

Published

on

‘Alice and Steve’ might be a mess — but it’s also too fun to stop watching

In Alice and Steve, Jemaine Clement and Nicola Walker play long-time friends who turn on each other after he gets involved with her 26-year-old daughter.

Lara Cornell/Disney+


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Lara Cornell/Disney+

I grew up watching episodic shows on network TV, nearly all of them formulaic but some indelibly great. Then, like everyone else, I moved into the days of what my colleague David Bianculli dubbed Platinum TV, where series like The Sopranos and The Wire and Fleabag aspired to something higher. What both these eras had in common was that their shows were carefully crafted — they had an internal logic, and a tone, that held them together.

In recent years, though, there’s been a proliferation of shows that, possibly obeying some algorithm, care less for coherence than sensation. They lurch among tones, from cuteness to sentimentality to meanness, stirring in random plot twists along the way. Bouncing all over the emotional map, these shows depend on compelling actors and a few memorable scenes to make us overlook their loose construction.

A great example is Alice and Steve, an entertaining but sometimes exasperating six-part British comedy on Hulu about two 50-something best friends who turn on each other after he gets involved with her 26-year-old daughter.

Advertisement

While the premise is juicy, it’s also a tad yucky, and I mainly tuned in because its title characters are played by performers Jemaine Clement from Flight of the Conchords and Nicola Walker, whom I’ve raved up on this show more than once.

The series starts poorly with Steve and Alice going on a cutesy bender after a friend’s funeral. Now, I always hate drunk scenes, which are an invitation to overact. As Clement and Walker bray their lines, we learn that Steve’s a divorced celebrity hair stylist who can’t find a girlfriend while Alice is a clothes designer with a doting younger husband, nicely played by Joel Fry, a sweetie-pie of a teenage son — that’s Tyrese Eaton-Dyce — and, of course, that 26-year-old daughter, Izzy, who has inherited her mother’s willfulness. Played by Yali Topol Margalith, Izzy kickstarts the plot by flirting with Steve. Predictably, he succumbs.

Almost immediately, they think they’re in love. While the weak-willed Steve wants to hide their romance — he knows it’s inappropriate — Izzy just blurts out the facts to her mom. Alice flips. And from hereon out in this series where the women are as alpha as the men are hangdog, Alice drives the action. Betrayed and violently angry, she’ll do whatever it takes to break them up — no matter who gets hurt. Her antics unleash Steve’s own malice. We’re in Beef territory.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

How to enter your Sporty Spice era : It’s Been a Minute

Published

on

How to enter your Sporty Spice era : It’s Been a Minute

How to enter your Sporty Spice era.

Getty Images/quantic69/Olga Kurbatova/Anastasiia Zvonary/Photo Illustration by NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Getty Images/quantic69/Olga Kurbatova/Anastasiia Zvonary/Photo Illustration by NPR

Reality dating and professional sports are not as different as you’d think.

Brittany is in her Sporty Spice era – she watched the NBA playoffs, she’s following World Cup games, and she’s watching the New York Liberty play their WNBA season. These games are daily – and so is the reality dating show Love Island. And she noticed that the two formats are not very different at all. Defector.com staff writer and co-owner Kelsey McKinney came to the same conclusion – so the two of them discuss why these games of athleticism and love can bring us together… and why they get valued differently in our culture.

For more episodes on sports and reality TV, check out:
Get rich or die trying: how sports betting is changing our love of the game
Is this the end of reality TV?
The ugly truth of America’s expensive homes

Advertisement

Support Public Media. Join NPR Plus.
Follow Brittany on Instagram: @bmluse

This episode was produced by Liam McBain. It was edited by Neena Pathak. Our Supervising Producer is Cher Vincent. Our Executive Producer is Barton Girdwood. Our VP of Programming is Yolanda Sangweni.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Luxury Clients Want Meaning More Than Status

Published

on

Luxury Clients Want Meaning More Than Status
The era of buying luxury purely for status and visibility is giving way to something more personal, centred on identity, connection and self-expression. While emotion sits at the heart of brand desire across both the US and China, its expression diverges sharply between markets, according to BoF Insights and McKinsey’s report ‘Face to Face With Luxury Clients.’
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending