Finance
Private equity’s insurance binge brings new risks to global finance
A DECADE OR so ago private equity was a niche corner of finance; today it is a vast enterprise in its own right. Having grabbed business and prestige from banks, private-equity firms manage $12trn of assets globally, are worth more than $500bn on America’s stockmarket and have their pick of Wall Street’s top talent. Whereas America’s listed banks are worth little more than they were before the pandemic, its listed private-equity firms are worth about twice as much. The biggest, Blackstone, is more valuable than either Goldman Sachs or Morgan Stanley—and has the confidence of a winner. “It’s the alternatives era,” proclaimed the company’s ebullient Taylor Swift-themed festive video in December. “We buy assets then we make ’em better.”
This is not, though, the business that has recently boomed for them. Traditional private equity—using lots of debt to buy companies, improving them, and selling or listing them—has been lifeless. High interest rates have cast doubt on the value of privately held companies and reduced investors’ willingness to provide new funds. It does not seem to matter. Core private-equity activity is now just one part of the industry’s terrain, which includes infrastructure, property and loans made directly to companies, all under the broad label of “private assets”. Here the empire-building continues. Most recently, as we report this week, the industry is swallowing up life insurers.
All of the three kings of private equity—Apollo, Blackstone and KKR—have bought insurers or taken minority stakes in them in exchange for managing their assets. Smaller firms are following suit. The insurers are not portfolio investments, destined to be sold for a profit. Instead they are prized for their vast balance-sheets, which are a new source of funding.
Judged by the fundamentals, the strategy makes sense. Insurance firms invest over long periods to fund payouts, including annuities sold to pensioners. They have traditionally bought lots of government and corporate bonds that are traded on public markets. Firms like Apollo can instead knowledgeably move their portfolios into the higher-yielding private investments in which they specialise. A higher rate of return should mean a better deal for customers. And because insurers’ liabilities stretch years into the future, the finance they provide is patient. In banking, long-term loans are funded with lots of instantly accessible deposits; with private assets and insurance, the duration of the assets matches the duration of the liabilities.
Yet the strategy brings risks—and not just to the firms. Pension promises matter to society. Implicitly or explicitly, the taxpayer backstops insurance to some degree, and regulators enforce minimum capital requirements so that insurers can withstand losses. Yet judging the safety-buffers of a firm stuffed with illiquid private assets is hard, because its losses are not apparent from movements in financial markets. And in a crisis insurance policyholders may sometimes flee as they seek to get out some of their money even if that entails a financial penalty. Last year an Italian insurer suffered just such a bank-run-like meltdown.
Making things harder is the complexity of the tie-ups, which involve labyrinthine interlinkages between different bits of firms’ balance-sheets. Much reinsurance activity takes place in Bermuda, an offshore hub where there is more than a whiff of regulatory arbitrage. Yet compared with the zealots who police the global banking system, insurance regulators are docile.
As private assets become more important, that must change. Regulators should co-operate internationally to ensure that the safety-buffers are adequate. High standards of transparency and capital need to be enforced by suitably heavyweight bodies. The goal should not be to crush a new business model, but to make it safer. Financial innovation often brings new benefits even as it creates new ways to blow up the system. Regulators would be making a mistake to ignore either edge of the sword. ■
Finance
State finance committee approves bill to fund homeless veterans support
People working to support homeless veterans say a bill advancing in the state Capitol would provide much needed funding. But they also say it doesn’t address a housing need outside of southeastern Wisconsin.
This week, the Legislature’s Joint Finance Committee unanimously approved funding for the bill, which would provide $1.9 million spread out in $25 per diem payments to nonprofits that house veterans.
Greg Fritsch is president of the Center for Veterans Issues, a Milwaukee-based nonprofit that provides housing and supportive services for veterans throughout the state. Fritsch told WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” that the bill is a step in the right direction.
News with a little more humanity
WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” newsletter keeps you connected to the state you love without feeling overwhelmed. No paywall. No agenda. No corporate filter.
“It’s not enough, but it will go a long way,” he said.
Besides safe housing, the Center for Veterans Issues program offers support programs and meals to veterans. Fritsch said his group typically operates on a yearly $500,000 deficit, which the bill’s funding would help alleviate.
“Costs never stop going up,” he said. “This will go a long way to helping us provide more beds to veterans.”
Fritsch said his program currently houses 81 men and five women in sites around southeastern Wisconsin.
Currently, the federal Department of Veterans Affairs provides about $85 in per diem payments to nonprofit veterans support organizations for housing and care.
While Fritsch said his organization provides some services like rental assistance statewide, its transitional housing work is only happening in southeastern Wisconsin.
Joey Hoey, assistant deputy secretary at the Wisconsin Department of Veterans Affairs, told “Wisconsin Today” there is clearly a problem in finding safe housing for veterans, and funding is part of that problem.
Hoey said the $85 per diem payments from the federal VA “is barely enough to house (veterans), let alone provide the kind of counseling and education to get people back on their feet.”
In September of last year, the state VA closed two of its Veteran Housing and Recovery Program facilities, one based in Chippewa Falls and the other in Green Bay.
The bill advanced by the finance committee would not provide the state VA with money to reopen the centers. Instead, it goes toward nonprofit programs which are currently based in southeastern Wisconsin, according to Hoey.
“We fully support these nonprofits — they’re our partners and they do great work. But they’re in Madison, Janesville and Milwaukee,” he said. “It means that none of this money is going to help, no matter what some might try and tell you. This money is not going to help homeless veterans in the northern and western parts of the state.”
Hoey said he previously warned lawmakers the closures of state facilities in northern Wisconsin would happen without proper funding in the state budget. The compromise budget between Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and the Republican-controlled Legislature didn’t include funding for the state VA facilities.
“The Joint Finance Committee did this knowing full well that we would have to close those two facilities,” Hoey said. “When the Legislature voted the final vote and didn’t put that money back in the budget, we had to make the tough decision to figure out how much money we had, and we could only keep one of the sites open.”
The state VA still operates a veterans care facility in Union Grove in southeastern Wisconsin.
Finance
Visa Platform Offers Small Businesses Access to Financing, Marketing and Tech Support | PYMNTS.com
Visa has launched a new platform designed to help small business owners access capital, reach customers and adopt modern business tools.
Finance
Major bank ‘really sorry’ over email to customers as Aussies slugged from tomorrow
An Australian bank has apologised to its customers after telling them it was “pleased” to swiftly pass on the RBA’s latest rate hike this week. ME Bank is among the quickest lenders to pass on the interest rake hike, with customers to start incurring the higher level of interest from Saturday.
Understandably, most customers did not welcome the news. A sentiment that the was perhaps compounded by the bank’s cheery tone and apparent delight.
While a rate hike was widely predicted by the market and economists, ME Bank’s team apparently weren’t quite as prepared, seemingly using the same correspondence from the previous rate cuts last year.
On Wednesday night shortly after 9pm, the bank again emailed customers saying it was “really sorry” about the correspondence and any confusion it caused.
RELATED
“This email was sent in error, and does not reflect ME’s commitment to communicate to you with clarity and empathy.
“We understand that rates increases can be challenging, and we’re here to support you.”
The mea culpa came five hours after the bank’s initial correspondence, with plenty of customers taking to social media to poke fun at the gaffe, with some even claiming it was enough for them to think about switching lenders.
Yahoo Finance contacted ME Bank to ask about the error.
Most major lenders will not start charging the higher level of interest until late next week, or the week after, according to an extensive roundup from consumer group Finder.
ME Bank customers will be among the earliest to be subject to the higher rate when it takes effect from Saturday, February 7.
Borrowers with BOQ, which owns ME Bank, will be hit from tomorrow, February 6.
ING Bank customers will be effected from Tuesday, February 10.
ANZ, Commonwealth Bank and NAB customers will be impacted from Friday, February 13. The same day as Bankwest and Suncorp customers.
Westpac borrowers will see their interest increased a few days later on February 17. Some of the other subsidiaries of the Big Four lenders will also pass it on that day, including St George, Bank of Melbourne and Bank SA. It’s the same date for Teachers Mutual and Uni Bank.
Meanwhile Macquarie Bank will pass it on from February 20.
A majority of mortgage borrowers didn’t reduce their payments after the recent rate cuts, so the RBA’s move this week might not cool the economy to the degree it wants. For that reason, forecasters are predicting further rate hikes to come for borrowers this year.
-
Indiana4 days ago13-year-old rider dies following incident at northwest Indiana BMX park
-
Massachusetts5 days agoTV star fisherman, crew all presumed dead after boat sinks off Massachusetts coast
-
Tennessee6 days agoUPDATE: Ohio woman charged in shooting death of West TN deputy
-
Movie Reviews1 week agoVikram Prabhu’s Sirai Telugu Dubbed OTT Movie Review and Rating
-
Indiana4 days ago13-year-old boy dies in BMX accident, officials, Steel Wheels BMX says
-
Politics1 week agoVirginia Democrats seek dozens of new tax hikes, including on dog walking and dry cleaning
-
Austin, TX7 days ago
TEA is on board with almost all of Austin ISD’s turnaround plans
-
Texas5 days agoLive results: Texas state Senate runoff