Connect with us

Finance

Are women more effective in sustainable finance than men? – ESG Clarity

Published

on

Are women more effective in sustainable finance than men? – ESG Clarity

Covid-19 has fundamentally altered the global paradigm, and its impacts are evident practically in every facet of our lives. The growing interest in social risk and human capital management, and enthusiasm for ESG and socially responsible investing, has increased worldwide.

In 2023, the majority of assets managed in Europe, comprising approximately €7trn out of a total of €12trn euros, were allocated to ESG funds or strategies with a sustainability-oriented emphasis.

As for asset management in this sector, various research studies show that women are even better investors than their male colleagues and have the ability to bring more profit. Given that, it is essential to have a deeper look at women in asset management and the existing gender gap in this industry.

Positive outcomes of women’s inclusion In asset management

First of all, women exhibit greater efficiency in any fund allocation. They perform better as investors, favouring a “buy and hold” strategy. In contrast with men, women show a reduced tendency to impulsive and emotional decision-making in the stock market, focusing on thoughtful decision-making.

Advertisement

More importantly, the surge of ESG-driven investments stemmed from women’s initiatives and served as one of the essential drivers for change. A study conducted by Goldman Sachs revealed, for the first time in 2020, European funds managed by female or mixed-gender teams outperformed those led exclusively by men. This event may serve as further evidence of women’s positive impact on the asset management industry, which stands out for raising gender diversity in the industry. Thus, the presence of women in this industry brings not only profit but also socially significant changes.

Nevertheless, even though the ESG investment sector is on the rise and women have confirmed their importance in it, it continues to be mostly male-dominated, with women constituting a minority among investors and asset managers. And even in 2023, the problem of the gender gap in this occupation still takes place. According to the 2023 data, it is verified that only 20% of portfolio managers in Spain and Italy are women, and only 5% of women occupy senior management roles. The statistics in the UK and the USA are even worse: 11.8% and 11%, respectively, of workers in this field are women.

Why does gender disparity still exist?

History lessons state that initially, any job was characterised by a dominant number of men engaged in all kinds of activities. The finance and asset management industries that emerged later were no exception. Certainly, the number of women in the sector is growing from year to year. Nevertheless, more time is needed to even out this imbalance.

In addition, the belief that investing is more of a “man’s job” still exists in society and, what is more, is very widespread around the world. On the other hand, this problem has deeper roots. Since ancient times, it has been considered right if a woman does housework and takes care of the whole family. This prejudice creates another impediment to having a full-time job outside the house.

This conviction prevents some women, despite their outstanding abilities, from starting a career in a particular financial environment or climbing the career ladder. Even if a woman gets a job at a company involved in finance, investment or asset management, she may still feel vulnerable because of the representation imbalance and lack of women in senior management or C-suite positions. Moreover, in particular, for starters, it is important to feel supported in a company and have a role model to look up to, and this is often complicated if there are no or few female representatives in the team.

Advertisement

How to tackle the problem of inequality

Reports on wealth management disclose a striking revelation: by 2025, an estimated 60% of the wealth in the UK will be controlled by women. Considering this fact, It is becoming more and more clear why the deep-rooted gender gap problem must be tackled.

The actions for addressing this point must be very concrete: asset management firms should proactively implement measures, such as enabling more women managers to oversee high-net-worth families, individuals, and foundations. A great example of this is The Diversity Project Europe (DPE). One of its fundamental goals is to build a more inclusive asset management industry across the region. Furthermore, this project assists companies in achieving a more gender balanced workforce ‍and promotes social mobility among all genders. Our society does need way more of these illustrations to pave the way for women in the financial industry.

Thus, the main solution to this thorny issue is diversification, which is essential to the realms of investing and asset management. In embracing this, it becomes imperative to promote increased participation of women in asset management careers, ensuring equal opportunities for progress and cultivating an inclusive environment. Following the example of the DPE, in the long-run, the rise of women recognition will be expected and the structural barrier of gender imbalance will be eliminated. This implies introducing training programs to address biases and stereotypes related to gender in hiring, promotions, and decision-making processes, as well as support for women to pursue careers in finance and asset allocation.

These critical measures are pivotal in advancing gender equality within the industry. Beyond women being advantageous for the sector, they are crucial for fortifying and enhancing the resilience of the asset management framework, especially investments related to ESG. The earlier prominent companies realise the significance of augmenting the female workforce, the more advantageous it will be for their long-term profitability.

Advertisement

Finance

Cheers Financial Taps into AI to Build Credit – Los Angeles Business Journal

Published

on

Cheers Financial Taps into AI to Build Credit – Los Angeles Business Journal

A credit-building tool fintech founder Ken Lian built out of personal need just got an artificial intelligence-powered upgrade.

Lian and co-founders Zhen Wang and Qingyi Li recently launched Cheers Financial – a startup run out of Pasadena-based Idealab Inc. which combines fast-tracked credit-building with “immigrant-friendly” onboarding.

“Our mission is really to try to make credit fair to individuals who want to have financial freedom in the U.S.,” Lian said.

After coming to the U.S. as an international student from China in 2008, Lian said he struggled for four years to get a bank’s approval for a credit card. Since 2021, the USC alumnus’ fintech ventures have aimed to break down the hurdles immigrants like him often face in accessing and building credit.

Since its launch in November, Cheers Financial has seen “healthy growth,” Lian said, with thousands using its secured personal loan product to build credit through automated monthly payments. At the end of the 24-month loan period, users get their principal back minus about 12.2% interest.

Advertisement

“The product is designed to automate the entire flow, so users basically can set and forget it,” Lian said.

Cheers, partnering with Minnesota-based Sunrise Banks, boasts an average 21-point increase in credit scores within a couple of months among its users coming in with “fair” scores from the high 500s to mid-600s.

With help from AI data summary and matching, the company reports to the three major credit bureaus every 15 days – two times as frequent as popular credit-building app Kikoff. Lian hopes to shave that down to seven days.

Cheers is far from Lian, Wang and Li’s first step into alternative financial tools. An earlier venture launched in 2021, Cheese Inc., served a similar goal as an online platform providing credit-building loans alongside other services, including a zero-fee debit card with cash back.

Cheese folded when the company it used as its middle layer, Synapse Financial Technologies, collapsed in April 2024 and locked thousands of users out of their savings.

Advertisement

For Lian and other fintech founders, Synapse’s fall was a wake-up call to the gaps and risks of digital banking’s status quo. As he geared up for Cheers, Lian knew in-house models and a direct company-to-bank relationship were key.

“That allows us to build a very secure and stable platform for our users,” Lian said.

Despite cooling investment in fintech, Cheers nabbed backing from San Francisco-based Better Tomorrow Ventures’ $140 million fintech fund. Automating base-level processes with AI has given the company a chance to operate at a lower cost, Lian said.

“You don’t need to build everything from the ground up,” Lian said. “You can let AI build the basic part, and then you optimize from that.”

Strong demand from high-quality users who spread the word to friends and relatives has helped, too. Some have even started Cheers accounts before arriving in the U.S., Lian said, to get a head start on building credit.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

How The Narrative Around ConocoPhillips (COP) Is Shifting With New Research And Cash Flow Concerns

Published

on

How The Narrative Around ConocoPhillips (COP) Is Shifting With New Research And Cash Flow Concerns
ConocoPhillips’ fair value estimate has been adjusted slightly, moving from about US$112.37 to roughly US$111.48, as recent research blends confidence in the company’s execution and balance sheet with more cautious views on crude pricing and near term cash flow. The core discount rate has been held steady at 6.956%, while modest tweaks to revenue growth assumptions, from 1.92% to 1.69%, reflect tempered expectations around demand and realizations that some firms are flagging. Stay tuned to…
Continue Reading

Finance

Africa’s climate finance rules are growing, but they’re weakly enforced – new research

Published

on

Africa’s climate finance rules are growing, but they’re weakly enforced – new research

Climate change is no longer just about melting ice or hotter summers. It is also a financial problem. Droughts, floods, storms and heatwaves damage crops, factories and infrastructure. At the same time, the global push to cut greenhouse gas emissions creates risks for countries that depend on oil, gas or coal.

These pressures can destabilise entire financial systems, especially in regions already facing economic fragility. Africa is a prime example.

Although the continent contributes less than 5% of global carbon emissions, it is among the most vulnerable. In Mozambique, repeated cyclones have destroyed homes, roads and farms, forcing banks and insurers to absorb heavy losses. Kenya has experienced severe droughts that hurt agriculture, reducing farmers’ ability to repay loans. In north Africa, heatwaves strain electricity grids and increase water scarcity.

These physical risks are compounded by “transition risks”, like declining revenues from fossil fuel exports or higher borrowing costs as investors worry about climate instability. Together, they make climate governance through financial policies both urgent and complex. Without these policies, financial systems risk being caught off guard by climate shocks and the transition away from fossil fuels.

This is where climate-related financial policies come in. They provide the tools for banks, insurers and regulators to manage risks, support investment in greener sectors and strengthen financial stability.

Advertisement

Regulators and banks across Africa have started to adopt climate-related financial policies. These range from rules that require banks to consider climate risks, to disclosure standards, green lending guidelines, and green bond frameworks. These tools are being tested in several countries. But their scope and enforcement vary widely across the continent.

My research compiles the first continent-wide database of climate-related financial policies in Africa and examines how differences in these policies – and in how binding they are – affect financial stability and the ability to mobilise private investment for green projects.

A new study I conducted reviewed more than two decades of policies (2000–2025) across African countries. It found stark differences.

South Africa has developed the most comprehensive framework, with policies across all categories. Kenya and Morocco are also active, particularly in disclosure and risk-management rules. In contrast, many countries in central and west Africa have introduced only a few voluntary measures.

Why does this matter? Voluntary rules can help raise awareness and encourage change, but on their own they often do not go far enough. Binding measures, on the other hand, tend to create stronger incentives and steadier progress. So far, however, most African climate-related financial policies remain voluntary. This leaves climate risk as something to consider rather than a firm requirement.

Advertisement

Uneven landscape

In Africa, the 2015 Paris Agreement marked a clear turning point. Around that time, policy activity increased noticeably, suggesting that international agreements and standards could help create momentum and visibility for climate action. The expansion of climate-related financial policies was also shaped by domestic priorities and by pressure from international investors and development partners.

But since the late 2010s, progress has slowed. Limited resources, overlapping institutional responsibilities and fragmented coordination have made it difficult to sustain the earlier pace of reform.

Looking across the continent, four broad patterns have emerged.

A few countries, such as South Africa, have developed comprehensive frameworks. These include:

  • disclosure rules (requirements for banks and companies to report how climate risks affect them)

  • stress tests (simulations of extreme climate or transition scenarios to see whether banks would remain resilient).

Others, including Kenya and Morocco, are steadily expanding their policy mix, even if institutional capacity is still developing.

Advertisement

Some, such as Nigeria and Egypt, are moderately active, with a focus on disclosure rules and green bonds. (Those are bonds whose proceeds are earmarked to finance environmentally friendly projects such as renewable energy, clean transport or climate-resilient infrastructure.)

Finally, many countries in central and west Africa have introduced only a limited number of measures, often voluntary in nature.

This uneven landscape has important consequences.

The net effect

In fossil fuel-dependent economies such as South Africa, Egypt and Algeria, the shift away from coal, oil and gas could generate significant transition risks. These include:

  • financial instability, for example when asset values in carbon-intensive sectors fall sharply or credit exposures deteriorate

  • stranded assets, where fossil fuel infrastructure and reserves lose their economic value before the end of their expected life because they can no longer be used or are no longer profitable under stricter climate policies.

Addressing these challenges may require policies that combine investment in new, low-carbon sectors with targeted support for affected workers, communities and households.

Advertisement

Climate finance affects people directly. When droughts lead to loan defaults, local banks are strained. Insurance companies facing repeated payouts after floods may raise premiums. Pension funds invested in fossil fuels risk devaluations as these assets lose value. Climate-related financial policies therefore matter not only for regulators and markets, but also for jobs, savings, and everyday livelihoods.

At the same time, there are opportunities.

Firstly, expanding access to green bonds and sustainability-linked loans can channel private finance into renewable energy, clean transport, or resilient infrastructure.

Secondly, stronger disclosure rules can improve transparency and investor confidence.

Thirdly, regional harmonisation through common reporting standards, for example, would reduce fragmentation. This would make it easier for Africa to attract global climate finance.

Advertisement

Looking ahead

International forums such as the UN climate conferences (COP) and the G20 have helped to push this agenda forward, mainly by setting expectations rather than hard rules. These initiatives create pressure and guidance. But they remain soft law. Turning them into binding, enforceable rules still depends on decisions taken by national regulators and governments.

International partners such as the African Development Bank and the African Union could support coordination by promoting continental standards that define what counts as a green investment. Donors and multilateral lenders may also provide technical expertise and financial support to countries with weaker systems, helping them move from voluntary guidelines toward more enforceable rules.

South Africa, already a regional leader, could share its experience with stress testing and green finance frameworks.

Africa also has the potential to position itself as a hub for renewable energy and sustainable finance. With vast solar and wind resources, expanding urban centres, and an increasingly digital financial sector, the continent could leapfrog towards a greener future if investment and regulation advance together.

Success stories in Kenya’s sustainable banking practices and Morocco’s renewable energy expansion show that progress is possible when financial systems adapt.

Advertisement

What happens next will matter greatly. By expanding and enforcing climate-related financial rules, Africa can reduce its vulnerability to climate shocks while unlocking opportunities in green finance and renewable energy.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending