Connect with us

World

120 MEPs demand Hungary be stripped of its voting rights

Published

on

120 MEPs demand Hungary be stripped of its voting rights

A cross-party coalition of 120 Members of the European Parliament demand Hungary be stripped of its voting rights over the country’s democratic backsliding and Viktor Orbán’s “unacceptable” use of veto power.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We believe that this action is necessary to protect the values of the European Union,” the lawmakers say in a letter sent on Friday to the Parliament’s president, Roberta Metsola.

The text cites two main reasons to defend the unprecedented step: Hungary’s continued democratic backsliding, a recurring cause of concern in Brussels, and Orbán’s controversial role in the EU summit of December.

The Hungarian premier infuriated his fellow leaders when he made good on his threat to veto a proposed €50-billion fund to provide Ukraine with macro-financial assistance between 2024 and 2027. 

Approving the special fund, known as the Ukraine Facility, has become a matter of extreme urgency as Brussels has already run out of money to send to Kyiv, and Washington is stuck in a legislative impasse with no breakthrough in sight.

Leaders are set to reconvene again on 1 February to either greenlight the Facility or come up with an alternative plan. Ahead of the make-or-break date, Hungarian officials have put forward several requests in exchange for lifting the veto.

Advertisement

But while the Council remains hopeful a solution will be eventually found, patience in the Parliament is wearing thin.

In its joint letter, lawmakers urge the other EU institutions to forge ahead with Article 7, the “nuclear option” to address and correct violations of the bloc’s fundamental values.

Hungary has been under the first chapter of Article 7 since 2018. This stage identifies a “clear risk of a serious breach” of the core principles and forces the accused country to explain the situation in regular hearings. Thanks to the protection granted by the previous hard-right government in Poland, which was also put under Article 7, Budapest was able to remain in this first stage without facing any major repercussions.

Now, the group of 120 MEPs – out of a total of 705 – wants to trigger the second step of Article 7, where EU leaders, acting by unanimity, can determine the “existence of a serious and persistent” violation of fundamental values.

This decision requires a proposal submitted by either one-third of member states or by the European Commission, as well as the Parliament’s consent.

Advertisement

The lawmakers argue this move could take Hungary onto the third phase of Article 7, where the Council can vote to suspend “certain” rights enjoyed by the accused country, including voting rights to pass legislation and agree on common positions.

Crucially, the vote in the Council only requires a qualified majority. However, steps 2 and 3 have never been activated due to the radical nature of the suspension.

By taking Article 7 to the next level, “the European Union would be sending a clear message to Hungary that its actions are unacceptable,” the MEPs say.

“It would also be sending a message to all Member States that the European Union will not tolerate any backsliding on the Rule of Law or disrupting the principle of sincere cooperation, as enshrined in the Treaties.”

This “is the only way to protect the value of the European Union and ensure the functioning of the decision-making processes,” they add.

Advertisement

The letter was initiated on Tuesday by Petri Sarvamaa, a Finnish MEP who sits with the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP), the largest formation in the hemicycle. The deadline for collecting signatures closed on Friday at 15.00 CET, resulting in 120 lawmakers attaching their names.

The final list of endorsements features representatives from the main four groups: the EPP, the Socialists & Democrats (S&D), the liberals from Renew Europe, and the Greens, as well as a handful from The Left.

“The success of the letter demonstrates a clear willingness in the Parliament to launch Article 7.2, but above all, it highlights the urgency of addressing Viktor Orbán’s actions,” Sarvamaa said in an emailed statement. “Next, it would be crucial to measure the final overall support for the petition’s idea in plenary as soon as possible.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Parliament is working on a non-binding resolution focused on Hungary that will be voted upon during next week’s plenary session. Sarvamaa believes it is “very possible” that the idea of triggering the next steps of Article 7 will be “included in some form.” The baton will then be passed to President Metsola, he added.

“This level of support for launching a specific procedure has rarely, if ever, been seen within Parliament,” the Finnish politician said.

Still, the call from the hemicycle is symbolic and exposes one key shortcoming in the shared mission: activating the second phase of Article 7 cannot come from the Parliament itself, meaning lawmakers can do nothing but pile political pressure on the Commission and member states. 

Advertisement

Following the electoral victory of Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Hungary has been deprived of the Polish backing it relied on for the last eight years. This has left Orbán more politically isolated than ever, as the December summit laid bare. But leaders like Italy’s Giorgia Meloni and Slovakia’s Robert Fico are unlikely to back a move as radical as the suspension of voting rights, which would effectively turn Hungary into a powerless, second-class member state.

World

More conflict in curling as Canadian women are accused of the same violation as men

Published

on

More conflict in curling as Canadian women are accused of the same violation as men

CORTINA D’AMPEZZO, Italy (AP) — Canada’s women’s curling team at the Milan Cortina Olympics was accused Saturday of the same violation that prompted an expletive-laden outburst from a Canadian men’s curler a day earlier.

The latest accusation in a controversy that has divided the curling community led to more tense moments on the ice at the Cortina Curling Center.

In the first end of the women’s game against Switzerland, which the Swiss ultimately won 8-7, officials called a foul, saying that skip Rachel Homan had touched her stone again after releasing it.

In curling, that’s known as “double-touching,” and it’s against the rules.

Swedish curler Oskar Eriksson accused Canada ’s Marc Kennedy of the same infraction during Canada’s 8-6 win in round-robin play late Friday. On the ice, Kennedy repeatedly used profanity while denying he broke any rules. Although video of his throw appeared to confirm the accusation, Kennedy maintained his innocence into Saturday and went so far as to accuse Sweden of having a “premeditated” plan.

Advertisement

Though the Canadian women were not as fired up in response to the allegation of double-touching, they surely looked incredulous after the call.

“Like, absolutely not,” said Homan, who is known as one of the best skips in the world. “Zero-percent chance.”

Homan’s teammate, Emma Miskew, could be heard briefly engaging with an official on the sidelines, asking why video could not be used to review the call. The official explained that the team needed to trust the umpire. By rule, World Curling does not use video to review game play.

Before restarting the match, the Canadian women huddled with their coaches. Expletives could be heard from those in the circle, though it was not clear who uttered them.

After the game, Homan said she felt she’d been unfairly scrutinized because of the controversy on the men’s side.

Advertisement

“I don’t understand the call. I’ll never understand it. We’ve never done that,” she said. “It has nothing to do with us.”

After an early win over Denmark, the Canadian women have lost their last three matches. They lost to the United States on Friday, the first time in Olympic history that the U.S. had beaten Canada in women’s curling.

Also in women’s action on Saturday, Sweden women beat Italy 8-6, Denmark beat Korea 6-3 and the U.S. beat Japan 7-4.

___

AP Olympics: https://apnews.com/hub/milan-cortina-2026-winter-olympics

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

Global protests call for Iran regime change in major cities worldwide after bloody crackdown

Published

on

Global protests call for Iran regime change in major cities worldwide after bloody crackdown

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Anti-Iran regime protesters gathered in major cities across the globe on Saturday calling for a leadership change in the Global Day of Action Rally.

Over 250,000 protesters rallied in Munich, Germany on Saturday on the backdrop of the Munich Security Conference.

“With the number of participants recorded, this gathering is one of the largest rallies held in Munich in recent years,” the Munich Police reported in a press release. “The peaceful atmosphere is particularly noteworthy, despite the high number of participants in the meeting.”

IRAN REGIME REPORTEDLY ISSUED NATIONWIDE SHOOT-TO-KILL ORDERS AS PROTEST DEATH TOLL SURGES

Advertisement

Crowds reportedly chanted “change, change, regime change” and “democracy for Iran” with green-white-and-red flags with lion and sun emblems waving in the air with a few “Make Iran Great Again” red hats spotted.

Exiled Iranian crown prince Reza Pahlavi was among the hundreds of thousands protesting, telling Reuters, a possible attack on Iran will either weaken the regime or accelerate its fall.

“Global Day of Action” protests were held in major cities across the globe on Saturday. (Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images)

“It’s a matter of time. We are hoping that this attack will expedite the process and the people can be finally back in the streets and take it all the way to the ultimate regime’s downfall,” said Pahlavi.

He shared that he hopes President Trump will have the United States intervene and “have the people’s back.”

Advertisement

UPROAR AFTER IRAN NAMED VICE-CHAIR OF UN BODY PROMOTING DEMOCRACY, WOMEN’S RIGHTS

On Friday, President Trump said regime change in Iran would be the “best thing” to happen while speaking to troops at Fort Bragg in North Carolina.

Senator Graham said anti-regime protesters should “keep protesting.” ( James Willoughby/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

“People are hoping that at some point the decision will be made that there’s no use, there’s no point, we’re not going to get anywhere with negotiations,” said Pahlavi. “”Intervention is a way to save lives.”

South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham was present in Munich for the security conference and echoed a similar sentiment in a sideline interview on Friday.

Advertisement

NIKKI HALEY URGES TRUMP TO MAKE IRAN ACTION A ‘LEGACY-DEFINING MOMENT’ BEFORE LEAVING OFFICE

“There’s no negotiating with these people, in my view. They’re hell-bent on enacting an agenda based on religion that teaches them to lie, teaches them to destroy in the name of God,” said Graham.

“There’s no negotiating with these people, in my view,” said Graham at a rally in Munich. (Hannes Magerstaedt/Getty Images)

He shared that the regime is the weakest they have been since 1979, adding, “it is a regime with American blood on its hand,” calling on protesters to “keep protesting.”

The senator also took the stage at the Global Day of Action speaking to the crowd and holding up a “Make Iran Great Again” black hat.

Advertisement

Large demonstrations were also held in Toronto, Melbourne, Athens, Tokyo, London, and Los Angeles.

An estimated 350,000 people marched on the streets of Toronto, the city’s police spokesperson, Laura Brabant, told the Associated Press (AP).

Over 250,000 protesters rallied in Munich, Germany on Saturday on the backdrop of the Munich Security Conference. (Marijan Murat/picture alliance via Getty Images)

Iranian American activist and Beverly Hills plastic surgeon Dr. Sheila Nazarian told Fox News Digital the protests across the globe represent a universal truth. 

“When regimes silence their people, the people eventually find their voice. Whether in the streets of Tehran or in diaspora communities around the world,” she said.

Advertisement

Nazarian left Iran when she was 6 years old along with her family.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 

“As someone who came to this country from Iran, I know firsthand that these protests are not about politics, they’re about basic human dignity, women’s rights, and the fundamental freedom to live without fear,” she added. 

The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Will Warsaw become the seat of a new EU agency? To be decided in March

Published

on

Will Warsaw become the seat of a new EU agency? To be decided in March

At stake is prestige, hundreds of jobs and influence over how the European Union will protect its economic borders for decades to come. The new office is expected to be operational this year and will become fully operational two years later.

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT

Who will Warsaw face?

The list of candidates is long. In addition to Warsaw, the following are Liège (Belgium), Malaga (Spain), Lille (France), Zagreb (Croatia), Rome (Italy), The Hague (Netherlands), Porto (Portugal) and Bucharest (Romania).

Each city plays its own card. The Hague is promoting closer ties with Europol. Belgium and France are betting on logistics.

Poland is bringing geopolitical and operational arguments to the table: Warsaw is already home to the EU border agency Frontex, and the Polish government argues that, in an age of hybrid warfare, security and the synergy among these institutions are key.

Advertisement

The argument is simple: since customs officers and guards are fighting the same threats, they should work side by side.

Why is it worth the effort?

“On the one hand, hosting the headquarters of the EUCA offers more opportunities to actively participate in the process of reforming the customs union. On the other hand, it is an economic growth opportunity for the host city,” Małgorzata Krok, Plenipotentiary of the Minister of Finance and Economy for the application to establish the headquarters of the EU Customs Authority (EUCA), told Euronews.

“The new agency means increased business and tourist traffic, as well as the arrival of EUCA employees with their families. The EUCA is expected to eventually employ 250 people, but this number may increase in the future,” she said.

“Warsaw offers direct flights to all EU countries, as well as to candidate and partner countries. The synergy with Frontex, the proximity to all types of border crossings and the experience of our administration in customs matters and the creation of large-scale tax and customs IT systems, create optimal conditions for the development of the EUCA,” Krok added.

Polish diplomats also point out, behind the scenes, the weaknesses of rivals, noting that being a logistical hub for e-commerce, like Belgium or the Netherlands, in the era of the flood of cheap parcels from Asia can be a burden.

Advertisement

Poland’s biggest rival, however, is identified as France, which has been courting the agency for quite some time.

Not only taxes, but also security and technology

“The role of the tax collector has evolved into a guardian of the single market, the competitiveness of the economy and the security of citizens. It’s not just a question of smuggling or terrorism, but product compliance,” Magdalena Rzeczkowska, former Minister of Finance, added in an interview with Euronews. Rzeczkowska also previously managed the National Tax Administration and observed the evolution of customs from paper declarations to the digital age.

The former minister draws attention to our asset, namely the Frontex seat. The argument about the synergy of institutions is considered crucial, especially in the context of the security of the eastern flank: “We are talking about integrated border management, and this synergy is an important element. It is at the interface of the work of these institutions that security can really be built.”

Furthermore, the former minister points out that EUCA will also be a technology hub. “It should definitely not be officials in a suit, for the reason that the main task will be not only to build but also to maintain the EU Customs Data Hub,” she points out.

Rzeczkowska is echoed by Minister Krok: “The heart of the current customs reform will precisely be the data hub. The agency itself, on the other hand, will be the brain, analysing customs issues and risk at the EU level. With this, the agency has the potential to become a research and development centre in the customs area.”

Advertisement

What is the Customs Data Hub?

The struggle for localisation is only one dimension of the story. The real challenge is what the EUCA is supposed to manage: The EU Customs Data Hub.

Experts call this system the ‘nervous system’ of the new customs union. Instead of 27 separate national systems, the Union wants to create a single, unified database. This is supposed to enable real-time tracking of goods and the detection of dangerous products using artificial intelligence.

The reform is being driven by the crisis. According to European Commission forecasts, 5.6 billion parcels, the vast majority of which come from China, were expected to enter the Union in 2025. The current system is inefficient, and customs officials themselves are unable to physically control such a mass. The result? Europeans lose billions of euros in unpaid customs duties and taxes. It is this system that the new authority aims to seal.

However, business warns: without cooperation with the private sector (courier companies, e-commerce platforms), the construction of the ‘Data Hub’ could end up paralysing trade. The logistics industry has warned that the deadlines for implementing the changes are very tight and that the technical specifications remain unclear.

The industry itself adds that, without consultation with practitioners, the ambitious digital reform could lead to bottlenecks that will hit European consumers. At the same time, the Polish bid relies precisely on the argument that only a ‘digital stronghold’ with experience in crisis management will bear the burden.

Advertisement

This is why Warsaw, in fighting for the EUCA, is bidding not just to host officials, but to be the operational centre that must bear the biggest customs reform in the history of the European Union.

EUCA. The backstage of the competition

And what does the behind-the-scenes look like at the moment? Here, Minister Rzeczkowska is under no illusions about the nature of the choice of seat: “At the end of the day, it will be a political decision, although it shouldn’t quite be. We should look from the point of view of the independence of the institution”.

“We made a conscious decision to run for this office because we believe that it is in Warsaw that it will develop best. We are now actively persuading the decision-makers to do so,” indicates Krok, recalling that the decision will be made by the EU Council and the European Parliament.

The final verdict will come in March 2026. That is when it will become clear whether Brussels prefers to bet on the proven trade routes of the west or on a digital shield on the eastern flank – and whether the centre of gravity is finally shifting to the east in Europe’s new architecture.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending