Massachusetts
Massachusetts voters to ponder questions ranging from magic mushrooms to rideshare drivers
Ballot initiatives could be resolved before November election if lawmakers act on proposals, pass legislation by May. Otherwise, it will be a scramble for almost 13,000 additional signatures by July
BOSTON – At one point, it seemed as if Massachusetts voters would face a bumper crop of ballot questions to ponder and decide this election cycle. But what was once a list of 45 proposals has declined to just 10, with five of them different versions of the same query.
“At this point, all the questions are before the state Legislature,” said Debra O’Malley, a spokeswoman for Secretary William Galvin.
Galvin’s office oversees and regulates statewide elections in Massachusetts, including elections to state and federal office, governor’s council, county commissioners, district attorney, clerk of the courts and registrar of deeds. Only municipal elections are not regulated through Galvin’s office.
Community organizers, politicians and even corporate figures flooded the Attorney General last year with a list of 45 initiatives they sought to have included statewide on the November ballot. They filed the paperwork, hit the streets and set about to collect signatures, each belonging to a registered voter.
What is the process for getting questions on ballot?
The first step in proposing a new law is to write it. The second step: Get at least 10 signatures from registered voters. These are submitted, along with the proposed law, to the office of the Attorney General by the first Wednesday in August. The AG reviews the language to determine if it is an “acceptable subject for an initiative.” If it is considered acceptable, the AG writes a “fair and concise” summary of the issue and returns it to the individual or group proposing the question.
The group then presents the packet to the Secretary of the Commonwealth. That office prints the summary and the petitioners then hit the streets to collect the signatures needed to qualify for inclusion on the ballot: 3% of the voter turnout in the preceding gubernatorial elections. This year, that’s 74,574 signatures of registered voters.
And the signers cannot all be from the same town or even the same county. Regulations stipulate that only 25% of signatures can be from the same county.
Once Galvin’s office certifies the signatures, all proposals are submitted to the Legislature for review and action.
When does Legislature get into the act?
Lawmakers can pass the initiative by April 30, pass legislation pertaining to a question or proposal or sit on their hands. A rarely used move allows the Legislature to formulate its own proposal to include on the ballot as an alternative choice.
If the Legislature does not act on the proposal, the question can be placed on the ballot once proponents have collected an additional 12,429 certified signatures, no more than 25% collected from one county.
This year, because of the number of proposed ballot questions, 10 in total, lawmakers have opted to create a special commission to review them.
In a statement from the offices of Senate President Karen Spilka, D-Ashland, and House Speaker Ronald Mariano, D-Quincy, both bodies have agreed to the creation of a special commission to “review the initiatives.”
“The State Constitution tasks the Legislature with considering each initiative petition, and with giving interested parties the ability to provide feedback on the policy changes being sought at the ballot box,” according to the release. “Given the number of questions that were submitted this session, including competing versions of the same question, the House and Senate will act to establish a special joint committee.”
The body will be “especially equipped to tackle the unique challenges presented by the legal and policy intricacies of the questions this year. The Legislature looks forward to a fair, balanced and informed public process for the consideration of all initiative petitions.”
One group, backed by several corporate entities, that is seeking to have app-based rideshare drivers classified as independent contractors rather than employees filed nine different version of their proposal. Four of those versions have made it to Galvin’s desk.
The proposal would define and regulate the relationship between network companies Uber, Lyft, Instacart and others, and their app-based drivers. The corporate-backed proposal would establish app-based drivers as independent contractors, not employees, and the companies that control the apps would not be their employers (90,112 certified signatures).
A competing question would create a pathway for app share drivers to form a union and bargain as a collective (83,788 certified signatures).
What are other proposed questions?
Other questions that could make it to the ballot in November:
A proposal to allow the state auditor to audit the Legislature (94,404 certified signatures collected).
A proposal that makes school districts responsible for certifying that high school students have mastered the “skills, competencies and knowledge” of state standards for MCAS graduation requirements (101,511 certified signatures). The measure would replace MCAS testing with local certification.
A proposal to pay tipped workers the state’s full minimum wage, $15 an hour (84,804 certified signatures collected).
A petition for the regulation and taxation of psychedelic, natural plant-based medicines (92,277 certified signatures).
Lawmakers have filed legislation in support of some of these proposals and in opposition to others. Sen. Patricia Jehlen, D-Somerville filed a bill to increase tipped workers to the prevailing minimum wage in Massachusetts over the course of several years.
And several bills filed in both the Senate and House would establish a clear relationship between rideshare drivers and the companies that control the applications the drivers use to obtain jobs.
The proposal to regulate and tax natural plant medicine in Massachusetts would establish a special commission, similar to the Cannabis Control Commission, to oversee the business of administration and use of psychedelics and natural medicines.
Currently, small businesses in certain communities offer therapy with psychedelics to treat substance use disorders, PTSD and other mental health issues for minimum amounts of money. Jehlen has filed legislation that would decriminalize the possession and use of magic mushrooms for anyone over 18 and allow for sharing the substances for no financial gain.
Now it’s up to the Legislature to decide whether it wants to decide the questions or leave them up to the voters.
Massachusetts
New Bedford MS-13 Member, Illegal Alien Pleads Guilty to Role in Brutal Murders In Massachusetts, Virginia
Frankli
Massachusetts
Police shoot and kill man armed with knife in Lexington, DA says
Police shot and killed a man who officials say rushed officers with a knife during a call in Lexington, Massachusetts, on Saturday.
Middlesex County District Attorney Marian Ryan said the situation started around 1:40 p.m. when Lexington police received a 911 call from a resident of Mason Street reporting that his son had injured himself with a knife.
Officers from the Lexington Police Department and officers from the Northeastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council (NEMLEC), who were already in town for Patriots’ Day events, responded to the call.
Police were able to escort two other residents out of the home, initially leaving a 26-year-old man inside. According to Ryan, while officers were setting up outside, the man ran out of the home and approached officers with a large kitchen knife.
She added that police tried twice to use non-lethal force, but it was not effective in stopping him. The man was shot by a Wilmington police officer who is a member of NEMLEC. The man was pronounced dead on scene and the officer who fired that shot was taken to a local hospital as a precaution.
The man’s name has not been released.
Ryan said typically in a call like this where someone was described as harming themselves, officers would first try to separate anyone else to keep them out of danger, which was done, and then standard practice would be to try to wait outside.
“It would be their practice to just wait for the person to come out. In the terrible circumstances of today, he suddenly rushed the officers, still clutching the knife,” Ryan said.
The investigation is still in the preliminary stages and more information is expected in time. Ryan said her office will request a formal inquest from the court to review whether any criminal conduct has occurred, which is the standard process.
This happened around the same time as the annual Patriots’ Day Parade, and just hours after a reenactment of the Battle of Lexington, which drew large crowds to town.
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Massachusetts
‘An impossible choice’: With little federal help to combat rising costs, Head Start looks to Massachusetts for more help – The Boston Globe
In Massachusetts, roughly 1,300 slots for children across Head Start’s 28 agencies have been eliminated in the last three years because federal funding has plateaued over that time, while the cost of running the program continues to rise, according to the Massachusetts Head Start Association. Nationally, Head Start enrollment dropped from 1.1 million kids in 2013 to around 785,000 in 2022, according to research by the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
“If they didn’t get into a Head Start program, they would be sitting at home,” said Brittany Acosta, a Head Start parent in Dorchester.
It’s teachers are drastically underpaid, and there’s a serious need for a rainy day-type fund should the federal government shut down again, the association says. As they’ve done in years past, state lawmakers have offered to provide financial relief, but the Massachusetts Head Start Association’s request for 3 percent above the amount it received last year, an additional $4.6 million to help its staff keep up with the state’s rising cost of living, so far has not been allocated.

Last year, President Trump’s leaked budget proposal revealed he considered eliminating Head Start entirely. Then, in the summer, he cut off Head Start enrollment for immigrants without legal status. And during the fall’s government shutdown, four Head Start centers in Massachusetts closed because they couldn’t access their funding.
Trump’s latest budget proposal shows a fourth year without increasing funding for the program, which was established in the mid-1960s.
Michelle Haimowitz, executive director of the Massachusetts Head Start Association, said the program doesn’t want to eliminate more child slots than it already has, but paying teachers a competitive salary is equally important in order to keep them from leaving for higher paying jobs. Head Start teachers make under $50,000 annually compared to over $85,000 for the average Massachusetts kindergarten teacher.
“It’s an impossible choice,” Haimowitz said. “When we reduce the size of our programs, we’re not reducing the size of the need.”

Massachusetts is one of few states that supplements federal funding for Head Start, and last year it increased the program’s state grant from $5 million to $20 million, adding to the $189 million in federal aid it receives in this state.
“We can’t run a program without giving staff a raise for three years,” Haimowitz said. “Our next fight now is not just for survival, but it’s for thriving and growth.”
The Massachusetts House Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday released its budget, which doesn’t grant Head Start’s request of a 3 percent boost. But state Representative Christopher Worrell filed an amendment for additional funding. Worrell, whose district covers parts of Dorchester and Roxbury, said he loves Head Start’s embrace of culture, recalling one visit to a center where he could smell staff cooking stew chicken, a traditional Caribbean dish.
“I’ve been to dozens of schools throughout the district, and you don’t get that home-cooked meal,” Worrell said. “[The state is] stepping up and doing the best we can with what we have.”


At the Action for Boston Community Development’s Head Start and Early Head Start center in Dorchester, the children of Classroom 7 arrived one Monday morning and dove into bins of magnetic tiles before their teachers, Paola Polanco and Leolina Rasundar Chinnappa, served breakfast. Acosta dropped off her 4-year-old daughter, Violeta, before reporting to her teaching position at the center, where several other Head Start parents also work.
“It’s important for all Head Start parents to have the opportunity to give their child an experience in a learning environment before they actually start kindergarten,” Acosta said.
Beyond providing early education and care to children of low-income families, from birth to age 5, the program helps them access other resources, including mental health services, SNAP benefits, homelessness assistance, and employment opportunities.
It also serves as daycare for parents who might not be able to afford it, while they’re at work.
Research has shown the importance of preschool in a child’s development with one 2023 study, focused on Boston public preschools, finding that it improves student behavior and increases the likelihood of high school graduation and college enrollment.

For Rickencia Clerveaux and Christopher Mclean, the Dorchester Head Start center is the only place they feel comfortable sending their 3-year-old son, Shontz, who is on the autism spectrum. Shontz’s stimming — repetitive movements that stimulate the senses — has reduced, and his speech has improved since he joined the center in 2024, Clerveaux said.

His parents say he’s also come out of his shell. Mclean now drops his son off and gets a simple “bye” as Shontz joins his classmates, he said.
He and Clerveaux said they appreciate the specialized attention Shontz can receive from teachers, such as when staff identified that Shontz might have hearing issues. His parents were able to follow up with their doctor and get Shontz to have surgery to improve his hearing.
“It’s a safe net for parents,” Clerveaux said. “There’s so many ways that him being here helps him grow better.”
Without Head Start, Clerveaux said a lot of pressure would be put on parents to find care for their children, “knowing that they’re already struggling or not getting the ends to meet.”
“That’s a burden for everybody in the community,” she said. “If there’s no funding, there’s no daycare and parents cannot work.”

Lauren Albano can be reached at lauren.albano@globe.com. Follow her on X @LaurenAlbano_.
-
Detroit, MI1 hour agoGame 21: Tigers at Red Sox, Garrett Crochet battles both Detroit and the weather
-
San Francisco, CA1 hour agoWhy do gray whales keep dying in San Francisco’s waters?
-
Dallas, TX1 hour agoDallas Mavericks Owners Might Be Making Big Mistake in Search for New GM
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoDefense dominates, Mensah flashes in Miami’s spring game – The Miami Hurricane
-
Boston, MA2 hours ago
A crowd scientist is helping the Boston Marathon manage a growing field of 30,000-plus runners
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoDenver Nuggets Altitude broadcasts now being offered in Spanish for first time ever
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoNeed to shred? Free drive-up/ride-up shredding Wednesday at Village Green West Seattle
-
San Diego, CA2 hours agoGame 21: San Diego Padres at Los Angeles Angels