Connect with us

Movie Reviews

A Different Man Film Review: Sebastian Stan Stuns

Published

on

A Different Man Film Review: Sebastian Stan Stuns

A Different Man is a strikingly original film with a career redefining performance from Sebastian Stan that will unsettle audiences.


A Different Man is one of the darkest satires I’ve ever seen. Edward (Sebastian Stan) has a highly troubled life, not only because of his deeply disfigured face, but also due to the way he carries himself. When he participates in an experimental drug trial that drastically changes his appearance, he finally starts to live the life he’s always wanted. This dream life quickly turns into a nightmare when a play sparks Edward’s desires to change and he becomes obsessed with trying to reclaim what he’s lost.

From the very start of A Different Man, I knew that I was witnessing a totally unique artistic vision. Writer and director Aaron Schimberg has control of every frame, and even if the story isn’t for everyone, the high quality production value of this film is undeniable. The framing in particular is always fascinating, and performance driven. Schimberg always knows when to have an actor’s face fill up the whole frame and it feels as if he has control over every single emotion the audience feels during the runtime. 

The beginning of A Different Man, before Edward’s transformation, feels very different than what follows. His life is riddled with anxiety, and the audience feels every bit of that. It feels like a more toned down version of the first act of Beau is Afraid, where everything seems to be going wrong. Every sudden noise is jarring, and you feel the discomfort that Edward has because he looks different. At this time, Stan’s makeup is some of the best that will come all year. We have seen actors buried under makeup plenty of times before, but I’ve never seen makeup like this where I questioned if there were two different actors playing Edward. 

A Different Man’s satire looks at self confidence and the obsession we all have with how others perceive us. Because of Edward’s facial disfigurement, he carries himself in a victimized manner. This is completely understandable because while we never see anyone directly treat him poorly, he is clearly seen as other. Who wouldn’t want to change that if given the opportunity? The tragic and painfully funny part of this story kicks in when we get to witness how much Edward’s quality of life improves after his procedure.

Advertisement
Sebastian Stan looks scared in A Different Man by Aaron Schimberg, reviewed on Loud and Clear Reviews
Sebastian Stan in A Different Man by Aaron Schimberg, an official selection of the Premieres program at the 2024 Sundance Film Festival. A24, Courtesy of Sundance Institute.

While it’s nice to see someone who was in such emotional turmoil striving with his new life, this joy becomes a tough watch when Oswald (Adam Pearson) enters his life. Oswald also has a facial disfigurement, but is a lot more confident in his own skin. Both Edward and the audience start to realize how different society treats Oswald because of this confidence, especially compared to the way Edward was initially treated. This knowledge and unrealized potential is what starts to lead him to a downward spiral and creates a truly unpredictable ending

The main highlight of A Different Man are the three core performances. Sebastian Stan gives a performance I was unaware he was capable of, especially on a physical level. By the end of the film, Edward has to go through so much, and without an actor that is so in command of his craft. There are so big swings A Different Man takes, and with Stan didn’t make his portrayal so believable, none of the satire would pay off. Even though I saw this film at the very start of 2024, I would be shocked if he didn’t receive some accolades during the 2025 awards season. 

Supporting players Renate Reinsve and Adam Pearson are quite phenomenal here as well as Ingrid and Oswald. Reinsve feels like she is giving two different performances from where we first meet her and where her arc ends up. Ingrid is an incredibly flawed person whose morals are never known and Reinsve makes every scene she’s in a facianiting watch. Pearson is incredibly charismatic and a pure scene stealer. In the scenes that Edward and Oswald share, Edward is in a lot of emotional pain, but Pearson’s star power is so alluring that just like everyone in the film, you’re too drawn to Oswald to care. 

Almost any criticism I had with A Different Man, the film addressed in some way. For example, the way that disabled people are represented in this film could be perceived as offensive, especially since Sebastian Stan is playing a member of that community. However, Ingrid and Edward eventually have a conversation about this very topic when discussing a play she is writing. I constantly felt like this film was always one step ahead of my thoughts, and I was always impressed with everything happening on screen. 

Overall, A Different Man is an original achievement that I absolutely adored. It is certainly not for everyone, with some of the disturbing imagery, but I was always immensely entertained. The makeup work, direction and score will be some of the best works I’ll see all year and the satire brings up some interesting ideas that I can’t wait to discuss with others.  A24 has another hit on their hands with A Different Man, and hopefully a bold film like this will find its audience and become the classic I believe it is.


A Different Man premiered at the 2024 Sundance Film Festival and will be distributed by A24. Read all our Sundance reviews!

Advertisement

Fresh (Hulu) Film Review – Loud And Clear Reviews

Review: Sebastian Stan shines as a flesh-eating psychopath in Fresh (Hulu), a horror/thriller with a great premise but many familiar tropes.

Image credit for the header: Sebastian Stan’s Instagram.

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: ‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ – Catholic Review

Published

on

Movie Review: ‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ – Catholic Review

NEW YORK (OSV News) – “Avatar: Fire and Ash” (20th Century), the third film in the always visually rich franchise that got its start in 2009, brings forward thematic elements that had previously been kept in the background and that viewers of faith will find it impossible to accept and difficult to dismiss. As a result, it requires careful evaluation by mature movie fans.

Against the recurring background of the fictional moon Pandora, the saga of the family whose fortunes were chronicled in the earlier chapters continues. The clan consists of dad Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and his wife Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña) as well as their three surviving children, teens Lo’ak (Britain Dalton) and Kiri (Sigourney Weaver) and tyke Tuk (Trinity Jo-Li Bliss).

Rounding out the household is Jake and Neytiri’s adolescent adopted son, Spider (Jack Champion).

As veterans of the earlier outings will know, Jake was originally a human and a Marine. But, via an avatar, he eventually embraced the identity of Neytiri’s Pandoran tribe, the Na’vi. While their biological kids are to all appearances Na’vi — a towering race with blue skins and tails — Spider is human and requires a breathing mask to survive on Pandora.

Lo’ak is guilt-ridden over his role in the death of his older brother, Neteyam (Jamie Flatters), and wants to redeem himself by proving his worth as a warrior. Kiri is frustrated that, despite her evident spiritual gifts, she’s unable to connect with Eywa, the mother goddess the Na’vi worship.

Advertisement

For his part, Jake is worried about Spider’s future — Neteyam’s death has left the still-grieving Neytiri with a hatred of the “Sky people,” as Earthlings are known on Pandora. He also has to contend with the ongoing threat posed by his potentially deadly rivalry with his former Marine comrade, Col. Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang), who is also Spider’s estranged father.

As if all that weren’t enough, a further challenge arises when the Metkayina, the sea-oriented Pandorans with whom Jake et al. have taken refuge, are attacked by the fierce fire-centric Mangkwan, led by Varang (Oona Chaplin), a malevolent sorceress. A three hour-plus running time is required to tie up these varied strands.

Along the way, the religion adhered to by the main characters becomes more prominent than in previous installments. Thus Eywa is both present on screen and active in the plot. Additionally, Kiri is revealed to have been the product of a virginal conception.

Director and co-writer (with Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver) James Cameron’s extension of his blockbuster series, accordingly, not only includes material uncomfortable at best for Christians but also seems incongruent, overall, with monotheistic belief. Even well-catechized grown-ups, therefore, should approach this sprawling addition to Cameron’s epic with caution.

The film contains nonscriptural beliefs and practices, constant stylized but often intense combat violence with brief gore, scenes of torture, narcotics use, partial nudity, a couple of mild oaths, at least one rough term, numerous crude and a handful of crass expressions and an obscene gesture. The OSV News classification is L — limited adult audience, films whose problematic content many adults would find troubling. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG-13 — parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.

Advertisement

Read More Movie & TV Reviews

Copyright © 2025 OSV News

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Gurram Paapi Reddy’ movie review: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah’s con comedy is hilarious yet overcooked

Published

on

‘Gurram Paapi Reddy’ movie review: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah’s con comedy is hilarious yet overcooked

If this week’s Telugu release Gurram Paapi Reddy were a human, it would most likely be a teenager. It bursts with energy, overflowing with ideas and wearing its unabashed enthusiasm like a badge of honour. The audience too might end up surrendering to its infectious energy. Yet, like a distracted teenager, the film also gets so enamoured by its very idea that it loses control and does not know where to stop.

The vibe is eerily similar to Jathi Ratnalu early on. Again, Brahmanandam (as Vaidyanathan), is a judge. Faria Abdullah, the actress in the former film, is the only female presence in the lead lineup here. The other oddball male characters — Gurram Paapi Reddy (Naresh Agastya), Chilipi (Vamshidhar Goud), Goyyi (Jeevan Kumar) and Military (Rajkumar Kasireddy) — are the not-so-smart ones who get entangled in a mess.

The similarities end there. Brahmanandam, who is in terrific form, sets the tone of the comedy, doling out harsh punishments to petty criminals, not for their crimes, but for their sheer stupidity in getting caught. Gurram, Chilipi, Goyyi and Military are the victims who reunite after their jail term. This time, they are joined by Soudamini (Faria).

Gurram Paapi Reddy (Telugu)

Director: Murali Manohar

Cast: Naresh Agastya, Faria Abdullah, Brahmanandam, Yogi Babu

Advertisement

Runtime: 160 minutes

Storyline: A gang of four ex-convicts swap dead bodies for easy money and land in a ‘royal’ mess.

While their earlier heist at a jewellery store goes terribly wrong, the new plan is strangely simple. The four men need to swap a dead body from Srisailam with another body in a graveyard in Hyderabad for a meagre sum. While they execute it, albeit with difficulty, it gets messy when the motive behind the swap comes to the fore, dating back to a royal gift from the pre-Independence era.

The key conflict is established prior to the intermission, but newer problems surface later. Though the story idea is deceptively straightforward, the director builds many layers to the fun quotient and it’s evident that he treats comedy like serious business.

The actors react to the situations without trying too hard to impress. The scenes are not only thematically funny, but also packed with outrageously hilarious one-liners. Every time one feels the film’s trajectory is sorted, there is a surprise. The screenplay is busy with backstories and subplots.

Advertisement

The second hour could have benefited from some economy in writing. Past connections are strung together, newer characters and their complexities are introduced, there are backup plans, flashbacks and a song is thrown into the mix. Thankfully, the humour quotient remains unaffected. Some breather would have been welcome.

The subplots involving Sangi Reddy, particularly the courtroom proceedings, and Markandeya Raju’s son crowd the screenplay, leaving the viewers with too many dots to connect. It’s inevitable for some restlessness to creep in towards the final 45 minutes — a stretch packed with several events and coincidences. A clever climax salvages the film.

Gurram Paapi Reddy is aware of the crucial balance between the goofiness of its characters and the seriousness of the plot. Too many characters and a packed, expansive narrative make the film exhausting, given its 160-minute runtime.

Naresh Agastya, Vamshidhar Goud, Faria Abdullah, Jeevan Kumar and Rajkumar Kasireddy share wonderful on-screen camaraderie and get ample scope to shine individually too. Yogi Babu, as a convict with night-blindness, brings the roof down even when he doesn’t dub for himself. Motta Rajendran’s antics look repetitive at times, though they land well.

This is also among Brahmanandam’s best on-screen appearances in recent times. It’s an absolute joy to see the veteran actor ever-hungry to prove his worth when he senses potential in a scene. John Vijay is in dire need of reinvention with his dialogue delivery and body language. Both songs in the film, composed by Krishna Saurabh, though well-shot, feel abrupt.

A narrative with lesser flab would have amplified the film’s impact. The makers tease the audience with a potential sequel idea, but appreciably it does not appear forced. The film is also complete in itself.

Advertisement

Gurram Paapi Reddy is a smartly written and performed con-comedy that delivers laughs aplenty, though a few segments become indulgent.

Published – December 19, 2025 08:22 pm IST

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ Movie Review and Release Live Updates: James Cameron directorial opens to mixed audience reviews – The Times of India

Published

on

‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ Movie Review and Release Live Updates: James Cameron directorial opens to mixed audience reviews  – The Times of India

James Cameron clarifies Matt Damon’s viral claim that he turned down 10 per cent of ‘Avatar’ profits

Filmmaker James Cameron has addressed actor Matt Damon’s long-circulating claim that he turned down the lead role in Avatar along with a lucrative share of the film’s profits, saying the version widely believed online is “not exactly true.”

For years, Damon has spoken publicly about being offered the role of Jake Sully in the 2009 blockbuster in exchange for 10 per cent of the film’s gross, a deal that would have translated into hundreds of millions of dollars given Avatar’s global earnings of USD 2.9 billion. The role eventually went to Australian actor Sam Worthington, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

“Jim Cameron called me — he offered me 10 per cent of Avatar,” Damon says in the clips. “You will never meet an actor who turned down more money than me … I was in the middle of shooting the Bourne movie and I would have to leave the movie kind of early and leave them in the lurch a little bit and I didn’t want to do that … [Cameron] was really lovely, he said: ‘If you don’t do this, this movie doesn’t really need you. It doesn’t need a movie star at all. The movie is the star, the idea is the star, and it’s going to work. But if you do it, I’ll give you 10 per cent of the movie.’”

However, speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, Cameron said Damon was never formally offered the part. “I can’t remember if I sent him the script or not. I don’t think I did? Then we wound up on a call and he said, ‘I love to explore doing a movie with you. I have a lot of respect for you as a filmmaker. [Avatar] sounds intriguing. But I really have to do this Jason Bourne movie. I’ve agreed to it, it’s a direct conflict, and so, regretfully, I have to turn it down.’ But he was never offered. There was never a deal,” according to The Hollywood Reporter.

Advertisement

The director added that discussions never progressed to character details or negotiations. “We never talked about the character. We never got to that level. It was simply an availability issue,” he said.

Addressing the widely shared belief that Damon turned down a massive payday, Cameron said the actor may have unintentionally merged separate ideas over time. “What he’s done is extrapolate ‘I get 10 percent of the gross on all my films,’” Cameron said, adding that such a deal would not have happened in this case. “So he’s off the hook and doesn’t have to beat himself up anymore.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending