Connect with us

Finance

Why has the UAE closed its stock exchanges?

Published

on

Why has the UAE closed its stock exchanges?

The United Arab Emirates has closed its main stock exchanges amid a widening conflict in the region following the United States and Israel’s attacks on Iran.

The UAE’s financial regulator on Sunday announced that its key exchanges in Dubai and Abu Dhabi would not immediately reopen after the weekend break amid the fallout of the US-Israeli attacks that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The announcement that the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange and Dubai Financial Market would remain closed on Monday and Tuesday came after the UAE was hit with hundreds of Iranian missile and drone attacks, including a strike on Abu Dhabi’s main airport that killed one person and wounded seven others.

The UAE’s Capital Markets Authority said in a statement that it would continue to monitor developments in the region and “assess the situation on an ongoing basis, taking any further measures as necessary”.

Here is all you need to know about the move.

Advertisement

Why has the UAE decided to shut its main stock exchanges?

The financial regulator did not elaborate on the rationale for its decision, only saying that it was taken in accordance with its “supervisory and regulatory role” in managing the country’s financial markets.

While closing the stock market outside of scheduled breaks is relatively unusual worldwide, especially in the era of electronic trading, it is not unprecedented.

Typically, when financial authorities halt stock trading during a crisis, it is because they are concerned about panic selling.

During periods of extreme volatility, such as wars and financial crises, investors often rush to sell their holdings to avoid suffering big losses.

As investors sell their stocks, the market value falls further.

Advertisement

This dynamic can spur a vicious cycle that, left unchecked, can lead to a full-blown market crash.

Since the US-Israeli attacks on Iran, stock markets around the world have seen significant – though not catastrophic – losses, while oil prices have risen sharply.

Saudi Arabia’s benchmark Tadawul All Share Index fell more than 4 percent on Sunday, while Egypt’s EGX 30 dropped about 2.5 percent.

In Asia, major stock markets closed lower on Monday, with Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index down about 1.4 percent and 2.2 percent, respectively.

The practice of shutting the market to prevent panic selling is controversial among economists and investors.

Advertisement

Closing the market prevents investors from accessing cash they might need in a hurry.

Critics also argue that such closures only exacerbate the sense of panic they seek to prevent and distort important signals about the market.

“Investors don’t like uncertainty, and at times of market stress, liquidity is most important. It appears the UAE just took that away,” Burdin Hickok, a professor at New York University’s School of Professional Studies, told Al Jazeera.

“This move has the potential of diminishing the status of Dubai as a true major market and weaken investor confidence in the Dubai markets. There has to be some concern about capital flight and negative ripple effects.”

Has this happened before?

The UAE has closed its stock exchanges before, though not due to regional conflict.

Advertisement

In 2022, the UAE halted trading as part of a period of mourning declared to mark the death of President Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

The emirate announced a similar pause following the death of Dubai’s ruler, Sheikh Maktoum bin Rashid Al Maktoum, in 2006.

“Historically, to the best of my knowledge, no Middle Eastern state, including Israel, has closed its stock exchange during a time of regional conflict,” Hickok said.

“In prior conflicts, Israel has modified hours of their exchange, but we are talking hours, not days.”

Other countries have shuttered their stock markets during periods of major turmoil in recent years.

Advertisement

After Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, authorities shut the Moscow Exchange for nearly a month.

In 2011, Egypt shut its stock exchange for nearly two months as the country was grappling with the upheaval of the Arab Spring.

After the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq halted trading for six days, the longest suspension since the Great Depression.

How important is the UAE’s stock market?

The UAE is a relatively small player in the world of capital markets, though it has made significant inroads in recent years.

The Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange and Dubai Financial Market have a combined market capitalisation of about $1.1 trillion.

Advertisement

By comparison, the New York Stock Exchange, the world’s biggest bourse, has a market capitalisation of about $44 trillion.

Saudi Arabia’s Saudi Exchange, the biggest exchange in the Middle East, is valued at more than $3 trillion.

Still, the UAE’s stature among financial markets has been on the rise.

Before the latest crisis, UAE-listed stocks had been on a winning streak.

The Dubai Financial Market General Index, which includes companies such as Emirates NBD and Emaar Properties, rose more than 29 percent in the 12 months to February 27.

Advertisement

Haytham Aoun, an assistant professor of finance at the American University in Dubai, said while the UAE could see some outflow of foreign capital, the country’s economy remains on a strong footing.

“A temporary stock market closure will have a limited impact on long-term economic variables, provided the fundamentals remain strong,” Aoun told Al Jazeera.

“In the UAE case, it’s a precautionary intervention, and not a sign of structural weakness.”

Finance

New global framework launched to help financial firms make transition plans

Published

on

New global framework launched to help financial firms make transition plans

Photo by Statkraft

The International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) has published a new framework aimed at helping financial institutions make credible plans to work towards the net zero transition.

The new voluntary standard for sustainable finance – ISO 32212 – includes guidelines for strategic transition planning by banking, insurance and investment institutions.

“The requirements and recommendations are designed to enable financial institutions to develop and maintain transition planning objectives and targets that advance the temperature and resilience goals of the Paris Agreement, and establish robust policies and processes to integrate these into their financial activities,” the ISO said.

Advertisement

ISO said the framework encourages institutions to assess climate-related impacts and dependencies associated with their activities, and to develop objectives and targets to better manage risks and opportunities. It includes guidelines on monitoring and reporting internally and externally, and on establishing guardrails and controls to ensure transition planning is credible.

A new report shows that the world’s biggest banks increased their funding to fossil fuel companies by 8% in 2025, although some, particularly in Europe, are cutting financing due to climate risk concerns and regulation.

The UK’s national standards agency, the BSI, welcomed the new ISO framework, noting that it had input from a broad coalition including representatives of finance sector organisations and experts from national standards bodies from around the world. 

“The framework will help institutions move from ambition to implementation through transparent and credible transition planning. We encourage financial institutions worldwide to pick up the standard, benefit their businesses and support the global adoption of credible transition planning,” said Scott Steedman, BSI director general of standards.

The BSI said research shows that 91% of UK businesses want help to accelerate their transition, with a focus on financial incentives and practical, skills-based guidance.

Advertisement

Sara Hall, co-executive director at advocacy group Positive Money, welcomed the new standards but said regulation had to be made binding, especially given the departure of many US banks from voluntary initiatives like the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) since Donald Trump became US President.

“Private financial institutions are not changing their behaviour at the scale or speed necessary to meet global climate targets,” Hall said. 

Any measures short of mandatory simply won’t cut it. That’s why binding regulation and supervisory standards enforced by central banks and financial regulators at the national level, with penalisation for transgression, are vital to drive transition”.

The European Union has removed the obligation for companies to adopt a climate transition plan under revisions to the corporate sustainability due diligence directive (CSDDD). However, companies still need to submit a transition plan under the corporate sustainability reporting directive (CSRD).

Only 41% of EU banks had published their transition plans in 2024, despite being required to do so, while very few have a Paris-aligned pathway, according to a report from Finance Watch.

Advertisement

This page was last updated June 12, 2026

Written by

Emma Thomasson author photo

Emma Thomasson is a British journalist, consultant and trainer based in Berlin. She is an expert in economics, politics, business and technology. She previously worked for Reuters as a correspondent and bureau chief in Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands, South Africa and the UK.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Some motorists who pay monthly for insurance ‘charged annual rates close to 30%’

Published

on

Some motorists who pay monthly for insurance ‘charged annual rates close to 30%’

Some motorists are continuing to pay high interest rates when spreading the cost of their car insurance, according to analysis by Which?

The consumer group said some firms are charging annual percentage rates (APRs) comparable to expensive credit cards.

Some firms are still charging APRs of close to 30% on monthly motor insurance payments, Which? said.

Which? said it had found that between February and March 2026, several firms were charging APRs above 25% and some were charging as much as 29.9%.

It said that paying monthly is often the only realistic option for households facing financial pressure, creating a “poverty premium”.

Advertisement

Two years ago, some firms were charging rates above 35% APR, according to Which?

It said that while some providers have lowered their rates since then, it believes that progress has been too slow.

Which? said that between February and March, it attempted to contact 61 car insurance brands, asking about the representative APRs charged to their customers who pay monthly.

Some 48 responded with their rates, or said they did not charge extra for paying in instalments

Rocio Concha, director of policy and advocacy at Which? said: “Millions of motorists rely on monthly payments to afford essential car insurance cover, yet many are still being charged interest rates comparable to an expensive credit card.”

Advertisement

A spokesperson for the Association of British Insurers (ABI) said: “The industry recognises that many households are under financial pressure, and it understands why spreading the cost of cover is essential for many motorists.

Premium finance is widely used across the market with charges that can differ between insurers and by product.

“Our members remain committed to improving outcomes, and this includes being open about the fact that providing this service involves genuine operational costs – including keeping cover in place for a period even when payments are delayed or missed.

“Our premium finance principles make clear that any charges must be fair, transparent, and reflective of the costs incurred by insurers. The FCA’s (Financial Conduct Authority’s) own market study found that premium finance can deliver fair value for consumers and that the overall cost of premium finance has fallen since 2022.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Why Your Idle Cash Is Losing Value and How to Secure Much Higher Yields in 2026

Published

on

Why Your Idle Cash Is Losing Value and How to Secure Much Higher Yields in 2026

Cash accounts are having a moment, thanks to the decent interest rates they now pay, at long last. But selecting one can be a daunting task given the profusion of choices —from money market accounts to money market mutual funds to a small clutch of newly hatched money market exchange-traded funds.

The term money market has become a catch-all description for a variety of interest-bearing products that follow different rules. The offerings also vary in yield, ease of accessibility and, to a small degree, levels of safety. “In some respects, money market has become more of a marketing term than a technical term,” says Ted Rossman of Bankrate, a website that evaluates bank products. “There’s a lot of confusion about this.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending