Connect with us

Nevada

Don’t call it a cyberattack: Nevada Gaming Control Board gives security update

Published

on

Don’t call it a cyberattack: Nevada Gaming Control Board gives security update


by Richard N. Velotta, Las Vegas Review-Journal

Credit: CC0 Public Domain

The Nevada Gaming Control Board said, Feb. 28, an investigation has confirmed that no personal information was accessed or acquired by any unauthorized persons as a result of a cybersecurity incident in late January.

But the state’s gaming industry regulator stopped short of calling the incident a cyberattack and did not indicate if investigators are seeking any criminal suspects.

Advertisement

The Control Board’s website appearance has changed since it became inaccessible in late January.

The board, on Jan. 25, issued a statement on X, formerly known as Twitter, saying it had taken measures to protect the website by taking it offline.

Wednesday’s board statement said the board used “established protocols” to prevent further damage. Specifically, the board chose to shut down the existing website and transitioned to a new website platform under the guidance of the Nevada Office of the Chief Information Officer. An investigation was conducted by the Control Board Information Technology team, the Office of the Chief Information Officer, other law enforcement agencies and external legal and forensic experts.

The board did not respond to inquiries about whether evidence was found that the incident was a cyberattack or if any suspects are being sought.

Gaming officials are sensitive to cybersecurity breaches, particularly after the state’s largest casino companies—MGM Resorts International and Caesars Entertainment Inc.—were victims of a cyberattack in late summer in 2023.

Advertisement

MGM weathered nine days of websites being down, but didn’t capitulate to ransom demands.

Caesars reportedly paid a $15 million ransomware demand, but never skipped a beat resulting from downed sites. The company has not confirmed ever paying a ransom.

The two companies ended up losing millions of dollars in lost reservations and inconvenience, but MGM said it recovered most of its money through insurance.

The Control Board website was gradually restored over about a five-day period and investigators said no personal or financial information was exposed.

The Control Board’s public-facing website provides board agendas, statistics, casino indices, regulations and biographical information about Control Board members and gaming commissioners.

Advertisement

2024 Las Vegas Review-Journal. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Citation:
Don’t call it a cyberattack: Nevada Gaming Control Board gives security update (2024, March 1)
retrieved 1 March 2024
from https://techxplore.com/news/2024-03-dont-cyberattack-nevada-gaming-board.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nevada

Globex Discovers Rare Earth Mineralisation in Nevada

Published

on

Globex Discovers Rare Earth Mineralisation in Nevada


TORONTO, Feb. 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — GLOBEX MINING ENTERPRISES INC. (GMX – Toronto Stock Exchange, G1MN – Frankfurt, Stuttgart, Berlin, Munich,  Tradegate, Lang & Schwarz, LS Exchange, TTMzero, Düsseldorf and Quotrix Düsseldorf Stock Exch anges and GLBXF – OTCQX International in the US) is pleased to announce that it has acquired by staking through its wholly owned subsidiary Globex Nevada, a contiguous block of unpatented lode mining claims in Lincoln County, southeastern Nevada, linearly 170 km northeast of Las Vegas. Simultaneously with the acquisition of the Gem Hills Property rare earths property , Globex completed a prospecting and sampling program.

Highlights of Property Sampling/Prospecting (see Exhibit 1, for property location and Exhibit 2 for sample locations):

  • Sampling returned significantly high-grade rare earth oxide (REO) values assaying between 0.28% and 5.26% TREO and averaging about 1.7% TREO containing up to 18.97% HREO and 35% Nd2O3 +Pr2O3.
  • Sampling results were characterized by high grade TREO (total rare earth oxides) and local enrichment of the (more valuable) heavy rare earth elements (HREE). Gem Hill REE mineralisation identified in trenches and sampling shows an exposed strike length of at least 90 m along a NE-orientated segment, and potential 40 metre extent to the west. and REE mineralisation is open to the south and north but is concealed under overburden.

Exhibit 1. Location map of Globex’s Gem Hills Rare Earth Elements (REE) Property.

Exhibit 1 shows the location of the Gem Hills property and the location of MP Materials Mountain Pass REE mine and the Virgin Mountain REE project (optioned from Globex to Lodestar Minerals Ltd.). Mountain Pass accounted for approximately 12% to 14% of the world’s rare earth mined output (mainly LREE). The U.S. government, primarily through the Department of Defense (DoD), provides significant support to MP Materials’ Mountain Pass rare earth mine, including a major 2025 loan for heavy rare earth separation, grants for processing upgrades, and a price-floor agreement for Nd/Pr all aimed at securing a domestic supply chain for defense and high-tech industries, reducing REE reliance on China, and boosting U.S. industrial independence.

History, Geology, Sampling by Globex

Advertisement

The property herein called the Gem Hills Project was staked to cover rare earth elements (REE) mineralisation that had been discovered in 2024 by Globex during a regional prospecting campaign. The project is located outside any known mining district. Several small historic prospects and two shallow shafts date probably back to the 1930’s to early 1940’s. These old workings explored and mined at small scale massive limonite (iron-oxide) and manganese oxides not rare earths.

In 2024 Globex had collected already 13 surface rock samples within and in the vicinity of the Gem Hills property. In late 2025 a total of 39 rock samples (34 within the property), including 17 channel samples, had been collected from seven hand dug trenches, from prospect dumps and rock outcrops.

The Gem Hills property lies at the southeastern margin of the Caliente Caldera Complex, situated in the extreme southeast of the Great Basin geological province. Felsic and intermediate calc-alkaline volcanic rocks erupted between 24 and 18 Ma from the caldera complex during the Late Oligocene until Early Miocene. In the district around the Gem Hills project appear numerous isolated (some several km across) geological windows of Lower Paleozoic carbonate-rocks surrounded by mostly extrusive volcanic rocks erupted from the Caliente Caldera. Isolated small intrusive stocks or plutons of mostly Tertiary age appear locally at the margin of the Caliente Caldera Complex.

Oldest rocks in the property area are generally thick bedded massive limestone and dolomite, probably of Devonian age. These rocks appear in an isolated irregular-shaped domain of carbonate rock measuring about 2.5 km E-W and 2 km N-S. It is surrounded by mid Tertiary volcanic rocks erupted from the Caliente Caldera. Those comprise lava flows, breccias, tuff and subvolcanic stocks/dikes of andesite & dacite, latite, quartz-latite and rhyolite. Part of the southern portion of the property is dominated by an almost rectangular-shaped SW-NE orientated intrusive stock of subvolcanic mostly porphyritic alkaline monzonite and syenite with dimensions of about 500 x 800 m.

REE mineralisation occurs along the east side of a north trending limestone/dolomite “nose” in faulted contact to felsic volcanic rocks (mainly latite). The contact dips steeply W and E and is not linear, but undulated with several indentations. Larger mineralized zones developed in these indentations or deeper embayments. Locally near the contact appear also massive limonite bodies, limonite replaces here latite breccias. These limonite pockets are short, but can approach width of up to 3-5 m. However limonite bodies do not carry any rare earth mineralization. The REE mineralisation developed directly at the brecciated/faulted contact to the Devonian limestone/dolomite, extending further away as mixed clayey breccia zone of carbonate rock and volcanic rock with lower grades, locally extending also into argillic-phyllic altered volcanic rocks. Apparently especially the carbonate fragments had been replaced by REE minerals and mostly, but not always, also by more or less abundant black manganese oxide minerals.

Advertisement

Highest grades with highest HREE (heavy rare earth elements) contents came from a mine dump derived from an about 8-10 m deep shaft and from a smaller prospect dump. Total mineralisation width could not always be exposed by the trenching due to deeper overburden, but varies between about 1.0 m and up to at least 5.0 m. Sampling & trenching indicated that mineralisation extends at least along a 90 m long NE-orientated segment, whereas mineralisation in indented zones may extend to the west into the limestone domain for up to 40 m away from this NE trending contact line limestone/dolomite to volcanic rocks. REE mineralisation is open to the south and north but is concealed under deeper overburden.

Exhibit 2. Geology of Globex Gem Hills Property REE zone that has been mapped and defined by sampling (including 17 channel samples) of historic mine dumps and 7 hand-dug trenches.

Geology of Globex Gem Hills Property REE zone

The Gem Hills REE project is characterized by high TREO (total rare earth oxides) and local enrichment of the (more valuable) heavy rare earth elements (HREE). Gem Hills mineralisation contains considerable amounts of the high-value REE from the light rare earth group (LREE) praseodymium, neodymium and from the HREE group gadolinium , terbium, dysprosium , holmium and erbium.

Furthermore, mineralisation contains abundant yttrium with up to 0.435% Y2O3 (low value in China, but at times very high prices in Europe, USA and Canada due to sanctions and restrictions).

From 34 rock samples collected within the property in autumn 2025, 18 samples returned significantly high rare earth oxide (REO) values (plus one sample collected in 2024) assaying between 0.28% and 5.26% TREO and averaging about 1.7% TREO. The share of HREO from TREO varies greatly between about 2% and up to 19% , averaging about 8%. Highest HREO share was found in prospect dump samples. The share of high-value REO (these include highly priced HREO and LREO) varies greatly between 1.5% and 39.7%, averaging about 17%. The share of the LREO Nd2O3 + Pr2O3 from TREO varies greatly between 1.0 and up to 35% averaging 13.7% and approaching a maximum combined grade of 1.14% (11.4 kg/t Nd2O3 + Pr2O3). (Note : surface rock and grab samples, by their nature, are selective samples and may not represent true underlying mineralisation.)

Advertisement

Locally some of the most expensive HREE are strongly enriched, those include Dysprosium and Terbium. Highest Dy2O3 grade was 0.09% (0.9 kg/t) and highest Tb2O3 grade was 0.016% (0.16 kg/t).

It is worth noting that the Gem Hills REE mineralisation is not associated with any radiation anomaly (essentially absence of uranium and thorium). High-grade, low-radioactivity REE deposits offer a “cleaner,” cheaper, and safer path to supplying essential REE for modern technology, making them highly valuable. However, most of these low-radioactivity REE deposits (mostly carbonatite-tied deposit type) cannot cover the required industrial demand in HREE. Gem Hills with its extremely low radiation levels (actually background levels) and relatively high share of HREE offers a unique opportunity for recovery of LREE and HREE without the environmental impact of high radioactivity REE ore.

Major mineral phases had been identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD) testing of four high-grade samples through SGS TEC Services, Lawrenceville, Georgia. The principal mineral assemblage of high-grade ore is dolomite/calcite-nacrite-gibbsite-Mn-oxides-fluorite-monazite. The REE-rich mineral paragenesis at the faulted/brecciated contact between Tertiary felsic volcanics and Paleozoic sedimentary carbonate rocks formed by hydrothermal-metasomatic carbonate replacement, probably through a complex multi-stage magmatic-hydrothermal evolution with a transition from high-temperature, near-neutral fluid transport to a low-temperature, acidic, and highly oxidative environment. Less than 10% of REE are contained in monazite, the bulk of REE might be contained in fluorite, in yet unidentified minor mineral phases (below the 2-3% detection limit of the XRD testing) or is adsorbed to nacrite and gibbsite. Gem Hills REE mineralization with its unusual mineral assemblage stands alone and appears to represent a new hydrothermal-metasomatic REE deposit type.

The Gem Hills REE property is currently being studied for future exploration programs or option.

Table 1. Selected Sample List with REO Assay Results from Gem Hills REE property

Advertisement

Selected Sample List with REO Assay Results from Gem Hills REE property

Analytical Methods

Samples were placed in labelled plastic bags, sealed with a plastic zip and shipped to American Assay Laboratories (AAL) in Sparks, Nevada, USA for preparation and geochemical analysis. AAL is an ISO 17025 certified laboratory. Samples are crushed and a 300 g subsample pulverized to >85% to -75 micron. All samples had been assayed with the IO-4AB51 method for 51 elements including all REE with 4 acid digestion (HNO3, HF, HClO4, HCl and H3BO3). 4AB is a near total digest (resistant phases e.g. corundum, ilmenite, rutile et al., are not digested). With this 4AB digest rare earth >10000 ppm will cause double fluoride precipitation (causing lower readings than real REE grades). Digest is then analyzed with ICP-OES in ppm. Typical internal standards and checks were completed by AAL during analysis. All those samples that returned >1000 ppm in any REE with the IO-4AB51 method had been re-assayed for 27 elements with method IO-NF27. In total 17 samples had been re-assayed. Samples are fused with sodium peroxide flux for total digestion. Fused sample is then dissolved and analyzed via ICP-OES in ppm.

This press release was prepared by Matthias Jurgeit, Eurogeologist under the supervision of Jack Stoch, P.Geo., CEO & Executive Chairman of Globex in his capacity as a Qualified Person (Q.P.) under NI 43-101.

We Seek Safe Harbour. Foreign Private Issuer 12g3 – 2(b)
  CUSIP Number 379900 50 9
LEI 529900XYUKGG3LF9PY95
For further information, contact:
Jack Stoch, P.Geo., Acc.Dir.
CEO & Executive Chairman
Globex Mining Enterprises Inc.
Suite 219, 120 Carlton Street
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5A 4K2
Tel.: 819.797.5242
Fax: 819.797.1470
info@globexmining.com
www.globexmining.com
   

Forward-Looking Statements: Except for historical information, this news release may contain certain “forward-looking statements”. These statements may involve a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity and performance to be materially different from the expectations and projections of Globex Mining Enterprises Inc. (“Globex”). No assurance can be given that any events anticipated by the forward-looking information will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what benefits Globex will derive therefrom. A more detailed discussion of the risks is available in the “Annual Information Form” filed by Globex on SEDARplus.ca

Photos accompanying this announcement are available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/cf9a242f-f678-404c-a96e-64459073472a
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/cb34f784-bf75-4a1b-82eb-8f5a17285045
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/3d03367c-3a8c-4a09-9cfd-1ffb94e6ba1d

Advertisement

Primary Logo



Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

These were the biggest cities in Nevada 150 years ago

Published

on

These were the biggest cities in Nevada 150 years ago


After the completion of the 1860 census and the election of President Abraham Lincoln, America imploded. Eleven southern states seceded from the Union in 1861, instigating four bloody years of the Civil War and fundamentally altering the social history of the U.S. The estimates of deaths caused by the Civil War begin around 600,000, but some claim as many as 750,000 individuals died throughout the conflict.

With so many families looking for a new start after combat finally ended and approximately 4 million Black Americans emancipated from slavery, it was time for many Americans to look for a new home to put down roots. The obvious choice for many was to move west, where there was more land to buy, settle, and cultivate. Many traveled by covered wagon, spending months on the dusty trail. Others who could afford better accommodations took a 25-day ride by stagecoach. All of them picked new cities and towns to make their homes, spreading the U.S. population more evenly across different states and territories.

On May 10, 1869, the first transcontinental railroad route across the United States was completed, ushering in a new era of transportation. The project was completed ahead of schedule and under budget, though with the loss of many lives, including those of the many Irish and Chinese immigrants hired to work 12-hour days in the hot western sun. Riding by steam engine, passengers could cross the entire country in four days, enabling waves of Americans and immigrants to quickly occupy land that would otherwise take months to settle.

The years of Civil War reconstruction, coupled with wagon, stagecoach, and railroad passengers finding new lives across the U.S., made the urban development reflected in the 1870 census incredibly interesting. Stacker compiled a list of the biggest cities in Nevada from 150 years ago using data from the U.S. Census Bureau. By transcribing Table XXV of the Ninth Census of the U.S. it’s easy to explore what the urban landscape looked like less than a decade after the end of the Civil War as America healed and grew.

Advertisement

The largest city in Nevada ranked #297 among all cities nationwide in 1870. Keep reading to find out more about the historic metropolitan landscape in your home state or check out the data on your own on our site, GitHub, or data.world.

Waiters and waitresses pose for a group picture
Bettmann // Getty Images

#4. Carson City, Ormsby County

– Total population: 3,042 (#1,434 nationwide)

—- Male population: 2,313

—- Female population: 729

—- Child population, ages 5-18: 408

Horse and wagon outside general storeHorse and wagon outside general store
Minnesota Historical Society/Corbis via Getty Images

#3. Hamilton, White Pine County

– Total population: 3,913 (#845 nationwide)

—- Male population: 3,339

Advertisement

—- Female population: 574

—- Child population, ages 5-18: 296

Group of young women out for a trip in a horse drawn SurreyGroup of young women out for a trip in a horse drawn Surrey
Transcendental Graphics // Getty Images

#2. Gold Hill, Storey County

– Total population: 4,311 (#705 nationwide)

—- Male population: 3,139

—- Female population: 1,172

—- Child population, ages 5-18: 541

Advertisement
Man standing in door of ice cream parlorMan standing in door of ice cream parlor
Minnesota Historical Society/Corbis via Getty Images

#1. Virginia, Storey County

– Total population: 7,048 (#297 nationwide)

—- Male population: 4,725

—- Female population: 2,323

—- Child population, ages 5-18: 1,054



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Reno Arch tradition began 100 years ago this year

Published

on

Reno Arch tradition began 100 years ago this year


A version of this article originally published on Oct. 27, 2016.

Reno’s most photographed landmark, the Reno Arch, turned 90 last week. But not the kitschy, ’80s-tastic version now on Virginia Street. And not the one before that, now living in Willits, California. It is the modestly lit one, previously known as the Exposition Arch now on Lake Street, that marked the milestone.

It’s worth pausing for a moment to note that, yes, Reno raised three arches in less than 100 years. New metal sheathing and lights will soon update the current Reno Arch, too. Does that count as a new one? No. But maybe we can call it Reno Arch version 3.1.

Advertisement

As with most else in Reno, when people grew tired of one arch, another was built anew. The current arch was built hoping it might inject new life into a flagging downtown, and tourists still flock to it for photo opportunities.

In a city that’s seen so many newcomers, it’s worth revisiting the sometimes-ridiculous history of our iconic arches that welcome all to the Biggest Little City in the World.

Arch No. 1: Party like it’s 1926

In 1926, the Lincoln Highway and Victory Highway converged to create the current Highway 40. Reno became an important stop on the connection between East and West. So naturally, there needed to be an arch commemorating Nevada’s 1927 Transcontinental Highways Exposition.

The arch was constructed in San Francisco and shipped over the mountains to be erected on Virginia Street and Commercial Row.

Advertisement

At the time, it was a huge deal and an impressive arch. Marvin Branch, the sign maker’s foreman, said he built many arches but this one was “by far the most elaborate he has ever put up” because of its size and number of lights, according to an Oct. 20, 1926, article in the Nevada State Journal.

The arch ceremony brought in numerous politicians both state and national, but it also brought more than 1,500 Shriners from the Islam Temple of the Shrine in San Francisco. They were coming to Reno for their own event, but joined the festivities and provided a 150-foot-long illuminated dragon, dancers and several bands. To top it all off, the dedication coincided with the University of Nevada’s homecoming day.

Needless to say, the arch dedication turned into a huge series of parades and parties.

In fact, someone from Iowa wrote an epic account of the night in a letter to the Nevada State Journal almost 40 years later:

Advertisement
  • “The party lasted three days and three nights.
  • $30,000 worth of whiskey was consumed, all of it supplied free to the revelers
  • A Chief Wovoka of Pyramid Lake Tribe had several hundred of his braves performing ceremonial dances
  • Reno’s restaurant owners fed the crowd breakfast, lunch and dinner for three days running, absorbing the expense themselves
  • In addition to the better known movie stars of the era on hand, there were several hundred others of lesser stature who came in on a train chartered by Death Valley Scott.”

A reporter at the time could not corroborate this accounting. But he also could not deny it.

“I am at a loss to explain, if all this is accurate, just how the newspaper reporters of the day managed to miss it,” Frank Johnson wrote in 1964. “Even presuming they took part too freely in the $30,000 worth of free whiskey, it seems reasonable to assume at least ONE dedicated soul would have pulled himself together long enough to whip out a paragraph or two of grateful prose.

“On the other hand, if the description is not accurate, I am hard put to figure out why a gentleman in Iowa would bother to compile a set of circumstance which COULD fit in with Nevada’s background and mail it to the editor.”

Also strange was the fact that the Reno Evening Gazette published daily updates about the arch for weeks leading to its construction, then suddenly stopped writing anything about it for two days after the supposed parades and parties.

Perhaps the reporters were too hungover?

Gateway to the city

After the highway exposition, the Reno City Council decided to keep the arch as the city gateway. But no longer needing the exposition title, Mayor E. E. Roberts asked the city for a slogan.

Advertisement

Not being happy with any local ideas, he started a larger contest. G. A. Burns of Sacramento won the slogan contest in 1929 with his submission of “The Biggest Little City in the World.” He was awarded $100, which he donated to a Reno charity.

Interestingly, the slogan had already been in use for years. The first printed version of the slogan appeared in 1910 on flyers made for the Johnson-Jeffries boxing match.

Here are some of the non-winning slogans Reno could’ve been stuck with for eternity:

  • Reno, a City You’ll Like
  • Reno, the Best Out West
  • East or West Reno Serves Best
  • Reno, the West’s Highest Assay
  • Reno, Biggest Little Town on Earth
  • In Progressive Reno, Loiter, Linger, Locate

Arch No. 2: The centennial span

In 1963, casino managers from the Horseshoe Club, Nevada Club, Club Primadonna, Colony Club and Poor Pete’s wanted to replace the first arch with a new one to commemorate Washoe County and Nevada’s 100th birthday.

It was dedicated on New Year’s Eve. Then-Mayor Hugo Quilici pulled a fake slot machine arm to activate all the fireworks, balloons and the neon lights on the new arch.

As with the current arch, this one too, represented hope for Reno’s future vitality.

Advertisement

“It symbolized a new vitality in the community and in the downtown area,” Jud Allen, manager of the Reno Chamber of Commerce, was quoted in a 1964 Reno Evening Gazette article. “There has been so much new growth this year: new construction, facelifting and the new arch emphasizes this.”

Meanwhile, the old arch was moved to Idlewild Park to live out its days as a monument to old Reno. But six years later, a street-widening project forced it to move to Paradise Park in Sparks. And in 1988, it was taken down due to extreme metal fatigue, public safety and the high cost of repairs.

Arch No. 3: A New Hope

By the 1980s, the second arch was covered in pigeon droppings and “had lost its place as a meaningful symbol or centerpiece,” according to an article by Warren Lerude, former Reno Gazette Journal publisher.

The Biggest Little City Committee formed and raised funds for the current Reno Arch to replace the second arch. They also offered the original arch to the Smithsonian Institute.

Advertisement

“If they take it, I’ve got some historic old tires and coffee cans they ought to leap at,” Mark Crossman wrote to Reno Gazette Journal columnist Cory Farley in 1987. “Real slices of Americana.”

The Smithsonian Institute never replied. Reno moved on.

“On Aug. 8, 1987, 20,000 people gathered on Virginia Street,” Lerude wrote. “Dramatically, casino lights were turned off and a switch was thrown. Reno’s new arch announced its heritage and future simultaneously in a burst of light and color. The crowd roared.”

A procession of classic cars immediately paraded underneath it for the opening of Hot August Nights. And the arch was assigned an address: 255½ N. Virginia St.

Advertisement

Back in the public works yard, two other symbols of Reno’s future withered away.

Later that year, Lonnie Hammargren, former lieutenant governor of Nevada and guest star on “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous” TV show, offered to buy the first arch for $1,000. He wanted it for his personal collection in Las Vegas and planned to install it in the backyard of one of his houses.

The Reno City Council put him off in hopes they could keep it in Reno.

A Reno businessman, Steven Mack, also offered $1,000 for the arch. His plans did not involve putting it in his backyard, but he presented no other specific plans to the council other than keeping it in Reno.

Advertisement

The council decided to put the arch up for bid for 30 days in case a local nonprofit or government entity would offer a better plan. No one bid. Both arches sat for another two years without attention from anyone until Willits decided it needed an arch.

Arch No. 2 (again): Gateway to the Redwoods

“My father told me when I was a little kid that Willits was the gateway to the Redwoods; the heart of Mendocino County,” resident Dusty Whitney told the RGJ. “And I was talking to someone about that on Main Street one day and the guy said, ‘Do you know the old Reno Arch is coming down, how about that?’ and I said, ‘Gee, how about that.’ “

Whitney wanted an arch for Willits. But unlike Hammargren and Mack, Whitney preferred the ’60s look of the second arch.

“I couldn’t think of a more wonderful greeting to people coming through our community other than this arch,” he said. 

Advertisement

Whitney wrote to the Reno City Council. He wanted a gateway to represent Willits’ position as entrance to the Redwood Forest, heart of Mendocino County and home to Frontier Days rodeo.

“I remember getting up at 5 a.m. to go to the Reno City Council meeting,” Whitney said. “That was a full-day situation. I remember the (Nevada Heritage) said not to let the arch go.”

The Nevada Heritage preservation group had made a last-minute $2,000 offer on the arch, but like the others before, had no specific plans for refurbishing or installing it somewhere.

The city attorney also said city property could not be disposed of by selling to private interests. Instead, cities must create an agreement to loan property to another public agency for public use.

That’s right, Willits has been “borrowing” the arch for 26 years.

Advertisement

The City Council voted to give the arch to Willits, with then-Mayor Pete Sferrazza voting nay.

“I suppose they could’ve put that one on Center Street, but the (original arch) was going to ruins,” Sferrazza told the RGJ. “We could’ve put that one up too and had three of them.”

Whitney and his team went to the public works yard and took Arch Two back that same day.

“When I first laid eyes on it, it was under three feet of snow in the city yard,” Whitney said. “It was taken apart and piled there. But I had seen old postcards so I knew what it looked like.”

Advertisement

When he returned home with the arch in tow, he realized his original plan to put it on a side street wasn’t grand enough. Instead, the second Reno Arch, now Willits Arch, belonged on Highway 101. But that created big problems: It was too small to span the road, it needed serious repairs, it needed to meet Cal-Trans standards and needed a new face.

It took Whitney five years to erect the Willits Arch. Between 1990 and 1995, he gathered the support of engineers, designers, Cal-Trans and numerous others who donated their time and skills to lengthen the arch, earthquake-proof it, design a modest face and finally stand it up over a state highway.

Many people spoke out against the Willits Arch before seeing it. They said a garish piece of Reno’s leftover glitz should not be erected in their fair city, according to 1995 articles in the Ukiah Daily Journal. The publisher of the Press Democrat was particularly scathing. Until she saw the arch.

“I have a 3-by-4-inch framed ad from the Press Democrat apologizing for their lack of vision on how this thing came out,” Whitney said. “How many times does a newspaper put out an ad thanking someone for their vision and admitting they’re wrong?”

What about the original arch?

Advertisement

The original Exposition Arch was getting a new life, too.

In 1994, a film company restored it for a four-day movie shoot on Fourth Street. Suddenly, Reno residents wanted their original arch back. The Holiday Hotel and city of Reno paid to restore and reinstall it on Lake Street in hopes it might draw tourists to the National Automobile Museum.

And so by the end of 1995, all three of Reno’s arches stood tall, proudly proclaiming “Reno, The Biggest Little City in the World” — oh, and “Willits, Gateway to the Redwoods, Heart of Mendocino County.”

Postscript: In 2018, the ‘80s-tastic third arch was refurbished, replacing the gold pillars and red neon with a more Nevada-appropriate silver and blue.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending