San Francisco, CA
Propositions E and F in San Francisco Appear Headed for Victory | KQED
Breed’s critics have said the electorate seems motivated by how they feel about crime, not the reality of how much crime is actually occuring.
Her allies hope the success of Proposition E and F will demonstrate the mayor is taking action on San Franciscans’ concerns about crime and open-air drug use, as Breed campaigns for reelection in November.
“Crime in 2023 was down to the lowest it’s been in ten years, not including the pandemic.” she said. “And I know that people are starting to feel the difference, and we have to make sure we continue that momentum. And these are additional tools that are going to help us deliver some real results for San Francisco.”
Breed added that the police commission “in some instances, has gone too far, and Proposition E is making it clear that, look, we want reforms, but we want balance and we want safety. We can have all of them.”
Proposition E would weaken the authority of the citizen-led San Francisco Police Commission. It would also allow the San Francisco Police Department to deploy surveillance technology like facial recognition, implement public surveillance cameras and drones, loosen restrictions around vehicle chases, and exempt officers from filing paperwork after using force on a suspect, so long as the person suffered no injuries.
The Yes on E campaign raised $849,000, with its top contributors including Ron Conway, a tech sector investor, and Chris Larsen, the CEO of Ripple. A separate campaign for Proposition E started by mayoral candidate Daniel Lurie raised $699,000.
The ACLU of Northern California led the opposition to Proposition E and raised $200,000 to beat it. The organization argued more police chases would endanger lives, and expanding police surveillance power will infringe on privacy rights.
Proposition F would allow the city to require welfare recipients to be drug tested and enter treatment programs if they’re suspected of using illegal drugs. If a person declined treatment, they would no longer get cash and could be evicted from their housing. More than 5,000 San Franciscans used welfare last year, according to the County Adult Assistance Program. The Human Services Agency administers the program, and estimates roughly 30% of city welfare recipients have a substance use disorder.
The Yes on F campaign raised $650,000. There was substantial funding raised against Proposition F.
Both ballot measures were born from frustration.
In 2022, Breed clashed with her own appointee to the citizen-led San Francisco Police Commission, Max Carter-Oberstone. He now serves as the body’s vice president and led multiple reform efforts.
Breed authored Proposition E to weaken the police commission and reject its recent policy changes. If approved, public hearings would be required to be held in all 10 district stations before the commission could amend the department’s procedures. Only the chief of police could veto the new hearing process, which would allow the police department to slow the commission’s efforts when they disagree.
Breed also voiced concern with the city’s welfare system. Last week she revealed 40 people arrested for drug use in the Tenderloin and South of Market over the last year were defrauding the County Adult Assistance Program by falsely claiming they live in San Francisco, which is a requirement to be eligible for the welfare program.
San Francisco, CA
3-alarm fire burns San Francisco Tenderloin residential building
A large fire burned at a six-story residential building in San Francisco’s Tenderloin District early Friday morning, leaving dozens displaced, officials said.
The fire started at around 3 a.m. at a building on Golden Gate Avenue near Taylor and Market streets, adjacent to the Golden Gate Theatre. The San Francisco Fire Department said the fire started on the top floor and reached three alarms, spreading to the attic and roof of the building. Over 100 firefighters at the scene were able to prevent it from spreading to lower floors and nearby buildings, the department said.
Multiple people were rescued and self-evacuated, and a total of 45 residents were displaced, but there were no injuries, the department said. Two cats were also rescued, one that was treated by medics at the scene and another cared for by Animal Control.
Evacuated residents were provided temporary shelter at the corner of Golden Gate and Jones Street aboard a Muni bus. The Red Cross and other city agencies were called in to assist the displaced residents, the department said.
The fire was contained by 5:30 a.m., and firefighters remained on the scene for several hours. The cause of the fire was not immediately known.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco firefighters to retire uniforms linked to cancer
San Francisco firefighters are finally getting the protective gear they were promised after years’ long research revealed certain chemicals used in traditional firefighter uniforms can cause cancer.
“What none of us could have known is that some of the very gear designed to protect us was quietly harming us,” said San Francisco Fire Chief Dean Crispen, who spoke alongside dozens of first responders on Thursday as he announced the city’s $3.6 million plan to provide protective equipment to all frontline firefighters by the end of the year. “This is a joyous occasion for our city.”
San Francisco Fire Chief Dean Crispen was flanked by the mayor, state and local lawmakers, and dozens of first responders on Thursday when detailing the city’s plans to provide new, non-PFAS uniforms to frontline firefighters across San Francisco.
The San Francisco fire department, the tenth largest in the nation, has already distributed the redesigned gear to about 80 of its firefighters and hopes to have all 1,100 of its new uniforms in use within the next three weeks – that’s enough protective equipment to provide one uniform to each of the city’s frontline firefighters. While city leaders hope to eventually purchase a second set of gear, San Francisco firefighters will, for now, need to wash their new gear before returning to work or continue to rely on their old uniform as a backup.
“Public safety relies on the people who stand between danger and our residents,” Mayor Lurie told the crowd during Thursday’s announcement. “Firefighter health must always be at the center of our decisions.”
San Francisco’s efforts stem from a first-in-the-nation ban that local lawmakers passed last year, which requires the city to outfit firefighters with new uniforms by July 2026. Over the years, studies have shown the jackets and pants firefighters across America have long relied on to keep safe during emergencies are made with materials proven to cause cancer.
These so-called “PFAS” materials, often referred to as ‘forever chemicals’ because of their reluctance to breakdown, have long been used to bolster the reliability of firefighter clothing by helping to repel flammable liquids and reduce temperatures, even in extreme heat. Researchers, however, have found the compounds to be harmful when absorbed through skin. While the precise level of PFAS exposure for firefighters and the associated health risks are still being studied, the compounds have been linked to cancer and other negative health effects impacting cholesterol levels and the immune system, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
PFAS aside, the inherit health risks of firefighting, including prolonged exposure to smoke and ash, led the World Health Organization to deem the occupation a “carcinogen.” Yet, some fear the very safety uniforms firefighters have come to rely on for protection could also be making them sick.
Female firefighters in San Francisco are six times more likely to develop cancer compared to the national average, according to the San Francisco Firefighters Cancer Prevention Foundation.
In San Francisco, female firefighters have a six times higher rate of breast cancer than the national average, according to the San Francisco Firefighters Cancer Prevention Foundation. More than 400 firefighters in San Francisco have been lost to cancer over the past 20 years, according to the city’s fire department.
“The cost of inaction is measured in funerals,” said Stephen Gilman, who represents the local chapter of the International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF). “The reward of action is measured in lives saved.”
The cost of inaction is measured in funerals.
Stephen Gilman, International Assoc. of Fire Fighters (IAFF)
While materials laced with PFAS have been shown to pose safety risks, so has fire gear that has been manufactured without it. Last year, the NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit reported on research from North Carolina State University that found non-PFAS fire equipment to be less breathable and more flammable than traditional uniforms made with PFAS.
“We don’t want to just trade one hazard for another,” Dr. Bryan Ormand told the Investigative Unit back in May 2024. “We’re introducing a potential hazard for flammability on the fire scene where firefighters didn’t have that before.”
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors is scheduled to vote Tuesday on a city-wide ban of what are known as ‘PFAS’ or ‘forever chemicals,’ but replacement options still aren’t widely available and those that are seem be raising new safety concerns. Senior Investigator Bigad Shaban reports.
Milliken & Company, the textile firm that made the material for San Francisco’s latest uniforms, said the new type of gear “meets or exceeds” all industry standards for “breathability and thermal protection.”
“We refused to trade one hazard for another,” Marcio Manique, senior vice president and managing director of Milliken’s apparel business, noted in a written statement.
“It meets the strictest performance standards without adding weight or compromising breathability – giving firefighters exactly what they asked for.”
We refused to trade one hazard for another
Marcio Manique, senior vice president and managing director of Milliken’s apparel business
In San Francisco, the new gear underwent a 90-day test trial with 50 of the city’s own firefighters.
“What we did was we actually went through a really comprehensive testing process,” Chief Crispen told the Investigative Unit. “It went to the lab and received testing and everything came back great, so we feel strongly about this product.”
Contact The Investigative Unit
submit tips | 1-888-996-TIPS | e-mail Bigad
San Francisco, CA
Gas explosion in San Francisco Bay Area damages homes, sends heavy smoke into air
SAN FRANCISCO — A gas explosion started a major fire in a San Francisco Bay Area neighborhood on Thursday, damaging several homes and sending heavy smoke into the air.
Local outlets said there are possible injuries from the Hayward explosion.
A spokesperson with Pacific Gas & Electric Co. said a construction crew damaged an underground gas line around 7:35 a.m. The company said it was not their workers.
Utility workers isolated the damaged line and stopped the flow of gas at 9:25 a.m., PG&E said. The explosion occurred shortly afterward.
-
Alaska6 days agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Politics1 week agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio1 week ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
Texas6 days agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
News1 week agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World1 week agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Washington3 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa5 days agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire