Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

2024 San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition Sweepstakes Winners

Published

on

2024 San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition Sweepstakes Winners


Cloverdale, CA, – There were over fifty judges, representing various North American wine regions, evaluating over 5,500 wines from nearly 1,000 wineries for the 2024 San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition this week.

Bob Fraser, SFCWC executive director, says, “The wineries of North America had a strong showing at our 2024 competition. It was an outstanding event, and we congratulate all of the top award winners.”

Sweepstakes winners are as follows:

  • Sparkling Sweepstake Winner: Chandon Blanc de Pinot Noir California, CA $27.00
  • White Sweepstake Winner: Las Positas Vineyards 2023 Verdelho Livermore Valley CA $42.00
  • White Sweepstake Winner: Annadel Estate Winery 2022 Chardonnay Gap’s Crown Vineyard Sonoma Coast CA $58.00
  • Rosé Sweepstake Winner: The Four Graces 2022 Rose Wine Willamette Valley OR $20.99
  • Red Sweepstake Winner: Cooper Vineyards 2021 Barbera Amador County CA $33.00
  • Specialty Sweepstake Winner: Cinquain Cellars 2013 Touriga & Tinto Cao Dessert Wine Nagengast Estate Vineyard Paso Robles CA $100.00
  • Specialty Sweepstake Winner: Arrington Vineyards 2022 Sweet Gewurztraminer Honeysuckle American TN $25.00
  • Packaging Sweepstake Winner: Blair Estate 2020 Muscat Ottonel Arroyo Seco CA $75.00

How Contra Costa County Grapes scored in the competition:

Bloomfield Vineyards CA Cab Sauv – $60.00 – $69.99 2021 San Francisco Bay Cabernet Sauvignon $60.00 Silver
Bloomfield Vineyards CA Chardonnay – $40.00 – $45.99 2022 Contra Costa County Chardonnay $40.00 Silver
Bloomfield Vineyards CA Sauvignon Blanc/Fume – $31.00 and over 2022 Contra Costa County Sauvignon Blanc $38.00 Silver
Bloomfield Vineyards CA White Blends – $30.00 and Over 2022 Contra Costa County Devils Daughter White Wine $42.00 Silver

 

Campos Family Vineyards CA Mourvedre 2020 Contra Costa County Mourvedre $38.00 Bronze
Campos Family Vineyards CA Petite Sirah – $39.00 – $46.99 2021 Contra Costa County Petite Sirah $39.00 Gold
Campos Family Vineyards CA Rose Sparkling (non-Pinot Noir Varietal) NV Contra Costa County Estate Sparkling Rose $39.00 Gold
Campos Family Vineyards CA Dry Rose (Blend) – RS .1 -..299 2022 Contra Costa County Lilly Rose $29.00 Silver
Campos Family Vineyards CA Red Blend: Barbera leading blend 2021 Contra Costa County Gigis Blend $44.00 Silver

 

Advertisement
Carol Shelton Wines CA Barbera – Up to – $34.99 2022 Contra Costa County d Oakley Barbera $29.99 Silver
Carol Shelton Wines CA Zinfandel – $23.00 – $28.99 2021 Contra Costa Oakley Zinfandel $27.99 Silver

 

Cline Cellars CA Zinfandel – Up to – $22.99 2021 Contra Costa County Ancient Vines Zinfandel $15.99 Gold

 

Dante Robere Vineyards CA Carignan/Carignane 2019 Contra Costa Carignane $44.00 Gold
Dante Robere Vineyards CA Alicante Bouschet 2021 Contra Costa Alicante Bouschet $39.00 Silver

 

l Vaquero CA Carignan/Carignane 2021 Contra Costa County One-Eyed Charley Carignane $36.00 Silver

 

Favalora Vineyards Winery CA Carignan/Carignane 2020 Contra Costa County Carignane $38.00 Bronze
Favalora Vineyards Winery CA Dry Rose (one varietal) – RS 0 2022 Contra Costa County Rose De Sophia Carignane $26.00 Double Gold
Favalora Vineyards Winery CA Barbera – Up to – $34.99 2021 Contra Costa County Barbera $34.00 Silver
Favalora Vineyards Winery CA Cab Sauv – $36.00 – $39.99 2021 Contra Costa County Cabernet Sauvignon $36.00 Silver
Favalora Vineyards Winery CA Dry Rose (one varietal – RS .3 – .99 2022 Contra Costa County Rose De Sophia Barbera $26.00 Silver
Favalora Vineyards Winery CA Zinfandel – $35.00 – $39.99 2021 Contra Costa County Zinfandel $36.00 Silver

 

Advertisement
Jacuzzi Family Vineyards CA Montepulciano 2021 Contra Costa County Montepulciano $38.00 Double Gold

 

Serendipity Cellars CA Dry Rose (one varietal) – RS 0 2022 Contra Costa County Rose All Day $26.00 Bronze
Serendipity Cellars CA Chardonnay – $32.00 – $35.99 2022 Contra Costa County California Sunset Chardonnay $32.00 Gold
Serendipity Cellars CA Blanc de Blancs 2022 Contra Costa County Vermentino Sparkling $34.00 Silver
Serendipity Cellars CA Cab Sauv – $45.00 – $49.99 2021 Contra Costa County Cabernet Sauvignon $46.00 Silver
Serendipity Cellars CA Chardonnay – $28.00 – $ 31.99 2022 Contra Costa County Chardonnay $30.00 Silver
Serendipity Cellars CA Chardonnay – $28.00 – $ 31.99 2022 Contra Costa County California Sunrise Chardonnay $30.00 Silver
Serendipity Cellars CA Petite Sirah – $39.00 – $46.99 2021 Contra Costa County Petite Sirah $46.00 Silver
Serendipity Cellars CA Tempranillo – $40.00 & Over 2021 Contra Costa County Tempranillo $43.00 Silver
Serendipity Cellars CA Vermentino 2022 Contra Costa County Vermentino $28.00 Silver
Serendipity Cellars CA White Blends – $30.00 and Over 2022 Contra Costa County Barn Blend White White Blend $37.00 Silver

 

Thal Vineyards CA Sweet Red 2016 Contra Costa Ruby Red Forte $40.00 Bronze
Thal Vineyards CA Tempranillo – Up to – $39.99 2019 Contra Costa County Tempranillo $30.00 Bronze
Thal Vineyards CA Red Blend: Cab Sauv leading blend – $40.00 – $47.99 2021 Lamorinda Lilys Blend $40.00 Gold
Thal Vineyards CA Red Blend: Cab Sauv leading blend – $40.00 – $47.99 2020 Lamorinda Lilys Blend $40.00 Silver

 

Unfiltered Crush Petite Sirah 2019 CA Petite Sirah – $47.00 & Over 2019 Contra Costa County Petite Sirah $85.00 Silver

Consumers are invited to visit the www.winejudging.com website for a complete list of the 2024 award-winning wines. The San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition Public Tasting will be at the Festival Pavilion, Fort Mason Center, San Francisco, Saturday, February 17, 2024 from 1:30-4:30 PM. Tickets are available on the www.winejudging.com website. All gold and above winning wines will be recognized in the San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition Awards special section of the publication on Sunday, February 11, 2024.


Last Years San Francisco Chronicle Wine Competition Sweepstakes Winners

Advertisement



Source link

San Francisco, CA

Which San Francisco Giants Prospects Are Real Depth vs. Marketing Names

Published

on

Which San Francisco Giants Prospects Are Real Depth vs. Marketing Names


The San Francisco Giants are likely to break camp with one of their top prospects on the 26-man roster. But they’re all getting plenty of work in camp.

The thing is, just because a prospect doesn’t make a 26-man opening day roster doesn’t mean they can’t help a Major League team at some point in the season. Others, for now, are working on developing talent.

In this exercise, five prospects that are part of Major League camp were selected to determine if they’re real depth this season or if they’re marketing names — for now. Marketing names can become real depth before one knows it, such as the first Giants prospect listed.

Advertisement

Bryce Eldridge: Real Depth

San Francisco Giants Bryce Eldridge | Joe Camporeale-Imagn Images
Advertisement

Eldridge has nothing left to prove at the minor league level after he was selected in the first round in the 2023 MLB draft. Back then, he was the classic example of a marketing name, one that creates buzz in the organization and with fans.

Advertisement

But, after more than two years of development and a taste of the Majors, he’s real depth. He’s expected to make the opening day roster and share time at first base and designated hitter with Rafael Devers, one of the game’s most established sluggers.

On Wednesday, he hit his first spring training home run, one of three in the 13-12 loss to the Milwaukee Brewers.

Advertisement

Blake Tidwell: Real Depth

Tennessee pitcher Blake Tidwell | Brianna Paciorka/News Sentinel / USA TODAY NETWORK

Tidwell was acquired from the New York Mets in July in the Tyler Rogers trade. He only pitched in four games for the Mets, so he still has prospect status. But that MLB service time, combined with his early impressions in camp, make him real depth for a team that only has one or two spots available on the pitching staff.

Tidwell may not make the team out of camp for opening day. But he’s one of those prospects that could make his way to San Francisco during the season due to injury or underperformance. It’s an example of using the time in spring training wisely and paving the way for a future promotion.

Advertisement

Will Bednar: Real Depth

Mississippi St. Bulldogs pitcher Will Bednar. | Steven Branscombe-Imagn Images
Advertisement

The Giants have been waiting for their first-round pick in the 2021 MLB draft to pay off, and this might be the year that Will Bednar finally makes the jump to the Majors. He’s in Major League camp and he’s been converted into a reliever in the past couple of seasons.

Advertisement

He went 2-3 with a 5.68 ERA in 38 games, his full season as a reliever. But he’s impressed the new coaching staff during camp and there’s enough buzz around him to consider him a potential call-up during the season. He’s in his fifth professional season so the Rule 5 draft is a consideration this coming offseason.

Parks Harber: Marketing Name

For now, the young third baseman is going to create a lot of buzz in the farm system in 2026, but he isn’t a threat to anyone’s job yet. Picked up in the Camilo Doval trade, he only has 102 minor league games under his belt after he was signed as an undrafted free agent by the New York Yankees. He got his first spring training hit on Wednesday. His career slash of .312/.413/.528 is encouraging but he hasn’t played higher than High-A Eugene.

Advertisement

Bo Davidson: Marketing Name

San Francisco Giants left fielder Bo Davidson. | Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images
Advertisement

The Giants signed Davidson as an undrafted free agent and he’s starting to generate real buzz in spring training as a non-roster invitee. He’s not quite real depth yet because he has yet to play above Double-A Richmond. But the way he’s playing in the spring he should be at Sacramento sometime this season, which puts him in the position to be real depth.

Advertisement

He’s hit well at every stop, but he showed off more power than ever last season. He hit a career-best 18 home runs and 70 RBI as he slashed .281/.376/.468. He played 42 games at Richmond last season.




Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Three Takeaways as Giants Suffer First Spring Training Loss of Campaign

Published

on

Three Takeaways as Giants Suffer First Spring Training Loss of Campaign


The San Francisco Giants weren’t giving up that undefeated spring training slate without a fight, apparently.

Wednesday’s game between the Giants and the Milwaukee Brewers came down to a raucous ninth inning that saw the two teams combine for seven runs. Milwaukee had the final at-bat and rallied to win, 13-12.

If you like our content, choose Sports Illustrated as a preferred source on Google.

Advertisement

A lot happened in this one, not the least of which was Harrison Bader’s home run putting a dent in a food truck.

Advertisement

Here are three important takeaways from the game.

Adrian Houser’s Giants Debut

Advertisement

San Francisco Giants pitcher Adrian Houser. | Rick Scuteri-Imagn Images

Before this game got out of hand, Adrian Houser made his first spring training start and looked solid.

He pitched two innings, giving up three hits, one run and one walk. He also allowed a home run. He threw 36 pitches, 23 of which were strikes. The right-hander figures to be the third or fourth starter in the rotation, depending upon how San Francisco wants to line up Houser and Tyler Mahle behind Logan Webb and Robbie Ray.

Houser resurrected his career last season with the Chicago White Sox and the Tampa Bay Rays, as he combined to go 8-5 with a 3.31 ERA in 21 starts, with 92 strikeouts and 38 walks in 125 innings. It was his best season since going 10-6 with Milwaukee in 2021.

Advertisement

Power Surge

San Francisco Giants first baseman Bryce Eldridge. | Neville E. Guard-Imagn Images
Advertisement

The Giants are looking for more slug in their lineup in 2026. Part of that is a long-term project that included signing Willy Adames last offseason and trading for Rafael Devers last June. Both hit at least 30 home runs last season. That’s sustainable power for San Francisco. But they could use more and some of that was on display in Wednesday’s game.

Advertisement

Bader’s home run got a lot of attention. But two other Giants hit home runs, each slugging their first of spring training. Luis Matos, an outfielder that was the designated hitter, slammed one in the second inning. Then, Bryce Eldridge, who played first base, hit one in the third inning.

San Francisco’s ability to compete offensively with the top teams in the National League won’ just hinge on Adames and Devers. It will hinge on what others can produce, too. From that standpoint Wednesday was a good day.

Advertisement

Parkr Harber’s Instant Offense

San Francisco Giants infielder Parks Harber. | Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

Parks Harber isn’t going to make the opening day roster. But that’s not expected. The top prospect, acquired in the Camilo Doval trade from the New York Yankees, is off to a solid start to his first spring training with the Giants.

He entered Wednesday’s game as a pinch-hitter and in his only at-bat he claimed a hit and drove in a run. It pushed his spring training batting average to .333. The downside? It was his first hit of spring training. But, the fact that a young player entered the game as a pinch hitter and drove in a run is a good sign for his ability to come off the bench later in his career and give the Giants something.

Advertisement




Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

San Francisco supervisors approve ordinance declaring

Published

on

San Francisco supervisors approve ordinance declaring


The San Francisco Board of Supervisors has approved an ordinance prohibiting federal immigration operations on city property, joining other Bay Area jurisdictions.

On Tuesday, the board unanimously approved what was dubbed the “ICE Free Zones” ordinance, authored by supervisors Bilal Mahmood and Chyanne Chen.

“When immigration enforcement shows up at or near public facilities, we know what happens: people disappear from services, kids miss school, witnesses don’t report crimes, and the City can’t do its job,” Mahmood said in a statement.

According to the board, the measure prohibits any entity from commandeering city property that disrupts the city’s operations. The measure also clarifies that the use of city property to assist the enforcement of federal immigration law is not a city purpose.

Advertisement

Under the measure, the city attorney would be authorized to take legal action against any entity engaged in the unlawful or unauthorized use of city property.

“This legislation is a necessary piece in upholding our Sanctuary City commitments. We will not stand for ICE to use our public properties to aid their harassment or terrorization of San Franciscans,” said Chen.

San Francisco has had a Sanctuary City ordinance in place since 1989, which prohibits city employees from using city funds or resources to assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in enforcing federal immigration law unless such assistance is required by federal or state law.

The city also approved a measure in 2013 which limits law enforcement in giving ICE advance notice of a person’s release from jail, along with prohibiting cooperation with ICE detainer requests, also known as “ICE holds.”

Sanctuary policies have been a target of the Trump administration, which has filed multiple lawsuits against more than a dozen Democratic-led states, counties and cities over the policies since last year. Most of the lawsuits remain pending in federal courts across the country.

Advertisement

City officials said similar legislation has passed or is in the works in Alameda County and Santa Clara County, along with the cities of Oakland, Richmond and San Jose.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending